Latin American Publications!

120 readers
9 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
151
 
 

This article by Rocío González Alvarado originally appeared in the March 23, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

With more than 60 areas designated for community use, the Head of Government, Clara Brugada Molina, inaugurated the Mixiuhca Utopia, the first of 100 that she plans to build during her administration, based on an urban intervention model that seeks to bring recreational, cultural and welfare services closer to the population in less than 15 minutes.

After touring the facilities, Brugada stated that this space is the “birth of a new way of building cities,” based on social urbanism, community cohesion, and equal access to rights.

She noted that 100 Utopias will be developed in different parts of the capital, with the aim of guaranteeing the right to the city and reducing territorial inequalities. “Public space is not neutral; historical inequalities and neglect have accumulated there. The Utopias seek to reverse these conditions,” she stated.

The head of the local government highlighted that the model prioritizes care policies by offering infrastructure that reduces domestic burdens, particularly for women.

Built in the Magdalena Mixiuhca Sports City, Utopia unfolds over an area of ​​80,000 square meters and includes a semi-Olympic swimming pool, soccer, tennis and paddle courts, go-kart tracks, pump track and batting cages, among other training areas.

In addition, they highlight a Child Care and Development Center (CACDI), a community dining hall and laundry, a Day Center for Senior Citizens, and spaces for emotional health care.

In terms of healthcare, the complex includes general medical, dental, and gynecological clinics, a clinical laboratory, a mammography unit, and spaces for physical and sensory rehabilitation. It also features cultural spaces such as an auditorium with a capacity of over 400 people, open-air forums, art studios, and a community radio station.

In turn, the environmental component includes more than 48,000 square meters of green areas, pollinator gardens, and water and solar energy harvesting systems.

According to the Ministry of Public Works and Services, this complex will directly benefit 83,000 residents of at least 23 nearby neighborhoods, including Agrícola Oriental and Jardín Balbuena, and was designed to be accessible on foot in less than 15 minutes.

A second stage called City of Childhoods is planned, focused on interactive learning and educational recreation for girls, boys and adolescents.

The post CDMX’s Brugada Initiates First of 100 Utopias appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

152
 
 

This article by Bertha Becerra originally appeared in the March 22, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

“Dignity is not negotiable. The collective bargaining agreement ( CBA ) must be respected.” This was stated by Arturo Zayún González, general secretary of the National Union of Employees and Workers of Nacional Monte de Piedad (SNTNMP), 172 days into the strike at Nacional Monte de Piedad.

“We’re going to reach six months. The Board’s objective is to end and terminate the CCT, regardless of the time it takes.”

In an interview with El Sol de México, González accused the board of trustees of not caring about time. “They have no capital invested in the institution. That’s why they don’t care about the time or the millions in losses at Nacional Monte de Piedad. We’ve been on strike for almost six months and they don’t care,” he emphasized.

He recalled that “in previous years they had an average annual surplus of 12 billion pesos.”

The union leader, who represents more than 1,500 workers, accused the conflict of being driven by self-interest. “Their main objective is to preserve the exorbitant salaries they have never been willing to make transparent. And their primary desire is to transform the institution into a business masquerading as altruistim,” he emphasized.

The strike, which began on October 1, 2025, is a response to a series of violations of the collective bargaining agreement and administrative decisions that have affected the labor structure.

“To those who today have the task of dismantling our collective bargaining agreement and weakening the union representation that belongs to all of us, I remind you that it seems the administration of the Board of Trustees of Nacional Monte de Piedad suffers from acute mythomania and selective amnesia, as they expect us to forget the systematic attacks that have marked recent years. We do not forget,” said the union leader.

He recalled that they have not forgotten the dismantling of the workforce. “We haven’t forgotten the arbitrary dismissal of the appraisers, the elimination of eight job categories that left nearly a thousand workers unemployed, nor the unjustified firing of twenty union representatives.”

He spoke of the arbitrary closure of 18 NMP branches “and the mass dismissal of colleagues who worked in them.”

Daily Humiliations

He pointed out that regarding human mistreatment, “we do not forget the daily humiliations, such as forcing workers to eat their meals in secret.”

They also denounced the obstruction of career advancement within the private assistance institution (IAP). “We report that they have gone more than 10 years without offering training courses and more than five years without posting job openings.”

The above prevents workers from accessing higher salaries than they are entitled to based on seniority and directly affects their averages for retirement, savings fund, Christmas bonus and vacations.

Regarding the economic punishment, the general secretary recalled that the most recent aggression “is the stagnation of three years without a salary increase for the working base, which is added to the suspension of salaries for more than a year to the members of the National Executive Committee (CEN).

He also pointed out that regarding real transparency in the Institution, “while workers are being punished, the administration should make transparent the scandalous increases of 2024.”

He reported that “officials who already received high salaries benefited from increases of up to 35 percent. They went from 800,000 pesos to 6 million pesos annually.”

He also alluded to the sale of assets and asked leader Zayún González: “To whom are the gold, diamonds, and precious stones being sold?”

In the case of high-end watches, he said that “it is unacceptable that the discounts stipulated in the 2024 Agreement are not applied to the public; but when these items are concentrated or acquired by officials, discounts appear that call into question the legality of the operation.”

He said ironically: “If the administration insists on suffering from Alzheimer’s in its duties and mythomania in its speeches, we are concerned that this ‘disease’ will spread to the more than 1,500 workers, which would drastically increase the costs of the medical service.”

Bertha Becerra has six decades experience as a reporter and counting, and covers news from the world of work and agriculture.

The post Monte de Piedad Union Stands Firm: “Dignity is not negotiable” appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

153
 
 

This column by Hiroshi Takahashi originally appeared in the March 23, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

The document, which until recently was confidential, states that on October 1, 1963, the CIA station in Mexico City intercepted a call from Lee Harvey Oswald to the Soviet Embassy. The document describes him as follows: he called “using his real name,” spoke in “broken Russian,” and asked if there was “anything new” about a message sent to Washington . The name, the embassy, ​​the date, and the voice were all present. Mexico was also involved. What makes this discovery newsworthy is not just Oswald. This information, the report says, came from a wiretapping center that the CIA operated jointly with the Office of the President of Mexico.

The document states: “The CIA did produce a very significant piece of information about Lee Oswald before he assassinated President Kennedy. On October 1, 1963, our station in Mexico City intercepted a phone call Lee Oswald made from somewhere in Mexico City to the Soviet Embassy, ​​using his own name. Speaking broken Russian and using his real name, Oswald spoke with the embassy guard, Obyedkov, who frequently answered the phone. Oswald said he had visited the embassy the previous Saturday, September 28, 1963, and had spoken with a consul whose name he had forgotten, and that the consul had promised to send a telegram to Washington for him. He wanted to know if there was ‘anything new.’ The guard said that if the consul was dark-skinned, it was Valeriy Vladimirovich Kostikov. The guard consulted with someone else and said the message had been sent, but no reply had yet been received. Then he hung up.”

Record released by the CIA for Project LIENVOY, revealing a wiretap of former President Lázaro Cárdenas. Some of the CIA’s most extensive surveillance schemes had actually been proposed and operated by the Mexican state itself.

The report continues: “This information was obtained from a wiretapping center we operated jointly with the Office of the President of Mexico. It was a highly secretive operation and was unknown to Mexican security and law enforcement officials, who had their own center. Our joint center produces large quantities of wiretaps, which are transcribed and reviewed by our small staff in Mexico City. By October 9, Oswald ’s October 1 phone call had been transcribed, and a summary had been cabled to Washington. The name Lee Oswald meant nothing special to our station in Mexico.”

The President of Mexico was Adolfo López Mateos (1958-1964).

A CIA document reveals that the partnership with the Mexican government in spying on the Cuban and Russian embassies continued until at least 1994.

“In its original report of October 9, Mexico had stated that it possessed a photograph of an apparent American entering the Soviet Embassy on October 1, 1963, the day Oswald called there. A highly sensitive operation in Mexico City provides us with photographs secretly taken of many, though not all, visitors to the Soviet Embassy, ​​using telephoto lenses. Accordingly, on October 24, 1963, we cabled the Department of the Navy requesting a photograph of Lee Oswald from his Marine Corps days for image comparison. We had not received that photograph as of November 22, 1963, but in any case, it turned out that the man photographed outside the Soviet Embassy was not Oswald . By chance, none of our various photographic observation points in Mexico City had obtained an identifiable image of Lee Oswald.”

The document is dated December 13, 1963. John M. Whitten (a senior CIA official specializing in clandestine operations. In 1963 he was head of the division in charge of Latin America within the Agency), sent it as an “original, unexpurgated” version of the report on Oswald ’s stay in Mexico, with summaries of the wiretaps.

More than six decades later, the document conjures a scene that does not fit within the rhetoric of sovereignty.

The post The President of Mexico Who Spied for the CIA appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

154
 
 

This article by Arturo Rivero originally appeared at Lafuentelaboral on March 23, 2026 edition.

The Independent Union of Workers of Goodyear Mexico (SITGM) reported that the labor base approved a 5.8% increase directly to the tab with 420 votes in favor, 315 against and 17 nulls, as a result of the consultation conducted on March 20 and 21, 2026, with which the planned strike outbreak within the salary review process at the San Luis Potosí plant has no effect.

The voting was conducted by personal, free, direct and secret voting, according to the mechanisms established in the current labour legislation, which allowed the union majority to opt for acceptance of the economic proposal submitted by the company.

The union specified that, despite the signing of the wage agreement, the legal procedure before the Federal Labour Court for Collective Affairs remains in force, because the original petition file includes indications of alleged violations of the Contract Law and individual rights of workers.

Regarding the application of the increase, it was noted that the retroactive payment for the period from February 12 to date will be covered in the upcoming dates, while the update of the pay tab will be reflected in the payroll of weeks 13 or 14 of this year.

The post Goodyear San Luis Potosí Strike Ends with 5.8% Salary Increase appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

155
 
 

This article by Karla Mora originally appeared in the March 22, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

Residents and groups opposed to the World Cup in Mexico City announced that on March 28, during the reopening of the Estadio Azteca (Azteca Stadium) with the friendly match between Mexico and Portugal, they will hold demonstrations in the area.

Members of the Neighbourhood Assembly Against Megaconstructions are demanding an end to police and media harassment, stating that there is repression against their movement.

In a statement issued next to the Estadio Azteca, where they have been carrying out various activities for several months to express their disagreement with the World Cup, they pointed out that, despite the recently inaugurated works around the stadium, privatization and water scarcity continue in the area.

They asserted that the newly inaugurated Water Garden is “a bargaining chip” to prevent protests over water access in the area. Furthermore, they accused the Mexico City Water Management Secretariat of having promised, since its construction, to implement a joint project managed by the residents themselves.

They also point out that the agency did not provide technical details about the project, nor did it comment on the storage capacity. Similarly, there was no explanation as to why the rainwater harvesting infrastructure is located within the parking lot of Azteca Stadium, a private property.

“Within the meetings called by SEGIAGUA with the surrounding residents, they presented a series of properties that would serve to recharge the aquifer and that are even larger than the Rain Garden presented by the head of government,” the Neighbourhood Assembly indicated.

“One of these sites is the Teotongo property, where Clara Brugada once announced a theme park called ‘Coyoasauria’ to host the World Cup. All of the neighboyrhood proposals have been overshadowed bythe city authorities.”

The post Anti-World Cup Protests Announced for Mexico vs Portugal Match at Estadio Azteca appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

156
 
 

By Ben Norton – Mar 17, 2026

In response to Trump’s war of aggression, Iran is using asymmetric tactics, targeting US corporations and dollar dominance, challenging the petrodollar system, demanding oil sales in Chinese yuan.

Iran has responded to the war of aggression that the United States and Israel launched against it on February 28 by using unconventional tactics.

As the US and Israel systematically assassinate Iranian officials and bomb schools, hospitals, and residential areas, Tehran has defended its sovereignty by engaging in a campaign of asymmetric economic warfare, not only hitting US military bases in West Asia, but also targeting major US corporations, and even challenging dollar dominance.

After closing the Strait of Hormuz, the most important oil transit chokepoint on Earth, Iran has disrupted global energy markets and directly confronted the petrodollar system, demanding that ships that want to pass through the strait must sell their oil in China’s currency, the renminbi (also known as yuan), not dollars.

In this way, Iran has demonstrated that it is possible for a medium-sized country in the Global South to resist the US empire.

Iran’s asymmetric warfare
The United States has the most powerful military on Earth. It spends approximately $1 trillion on its armed forces every year, whereas Iran’s defense budget is less than $10 billion — that is, just 1% of that of the US.

Military expenditure of the US and Iran.

Military expenditure of the US and Iran.

Given the clear disparity in conventional military force, Iran recognized that it needed to engage in asymmetric warfare.

Iranian military strategists identified the weak points of the US empire, and they have cleverly targeted these vulnerabilities.

Immediately after the Donald Trump administration started this war of aggression, Iran retaliated, hitting the roughly two dozen US military bases hosted by the neighboring countries of West Asia.

Tehran also struck a major CIA station located inside the US embassy in Saudi Arabia, as well as crucial radar systems and several US Air Force refueling planes.

Iran is allowed to respond to the US-Israeli aggression, according to international law. Article 51 of the UN Charter guarantees the right of a state to self-defense.

Map of US military presence in the Middle East.

Map of US military presence in the Middle East.

Largest oil supply crisis in history
This was only the beginning of Iran’s strategy of asymmetric warfare, nevertheless.

In response to the US-Israeli war of aggression, Tehran closed the Strait of Hormuz, which the US government’s Energy Information Administration (EIA) has described as “the world’s most important oil transit chokepoint.”

Before this war, roughly 20% of the oil traded in the global market passed through this narrow strait on a daily basis.

Since the Trump administration launched this war of choice, traffic has ground to a halt.

