I would like to get your feedbacks. How does it look? Add it to your wishlist to support me on this journey. Here is the steam link: https://store.steampowered.com/app/3896300/Toll_Booth_Simulator_Schedule_of_Chaos/

Hackernews.

I'm currently writing a CLI tool that handles a specific JSON data format. And I also want to give the user to get a slice of the item array of the file. It's a slice in form of --slice START:END through commandline options. So in example --slice 1:2.

1. Should I provide a 0 based index for the access or a 1 based index? In example --slice 1:2 with 0 based index would start with the second element and with 1 based index it would start with the first element.
2. And would you think its better to have the END to be inclusive or exclusive? In example --slice 1:2 would get only one element if its exclusive or it gets two elements if its inclusive.

I know this is all personal taste, but I'm currently just torn between all options and cannot decide. And thought to ask you what you think. Maybe that helps me sorting my own thoughts a bit. Thanks in advance.

Im 19 and for years my mother has been telling me to use codecademy but most of its locked behind a paywall. Have any of you used this site, what are your thoughts on it? Are there better totally free alternatives that walk you thru everything?

Someday i want to make games or something like that but im unsure what programming language to choose. I like the look of lua but im not sure if i should go with it or what projects to learn from? Everyone here tells me if i i choose to go with gamedev someday, to pick up godot but i feel im not ready to make games and that i need to start learning the basics.

I would like to get your feedbacks. How does it look? Add it to your wishlist to support me on this journey.

Here is the Steam link: https://store.steampowered.com/app/3896300/Toll_Booth_Simulator_Schedule_of_Chaos/

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/16416819

Hi, what's the best way for testing a gin route?

I currently have one function where the routes are defined. Here it is:

package router

import (
	"github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
	"github.com/gragorther/epigo/handlers"
	"github.com/gragorther/epigo/middlewares"
)

func Setup(userUserStore handlers.UserUserStore, groupGroupStore handlers.GroupGroupStore, groupAuthStore handlers.GroupAuthStore, messageAuthStore handlers.MessageAuthStore, messageMessageStore handlers.MessageMessageStore, middlewareUserStore middlewares.UserStore) *gin.Engine {
	r := gin.Default()
	r.Use(middlewares.ErrorHandler())

	userHandler := handlers.NewUserHandler(userUserStore)
	authHandler := middlewares.NewAuthMiddleware(middlewareUserStore)
	groupHandler := handlers.NewGroupHandler(groupGroupStore, groupAuthStore)
	messageHandler := handlers.NewMessageHandler(messageMessageStore, messageAuthStore)

	// user stuff
	r.POST("/user/register", userHandler.RegisterUser)
	r.POST("/user/login", userHandler.LoginUser)
	r.GET("/user/profile", authHandler.CheckAuth, userHandler.GetUserProfile)
	r.PUT("/user/setEmailInterval", authHandler.CheckAuth, userHandler.SetEmailInterval)

	// groups
	r.DELETE("/user/groups/delete/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.DeleteGroup)
	r.POST("/user/groups/add", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.AddGroup)
	r.GET("/user/groups", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.ListGroups) // list groups
	r.PATCH("/user/groups/edit/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, groupHandler.EditGroup)

	// lastMessages
	r.POST("/user/lastMessages/add", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.AddLastMessage)
	r.GET("/user/lastMessages", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.ListLastMessages)
	r.PATCH("/user/lastMessages/edit/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.EditLastMessage)
	r.DELETE("/user/lastMessages/delete/:id", authHandler.CheckAuth, messageHandler.DeleteLastMessage)
	return r
}

so, my question is, how can I test just one route? should I run this function in every test and send a request to a route with httptest? Or should I set up my handlers like it's described at https://gin-gonic.com/en/docs/testing/

(like this)

func postUser(router *gin.Engine) *gin.Engine {
  router.POST("/user/add", func(c *gin.Context) {
    var user User
    c.BindJSON(&user)
    c.JSON(200, user)
  })
  return router
}

let me know if you have any other questions about my code.

It's available on github: https://github.com/gragorther/epigo

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/34279957

guix shell sees to it that all of the dependencies (listed in the inputs and native-inputs sections) are available within the shell session it creates by downloading (or building, if necessary) the entire dependency tree.

Should you want/need more isolation from the host system, guix shell has you covered. The --pure flag will clear out most existing environments variables, such as $PATH, so that the resulting environment does not contain pointers to places like /usr. For more Docker-like isolation, the --container flag can be used, which will run the new shell session within a set of Linux namespaces so that the host system is inaccessible.

I’ve been working on this (not so little anymore) project for some time now, and I’m finally happy with the branding, UX and docs state.

It’s a scripting language I made at first as a toy, to learn new parsing methods, explore compiler optimizations, and go back to VM land where everything is low level and amazing (at least for me) ; it’s now a fully fledged language that can be used as a scripting language like Python or Ruby, and can also be very easily embedded inside a project, as one would do with Lua.

Let me know your thoughts and opinions on the project!

Hackernews.

Hackernews.

Alternatives:

• The Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
• Open-Meteo.
• Open Weather.

Decentralized Architecture: https://positive-intentions.com/blog/decentralised-architecture

While my approach here could be considered overly complicated (because, well, it is), I'm trying something new, and it's entirely possible this strategy won't be viable long-term. My philosophy is "there's only one way to find out." I'm not necessarily recommending this approach, just sharing my journey and what I'm doing.

Potential Benefits

I've identified some interesting benefits to this approach:

• Statics as Chat App Infrastructure: https://positive-intentions.com/blog/statics-as-a-chat-app-infrastructure

While I often see module federation and microfrontends discouraged in online discussions, I believe they're a good fit for my specific approach. I'm optimistic about the benefits and wanted to share the details.

When serving the federated modules, I can also host the Storybook statics. I think this could be an excellent way to document the modules in isolation.

Modules and Applications

Here are some examples of the modules and how they're being used:

• Cryptography Modules: https://cryptography.positive-intentions.com/?path=%2Fdocs%2Fcryptography-introduction--docs
• P2P Framework: https://p2p.positive-intentions.com/?path=%2Fdocs%2Fe2e-tests-connectionstatus--docs

This setup allows me to create microfrontends that consume these modules, enabling me to share functionality between different applications. The following applications, which have distinct codebases (and a distinction between open and closed source), would be able to leverage this:

• P2P Chat: https://chat.positive-intentions.com/
• P2P File Transfer: https://file.positive-intentions.com/

Sharing these dependencies should make it easier to roll out updates to core mechanics across these diverse applications.

Furthermore, this functionality also works when I create an Android build with Tauri. This could streamline the process of creating new applications that utilize these established modules.

Considerations and Future

I'm sure there will be some distinct testing and maintenance overhead with this architecture. However, depending on how it's implemented, I believe it could work and make it easier to improve upon the current functionality.

It's important to note that everything about this project is far from finished. Some might view this as an overly complicated way to achieve what npm already does. However, I think this approach offers greater flexibility by allowing for the separation of open and closed-source code for the web. Of course, being JavaScript, the "source code" will always be accessible, especially in the age of AI where reverse-engineering is more possible than ever before.

So i want to achieve many types of hobbies. For the longest time ive wanted to make games but im honestly unsure where to start, what tools to pick up, and what to learn especially sense i want to attempt to learn for free without having to pay for anything.

Ive been told gamedev is like learning a new language in a way. I could use a point in a starting direction if possible.

I also have a dumb question but i cant really make out a different between the definitions of coding and programming, what is the difference if any?

Hackernews.