LibreWolf

3133 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the official community for LibreWolf.

LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. If you have any question please visit our FAQ first: https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/

To learn more or to download the browser visit the website: https://librewolf.net/

If you want to contribute head over to our Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/librewolf

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
101
6
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by mefinity@lemmy.sdf.org to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml
 
 

Coming from Fedora to Debian Sid
Now Firefox Sync doesnt work

Update: I also cannot install addons via addons.mozilla.org
After tinkering around i noticed the browser's useragent is set to display as Netscape on Linux, which is strange

I have turned general.useragent.compatMode.firefox to true via about:config and it seems to work, i can use Firefox Sync and use addons now

102
 
 

Hey! I'm new to LibreWolf and before I was using Vivaldi's mouse gestures for long enough that they are hard coded into my brain. Problem is that the mouse gestures I'm using now (Gesturefy) doesn't work on new tabs since all extension are disabled there by default.

I'm assuming it's possible to give permissions for the extension through overrides.cfg, but this is where my technical abilities end. What do I need to add to the .cfg to make Gesturefy work on all types of tabs?

103
 
 

Librewolf is great, but now some stupid sites require chromium-based browsers to work. E.g: Microsoft teams.

  • Ungoogled chromium? problem is that it's worse in fingerprinting compared to Brave. See: https://privacytests.org/
  • Brave: bloated and filled with unnecessary features.

Why isn't there a Brave fork yet that gets rid of the crypto junk?

104
 
 

Linux has now hit 3% according to sat counter. It isn't has obscure as it was in the past and I think it is a lot less of a privacy risk.

I also know a significant number of Linux users who use librewolf. This means that the user share might be a bit higher

105
 
 

I have been using brave on endeavouros. But because of the shitty updates only about crypto wallets and brave ads I decided to switch to librewolf.

First thing I tried was extensions but I couldn't manage to export cookies(there were extensions to export them site by site but not all).

So I found brave cookies on ~/.config/BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser/Default/ directory. There was a Cookies named sqlite3 file, I convert it to json file.

Then I tried to use Cookie Quick Manager by Ysard but when I tried to import it from json file(also tried sqlite file) it just didn't work(nothing happened). And I couldnt find an alternative method to import.

So finally I decided to find the directory where librewolf stores the cookies to put the cookies by hand(I could convert it to whatever the file format librewolf using to store cookies) but I couldn't.

How can I import cookies from brave to librewolf?

Where does librewolf store cookies?

Note: I used AUR/yay to install the librewolf.

106
 
 

Librewolf can't access internet when AdNauseam is installed.

107
 
 

I'm in PoP_OS and I was having problems with using my YubiKey in the browser I read somewhere to put the browser in and out of safe mode and then the YubiKey would work. That did the trick in Firefox, but not in LibreWolf. Any ideas?

108
 
 

@librewolf what will librewolf do with all the new Firefox drama?

109
 
 

Is this also present on Librewolf? Or is it removed?

I don't like someone having remote control over what I'm using, and this seems to have some of it, according to Bug 1832791 - Add to AMRemoteSettings support for quarantinedDomains RemoteSettings entries.

If not removed completely, perhaps it can be a default config option on Librewolf, taking advantage on the opt-out made available through extensions.quarantinedDomains.enabled.

I don't know the implications on "security" by opting out, but for sure I don't want any of my chosen privacy extensions to be shut down for any specific site, even if it's not monitored by FF or whatever. Also, who decides what's insecure for which sites? Is there a Librewolf say about this "feature"?

More about it from Firefox 115 can silently remotely disable my extension on any site.

Edit:

Two issues were filed about this (already closed), Should allowing FF remote control over extensions (restricted ones) be disabled by default on Librewolf , and some work before v115, which are fixed on 115.0.1-2, through commit 2c561ca85dbf791d83da41ffab829afca8b19323, but not yet fixed on 115.0.1-1...

110
 
 

I am a new user to Librewolf and am curious about the community's thoughts on DNS over HTTPS in the browser.

111
 
 

Hi all, just a simple question: Why Librewolf is not packaged in Debian? It's a pity I have to add external repos or run the appimage. Cheers!