Annual volumes of crude oil, condensate and petroleum products transported through the Strait of Hormuz.

Annual volumes of crude oil, condensate and petroleum products transported through the Strait of Hormuz.

A spokesperson for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said they will not allow “a liter of oil” to pass through the strait, until the US and Israel end their war of aggression.

“You will not be able to artificially lower the price of oil. Expect oil at $200 per barrel,” the spokesperson said, according to Al Jazeera.

“The price of oil depends on regional security, and you are the main source of insecurity in the region,” the IRGC added.

This US-Israeli war has created what the International Energy Agency (EIA) describes as “the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.”

The price of oil has skyrocketed from just around $60 per barrel in January 2026 to well over $100.

Brent crude oil prices.

Brent crude oil prices.

Iran challenges petrodollar system, demanding oil payments in Chinese yuanHowever, while Iran has shut down the Strait of Hormuz, it made an important exception.

Tehran has said that Chinese tankers are allowed to pass through the oil transit chokepoint, unimpeded.

This has led to some ships claiming to have commercial links to China, even if it is not always true.

Moreover, an Iranian government official told CNN that tankers can have permission to travel through the Strait of Hormuz if they agree to sell oil in China’s currency, the renminbi (or yuan), not US dollars.

Screenshot of CNN article saying Iran is considering allowing tankers to pass if oil cargo is traded in Chinese yuan.

Screenshot of CNN article saying Iran is considering allowing tankers to pass if oil cargo is traded in Chinese yuan.

This is what CNN reported on March 14 (emphasis added):

“Iran is considering allowing a limited number of oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, provided that the oil cargo is traded in Chinese yuan, a senior Iranian official tells CNN.”

This is an extremely important geopolitical development. It is a direct challenge to the global dominance of the US dollar.

The dollar is the most powerful weapon that the US empire has — much more powerful than its military.

The fact that the dollar is the global reserve currency, and that the US is the only country with the ability to print it, gives it what is known as an “exorbitant privilege.”

The US can run gargantuan deficits with the rest of the world — chronic current account deficits of more than $1 trillion per year — sucking in the goods and services produced by foreign workers, and it does not face the currency depreciation and inflationary pressures that other countries would suffer from, because there is artificial demand for the dollar, given its reserve currency status.

Balance on current account data.

Balance on current account data.

This exorbitant privilege also helps the US keep borrowing costs relatively low, as the dollars it sends abroad to pay for imports are often recycled by foreign investors into US Treasury securities and corporate bonds, thereby reducing yields and interest rates for both the public and private sectors.

Foreign investors similarly use these excess dollars to help inflate enormous bubbles in the US stock market, further enriching wealthy shareholders. (Around 90% of the stocks held by US investors are owned by the richest 10% of the population.)

One of the pillars of dollar dominance is the petrodollar system. Since the US made a historic agreement with top oil producer Saudi Arabia in 1974, the vast majority of global crude has been sold in dollars.

In other words, soon after US President Richard Nixon de-linked the dollar from gold in 1971, the gold standard was replaced with a de facto oil standard.

Almost all countries on Earth have to import oil, and this means that they need access to dollars to do so. And because oil is the most important global commodity, most other commodity markets are also priced in dollars.

This ensures an artificial global demand that strengthens the dollar, granting the US its exorbitant privilege.

Dedollarization
The United States has taken advantage of its “exorbitant privilege” to weaponize the dollar system, through the use of illegal unilateral sanctions.

The US has imposed unilateral sanctions on one-third of all countries on Earth, including 60% of low-income nations.

This increasing weaponization of the global reserve currency has incentivized more and more countries to seek financial alternatives.

In response to Washington’s illegal sanctions, Tehran has pushed for dedollarization for years.

China purchases the vast majority of Iran’s oil exports, and the BBC reported back in 2012 that Beijing has been paying in yuan.

Iran was admitted into BRICS in 2024, and it has advocated for a new currency for international trade. (Although some other BRICS members, namely India and the UAE, lean pro-Western and have opposed such efforts.)

Western sanctions have also motivated Russia, which is consistently among the world’s top three oil producers, to push for dedollarization.

About 20% of the global oil trade was done in other currencies, as of 2023. This was a marked shift compared to recent years, but it meant that 80% was still conducted in dollars.

Iran is now forthrightly confronting this system, using its geopolitical leverage over the Strait of Hormuz and the global oil trade to challenge the petrodollar.

Fears of global economic crisis
The Western financial press has warned that this war that the US and Israel started in West Asia could unleash a “global economic crisis.”

This is because oil is the most important commodity on Earth. Every country relies heavily on petroleum, and practically everything in a modern economy depends on it. The trucks, ships, and planes that are used to transport food and other goods use a lot of oil.

Therefore, as the cost of crude goes up and up, the prices of other products will rise as well, fueling inflation.

The Persian Gulf region is likewise a significant producer of fertilizers and the chemicals used in fertilizers, meaning this US-Israeli war of aggression could cause a global food crisis as well.

All of this was totally avoidable and unnecessary. But Donald Trump has defended his decision to start this war of choice. The US president insisted on his website Truth Social that the oil price shock is “a very small price to pay.”

US President Donald Trump's social media post on oil prices.

US President Donald Trump’s social media post on oil prices.

Rising gasoline prices and inflation just a few months before the November midterm election are really going to hurt Trump and the Republican Party.

This is why Trump is so worried, and so desperate to find a way to forcibly open the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump sent 2,500 more Marines and three more warships to West Asia, the New York Times reported on March 13. This was in addition to the more than 50,000 US troops already in the region.

Trump has also threatened multiple countries and demanded that they send their own warships to the Persian Gulf, to try to force open the strait. They have quietly declined, however, as they are afraid of getting further involved in the war.

Asymmetric economic warfare: Iran targets major US corporations in West AsiaUS Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent boasted that the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign of economic warfare against Iran aimed to “collapse” the country’s economy by cutting off oil exports, denying it hard currency, and fueling inflation.

Bessent even took credit for the extremely violent protests and riots that destabilized Iran in the weeks leading up the US-Israeli war of aggression.

Tehran has sought revenge for all of this by engaging in its own kind of guerrilla economic warfare, thereby giving the US empire a taste of its own medicine.

After hitting US military bases in West Asia and closing down the Strait of Hormuz, the Iranian military announced that it will target the offices of major US corporations in the region.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) published a warning with the addresses of these corporate offices, Drop Site News reported.

“We warn the American regime to evacuate all American industries in the region,” the IRGC said.

Screenshot of Drop Site News reporting a list of examples of US corporations warned to evacuate.

Screenshot of Drop Site News reporting a list of examples of US corporations warned to evacuate.

Among the corporations on the list were Lockheed Martin and Boeing, which are top Pentagon contractors and key parts of the military-industrial complex.

Also named were Silicon Valley Big Tech monopolies, like Microsoft, Oracle, and Amazon.

Furthermore, the IRGC mentioned US oil corporations like ExxonMobil, and financial firms such as Citigroup, KKR, and Bain & Company.

New Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei spells out Iran’s strategy to expel the US empire
The Iranian government has been quite clear about its goal: it wants to push the US empire out of West Asia.

This was spelled out by the new supreme leader of Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei.

Mojtaba Khamenei is the son of the previous supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, who was killed by the US and Israel on the first day that they launched this war of aggression, February 28.

In a speech on March 13, Mojtaba Khamenei said, “I advise the leaders of regional countries to shut down those [US] bases as soon as possible, for they must surely have realized by now that the US’s claims of ensuring security and peace have been nothing but lies.”

Shutting down US bases in the region will enable those governments to strengthen their ties with their own people, who are generally dissatisfied with the humiliating behavior associated with those bases,” he added.

It is not just US military bases that Iran is targeting, but also what Khamenei called “financial bases.”

He noted that, “for years, the enemy has been establishing military & financial bases in some of these countries to secure its dominance over the region.”

This was apparently a reference to the offices of major US corporations, which were told to evacuate by the IRGC.

“In any case, we will obtain compensation from the enemy,” Khamenei said. “If they refuse, we will take it from their assets to the extent we deem appropriate. If that wasn’t possible, we will destroy an equivalent amount of their assets.”

Social media posts by Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei about shutting down US bases.

Social media posts by Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei about shutting down US bases.

The supreme leader likewise vowed that his country will take “revenge” for the more than 175 children and teachers who were killed in a US military double-tap strike on a girls’ elementary school in the city of Minab in southern Iran on February 28.

Khamenei similarly promised to get revenge for his family members that died at the hands of Washington and Tel Aviv.

In his March 13 speech, Mojtaba Khamenei noted that, in addition to his father, the US and Israel killed his wife, his sister and her child, and the husband of another sister.

In order to seek revenge, Tehran will use all of the tools at its disposal, Khamenei insisted.

“The leverage of closing the Strait of Hormuz must definitely continue to be employed,” he declared.

“Studies have been conducted regarding opening other fronts where the enemy has minimal experience and where it would be highly vulnerable,” he added. “Should the war continue, activation of such fronts will be carried out based on certain interests.”

Khamenei did not identify what those “other fronts” are specifically, because Iran does not want to lose the element of surprise.

IRGC Destroys 55 Enemy Targets in 70th Wave of Operation True Promise 4

Nevertheless, it is quite clear that one potential front would be Yemen.

The northern part of Yemen, where the majority of the population lives, is governed by Ansarallah, also known as the Houthi movement.

Ansarallah is an indigenous Yemeni resistance group that is allied with Iran and strongly supports the Palestinian people in their struggle against Israeli settler-colonialism and genocide.

Drop Site News reported that Ansarallah is prepared to join a “coordinated campaign of military operations” with Iran, if Tehran deems it necessary.

Screenshot of Drop Site News reporting about Ansar Allah announcement.

Screenshot of Drop Site News reporting about Ansar Allah announcement.

The Ansarallah-led government in northern Yemen would likely seek to halt oil traffic in the Red Sea.

Given the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, Saudi Arabia has rerouted some of its oil exports via pipeline to its western Yanbu port on the Red Sea.

Yemen has the ability to shut down another important chokepoint, the Bab al-Mandab Strait, where close to 10% of global seaborne-traded oil transits every day.

Screenshot of EIA article about the Bab el-Mandeb Strait being a strategic route for oil and natural gas shipments.

Screenshot of EIA article about the Bab el-Mandeb Strait being a strategic route for oil and natural gas shipments.

This is not just hypothetical. Starting in late 2023, Ansarallah used its leverage to threaten to attack ships in the Red Sea, declaring that it would only stop when the US and Israel ended their genocide in Gaza.

In 2025, the Trump administration launched another war against Yemen, in an attempt to forcibly open the Red Sea.

In May 2025, the US was forced to sign a ceasefire with the Ansarallah-led government in nothern Yemen.

Yemen is the poorest country in West Asia. However, it was able to use unconventional tactics to fight the US empire, which boasts the most powerful military force on Earth and a $1 trillion annual budget.

What all of this demonstrates is that Iran and Yemen have mastered the art of asymmetric warfare, borrowing the tactics of Global South anti-colonial movements in the 20th century, to successfully resist the aggressive US empire.

(Geopolitical Economy Report)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

157
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—From March 20 to 21, the 10th Summit of Heads of State and Government of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) was held in Bogotá, Colombia. On Friday, March 20, the CELAC-Africa High-Level Forum took place, followed by the summit of heads of state on Saturday. During the summit, the pro-tempore presidency of CELAC was transferred to Uruguay.

In the summit’s final declaration, the member countries reaffirmed the validity of the Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace. This reaffirmation stems from a collective commitment to guaranteeing regional stability and respect for the sovereignty of its peoples.

However, Trinidad and Tobago was the only country that disassociated completely from this longstanding regional principle contained in paragraph number one of the final declaration. The Caribbean country, under the administration of Kamla Persad-Bissessar, according to analysts, has moved from having one of the most sovereignty-driven foreign policies to being an appendix of the US militarist and imperialist attempts to regain control over the region.

#CELACÁFRICA2026 “Yo le contestaría a Marco Rubio, que sé que no le agrado mucho, que la tesis fundamental de esta época de la humanidad no es como se define la civilización blanca, occidental y cristiana como las viejas cruzadas. Creemos que la cultura es sublime y la… pic.twitter.com/UueBjvazmN

— RTVC Noticias (@RTVCnoticias) March 21, 2026

In the first paragraph, most of the member countries reaffirmed the “full validity of the Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace and the unrestricted commitment of the CELAC member states to guarantee respect for this Proclamation by all States, as adopted at its II Summit of Heads of State and Government, held in Havana in January 2014, which recognizes the region as a zone of peace and free of nuclear weapons,” a foreign policy principle embraced by the region in recent decades.

In contrast with the final declaration of the last CELAC summit held in Santa Marta, Colombia, last November, which was plagued with multiple reservations, this one achieved more visible consensus; however, discrepancies remained.

Discrepancies and reservations
A significant number of member states expressed formal reservations regarding paragraph seven of the declaration, which calls for an end to the economic blockade against Cuba and opposes its designation as a state sponsor of terrorism.

A group of 11 nations—specifically Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago—explicitly disassociated themselves from this entire section. Furthermore, Guyana issued a targeted exclusion regarding the language opposing extraterritorial laws and the references to Cuba’s status on the terrorism-sponsor list. Peru also provided a clarifying note, stating that it maintains the position previously reflected in United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/80/4.

Beyond the consensus opposing the blockade against Cuba, other countries made specific exclusions concerning sustainable development, migration, and climate finance. Paraguay disassociated itself from paragraph 15, which outlines commitments to addressing global crises and ensuring the conservation of future generations through sustainable development. Argentina opted out of paragraph 22, which discusses the promotion of flexible financial instruments for climate change adaptation and mechanisms for debt sustainability. Additionally, Trinidad and Tobago excluded itself from a portion of paragraph 19, specifically rejecting the references to the importance of regional migration dialogue frameworks and the need to strengthen migration information exchange mechanisms.

