Latin American Publications!
A community for Latin American publications.
NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.
This capital city, which boasts the longest Carnival in the world, is hosting the second phase of the official competition for its most cherished popular festival at the Summer Theater.
At this open-air venue in Parque Rodo, murgas (street theater groups), comparsas (carnival troupes), revues, comedians, and parodists are performing.
Society criticism and current events are prominent, especially among the murgas, including messages of support for Cuba and rejection of the United States’ blockade against the island, particularly the cutoff of oil supplies.
One of the Carnival’s emblematic murgas expressed this sentiment on stage:
“The Diablos Verdes group wants to express its solidarity with the Cuban people in the face of the intensification of the economic blockade by the Donald Trump administration.”
“To prevent food, supplies, and medicine from entering a country is to condemn an entire people. That is why we, the Devils, say: No to imperialism.”
It was a declaration made during their performance that was met with enthusiastic applause from the audience.
The carnival delves deep into the heart of this city with the parade of comparsas (carnival troupes) along Flores Street and the stages erected in the neighborhoods, often by the residents themselves.
These nights, a document is being read at the Network of Popular Stages that states: “Cuba is suffering an energy blockade that is no longer a political debate; it is a direct attack on the most basic rights.”
abo/jav/ro/ool
The post Solidarity with Cuba resonates in Uruguayan carnival first appeared on Prensa Latina.
From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.
The Palestinian Presidency warned in a statement about the danger of the new plan by Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, noting that it violates international law and represents a threat to regional security and stability.
The statement considered the measure a dangerous Israeli escalation against Palestine and constitutes “the termination of the agreements signed” between the two parties.
Furthermore, it stated that it contradicts several UN Security Council resolutions on the matter, particularly Resolution 2334, which considers all settlement activity in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, illegal.
The president of the Palestinian National Council, Rouhi Fattouh, expressed a similar sentiment.
The leader considered the regulation and registration of lands in the West Bank to be an arbitrary measure, a large-scale plundering of Palestinian lands, “a de facto annexation and a direct invasion.”
Fattouh emphasized that this policy neither creates nor eliminates any rights; on the contrary, it openly contradicts international norms, particularly the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, “which prohibits the occupying power from making permanent changes to the occupied territory or confiscating the property of the population.”
He reiterated that the West Bank is an integral part of the Palestinian territory occupied during the 1967 war.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates stated that the Israeli decision is null and void.
abo/jav/ro/rob
The post Palestine condemned Israeli measure to annexate to the West Bank first appeared on Prensa Latina.
From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.
The US military seizes the 2nd oil tanker in the Indian Ocean linked to Venezuela.
From Presstv via This RSS Feed.
The first vice president of Venezuela’s National Assembly, Pedro Infante, wrote on social media that there is an attempt to “distort and manipulate the truth” regarding the batch of medicines received last Friday at the Simón Bolívar International Airport. It consisted of six tons of medicines allegedly donated by the United States.
Infante’s remark came in response to a comment made by far-right Deputy Henrique Capriles, who described the shipment of US medicine as “good news amid so many difficulties.”
Decades killing Venezuelans and now these gringo monsters believe we are going to forget that with a couple of air containers with medicines. 😡🤬😡 https://t.co/h647q9JrH5
— Orinoco Tribune (@OrinocoTribune) February 13, 2026
Deputy Infante stated that “Venezuela is grateful for the international support from several countries.” The legislator then listed some of the countries that have been donating medical supplies to the country in recent weeks after the atrocious Jan. 3 military attacks committed by the US.
“Brazil donated supplies to guarantee dialysis for Venezuelan patients for 5 months,” said Congressman Infante, who also expressed gratitude to the President of the United Arab Emirates, Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, for the donation of $3 million for hospital medical equipment.
“Yesterday (Feb. 13) we received a donation of $945,000 in outpatient medicine from the US; this is within the framework of Venezuela’s purchase of hospital medical equipment and medicine from this country for $140 million with funds released under the bilateral cooperation agenda,” wrote Deputy Infante, who emphasized the phrase “with funds released” in bold.
Venezuelan communication minister, Miguel Ángel Pérez Pirela, and the president of the National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, liked Infante’s post, among other high-ranked Venezuelan officials.
Orinoco Tribune’s editor, when consulted on the issue, noted that US imperialism has been starving and killing tens of thousands of Venezuelans via its illegal sanctions and blockade, and added that now they want to present themselves as good Samaritans by talking about an alleged donation, paid for with Venezuelan oil that they have stolen.
On Jan. 3, alongside the killing of approximately 120 people and the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, the US also bombed facilities in La Guaira state housing dialysis material worth months of Venezuelan dialysis needs.
Venezuelans have been reported as dying due to the disruption created by the lack of the medicines needed for dialysis before the arrival of the Brazilian donations.
(Ultimas Noticias ) by Eligio Rojas with Orinoco Tribune content
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/JRE/JB
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a US nonprofit organization based in New York City, has discontinued its annual Global Impunity Index, a decision that current and former staff members say was motivated by a desire to avoid highlighting Israel’s leading role in unpunished killings of journalists amid its genocidal war against the people of Gaza.
According to whistleblowers speaking to The Electronic Intifada, CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg canceled the index last August in a calculated move to prevent Israel from topping the list.
The Impunity Index, published since 2008, ranks countries by the rate of unsolved murders of journalists relative to population over a 10-year rolling period, serving as a key measure of accountability widely cited by the UN Human Rights Office and UNESCO.
The whistleblowers argue that Israel, already ranked second in the 2024 index (behind Haiti), would have surged to number one in the 2025 edition covering 2024, the first full year of Israel’s war on Gaza.
CPJ’s own data shows Israel to be responsible for the deliberate killing of dozens of journalists in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and Iran in recent years.
The Government Media Office in Gaza reports that Israel has killed more than 260 journalists and media workers since October 2023, making its onslaught deadlier for journalists than most major historical conflicts combined.
“Since the Impunity Index usually covers a timeframe of 10 years, Israel would have been ranked near the top, if not number one, for many years to come,” the whistleblowers stated.
They allege Ginsberg “couldn’t afford the heat” from CPJ’s board, pro-Israel donors, including those linked to Rupert Murdoch-owned publications and Israeli-linked firms, and pressure from Israel and its allies.
In an August email to staff obtained by The Electronic Intifada, Ginsberg proposed dropping the index, citing unspecified “flaws” in its methodology.
She noted that it only counts confirmed intentional murders, excluding many Palestinian journalists killed in what CPJ deems dangerous circumstances rather than targeted killings, despite evidence of Israel’s deliberate targeting of Palestinian journalists.
Instead of reforming the index to better capture such cases, Ginsberg suggested a “lighter lift” statement focusing on a few emblematic cases, which would avoid “intense focus” on dozens of cases requiring rights of reply.
CPJ’s eventual December statement highlighted five cases across various countries, giving equal weight to vastly different contexts and generating minimal media attention compared to the index’s usual impact.
The whistleblowers described widespread “deep disappointment, anger and resentment” among staff.
In response to inquiries, CPJ denied donor influence, stating the decision stemmed from a need to “radically change” its approach to impunity and prioritize accountability efforts, though it provided no specifics on new initiatives beyond existing advocacy.
‘Israeli’ Drone Kills Lebanese Journalist Ali Noureddine in Sour
CPJ’s website confirms the index is paused for review, with a 2025 statement noting the “unrelenting nature of impunity” and the need to adapt amid a “new landscape” for journalists, including over 125 killings in 2024 alone, most by Israel in Gaza.
The controversy follows a pattern of concerns over institutional handling of issues regarding Israel’s war on Gaza, including Omar Shakir’s recent resignation from Human Rights Watch after the suppression of a report on Palestinian refugees’ right of return.
Whistleblowers say the move undermines transparent, data-driven accountability for crimes against journalists, particularly in light of Israel’s unprecedented toll on media workers.
(PressTV)
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
This article by Arturo Sánchez originally appeared in the February 15, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.
The Cuban ambassador to Mexico, Eugenio Martínez Enríquez, expressed his emotion yesterday for the Mexican solidarity with the island and thanked the citizens for their response to the campaign to collect medicines and food organized by the Militant Solidarity Collective Va por Cuba and the José Martí Association of Cubans Residing in Mexico.
“I am deeply moved by the response to the call to help the Cuban people, who do not deserve the injustice and cruelty that the United States inflicts upon Cuba. Thank you is all I can say, for the generosity and humanity of the Mexican and patriotic Cuban people,” the diplomat declared.
“I am deeply moved by the response to the call to help the Cuban people, who do not deserve the injustice and cruelty that the United States inflicts upon Cuba. Thank you is all I can say, for the generosity and humanity of the Mexican and patriotic Cuban people,” the diplomat declared.

From early morning, the flow of people was constant. Young people, families, retirees, workers, office workers, and teachers arrived with bags, boxes, and packages to join the slogan that Cuba is not alone.
The collection center – located almost at the corner of Corregidora and Plaza de la Constitución – will remain open until February 22, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and accepts non-perishable food items, as well as essential medical supplies.
Francisco Rosas López, from the organizing group, described the response as “formidable.” He noted that although they had expected good participation, the volume of donations exceeded their initial projections. As he spoke, vans provided by the city government departed for a storage warehouse loaded with boxes and sacks.
Rosas emphasized that this is a “people-to-people” campaign that will later be supplemented by shipments from the federal government. She added that similar collection centers are being prepared in Puebla, Celaya, and other locations throughout the country, with the goal of expanding the solidarity network in the coming weeks.
Among the donors, anger toward Washington’s policies was a constant theme. Retirees María Paz Arroyo and Patricia Galicia arrived together with 60 kilos of rice, 60 kilos of beans, 20 packages of milk, and two boxes of sardines. “It bothers me that Trump is doing such awful things. We are Latin American countries, and we have to help each other,” said Arroyo.
Galicia, for its part, emphasized that its support is also a form of gratitude towards the Cuban doctors who have worked in remote communities in Mexico.
Additionally, graduate students from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) will open an extra collection center to support the island. Donations will be accepted on February 17 and 18 at the Graduate Studies Unit in University City, and on February 19 and 20 at Las Islas in University City, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Without fanfare, but with consistency, the day in the capital’s Zócalo showed an uninterrupted flow of support and a shared conviction: that Cuba, insisted the organizers and donors, is not alone.
-
Cuban Ambassador Expresses Gratitude for Mexican Solidarity
February 15, 2026February 15, 2026
The Mexico City collection center – located almost at the corner of Corregidora and Plaza de la Constitución – will remain open until February 22.
-
A Mexican Conspiracy Against the US?
February 15, 2026February 15, 2026
An interview with Morena’s Secretary for Mexicans Living Abroad, Alejandro Robles, on Peter Schweizer’s dangerous and deluded new conspiracy theory.
