this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
578 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

16310 readers
2136 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (8 children)

So... the back story here was that the article was done to highlight fake news or something. I forget which, but it wasn't... you know... somebody's lunch stuck on Webb's sensors. (That... that would be awkward...)

[–] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love it when anyone in academia calls out the BS double standard peer review is. A favorite one being the horrible outbreak of a medical condition known as Cello Scrotum.

[–] lunar17@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Figure one seems to only convey two messages:

Get me off

&

Get me your fucking mailing list

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

This is why we have peer review

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Astute observation.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Nah, that is about predatory publishing

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Those are good references. Very thorough.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Peer review is miniboss. That paper wouldn't have survived final boss - as many replication studies as it takes to prove it false. Which is probably only few.

load more comments (5 replies)