Latin American Publications!

122 readers
29 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
401
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Violence declines in Jalisco thanks to security strategy

The Mexican government reported on progress in the National Security Strategy in Jalisco, with actions that have made it possible to locate and dismantle organized crime operations, make arrests, and seize assets. As a result, extortion fell by 26.8%.

Governor Pablo Lemus emphasized that, in coordination with the Mexican government, the daily average number of intentional homicides decreased by 47% in the last year. In addition, high-impact crimes declined by 25% between October 2024 and January 2026, which was the month with the lowest crime rate in the last 16 months.

Addressing the causes of crime and prevention for young people

The strategy also prioritizes attention to the causes of violence, with community actions in 15 municipalities that have generated 278 Peace Campaign Days, with the participation of more than 110,000 residents. In addition, controls at bus stations were reinforced to prevent the recruitment of young people by criminal groups, as part of preventive actions aimed at youth.

Plan Kukulcán: Mexico prepares for the 2026 World Cup

Plan Kukulcán, a coordinated security strategy to ensure safety at the 2026 World Cup, was presented. More than 99,000 personnel will participate, with anti-drone systems, aerial surveillance, and coordination with the United States, Canada, and FIFA.

Broad public support for electoral reform

President Claudia Sheinbaum highlighted the results of an Enkoll poll showing public support for the proposed Electoral Reform. Results indicate that 85% of those surveyed support reducing the income of electoral body board members and 82% back cutting public financing for political parties. Sheinbaum noted that the proposal responds to the public’s demand for austerity and greater democracy.

Coordination with the United States and review of the USMCA

Sheinbaum affirmed that the relationship with the United States remains one of cooperation and respect for sovereignty, with intelligence sharing but each country remaining within its own territory.

The President also noted that the review of the USMCA is progressing favorably, with the support of U.S. companies due to the economic benefits of the trade agreement, and reiterated that coordination on immigration and economic issues will continue.


The post People’s Mañanera March 6 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

402
 
 

This article by Cristóbal Martínez Riojas originally appeared in the March 6, 2026 edition of El Economista.

Using overtime as a permanent solution to address the gradual reduction of the working day to 40 hours in companies could be a more costly measure and a setback to the objective of the legal change, warn labour law specialists.

“Technically it is not illegal as such, but it will generate a legal and economic consequence for companies,” warns Estefanía Rueda, partner at Littler.

The constitutional reform enacted this week, in addition to the 40-hour work week, establishes a new limit on overtime; double-paid hours will be limited to 12 per week, cannot exceed four hours per day, and cannot occur more than four times in a week.

While in the case of so-called “triple hours” the restriction will be 4 hours per week, before the reform there was no maximum for this model.

The increase in permitted overtime hours may be seen by companies as a permanent remedy to compensate for the reduction to a 40-hour workweek; that is, asking workers to work overtime.

“I would be concerned if some companies were viewing overtime as a permanent option. I would constantly point out and warn that overtime is just that, extraordinary, and should not be treated as ordinary on a regular basis,” said Mayeli Cabral, partner in the Labor Law department at Chevez Ruíz Zamarripa.

Estefanía Rueda agrees that, faced with the reduction of the working day, the solution for some employers is to increase the use of overtime.

“Especially because these are still within the limits allowed by law without constituting the crime of labour exploitation. So, in this sense, they represent a lower risk for employers to be able to ask employees to work that extra shift of up to 12 hours a week,” Rueda explains.

Using overtime to compensate for reduced working hours instead of taking other measures in processes and hiring more staff could go against the objective of the reform, which is to give workers more time for rest .

More Overtime Hours Limit Rest

Mayeli Cabral believes that companies should not lose sight of the fact that the foundation of this reform is to achieve more rest time for workers and that “this measure should not be abused. That time should be respected.”

Rueda argues that increasing the limit on allowed overtime hours, from 9 to 12 per week, contradicts the reduction of psychosocial risks from work in Standard 035.

This, he explains, is because increasing overtime hours creates a psychosocial risk due to a greater workload and a potentially lower balance between personal life and work.

“In their analyses, companies that are subject to this regulation (Standard 035) will identify a high risk and will have to establish corrective or control measures so that this level of risk can be reduced in the next evaluation,” Rueda adds.

As for the economic consequences, if companies use overtime to compensate for the reduction in working hours, they will also have to assume double payment for those hours.

“Since they are (used as) an everyday matter, it can also generate an increase in the base salary for social security contributions and allow employees to request that this overtime payment be included within their integrated salary,” Rueda warns.

Both specialists agree that companies need to start preparing now and not wait until January 1, 2027, the date on which the gradual reduction of the working day begins, to prepare scenarios that do not significantly impact costs or the “abuse” of overtime.

“I am in favor of not abusing overtime hours , but rather that the objective of the reform, which is rest time and more quality time, is truly fulfilled,” says Mayeli Cabral.

Among the preparation actions, the lawyer suggests starting by reviewing internal work processes to identify repetitive tasks, those that do not add value, and thereby investing in training and the use of technology.

“The best thing to do is to use this time to review which activities we can perhaps automate, making processes more efficient, even if they are still carried out by humans, but which can help us streamline our processes within companies to ensure that this reduction in working hours is real,” Rueda suggests.

The post Experts Warn About Excessive Overtime with Reduced Working Hours appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

403
 
 

By Medea Benjamin – Mar 4, 2026

On our recent delegation to Venezuela, one quote echoed again and again — a warning written nearly two centuries ago by Simón Bolívar in 1829:

“The United States appears destined by Providence to plague America with misery in the name of liberty.”

For many Venezuelans, that line no longer feels like history. It feels like the present.

The January 3 U.S. military operation that seized President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores marked a dramatic escalation in a conflict that Venezuelans describe not as sudden but as cumulative — the culmination of decades of pressure, sanctions, and attempts at isolation. “We still haven’t totally processed what happened on January 3,” sanctions expert William Castillo told us. “But it was the culmination of over 25 years of aggression and 11 years of resisting devastating sanctions. A 20-year-old today has lived half his life in a blockaded country.”

Carlos Ron, former deputy foreign minister and now with the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research, described the buildup to the invasion as the result of a carefully constructed narrative. “First there was the dangerous rhetoric describing Venezuelans in the United States as criminals,” he said. “Then endless references to the Tren de Aragua gang. Then the boat strikes blowing up alleged smugglers. Then the oil tanker seizures and naval blockade. The pressure wasn’t working, so they escalated to the January 3 invasion and kidnapping of President Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, and the deaths of over 100 people.”

While in the United States the events of January 3 have largely been forgotten, replaced by a devastating war with Iran, in Venezuela the reminders are everywhere. Huge banners draped from apartment buildings demand: “Bring them home.” Weekly protests call for their release.

