this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
52
Whats with all the dunk tank content, much of which wouldnt pass rule 8 there, being posted to this comm lately? Stop? (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago by autismdragon@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
126 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] booty@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (40 children)

s a race to the bottom for whoever can dredge the dumbest and most incoherent takes riddled with slurs on the Steam forums or whatever garbage hole.

Is this what the dunk tank was before rule 8? Is that typically the kind of content removed under rule 8? Or is it just normal dunk tank content which would be allowed if the number next to the text was higher? Be honest.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah it certainly felt like that's what the dunk tank was.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I don't think so and the person I was talking to doesn't think so, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to discuss the situation from that perspective.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Well I think so, so it seems reasonable to discuss it from that perspective

load more comments (37 replies)