NonCredibleDiplomacy

464 readers
1 users here now

Shitposting about geopolitics, diplomacy, and current events for shits and giggles

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
2
 
 

Banger from Lhkjima

In my proposal I suggest we strengthen the United Nations ability to provide assistance to worldwide efforts by providing the IAEA with a nuclear submarine with nuclear weapons capability.

The submarine would give it global reach and ability to engage in nuclear deterrence in any signatary, or not, country on the planet since 70% or so is water. Stealth capability would improve it's moral effect as countries would not be able to infer it's presence or absence on it's vicinity and tracking via satelites would be impossible.

The IAEA have many nuclear experts, so maintaining it would not be a big challenge and servicing the sub would be made on worldwide ports also signed with the IAEA.

This is NOT for peacekeeping, I'm not suggesting giving the UN an army, ONLY the submarine(s) and the nuke(s). Peacekeeping efforts are not in consideration of the usage of the nuclear weapons.

The nuclear weapons program would work with other UN branches to enchance their ability to provide assistance worldwide.

The usage of nuclear deterrence could be applicable in the following scenarios as examples:

  • Failure in following vaccination plans and return of eradicated diseases: Nuclear Deterrence;

  • Resistance to disease eradication efforts: Nuclear Deterrence;

  • Failure in providing adequate living conditions to the population in general: Nuclear Deterrence;

  • Precarization of educational efforts: Nuclear Deterrence;

  • Humanitarian abuse and violations of international law: Nuclear Deterrence

  • Not following international agreements on environmental pollution: Nuclear Deterrence

I could list more situations where having nuclear deterrece would help global effort in bettering our lives but I leave it as an exercise for the reader.

3
4
56
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by qaz@lemmy.world to c/noncrediblediplomacy@sh.itjust.works
 
 

It worked for Rutte, so maybe?

5
 
 
6
7
8
9
 
 

10
11
12
13
 
 
14
15
16
17
 
 

FYI: Trump imposed tariffs on an island which only has penguins and seals as permanent inhabitants

18
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27833143

context

transcript

DISRUPT INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING NOW!!

OGEY

Niche ocean carrier Atlantic Container Line is warning the fines the U.S. government is considering hitting Chinese-built freight vessels with would force it to leave the United States and throw the global supply chain out of balance, potentially fueling freight rates not seen since Covid.

“This hits American exporters and importers worse than anybody else,” said Andrew Abbott, CEO of ACL. “If this happens, we’re out of business and we’re going to have to shut down.”

[...] U.S. is no position to win an economic war that places ocean carriers using Chinese-made vessels in the middle. Soon, Chinese-made vessels will represents 98% of the trade ships on the world’s oceans.

Hey, Abdul-Malik Badr Al-Din Al-Houthi, how'd I do?

Thank you Mr. President, that's exactly what I meant. But why-

Another day, another banger

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
view more: next ›