In the Tiuna neighborhood of Caracas, we met Mileidy Chirinos, who lives in an apartment complex overlooking the site where Maduro was captured. From her rooftop, she told us about that dreadful night, when the sky lit up with explosions so loud her building shook and everyone ran outside screaming.

“Have your children ever woken up terrified to the sound of bombs?” she asked.

We shook our heads.

“Ours have,” she said. “And they are U.S. bombs. Now we understand what Palestinians in Gaza feel every day.”

She told us psychologists now visit weekly to help residents cope with the trauma.

Within days of the U.S. invasion, the National Assembly swore in Vice President Delcy Rodríguez as acting president. President Trump publicly praised Rodríguez for “doing a good job,” emphasizing his strong relationship with her. But from the beginning, she has been negotiating with the United States with a gun to her head. She was told that any refusal to compromise would result not in the kidnapping of her and her team, but death and the continued bombing of Venezuela.

The presence of U.S. power looms large. Nuclear submarines still patrol offshore. Thousands of troops remain positioned nearby. Every statement and decision made by the government is scrutinized. And on February 2, despite Trump’s praise for Delcy Rodríguez, he renewed the 2015 executive order declaring Venezuela an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security.

The visits from the heads of the CIA and Southern Command have undoubtedly been difficult for the government to swallow. Delcy’s revolutionary father was tortured to death in 1976 by a Venezuelan government that worked closely with the CIA. The U.S. Southern Command coordinated the January 3 attack.

But the government is not without leverage.

“The United States thought the state was weak, that it didn’t have popular support, that the military was divided,” said Tania Díaz of the ruling PSUV party. “January 3rd could have triggered looting, military defections, or widespread destabilization. None of that happened.”

The United States has overwhelming military dominance, but it was also aware that millions of Venezuelans signed up to be part of the people’s militia. This militia, along with the army that remained loyal to the government, gave Washington pause about launching a prolonged war and attempting to replace Delcy Rodríguez with opposition leader María Corina Machado.

While Machado enjoys enthusiastic support among Venezuelan exiles in Miami and the Trump administration recognized her movement as the winner of the 2024 election, the picture inside Venezuela is very different.  The opposition remains deeply divided and Trump realized there was no viable faction ready to assume power.

Besides, as William Castillo put it bluntly: “Trump does not care about elections or human rights or political prisoners. He cares about three other things: oil, oil, and oil.”

Certainly, under the circumstances, the Venezuelan leadership has had little choice but to grant the United States significant influence over its oil exports. But while Trump boasts that this is the fruit of his “spectacular assault,” Maduro had long been open to cooperation with U.S. oil companies.

“Maduro was well aware that Venezuela needed investment in its oil facilities,” Castillo told us, “but the lack of investment is because of U.S. sanctions, not because of Maduro. Venezuela never stopped selling to the U.S.; it is the U.S. that stopped buying. And it also stopped selling spare parts needed to repair the infrastructure. So the U.S. started the fire that decimated our oil industry and now acts as if it’s the firefighter coming to the rescue.”

Venezuela Reports 8.7% Economy Growth in 2025 Despite US Aggression; Inflation Persists

In any case, the easing of oil sanctions — the only sanctions that have been partially lifted — is already bringing an infusion of much-needed dollars, and the government has been able to use these funds to support social programs.

But in Venezuela the conflict is not seen as simply about oil. Blanca Eekhout, head of the Simon Bolivar Institute, says U.S. actions represent a brazen return to the 1823 Monroe Doctrine. The doctrine originally warned European powers not to interfere in the Western Hemisphere, but over time it became a justification for repeated U.S. interventions across the region.

“We have gone back 200 years,” she said. “All rules of sovereignty have been violated. But while the Trump administration thinks it can control the hemisphere by force, it can’t.”

The historical contradiction is stark. In 1823, the young United States declared Latin America its sphere of influence. A year earlier, Bolívar envisioned a powerful, sovereign Latin America capable of charting its own destiny. That tension still echoes through the present.

Bolívar’s dream is also being battered by the resurgence of the right across the region. The left in Latin America is far weaker than during the days of Hugo Chávez. Bolivia’s Evo Morales and Ecuador’s Rafael Correa have been replaced by conservative leaders. Cuba remains under a suffocating U.S. siege. Progressive regional institutions like CELAC and ALBA have faded, and the vision of Latin American unity that once seemed within reach now feels far more fragile.

In Caracas, the situation is tangled, contradictory, and volatile. But amid the uncertainty, one thing felt clear: the Venezuelan left is not collapsing. It is recalibrating.

As Blanca told us before we left:

“They thought we would fall apart. But we are still here.”

And in the background, Bolívar’s warning continues to drift through the air — like a storm that never quite passes.

(CODEPINK)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

404
 
 

On Sunday, March 8, Colombians will go to the polls to elect members of the Senate and the House of Representatives for the 2026-2030 term. These are the first elections of this year’s electoral calendar, which will culminate with the election of President Gustavo Petro’s successor in May, or in June if there is a second round.

On March 8, more than 41 million Colombians in the electoral roll will also be able to participate in the inter-party consultations, which will define the presidential candidates of various parties or coalitions for the presidential elections of May.

These legislative elections will be crucial for the governance of the next president, who will take office on August 7, 2026. The Colombian Congress is composed of two chambers: the Senate (with 102 seats elected by popular vote plus an additional seat given to the second most voted presidential candidate) and the House of Representatives (183 seats).

The parliament not only legislates but also exercises essential political control over the government, approves or rejects structural reforms, and distributes public resources through the national budget.

Voters will elect the parliamentarians through a proportional system (D’Hondt method), with the option of open lists—where the voter marks a specific candidate and the order of the list is defined by individual preference, or closed lists—where the vote is for the party and the order is established by the party or the coalition.

Senate and House of Representatives elections
In the Senate, 102 members will be elected by popular vote: 100 in the national constituency (the entire country votes for the same list) and two in the special indigenous constituency. An extra seat is added for the presidential candidate who comes in second place in the first or second round, according to the Opposition Statute.

In the House of Representatives, there will be elections for 183 seats, with a more diverse and regional distribution: 161 by territorial constituencies (each department and Bogotá elect a number proportional to their population) and 16 Special Transitional Peace Constituencies (CITREP), reserved for victims of the armed conflict.

Moreover, there will be special seats for Afro-descendant communities, indigenous peoples, communities of the San Andrés and Providencia archipelago, Colombians residing abroad, and for the Opposition Statute for the vice-presidential candidate in second place.

Both in the Senate and the House of Representatives, the temporary seats for the Comunes block (signatories of the Peace Accords) will cease to exist in the new term.

The presidential race
Three interparty consultations (on separate ballots) will be held to elect single candidates for each coalition for the presidential race. The voter can only participate in one interparty consultation; marking more invalidates the vote.

