Scott Ritter/U.S. Tour of Duty

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The potential for a large-scale war between the United States and Iran, and the perspectives of Scott Ritter and Larry Johnson on the situation.

Key Points:

• Imminent War Threat: Reports suggest an imminent, large-scale US attack on Iran, potentially involving tactical nuclear weapons. This is driven by Iran's possession of 60% enriched uranium, which could be quickly converted into nuclear weapons.
• Iran's Actions: Iran's accumulation of 60% enriched uranium and statements by Iranian officials suggesting a near-term nuclear weapons capability are seen as provoking the US.
• US Justification: The US government views Iran's potential nuclear weapons program as an existential threat to Israel, justifying a preemptive strike.
• Consequences of War: Both Ritter and Johnson warn of catastrophic regional consequences, including potential escalation to a wider conflict involving Russia and China. They also predict devastating consequences for the Iranian people and regime.
• Alternative Perspectives: Johnson argues that Iran has a right to nuclear weapons and that the US has a history of aggression and false justifications for war. He also questions the US's assumptions about the fragility of the Iranian regime and the likelihood of a successful regime change.
• Role of Sanctions: Ritter highlights the weakening effect of long-term sanctions on the Iranian government, potentially making it more vulnerable to internal unrest.
• US Intentions: Both analysts believe the US is not genuinely interested in negotiation and is pursuing a regime-change operation in Iran.
• Russia's Role: Russia has warned against a US attack on Iran, but is unlikely to intervene militarily. The analysts discuss the strategic relationship between Iran and Russia, and how this could influence the situation.
• Unforeseen Consequences: Both analysts warn of unpredictable and potentially disastrous consequences for the entire Middle East if the US attacks Iran, including the potential for regional instability and the collapse of the Iranian regime.

Highlights:

• The passionate and sometimes heated debate between Ritter and Johnson, highlighting their differing perspectives on the situation.
• Ritter's strong warnings about the potential for a catastrophic war and his belief that Iran's actions have made a war more likely.
• Johnson's counterarguments emphasizing the US's history of aggression and the potential for unintended consequences.
• The discussion of the complex geopolitical dynamics involving the US, Iran, Russia, China, and Israel.
• The analysts' shared concern about the potential for massive loss of life and regional instability.

About Channel:

Dedicated to dialogue and peace!

At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.

This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.

We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.

Generated Summary:

This YouTube video features Scott Ritter discussing the ongoing conflict in Yemen and the ineffectiveness of the Trump administration's approach. The main points are:

Key Points:

• Ineffectiveness of Military Intervention: Ritter argues that the US military strategy in Yemen has failed. He contends that the Houthis [Ansar Allah] will not surrender through military pressure, and that attempts to bomb them into submission will only lead to escalation, civilian casualties, and ultimately, failure. He cites the example of past military interventions where similar tactics proved unsuccessful.
• The Need for a Diplomatic Solution: Ritter emphasizes the necessity of a diplomatic solution, highlighting the need for a ceasefire, the resumption of humanitarian aid, and a de-escalation of tensions. He believes that only through diplomacy can a sustainable peace be achieved.
• Intelligence Failures: Ritter criticizes the US intelligence community's approach, arguing that the current system lacks experts with deep knowledge of the region and its actors. He suggests that the over-reliance on short-term, rotating specialists hinders effective analysis and decision-making. The lack of in-depth analysis leads to flawed conclusions and ineffective strategies.
• The Role of Russia and China: Ritter suggests that Russia and China have built trust with Iran, creating an opportunity for indirect negotiations to de-escalate tensions in the region. He believes that the US should leverage this relationship to find a diplomatic solution, rather than relying solely on military force.
• Trump's Approach: Ritter analyzes Trump's approach, suggesting that while Trump initially seemed to favor a more diplomatic approach, the current administration's actions indicate a return to a more aggressive, military-focused strategy, which Ritter believes is doomed to fail.

