this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
59 points (85.5% liked)

Skeptic

1619 readers
1 users here now

A community for Scientific Skepticism:

Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.

Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.

Things we like:

Things we don't like:

Other communities of interest:

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Don't play games with disinformation.

Treating disinformation as worthy of equal-validity debate, itself "sends a message", validating the disinformation.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I understand why you're saying that, but I also think a show like this might convince fence-sitters that flat Earth ideas are nuts.

And James Randi and Penn Jillette could both say a lot about the benefits of using TV to mock pseudoscience. Adam Savage too, while we're at it.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

James Randi and Johnny Carson have some takedowns of fake psychics that are some of the best things ever shown on television.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zD7OgAdCObs&t=540s

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought that was going to be when they switched out Uri Gellar's props. I was not disappointed.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 1 year ago

My favorite part is Carson's pure politeness, and overt attempts to give him a fair showing and put him at ease. Like bro, any petard you're gonna get hung on is purely your own. I just wanna see you show me what you got. By all means: Go ahead.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)