For the center-right coalition La Gran Consulta por Colombia, there are nine pre-candidates; for the left, but without the endorsement of President Gustavo Petro, there is the Frente por la Vida coalition with five pre-candidates; and from the center, there is the coalition Consulta de las Soluciones with two pre-candidates but with a clear advantage for Claudia López, former mayor of Bogota.

Two of the candidates with the highest voter intention in the polls: Senator Iván Cepeda, candidate of the ruling party, and Sergio Fajardo, former mayor of Medellín, the second-largest city in the country, will not participate in these consultations and will compete directly in the May 31 presidential elections.

Cepeda, who won the internal consultation of the Historical Pact, Petro’s party, by a wide margin in October 2025 (with over 1.5 million votes), was barred from the Frente por la Vida consultation in a controversial decision by the National Electoral Council.

Left-Wing Candidate Iván Cepeda Leads Polls Ahead of Presidential Elections in Colombia

Historical Pact and Colombia Humana merge as a single party
The National Electoral Council, however, approved the merger of Historical Pact and Colombia Humana, closing weeks of legal uncertainty about the viability of their alliance and generating direct effects on the electoral scene.

With this decision, the two forces cease to operate as a coalition and instead consolidate legally as a single party.

In practical terms, the merger strengthens the Historical Pact on three fronts: legal, organizational, and symbolic. First, it reduces legal uncertainty amid the campaign. Second, it presents a cohesive political structure to the electorate, not a temporary alliance. And third, it consolidates the bloc as the main left-wing party in the country, which could influence the perception of stability and governability among its supporters.

Voting intention figures
A few days before the inter-party consultations, which is the major filter before the first round of the presidential elections, Cepeda continues to lead with a weighted polling of 33.9%, six points more than in January, showing that the voter intentions for him has not yet stagnated.

The far-right pre-candidate Abelardo de la Espriella is polling in second place, with 20.9%. However, the weekend’s marathon of opinion polls showed a halt in his momentum: voting intention for him dropped by 3.8 points.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

405
 
 

This editorial by Gilberto López y Rivas originally appeared in the March 6, 2025 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. The views expressed in this article are the authors’* own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project.*

In a recent urgent statement, the Network of Intellectuals, Artists, and Social Movements in Defense of Humanity (REDH) denounced before the international community the joint bombings carried out by the governments of the United States and Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran on February 28. This constitutes a flagrant violation of international law and—according to preliminary figures—resulted in the deaths of 201 people, 160 of whom were children, and left approximately 700 wounded. Undoubtedly, these bombings of a civilian target are a grave violation of the Geneva Conventions, international humanitarian jurisdiction, and the Charter of the United Nations, and are a war crime committed with the arrogance of those who believe themselves to be above the law.

The REDH denounced this criminal alliance as the same one that has bombed Iraq, destroyed Libya, besieged Syria, blockaded Cuba and Venezuela, and is perpetrating genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the occupied territories. Its ultimate goal is not peace, security, or democracy, but rather the perpetuation of a world order based on the plunder of resources, geopolitical control, and the annihilation of any emancipatory political project that dares to challenge its hegemony.

It is essential to reiterate a historical truth that cannot be hidden: the Second World War is not solely the responsibility of the German, Italian, and Japanese fascists; it is also necessary to highlight the clear responsibility of the British, American, and French imperialists in the outbreak of the war.

Those who make up this Network for Human Rights believe that the attack against Iran is part of a global escalation of war that threatens to unleash a conflagration with unpredictable consequences for all of humanity. Imperialism, in its quest for domination, is playing with fire in a scenario whose gravity demands the firmest and most urgent response from the people.

The REDH expresses its unwavering and militant solidarity with the Iranian people. Their pain is our pain, their struggle is our struggle, because defending Iran’s sovereignty is part of defending the sovereignty of all peoples of the Global South. Therefore, we urgently call upon intellectuals, artists, social movements, dignified governments, and free peoples of the world to raise their voices and take action in solidarity. We demand an immediate end to the bombings and that those responsible for these crimes be brought to justice before international law. No more impunity.

The REDH believes that, as the liberators of our America taught us, from Bolívar to Martí, and as Commanders Fidel Castro and Hugo Chávez reminded us in their unwavering struggle, the unity of the people is the only force capable of confronting and defeating imperialism. In this moment of defining moments, the slogan must be singular: unity of the people against imperialism!

Donald Trump effigy burns

Certainly, humanity today faces extremely serious risks of apocalyptic proportions, such as those that led to the last world conflagration, with the aftermath of at least 75 million deaths (military and civilian) between 1939 and 1945. Among these human losses, the former Soviet Union stands out with between 26 and 27 million; China, between 15 and 20 million; Germany, between 7 and 9 million; Poland, between 5 and 6 million; Japan, nearly 3 million; and the United States and Great Britain, between 300,000 and 400,000 lives lost due to bombings, famines, diseases, and the Holocaust genocide, which ended the lives of some 6 million Jews, Communists, Roma, homosexuals, disabled people, and sectors of the population who, according to the criteria of the Nazi-fascist genocidal regime, were taken to forced labor, concentration, and extermination camps.

It is essential to reiterate a historical truth that cannot be hidden: the Second World War is not solely the responsibility of the German, Italian, and Japanese fascists, who, desiring a new division of the world, unleashed the most terrible war tragedy in recorded history; it is also necessary to highlight the clear responsibility of the British, American, and French imperialists in the outbreak of the war. England, the United States, and France encouraged and permitted the rearmament of Germany; they condoned the rapid growth of its armed forces and invoked a supposed neutrality in the face of fascist aggressions against Ethiopia in 1935, Spain in 1936, Austria and Czechoslovakia in 1938, and Poland in 1939. All the Nazi-fascist aggressions of the pre-war period went unpunished, thus allowing the dreams of global expansion of the Axis powers to become a cruel reality. The English and French governments disregarded international mutual defense agreements with Poland and Czechoslovakia and the will of their people, shamelessly allowing the Nazi occupation of these countries.

In the 21st century, these traumatic experiences seem to be forgotten, and once again, humanity is in danger of a third world war which, if it were to take place, would cause the disappearance of the human species and the extinction of life on the planet.

The post US Imperialism & Zionism Are the Enemies of Humanity appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

406
 
 

This article by Wendy Vega appeared in the March 5, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

As a symbol of the resilience of thousands of women who share the loss of missing relatives or who have been victims of femicide, the Glorieta de las Mujeres que Luchan (Roundabout of Women Who Fight) has become the stage for a struggle that is, unfortunately, never-ending.

Previously, a monument honoring the Genoese navigator Christopher Columbus stood on Paseo de la Reforma. However, after a series of protests against this figure, who has been accused of initiating a genocide against Indigenous peoples, the Mexico City government decided in 2021 to remove the more than 144-year-old statue.