Venezuelan peace diplomacy
Venezuela was represented at the summit by Foreign Affairs Minister Yván Gil. Acting President Delcy Rodríguez did not explain the reason for her absence.

The Venezuelan delegation made a strong call to consolidate a region free of economic sanctions and militarism. It emphasized that peace is not merely the absence of armed conflict, but rather the guarantee of comprehensive development based on social justice and mutual respect.

During his speech, Gil questioned the effectiveness of regional mechanisms without a collective response to external aggression, in reference to the bloody US military bombing of Venezuela on Jan. 3. “How can we speak of unity if we are incapable of forming a common front against collective sanctions like those suffered by the people of Cuba and Venezuela?” he asked, emphasizing that both nations are subjected to blockades, sanctions, and economic coercion without a decisive regional response.

Gil demanded the restoration of the legitimate rights of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, following the unjust and illegal kidnapping by US imperialism. “CELAC needs to shake things up, it needs to react, it needs to convene with historical urgency. What good is a regional organization if its heads of state do not fully enjoy immunity or if our capitals can be violated without a collective response?” he asked.

Minister Gil reiterated that the cohesion of the bloc should not be conditioned by political positions. “CELAC must move towards a firm position that allows us to build a region without illegal sanctions. It is time to break free from the shackles of petty interests. It is time to leave behind small calculations. It is time to act as a community with a shared destiny,” the Venezuelan top diplomat added, while asserting that “unity is not a slogan, it is a historical obligation and this is the moment to assume it.”

Additionally on Friday, Gil held a bilateral meeting with his Cuban counterpart, Bruno Rodríguez, reaffirming the brotherly ties that unite both Caribbean nations. In a social media post the top Venezuelan diplomat reported that they “reviewed the historical ties that unite Cuba and Venezuela, as well as the geopolitical situation of the region,” while reiterating Venezuela’s solidarity with the Cuban people in the face of the blockade they have faced for more than half a century.

Gil also congratulated Colombian Foreign Minister Rosa Yolanda Villavicencio for the achievements of the summit after holding a bilateral meeting where they highlighted the importance of regional integration and South-South cooperation. Furthermore, Yván Gil reaffirmed Venezuela’s firm commitment to strengthening and expanding binational projects that promote coexistence, trade, and cooperation between both peoples, aiming at strengthening a vibrant, productive, and peaceful border “based on mutual respect and shared development for the communities of Táchira, Zulia, and Norte de Santander.”

Xi Jinping: China an ally
In a video message addressed to those participating in the summit, the president of China, Xi Jinping, reaffirmed his nation’s unwavering commitment to the stability, development, and prosperity of Latin America and the Caribbean, emphasizing that the relationship between both parties has entered a phase of “deep and solid progress” that is generating tangible benefits for the peoples.

Xi recalled the success of the fourth ministerial meeting of the China-CELAC Forum, held in Beijing last May, where five strategic programs were jointly launched: Solidarity, Development, Civilizations, Peace, and Peoples. In his words, this roadmap has enabled close collaboration over the past year, strengthening ties in a complex global context.

The Chinese president was emphatic in positioning China as an ally in defending the self-determination of the region’s peoples. “China is and always will be a good friend and partner of Latin America and the Caribbean,” Xi said, underscoring the enduring nature of this alliance. He also reaffirmed that Beijing will continue to support the countries of the region in defending their sovereignty, security, and development interests.

South-South cooperation
The CELAC-Africa High-Level Forum also served to strengthen ties with African nations, seeking to build bold partnerships in critical areas such as clean energy, the pharmaceutical industry, and infrastructure. This alliance aims to diversify international relations and consolidate a multicentric and multipolar world, where multilateralism is the primary tool for addressing global challenges.

Inspiring Nuestra América Convoy: 600+ Activists Deliver Aid to Cuba, Defying US Blockade

During the forum, Minister Gil held strategic meetings with representatives from the African continent. On behalf of the Bolivarian Government, Gil noted that Venezuela’s participation in the CELAC-Africa High-Level Forum is fundamental to promoting peace, fostering the sovereign economic development of our peoples, and strengthening South-South cooperation between our regions.

Finally, Venezuela reiterated its commitment to Bolivarian diplomacy for peace, stressing that only through regional unity can it be guaranteed that Latin America and the Caribbean will continue to be a land of hope and stability for future generations.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/JB


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

158
 
 

Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics.

Solidarity Convoy Sails to Cuba with Humanitarian Aid From Mexican Waters, Telesur. The solidarity convoy ship called “Granma 2.0”, sailed from Mexico to Cuba today, March 20, carrying over 30 tons of humanitarian aid to counteract the intensified United States blockade and support the Cuban people.

CNTE advierte que sin diálogo “no rodará el balón” del Mundial 2026, Desinformémonos. La CNTE advirtió que al intensificar sus protestas durante el inicio de un paro nacional de 72 horas en la capital del país.

USW stands in solidarity with Mexican union after strikers shot on picket line USW. “In the early morning of Wednesday, March 18, striking workers on the picket line suffered an armed attack by a group of men that left four members of the union with gun shot wounds. Disturbingly, the attackers were found to be wearing company uniforms. The attack represents a chilling threat to the right to strike,” said Marty Warren, USW National Director for Canada.

José Romero, El T-MEC: dependencia en un mundo sin libre comercio La Jornada. Desde el TLCAN se prometió desarrollo. Se dijo que la apertura traería crecimiento sostenido, mejores salarios y convergencia con Estados Unidos. Nada de eso ocurrió.

Mexican president condemns deaths of citizens in U.S. custody: “This can’t be happening” CBS News. The Mexican government said Thursday that “these deaths are becoming unacceptable” and that officials “won’t hold back in using available legal and diplomatic tools to defend the rights” of Mexicans abroad.

Is this PRI President Alejandro Morena digging a mass grave for Palestinian children? The Senator posted pictures this week of a bizarre ceremony with Einat Kranz Neiger, the dishonourable ambassador of israel to Mexico.

Alito Moreno se alinea con Israel en plena tensión internacional El Soberano. El encuentro con la embajadora de Israel en México ocurre en un contexto internacional marcado por conflictos y cuestionamientos a la política exterior israelí, lo que ha generado críticas hacia el priista por su posicionamiento.

Mexico’s Femsa Cuts Jobs After Bid to Become Fintech Powerhouse Fizzles, Bloomberg. The cuts were part of a wave of about 1,300 workers who were let go across various divisions, including retail and Coca-Cola bottling.

Micaela Varela, Sheinbaum pide a Pemex reubicar el colegio cercano a la refinería de Dos Bocas tras el incendio El País. Los padres de los alumnos de la Escuela Primaria Rural Abias Dominguez Alejandro denuncian riesgos para la salud por la contaminación del aire

Sonia Corona, Mexico’s economy secretary: ‘Our vision in the USMCA is to reduce dependence on other regions’  El País.  Greer revealed in December that among the issues of interest to the United States regarding Mexico are economic security and guarantees that Mexico will not be used by countries like China as a gateway to the U.S. market; labor conditions in Mexico; and the restrictions the Mexican government has placed on energy companies entering the electricity and oil sectors.

Ofrece Lula alianza Petrobras-Pemex para explorar el Golfo La Jornada. “Compañera Claudia, ¿Usted sabía que Pemex puede recibir una gran ayuda de Petrobras para explorar petróleo en el Golfo de México?”

  • Clicks

    News Briefs

    Clicks

    March 22, 2026March 22, 2026

    Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including Cuba solidarity convoy sails from Mexico, CNTE 72 hour strike, Tornel workers shooting, USMCA dependency, ICE deaths, FEMSA cuts, PEMEX-Petrobras collab, & refinery fire.

  • The USMCA: Dependence In a World Without Free Trade

    Analysis

    The USMCA: Dependence In a World Without Free Trade

    March 22, 2026

    Mexico is beginning to adopt positions compatible with U.S. priorities not through sovereign decision, but due to the constraints of its own integration.

  • México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    News Briefs

    México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez assured.

The post Clicks appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

159
 
 

This article by José Romero originally appeared in the March 21, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

The USMCA is presented as a success. There’s talk of record exports, integration, and attracting investment. But this narrative obscures the essential point: we’re not facing a successful trade agreement, but rather a mechanism that has orchestrated Mexico’s subordinate integration for over three decades. NAFTA promised development. It was said that opening the economy would bring sustained growth, better wages, and convergence with the United States. None of that happened. Mexico exports more, yes, but it doesn’t grow, it doesn’t converge, and it doesn’t transform its productive structure.

The country has become an export platform deeply integrated with the United States. More than 80 percent of exports are destined for that market. This concentration is not a strength; it is a structural condition that defines what we produce, how we produce it, and for whom we produce it. Mexico has inserted itself into global value chains without building its own capabilities. It exports with high imported content, participates without control, and produces without decision-making power. The maquiladora industry has not disappeared; it has become more sophisticated, consolidating a structure that limits learning, innovation, and value creation.

This logic is not limited to manufacturing. In agriculture, liberalization reshaped production without building internal capacity. While an export segment managed to integrate, vast rural regions were left exposed to unequal competition. The massive influx of subsidized grains from the United States displaced domestic production of staple foods, weakened food self-sufficiency, and deepened territorial inequalities. A similar situation exists in mining: a dynamic sector in terms of exports, but with low domestic added value, few supply chains, and strong foreign capital control. Agriculture and mining reveal the same pattern: uncontrolled specialization and limited use of their own resources.

Mexico exports with high imported content, participates without control, and produces without decision-making power. The maquiladora industry has not disappeared; it has become more sophisticated, consolidating a structure that limits learning, innovation, and value creation.

For years, this model rested on a premise that is now untenable: that the United States led a stable free trade order. That world has vanished. Today, strategic protectionism, active industrial policy, and the use of trade as an instrument of power predominate. Programs like the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS Act reflect an economy that protects, subsidizes, and selects sectors based on geopolitical criteria. In this context, the USMCA ceases to be a trade agreement and becomes part of a strategic architecture.

The 2026 review will not be technical, but political. Mexico is not only commercially dependent on the United States, but is also beginning to align itself strategically without having chosen to do so. Integration is no longer driven by economic criteria but is instead conditioned by external decisions. However, the most profound implication is not economic, but political. The interplay between trade, technology, and security means that integration also shapes foreign policy. Trade dependence translates into strategic alignment. Mexico is beginning to adopt positions compatible with U.S. priorities not through sovereign decision, but due to the constraints of its own integration.

Mexico has chosen a path that is neither one of building its own capabilities nor of achieving strategic autonomy, but rather one of passive adaptation to an international architecture that subordinates it.

The pressure to exclude inputs or investments from third countries is not a response to a national strategy, but rather to external demands. Integration ceases to be an instrument and becomes a mechanism of control. Despite this, the internal response has been to preserve the treaty at any cost. This stance reflects the influence of sectors highly integrated into global value chains, in many cases linked to foreign capital. But these sectors do not represent the economy as a whole. The result is a structural bias: integration becomes an end in itself, displacing industrial policy and diversification.

Mexico cannot abandon the USMCA without significant costs, but neither can it continue substituting a trade agreement for a development strategy. Without industrial policy, technological development, and capacity building, integration reproduces dependency. And in an environment where trade is geopolitics, that dependency also becomes political. Mexico has chosen a path that is neither one of building its own capabilities nor of achieving strategic autonomy, but rather one of passive adaptation to an international architecture that subordinates it.

Under the guise of integration, the abandonment of defining a national development project has become normalized, and market access has been confused with productive transformation. The result is an economy that doesn’t grow, doesn’t develop, exports without learning, and integrates without making decisions. Mexico is not managing its subordination. It is not managing anything. It is surrendering, step by step, the very margins of its autonomy.

  • Clicks

    News Briefs

    Clicks

    March 22, 2026March 22, 2026

    Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including Cuba solidarity convoy sails from Mexico, CNTE 72 hour strike, Tornel workers shooting, USMCA dependency, ICE deaths, FEMSA cuts, PEMEX-Petrobras collab, & refinery fire.

  • The USMCA: Dependence In a World Without Free Trade

    Analysis

    The USMCA: Dependence In a World Without Free Trade

    March 22, 2026

    Mexico is beginning to adopt positions compatible with U.S. priorities not through sovereign decision, but due to the constraints of its own integration.

  • México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    News Briefs

    México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez assured.

The post The USMCA: Dependence In a World Without Free Trade appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

160
 
 

By Susana Khalil  –  Mar 15, 2026

Al-Qaeda is ruling in Syria today. I speak from anger and disgust, I speak from indignation and pain. Western savagery wants to turn Arab woman into trash.

Jeffrey Epstein governs in Syria today. There is partying in the anachronistic Eurocentric colony falsely called “Israel.”

It is a humiliation for every Arab and Persian woman to see Al-Qaeda ruling in Syria.

It should be a humiliation, an outrage to every woman and man in the world to see Al-Qaeda ruling in Syria.

There will be no free Arab-Persian world, nor free, sovereign, and democratic Kurdish and Turkish world as long as the Eurocentric colonial anachronism falsely called “Israel” exists on our ethnically Arab-Persian soil.

Not only will there not be a free, sovereign, and democratic Arab-Persian world, but the entire Arab-Persian ethno-cultural universe will be erased. The anachronism wants to make the Arab-Persian universe disappear. And if we do not fight like natives, we will disappear.

The Arab-Persian world is backward, retrograde, lagging, and savage for allowing the obscurantism of the Eurocentric colonial anachronism fraudulently called “israel” on Levantine-Palestinian soil.