Highlights:

• Ritter's strong criticism of Marco Rubio's understanding of the conflict and his prediction that US carrier battle groups will withdraw before the Houthis quit.
• Ritter's detailed explanation of the challenges of targeting in Yemen and the limitations of air power.
• Ritter's analysis of the intelligence failures and the need for deep regional expertise.
• Ritter's suggestion of a potential diplomatic solution involving Russia, China, and Iran.

About Channel:

Dedicated to dialogue and peace!

At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.

This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.

We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.

Generated Summary Below:

Video Description:

Scott Ritter : How Foolish to Attack The Houthis.

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The interview discusses the unwise decision by the Trump administration to attack Houthis and civilians in Yemen, the complexities of the US-Russia relationship regarding the Ukraine conflict, and the internal political turmoil within Israel.

Key Points:

• Yemen Conflict: Ritter argues that the US bombing of Houthis is counterproductive and based on a misunderstanding of the conflict. He highlights the Houthis' resilience, their motivations (primarily stemming from the blockade of Gaza and the humanitarian crisis), and the futility of bombing them into submission. He emphasizes the long history of US involvement in the conflict, including supplying Saudi Arabia with weapons and intelligence. He also points out the lack of clear military objectives and the potential for escalating the conflict with Iran.
• US-Russia Relations: Ritter critiques the inconsistencies in the Trump administration's approach to the Ukraine conflict, highlighting the disconnect between Trump's stated understanding of the conflict's origins and the actions taken by his administration (such as Rubio's actions). He suggests that the attempts to strong-arm Russia are unlikely to succeed.
• Israel's Internal Strife: The discussion touches upon the political tensions in Israel, focusing on Netanyahu's attempts to fire the head of Shin Bet, amidst ongoing investigations and deep societal divisions. Ritter highlights the potential for civil war in Israel.
• Communication Breakdown: Ritter stresses the importance of open communication and the negative consequences of the US government cutting off communication channels with the Houthis, hindering accurate information gathering.

Highlights:

• Ritter's strong criticism of the Trump administration's handling of both the Yemen conflict and US-Russia relations, characterizing the actions as foolish, incompetent, and based on a lack of understanding of the regional dynamics.
• The comparison between the current situation and past US military interventions, highlighting the repetition of mistakes and the unintended consequences of bombing campaigns.
• The emphasis on the Houthis' strength and determination, contrasting their capabilities with the US's perceived arrogance and ignorance.
• The suggestion of alternative, less violent approaches to resolving the conflicts, such as prioritizing humanitarian aid and direct diplomatic engagement.
• The warning about the potential for a wider conflict and the severe economic consequences of escalating the situation in the Middle East.

About Channel:

Hard-hitting legal/political news from a man who knows and respects the Constitution and the importance of defending individual freedoms. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano.

A daily discussion of news from the perspective that government is the negation of liberty, and the individual is greater than the state. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano is a graduate of Princeton University and the University of Notre Dame Law School. He is the youngest life-tenured Superior Court judge in the history of the State of New Jersey. He sat on the bench from 1987 to 1995, when he presided over more than 150 jury trials and thousands of motions, sentencings, and hearings.

JudgeNap is nationally known for watching and reporting on the government as it takes liberty and property.

The Judge is the author of nine books on the U.S. Constitution, two of which have been New York Times Best Sellers. Learn more at JudgeNap.com

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/25807782

Generated Summary Below:

Video Description:

#scottritterlatest #sabbysabs #trumpwantstocutmilitarybudget #trumpgazaplan #geopoliticsinconflict

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The interview analyzes Donald Trump's unconventional approaches to resolving the war in Ukraine and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, contrasting them with the strategies of the Biden administration. It also delves into broader criticisms of US foreign policy and the role of misinformation.