With the removal of the Columbus statue, the space in the roundabout on Reforma was appropriated by different groups who sought to redefine the roundabout to give their struggle a place where they could express themselves without fear of being repressed by the authorities, as well as share with other people who are also facing difficult times.

The Glorieta de las Mujeres que Luchan (Roundabout of Women Who Fight) began to be a meeting point for activist and feminist groups who day after day seek justice for their missing relatives and the hundreds of women who have been victims of sexual violence and femicides.

Thanks to this reappropriation of the roundabout, the Broad Front of Women Who Fight was born, which named the space as it is now known.

In addition to its new name, a statue of a woman with her left fist raised was installed at the site, as a symbol of the struggle of all members of feminist collectives and searching mothers, as well as a recognition of their resistance within their struggle.

The statue now installed is known as the Antimonumenta and is surrounded by hundreds of names of women who have been victims of violence, abuse, femicide, and social activists who have died or were murdered during their struggle for justice.

The Anti-monument on Avenida Reforma is a critical meeting spot and site in Mexico City for political action.

Wendy Vega is a writer and photojournalist, graduated from UNAM.

The post How a Group of Mothers Created Mexico City’s Roundabout of Women Who Fight appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

407
 
 

On Thursday, March 5th students from UNAM, the National Autonomous University of Mexico, held a memorial on the campus in the south of Mexico City for the over 186 girls killed in the US-Israeli bombing of the Shajarat Tayyibah Primary School in Iran on February 28. Most of the girls murdered by US imperialism were between the ages of 7 and 12, and at least 95 other people were wounded in the attack.

“I hope we are heard in all media outlets. The reason we’re participating in this demonstration is to prevent these kinds of things from happening: I think it’s an injustice. It is not fair to me that the world remains silent in the face of these situations. I think many countries are already involved, and one of the most important things is that we must raise awareness in the world that these situations should not be happening,” an organizer commented.

The altar featured candles, flowers, and handwritten messages to honour the victims, to keep alive their memory, and to express solidarity with their families.

Attacks on schools and hospitals during conflict is one of the six grave violations identified and condemned by the UN Security Council, as under international humanitarian law, both schools and hospitals are protected civilian objects, and therefore benefit from the humanitarian principles of distinction and proportionality. Direct physical attacks and the closure of these institutions as a result of direct threats have Since 2011, a direct attack on a school is supposed to immediately include the perpetrators, in this case the US and Israel, on the list of the United Nation Secretary-General of parties to conflict committing grave violations against children in armed conflict.

Also on Thursday, only six days after the initial attack on the primary school, the US and Israel fired missiles and hit two more schools in the town of Parand, southwest of Tehran, as reported by the Fars news agency. Several nearby residential units also sustained damage.

Video courtesy PressTV.


The post UNAM Altar Honours Iranian Schoolgirls Murdered by US Imperialism appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

408
 
 

This article by Jorge Caballero originally appeared in the March 6, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

In the late 1970s, amidst a patriarchal society, the Cine Mujer Collective emerged, a group of feminist filmmakers who found in cinema the ideal political tool to denounce the gender issues that defined Mexican society at the time. Today, almost five decades after its formation, this documentary turns to the members of this group to explore some of their films, and at the same time contrast the reality portrayed by the collective with the landscape that Mexican women face today.

Directed by Andrea Gautier and Tabatta Salinas, the film tells the story of the nascent collective during the 1970s and 80s, bringing its members together to reflect on their fight against gender violence, sexism, and their advocacy for abortion rights, demonstrating that these issues remain relevant today. “It’s an exercise in historical memory that celebrates sisterhood and art as a form of resistance,” the filmmakers noted.

In an interview with La Jornada, Gautier and Salinas also spoke about the origin, development and projection of the documentary Rebeladas, mentioning that their artistic intention was “to avoid a strictly chronological narrative, privileging the dialogue between past and present to connect with new generations.”

In another point of agreement, they mentioned that in this generational discussion, Rebeladas shows “what can be learned from the Cine Mujer Collective, because we need to recover freshness, urgency, and be less self-demanding, proposing a more punk and less self-censored approach to activism and cultural creation. We need to recover a more visceral and less self-questioning attitude, following the examples of previous generations.”

Regarding the previous answer, Andrea and Tabatta elaborated on the loss of freshness due to fear of what others will say and “cancellation,” and emphasized the importance of daring to be different without overthinking political correctness in order to regain innocence and spontaneity.

The documentary, which premieres this March 6th in theaters nationwide, features testimonies from the collective such as María Novaro, María Eugenia Tamés, Sonia Fritz and Maricarmen de Lara, among others.

Specifically, Andrea recounted her investigative discovery in 2005, the first contact with members of the collective, and the process of compiling archives and interviews that led to resuming the film between 2016 and 2023.

“I was looking for information on women in film and I came across it at UNAM in 2005. Women who reclaimed cinema as a political and feminist tool, addressing taboo subjects of the time such as abortion, rape, domestic work, and sexual abuse. That’s how I discovered the work of the Cine Mujer Collective, and then I met Tabatta and we started working together. We began researching the Cine Mujer Collective, contacted them, and brought them together for the first time in academic meetings after the initial research and early audiovisual recordings were compiled. That was the basis for making Rebeladas.”

Later, the directors explained: “The project evolved from the idea to production. Then in 2016 we got the project off the ground, which was a difficult thing, and it began its festival circuit, premiering in 2023. We always kept in mind the preservation of the interviews over the years and made the stylistic decision to prioritize emotions and intergenerational dialogue in the documentary, opting for a non-chronological structure that prioritizes emotions and dialogue with the present instead of a traditional biopic.”

The interview covered the reception of Rebeladas at festivals, its premiere at DOCS MX, its participation in the Morelia International Film Festival, tours with Ambulante and presentations with collectives such as Colmena.

The premiere in commercial theaters in the country, they confessed: “has us excited and we want to thank the team for having reached this exhibition channel, and we are waiting to see the public’s response to an independent feminist documentary that always has difficulties getting out into the open.”


The post Cine Mujer Collective Celebrates Sisterhood as Resistance in ‘Rebeladas’ Documentary appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

409
 
 

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) has announced staging the 17th stage of its ongoing Operation True Promise 4 against Israeli and American targets throughout the region.

The Corps made the announcement in a statement on Wednesday, the fifth day since the launch of the operation in retaliation against unprovoked aggression against the Islamic Republic by Tel Aviv and Washington.

“With the successful destruction of more than seven advanced radars, the eyes of the US and the usurping Zionist regime in the region have been blinded,” the statement read.

It also hailed bypassing the US’s THAAD missile system, which has been deployed to try to protect the Israeli regime in the face of the reprisal, thus striking the building of the regime’s ministry of war as well as the Ben Gurion airport, its busiest air terminal.