We are the Arab-Persian world, we are that crucible, that mosaic of ancestral diversity and pluralism that “israel” wants to erase. The colonial project is to impose the “Greater Israel” through the falsification of history. One may say that this is absurd and impossible, and it is logical to say this, but we must understand that this goes beyond logic. Remember that the Arabs and Persians once said that it was absurd and impossible for a Jewish state to exist in Palestine. That absurdity became possible, and not only that, but it is the most powerful regime in the world. It is a regime that governs governments.

The ancient Arab-Persian peoples will be erased as long as that Eurocentric, Nazi-colonial anachronism, deceitfully called “Israel,” is embedded in our region. This is why the eternal war exists, this is why there are Arab tyrannies protected by the West, this is why there is a need to inject the poison of sectarianism into the rich crucible, the mosaic, the ancestral diversity and pluralism, for which we must reverse it by nurturing and promoting our ancestral diversity. We are not monolithic, because we are ancient peoples. It is for this reason that the West created the aberration of Al-Qaeda. Let us protect our peoples against sectarianism that only benefits the colonizer to subjugate and even exterminate us.

There are no democracies in the Arab world, but there is also no humanity in the ruling elite of the West when it comes to the otherness. Moreover, in the world, there is no popular participatory democracy but rather an accommodating representative democracy. Currently, there is a sadistic outrage against international law. It is then the time for armed struggle.

The Middle East (colonial name) is classified into: 1. Monarchical anachronisms, tyrannical ,in the service of the West. 2. Non-monarchical dictatorships in the service of the West, and if they do not submit to the exploitative, imperialist, colonial-Zionist West, they will be removed from their list of servile dictators, accused of being dictators.

In the Arab-Persian world, the problem is neither democracy nor dictatorship. To me, it seems artificial, demagogic, charlatan, instrumental, and above all criminal to address the issue of democracy and dictatorship without the chronic imperial, colonial-Zionist, and expansionist assault that the Arab-Persian world suffers from. The facts have proven it.

Syria’s Collapse: How Assad’s Fall Reshaped West Asia’s Strategic Balance

Democracy is a human value, we are morally eager for it in our crust of contemporary history and humanity. And since it is a human value, imperial cunning savagery turns it into its fetish.

Colonial Euro-Zionist fascism, through an esthetic liturgy, instrumentalizes and manipulates our humanity starting from the democratic ideal. They are dragging us, we let ourselves be dragged, longing for democracy. Democracy is what we will not have as long as we are inept, lazy people who only want to see the surface and not the substance. We are the useful idiots, as we are the ones who annihilate democracy.

Al-Qaeda in Syria. I speak from anger and disgust, I speak from indignation and pain, the Arab woman is trash… I am a Latina-Arab woman and I curse the perverse Western Zionist fascism.

Al-Qaeda did not exist in Syria, Al-Qaeda did not exist in Iraq. Today Syria is ruled by a monster, a beheader, a rapist of girls. A sinister figure who claims to have the “Islamic” right to rape a girl if she awakens or provokes his sexual desire. An inhumane Zionist who sees colonial “israel” as his friend. This Jeffrey Epstein in pseudo-Islamic wrapping claims that Iran and Hezbollah (worthy fighters against Zionism) are the enemies of Syria and not the Eurocentric colonial anachronism of “Israel.”

In Syria, a “dictator” was overthrown, not by the people but by the treacherous Arab dictators and the colonialism of Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the American empire, England, and Turkey. Yes, part of the population went out to celebrate, many knowing that what was coming was worse. Today, Syria, under Al-Qaeda, is a victory for Israel’s expansionist colonialism and a defeat for the dignity of the Arab woman.

Syria is the mother of the Levant, and we see that all this slaughter of the ancestral crucible and mosaic, of ancestral pluralism and diversity, the slaughter of Druze, Alawites, Christians, Shia Muslims, is the process of cultural genocide, memoricide, historicide to end the Arab-Persian world, to create the “Greater Israel.” Do you not see it?… Oh, democracy has arrived!

Filthy and vile is one who cries for justice for Palestine and flees from the suffering of my Syrian people. But beware, I will not let the enemy, that fascism, that inhumanity, that imperial and colonial atrophy capitalize on our internal crises and dialectics.

There is a shameless and marketing-driven left that talks about human rights without mentioning class struggle, inept individuals who do not address the imperialist inhumanity and Zionism that drives it.

There is a very criminal marketing-driven feminism that wants to protect its image and not to combat imperialism, as it is “tired” of the “imperial rhetoric.” It wants us to change the discourse even though the reality has not changed.

Al-Qaeda is a Western creation, an enemy of Pan-Arabism and the Arab-Persian woman.

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

SK/OT/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

161
 
 

The Nuestra América Convoy arrived in Havana on March 21, 2026, greeted personally by Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez. The international humanitarian mission converged in the Cuban capital to deliver essential supplies and reaffirm global support for the country amid intensified US economic pressure.

The convoy unites more than 600 peace activists from 38 nations, representing over 140 social, political, and cultural organizations across every continent. Participants include parliamentarians, judges, ambassadors, intellectuals, trade unionists, and community leaders committed to justice and sovereignty.

At the welcoming ceremony held at the Cuban Institute of Friendship with the Peoples (ICAP), the group handed over significant donations of food, medicines, hygiene products, medical equipment, and energy-related items like solar panels. These contributions aim to alleviate hardships caused by the long-standing US blockade.

President Díaz-Canel described the blockade as an “economic and energy asphyxiation” targeting the Cuban people. He expressed profound gratitude for the convoy’s courage and self-financed effort, noting that participants covered their own travel and stay expenses to maximize aid delivery.

David Adler, coordinator of the Progressive International and a key organizer, highlighted the mission’s scale. He emphasized that the convoy represents millions worldwide who reject collective punishment and demand an end to coercive unilateral measures.

The activists delivered a clear message: “Cuba is not alone.” They invoked Cuba’s historical internationalism—support for liberation struggles in Africa, Latin America, and beyond—now met with reciprocal solidarity under the slogan “Cuba sí, bloqueo no” (“Cuba yes, blockade no”).

Nuestra América Convoy strengthens global resistance network
The initiative, initially conceived as a maritime flotilla inspired by other humanitarian efforts, expanded rapidly into a multi-modal global convoy. Aid arrived by air from Europe and Latin America, with sea components following from Mexico.

Three vessels—the Granma 2.0 from Puerto Progreso, Yucatán, and two sailboats from Isla Mujeres—are en route, carrying additional tons of supplies. This Latin American contribution underscores regional unity against US aggression.

Participants stressed that Cuba’s challenges—blackouts, shortages, and infrastructure strain—stem largely from tightened sanctions and financial restrictions. The convoy’s direct aid bypasses these barriers, demonstrating practical internationalism.

Organizers declared March 21 an “International Day of Solidarity with Cuba”, calling for coordinated actions worldwide, including protests at US embassies. The effort builds on prior mobilizations and signals sustained pressure for policy change.

Geopolitical and regional implications
The Nuestra América Convoy reflects deepening Global South solidarity in response to unilateral coercive measures. In Latin America and the Caribbean, it reinforces CELAC principles of non-interference and regional self-determination, countering attempts to isolate progressive governments.

Globally, the mission challenges the normalization of economic blockades as foreign policy tools, highlighting their humanitarian costs and questioning their legality under international law. It amplifies calls in forums like the UN General Assembly—where annual resolutions condemn the US embargo—for multilateral respect of sovereignty.

The convoy’s convergence in Havana strengthens networks among progressive movements, trade unions, and civil society, potentially influencing future coordinated actions on issues like debt relief, climate justice, and anti-imperialist resistance. For Cuba, it bolsters resilience and morale amid ongoing crisis.

The Global Convoy to Cuba: Response to Washington’s Strangling of Cuba

Message of brotherhood and continued commitment
The welcoming ceremony featured expressions of mutual respect and shared struggle. Díaz-Canel reiterated Cuba’s readiness to collaborate on common causes, from health cooperation to sustainable development.

Activists reaffirmed their pledge to continue advocacy until the blockade ends. Many highlighted personal connections—family ties, cultural affinities, or admiration for Cuba’s achievements in education and medicine despite adversity.

As additional delegations arrive and aid distribution begins, activists highlight that the Nuestra América Convoy stands as a powerful symbol of people-to-people diplomacy. It demonstrates that solidarity transcends borders, offering tangible relief while pressing for systemic change in international relations.

Participants point out that in a world marked by polarization and power asymmetries, such initiatives remind us that collective action rooted in justice can challenge dominant narratives and support nations defending their right to self-determination.

(Telesur English)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

162
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)— The acting president of Venezuela and commander-in-chief of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB), Delcy Rodríguez, led the training cruise launch ceremony of the Simón Bolívar Training Ship on Saturday, March 21, in La Guaira, with a message of unity for the newly appointed military high command.

On its 36th Training Cruise, titled “Seas of Union for Bolívar’s Dream 2026,” the ship will carry a message of integration to Grenada, Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, Mexico, and Cuba.

During her speech, the acting president urged the crew and the new military high command to follow Liberator Simón Bolívar’s example of resilience after facing temporary defeats. “Bolívar suffered defeats and betrayals, but he always knew how to reorganize his forces to move forward. That message is clearer than ever for our Armed Force today,” said Rodríguez, who also linked this spirit of perseverance to the recent victory of the Venezuelan baseball team in the World Championship.

She emphasized that Venezuela’s true victory lies in national unity. “Our victory is unity, coming together, and consensus. I believe that we can definitively defeat hatred and intolerance so that reconciliation among Venezuelans prevails,” she stated before wishing the cadets “fair winds and following seas.”

Military reorganization after US invasion
During the ceremony, Rodríguez emphasized that the commitment of the FANB high command to the legacy of the Liberator is the pillar that guarantees the FANB’s cohesion in the face of any difficulty.

The Chavista leader stated that the new commanders must lead the institution with a work ethic that prioritizes discipline and honor. She explained that the recent change in the military leadership seeks to consolidate a strategic direction capable of emulating the perseverance of Simón Bolívar in the most complex moments of the independence war.

According to the acting president, the ability to reorganize forces in the face of adversity is the main lesson that the new military leadership must apply to ensure the stability of the country.

Venezuela’s pride and historical anti-imperialist stance was heavily hit by the bloody January 3 US military bombing of the country, causing the assassination of more than 100 people and the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, National Assembly Deputy Cilia Flores. Many in the country see the appointing of a new military command as a necessary step to reorganize forces amid the inadequate military response to the US military invasion.

Venezuela’s Acting President Appoints New Military High Command and Regional Defense Commands

Naval training and diplomacy
Under the command of Captain Carlos de Suze Santos, 216 crew members of the ship Simón Bolívar—including 120 cadets from the Bolivarian Navy—will travel more than 4,000 nautical miles on a 97-day training tour. This “floating school” will not only strengthen technical capabilities in nautical arts but will also serve as an arm of Bolivarian Peace Diplomacy in the Caribbean and Mexico.

Rodríguez emphasized that the training ship is a symbol of sovereignty that would carry the Venezuelan identity to every port where it docks. “Go forth, sail the seas, and return with the same courage and love for Venezuela. Carry the spirit of our father Simón Bolívar and his teachings of how to be statesmen and stateswomen,” the acting president wished.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SC


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

163
 
 

By Robert Inlakesh  –  Mar 17, 2026

Surprised by the intensity of Hezbollah’s retaliatory attacks against it, Israel appears to be pivoting to sow internal chaos within Lebanon’s borders in a bid to trigger a catastrophic civil war. An attempted coup against the Lebanese military’s leadership may be the catalyst.

At the beginning of May, the extent of the rocket and drone fire from Hezbollah at Israeli military targets struck Tel Aviv by surprise. However, the corporate media quickly constructed a narrative aimed at undermining the capabilities of the Lebanese resistance group and blaming it for the renewed hostilities, with the BBC running a headline entitled “Battered and isolated, Hezbollah drags Lebanon into another war”.

Despite this, the Israeli media quickly began to pull apart the concept that Hezbollah had been defeated, as the intensity of the group’s attacks appeared more intense than they were in past confrontations. “They’re selling illusions to the public,” an Israeli senior former security told Yediot Aharanot, regarding the narrative of Hezbollah’s defeat.

One of Israel’s leading think-tanks, ‘The Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center’ (ITIC), has also admitted that “since the ceasefire at the end of November 2024, Hezbollah has taken steps to enable it to recover from the blows of the previous war”.

“Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel Katz, and Eyal Zamir promised that the Hezbollah threat would be completely removed, that it would be disarmed. As you may recall, Israel failed to disarm Hamas, which is weaker, for two years”, wrote Haaretz’s Ravid Drucker, criticising the government’s failure to sufficiently weaken Hezbollah. Instead, he argued that the best off-ramp is to take the Lebanese government’s offer to normalise ties as the smart strategic option.

Manufacturing A Lebanese Civil WarFollowing the Lebanon-Israeli ceasefire of November 27, 2024, a major shift occurred in Lebanese politics. Joseph Aoun was selected to be its President, while Nawaf Salam took over as the nation’s Prime Minister; both the favoured picks of the United States.

Over the course of the following 15 months, Israel would go on to commit 15,400 violations of the ceasefire agreement, killing hundreds of Lebanese and even expanding their military occupation of the nation’s territory. During this time, PM Salam focused his efforts on pursuing a US plan to disarm Hezbollah, which was even passed by the Lebanese Cabinet in August of 2025.

In response, Hezbollah’s Secretary General, Naim Qassem, rejected the notion of handing over their weapons, arguing that doing so would rob Lebanon of its ability to resist Israeli expansionism and its threats to achieve “Greater Israel”. Instead, the Hezbollah leader called upon the government to carry out its duty to expel the foreign occupiers. Upon announcement of its entry into war earlier this month, Hezbollah expressed that it had given the government 15 months to address the daily Israeli attacks on their lands, but that their patience had worn thin.