112
 
 

I tried disabling uBlock (although it's not blocking anything), but once I click "log in" the icon keeps spinning. I try from Brave and it works with no problems

113
 
 

I remember even a post for a firejail + apparmor suggestion, and the post about https://jeremmy.ml (which BTW seems down, and https://lemmy.ml/c/librewolf@jeremmy.ml leaves the subscription as pending, I guess it's down).

The more recent posts I see are really old I believe.

114
1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by hellfire103@sopuli.xyz to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml
 
 

I am a long-time user of LibreWolf, and I'm currently running Debian 11 "Bullseye". A new major version, Debian 12 "Bookworm", is due to be released on the 10th.

However, on the website, I have noticed that the only supported versions of Debian are bullseye and sid. I have also checked the repo itself, and found no mention of bookworm.

Will there be a repo for bookworm? If so, when? And is it safe to remain on the bullseye repo while running bookworm?

Thanks!

EDIT: Flatpak and AppImage are viable alternatives for me, but I'd prefer to use apt.

115
 
 

Looking into @librewolf and using the portable version on Windows but noticed it does not have #uBlock plugin like the full installer does.

I also cant reach the addons website for #firefox to install it either.

Is this intentional for the portable version? #librewolf

116
 
 

Here's one for the #timberwolffoundation and hey @librewolf How about this for a new @logo ?? #paintbynumber #ilovethisapp

117
 
 

Hey there,

do you know how to get touch screen gestures like two-finger-scrolling working on Linux? Its working fine on Firefox but probably disabled in Wolf due to potential privacy (sensor-detecting) issues? Could it be (re)activated with some config tweaks?

Fedora 38, Kernel 6.3.3 tried both X11 and Wayland Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP8

Appreciate any help!

Best wishes Pekingente

118
 
 

If you want to use a web browser on reasonable secure way, you could use firejail:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Firejail

It's not as powerful as @qubesos but it's well enough:

Eg.I run @librewolf with firejail using firefox profile:

firejail --x11=xephyr --xephyr-screen=1024x900 --net=wlan0 --seccomp --caps.drop=all --nonewprivs --noroot --profile=/etc/firejail/firefox.profile openbox --startup "librewolf"

119
 
 

I see this a few seconds after I try to open a link. It started happening all of a sudden a couple of days ago.

I tried setting GDK_BACKEND=wayland through Flatseal but that didn't help.

I'm using version 112.0-1 from Flatpak on GNOME Wayland. Any help is appreciated. TIA.

120
1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Jain@lemmy.ml to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml
 
 

When I click on a link (in an email) I get this pop-up error message

Close Firefox. Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To use Firefox, you must first close the exiting Firefox process, restrt your device, or use a different Profile.

I do have Librewolf (in Settings) as my Default browser and have removed Firefox from my software lists. It would seem that the links are thinking that Librewolf IS Firefox? When I click on Librewolf Support (in its settings) I end up at a page on Mozilla for Firefox. Any thoughts/suggestions? [I am currently using Zorin OS]

Does Librewolf have/want 'bug reports'?

121
 
 

r/privacy

I believe we have been enjoying this on Librewolf for some time already, :)

122
 
 

E' stato rilasciato un nuovo browser: "Mullvad browser", basato su firefox, è stato rilasciato da @mullvadnet e @torproject

:tor: https://blog.torproject.org/releasing-mullvad-browser/

E' un browser che consente a chiunque di sfruttare tutte le funzioni di privacy del browser Tor.

Pare un terzo incomodo fra @brave e @librewolf:

:tor: https://mullvad.net/en/browser

L'obiettivo è quello di offrire agli utenti la protezione della privacy di Tor Browser senza Tor.

#mullvad #tor #torbrowser #mullvadbrowser #mullvadvpn #firefox

123
 
 

FYI: Yeah, Librewolf is safe, unless the user disables resit fingerprint, which is enabled by default

124
 
 

Well, TechQuickie, but more people probably know about LinusTechTips umbrella.

125
 
 

A few useful #foss software and services:

@fedora - best #linux distro if you want stability and new software at the same time

@keepassxc - best offline password manager

@librewolf - best browser for #privacy and usability. It is what Firefox should be.

@libreoffice - best FOSS office suite with the most functionality

@protonmail - most trustworthy email service with E2E and Zero-knowledge encryption

@protonvpn - best choice for freemium #vpn service

#FollowFriday #fosserytech

view more: ‹ prev next ›