Attesting to the success of the operation, the Corps stated, was the continuous sound of sirens and the prolonged confinement of illegal settlers inside shelters across the occupied territories over the past 100 hours.

This verifies “the steady and managed rhythm of Iranian projectile launches for harsh revenge against terrorist criminals,” the statement noted.

“In the coming days, the attacks will become more intense and widespread.”

So far throughout the operation, the IRGC has flown hundreds of ballistic missiles and explosive-laden drones towards sensitive and strategic targets throughout the region.

The targets have featured those lying in the city of Tel Aviv and the holy occupied city of al-Quds as well as American outposts and interests scattered across regional countries, including Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar.

Other highlights in the retaliation have seen the Corps target the US Navy’s Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier as well as an American destroyer in the Indian Ocean.

Striking US’s ‘largest data center’ in region
Also on Wednesday, the IRGC announced staging a “critical strike” against the largest American data center in the region.

Qatar Fully Shuts Down LNG Production as Global Energy Markets Brace for Impact

It identified the target as the Amazon data center in Bahrain, saying the strike was carried out to identify the role played by these centers in supporting the enemy’s military and intelligence activities.

According to Amazon’s official report, extensive damage has been inflicted on this center.

Amazon’s regional office in Bahrain, which was opened in 2019, is considered to be the gateway for advanced Amazon cloud services to the countries of the Persian Gulf and elsewhere throughout West Asia.

(PressTV)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

410
 
 

Ecuador has declared Cuba’s ambassador in Quito, Basilio Antonio Gutiérrez García, persona non grata, granting him 48 hours to leave the country in a move that raises questions about the future of bilateral relations.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility notified the Cuban Embassy of the decision on March 4, invoking Article 9 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which allows a state to declare members of a diplomatic mission as persona non grata without requiring to justify such declarations.

This recent measure applies not only to Ambassador Gutiérrez but also to consular, administrative, and support staff accredited in Quito.

🔴 #Atención || Se reporta presencia militar en los exteriores de la Embajada de Cuba en Quito. Esto, tras la decisión del gobierno de Ecuador de declarar persona ‘non grata’ al embajador de Cuba, Basilio Antonio Gutiérrez García, así como a toda la misión diplomática de ese país… pic.twitter.com/OPolzRdDq4

— Radio Pichincha (@radio_pichincha) March 4, 2026

The official communication did not specify the reasons behind the expulsion nor whether it signals a rupture in diplomatic ties, but the measure enters into force upon signing the decree and entrusts its execution to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility.

According to this, the Cuban mission has 48 hours to vacate Ecuadorian territory.

Simultaneously, President Daniel Noboa signed Executive Decree 317, terminating the functions of Ecuador’s ambassador to Cuba, José María Borja López. The decree also ended Borja’s concurrent responsibilities in Dominica, Jamaica, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

The move underscores a significant shift in Ecuador’s foreign policy, coinciding with the meeting held on Monday between President Noboa and Francis L. Donovan, head of the US Southern Command, and Rear Admiral Mark A. Schafer, head of Special Operations Command South.

The expulsion comes amid growing Ecuadorian alignment with the US. Just one day earlier, both governments announced a joint military operation against “designated terrorist organizations” in Ecuador, an initiative praised as an alleged decisive step against narcoterrorism in the hemisphere, according to the US Southern Command.

The timing also reflects Washington’s increasing pressure on Cuba, as amid the commercial, economic, and financial blockade imposed against the country, the Trump administration has tightened new restrictions on oil shipments to the island.

Ecuador and the US maintain a security alliance that has grown stronger since far-right Daniel Noboa took office in 2023.

Cuban rejection
Cuba strongly rejects “the arbitrary and unjustified decision of the Government of Ecuador” to expel the entire staff of the Cuban Embassy in that country.

In an official statement, the Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs affirmed that this measure “constitutes an unfriendly and unprecedented act that seriously damages the historic relations of friendship and cooperation between both countries and peoples.”

Failure in Cuba’s Electrical System Causes Disconnection in Several Provinces

The Ministry categorically reaffirmed that the staff of the Cuban Embassy in Quito has strictly respected the laws and regulations of the country, rejecting any interference in the internal affairs of the Ecuadorian State. It also assures that these actions demonstrate “the contempt of the current Ecuadorian Government for the diplomatic practices and courtesies observed by the international community.”

“It is no coincidence that this decision comes in a context marked by the intensification of US aggression against Cuba and the strong pressures exerted by Washington on third countries to align with that policy,” denounces the statement, in a context of an upcoming summit convened for next March 7 with a small group of government representatives from the region in Miami.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

411
 
 

By Bruno Sgarzini – Mar 4, 2026

For a long time there has been talk of “militant or political” journalism as one that is done under political ideals. According to the conventional commandment, for example, any report, opinion column, report, covering a social struggle or reporting an injustice is militant. Or convey an alternative version of the facts of a party or a political awning stigmatized by traditional media.

It is not militant journalism, for example, what the multimedia corporation Clarín does in Argentina when it talks about “youth crime,” while entire cities run out of factories and thousands of young people run out of the jobs of their parents and grandparents. There are no “militant” journalists among those who forget to talk about the ghost cities that are created in front of Argentine society with huge pockets of poverty.

Neither are television anchors living in closed neighborhoods and on the air avoid naming Milei’s labor reform that takes away rights from his colleagues who work as producers and cameramen.

It is not militant journalism that of international news agencies that talk about a Cuba that “murders members of a boat,” without contextualizing the weapons carried by its crew or the shots that they threw to the Cuban maritime guards.

It is not the ones who reverse the facts at convenience: if Cuban military opens fire in response, they kill, if US nationals spend months with air strikes against boats in the Caribbean, instead, they are “narcos killed” in a “US military operation.” There are no murders, no extrajudicial executions, only criminals, or “narcos,” who lose their lives in remote bombings.

If there is an oil spill, or the pollution of a river by a mining company, it is an “environmental accident” that goes against “business social responsibility.” “Non-militant” journalism has its own semantics; in Gaza there is no genocide, but a war against “Hamas.”

Maduro is the leader of the Los Soles Cartel, not a head of state, Daniel Noboa of Ecuador, a legitimate president, not a businessman suspected of using his banana company for drug shipments and signaled by a drug leader of having ordered the murder of presidential candidate Daniel Villavicencio.

Manuel López Obrador or Claudia Sheinbaum, are under “narco control,” but Felipe Calderón and Enrique Peña Nieto had nothing to do with the links of their lieutenants with organized crime.

The killing of Ayatollah Khamenei is legitimate because it “murdered thousands of Iranians,” as well as an “attack on Tehran to destroy its nuclear program.” The United States and “Israel” “preemptively defend themselves” from Iran to avoid “being bombed in the future.”