Israel Kills Al Manar TV Journalist During Violent Attacks in Central Beirut

Provoking further criticism from the Lebanese public, Salam told CNN that “peace will lead to normalisation” with Israel and that he hoped it would come “tomorrow, not the day after”. Despite his attempts to address the backlash, by claiming his words were taken out of context, a Lebanese leader expressing his desire to see normalisation at a time of conflict was what drew scrutiny, not his abandonment of the need for a “Two-State solution” in Palestine.

During the ceasefire period, Trump administration officials consistently gloated over their power wielded regionally, triggering waves of backlash. During an interview, released in September of last year, US envoy Tom Barrack had smirked at the idea of the Lebanese Army being permitted to defend its territory from Israel and instead said Washington was arming them to “fight their own people.”

The CatalystWhen Hezbollah fired on Israel earlier this month, Lebanon’s Prime Minister immediately went on the offensive against the Party, labelling its attacks on Israeli targets as “illegal”. Under the PM’s authority and as Lebanon’s Capital was under fire, the government approved a ban on all Hezbollah military activity.

Standing in the government’s way of ordering a violent crackdown, has been the current Commander of the Lebanese Armed Forces, Rudolphe Haykal, who has resisted pressure to crack down on the forces resisting Israeli aggression. According to reports, Commander Haykal does not seek to crack down on Hezbollah’s weapons until the war is concluded.

The Lebanese Army even announced that they had participated in the foiling of an Israeli attempt to infiltrate the Bekaa Valley through a helicopter landing, leading to the summoning of the military’s leader. Pressure then began to mount from the US, France and Saudi Arabia to sack Commander Haykal. This has been resisted from within the leadership of the army, who have warned that the consequences could destabilise the country.

Prime Minister Salam and President Aoun have also reached out to initiate unprecedented direct talks with Israel, while France has proposed a plan that will involve Beirut’s recognition of Israel. US Senator Lindsey Graham, who exercises influence over the American President, has also since argued for the removal of the Lebanese Army’s top commander.

If such a coup against the leadership of the Lebanese Army does occur, then this could lead to another civil war inside the country and a possible fragmenting of Lebanon’s Armed Forces. Since the initiation of the latest war between Israel and Lebanon, over 800,000 civilians have already been displaced, as Israel has recently launched a ground invasion of the country.

Hezbollah’s ground forces are said to consist of 100,000 fighters, while the Lebanese Army is only around 80,000 strong. However, Lebanon’s Armed Forces aren’t allowed to possess strategic weapons and function as more of a domestic police force, due to US imposed restrictions.

It is unlikely that the Lebanese Army would remain intact if they were ordered to attack Hezbollah, as a large component of its fighters are speculated to sympathise with the Party that is resisting Israeli aggression. Although there is no census allowed, it is speculated that the Lebanese Army itself could be composed of between 25% to 50% Shia Muslims, the same sect as Hezbollah.

Another factor at play are the loyalties of tribal forces, especially in the Bekaa Valley area, who have historically fought alongside both Hezbollah and the Lebanese Army in protecting the nation’s borders.

Despite all of the factors at play, Tel Aviv is eager to use the current pro-US Lebanese government to fight Hezbollah on their behalf, seemingly without considering the possible outcomes.

(MintPress News)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

164
 
 

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) has announced the execution of the 70th wave of its underway retaliatory Operation True Promise 4, saying the latest phase targeted more than 55 locations occupied by the US and the Israeli regime across the region.

In a statement on Saturday, the IRGC described the opening moments of the latest phase as marked by “loud explosions, bursts of fire, and columns of smoke” throughout the targeted areas.

It said the timing of the strikes, on the eve of Eid al-Fitr, which marks the end of the holy fasting month of Ramadan, reflects “a different dawn of a new regional order for Muslims.”

According to the statement, five US military installations were targeted during the operation, namely al-Kharj in Saudi Arabia, al-Dhafra in the United Arab Emirates, Ali al-Salem in Kuwait, Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan, and the headquarters of the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain.

The Corps said the strikes were carried out using Qiam and Emad missile systems alongside attack drones, describing this stage of the reprisal as part of a broader strategy of “gradual attrition.”

Surprising enemy in occupied territoriesThe statement added that operations by the IRGC’s Aerospace Force concentrated on strategic zones in the occupied port of Haifa and the city of Tel Aviv. Among the locations mentioned were Hadera, Kiryat Ono, Savion, and Ben Ami.

It said Khorramshahr-4 and multi-warhead Qadr missile systems were deployed, resulting in impacts “beyond the enemy’s estimates,” and contributing to worsening conditions in the occupied territories.

Iran’s ‘Nasrallah’ Missiles Burn Haifa Oil Refinery, First Strike on US F-35 Recorded

Warning of intensified responseThe Corps reiterated its stance on retaliatory escalation, stating, “It is necessary at this stage of the war to once again remind that the IRGC, in its offensive strategy, will target the origin of any aggression against the Islamic Republic’s territory and national sovereignty with strikes beyond previous ones.”

The statement concluded by emphasizing that Iran’s Armed Forces, including the Corps, have prepared for this stage of the confrontation.

Operation True Promise 4 was launched shortly after the latest round of unlawful attacks by Tel Aviv and Washington against the Islamic Republic late last month.

US military positions throughout the region, including in Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan, have been subjected to sustained counterstrikes.

The retaliation has also struck sensitive and strategic locations across the occupied territories, including those lying in Tel Aviv, the holy occupied city of al-Quds, Haifa, Be’er Sheva, considered a technological hub, and the Negev Desert.

(PressTV)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

165
 
 

By Misión Verdad  –  Mar 20, 2026

Since the end of January 2026, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued a set of general licenses that partially modify the sanctions regime imposed on Venezuela, with a focus on the energy sector. These measures do not imply any lifting of the unilateral coercive measures, but rather a selective reconfiguration of the restrictions, primarily aimed at allowing specific operations related to oil, petrochemicals, and associated activities.

Between January 29 and mid-March, a series of authorizations has taken place that, together, expand the scope of action for companies—mainly US companies or those with previous operational ties—under conditions defined by the US government.

Issued licenses
The first of these measures was General License 46, issued on January 29, 2026. According to the US Treasury Department, this license authorizes “certain activities related to Venezuelan-origin oil.” In operational terms, it allows US entities to conduct transactions that were previously prohibited, provided they are “ordinary, incidental, and necessary” for the oil supply chain: extraction, export, transportation, refining, marketing, and resale of Venezuelan crude oil.

The license establishes specific conditions: only US companies established before January 29, 2025,  can participate, and the operations can directly involve the government of Venezuela or PDVSA as a counterparty. Additionally, it introduces financial control mechanisms, such as the obligation to report transactions and maintain traceability over payments linked to these operations.

Subsequently, in early February, complementary versions, such as General License 46A, were issued, expanding on the previous framework. This authorization allows the same US entities to participate more directly in activities such as extraction, export, refining, transportation, and sale of Venezuelan oil, including operations with PDVSA. In practice, this expansion consolidates a scheme in which specific companies can re-enter various segments of the oil chain under US regulation.

Thereafter, other licenses were introduced that expand the scope in the oil sector. Among them, General License 48, added to its complementary version 48A, authorizes the supply of goods and services related to the Venezuelan energy sector, including the technical and logistical support necessary for oil operations.

Later, on March 13, 2026, OFAC issued a new package that includes Licenses 46B, 48A, and 49A, which broaden the relaxation in specific areas. These authorizations extend the permitted operations to petrochemical products, fertilizers, and other derivatives, in addition to enabling the negotiation of contingent contracts for investments in the country.

In concrete terms, these licenses allow for transactions encompassing the export, import, storage, marketing, and transportation of oil and derivative products, such as fertilizers (urea, ammonia, nitrates), in response to international market conditions.

Other specific licenses have also been issued, such as License 50, which regulates the participation of international oil companies, such as Chevron, BP, Eni, and Repsol, in the purchase of Venezuelan oil or gas under conditions established by the US Treasury. Similarly, License 49A includes the possibility of establishing conditional investment agreements, which introduces an additional component to the contractual relationship with the Venezuelan energy sector.

Dynamics of OFAC Licenses for Venezuela: Managing a Sanctions Regime

A scheme of partial relaxation
The set of licenses issued between January and March 2026 shows an operational modification of the sanctions regime, focused on the energy sector and articulated through specific authorizations and not a general suspension of sanctions.

The observable pattern is cumulative: each license expands the scope of the previous one by incorporating new activities or sectors within a regulated framework. This is to reactivate segments of the energy value chain (production, marketing, and associated services) without dismantling the coercive control system that remains in place.

The result is a hybrid scheme in which formal sanctions and operational licenses coexist, enabling limited flows of economic activity related to Venezuela.

(Misión Verdad)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

166
 
 

The acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, made changes to the Military High Command of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB). The appointment of the new High Command, announced on Thursday, March 19, follows the appointment of General-in-Chief Gustavo González López as the new minister of defense. They will have “the firm commitment and patriotic loyalty to guarantee the sovereignty, peace, stability, and territorial integrity of the Republic,” the acting president stated.

Rodríguez appointed Major General Rafael David Prieto Martínez as the Strategic Operational Commander of the Bolivarian National Armed Force, who replaces General-in-Chief Domingo Hernández Lárez, who had held the position since July 2021.

Rafael Prieto Martínez had been serving as FANB’s inspector general since 2024.

Major General Jesús Rafael Villamizar Gómez was appointed as the second-in-command of CEOFANB. He had been in charge of the Central Strategic Region of Integral Defense (REDI) since 2024. He is one of the 21 officials sanctioned by the US regime in November 2024.

Major General Rubén Darío Belzares Escobar has been appointed as the commander of the Bolivarian Army, a position previously held by Major General Johan Alexander Hernández Lárez. The newly appointed commander previously served as the joint director of the Special Security Regime of CEOFANB and as the former commander of the Mérida Integral Defense Operational Zone (ZODI).

The General Command of the Bolivarian Navy will be led by Admiral Jorge Alejandro Agüero Montes. He served as commander of the Integral Defense Operational Zone (ZODI) in Nueva Esparta, as well as commander of the Coast Guard and the Naval School of Venezuela. He replaces Admiral Ashraf Andel Hadi Suleimán Gutiérrez.

The General Command of the Bolivarian Military Aviation will be held by Major General Royman Antonio Hernández Briceño. Since October 2024, he has been leading the REDI Los Llanos. He replaces General Lenín Ramírez Villasmil.

Major General Juan Ernesto Sulbarán Quintero will lead the General Command of the Bolivarian National Guard (GNB). This position had been held by Major General Elio Estrada Paredes since October 2024. The newly appointed commander served as the head of the REDI East. In October 2022, he was appointed by President Nicolás Maduro as the Sole Authority of Las Tejerías, Aragua. His mission is to lead the reconstruction of the locality, following the severe landslide caused by the heavy rains, which had claimed the lives of over 40 people.

The general commander of the Bolivarian Militia will be Major General Náyade Lockiby Belmonte. In July 2024, he was appointed the Sole Authority of Cumanacoa to address the damage caused by Hurricane Beryl in the region in Sucre state. He replaces Orlando Romero Bolívar.

Major General Dilio Guillermo Rodríguez Díaz has been appointed as the inspector general of the FANB.

On Thursday, Acting President Rodríguez ratified the appointment of Major General Henry Navas Rumbos as commander of the Presidential Honor Guard and Germán Gómez as head of the General Directorate of Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM). Since January 2026, these positions had been held by the now-minister of defense, General-in-Chief Gustavo González López.

Venezuela: Acting President Delcy Rodríguez Swears in New Ministers (+Culture & University Education)

Changes in REDI commands
On Friday, March 20, Rodríguez announced the appointment of new commanders of the Strategic Regions of Integral Defense (REDI). On January 21, just two weeks after the US aggression on January 3, changes had already been made to these regional commands.

“With these changes, we strengthen the operational capacity of the REDI, ensuring strategic defense, the protection of our communities, and effective coordination with the various citizen security bodies to safeguard all Venezuelans,” stated the acting president.

She announced that César Augusto Lugo Rivera will be in charge of REDI Capital, Ángel Daniel Balestrini Jaramillo will head REDI Central, Gustavo Adolfo Serrano Urdaneta will lead REDI Los Llanos, Erasmo Eduardo Iriza will be in charge of REDI East, Pedro Esteban González Ovalles will head REDI West, Pablo Ernesto Lizano Colmenter will lead REDI Los Andes, Wilfredo Alexander Medrano Machado will lead REDI Guayana, and Víctor Hugo Borjas Trujillo will be in charge of the Maritime and Insular REDI.

(Diario VEA) by Yuleidys Hernández Toledo, with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

167
 
 

Attorney Barry J. Pollack filed a memorandum of law before the District Court for the Southern District of New York under the docket S4 11-CR-205 (AKH), in support of the motion to dismiss all charges against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.

The central argument of the motion, filed on Thursday, March 19, is that Washington is actively violating the Sixth Amendment and the right to due process, guaranteed to every accused on US soil, by preventing Venezuela from financing the defense of its head of state.

The memorandum of law filed by President Maduro's defense before a New York court.

The memorandum of law filed by President Maduro’s defense before a New York court.

The documented facts reveal a sequence that the defense qualifies as direct political intervention. On January 7, President Maduro’s lawyers requested the necessary licenses from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the US Department of the Treasury to receive funds from the Venezuelan State.

On January 9, they obtained the licenses—Nicolás Maduro’s at 3:18 p.m. and Cilia Flores’ at 3:36 p.m. Yet, less than three hours later, at 6:05 p.m. on the same day, OFAC published an amended version of Maduro’s license that prohibited the lawyers from receiving that funding. Flores’ license was not altered.

This move contradicts OFAC’s historical practice. An expert testified under oath that, until this case, he had never known of an OFAC denial for such a request, irrespective of the sanctions regime against a state.