-
Clicks
February 15, 2026February 15, 2026
Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics. Kurt Hackbarth, Trump Is Using Mexico’s Oil to Put the Squeeze on Cuba Jacobin. The alternative, however, is to let Cuba starve: the process of Gaza-ification brought into this hemisphere. If this were to succeed, and Mexico were…
The post Cuban Ambassador Expresses Gratitude for Mexican Solidarity appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.
From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.
The Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs has formally protested to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) over Commissioner Rosa María Payá Acevedo’s recent visit to the country, which was conducted without prior notification to Mexican authorities.
In a statement released on Thursday, February 12, the Ministry stressed that IACHR members are required, under established diplomatic practice, to inform the host government of any official or private visits and the activities they intend to carry out.
The Ministry’s protest follows a report from the newspaper La Jornada on February 11, which revealed that Payá, a U.S. citizen of Cuban origin and an outspoken anti-revolutionary activist, had visited Mexico and participated in a January 22 forum at the University of Liberty. The event was sponsored by the right-wing Ricardo Salinas Pliego Center and featured other Mexican right-wing politicians, where Payá reportedly criticized the Cuban government.
The Foreign Affairs Secretariat emphasized in a statement that “in accordance with Article 12 of the IACHR Statute, the members of that body enjoy the immunities recognized by international law for diplomatic agents, therefore, there is an established practice whereby they must inform the Secretariat about the official or private visits that they undertake to our country, as well as about the activities they intend to carry out.”
Furthermore, the Ministry pointed to Article 4 of the IACHR Statute, which states that a commissioner’s post is “incompatible with activities that could affect their independence or impartiality,” implicitly questioning the nature of Payá’s public appearances in Mexico.
The Ministry confirmed that Juan Ramón de la Fuente’s office received no such notification from Payá Acevedo for her trip.
Mexico’s President Responds to Trump’s Threats Against Sending Oil to Cuba
Foreign Affairs Secretariat refutes IACHR’s criticisms of Sheinbaum
The undersecretary for North America at the Foreign Affairs Secretariat, Roberto Velasco, responded to the criticisms from US Republican Congressman Carlos A. Giménez against Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum regarding the Payá case.
“Claudia Sheinbaum was democratically elected by Mexico,” Velasco stated. “Our foreign policy is sovereign and based on historical principles. As I personally expressed, we do not seek confrontation, but we do want respect for our decisions and non-intervention. We remain open to constructive dialogue.”
On february 12, Giménez posted a message on X criticizing Sheinbaum, who the day before had questioned Payá’s presence at a forum against Cuban government. Without tagging the Mexican head of state, the Republican parliamentarian accused: “It is clear that Claudia Sheinbaum is nothing more than a puppet of the dictatorship in Cuba, controlled by Castro agents who are plundering Mexico. Sheinbaum’s slanders against opposition leader Rosa María Payá expose her worrisome collaboration with the regime.”
After Jornada published the news regarding Payá’s secret visit, President Sheinbaum was questioned about it on Wednesday, during her morning press conference, to which she replied: “If they come on behalf of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, they should not advocate for one cause or another, but only review the cases according to complaints.” She added that after learning about the situation, she requested a report from the Foreign Affairs Secretariat on the matter.
Payá Acevedo was promoted to the IACHR by US President Donald Trump, with the support of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, also of Cuban origin. She was elected as a commissioner of the organization on June 27, 2025, and began her duties on January 1 of this year.
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/DZ
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
Trump and his evil cabal of fascists have openly proclaimed their intention to dominate — or replace — Latin American governments, to rip off their resources, and to channel massive profits into the overflowing money coffers of US billionaire investors and CEOs.
Mexico is the biggest prize, but it’s not enough to threaten economic strangulation through tariffs or even military invasion under the thin claim that “cartels run Mexico,” — not that “lovely” but weak woman, Claudia Sheinbaum. Trump’s strategy also includes a psychological battle for the hearts and minds of the US public to win support for a takeover of Mexico.
That’s where writers and “researchers” come in. Recently, Peter Schweizer published what purports to be an exposé of Mexico’s conspiracy to subvert the US government.
Schweizer names names. “Among those dispatched to the US is Alejandro Robles… the executive secretary of the party’s National Committee of Mexicans Abroad… he was making trips, ‘meeting with militants, supporters, and Morena committees,’ according to his party’s account… Robles was sent to stoke resistance to Trump, meeting with migrants, both illegal and legal. ‘Our mission is to organize the militancy abroad’ [emphasis added by Schweizer], declared Robles.”
Schweizer also reports that Mexican Congressman “Cheto” Polanco, who lives in Los Angeles, “posted a video of Hispanic cops being harassed for doing their job and being disloyal to their ethnic heritage.”
Far from harassing “Hispanic cops,” Mexican Americans were defending themselves from the indiscriminate brutality of the ICE agents. In the MAGA blame-the-victim narrative, that makes them saboteurs threatening US sovereignty. Red alert! Mexicans are invading and boring from within!
Is Mexico plotting to overthrow the US government? Laughable, but Schweizer twists the facts to make the case. It’s business as usual: the pot calling the kettle black.
Alejandro Robles Gómez’s home base is the municipality of Coyoacán in Mexico City, but he lived in Canada and retains a residence there. His activist roots go back to the student strikes at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, or UNAM, in 1999/2000, when students resisted a massive tuition hike. He has served as a Congressional representative and in several other political positions. He is now the Secretary for Mexicans Living Abroad for the Morena party. He always advocates for human rights, migrant rights and uplifting the poor.
Trump broadcast that The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon by Peter Schweizer is one of his new favorite books. What’s to like?
It fits like a glove into Trump’s narrative and is music to MAGA ears.
As a right-wing writer, Schweizer’s role is to promote Trump’s white supremacist agenda of ridding the US of non-white immigrants and conquering Latin America. This book should be listed under “fiction”! He wrote it to provide “evidence” that migrants are part of a criminal conspiracy to attack the US. Schweizer, like many in Trump’s circle, profits from our pain. It’s dishonest, disgusting — and dangerous.

You are specifically mentioned in the book. What does he say about you?
Among other accusations, he quotes from remarks I made at the People’s Forum in New York City in 2025. He didn’t like it when I said many Mexicans have been “Americanized.” He doesn’t consider any of us to be “real Americans.”
I also criticized the Mexican government, which in the past failed to acknowledge its citizens living abroad. Many Mexicans in the US had no country to belong to — no welcome or rights in the US and ignored by Mexico.
But since the Morena government took office in 2018, that attitude has switched. We now publicly call migrants heroes and thank them for their enormous contributions to both the US and Mexican economies through their labor and remittances. Morena is the only party to have a Secretary for Mexicans Living Abroad. My job is to reconnect Mexicans to Mexico and to let them know we don’t forget their needs. But Schweizer portrays my trips across the border to meet with migrants as subversive, as if I am recruiting them to work against the US.
His accusation that I turn migrants into “militants” — people with revolutionary intentions — is based on a Spanish word I used, “militancia.” He doesn’t understand Spanish! In Spanish, a party “militant” simply means someone active in a party.
Does Morena try to push its own agenda by operating in the US?
We leave it to Claudia to handle US/Mexico relations.
But when it comes to exposing the political operations of Mexicans living in the US, it’s dishonest that Schweizer doesn’t mention Mexico’s right-wing party, the PAN.
Francisco Cabeza de Vaca, former governor of the state of Tamaulipas, lives in the bordering US state of Texas. He was named PAN’s representative in the US.
You’d think the Trump administration would be concerned that Cabeza de Vaca has been accused of having ties to cartels, but no. Why? Because PAN’s agenda for Mexico is that it wants US intervention! It’s the only way the PAN party could ever return to the presidency. PAN is so unpopular that even its 2024 presidential candidate, Xochitl Galvez, has not signed up for membership in their recent party recruitment drive!
Sweizer alleges that the 53 Mexican consulates in the US conspire to undermine the US government. Is this credible?
Absolutely false! He says it’s suspicious that Mexico has so many consulates when the UK has eight and China has five, but Mexico’s population in the US of 40 million — 1 million born in Mexico — requires a lot more consulates than those other countries.
Working in a consulate is a career job, like a civil service job in the US. Consulate staff must take courses and pass an exam; only the head of the consulate, appointed by the Mexican government, is a political appointee.
Their duties include helping to process passports, advising Mexicans of their rights and running Mexican elections in the US.
Today, about two-thirds of consul staff began their jobs before Morena won in 2018. You know these longtime staff aren’t organizing Mexicans, because I hear constant complaints that they are not sensitive to the needs of Mexicans in their regions.
And while the new hires since the 4T began have a different way of working, focusing on serving and defending migrants, they are not there to act like the CIA does in Mexico!
In Minneapolis, ICE agents forced their way into the Ecuadorian consulate. Will they attack the Mexican consulates?
The Geneva Convention of 1949 established the rules of international humanitarian law, and it’s entirely illegal to forcibly enter a consulate, an inviolable institution under the Consular Relations Convention. The ICE agents are ignorant of the law. They are bounty hunters — it’s said they get $1,000 per head, so they figured they could bag some game at the consulate.
Ironic that it was the Ecuadoran consulate because Ecuador itself broke the law when it entered the Mexican consulate and arrested a former official who had been given asylum there. What goes around comes around! But given that Ecuador is a good friend of the US, why was it targeted? Well, it wasn’t targeted! The ICE agents don’t know foreign affairs. Ecuador, Argentina, Honduras and Chile have presidents friendly to Trump — but that doesn’t matter to ICE agents. All brown people are Mexicans!
Does being named in the book put your own life in danger if you try to enter the US?
Yes. We all fear the immigration interview when we enter the US. I could be in front of a racist agent, complete with these prejudices, and if they googled me and found the Schweizer accusations against me, they could deny me entrance or maybe confiscate my visa. Not being able to travel to the US will definitely make it harder for me to do my job.
The US has many Morena chapters, and Schweizer mentions this too. They also will be more at risk of an ICE raid if they have a meeting.
Pressure on Mexico is building. What does Trump want from Mexico?
President Sheinbaum has a boot on her neck. She’s a great diplomat, but the pressure is increasing. We wish that oil shipments to Cuba would continue, but we understand the dilemma in light of Trump’s determination to get rid of the Cuban regime.
I believe we must avoid the danger to the future of the 4T: we must continue with domestic reforms and implement “Plan Mexico.” In the long run, the reforms are necessary to strengthen Mexico to withstand US threats.
Right now, Trump wants complete control of Latin America as a reassertion of the Monroe Doctrine. He’d love to appoint the president of Mexico, as he’s doing in Venezuela, or have hard-right presidents like Noboa in Ecuador, Milei in Argentina, Bukele in El Salvador and now Kast in Chile — he’s meddled in all those elections to make it happen. If any country is conspiring to oust presidents, to foment unrest or to murder people they don’t like, it’s not Mexico. We need to turn the camera back on Schweizer and Trump.