But if Iran responds to rocket and drone shipments to US bases in seven countries, then that’s an “illegitimate and illegal” act that widens the conflict and puts the world at risk of a major war in the Middle East because of Tehran.

Rejecting Defeatism: Why Negotiation is Not Betrayal in the Face of US Imperialist Aggression Against Venezuela

The cruel “Islamic ayatollah regime” cultivates with its actions “chaos and destruction,” while Trump and Netanyahu fight it and detain it with preemptive strikes. According to this journalism is an existential war between civilization and barbarism.

With each fact, the hierarchy is reorganized according to the circumstantial interests of this journalism, which is not militant, but “corporate.”

(Diario Red)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

412
 
 

Canada must make “any sacrifice necessary” to protect its independence as US expansionist pressure intensifies, former Prime Minister Harper says.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

413
 
 

Historians and political observers criticize the Trump administration for attempting to justify its own foreign policy toward Latin America.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

414
 
 

Cuba’s National Electrical Union reported a massive power outage after a critical failure at the Antonio Guiteras thermoelectric plant, whereupon the energy authorities immediately activated recovery protocols to restore service in affected areas.

Cuba’s National Electrical Union (UNE, in spanish) reported a widespread disconnection across the National Electrical System (SEN, in Spanish) on Wednesday, March 4, affecting power supply from the province of Camagüey in the center-east to Pinar del Rio in the western area of the island.

The state-owned company confirmed the interruption began at 12:41 P.M. local time, following an unexpected shutdown of the Antonio Guiteras thermoelectric plant in western Matanzas province, attributed to a boiler malfunction.

Guiteras Plant Fails
The Cuban Electrical Union immediately activated recovery protocols to restore service to the affected areas across the island. The Antonio Guiteras thermoelectric plant, a crucial component of the country’s energy production, experienced a critical boiler fault that triggered its unexpected exit from the national electrical system, as authorities reported.

This singular event had a cascading effect, leading to the extensive disconnection that left a significant portion of the island without electricity. Authorities informed that they are currently working to assess the full extent of the damage and to bring the plant back online.

🚨 #AHORA || Se produjo una desconexión del Sistema Electroenergético Nacional desde Camagüey hasta Pinar del Río. Ya se encuentran activados todos los protocolos para el restablecimiento del SEN. pic.twitter.com/yMZK048Tey

— Unión Eléctrica de Cuba (@OSDE_UNE) March 4, 2026

Text reads: “There was a disconnection of the National Electrical Energy System from Camagüey to Pinar del Rio. All protocols for the restoration of the National Electrical System (SEN) are now activated.”

The reliance on aging infrastructure and the challenges in acquiring necessary parts for maintenance and upgrades significantly contribute to the frequency and severity of such outages, reinforced by the economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the United States against the nation.

Just the day before, on Tuesday, March 3, Havana experienced a prolonged power outage for approximately 19 hours, according to official data. The capital’s electrical company noted a maximum affectation, highlighting the persistent energy deficit in the country, which “depends on the availability conditions of the National Electrical System”.

Another Terror Attack on Cuba: The 66-Year War That Washington Refuses To End

U.S. Blockade Escalates
This scenario of instability is largely attributed to the intensifying oil siege imposed by the United States Government against the country.

A recent Executive Order signed by Donald Trump administration explicitly prohibits the importation of fuels by threatening to impose tariffs on goods from countries that directly or indirectly supply oil to Cuba. This measure has been widely condemned by various leaders and organizations worldwide, including the United Nations, as an attempt at economic suffocation designed to provoke extreme shortages among the Cuban population. Critics argue that this policy interferes with the island’s sovereign right to sustain its daily life and the functioning of its basic services, aiming to create social unrest and destabilize the government.

The restrictions imposed by the United States blockade severely affect the maintenance cycles and the acquisition of essential accessories needed to modernize Cuba’s energy infrastructure. Beyond the energy sector, these sanctions also impact the sustenance of basic and essential services such as healthcare, the production and distribution of food, and education.

The U.S. hostile policy limits Cuba’s capacity to respond effectively to technical failures in its aging power plants, exacerbating a challenging situation, as its authorities have repeatedly denounced it.

The consistent denial of access to global markets for crucial components and spare parts means that even minor technical glitches can lead to widespread and prolonged power outages, creating significant hardship for the Cuban people.

The UN and other international bodies have repeatedly called for an end to the genocidal blockade, citing its detrimental effects on Human Rights and the real development of the country.

This latest power outage serves as a stark reminder of the profound and far-reaching consequences of external economic pressures on Cuba’s ability to maintain vital services for its citizens.

(teleSUR)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

415
 
 

Experts say returning production to full capacity could take at least a month as disruptions ripple through global energy markets

QatarEnergy (QE) declared “force majeure” on 4 March and announced the complete shutdown of key liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facilities, putting roughly a fifth of global LNG supply at risk if the disruption persists.

Two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that state energy company Qatar Energy (QE) started winding down operations earlier this week and will fully stop gas liquefaction on Wednesday.

The shutdown is expected to affect exports of super-chilled gas produced at the massive Ras Laffan complex, the country’s main LNG hub.

According to the sources, QE will need at least two weeks to restart the liquefaction process after the shutdown, with another two weeks required to return production to full capacity.

BREAKING: Qatar is set to fully shut natural gas liquefaction today, two sources close to the matter say.

Restarting natural gas liquefaction after a complete shutdown would take 2 weeks.

Once restarted, Qatar would need at least another 2 weeks to reach full capacity.

Qatar… pic.twitter.com/YzLCXVpQ53

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) March 4, 2026

Qatar supplies roughly 20 percent of the world’s LNG, meaning the interruption is expected to tighten global gas markets. Much of the country’s LNG is shipped to Asia and Europe. China, Japan, India, South Korea, and Pakistan are among its largest customers.

The shutdown follows severe disruptions to shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which all Qatari LNG exports pass.

Maritime activity around the strait has slowed sharply during the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran and Tehran’s retaliatory strikes, preventing cargo vessels from safely departing the region, and raising insurance premiums to record highs, as many brokers pull their contracts out of the strait entirely.

Solidarity for Qatar, Silence on Iran: Venezuela’s Diplomatic Blunder Under US Pressure

Experts say restarting the facilities will be a gradual technical process. One expert tells Reuters that liquefaction plants must slowly reduce feed-gas flows before shutdown to protect equipment, while restarts require carefully staged cooling procedures to prevent thermal damage.

The disruptions extend beyond Qatar’s LNG sector, with Iraq suspending crude exports from the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region through the Kirkuk–Ceyhan Pipeline, removing roughly 200,000 barrels per day (bpd) from global markets.

Saudi Aramco also suspended operations at the Ras Tanura refinery, the world’s largest oil refining complex, after a drone strike on 2 March triggered a fire.