Key Points:

• Ukraine: Ritter argues that Trump's proposed peace deal, which involves Ukraine foregoing NATO membership, is not a surrender but a realistic assessment of the situation. He contends that the war's root cause is NATO expansion, and that continuing the conflict is futile and costly. He criticizes the Biden administration for escalating the conflict and ignoring opportunities for peace.
• Israel-Palestine: Ritter claims Trump's seemingly outrageous proposal for a Gaza solution was a strategic maneuver to pressure Arab nations into a counter-proposal for rebuilding Gaza without displacing Palestinians. He highlights the success of this tactic, leading to Egyptian and Saudi involvement.
• US Foreign Policy: The interview heavily criticizes US foreign policy, particularly the “rules-based international order,” which Ritter views as a tool for maintaining American hegemony and creating unnecessary enemies like Russia. He accuses the US of manipulating events in Ukraine and elsewhere to serve its own interests, including supporting authoritarian regimes and spreading misinformation.
• Trump's Approach: Ritter portrays Trump as a pragmatic leader willing to engage in unconventional diplomacy, even if it means making controversial statements, to achieve peace. He contrasts this with the Biden administration's perceived rigidity and adherence to failed strategies.

Highlights:

• Ritter's strong criticism of the Biden administration's handling of the Ukraine conflict and its long-term foreign policy.
• The detailed explanation of the Minsk agreements and their alleged manipulation by NATO.
• The analysis of Trump's Gaza proposal as a calculated move to force Arab nations into action.
• The discussion of the deep-seated corruption within US foreign policy and its relationship with Israel.
• Ritter's assertion that Trump's actions, if successful, could warrant a Nobel Peace Prize.

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

Question asked to Scott Ritter: DJT just appointed you to negotiate a peace plan with Iran aimed at inducing them to abondon a nuclear weapons program. For the first draft he wants carrot only, no stick, and says nothing is off the table. What security and economic deals do you have for Iran to guarantee they don't end up like Libya once he is out of office in 2029?

-- Ask The Inspector, Scott Ritter hosted by Jeff Norman:

Scott's rough response and views:

• I will not provide Iran with any security guarantees; Iran does not need America to provide its security guarantees.
• I am not a threat to Iran; formal declaration of the end of regime change policy by the USA. The CIA would dissolve the Iran Mission Center if not done so already.
• The CIA would no longer be interested in regime change and would dissociate with all monarchist groups and separatist entities.
• Here to talk about Iran's economic future and not having a nuclear weapons program or the potential to create nuclear bombs. Nuclear energy is allowed.
• Respect Iran's sovereign decisions, everything but nuclear weapons, but also allowing ballistic missiles because it is their strategic deterrent.
• Encourage Iran to sign the security pact that they will be signing with Russia on January 17, 2025; it is a sovereign decision by Iran.
• As a negotiator, the nuclear issue is all he cares about.
• Keep it as simple as possible; do not complicate or throw too many things into the mix.
• It has to be a straight quid pro quo. We lift sanctions, we encourage the whole world to do business with Iran, and in exchange, Iran submits its nuclear program to be under stringent inspections that never go away; you never have the ability to enrich uranium to build nuclear weapons.
• Keep it to a simple trade.

Video Discription:

Full Episode: https://rumble.com/v64zosj-ask-the-inspector-with-scott-ritter-ep.-226-streams-live-on-jan-3-at-8-pm-e.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Tags: News, Trending News, Scott Ritter, Russia, Trump, USA, Biden, Iran

U.S. Tour of Duty is an American revival led by Scott Ritter and civic-minded allies.

Scott Ritter : How Syria Fell.

About:

Hard-hitting legal/political news from a man who knows and respects the Constitution and the importance of defending individual freedoms. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano.

A daily discussion of news from the perspective that government is the negation of liberty, and the individual is greater than the state. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano is a graduate of Princeton University and the University of Notre Dame Law School. He is the youngest life-tenured Superior Court judge in the history of the State of New Jersey. He sat on the bench from 1987 to 1995, when he presided over more than 150 jury trials and thousands of motions, sentencings, and hearings.

JudgeNap is nationally known for watching and reporting on the government as it takes liberty and property.

The Judge is the author of nine books on the U.S. Constitution, two of which have been New York Times Best Sellers. Learn more at JudgeNap.com

Dedicated to dialogue and peace!

At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.

This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.

We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.

I’m trying to keep an open mind.

To remind myself that the threat from nuclear war outweighs all other considerations.