How can those of us in the US support Mexico at this moment?
Resist!
Meizhu Lui’s experiences as the daughter of Chinese immigrants and as a single mom led her to focus on addressing inequalities based on race, gender, and immigration status. A hospital kitchen worker, she was elected president of her AFSCME local. She coordinated the national Closing the Racial Wealth Gap Initiative, and co-authored The Color of Wealth: The Story Behind the U.S. Racial Wealth Divide. Liberation Road, a socialist organization, has been her political home.
-
A Mexican Conspiracy Against the US?
February 15, 2026February 15, 2026
An interview with Morena’s Secretary for Mexicans Living Abroad, Alejandro Robles, on Peter Schweizer’s dangerous and deluded new conspiracy theory.
-
Clicks
February 15, 2026February 15, 2026
Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics. Kurt Hackbarth, Trump Is Using Mexico’s Oil to Put the Squeeze on Cuba Jacobin. The alternative, however, is to let Cuba starve: the process of Gaza-ification brought into this hemisphere. If this were to succeed, and Mexico were…
-
When Governing Becomes Managing
February 14, 2026February 15, 2026
Silence can be tactically useful, but it doesn’t resolve underlying tensions. It only postpones them. And when those in power postpone strategic decisions for too long, they end up trapped in their own caution.
The post A Mexican Conspiracy Against the US? appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.
From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.
Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics.
Kurt Hackbarth, Trump Is Using Mexico’s Oil to Put the Squeeze on Cuba Jacobin. The alternative, however, is to let Cuba starve: the process of Gaza-ification brought into this hemisphere. If this were to succeed, and Mexico were to cede on an issue so symbolically important to its self-conception of sovereignty, the Trump administration would truly smell blood.
Fernando Camacho y Andrea Becerril, Morena abre centros de acopio de ayuda humanitaria para Cuba La Jornada. Respecto a la propuesta del senador Emmanuel Reyes de donar un mes de su dieta, el líder de la bancada del guinda comentó que el próximo martes en la reunión previa a la sesión, van a discutir ese punto y su propuesta será que se establezca una cantidad mínima y que de ahí hacia arriba, cada legislador done lo que considere “de acuerdo con sus convicciones, sus valores, el concepto que tenga solidaridad, de apoyo al prójimo en situaciones tan difíciles como la que enfrenta el pueblo cubano”.
Pablo Meriguet, Mexico sends shipment of humanitarian aid to Cuba People’s Dispatch. Mexico, for its part, announced that it was engaged in negotiations with the US over oil shipments.
Nancy Flores, Semarnat retira denuncia penal contra Grupo México por Río Sonora Contralínea. Fuentes consultadas explicaron que la autoridad ambiental puede reactivar en cualquier momento la acción penal contra el Grupo México, si éste incumple alguno de los acuerdos.
Mexican Airlines Keep Flights to Cuba Telesur. Mexican airlines confirm continued flights to Cuba by carrying round-trip fuel, despite a month-long aviation fuel shortage affecting the island.
Bárbara Zamora Los Acuerdos de San Andrés: 30 años de una deuda histórica La Jornada. Treinta años después de la firma de los Acuerdos de San Andrés, el Estado mexicano sigue en deuda con los pueblos originarios.
Emiliano Rodríguez Mega, Cartel’s Seized Ammunition Is Traced to U.S. Army Plant, Mexico Says NY Times. About 137,000 .50-caliber rounds have been seized since 2012, and of those, 47 percent came from a plant in Kansas City, Mo., Mexico’s defense secretary said.
EZLN y colectivos expresan su respaldo a Cuba ante amenaza arancelaria de Trump Resumen Latinoamericano. Aluden que el proyecto denominado “Nueva Gaza”, presentado en la reunión de los millonarios y poderosos en Davos, “es en realidad una declaración de principios: destruir y despoblar diferentes regiones del mundo, para ser reconstruidas y reordenadas por y para el capital.”
Mexico Approves Gradual Transition to 40-Hour Workweek Telesur. The Mexican Senate unanimously approved a constitutional reform on Wednesday, February 11, reducing the workweek from 48 to 40 hours, to be implemented gradually by cutting two hours per year until 2030.
SEP acepta excesos contra Marx, pero niega que quiso borrar la Guerra Sucia de libros Sin Embargo. En un comunicado, la SEP reiteró que la Nueva Escuela Mexicana continuará y señaló que se investigará el uso de policías para tratar de desalojar a Marx Arriaga.
-
Clicks
February 15, 2026February 15, 2026
Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics. Kurt Hackbarth, Trump Is Using Mexico’s Oil to Put the Squeeze on Cuba Jacobin. The alternative, however, is to let Cuba starve: the process of Gaza-ification brought into this hemisphere. If this were to succeed, and Mexico were…
-
People’s Mañanera February 11
February 11, 2026
President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on social housing, measles vaccination, USMCA and Trump, and flights to Cuba.
-
Unions Warn 40 Hour Workweek Reform Could be “Paper-Only”
February 11, 2026
Multiple unions raised concerns over the maintenance of a six day workweek, overtime pay reduction and an increase in tax burdens for workers.
The post Clicks appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.
From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.
The United States military is preparing for the possibility of sustained, weeks-long aggression against Iran if US President Donald Trump orders it, two US officials told Reuters, signaling the potential for a far more serious attack on Iran.
The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the planning, said preparations go beyond limited, one-off strikes and could evolve into a prolonged campaign depending on developments. The disclosure comes amid renewed diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran over Iran’s nuclear program.
Diplomacy underway but US military buildup expands
US and Iranian diplomats held talks in Oman last week in an attempt to revive negotiations, even as Washington expanded its military presence in the region.
According to US officials, the Pentagon has deployed an additional aircraft carrier to West Asia, alongside thousands of troops, fighter aircraft, guided-missile destroyers, and other assets. Speaking to US troops at a base in North Carolina on Friday, Trump acknowledged alleged difficulties in reaching an agreement with Tehran.
“It has been difficult to make a deal,” Trump said, adding, “Sometimes you have to have fear.”
“That’s the only thing that really will get the situation taken care of,” he stated.
When asked about preparations for a potentially sustained military operation, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said, “President Trump has all options on the table with regard to Iran.”
“He listens to a variety of perspectives on any given issue, but makes the final decision based on what is best for our country and national security,” she said.
Last year, the United States deployed two aircraft carriers to the region and launched an aggression on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran responded at the time with a calculated retaliatory strike on a US base in Qatar.
US expects potential back-and-forth
Officials told Reuters that the current planning is more complex. In the event of a prolonged aggression, US forces could target Iranian state and security facilities in addition to nuclear infrastructure, according to one official who declined to provide further details.
Meanwhile, experts continue to warn that any large-scale confrontation with Iran would carry significant regional risks and put US troops in the region at risk. Tehran possesses an extensive missile arsenal and has repeatedly signaled that it would respond to attacks on its territory, whether the aggression is limited or sustained.
Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) has warned that in the event of strikes on Iranian soil, it could retaliate against US military bases throughout West Asia. The United States operates military facilities in Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, and Turkiye, as well as anti-missile batteries in occupied Palestine.
One US official told Reuters that Washington fully expects Iranian retaliation in the event of a strike, potentially leading to back-and-forth attacks over an extended period and increasing the likelihood of a broader regional conflict.
President Trump has repeatedly threatened an aggression against Iran. On Thursday, he warned that failure to reach a diplomatic solution would “be very traumatic, very traumatic.”
The US Keeps Openly Admitting It Deliberately Caused The Iran Protests
Netanyahu pushes for aggression
The remarks of US officials follow Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the White House, where he said discussions with Trump focused “first and foremost about Iran”.
Netanyahu had previously expressed “general skepticism,” according to a statement issued by his office, stressing that any agreement between the US and Iran must include elements that are critically important to “Israel”, including Iran’s nuclear program, its ballistic missile program, and its ties to regional allies. These issues remain central to ongoing Israeli-Iran tensions, particularly as US officials signal interest in expanding the scope of talks beyond the nuclear file.
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Russia’s ambassador to Venezuela, Sergey Melik-Bagdasarov, denounced the United States’ use of unfair practices to expel Russian and international businesses from Venezuela, as well as acts of piracy to steal its oil. The Russian diplomat said onnTuesday, February 10, that these actions are rooted in economic and financial limitations and extraterritorial sanctions that the US applies in open violation of international law.
Melik-Bagdasarov asserted that the objective of Washington’s actions is to clear the Venezuelan market of “undesirable” foreign companies through unfair competition, making room for corporations that control the US foreign policy. He noted that US officials openly acknowledge this policy in their public statements. The ambassador’s accusation follows the US piracy of the Aquila II tanker in the Indian Ocean and at least seven other vessels since December 2025, actions considered by legal experts as acts of piracy and a naval blockade on Venezuela.
🇷🇺🇻🇪 Comentario del Embajador de Rusia en Venezuela, Sergey Mélik-Bagdasárov, a los medios de comunicación en el acto solemne de la ofrenda floral, dedicado al Día de Diplomático#DíaDelDiplomático #RusiaVenezuela pic.twitter.com/2yK06O7OsZ
— EmbajadaRusaVEN (@EmbajadaRusaVen) February 11, 2026
The Russian diplomat stated that “certain projects are forced to adapt to the pressure of sanctions,” with adjustments to deadlines and work formats after the horrific US military attack against Venezuela on January 3. During the early hours that day, the US carried out a brutal bombing campaign across several states and kidnapped President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, National Assembly Deputy Cilia Flores. The attacks resulted in the deaths of approximately 120 people, including 32 Cuban and 47 Venezuelan soldiers.
Melik-Bagdasarov asserted that despite the US pressure, Russian companies will not renounce their obligations and will maintain their operations in Venezuela. Since the attack, the inability of US imperialism to achieve regime change has forced Washington to negotiate with Chavismo and ease some sanctions through OFAC licenses. However, Venezuela, in turn, has been compelled to negotiate with the US for the release of blocked national funds, the sale of crude oil, and the restoration of diplomatic relations with the US.
Russia in Venezuela after January 3
According to analysts, the positive image of Russia and China following the January 3 attack has been damaged in Venezuela. Despite multiple statements, their lack of decisive support in halting the US aggression proved that their strategy was largely ineffective. Furthermore, during a January 26 interview with the Russia24 channel, Ambassador Melik-Bagdasarov made controversial statements regarding “betrayals” within the Venezuelan military—a move some analysts consider an effort to deflect responsibility for deficiencies in Russian-made Venezuelan air defenses during the US bombing.
“First of all, what do we understand by treason, and when did the treason occur? If by treason we mean criminal negligence, then yes,” the ambassador explained in the interview. “Many of the local security forces did not do what they could have done. If we consider as treason everything that happened long before these events, then of course there was treason. We know all their names, people who fled Venezuela,” he added, which analysts consider a reference to far-right politicians and former high-level Venezuelan officials who had betrayed Chavismo years ago.