In this scenario, the defense warns that “if OFAC’s interference with Mr. Maduro’s ability to finance his defense persists, the undersigned attorneys will not be able to remain on the case, nor will Mr. Maduro be able to be represented by any other retained attorney.”

In that case, according to the defense, the court “would need to appoint lawyers and shift the cost of Mr. Maduro’s defense to US taxpayers, despite the provision and obligation of the Government of Venezuela to pay the costs.” This circumstance would make “any verdict against Mr. Maduro constitutionally questionable.”

Therefore, the defense states, “Mr. Maduro requests, in accordance with Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to dismiss the fourth superseding indictment against him.”

To that end, “Mr. Maduro alleges interference by the Government of the United States regarding his right to an attorney under the Sixth Amendment and his right to present a defense, as guaranteed by the Due Process Clause.”

Venezuela, legally obligated to pay for Maduro’s defense
The memorandum includes the sworn statement of Venezuelan jurist Henry Rodríguez Facchinetti, who certifies that Venezuelan legislation obliges the State to cover the legal expenses of its president. President Maduro himself declared under oath that he lacks the personal resources for his defense.

The argument rests on precise federal jurisprudence. The Second Circuit established in United States v. Stein (2008) that the government cannot interfere with the payment of fees by third parties without violating the Sixth Amendment.

According to that doctrine, President Maduro’s expectation of receiving Venezuelan State funding constitutes a legally protected property right.

License for oil, not for defense of President Maduro
What makes it more difficult to uphold Washington’s stance is that OFAC, the agency responsible for blocking the funds, has simultaneously made decisions that contradict it.

While OFAC was blocking funds for President Maduro’s defense, it authorized at least six general licenses for commercial transactions with Venezuela between January and February 2026.

General License 30B enabled port and airport operations, GL-46A authorized transactions with the Venezuelan oil industry, GL-47 allowed the sale of diluents, GL-48 enabled goods and services in the hydrocarbons sector, GL-49 opened investment contracts, and GL-50 authorized operations in the oil and gas sector.

On February 11, Attorney Pollack formally requested that OFAC reinstate the original license for President Maduro, giving a deadline of February 18. There was no response. Two days later, on February 13, the agency issued licenses GL-49 and GL-50.

US Empire Obstructs Venezuela’s Payments for President Nicolás Maduro’s Legal Defense

Illegally imprisoned in Brooklyn since January 3
The document specifies that on January 3, 2026, US special forces invaded Venezuela. The operation caused over 100 deaths according to Venezuelan government figures and led to the forcible kidnapping of Maduro and Flores, who were transferred to US territory.

Both were injured during the operation. Since his initial appearance in court on January 5, President Maduro has remained in solitary confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, awaiting trial for the Fourth Amended Formal Charge.

The OFAC blocking is not limited to legal fees. On January 23, the defense lawyers requested OFAC authorization to fund a trip to Venezuela for investigative purposes, essential to a case in which the alleged facts span 25 years and occurred entirely outside the United States. OFAC did not respond to that request either.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

168
 
 

This article by Fernanda Monroy originally appeared in the March 19, 2026 edition of Revista Contralínea.

The México te Abraza (Mexico Embraces You) program has provided support to 189,830 repatriated Mexicans since its implementation – January 20, 2025 – until March 18, 2026, reported the Secretary of the Interior (SEGOB), Rosa Icela Rodríguez.

During the presidential conference, the official detailed that, of the total number of nationals assisted, 154,072 entered by land and more than 35,758 by air.

She recalled that the México te Abraza strategy aims to offer comprehensive care to repatriated people, through accommodation, transfer to their communities of origin and access to welfare programs, health services, job placement, education and financial inclusion; and also highlighted that 34 Mexican government agencies are involved in the implementation, responsible for planning, operation, monitoring and evaluation, as well as the delivery of support and services.

The Secretary explained that the assistance process begins at 11 points along the northern border and at the airports in Villahermosa and Tapachula, where personnel from the National Migration Institute provide repatriated individuals with a Repatriation Letter, a document that grants them access to the program’s benefits. She added that they are also provided with food, phone calls, legal guidance, and information.

Secretary of the Interior, Rosa Icela Rodríguez

Regarding infrastructure, the Secretary noted that the program has eight care centers in seven states, with the capacity to receive up to 1,600 people per day ; currently, he said, there are around 200 people staying there. She added that these centers have served 130,414 people, of whom 94,656 were in the northern border region and 35,758 in Villahermosa and Tapachula.

The official added that those who choose not to go to these centers also receive support in the form of food, telephone communication, legal advice, and transportation to their places of origin.

In terms of results, she reported that the program has provided 382,087 meals, 142,121 transportation services , and 95,944 phone calls. 78,076 people have been provided with shelter.

She explained that, through the National System for the Integral Development of the Family , attention has been given to family units, including girls, boys and adolescents, with legal, psychological, health services and attention to violence, which has benefited more than 11,197 people.

Furthermore, she highlighted that 98,698 people have been affiliated with the Mexican Social Security Institute through a presidential decree, with the aim of guaranteeing access to health services for humanitarian and solidarity reasons.

The Interior Minister added that 93,232 certified copies of birth certificates and CURP (Unique Population Registry Code) have been issued, and that more than 114,800 people have received the Paisano Welfare card, which includes 2,000 pesos for travel expenses.

She also reported that 42,416 Mexican nationals joined Welfare Programs, while more than 13,697 people received advice on land regularization, agrarian issues and access to housing.

She also indicated that more than 30,932 remittance cards have been delivered through the Financiera para el Bienestar (Financial Institution for Well-being).

Finally, the Secretary noted that, to address any incidents, a Command Center was set up at the Secretariat of the Interior, where, she affirmed, there have been no incidents since the program began.

“Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” assured Rosa Icela Rodríguez.

  • México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    News Briefs

    México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez assured.

  • Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    Labor | News Briefs

    Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “It is not the union’s fault, but rather the intransigence of the authorities of this institution who have violated the provisions of our Collective Bargaining Agreement,” a union rep said.

  • Predatory Advertising

    Analysis

    Predatory Advertising

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    More normalized than the consumption of alcoholic beverages in Mexico is the consumption of soft drinks. This is because our country has been the victim of one of the most devastating forms of predatory advertising: Coca-Cola advertising.

The post México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

169
 
 

By Yader Lanuza  –  Mar 18, 2026

Since Hugo Chavez came to power in 1999, the US has attacked the Bolivarian Revolution in multiple ways, including through propaganda that categorize it as “authoritarian,” “unfree,” and “undemocratic.” This US propaganda assault is intended to dictate what should be done in Venezuela, including a return to “democracy,” with “free” and “fair” elections. Emboldened by the US military attack on Jan. 3rd, and relying on the US propaganda assault, the Venezuelan opposition has launched an aggressive move to seize control of the state by seeking concessions from the Bolivarian government to purportedly ensure “democracy” through “free” and “fair” elections that guarantees “equal” political participation for all political parties. But what does the opposition mean by “equality,” “fairness,” and “democracy”? What does that look like in the context of the recent and proposed legislative changes? And what are the consequences of pursuing these ideals, as defined by the US and laundered through the opposition, for most Venezuelans, especially the working class? 

The “equality” and “fairness” the opposition calls for is an unequal balance of political power to advantage the claims of foreign and national capital to Venezuelan assets, unfairly disenfranchising most Venezuelans from their resources (e.g., oil, gas, minerals, etc.), especially the working class. Therefore, the opposition’s claims to equality, fairness, and democracy – and the actions it entails – are assaults against the Bolivarian Revolution and most of the Venezuelan population. These attacks include performances of victimhood inside Venezuela and abroad by the opposition to hide the unequal and unfair neoliberal government they hope to install. The imperial left – self-professed “socialist,” “progressives,” or “leftists” in the West whose arguments and actions inevitably sabotage governments moving towards socialism – is helping the US and Venezuelan right-wing opposition launder their inherently unequal and unfair political program by undermining Bolivarian Revolution unity, which is the most important card Chavismo has to play to maintain power and hold out for a more propitious political moment, which might arrive in the aftermath of the US-Israel war against Iran. 

Enrique Marquez: Performing equality for an unequal worldThe Trump administration invited Enrique Marquez, a Venezuelan opposition leader, to the 2026 State of the Union address. With the flare of a Price is Right episode, Trump called Mr. Marquez, who was waiting behind closed doors, to “please come down!” Mr. Marquez appeared and received a standing ovation from the US congress, as the fake “interim president” Juan Guaidó had before him as part of the failed US attempt to remove President Maduro from power in 2019. This symbolic gesture articulated to Venezuelans that Mr. Marquez – and the kind of politics he embodies – is the US’s newly preferred path towards the removal of the Bolivarian Revolution from power. In a subsequent speech, Mr. Marquez said the following:

“The (Bolivarian) government has tried to eliminate the opposition. And the opposition has tried to eliminate its adversary (Bolivarian Revolution). Both destroyed the country. We cannot continue this way. I don’t see elections in the short run; thus, I am no candidate. I have a candidate – the constitution. My second candidate is called democracy. I will work so that my candidates win….I believe in a national unity government. I want to be the bridge.”

At first glance, the speech seems innocuous enough. However, in claiming to prioritize national unity, Marquez argued that the opposition and Chavismo are equally to blame for Venezuela’s difficulties. In this narrative, there are no clear victims or aggressors; Chavismo and the opposition are equally bad. This claim imposes a moral equivalence between these political forces by burying actual events – opposition and US-led illegal abduction, coup d’etats, freezing of Venezuelan assets, guarimbas, unilateral coercive actions, assassination and invasion attempts, attacks to state infrastructure, oil strike, etc. – that Bolivarian governments have had to defend themselves against since taking power. Because the Bolivarian Revolution prioritizes the interests of the Venezuelan working class, this equivalence eclipses the US government’s – and the foreign capital they represent – attack against most of the Venezuelan population to steal its resources. Moreover, in muddling a clear distinction between the victim (Bolivarian Revolution) and the aggressor (US empire, through opposition proxies), this equivalence narrative renders Venezuelan difficulties as solely the result of a national struggle, obscuring the US empire’s role behind it.

Thus, by nationalizing the struggle, thereby dimming its international/imperial dimension, and obscuring the US-aligned capital assault against the Venezuelan population to loot its resources, Marquez’s moral equivalence masks what it actually launders: an unequal claim to Venezuelan natural resources, such that the interests of US-aligned foreign capital (and their national proxies) should be prioritized over the claims of most Venezuelans to their resources. If said plainly – that a foreign rich person should have more of a claim to Venezuelan assets than most Venezuelans – it would be politically untenable, but that is what is actually being asserted, hidden as it is under smoke and mirrors of politically tractable “equal” blame for the country’s difficulties in a “national” political struggle for power. 

This is what Marquez – and the rest of the Western world, including the United States – calls democracy: a political system that pays discursive homage to “equality” among national actors, as it institutionalizes a (foreign) capital assault against the majority of the country guaranteed through an alternation of power with capital-controlled parties under the guise of “choice,” leading to dispossession for the working class. For neo-colonized countries, this “democratic” system limits most of the population from accessing state power and their national resources; in doing so, it jettisons any semblance of national sovereignty. In this vision of “democracy,” the state is nothing more than a vessel of capital interests, a neoliberal monster. In the current imperial context, this means that nation-states, including Venezuela, should facilitate US-aligned corporate exploitation and extraction of resources through its national proxies.

Given the power of capital interests represented by the US government, if the nation-state is to act on behalf of its citizens, it should be strong and not treat parties who represent foreign capital interests versus those who prioritize its national population, especially the working class, on “equal” footing. The Bolivarian Revolution understands that bourgeois democracy – through its discursive, cynical, and rhetorical calls to “freedom,” “equality” and “fairness” – all but guarantees failure for political movements representing the interests of the working class. The opposition’s call for equality and fairness are discursive moves to return to a representative and inherently unequal neoliberal democracy of the past. The Bolivarian Revolution, by contrast, envisions, prioritizes, and is building a participatory democracy, with communes taking direct reins of the state. This participatory democracy prioritizes the rights of most Venezuelans, especially the working class, to its national resources, not those of foreign capital interests. 

Representative bourgeois democracy does not work for most people, not even those living in the US empire. For instance, studies show that the priorities of most of the population are rarely reflected in legislation in the US, including the current war of choice against Iran, which most of the US population rejects. Laws enacted, usually passed on a bipartisan basis, mostly represent the interests of politicians’ corporate donors. Theoretically, every citizen has the same “equal” vote, but, in reality, rich people deploy their money to wield undue influence and hoard resources. Inside and outside Venezuela, the opposition’s discursive attack imposes a narrative that extols the superiority of an “equal” and “fair” (representative and neoliberal) democracy, exemplified in the US, in contrast to the “unequal” Bolivarian “autocratic” government. This is partly why, as I’ve written in the past, some in the Venezuelan diaspora support the illegal kidnapping of Maduro and celebrate the bombing of their birth country. 

Industrial Integration and the Impact of the US Blockade: Vida Café Economic Circuit (Part 3)

**Legislative equality?**Following the US attack that led to the illegal kidnapping of President Maduro and Cilia Flores on January 3rd, the Trump administration is forcing the Bolivarian government to make unfair concessions in their legal infrastructure, including the Law of Hydrocarbons. Trump boasted that the oil revenue generated under this law is going to benefit “both the United States and Venezuela,” but did not mention it would do so unequally. One of the concessions the Bolivarian government was forced to accept is that disputes arising between corporate capital and the Bolivarian state must be adjudicated in the US under its jurisprudence. Under the pretense, rhetoric, and propaganda of “legal equality,” the juridical infrastructure in the United States is heavily tilted towards capital interests. Thus, it comes as no surprise that the US government imposed its laws as the legal framework to adjudicate disputes between PDVSA, Venezuela’s oil company currently administered by the Bolivarian government, and US-aligned corporate capital. Because these corporations will be looking to extract as much profit as possible from contracts with PDVSA (and the Bolivarian state), by imposing US laws to adjudicate disputes, the Venezuelan people are likely to lose when disagreements arise, a form of resource theft and dispossession under the guise of an “equal,” “fair” – and, therefore, legitimate – “legal” process. 

