TechTakes

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

380

68

AI resorts to robot blackmail! — because Anthropic asked for a story of robot blackmail (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

6 comments fedilink

video version

381

27

AI coding bot allows prompt injection with a pull request (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

3 comments fedilink

video version

382

40

AI power and water use is through the roof, and 80–90% is each query (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

4 comments fedilink

video version

383

56

Google: “after billions of dollars spent, we found a brilliant and innovative way to monetize AI! You’ll never guess what it is!!!” (techcrunch.com)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by swlabr@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

13 comments fedilink

Take that, Saltman! Bet you never thought it was possible!

384

53

ChatGPT guessed this guys Dad's name. (infosec.pub)

submitted 10 months ago by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/techtakes@awful.systems

11 comments fedilink

Transcript

A news.ycombinator.com screenshot. It has two comments. The first reads: "I told ChatGPT my mom's name the day my account got persistent memory, last april. I also told it to figure out my dad's name. Once a month or so I would ask it my mom and dad's name. By november it had figured out my dad's name. https://x.com/kenwarner/status/1859637611595214888" It has a reply saying "Unfortunately I feel like the fact that your dad's name is the same as yours somewhat diminishes that accomplishment.".

385

108

You can’t feed generative AI on ‘bad’ data then filter it for only ‘good’ data (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

57 comments fedilink

video version

386

34

UK AI unicorn Builder.ai is dead — the downfall of “AGI”: A Guy Instead (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

7 comments fedilink

video version

387

52

eating our own dogshit (old.reddit.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

36 comments fedilink

388

134

GitHub wants to spam open source projects with AI slop (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

25 comments fedilink

Video version

389

58

Chicago Sun-Times prints summer reading list full of fake books (arstechnica.com)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

8 comments fedilink

This is peak laziness. It seems that the reading list's author used autoplag to extrude the entire 60 page supplemental insert. The author also super-promises this has never happened before.

390

18

DEFRA and Natural England creates unusably wrong peat map — with AI! (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

1 comments fedilink

video version

391

17

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 25th May 2025 (awful.systems)

submitted 10 months ago by BlueMonday1984@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

171 comments fedilink

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

392

66

Latest AI-hallucinated legal filing, from AI vendor Anthropic (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

14 comments fedilink

Video version

Podcast version if you hate pictures

393

46

How to make a splash in AI economics: fake your data (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

1 comments fedilink

Video version

394

62

Does AI make researchers more productive? What? Why would it? Apparently you can just say that and almost get published! (thebsdetector.substack.com)

submitted 10 months ago by V0ldek@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

17 comments fedilink

This is a nice post, but it has such an annoying sentence right in the intro:

At the time I saw the press coverage, I didn’t bother to click on the actual preprint and read the work. The results seemed unsurprising: when researchers were given access to AI tools, they became more productive. That sounds reasonable and expected.

What? What about it sounds reasonable? What about it sounds expected given all we know about AI??

I see this all the time. Why do otherwise skeptical voices always have the need to put in a weakening statement like this. "For sure, there are some legitimate uses of AI" or "Of course, I'm not claiming AI is useless" like why are you not claiming that. You probably should be claiming that. All of this garbage is useless until proven otherwise! "AI does not increase productivity" is the null hypothesis! It's the only correct skeptical position! Why do you seem to need to extend benefit of the doubt here, like seriously, I cannot explain this in any way.

395

19

Trump announces vaporware AI data centres in the United Arab Emirates (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

3 comments fedilink

Video version

396

61

Musk ("xAI") now claims grok was hacked (xcancel.com)

submitted 10 months ago by diz@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

17 comments fedilink

I couldn't stop fucking laughing. I'm wheezing. It's unhealthy.