While there are valid questions regarding internal betrayals associated with the bombing, many analysts agree that such statements from a foreign diplomat felt unpleasant to many Venezuelans, as they appeared as attempts to absolve Moscow of its own responsibilities. This narrative was reinforced on January 30 by the permanent representative of Russia to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzia, who told Prensa Latina that “some high-ranking officials have, in fact, betrayed President Nicolás Maduro.” Nebenzia added that the US would not be able to “repeat that stunt” in Cuba.
These events have eroded to a certain extent the longstanding positive image that Russia enjoyed among the Chavista majority. While analysts do not believe Venezuela would renege on its commitments to Russia or China, they indicate a growing desire among Venezuelans for these powers to assume—beyond statements—their responsibility as world leaders to halt the disastrous course that the US is pursuing, pushing the world towards a collapse.
Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff
OT/JRE/SC
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
The US military carried out a strike against an alleged drug-trafficking vessel in the eastern Pacific Ocean on Thursday, killing three people, the US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) reported.
Last week the military carried out a strike that killed two people in the Pacific Ocean, conducted under the direction of SOUTHCOM Commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan.
According to SOUTCHOM’s X statement, “On Feb. 13, at the direction of #SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations.”
US Southern Command Resumes Extrajudicial Killings as Piracy Spreads to Indian Ocean
The deaths bring the total number of people killed in strikes on suspected drug boats under Operation Southern Spear to at least 122. No evidence has been provided to prove that these vessels were used for narcotics-related operations.
US authorities reported that no US military personnel were injured.
On Feb. 13, at the direction of #SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known… pic.twitter.com/y50Pbtexfi
— U.S. Southern Command (@Southcom) February 14, 2026
No evidence has been provided to prove that these vessels were used for narcotics-related operations.
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
The Home Office’s decision to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist group last year was unlawful, a three-judge panel at the High Court has ruled.
In a hearing on Friday, Dame Victoria Sharp, one of the judges, said there had been “very significant interference with the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly”.
The court, she said, considered the proscription of the group “disproportionate”.
Despite the ruling, the group will remain proscribed until a further court order because it has “yet to hear argument on whether there should be a stay of any order setting aside the proscription order pending the possibility of appeal,” the judges said.
The judgment is a major blow for former home secretary Yvette Cooper as well as the Israeli arms companies who lobbied for a crackdown on the group.
It will be a relief for over 2,700 protesters who have been arrested for showing support for the group since the controversial ban.
The ruling comes a week after a jury decided not to convict six Palestine Action members accused of some of the most serious criminal charges leveled against the group.
Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action who challenged the proscription order, said on Friday: “This is a monumental victory both for our fundamental freedoms here in Britain and in the struggle for freedom for the Palestinian people, striking down a decision that will forever be remembered as one of the most extreme attacks on free speech in recent British history.”
Ammori won on two of the four grounds that she brought in her challenge. The court found that the proscription decision violated rights enshrined in UK law, namely freedoms of expression, peaceful assembly and association with others.
It also upheld her claims that Cooper’s decision to proscribe the group was not consistent with the Home Office’s own policy.
The government will appeal the decision. Home secretary Shabana Mahmood said the court had acknowledged that Palestine Action had carried out acts of terrorism and that it was “not an ordinary protest or civil disobedience group”.
“For those reasons, I am disappointed by the court’s decision and disagree with the notion that banning this terrorist organisation is disproportionate,” Mahmood said.
The decision to authorise a judicial review had been made in part to expedite the unprecedented number of terrorism-related cases moving through the courts.
**‘A lot of uncertainty’**Around 40 protesters stood outside the court on Friday ahead of the ruling, holding Palestine Action placards, poised for arrest with several Metropolitan Police vans parked nearby.
But police officers at the scene told Declassified that they hadn’t been given orders to make arrests.
In a subsequent statement, the force clarified that it is now focused on gathering evidence of those showing support for the group for potential future enforcement, rather than making arrests.
Roars and celebration erupted outside the court soon after the ruling was read out, but questions remain about exactly what will happen next.
One protester holding a placard told Declassified: “I’m relieved but there is still a lot of uncertainty in my mind about where this is headed.”
The court has directed parties to provide written submissions by 20 February on next steps in light of the judgement.
Filton Acquittals Demolish Starmer and Cooper Lies About Palestine Action 117
**‘Honourable history’**The ban on Palestine Action was announced in June 2025 shortly after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed red paint into the turbines of two military aircraft used for refuelling and transport.
Cooper told parliament that month: “The UK’s defence enterprise is vital to the nation’s national security and this Government will not tolerate those who put that security at risk”.
An order was pushed through parliament in July which added Palestine Action to the list of banned groups under the Terrorism Act 2000.
The Home Office included two Russian neo-Nazi organisations, the Maniac Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, within the same order.
It marked the first time in British history that the government used terrorism legislation to ban a civil disobedience organisation. Only 26 out of 650 MPs voted against the ban.
Raza Husain KC, representing Ammori, told the High Court in November that “civil disobedience on conscientious grounds has a long and honourable history in this country”, arguing that Palestine Action followed in the footsteps of direct action protest groups stretching back centuries.
“It is the mark of a civilised society that protests of this type can be accommodated”, Husain added. “Our client Ms. Ammori has been inspired by a long tradition of direct action in this country from the suffragettes to anti-apartheid activists to Iraq war protesters”.
IranThe Home Office sought to justify the ban on Palestine Action by briefing the press that the group might be funded by Iran.
On 23 June, the day of Cooper’s statement to parliament, the Times published a report saying “Iran could be funding Palestine Action, Home Office officials claimed”.
It added: “Officials are understood to be investigating its source of donations amid concerns that the Iranian regime, via proxies, is funding the group’s activities given that their objectives are aligned”.
Shortly afterwards, the Daily Mail asked: “Does Palestine Action’s cash trail lead all the way to Iran?”, with GB News, the Spectator, and the Telegraph also picking up on the story.
This point was contested by the UK’s independent expert on terrorism, Jonathan Hall KC, who told Channel 4 News earlier this week that those press briefings were “wrong”.
Hall was “not aware” of any evidence behind those claims, he added.
British intelligence reports first exposed by Declassified in July indicated that the ban was in fact largely driven by Palestine Action’s impact on the Israeli arms industry in Britain.
(Declassified UK) by John McEvoy, Dania Akkad and Martin Williams
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
By Larry Holmes – Feb 13, 2026
The general strike in Minneapolis on Jan. 23 that shut the city down and catapulted forward the general strike movement that has been stirring below for some time may turn out to be the biggest step forward that the working class has taken in our lifetime. It is a sign that the virtual frozen iceberg that has slowed the development of the working class for too long is thawing.
After the Minneapolis strike, thousands of people across the country, especially students, joined a call for a national general strike, but that was only a preview of what’s coming.
Groups including labor unions, migrant solidarity forces and antiwar activists are calling for a general strike on May Day 2026. In the recent past, there have been calls for general strikes on May Day, but until now, they’ve been symbolic or not taken seriously. Some activists have been talking about and planning for a general strike for many months. They see Minneapolis as proof that they are on the right track.

Boston, Jan. 30, 2026. Photo: Stevan Kirschbaum/WW.
Some major unions have targeted May Day 2028 for a major labor general strike, when a number of big labor contracts expire. It seems that workers are not willing to wait two years.
The Minneapolis general strike, which was also called an economic blackout, was in response to the violent and murderous occupation of the city by thousands of storm troopers under the direct control of the White House. It is significant that the last general strike in this country — 20 years ago May Day 2006 involving millions of migrant workers across the country called “A day without immigrants” — was also in response to repression against migrant workers.
Police state repression provoked the working-class strike in Minneapolis. But the underlying causes of the strike go beyond state repression and have been long in the making. The deeper context for what happened in Minneapolis is the unprecedented crisis of U.S. imperialism and the capitalist system. It is this crisis that is behind the emergence of Donald Trump and everything that he and the billionaires who back him have been doing or trying to do here and around the world in order to save U.S. imperialism.
The working class is now in the process of rediscovering the weapon of the general strike out of a realization that marches, protests and bourgeois elections are not enough and relying on a bourgeois opposition to Trump to stop the attacks are ineffective. Workers are starting to understand that fighting and smashing the danger of fascism is a class struggle and ultimately a struggle to end the capitalist system.
Accordingly, the working class needs far more powerful weapons in their arsenal, like the general strike. Big Bill Haywood, the leader of the Industrial Workers of the World at the peak of its strength and influence in the working class, predicted that “the general strike is the measure by which the capitalistic system will be overthrown.” The bourgeois opposition to Trump will try to stop the general strike movement, or co-opt it, tame it and extinguish its militancy, its class character and its radical and revolutionary potential. They will try to bring it back under the control of the capitalist ruling class.
However, the growing anger below will not make this easy for them to do, and revolutionary forces should understand this, unite and by doing so, make it that much harder for the ruling class to subordinate the working class to its class interest.
All over the country, there’s been militant mass opposition to the war against migrant workers, people of color and all of those who have risen to their defense. Minneapolis has opened up a new phase of the resistance, but it is just a beginning. Minneapolis has pushed the Trump regime back and widened the cracks in Trump’s ruling-class support. But this new phase has not stopped repression and war. Indeed, the war at home and abroad is going to intensify.
A decaying, dying systemBecause of a dying capitalist system and an imploding and desperate U.S. imperialist empire that is still powerful and dangerous, the world is descending deeper and deeper into a catastrophic crisis under the threat of the U.S. launching more economic and military wars. The next eruption is not coming later; it is in progress right now.
Will an imperialist war be launched against Iran? How far will the imperialists go to try to overthrow the Cuban revolution? Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 and try to cancel the midterm bourgeois elections? At a minimum, he’s already trying to disrupt them. Will the capitalist economic crisis collapse the economy? Will the imperialist war drive spiral into a civilization-threatening global war?
Already, the majority of the working class cannot afford the basic necessities of survival. The magnitude of the economic crisis that is looming will be far bigger than 2008 and push the conditions of the working class beyond the breaking point. The reason for pointing this out is not to spread fear and demoralization. To the contrary, it is to illustrate the necessity of the working-class and revolutionary forces to prepare for a wider and bigger class struggle, including a struggle for power.
The general strike is not new; it has been part of the development of the working class for almost 200 years. In the past, throughout the world, especially where the working class movements were strong, revolutionaries have analyzed and debated every aspect of the general strike and every experience with it. Every question raised by the general strike — from what it is, the conditions for it, what its aims are, how it should be organized and how the working class prepares for it — has been studied.
The rich history of the general strike is important. At this moment, the fundamental goals of a new general strike movement in the U.S. must be viewed in the context of the present situation of the working class, its level of political and class consciousness, organization and experience. This can’t be done by proceeding as if there are no important differences in the situation of the working class in other places and other periods compared to today.