While the Bolivarian government is agreeing to these terms under the barrel of a gun, these neoliberal schemes are central to the opposition’s political program. In other words, the opposition willingly prioritizes (US-aligned foreign) capital claims to Venezuela’s resources over those of Venezuelans, especially the working class. The different factions of the opposition differ in the extent and speed with which they want to impose neoliberal laws and priorities in Venezuela, but they agree with the broad political program. Maria Corina Machado, for example, has vowed to impose aggressive neo-liberalization in Venezuela with virtually no concessions from (foreign) capital. This is her vision of a “full democracy.” 

In another example, Rocío Guijarro, the director of the Centro para la Divulgación del Conocimiento Económico (CEDICE) is pushing a law to reverse “unfair” expropriations by Bolivarian governments, such that it would return assets to their previous “genuine owners,” and another law to further promote and protect “derechos de propiedad” (property rights). Both legislative projects aim to further prioritize the interests of capitalists in Venezuela’s legal infrastructure, including privatization. CEDICE does not acknowledge why these expropriations occurred. Neither does CEDICE propose laws that undermine the hoarding and unfair practices that abet private ownership and hoarding among elites, including labor abuses, wage theft, unequal employee-employer contracts, or corruption that funneled Venezuelan collective resources to private actors. Moreover, they are not proposing laws to guarantee accountability for millions of dollars belonging to the Venezuelan people which remain unaccounted for by members of the 2015 zombie National Assembly or by Juan Guaidó and the rest of his “interim” administration. 

Cynicism in the opposition’s discursive “equality” and “fairness” claim is also evident in the Amnesty Law. To prioritize national unity and peace, the Bolivarian government has pardoned thousands of people, some with documented severe crimes against their fellow citizens and the state, including guarimberos who, at the instruction of the opposition, wreaked havoc on the country to dislodge Chavismo from power. The opposition and the US (along with some of its allies) refer to guarimberos and other criminals as “political prisoners,” thereby portraying them as victims. Although some prisoners engaged in political activism, their incarceration resulted from illegal actions, including victimization of others, not political ideology. 

In ushering in the Amnesty Law, representatives from the Bolivarian Revolution have explicitly acknowledged errors they committed, and they have asked for forgiveness. By contrast, no member of the opposition has acknowledged the victims or asked for forgiveness for their crimes, and still, they are unilaterally pardoned. Neither the opposition nor their aligned media ever talk about Chavista victims of their violence, including Orlando Figuera, Giovanni Pantoja, Robert Serra, Maria Herrera and many others who were killed, injured, or otherwise harmed; they obscure these families’ suffering, as if it never happened. This is the “equality” and “fairness” the opposition wants with regards to amnesty. They receive pardons without offering restitution, even if symbolic. Henrique Capriles, for example, who is singularly responsible for guarimba mayhem, has yet to acknowledge or apologize for his role in fomenting violence. To add insult to injury, after being released, some beneficiaries of amnesty immediately renew calls that encourage confrontation on the streets, whose intention is to destabilize the country to precipitate elections in which they demand participation on “equal footing” to guarantee a “fair” and “democratic” process.

For the opposition, an “equal,” “fair,” and “democratic” process is one where the largely internationally isolated Bolivarian Revolution enters an election contest under a barrel of a US gun, facing military, political, and economic threats if they do not concede to US demands. For them, the elections should occur while the Bolivarian government is subjected to a barrage of negative propaganda through US-aligned opposition and Western corporate media seeking to fracture and weaken Chavismo from within. At the same time, for the opposition, an “equal,” “fair,” and “democratic” process for elections is one where they enjoy financial, political, economic, and diplomatic backing of the US (and the Western world), which will engage in every dirty trick in the book to ensure the opposition candidate emerges as the winner, fulfilling Marco Rubio’s preferred “democratic transition” for Venezuela. For the opposition, this blatantly unequal environment in their favor is what they term “equal,” “fair” and “democratic” context for elections. 

Even though the Bolivarian government has limited wiggle room to maneuver against a US empire hellbent on dropping bombs to guarantee compliance, the imperial left engages in moralistic and self-indulgent denunciations of the Bolivarian government for concessions made at gun point. Demanding either political martyrdom or a pure socialist utopia, imperial leftists discredit the Bolivarian Revolution, thereby undermining its support inside and outside of Venezuela, helping the opposition and its US overlords in the process. If the Bolivarian Revolution is fractured, the US will gain total control of Venezuela through unequal and unfair elections in which an opposition figure emerges as the winner. If so, the US will accomplish regime change with national and international legitimacy. To avert this outcome, the US must confront the stability and strength of Chavismo, which is only achievable through unity. 

Within Chavismo, lively debates, self-reflection, and planning are occurring in the context of necessary and iron-clad unity, but Bolivarian leaders, as government officials, cannot articulate these conversations and resulting strategies to the public. Imperial leftists have limited, if any, information to evaluate Bolivarian leadership decisions at this juncture. If anyone is equipped to maneuver during these difficult times, it is the current Bolivarian leadership. This is why there is a massive campaign by the Venezuelan opposition to remove Diosdado Cabello from the current Bolivarian government. 

Holding on to power now, buying time for opportunities in the futureThe United States attacked Venezuela with its military because it had exhausted all other means of removing the Bolivarian Revolution from power. The attack was a continuation of US aggression against Chavismo, moving the assault to a military domain, where the US is unequivocally advantaged. But even in that context, the US did not accomplish its goal of regime change. The Bolivarian Revolution’s strength allowed it to stay in power. In other words, the US threw all its military might against the Bolivarian Revolution but only achieved concessions from it. The US did not achieve the removal of the Bolivarian government. This is important because the current political juncture tends to be evaluated and judged from the point of view of the Bolivarian Revolution. What did it concede or lose? But it is equally true that the US, especially as represented by Marco Rubio, would rather have disposed of the Bolivarian Revolution and installed a puppet government with Maria Corina Machado at the helm. The US is being forced to sit with Bolivarian leaders who control the state, albeit in unequal terms. Despite its military might, the US, too, has had to concede, including by formally recognizing Delcy Rodriguez as the legitimate (acting) president of Venezuela, which may open opportunities for the Bolivarian government moving forward.

The US military supremacy, upon which current concessions are drawn from the Bolivarian government, is being tested. The US-Israeli war against Iran is not going according to plan for the US. It is unclear how this war will end, but, thus far, the might of the US military has encountered a forceful Iranian resistance. As in Venezuela, leadership decapitation has not achieved Iranian regime change. In contrast, it strengthened Iran’s resolve. The US military might encounter limits, and its strength is being re-assessed, if not questioned. Internationally, the war is facing political resistance, even among traditional US allies. On the US domestic front, the war is unpopular even amongst MAGA. If the war drags on, the US commits ground troops, and the economic fallout is felt more strongly among US citizens, the political consequences might cripple the Trump administration. 

The outcome of the war might usher an even more aggressive US approach against Venezuela, but it might, on the other hand, provide the Bolivarian Revolution wiggle room to maneuver on domestic and international fronts against US-aligned foreign capital. Thus, we cannot fall for the discursive assaults that deploy “equality,” “fairness” and associated “democracy” claims, through which the opposition is trying to seize power. This is a trojan horse against the Venezuelan people, especially the working class. Championing Chavismo unity, including support for the Bolivarian government leadership at this critical juncture, is imperative for the Left. It is up to the Chavista base – socialist party (PSUV) militants, people in the communes, and those organizing the streets – and its leadership to steer the direction of the Bolivarian Revolution. They will lead the way towards a substantively equal and fair Venezuelan society.

YL/OT


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

170
 
 

By Zoe Alexandra  –  Mar 19, 2026

The fuel blockade on Cuba imposed in January by the Trump administration has created a serious humanitarian crisis on the Caribbean island, but instead of breaking the backs of the Cuban people, it has inspired resistance and solidarity.

Driving from the José Martí International Airport to the Cuban capital, Havana, you are immediately struck by the emptiness of the major road. A few cars here and there, some refashioned motorcycles, resembling the Tuk-Tuks of Asia, but overall, there is a notable calm, an absence of movement.

This is not surprising given that over three months have passed since the last shipment of fuel reached the island. According to Cuban authorities, even before Trump announced the executive order declaring Cuba an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US national security on January 31, fuel shipments were already being blocked.

But what does it mean for no fuel to enter an island nation with very limited oil resources of its own and whose electrical grid runs on fuel? This means the limiting of essential services like transportation, education, and healthcare to millions of people. It means that Cuba has had to launch emergency plans in all sectors of life to ration the little fuel and energy they have.

In a public address last week, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel denounced that there are over 100,000 patients awaiting surgeries due to the fuel shortage, including children.

Let Cuba Live Youth Brigade arrives in Havana“What do you call a policy that specifically targets civilians and their ability to survive? What is that if not genocide?” Manolo De Los Santos, executive director of The People’s Forum, asked participants of the Let Cuba Live Youth Brigade. “30,000 pregnant women are being denied their right to comprehensive pre-natal care because of this blockade,” he added.

40 young organizers from across North America traveled to the island as part of the Let Cuba Live Youth Brigade. Hailing from organizations such as the Palestinian Youth Movement, Nodutdol: Korean Community Development, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, Feminist Collective in Construction, Artists Against Apartheid, and others, young activists have declared they are rejecting the “Trump administration’s genocidal siege against the Cuban people” and demonstrating their “solidarity and friendship against the growing threats of war.” Their brigade is part of the international solidarity mission called the Nuestra América Convoy. Hundreds of activists from across the globe traveled to Cuba from Italy, Colombia, Britain, Brazil, and several other countries, bringing with them several tons of urgently needed humanitarian aid.

In addition to the delivery of humanitarian aid, the international effort seeks to send a message of political solidarity, to affirm that the peoples of the world stand with Cuba, when many have turned their backs on it. In the last couple of months, Honduras, Guatemala, and Jamaica suspended their medical cooperation agreements with Cuba. While publicly the justifications for the move varied, it is hard to imagine that it was a coincidence amid the high-pressure campaign waged by the Trump administration.

Cuba’s Foreign Minister: Costa Rica Embassy Closure is Result of US Pressure

The Cuban people prepare to defend the revolutionAmid Washington’s maximum pressure campaign against Cuba, mainstream media outlets in the United States and across Europe and Latin America, have been falsely proclaiming the “fall of the revolution”. Anti-Cuba hawks like Marco Rubio have made flippant comments suggesting that he, and the United States are “ready” to “take over” Cuba.

While the moment is critical, the Cuban people profess a deep sense of pride, patriotism, and commitment to fight for their sovereignty and dignity, reiterating that they are open to dialogue but not to negotiate their sovereignty.

“We are ready to defend our land at any cost. This is the commitment of the young Cuban people,” said Mirthia Brossard of the Young Communist League of Cuba.

“This is not the end of the revolution; this is another stage. This is our Moncada, our Bay of Pigs. The young people of Cuba trust in the revolution and have confidence that we will overcome this moment … we are building the future with our own hands.”

On March 21, hundreds of international volunteers, including British MP Jeremy Corbyn, Belgian MEP Marc Botenga, Colombian legislator María Fernanda Carrascal, Irish rappers Kneecap, US rapper Vic Mensa, among others, will gather in Havana, Cuba, for a solidarity event.

(Peoples Dispatch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

171
 
 

This article by Carolina Gómez Mena was originally published in the March 20, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Armando Vargas Rodríguez, general secretary of the National Independent Union of Workers of the College of Baccalaureate (SINTCB), announced that in the absence of agreements to end the strike that began at the first minute of March 19, next week, union members will close various roads in Mexico City and the State of Mexico.

In a press conference, the union leader explained that this action is part of the agreements reached yesterday at the meeting of the SINTCB National Executive Committee. The action plan consists of three main points: continuing negotiations, launching an information campaign within the union to encourage workers to unite at all facilities and protect the established encampments, and blocking streets.

He explained that the purpose of closing avenues is to make the complaint of the workers of the College of Baccalaureate (Colbach) “as public as possible and for society to know the reality that our colleagues are going through.”

Because the institution has 20 campuses, 17 of them in Mexico City, three in the State of Mexico, plus two general offices, the protests will take place in the vicinity of those locations.

Because the institution has 20 campuses, 17 of them in Mexico City, three in the State of Mexico, plus two general offices, the protests will take place in the vicinity of those locations.

“The order is for each workplace to close a road near the facilities, and the other proposal is to close roads that are of great importance such as Periférico, Circuito Interior and Calzada de Tlalpan; we are planning to start on Monday.”

He argued that the work stoppage occurred because violations of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) persist.

“It is not the union’s fault, but rather the intransigence of the authorities of this institution who have violated the provisions of our Collective Bargaining Agreement. Day after day, workers at the different campuses and in the institution’s general offices have witnessed how directors and area managers infringe upon workers’ rights. As a result, and due to the workers’ frustration with this situation, they decided to call a strike for non-compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement.”

The leader emphasized that “we gave the authorities an opportunity to address our demands, but there were no responses. Because of this, we had to close the facilities at the first minute of March 19th.”

He commented that yesterday the Federal Conciliation Center summoned them to a meeting at the Ministry of Public Education. The Negotiating Committee attended the meeting and presented a proposal to the 14-point list of demands. “However, they didn’t convince us, because they didn’t come close to what we’re asking for, which is to respect the clauses in those 14 points.”

