Socialist News: The Haywood Journal

57 readers
1 users here now

The Haywood Journal is an independent newspaper and forum dedicated to reporting on life, work, and communities. We publish original reporting, firsthand accounts, interviews, and documented observations focused on workers, labor conditions, rights, public policy, and the everyday realities that shape working lives.

Our aim is straightforward: to record what is happening, verify what can be verified, and present it clearly, without press releases, corporate framing, or partisan spin.

This forum exists to support that mission.

We value accuracy, sourcing, and good faith participation. This is a space for sharing information that often goes unnoticed, and keeping a public record of how power, work, and daily life intersect.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

By Buckminster Burkeswood, The Haywood Journal

It's sometimes said that history prefers its heroes tidy. Middle-aged. Respectable. Calm under pressure. Claudette Colvin was none of those things, and for decades, that made her inconvenient.

On March 2, 1955, the air in Montgomery carried the dull warmth of early spring, thick enough that the ride home felt slower than usual. Claudette Colvin was fifteen, still in her school uniform, her books balanced on her lap as the bus rumbled through familiar streets on the way home. When the driver stopped and told her to stand so a white woman could take the seat, three other Black girls in her row rose without a word.

Colvin did not. She stayed where she was, her hands gripping the metal edges of the chair, her heart pounding hard enough that she could feel it in her throat.

Later, she would say it felt as though Sojourner Truth pressed down on one shoulder and Harriet Tubman on the other, holding her there.

“I was glued to my seat,” she said.

Police dragged her from the bus. One officer kicked her. Another mocked her body while she sat handcuffed in the back of the squad car. She was charged with assault, disorderly conduct, and violating segregation laws. She was terrified, not just of jail but of what might follow. That night, her father sat awake with a shotgun, afraid the Ku Klux Klan might come.

Nine months later, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus. The city erupted. Parks became a symbol. Colvin receded into the margins.

The difference between them was optics.

Colvin was young, dark-skinned, outspoken, and poor. She came from a fractured family, raised by relatives on a farm after her father left and her mother struggled to support the household. She was bright, ambitious, and politically awake, steeped in Black history lessons at school that had sharpened her sense of injustice. She was also, by the standards of the movement’s leadership at the time, a liability.

“My mother told me to be quiet about what I did,” Colvin later recalled. “She said, ‘Let Rosa be the one. White people aren’t going to bother Rosa. Her skin is lighter than yours, and they like her.’”

Civil rights leaders worried they “couldn’t win with her.” They described her as “mouthy,” “emotional,” “feisty.” When Colvin became pregnant later that year, the decision was sealed. An unmarried teenage mother would not, they believed, play well in court or the press.

What Colvin lost in public recognition, she regained in legal consequence. In 1956, she became one of four plaintiffs in Browder v. Gayle, the federal case that ultimately ended bus segregation in Montgomery and across Alabama. Rosa Parks was not a plaintiff. Claudette Colvin was. She testified clearly and forcefully, anchoring the case in lived experience rather than symbolism.

Fred Gray, the civil rights attorney who represented both Parks and Colvin, later said, “Claudette gave all of us moral courage. If she had not done what she did, I am not sure we would have been able to mount the support for Mrs. Parks.”

The ruling changed American law. But Colvin’s life did not change much at all.

She was branded a troublemaker. Jobs were hard to find. College fell away. Eventually she left the South, moving to New York City, where she raised two sons and worked quietly for decades as a nurse’s aide. She did not become a professional activist. She did not join a speaking circuit. She lived, as millions of women do, in the shadow of history she helped shape but did not control.

Her story resurfaced in 2009 with the publication of Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice, by Philip Hoose, who uncovered more than a hundred letters of support written on her behalf in the 1950s letters that were never enough to overcome strategic caution and class bias. Colvin herself remained clear-eyed about it.

“They wanted someone impressive to white people,” she said years later. “Someone who would draw them in. They didn’t think a dark-skinned teenage girl without money or a degree could do that.”

Colvin never framed herself as a socialist in the doctrinal sense, but her life embodied the core tensions that socialist thinkers have long emphasized: class exclusion, the uneven distribution of dignity, and the way respectability politics can reproduce inequality even inside liberation movements. She was proof that structural change often relies on those who are least rewarded by it.

In 2021, at age eighty-one, Colvin petitioned to have her juvenile arrest record expunged. For more than six decades, she had technically remained on indefinite probation for assaulting a police officer during her arrest. The court agreed. Her record was cleared.

“I am an old woman now,” she said in a sworn statement. “Having my records expunged will mean something to my grandchildren and great-grandchildren. And it will mean something for other Black children.”

Claudette Colvin died on January 13, 2026, at the age of eighty-six. Her foundation described her as “wise, resilient, and grounded in faith,” a woman with sharp wit and a deep belief in human dignity. She was survived by her family and by a legal legacy that reshaped the country, even if it took the country a long time to notice.

History likes to decide who counts and who doesn’t. Claudette Colvin was there anyway, whether the story chose to include her or tried to edit her out.

2
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42764623

This model assumes, first of all, that "there are three kinds of people possible, relative to any political system":

Relative to any single, political system, you may have people who have the following significant variety of attitudes:

  1. "I don't want anything to do with this political system, even though everyone else chose it. I want to be left alone, and left out of this system, as much as possible." (Doesn't want to participate, isn't ambitious)

  2. "I want to nominally participate in this political system, but, I want to do the least amount of work possible within it, while otherwise having as much fun as possible. I'm willing to work with the others, but I would like to do that as little as possible, in exchange for having as much freetime as possible, to have as much fun as possible." (Wants to minimally participate, isn't ambitious)

  3. "I want to maximize the efficiency and proficiency of human society, along with others who want to do that" (Wants to participate a lot, is ambitious)

A "Freedom Communism" model is devised to attempt to meet the wants of these three different groups, all at once. There are ambition-seekers, fun-seekers, and those who want to be left alone. How can we provide ideal conditions for all of them at once, in a system that overall emphasizes both freedom and societal proficiency?

[Conversation starter] [I'm gonna edit/add to this... hold on... just wanted to get the post started---> this is the starting proposition/problem.... feel free to add your own thoughts! i have a half-worked-out idea for how to achieve this, will take a lot of typing though, check back later today or tomorrow or the next day if you're interested in this post! * work in progress; beginning section ^

YOU HAVE TO PUT THE COMMENTS SECTION INTO "NEW" OR "OLD" ORDER (I GUESS OLD ACTUALLY TO READ THE NEXT PARTS TOP-DOWN IN ORDER) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NEXT PARTS: ITS ALL WRITTEN IN ORDER: SET TO OLD, READ STRAIGHT THROUGH

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13