Today in the U.S., from the perspective of a united class struggle against the capitalist class, the working class is only finally awakening. After a long period of being weak organizationally and also tied to the political apparatus of the bourgeoisie, the working class’s priority is acquiring — based on conditions and experience – its identity as a class unto itself and the capacity to act as such transcending all geographical or circumstantial boundaries.
This basic goal is not separate from all other goals, but it is nonetheless a critical goal at this moment, because the ruling class has historically waged an effective war against class consciousness.
Especially now, because of the unprecedented and generalized nature of the crisis, the capitalist class is absolutely dependent on dividing the working class, turning workers against each other, primarily on the basis of white supremacy. The ruling class cannot rule without this weapon. Nothing is more important for the development of the working class right now than overcoming this divide-and-conquer weapon of the enemy class.
The Trump regime and the ruling class want to derail and crush the development of the class struggle by diverting it into a civil war against workers of color based on maintenance of white supremacy.
A class warWe are in a sense back to the basics of class consciousness, class solidarity and united class action 101. This is the only way that the true character of the struggle can be understood and acted upon. This is a struggle between classes. The realization of this in the living struggle is precisely what the ruling class fears more than anything else. A general strike movement has to be more than about a particular strike but rather a deep political and social process of education, learning from experience and moving to the next battle. Minneapolis has opened the door to this realization.
Minneapolis has given us the template for a workers’ general strike that fits present conditions. The strike was not called by or organized by labor unions, although many unions supported it, and union and unorganized workers found creative ways to leave work and participate in the strike. The success of the strike was due to workers and students regardless of union affiliation or circumstances. Most businesses of all sizes were either convinced or pressured to close.
In a way, the Minneapolis general strike succeeded, without knowing it, on the basis of the advice that the great revolutionary Rosa Luxemburg offered to the working-class movement 120 years ago in her pamphlet “The Mass Strike.”
Luxemburg wrote, “The plan of undertaking mass strikes as a serious political class action with organised workers only is absolutely hopeless.” She continued, “If the mass strike, or rather, mass strikes, and the mass struggle are to be successful they must become a real people’s movement, that is, the widest sections of the proletariat must be drawn into the fight.”
It is essential that a political and mass strategy that involves organized and unorganized workers be strengthened to push the leadership of the labor movement into supporting general strikes. Much, much more must be considered, organized and implemented towards this end.
Preparation for general strikeThere is a critical role for young militants, many of whom were drawn into the struggle for almost three years in solidarity with Palestine, to play in the general strike movement. Many of these activists have already been establishing a widening network of community organization with no dependence or control by the capitalist government or its apparatuses.
This grassroots, working-class, community organizing includes defense of migrant workers, anti-police violence, tenant organizing, mutual aid, anti-imperialism and solidarity with revolutionary resistance to the U.S. throughout the Global South. This could be part of a critical mass infrastructure of preparing for a general strike. That preparation would of necessity include mass, popular education upholding the reasons for classwide solidarity and mass action.

Italian dockworkers stop armed shipments to Zionist Israel, Aug. 4, 2025. Photo: Unione Sindacale di Base.
On numerous occasions since Oct. 7, 2023, the Palestinian liberation movement has called for worldwide solidarity general strikes. On Feb. 6 and 7 of this year, dockworkers in a number of countries shut down docks to stop the shipping of weapons to Israel. But this is only the beginning of realizing the potential for more massive, global workers’ strikes against occupation and imperialist war.
Here. at the center of world imperialism, the most politically advanced forces — and our numbers are growing — must view making a general strike movement, or any other expression of the class struggle at home, intrinsically connected to the struggle of workers of the world, and in particular the liberation movements in the Global South. And this needs to be more than symbolic, but rather politically strategic, because it’s more than solidarity; it is the only way our class can prevail worldwide.
There can be no denying, and no tolerance for the denial, that more than ever the class struggle is global. This fact is more than a theoretical principle or a future aspiration. This is a practical and immediate reality. The class struggle everywhere is interconnected, interactive and interdependent. To proceed in our work as though it is otherwise weakens our class and helps the class enemy.
All of these things and more can be accomplished, but only if going forward there is forged a level of unity among like-minded revolutionaries that corresponds to the world crisis and the urgent needs that this has crystallized for the world class struggle.
Larry Holmes is Workers World Party’s First Secretary.
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
By Roger D. Harris and John Perry – Feb 12, 2026
Laura Dogu, newly appointed US envoy to Venezuela, is described by the Los Angeles Times as an appropriate choice because she “navigated crises” in Nicaragua and Honduras during periods of “social and political volatility.” What the LA Times fails to add is that it was precisely Dogu’s job to create crisis and volatility in both countries.
In Latin America she is widely regarded, for good reason, as the “US ambassador of interventions and coups.”
The LA Times appears entirely relaxed about a US diplomat’s job being to meddle in the internal politics of a country whose president the US has just kidnapped in an operation resulting in the murder over 100 people and involving the bombing of key public buildings and health facilities.
Dogu enters the fray “leveraging her experience with authoritarian regimes” and her “deep Latin American expertise.” The LA Times implies that her job is likely to be proactive, looking for ways to ease out the Chavista government and replace it with one more to Washington’s liking, even if that takes a while.
NicaraguaSignaling that this is the case, the LA Times reporter asked right-wing opposition figures from Nicaragua for their opinions of Dogu, presumably on the basis that she is charged with working with similar quislings in her new role. Predictably, they praised her, admitting to having had clandestine meetings with her when she was based in the country and noting her public support for opposition groups.
Dogu was US ambassador in Managua from 2015 until October 2018, a period coinciding with the preparations and then the coup attempt that began in April 2018 and was defeated in July. At the start of her term, she had relatively cordial relations with the government. That changed after President Daniel Ortega was reelected in 2016 with an increased popular mandate. It became clear to Washington that electoral means to oust the Sandinistas lacked sufficient public support.
Instead, as the State Department admitted, the US concentrated their efforts on “civil society” groups led by opposition figures, “limiting their contact” with the elected government. It later emerged that, in the run-up to the April 2018 insurrection, millions of dollars were spent promoting such groups.
When the coup attempt fizzled, President Ortega explicitly identified Laura Dogu, as Washington’s representative, of being “the leader and financier of this conspiracy, the destruction, the fires, the torture, the disrespect for human dignity, the desecration of corpses, and other acts carried out with cruelty against all Nicaraguans marked by the great sin of being Sandinistas.” Within three months, Washington replaced her.
HondurasIn Honduras, Xiomara Castro of the progressive Libre Party became president in January 2022. Laura Dogu arrived in Tegucigalpa as US ambassador just three months later.
The Center for Political and Economic Research (CEPR) catalogued some of her egregious interferences including with energy and tax reforms, creation of a Constitutional Tribunal, replacement of the attorney general, and the building of a prison.
By 2023, Dogu was already drawing criticism from the Honduran foreign minister, who asked her to “stop commenting on internal Honduran matters.” He criticized her again for similar reasons, in December 2024, after she held a series of meetings with NGOs critical of the government.
In August 2024, President Castro complained about Dogu, after the US diplomat criticized Honduran officials for meeting with their counterparts in Caracas. The ambassador characterized this meeting as “sitting next to a drug trafficker.”
Then after a conflict with Dogu over Honduras’s extradition treaty with the US in September 2024 and a spate of rumors about the president’s family, Castro warned that a coup attempt was underway. Dogu concluded her term in Honduras before the presidential elections at the end of 2025, where the US did decisively interfere.
Trump Confirms Future Venezuela Visit as US is Forced to Negotiate With Chavismo
VenezuelaThe LA Times ingenuously commented that Dogu was “an unusual pick signaling a strategic shift in US policy.” It was neither. US policy remains regime change, but the tactics have shifted in response to the successful and unified resistance of the Bolivarian Revolution.
Venezuelan analyst Francisco Rodriguez noted: “Laura Dogu presented credentials as diplomatic representative of the US to the government of [acting President] Delcy Rodríguez today, that would count as an act of formal recognition.”
As for Dogu being “an unusual pick,” her record, as shown above, suggests a continuation of business as usual. CEPR put it bluntly: “Dogu’s appointment suggests that the administration sought someone with experience in aggressively interfering in a host country’s domestic affairs.”
There is nothing unusual about that. Between 1898 and 1994, the US perpetrated coups and government changes in Latin America at least 41 times. Dogu now presides over just another such attempt. The only reasons Washington itself hasn’t suffered a coup, Latin Americans quip, is because there is no US embassy there.
Far from breaking with the past, Dogu actually invokes it: “We never left the Cold War in Latin America,” she said.
Dogu recently tweeted: “Today I met with Delcy Rodríguez and Jorge Rodríguez to reiterate the three phases that @SecRubio has outlined regarding Venezuela: stabilization, economic recovery and reconciliation, and transition.”
The comment drew an immediate repudiation from the aforementioned Jorge Rodríguez, president of Venezuela’s National Assembly. The failure by Dogu to refer to him and acting President Delcy Rodríguez by their formal titles is a disrespectful snub. He characterized her remarks as “diplomatic blackmail” and a “colonial roadmap.” The Venezuelan leadership may have a gun held to their heads, but they continue to respond militantly.
For now, Dogu is concentrating on the “stabilization and economic recovery” phases of the Rubio dictate. The more contentious third phase will be “transition.”
In a telling pivot from its previous myth-making that the “opposition [is] more unified than ever,” the LA Times now admits that Dogu is just the right official to be foisted on Venezuela because of her experience navigating “fragmented opposition movements.” The opposition to the Chavista government has long been fractious despite hundreds of millions of dollars pumped into “democracy promotion” by the US.
Contrary to the myths in the corporate press, María Corina Machado and her hand-picked surrogate Edmundo González Urrutia may not be the people’s choice in Venezuela. No lesser authority than Donald Trump himself commented that Machado “doesn’t have the support within or the respect within the country.”
If the claims that the opposition won the July 2024 presidential by a 70% landslide were credible, why didn’t González present his evidence when summoned by Venezuela’s supreme court? Failing to do so left no constitutional basis for him to be declared the winner.
But that was the whole point of Washington’s interference in backing an astroturf opposition with more traction inside the Beltway than in Caracas. The US objective was not to win the contest but to delegitimize Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The deadly sanctions – illegal unilateral coercive measures – were explicitly designed as collective punishment to erode Maduro’s authority with his compatriots.
And when that failed and the Bolivarian Revolution prevailed, Washington escalated further, culminating in the January 3 kidnapping of a constitutional head of state. That military action formed part of its hybrid war, accompanied by sustained demonization of Maduro before the US public.
ConclusionLaura Dogu’s appointment ultimately signals not innovation but continuity: a recalibration of tactics in pursuit of the same objective that has defined US policy toward the Bolivarian Revolution for decades – regime change through pressure, attrition, and delegitimization. Whether branded as “stabilization,” “economic recovery,” or “transition,” the underlying premise remains that Venezuela’s political future should be shaped in Washington, not Caracas.