The meeting began at 7:00 p.m. and concluded at 2:00 a.m. “We discussed and analyzed each proposal, and the union presented counterproposals, but in the end, we couldn’t reach an agreement on the issues we were summoned to address. Today, the College of Baccalaureate Studies promised to send us a counterproposal; we haven’t received it yet, but perhaps it will be presented to us during the day.”

The Colbach has an enrollment of approximately 95,000 students and a teaching and administrative staff of 6,500 employees.

Among the union’s demands are the release of 241 administrative positions for hiring or internal processes; retroactive payment for changes in teaching categories to August 18, 2025; and the issuance of updated appointments for teaching and administrative staff.

Another requirement is the change in employment status of administrative staff covering temporary positions to permanent ones, in case of legal release of the position they occupy, and regarding the issue of schedules for teachers, in case of modification it must be done with prior notice and acceptance of the teacher and the Union.

Other topics include: delivery of materials and work clothes for the exercise, as well as prior training in subjects related to the profile, once the teacher agrees to teach them in a different Academy, in the following academic semester.

Likewise, justification of omissions of entry and exit at Campuses and General Office headquarters; no to the removal of the work material of the administrative staff hired by Colbach and payment of invoices for orthopedic devices and prostheses.

  • México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    News Briefs

    México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez assured.

  • Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    Labor | News Briefs

    Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “It is not the union’s fault, but rather the intransigence of the authorities of this institution who have violated the provisions of our Collective Bargaining Agreement,” a union rep said.

  • Predatory Advertising

    Analysis

    Predatory Advertising

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    More normalized than the consumption of alcoholic beverages in Mexico is the consumption of soft drinks. This is because our country has been the victim of one of the most devastating forms of predatory advertising: Coca-Cola advertising.

The post Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

172
 
 

This article by Alejandro Calvillo originally appeared in the March 21, 2026 edition of Sin Embargo.

As a society we are drowning in advertising, to such a degree that we do not fully distinguish it; we have no idea how it determines our habits, our choices.

Advertising has the capacity to abuse, to harm, to prey. We can affirm that the profound damage already affecting humanity and the planet would not have occurred without so-called “predatory advertising.”

The first time I heard the term “predatory advertising” was from Nicholas Freudenberg, author of the book Lethal but Legal, subtitled Corporations, Consumption and the Protection of Public Health.

Freudenberg points out that never before in the history of humanity has there been such a deep gap between the enormous economic and scientific potential that could provide better health for all and the reality of a world that is subjected to an epidemic of diseases and premature deaths that could be avoided.

It is precisely from this economic power, concentrated in the hands of a few, in enormous global corporations, that these epidemics of disease and death are being caused. This is largely due to the products of some of these global corporations.

The products now called the commercial determinants of health are the leading causes of illness and death. They are called commercial determinants because they are products that become highly affordable in the market; their high availability and the powerful advertising that positions them have led to their high consumption and the resulting health problems.

The practices of corporations that market these products have led to global epidemics. The power of these corporations, such as those in the tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food industries—including companies like Coca-Cola—has generated significant influence over all kinds of international and national organizations.

A clear example of the predatory advertising of these corporations can be seen in what we are currently experiencing with the World Cup, with the marriage agreement between the corrupt FIFA and the predatory Coca-Cola.

Let’s look at the case of predatory alcohol advertising, another product with profound health damage that, while providing enormous profits to large corporations, leaves enormous costs for health systems and family pockets, in addition to social breakdown and increased violence.

In the case of alcohol, current statistics show an increase in consumption among women, especially young women. The estimated costs of alcohol consumption in Mexico amount to 552 billion pesos, and the taxes paid by alcohol companies are about one-tenth of those costs: 57 billion pesos. Who reaps the profits and who pays the costs?

But how did women start consuming more alcohol? Alcohol corporations employ many marketing strategies; a key one is advertising, and there are numerous examples of how advertising has driven increased consumption, which is detrimental to health, especially when it comes to addictive products. This links alcoholic beverages to sugary drinks, tobacco, and junk food—products designed to be addictive. Data from the United States illustrates part of this strategy through advertising investments, as Freudenberg demonstrates in Lethal but Legal with the case of alcohol and its increased consumption among women.

The Copa Cola brand will bring us nothing good; it’s a legacy left by Peña Nieto, and this government has failed to distance itself from it prudently. We will experience the consequences: the further normalization of its consumption, its healthy image reinforced by its association with sports…it will become clear that there’s no “copa without cola.”

The following example is a good illustration of this strategy of capturing new consumers at a younger age. Diageo, the British multinational that is the world’s largest producer of spirits, began developing a type of product in the early 1990s that is now very prevalent in the Mexican market: “alcopops,” alcoholic beverages that mimic the characteristics of soft drinks; cocktails that mix alcohol with sweet-tasting, often carbonated, beverages; and drinks with artificial flavors like soft drinks, sold pre-mixed in cans and small bottles. These alcoholic beverages are available in all stores authorized to sell beer. In Mexico, they are found in all convenience stores and have the potential to expand into smaller, independent shops.

These beverages, which fall somewhere between an alcoholic drink and a traditional soft drink, have been described by experts as a strategic gateway to alcohol consumption for children. In other words, they are considered “gateway” drinks to alcohol. They are said to have a “masked taste” because the sweet flavor masks the alcohol’s flavor, and they are colorful and appealing to young people and women. Diageo lobbied heavily to have these drinks classified similarly to beer, thus gaining access to the market with far fewer regulations: lower taxes, more points of sale, fewer restrictions on sales hours, and fewer advertising restrictions.

Advertising spending on these mixed drinks from various brands jumped from $27.5 million in 2000 to $193.2 million in 2002, while consumption increased from 105.1 million gallons to 180 million gallons during the same period. A survey found that in 2001, 51 percent of 17- and 18-year-olds—below the legal drinking age of 21 in the United States—had already tried these mixed drinks, and a third of 14- to 16-year-olds had also tried them. The new product, with its appealing features for young people and the massive advertising investment, had quickly led younger consumers to start drinking alcohol. A similar situation occurred with e-cigarettes introduced by tobacco companies, which have led children to start vaping several years earlier than they typically start smoking. For corporations, it was a success; for public health, a disaster.

As a society we are drowning in advertising, to such a degree that we do not fully distinguish it; we have no idea how it determines our habits, our choices.

The corporations’ great success lay in having targeted women, who consumed significantly less alcohol than men and whom the alcohol industry considered a segment of the population with great potential for increased consumption. Following the design of these new products and their multimillion-dollar investment in advertising, it was found that girls and young women between the ages of 13 and 19 expressed a greater preference for these alcoholic cocktails than boys and young men. Another study recorded that in 2002, young women under the age of 21 were exposed to 95 percent more advertising for these types of products in magazines than women 21 and older. This situation, in which women have been the focus of advertising strategies for several years now, is already reflected in the increase in alcohol-related health problems among women, “including suicidal thoughts, osteoporosis, menstrual disorders, and some liver diseases.”

More normalized than the consumption of alcoholic beverages in Mexico is the consumption of soft drinks. This is because our country has been the victim of one of the most devastating forms of predatory advertising: Coca-Cola advertising. This predatory Coca-Cola advertising, along with its addictive nature and penetration strategies, has made our population the largest consumer of this brand on the planet, a fact that has significantly contributed to our having one of the highest rates of obesity and diabetes in the world. This advertising reaches another level with the World Cup, a tournament accompanied by the invasive advertising of this beverage. During its tour of the country, if you want to get close to the trophy, you have to give your information to Coca-Cola and agree to receive advertising, promotions, and information that this corporation wants to send you. In other words, the World Cup is a lure to get people to come, collect their data, and become the target of direct advertising strategies by the soft drink company.

The Copa Cola brand will bring us nothing good; it’s a legacy left by Peña Nieto, and this government has failed to distance itself from it prudently. We will experience the consequences: the further normalization of its consumption, its healthy image reinforced by its association with sports…it will become clear that there’s no “copa without cola.” Another aspect of predatory advertising is precisely the association of a product that is harmful to health with events and values ​​that allow it to masquerade as healthy, youthful, and happy, when what it actually produces is overweight, obesity, kidney and liver damage, bone loss, massive water extraction, and plastic pollution. This is predatory advertising, the very essence of the corporation.

Alejandro Calvillo is director ofEl Poder del Consumidor*, a non-profit civil association that works to defend the rights of the Mexican consumer*,as well as a sociologist with degrees in philosophy from the University of Barcelona and environment and sustainable development from El Colegio de México.

  • México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    News Briefs

    México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez assured.

  • Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    Labor | News Briefs

    Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “It is not the union’s fault, but rather the intransigence of the authorities of this institution who have violated the provisions of our Collective Bargaining Agreement,” a union rep said.

  • Predatory Advertising

    Analysis

    Predatory Advertising

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    More normalized than the consumption of alcoholic beverages in Mexico is the consumption of soft drinks. This is because our country has been the victim of one of the most devastating forms of predatory advertising: Coca-Cola advertising.

The post Predatory Advertising appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

173
 
 

This article originally appeared in the March 21, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva announced that he proposed to his Mexican counterpart, Claudia Sheinbaum, a strategic alliance between Petrobras and Pemex for oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico.

“Compañera Claudia, (…) Did you know that PEMEX could receive significant assistance from Petrobras to explore for oil in the Gulf of Mexico?” the president said during an event in Minas Gerais, referring to the phone call in which he raised the initiative. He highlighted the Brazilian company’s experience in deep-water production.

The Mexican government has not yet taken a position on the proposal. Brazil reached a record oil production in 2025, according to the National Agency of Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels, with exports totaling $44.6 billion.

Lula indicated that Petrobras will seek to repurchase the Mataripe refinery in Bahia, which was sold in 2021 during Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency. “It may take some time, but we will do it,” he affirmed.

Pemex projects a 34 percent increase in investments compared to 2025, with an emphasis on marine projects such as Trión, Sama and Maloob, in order to reach a production of 1.8 million barrels per day.

La Jornada contacted PEMEX regarding this proposal, but the company indicated that it would not comment at this time. Mexico’s Energy Secretariat did not respond to the request for information; neither did Petrobras nor the Brazilian energy company Acelen.

  • México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    News Briefs

    México te Abraza Program has Repatriated 189,830 Mexicans

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “Mexico is your home and we will always receive you with dignity and respect. Your country awaits you with open arms, and with all the services and programs to help you start over,” Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez assured.

  • Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    Labor | News Briefs

    Colegio de Bachilleres Union Will Close Roads in CDMX & Mexico State

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    “It is not the union’s fault, but rather the intransigence of the authorities of this institution who have violated the provisions of our Collective Bargaining Agreement,” a union rep said.

  • Predatory Advertising

    Analysis

    Predatory Advertising

    March 21, 2026March 21, 2026

    More normalized than the consumption of alcoholic beverages in Mexico is the consumption of soft drinks. This is because our country has been the victim of one of the most devastating forms of predatory advertising: Coca-Cola advertising.

The post President Lula Offers Petrobras-PEMEX Alliance for Gulf of Mexico Exploration appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

174
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) reported a new strike in the Eastern Pacific on Thursday, March 19. Although three survivors were reported, the total number of deaths from “kinetic strikes” on small boats remains at a staggering 152. This latest operation occurred as SOUTHCOM continues its aggressive maritime campaign, which critics and international legal experts have long condemned as a series of extrajudicial killings.

In its statement on Thursday, SOUTHCOM reported that Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a “kinetic strike” against a small boat in the Eastern Pacific, resulting in zero immediate fatalities and three survivors.

On March 19, at the direction of #SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a low-profile vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the low-profile vessel was transiting… pic.twitter.com/iK04PghbTM

— U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) March 20, 2026

Analysts have noted a disturbing pattern in recent months: individuals initially reported as “survivors” are almost invariably declared dead just days after the strike once search-and-rescue operations are terminated. Many analysts believe this will be the fate of the three individuals from the March 19 strike, as the US military maintains its lethal record against unarmed civilians on small boats.

While the US military characterizes these actions as counter-narcotics measures, international legal experts continue to label the policy as a campaign of extrajudicial killings. Critics point out that the summary execution of individuals on civilian boats—often designated as “vessels” rather than small boats to deliberately circumvent maritime protections—violates international law and the right to due process, with SOUTHCOM acting as “judge, jury, and executioner” on the high seas.

Statistical analysis
According to the latest data tracked by Orinoco Tribune, the death toll from these maritime operations remains at a grim milestone. Since the strikes began in September of last year, a total of 152 people have been murdered in 45 separate strikes, with a total of five survivors.

Trinidad’s Kamla Persad-Bissessar Named SOUTHCOM’s ‘Employee of the Year’ as Caribbean Death Toll Reaches 152

The statistical breakdown of the fatalities highlights the geographical distribution of the violence:

• Eastern Pacific: 95 deaths recorded in 31 strikes.
• Caribbean Sea: 57 deaths recorded in 14 strikes.

The data continues to reflect a near-total death rate. While the most recent strike on March 19 reported three survivors, search-and-rescue operations are typically terminated shortly after the “kinetic” engagement, frequently leading to the victims being presumed dead without trial, formal identification, or further public update.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

175
 
 

The acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, met with the outgoing military high command of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB) at the Miraflores Palace on Thursday, March 19, where she expressed her gratitude to the military personnel for their impeccable work within the ranks of the FANB.

The acting president was accompanied by the new minister of Defense, Gustavo González López, and by former Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López.

Venezuela: Acting President Rodríguez Appoints New Defense Minister, More Cabinet Changes

Rodríguez thanked Padrino López for his loyalty to the nation and his work at the helm of the ministry for over a decade.

The meeting was part of the institutional ceremonies for the change of the military high command, in which the strategic lines of security, defense, and national stability were assessed.

(Últimas Noticias) by Yusleny  Morales

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›