(The Cradle)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

416
 
 

This article originally appeared in the March 4, 2026 edition of Aristegui Noticias.

The Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection (PROFEPA) closed six real estate developments in Cabo Pulmo, in the coastal area of ​​the municipality of Los Cabos, Baja California Sur, within and in the vicinity of the polygon of the Protected Natural Area, for not having the mandatory environmental impact authorizations.

Environmental prosecutor Mariana Boy Tamborrell explained on Aristegui en Vivo that during the operation carried out from February 16 to 25, with the support of the National Guard, eight inspections were conducted and these projects were detected, which, by not exhibiting the required documentation, were immediately closed.

As a result of the operation, six total temporary closures were imposed on the identified developments: The Last Place, with 1.19 hectares; La Ribera, with 1.12 hectares; Costa Coral, with 24.9 hectares; an unnamed development of 15.7 hectares; Club de Playa Las Barracas, with 14.2 hectares; and another fenced property of approximately 0.23 hectares.

In all cases, it was found that works were carried out, perimeter delimitation was done by means of fences or walls and changes of land use were made in forest lands with sarcocaulescent scrub vegetation, characteristic of Baja California Sur, without having the federal authorization in matters of environmental impact.

Mariana Boy Tamborrell indicated that the operation was carried out in response to citizen complaints received and that the owners have a deadline to submit the necessary documentation and carry out the administrative procedure.

“Individuals have the opportunity in the coming days to present all the documentation and whatever is in their best interest so that the administrative procedure can be carried out, but for now, at the time of the visit, they did not show their authorizations, which are mandatory in environmental matters, and that is why we closed these developments.”

Regarding the characteristics of the projects, Boy Tamborrell explained that only one corresponds to lodging, while the others are residential developments, with sizes ranging from one hectare to between 15 and 20 hectares.

The Attorney General emphasized that Cabo Pulmo enjoys the highest level of environmental protection in Mexico, as it is a national park designated by the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas. Furthermore, the area is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and a protected site under the Ramsar Convention, as its marine portion contains the only living coral reef in the Gulf of California.

She pointed out that terrestrial impacts can directly affect the marine area and biodiversity: “For example, the water quality we have in the terrestrial area inevitably reaches the marine area, and it can and does have an impact on the species that are being protected here, in addition to the coral.”

“We have several species listed under NOM-059, which are threatened, endangered, or have some other protection category, and they can be affected by any activity that takes place in the terrestrial area. That is why this entire area is protected and has very specific regulations regarding the types of activities that can be carried out in this zone,” she added.

Boy Tamborrell emphasized that the shut-down developments lacked the required environmental impact assessment, a mandatory requirement for any federally funded project or activity in protected natural areas. She explained that “any tourism development, project, or activity requires an environmental impact assessment, which means that the developer must conduct a study of the site’s characteristics and evaluate the potential environmental impacts.”

In that regard, it must “propose mitigation and compensation measures to minimize all possible impacts.” Furthermore, it specified that this document must be evaluated by SEMARNAT, which determines its viability or whether additional measures are required.

The post Mexico’s Environmental Agency Shuts Down 6 Real Estate Developments in Cabo Pulmo appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

417
 
 

The Buenos Aires City Police cracked down on laid-off workers from FATE, a leading tire manufacturing and exporting company of Argentina, who were protesting outside the Ministry of Labor against the closure of the company and in defense of their jobs.

The violent incident occurred while union leaders from the sector were holding a meeting with Argentinian national officials to address the conflict regarding the 920 employes who were laid off. The meeting concluded past 11:30 a.m. local time on Tuesday, March 4, without reaching an agreement, extending the mandatory conciliation period until March 11.

However, the police attacked the protesting workers without any prior notice or discussion, raining down blows, rubber bullets, and tear gas. The police forces, under the authority of the head of government of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Jorge Macri, chased the workers and their families who were trying to protect themselves from the water cannons and police motorcycles advancing on them.

The protest, called by the Single Union of Argentinian Tire Workers (SUTNA), decried that the company FATE, presided over by Javier Madanes Quintanilla, is committing a fraud by failing to comply with an agreement ratified in 2025.

The pact granted the employer benefits in the non-payment of contributions in exchange for guaranteeing job stability until July 2026, according to SUTNA. The union pointed out that the company has not filed for bankruptcy or creditor protection, and instead has halted operations solely for commercial reasons.

Amid the paralysis of the only producer of radial tires for heavy transport in the country, SUTNA announced a plan of action that includes legal actions and the proposal of a “temporary occupation” by the State to preserve production and reintegrate the workers.

Various trade union organizations and social movements in Argentina, such as the Autonomous Workers’ Center of Argentina (CTA), the Workers’ CTA, unions of the General Confederation of Workers of Argentina (CGT), and various social groups mobilized in support of the legitimate demands of the employees and calling for the reopening of the company.

The organizations expressed their condemnation of violence and denounced President Javier Milei’s “economic policy that is closing businesses and leaving thousands on the street.”

The repression against FATE workers comes amid growing social tensions in the country, where workers are fighting for their labor rights and economic stability.

The unions and social movements that participated in the mobilization made their commitment clear, emphasizing that this protest action “will not stop: it will multiply” in the face of the lack of responses and the repression by the security forces.

Argentina’s Government Represses New Demonstration Against Labor Reform

The situation with FATE is part of the broader crisis in the tire sector in Argentina, which in recent years has faced tensions due to costs, imports, and a decline in domestic consumption. The crisis is characterized by the closure of historic plants like FATE and the request for preventive crisis procedures (PPC) by companies like Bridgestone, resulting in massive layoffs. The sector is facing a sharp decline in production and demand, exacerbated by competition from imports and high costs, surpassing the crisis of 2022.

The poor economic administration of the government is also reflected in increasing financial instability. In September, the rise of the dollar price and the collapse of bonds raised the country risk to its annual high, highlighting the distrust of the markets.

The intervention of the Central Bank of Argentina, which was forced to sell reserves, was interpreted by investors as a sign of weakness, deepening the crisis and the flight of assets. In addition to the economic losses, there is the political weakening of the government, with a Congress that has voted against key decisions in health and education.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

418
 
 

This article originally appeared in the March 4, 2026 edition of Des Informémonos.

Organizations expressed “deep concern” and demanded consistency from the government regarding its anti-obesity policy, after officials participated in promotional activities for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, an “activity captured” by advertising from the transnational Coca-Cola.

The World Cup trophy arrived in Mexico for a promotional tour of 10 cities in the country, a tour that began yesterday at the morning press conference of President Claudia Sheinbaum.

Corrupt sports spectacles that drain public treasuries and give Donald Trump peace prizes just go better with Coke!