Yet the record in Nicaragua, Honduras, and Venezuela itself suggests that external coercion has limits. Dogu’s mission will test not only Venezuela’s resilience but also the durability of the unremitting US strategy of Latin American interventions.
RDH/JP/OT
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
By Jesús Arteaga – Feb 13, 2026
This article, originally published on the portal Cimarrón, was titled “Fulfilling Duty in the Storm.” Its author, journalist Jesús Arteaga, narrates his actions from the moment his sleep was interrupted by the sound of the explosions from the US imperialist bombing of Caracas on January 3, 2026.
I was awakened by the sound of explosions and the buzzing of planes. Immediately, at 1:57 a.m., I received a call from Miranda, my daughter: “Dad, they are bombing us.” She and Gabriela, her mother, knew what to do, which made me calm.
I looked out the window of my house that faces the center of Caracas: the night was clear, and the explosions of the missiles lit up the sky with red flashes. The roar was terrifying.
Miranda and Gabriela live in La Pastora, in a place with a view over much of the Caracas valley. With their binoculars, they were able to see the places the US was attacking. They gave me an excellent report, both acting with composure in difficult moments.
Miranda was in her mother’s womb in April 2002 [during the failed coup against Hugo Chávez]. Gabriela has some experience with such situations; she breathed in quite a bit of gas during our student days.
My brother Juan and I immediately went to Radio Rebelde. My sisters, distressed, stayed at home. Almost in unison, they told us, “Take care of yourselves.”

Jesús Arteaga, journalist and political activist.
We arrived at the radio station very quickly, immediately waking up Camacaro, a member of the Rebelde team who lives on the radio premises, and we started broadcasting at 2:15 a.m.
Juan, the operator, interrupted the music that was playing—I think it was Edgar Alexander—activated the speaker that can be heard in the nearby area, and started playing Alí Primera.
Once “América Latina obrera” started playing, I began: “People of the glorious west of Caracas, at this moment we are being attacked by US imperialism. It is time to honor the legacy of our liberators. Let us show them that we are the sons and daughters of Bolívar. Let us follow the example of Chávez and Guaicaipuro. No one surrenders here!”
I passed the charge to Camacaro, who, along with Juan, executed the plan that we had reviewed thoroughly: first, convey calm and rally the population; second, maintain the radio’s operability for as long as we could. The speeches gave way to the voice of Alí Primera and Commander Chávez. The listeners participated with their reports and questions.
There are threats that, even though they are obvious, many insist on not seeing, as a spell to prevent them from materializing.
At Radio Rebelde, we held several meetings to discuss the threat from the United States and what to do when the aggression would occur. Some producers did not participate because they were of the opinion that nothing would happen here, as if their wish could prevent the attack. Others were punctual and made their contributions, and a few were present when the time came.
I went out on my motorcycle to report on the situation in areas of Catia and to establish some contacts. The streets were deserted, of course, it was 2:00 in the morning.
The Bolivarian National Police (PNB) officers who were in Sucre Square stood firm, without hesitation.
We could hear the voices of some drunks who continued the New Year’s Eve party and seemed unaware of what was happening, sometimes muffled by the flying planes.

Carmelitas corner a little while after the bombing. Photo: Jesús Arteaga.
From the square, I made the first report that spread like wildfire. I sent a message to my comrade Gabriela—not Miranda’s mother, another Gabriela—she replied immediately, informing me that the enemy planes were still in full flight. She, too, was “fulfilling her duty in the storm.”
I continued to apply the protocol, I communicated with Toro, the person in charge of the Sucre parish, and went to the designated place. I immediately verified that the civic-military-police unity is no joke: women and men arrived and obediently followed the instructions.
The place of the gathering was illuminated by a beautiful, bright moon, which provided enough light to recognize some comrades. Among the people present at that place were several officers of the Bolivarian National Armed Force. They were in civilian clothes, but their stature and confident demeanor revealed that they were our soldiers.
“Coffee is ready!” A female voice could be heard saying. Women had prepared that elixir and were distributing it.
From Gramovén, I went out with Toro to tour several key points of Sucre parish. We arrived at Coopercentro, where the people were active, including my buddy Yovani. We also toured other areas of Catia, and the attitude of the organized groups was the same: an absolute willingness to defend the homeland.
We returned to the point of gathering, and people kept arriving.
Alcides, who was in Maracay and whom I woke up at 2:00 a.m. with the news of the bombing, called me to tell me that he had made a connection with a journalist from the New York Times. She had seen my first report made from the Catia square, and he asked if I wanted to speak to her. I said yes, that it was necessary to tell everyone what was happening, to inform the world about the US aggression and the determined attitude of our people. The journalist called me, and I told her the story. I do not know if they published anything.
While I was in Gramovén, my colleague Francisco Trías, a photographer, called me and sent some pictures of the city center. We agreed to meet at the corner of Santa Capilla, where José Valero and Luis Hugas were already. We were the only journalists at the scene. It was still dark, and people were already starting to arrive to support President Nicolás Maduro.
Francisco and I went out to explore Caracas. The rumor of the bombing of the Cuartel de la Montaña made us go up there, where we verified that the 4F monument was still standing and intact. Francisco took some photos, and I wrote another report.
At the roundabout of block 7, the people were ready for defense, and Ramón Padrón was there commanding a large group. We went down to the Coordination Committee, and its members, as always, were ready for battle.
From the 23 de Enero neighbourhood, we headed east, touring the strongholds of the opposition. Altamira Square was deserted. A couple of guys from the Chacao Police were watching us from the south sidewalk of Francisco de Miranda Avenue. We went down to the highway and passed in front of La Carlota, and we did not notice anything unusual. We were not able to see the attacked area.
We decided to go to El Valle. Everything was silent, and there were few people on the street. We noticed that there was no electricity service because the traffic lights were off. In front of the Pedro Emilio Coll high school, Nicolás Maduro’s supporters were beginning to gather.
We arrived at checkpoint number 3 of the Tiuna Fort. There were some people who wanted to return to their apartments; they had left their houses while the bombs were falling.

Checkpoint 3 of Tiuna Fort. Photo: Jesús Arteaga.
An Army officer told them that they could not go back, that they were in danger. However, he let a few in to retrieve documents and something to change into because they had escaped in their nightclothes.
Among those people, there was a very beautiful woman in her 40s, wearing a short, very pretty pajama set. I asked Frank: “Did you take a picture of the girl?” “Nooo Chu, how could you even think of that?” he responded. “Ahh, but you saw her.” “Of course I saw her!”
In contrast was a man of about 70 years, short and fat, he too had sensual clothing: worn-out boxers, a stretched undershirt that had been white in the past, and barefoot.
We returned to Santa Capilla. More people had arrived: there were representatives from the National Assembly, Mayor Carmen Meléndez, and PSUV leaders. That is where I found out, as Desiree Santos Amaral informed me, about the president’s kidnapping by the US.
Venezuela to Iran: The Fate of Our People is Not Determined by Bombs
In Santa Capilla, I did a live report for Radio Rebelde. I interviewed Councilor José Reyes and a National Assembly deputy whose name I forgot.
There was brother Matías, an Argentinian journalist who had made Venezuela his home, and Venezuela had made him its own. We gave each other a tight hug. Mati said to me, “I knew I would find you here, Chu.”
Matías and I decided to keep looking for news. We went to the [opposition] Copei party headquarters to get the opinion of its leaders. That was a bust.
I returned to 23 de Enero, and this time I was able to talk to Juan Contreras, the historical leader of the Simón Bolívar Coordination Committee. I asked him about his son, Freddy Sebastián, a brave kid who fights for his life every day. Then we exchanged information and said goodbye with a strong hug, knowing, without saying it, that we were risking our lives.
From 23 de Enero, Mati and I set off to meet with Toro. Now there were more people in our group. Wilfredo and Yaguaramay arrived there by car. From Gramovén, we left with clear instructions and everything else to exert absolute control over our territory.
Back at the radio station, Vicente and his partner Nena, both with military training in the Militia, were waiting for us, as well as Rondón, Nelson, Reyes, Maikel, and Marcos. Then Franki, Vicente’s brother, two “tenants” of the Citadel, Jhon and Evelio, and Matías joined us. With everyone, we organized the defense of the Citadel, then José Félix joined, who, along with Juan, Camacaro, and Rondón, kept the audience of Rebelde informed.
Several people arrived, including women who asked to be taught how to use weapons to defend their land, their neighborhood, and their children. Nena, who was the instructor, had to conduct several sessions of a rifle handling “workshop.” The will and conviction of our people were manifested with the same firmness as always.
Camacaro had been in charge of the “ranch” for months. We had stored some food, water, and, of course, more coffee—so necessary during the sleepless nights.
We managed to form a larger team than planned, and there was no shortage of timely midnight coffee, messages of support, commitment, and love for this homeland.
On Sunday, January 4, I received another call from Miranda: “Dad, where are you? We are at the march.” “I am on my way, daughter, wait for me, I am heading there now,” I told her. I arrived with my sister, Denis. It was my daughter calling me, and I could not let her down.

People march in Santa Capilla on January 4. Photo: Radio Rebelde.
Thus passed the first days after January 3 for this people who resist, who demand the liberation of their president and first lady, who support comrade Delcy Rodríguez as acting president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Many young people joined, in various ways, in the defense of the homeland. My daughter did it her way. I feel a deep pride in her. Gabriela and I had not worked in vain. Neither had Simón and Hugo.
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/SF
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
By Misión Verdad – Feb 12, 2026
Over decades, the United States has built a system of sanctions that responds to a structural logic. It is a framework designed to mutate, adapt, and endure over time, with the ability to harden or soften without being dismantled.
Its “resilience” lies in the fact that it does not operate as a binary mechanism of “sanction or lifting,” but rather as a legal-administrative framework that combines Congressional laws, national emergency declarations, presidential executive orders, and the technical implementation of the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), allowing Washington to administer economic coercion as a constant characteristic of its foreign policy.
In practice, this system unfolds following a sequential logic that structures and reproduces the sanctions regime over time:
- The pattern of activating the sanctions regime usually begins with the political construction of a “threat” or “national emergency” that enables the legal umbrella under which the specific legal pillars against an “adversary” or “target country” are nurtured.
- From there, the US Congress provides the permanent regulatory framework. Meanwhile, the US president, by virtue of the powers granted in Article II of the US Constitution, issues executive orders that function as arrows against sectors, persons, or strategic flows, particularly financial and energy sectors.
- The OFAC, as the administrative arm of the US Department of the Treasury, operationalizes these guidelines through the issuance of sanctions, designations, blockades, and regulations, consolidating a system that combines political centralization with technical execution.
