this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
1025 points (99.3% liked)

The Onion

6510 readers
212 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Maybe we can use this?

Since ~~bribery~~ gratuities are legal now, apparently, and the Supreme Court is legislating everything from the bench, maybe we can pool a sort of PAC and put together a prize sheet for different positive things we want. If they rule for those, they get the prize indicated. Kind of like the prizes you'd get for selling certain thresholds during school fundraisers.

Also kind of like the Criss Points system:

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Even if all the peasant in US united and pitched in, out collective buying power would still NOT be enough v top 10% but like even top 1%

Think about that.

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

But the bribe amounts have very little to do with how unfathomably rich the "donors" are! If you look at all those bribes, the amounts are still within the realm of what the 99% could put together.

But I don't even think it would cost the 99% that much, because it would force the 1% to up their game (in other words, there'd be bribe inflation) until the 99% can't follow suit, which means the 99% wouldn't even need to pay, in the end. But the higher price would make some bribers think twice, which might lead to less bribery happening.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)