Green - An environmentalist community

5310 readers

5 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml

Montana loses fight against youth climate activists in landmark ruling (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 years ago by jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Why not "youth activists win climate change fight against montana?"

[–] Dio@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because immediately stating the state lost in a headline has more impact. Do you not grasp writing.

Either way it exclaims the same thing so your gripe is moot.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do grasp writing, that is specifically why I asked this question, because the headline framing it as a loss is negative to people who aren't already supportive of climate action.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do grasp writing, that is specifically why I asked this question, because the headline framing it as a loss is negative to people who aren’t already supportive of climate action.

That's a lot of sentence. I would've used em dashes or maybe a semicolon to break up those thoughts.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a comment section, not a peer-reviewed journal, sir

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

And yet the information is just as fabricated…

load more comments (7 replies)