This design explains why announcements of “lifting sanctions” are often conceptually inaccurate.
In practice, what is observed is the temporary provision of oxygen for the system through licenses, exemptions, or administrative authorizations, without dismantling the underlying legal framework.
The role of the law
The existence of a specific law against a target country fortifies the sanction regime, allowing the US president to reactivate coercion through new orders even if certain executive orders are revoked or suspended, without the need to return to Congress.
The case of Syria illustrates this logic. Although the Caesar Act of 2019 was repealed by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, the NDAA itself incorporated a conditional oversight mechanism that allows for the reimposition of sanctions via executive order if the US government certifies Syria’s non-compliance with political criteria defined by Washington.
The repeal, in this sense, reconfigures the system in a reversible manner. It does not dismantle it.
Venezuela fits perfectly into this structural pattern.
Since 2014, there has been a legal basis. The 2014 Law on the Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society in Venezuela enables the issuance of executive orders and subsequent OFAC action, resulting in the sanctioning architecture that sequentially impacted the Venezuelan oil industry, starting with crude oil exports as the most sensitive link in the value chain.
In this context, the granting of licenses is equivalent to Venezuela’s insertion into the licensing administration phase of the coercive regime itself. It is a change of level within the same system because the system is dynamic in convenience, not static, nor immutable.
The General License 41 granted to Chevron in November 2022 marked a turning point by authorizing the export of Venezuelan crude oil to the United States under a controlled, monthly renewable scheme.
This precedent inaugurated a logic of selective flexibilization that translated into energy security calculations and reordering of supply in a context of global disruptions.
The European energy crisis, sanctions against Russia, signs of depletion in the US shale boom, and the reduction of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve created an environment in which reinserting Venezuelan oil into the global market became functional to Washington’s immediate interests.
OFAC Licenses Select Oil Companies to Resume Venezuelan Operations Following Failed US Regime Change
The current situation
In this context, the recent “combo” of licenses issued by OFAC at the end of January 2026 came about.
General License 46 significantly expands the authorized operations in the value chain of the Venezuelan oil sector, from export, refining, marketing, and logistics to re-export and resale. However, it maintains strategic exclusions in activities.
General License 47 authorizes the supply of US-origin diluents, a critical input to facilitate the production and transportation of heavy crude oil. This also establishes contractual conditions under US jurisdiction that reinforce the legal asymmetry of the scheme.
In addition, there are General Licenses 48, 46A, and an update to 30B in port and airport matters. These changes form an ecosystem of fragmented authorizations that allows Washington to modulate the sector’s operability based on the evolution of negotiations and political alignment.
This network of licenses also sends signals of legal certainty to foreign companies interested in reentering the Venezuelan energy market. The implicit guarantee is administrative predictability within a coercive regime.
In this regard, licenses function as negotiation tools, and comparative experience confirms that this scheme is inherently reversible.
The administration of licenses represents sophistication as a “carrot and stick” tool. Coercion is administered in calibrated doses to maximize its geopolitical profitability.
In an international ecosystem marked by the new US National Security Strategy, the renewed Trump Corollary, and even the Monroe Doctrine, there are no indications that Washington is willing to dismantle an instrument that allows it to condition, pressure, and negotiate from its position of structural power.
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/SF
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
The Guatemalan government announced the termination of the medical collaboration agreement with Cuba under which Cuban health professionals worked in remote and impoverished areas of the country since 1998.
On Tuesday, February 10, the Guatemalan Ministry of Health announced that the 412 Cuban medical collaborators currently working in the country, of whom 333 are specialist doctors, will be replaced “gradually” by “national human resources.”
The decision, justified by a “technical analysis” to “strengthen the national healthcare system,” comes amid US pressures on Cuba and the rise of right-wing governments in Latin America that are aligned with this policy.
US persecution against a symbol of solidarity
Cuba’s international medical collaboration, with over six decades of history and a presence in 56 countries, follows the principles of solidarity and South-South cooperation.
However, this mission has been a specific target of a US campaign to suffocate and discredit it, which has intensified since Donald Trump’s first administration.
The US narrative, which accuses these programs of “modern slavery” and “human trafficking,” is aimed at undermining one of the main sources of foreign exchange for Cuba, as well as depriving vulnerable populations of medical care.
The Cuban international medical mission began in 1960 with the dispatch of a first brigade to Chile, devastated by an earthquake. It was forged in the following decades as a pillar of Cuba’s foreign policy.
International Activists Announce Flotilla Mission for Cuba Solidarity
The mission was later strengthened by large programs, such as the Barrio Adentro Mission in Venezuela or the Mais Médicos program in Brazil. It gained recognition by responding to global health crises, from the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone to sending doctors to the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.
The continued US economic and political aggression against Cuba has entered a new and brutal phase of energy asphyxiation, with the recent executive order threatening sanctions on third countries for supplying fuel to Cuba. This escalation is a brutal act of aggression aimed at provoking hunger and despair among the population, as openly declared by the Trump administration. However, Cuba, its political leadership guided by the ideals of Fidel Castro, the revolutionary continuity with President Miguel Díaz-Canel, and its people, has had the resilience to defend the nation’s right to self-determination and sovereignty.
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/SF
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
The US military kills three more people in a fresh attack targeting a boat in the Caribbean Sea.
From Presstv via This RSS Feed.
The United Nations has sounded the alarm over the energy crisis in Cuba after it was cut off by the Trump administration from fuel supplied by Venezuela.
From Presstv via This RSS Feed.
Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—On Friday, Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez visited the José Antonio Anzoátegui Complex with US Secretary of Energy Christopher Wright. The visit is part of an intensive bilateral agenda aimed at strengthening oil relations and consolidating cooperation between the two nations. Simultaneously, US President Donald Trump informed the press about an upcoming visit to Venezuela.
In a message shared on social media on Friday, Rodríguez commented on her Thursday tour of Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) and Chevron oil operational areas in Monagas state, where the officials inspected crude oil production facilities. She emphasized that joint work benefits both countries and their peoples.
View this post on Instagram
“We are working on a very quick agenda to consolidate bilateral cooperation. This is what matters so much to both the United States and Venezuela,” Rodríguez said. “We want our countries, our people, and their regions to benefit.” She reaffirmed that the century-long energy relationship is currently progressing within a framework of respect for national industry with a view toward a prosperous future.
Wright departs after diplomatic tour
Before departing Venezuela on Friday night, Secretary Wright told the press that his relationship with Acting President Rodríguez had strengthened during the two-day tour. In an interview with NBC journalist Kristen Welker, Wright stated that he would return to Venezuela, as would other cabinet secretaries, and did not rule out a potential visit to Venezuela by US President Donald Trump.
For her part, Rodríguez is evaluating a potential visit to the White House following her initial meeting with Wright at Miraflores Palace on Wednesday. However, this possibility is questioned by analysts and Chavistas, who point to the characterization of the US as a rogue state capable of kidnapping her once she sets foot in the country.
Trump confirms plans to visit Venezuela
Also on Friday, Trump confirmed that he plans to visit Venezuela, though a date has not been finalized. He stated this before boarding Air Force One at Fort Bragg, the military base where US troops trained before the January 3 bombing of Venezuela, which killed over 120 people, including 32 Cuban soldiers, and resulted in the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.
“I am going to visit Venezuela … We haven’t finalized the details yet, but we will,” Trump said when questioned by reporters. Regarding his relationship with Acting President Rodríguez, Trump stated, “We have a good relationship with the president of Venezuela. We are working very closely together.”
Analysts claim the US has been forced to deal with Chavismo and Delcy Rodríguez due to its incapacity to produce regime change despite the brutal military aggression in early January. Rodríguez was sworn in as acting president on January 5, 2026, by the National Assembly following the kidnapping of President Maduro. Her appointment, supported by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), maintains the constitutional order and does not trigger early elections, as the forced absence of President Maduro was an external criminal act not contemplated by the national constitution.
Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff
OT/JRE/SF
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—On Friday, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General Licenses 49 and 50, easing sanctions against Venezuela in a move that many analysts see as evidence of the failure of Washington’s regime change attempt. This shift comes as Chavismo remains in full control of the country despite the recent high-intensity imperialist aggression.
License 50 authorizes transactions related to oil and gas sector operations. This imperial measure specifies that international oil corporations Repsol, Shell, Eni, Chevron, and BP PLC can resume operations in Venezuela. This license substantially eases the illegal US sanctions enforced since 2019, during Donald Trump’s first term. Under the new guidelines, these companies may enter into contracts and make monetary payments into the “Foreign Government Deposit Funds,” as specified in Order 14373 of January 9, 2026, or other accounts as directed by the US Department of the Treasury.
Meanwhile, License 49 authorizes the negotiation and signing of contingent contracts for certain investments. However, the licenses stipulate that any transaction involving persons or entities from Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, or China—including joint ventures with such parties—is excluded.
Analysts warn that the specific language of OFAC licenses should not be confused with Venezuela’s sovereign actions to remain independent. They state that the references to excluded nations should be viewed with caution, noting the disparity between what the US writes in its licenses and the reality on the ground as Venezuela pursues multiple international partners in the oil business.
This easing of illegal sanctions occurs amid a context of extreme political complexity following the January 3 US military attack. During the attack, US forces bombed Venezuela, killing 120 people, including 32 Cuban soldiers, before kidnapping President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.
India’s Reliance
Also on Friday, Bloomberg reported that OFAC issued a private license to India’s Reliance Industries. This authorization allows the conglomerate to purchase Venezuelan oil directly despite the sanctions that remain in effect. The move is expected to accelerate Venezuela’s oil exports and reduce crude costs for Reliance, which operates the world’s largest refining complex.
The private license authorizes the purchase, export, sale, and refining of extracted Venezuelan oil. Earlier this month, Reliance purchased 2 million barrels of Venezuelan crude from the trader Vitol, which, along with Trafigura, was previously granted US licenses to trade part of Venezuela’s oil output.
US Imperialism Forced to Negotiate With Chavismo as US Energy Secretary Visits Orinoco Oil Belt
The shift follows a recent decision by the US president to remove a punitive 25% tariff on India, contingent on New Delhi increasing oil purchases from the US and potentially Venezuela to offset Russian imports. Reliance, a long-time buyer of Venezuelan crude, had suspended purchases in early 2025 due to the tightening of illegal US sanctions. The company operates two refineries in India with a combined capacity of approximately 1.4 million barrels per day.
The report, cited by a “person familiar with the matter” who requested anonymity, was not officially confirmed by Reliance as the company did not respond to Bloomberg’s message seeking comment.
Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff
OT/JRE/SF
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
The acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, highlighted the resilience and spirit of international cooperation of the Venezuelans, and announced that the state will allocate resources for 400 youth-led projects nationwide. She made these announcements at a massive mobilization in Plaza Venezuela of Caracas on Thursday, February 12, the Day of Venezuelan Youth and the 212th anniversary of the Battle of La Victoria.