But the pandering to a genocidal apartheid state by both Democrats and Republicans negates both of their candidates on a moral basis.

Maybe Trump will stop a nuclear war with Russia.

Maybe.

But only a viable third party can break the duopoly that governs America today.

A duopoly that has sold the American soul to Zionism.

Jill Stein has a moral compass.

She won’t be President.

But if enough people vote for her, maybe—if we survive—there will be a President who isn’t from the duopoly.

Get Jill above 5%.

And save America.

Source: https://x.com/RealScottRitter/status/1843407322728509552

@RealScottRitter

(Note: this post corrects an error contained in the initial post. The summary referenced was prepared by the Uhuru-3 PR, not by their legal team.)

Everyone should reflect on what happened in the trial of the Uhuru-3 earlier this week. According to a summary prepared by the Uhuru-3’s PR team,

“Uhuru 3 attorneys forced the lead investigator, and FBI’s star witness, to admit that there was no evidence to prove accusations made in the DOJ’s indictment. They exposed as lies the DOJ statements that there was Russian interference in the mayoral campaign of Jesse Nevel.

•Uhuru 3 attorney: “Do you have any evidence of Russian interference in the 2017 St. Petersburg, Florida mayoral campaign of Jesse Nevel?” FBI: “No”

•Uhuru 3 attorney: “Why was that accusation included in the indictment?” FBI: “I didn’t write the indictment.”

•Uhuru 3 attorney: “When you were in discussions with the DOJ about the indictments, you were aware that there was no evidence of Russian interference in Jesse Nevel’s electoral campaign?” FBI: “Yes.”

•Uhuru 3 attorney: “So a press release was issued saying that the Russian government was interfering in U.S elections through Jesse Nevel’s campaign while you knew there was absolutely no evidence of that.” FBI: “Yes.”

Let’s be clear: This exchange raises serious questions about the integrity and credibility of our judicial process.

The FBI lied when it presented its case before a Grand Jury.

The Magistrate Judge failed to due the due diligence required before signing off on the indictment of the Uhuru-3.

And the Department of Justice lied when it crafted the “crimes” alleged to have been committed.

Hopefully the Jury will see through these lies and deliver a verdict of innocent.

The real question is what, if any, penalty there will be for the FBI and DoJ for trampling the rights of American citizen?

[Image showing protestors with signs: one reading "Drop the charges against the Uhuru 3"]

Source: https://x.com/RealScottRitter/status/1833913239736033697

Editor note: This interview was recorded Nov. 4, 2022

Former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter explains why a Russian victory is inevitable, and what it costs the West to refuse to accept this.

William Scott Ritter Jr. is an author and pundit, and a former United States Marine Corps intelligence officer and United Nations weapons inspector.

Dimitri Lascaris is a lawyer, journalist and activist from Montreal, Quebec. In 2020, Dimitri ran for the leadership of the Green Party of Canada.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18842774

The British journalist revealed on X his treatment by the authorities after being arrested under Section 12 of the U.K.’s Terrorism Act.

Scott Ritter is a former Marine intelligence officer who served in the former Soviet Union, implementing arms control agreements, and on the staff of General Norman Schwartzkopf during the Gulf War, where he played a critical role in the hunt for Iraqi SCUD missiles. From 1991 until 1998, Mr. Ritter served as a Chief Inspector for the United Nations in Iraq, leading the search for Iraq’s proscribed weapons of mass destruction. Mr. Ritter was a vocal critic of the American decision to go to war with Iraq. His new book, Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika: Arms Control and the End of the Soviet Union, is his ninth.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18657256

Journalism and Analysis from an Anti-imperialist Perspective

Former UN Weapons Inspector and US Marine Corps Intelligence Officer Scott Ritter (https://scottritter.com/) joins the show to react to the latest U.S. government attempt to silence him, how the Kursk offensive is dooming Ukraine to oblivion, and what comes next for the Middle East as Israel and Iran brace for war. This stream will cover all of the most pressing world developments and provide the key geopolitical analysis needed to understand them.

#Ukraine #Kursk #Russia #Israel #Iran