“We have selected 400 projects in chicken farming, rabbit farming, sewing workshops, sublimation, and other ventures,” she announced. “May these first jobs for youth serve their growth.”
She also spoke about the visit by the US Secretary of Energy Christopher Wright, noting that the US agenda with Venezuela must be based on respect and cooperation, within the framework of international laws and those of Venezuela.
The acting president highlighted the achievements of the youth of the state oil corporation Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), stating that Venezuela has been built with their effort and bravery. “Despite the criminal blockade, they have not given up,” she said.
She further highlighted Venezuela’s achievement of exporting natural gas for the first time in history, a milestone that has demonstrated “our capacity for resilience and our spirit of international cooperation.”
“I am very pleased that the diverse youth, the plural youth, can express themselves in Venezuela,” she said in her message to the people who had mobilized for the day.
She called on all sectors, and especially the working-class youth, to join the Peace and Democratic Coexistence Program and to continue safeguarding the peace of the nation.
There Will Be No Presidential Elections in Venezuela Until 2031
Diosdado Cabello highlights youth contribution in the Bolivarian project
Addressing the mobilization, the minister of the Interior, Justice, and Peace, Diosdado Cabello, emphasized that “it is the youth who will carry the flags of the homeland to their ultimate victory.”
Honoring the historical and contemporary role of Venezuelan youth in the Bolivarian Revolution, he emphasized the contrast between the current government and the “Fourth Republic,” during which thousands of young people were killed and persecuted and 11,300 people were disappeared by the two-party system of the time. “There are those who want us to forget, but our youth is very clear that we cannot forget.”
In contrast, Cabello highlighted that thanks to the Bolivarian Revolution, more than 100 universities have been opened in Venezuela for young people to study, including UNEFA, the Bolivarian University of Venezuela, and the University of the Arts, to ensure rights previously denied to the population.
He asserted that true free and quality education only began with the arrival of the Bolivarian Revolution. He criticized the 1961 Constitution, labeling its promises of free education as “nonsense.”
The minister also spoke about the Amnesty Law that is currently undergoing a national consultation and the second discussion at the National Assembly. He took a firm stance against tweaks proposed by far-right politicians to the law, arguing that that such a law cannot be used to liberate those involved in corruption, drug trafficking, or murder.
“The Amnesty Law has conditions, limits, and principles,” Cabello stated. He further defended the Law Against Hatred and similar existing legal mechanisms that the right wants to get rid of.
Call for the return of President Maduro
A central theme of Diosdado Cabello’s speech was the demand for the return of Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores, kidnapped by US imperialism despite being “innocent of anything they are accused of.” He led the attendees in a solemn oath, swearing by their honor and life to continue fighting for national sovereignty and the return of the “brother president.”
“This is the real Venezuela that the world wants to deny,” Cabello concluded, “the one that fights, works, and does not surrender after 26 years of defeating US imperialism.”
(Telesur) with Orinoco Tribune content
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/SH
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
On Thursday afternoon, the second discussion of the Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence was deferred as no unanimous agreement was reached regarding article 7. However, the parliamentarians approved the drafting of the law up to article 6, and some of the articles approved underwent modifications.
The president of the National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, announced on Thursday, February 12, that the discussion on the regulation has been postponed until next week.
When the parliamentarians had reached Article 7, the debate came to a standstill. Only the title of that article was unanimously modified from “Excluded Offenses” to “Personal Scope.”
The proposed amendment to Article 7 read: “The Amnesty subject to this Law covers any person who is or may be prosecuted or convicted for their alleged or proven participation in crimes or offenses committed within the framework of the events subject to Amnesty, provided they are in compliance with the law or come into compliance after the entry into force of this Law.”
After the article was read, opposition deputy Luis Florido intervened, suggesting that the text be drafted up to “the acts subject to this amnesty.” He did not agree with adding the requirement to come into compliance with the law, because according to him, by complying with the law, the person is somehow being labeled as guilty.
Immediately, the deputy from the Patriotic Bloc, Iris Varela, intervened and responded to Florido. She considered it regrettable that, “despite the spirit of coexistence offered by this law, there are voices that insist on ignoring that, in Venezuela, for years there have been attacks against the Venezuelan state, the laws, the constitution, and the life of the people.”
She pointed out that if there is one thing that Venezuelans agree on, it is that President Nicolás Maduro has been able to maintain the peace of the country. “We live in peace, we have peace in the country because in 2017 President Nicolás Maduro called for a National Constituent Assembly for peace.” She added that there have been repeated attempts by the opposition over various periods to undermine this peace.
Varela reviewed the violent events promoted by right-wing sectors since 2002.
She referred to the coup d’état of April 2002 against President Hugo Chávez, the oil sabotage of 2002-2003, Henrique Capriles’ call to “let out the anger” after losing the 2013 presidential elections, “the terrible five-year term of the 2015-2020 National Assembly,” which illegally keeps on extending its term to “collect money stolen from the public treasury.”
She added that there are some deputies who do not even want those people to acknowledge the crimes that they have committed.
“It was the United States that dropped the bombs on the country. It bombed us, it keeps us blockaded, but who asked for that? Who endorsed it?” Varela asked, referring to the sectors of the Venezuelan right that have promoted such actions against the nation, against the people.
“Who is responsible for the deaths that have occurred in the country?,” she continued. “Who are the victims? Are they the ones who are detained or the ones who died? Because when victims are mentioned, it is deliberately ignored that in 2002, when the right staged the coup against Chávez, it hired mercenaries from El Salvador, those who brought them are in hiding and have fled the country, and those snipers killed 49 people and injured 890 people.”
She also referred to the guarimbas promoted by the far right in 2017 where Orlando Figuera was burned alive in Altamira.
“It is a grotesque manipulation that the right-wingers portray them as victims of the Venezuelan State. They are not victims of the Venezuelan state! They are victims of violence, carried out by those who today seek an amnesty and do not even have the humility to acknowledge that the State, despite the attack, is granting them forgiveness for the crimes they committed, for the sake of the peace of the country, which is a higher good,” she pointed out.
Varela concluded that Article 7 clearly states that the amnesty “covers individuals who are being prosecuted or convicted for the crimes committed as long as they come forward to the authorities.”
She emphasized that someone who is unaware or has not committed any crime cannot be granted amnesty. “Whoever has not committed any crime has no reason to ask for amnesty, it is that simple. Whoever wants to be amnestied has to ask for it, has to comply with the law, and that is the crux of this law that has sparked a debate.”
She added that it is proposed to keep the article as it has been read.
In the draft that was debated and approved in the first discussion on February 5, Article 7 stated: “Persons prosecuted or convicted for the alleged or proven commission of the following crimes will be excluded from the application of the amnesty provided for in this Law:
- Crimes against public property.
- Serious violations of human rights, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, in accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
- Intentional homicide.
- Trafficking of narcotics and psychotropic substances, with a minimum applicable sentence of more than 9 years in prison.
The law was announced by Acting President Delcy Rodríguez on January 30.
Consensus reached until Article 6
The title of the law remained the same: Law of Amnesty for Democratic Coexistence, as well as the title of Article 1: Purpose.
Article 1, for its part, was amended as follows: This law aims to grant a general and full amnesty for the crimes or offenses committed and occurred within the framework of the events and the time period indicated in this Law in order to promote social peace and democratic coexistence.
The heading of Article 2 changed from: “This law has the purpose of,” to simply: “Purposes.”
Article 2 reads as follows: This law aims to:
1: Contribute to the promotion of peace, democratic coexistence, rectification, and national reconciliation. (The word rectification was added)
-
Generate the conditions that favor the harmonious development of national life, public tranquility, democratic participation, and political pluralism. (It remained the same)
-
Promote the use of democratic and constitutional mechanisms to resolve the differences that arise within society and thus prevent the events subject to amnesty or similar from recurring. (The word “similar” was added to it).
A fourth point was also added, which states: Promote the reintegration into public activity of the individuals benefited by this law.
Regarding Article 3, the heading remained the same: Principles. However, the content of the article became as follows: This law is governed by the principles and values of life, liberty, justice, celerity, equality, solidarity, democracy, social responsibility, and in general, the preeminence of human rights, ethics, and political pluralism.
In addition to the fact that the word “celerity” was included, Deputy Nicolás Maduro Guerra proposed incorporating peace as a fundamental principle and value. The suggestion was unanimously approved.
The heading and Article 4 remained the same, that is, Public Order and general interest. Article 4. The provisions of this law are of public order and general interest.
Article 5 was amended as follows: In case of doubts in the interpretation or application of this law, the one that most favors the respect, protection, and guarantee of human rights shall be adopted, in accordance with the provisions of Article 24 of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Heading of Article 6 changed from “General Amnesty” to “Temporary Scope.”
Article 6 was also amended as follows: The Amnesty provided for in Article 1 encompasses all actions or omissions that constitute crimes or offenses committed and occurred between January 1, 1999, and the entry into force of this Law, within the framework of the amnestied events.
2700 contributions to the law
Given the importance of the law, the president of the National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, granted a license to the president of the Special Commission for the Public Consultation of the Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence, Jorge Arreaza, and to the vice president of the special body, Nora Bracho, to say a few words regarding the debates that took place about the regulation.
In the second discussion, according to the Internal and Debate Regulations of the National Assembly, what is stipulated is the discussion article by article, which is what proceeded thereafter.
In this regard, Arreaza presented a report on the Public Consultation that began on February 7. He reported that they had received 2,700 written contributions to strengthen the law. He noted that proposals continue to arrive. He explained that assemblies were held in 24 states of the country and in the Capital District of Caracas.
He further announced that the magistrate and president of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, Tania D’Amelio Cardiet, informed him that the justices of the peace were motivated to debate the law and held 2,262 assemblies in communes, sessions in which more than 25,000 people participated.
He emphasized that the debates took place in the conciliatory spirit shown by Hugo Chávez Frías on April 14, 2002, when he was rescued by the people from the clutches of the coup plotters that year.
Reconciliation does not mean erasing history
Thereafter, the opposition deputy from Un Nuevo Tiempo party, Nora Bracho, took the floor, highlighting that the deputies have put their heart into the consultation of the law.
“Reconciliation does not mean erasing history, it is dignifying it,” she said. “It is not closing our eyes, it is looking at each other eye to eye as a society. It is not surrendering to the conflict, it is overcoming it. Today we send a clear message, Venezuela can correct, Venezuela can build agreements that transcend our differences.”
She pointed out that this law must be broad in scope, it must include everyone. In this regard, she mentioned the people whom the Venezuelan right calls “political prisoners” and the so-called “persecuted” and “exiled,” who for “political reasons are today outside our space and our vision.” However, in reality, they are politicians who were detained for promoting destabilizing actions in the country, or those who have fled the country after having promoted coups and foreign invasions.
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/SH
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.