The Alliance for Food Health (ASA) stated that the presence of officials in promotional activities of this type validates and legitimizes the interests of the transnational corporation that has contributed the most to the obesity epidemic in Mexico.

“In a country facing a health emergency due to obesity and diabetes, the primary duty of public officials should be to protect the right to health, act consistently with respect to current public policies that aim to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks, and avoid any action that could be interpreted as institutional support for products associated with health risks,” the ASA stated.

In the context of World Obesity Day, commemorated today, March 4, the public health organization noted that more than 75 percent of adults and 40 percent of children and adolescents live with overweight and obesity, which is a risk factor for other chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases, the leading causes of death in Mexico.

This obesity epidemic is linked to the high consumption of ultra-processed foods and sugary drinks. “It is estimated that the consumption of these beverages alone is linked to more than 230,000 new cases of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease each year,” the organization noted. Of these, 150,000 are caused by Coca-Cola.

The organization added that public health evidence has shown that constant exposure to brand advertising increases recognition and strengthens emotional association, especially among children and adolescents.

“When promotion is linked to high-impact sporting events and public figures, the effect is amplified; the brand becomes associated with positive values ​​such as success, celebration, and national pride.” Therefore, the organization stated that “celebrating sports should not become a platform to reinforce consumption patterns that harm health.”

In mid-February, it was reported that the multinational Coca-Cola sought legal protection against the ban on the sale of junk food in schools, arguing that it supposedly violated the company’s freedom to operate. However, the Fifth Collegiate Court of Mexicali, Baja California, requested that the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) exercise its power of review, given the case’s constitutional significance and importance.

The post Soda Sell-outs: Organizations Decry Mexican Government’s Coca Cola Promotion appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

419
 
 

“For sovereignty and the right to live in peace!” With this slogan, the International Platform for Solidarity with the Palestinian Cause called for a rally in front of the diplomatic mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Venezuelan capital, in order to express support for the Iranian people and government that are facing US-Zionist military aggression, including the assassination of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and systematic attacks on civilian infrastructure.

Activists, representatives of social movements, and citizens carrying flags of Venezuela, Iran, and Palestine chanted slogans against the disproportionate war by Western powers and the Zionist entity against Iran.

“They attacked hospitals, schools, and ambulances”
In statements to Sputnik, the Iranian ambassador to Venezuela, Ali Chegini, thanked the revolutionary social movements, whom he called “lovers of justice and freedom in the world.”

Chegini emphasized that the solidarity represents “all the peoples and countries that appreciate and value independence, justice, peace, territorial integrity, and dignity.”

He also provided chilling details about the nature of the attacks suffered by Iran. He cited two specific crimes as examples.

“In the early moments of the aggression, they attacked a girls’ school and murdered more than a hundred girls. Then they attacked a sports facility for women.,” he pointed out.

He added that several hospitals nationwide were targeted by bombings, including the Gandhi Hospital—named in honor of the Indian independence leader—where patients and staff were injured and the hospital became non-operational.

The diplomat said that this offensive is part of the broader imperialist aggression. “The criminal violation against Iran is the continuation of the criminal violation by the Zionist regime and the United States against Venezuela and Palestine,” he declared.

“We came to express our love”
Hindu Anderi, coordinator of the International Platform for Solidarity with the Palestinian Cause, explained to Sputnik the deep motivations that led social movements to march in Caracas.

“We are here because of our revolutionary coherence, militancy, and solidarity, which we also consider as the tenderness of the peoples and which is now our everyday life due to the situation humanity is experiencing,” she stated.

Anderi explained the multiple purposes of the gathering. First of all, “we came to express our love, our gratitude to the people of Iran, to the government of Iran that has been so good to the people and the government of Venezuela.”

US-Israeli War on Iran Is Not About Nuclear Weapons. It’s About Imperialism.

Secondly, the movements expressed their condolences for the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was the “spiritual leader of Islamic communities around the world.”

Another purpose was to condemn the death of civilians, especially minors, in the US military aggression.

The activist emphasized that the revolutionary commitment to the Iranian cause is part of the same global anti-imperialist struggle.

“We understand that united peoples together will be able to stop this barbarism that is destroying the life of the planet and the human species,” she said. “We had to be here, because we are Chávez and Bolívar, because we are with Maduro, because we are with this government and this revolution.”

She explained that, despite the adverse circumstances, “the people have the duty to speak, to act, to march. We cannot remain silent because silence is not a friend of oppressed peoples.”

The march proceeded without incidents and lasted for more than two hours, during which attendees laid floral tributes at the embassy gates and chanted slogans like “From Gaza to Tehran, one cause will prevail!”

(Sputnik) by José Negrón Valera

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

420
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Electoral Reform: Fewer spots and transparency in AI

President Claudia Sheinbaum clarified that the reduction in airtime for spots on media applies only to political party publicity/advertising during election campaigns and does not affect the official government time slots. The President also proposed labeling AI-generated content to combat fake news. She recalled Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s advice that the best campaign is door-to-door, with good sneakers for walking and a backpack from which to hand out flyers.

Mexico wagers for peace and diplomacy amid international conflicts

In relation to the conflict between the United States, Iran, and Israel, the President reiterated the call to prioritize peaceful and diplomatic solutions. Sheinbaum said that the UN must regain its role as guarantor of world peace and supported the Spanish Prime Minister’s stance of prioritizing the diplomatic route. She emphasized that Mexico’s foreign policy will always weigh in favor of peaceful solutions.

International conference convened by Donald Trump

On the conference convened by Donald Trump with Latin American countries, the President explained that Mexico will be attending only as an observer, after declining the invitation to participate formally. Sheinbaum noted that Mexico recognizes Palestine, Israel, and the United States, so it maintains a balanced position based on the principle of national self-determination.

World Cup 2026: Sports infrastructure and social legacy for children

It was reported that state and municipal governments are working on the construction and rehabilitation of 1,200 soccer fields as part of the Social World Cup project; 800 such fields will be new and 400 rehabilitated. It was also explained that the Junior World Cups seek to boost sports and training for children and youth.

Citizen participation in the 2026 World Cup inauguration

Sheinbaum announced the creation of a committee that will select the person who will represent her at the FIFA 2026 World Cup inauguration while she watches the ceremony from Mexico City’s Zócalo square. The committee will be comprised of soccer star Charlyn Corral, referee Katia Itzel García, and sports journalist Gabriela Fernández. Women between 16 and 25 years old can participate by sending a video to the mundialsocialgobmex platform.


The post People’s Mañanera March 5 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

421
 
 

This article by Braulio Carbajal originally appeared in the March 5, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Mexico City. Mexico’s food self-sufficiency – that is, its capacity to meet the population’s needs with domestic production – has deteriorated in recent years and is expected to continue its downward trend in 2026, especially in strategic staple grains such as corn and wheat, where structural shortcomings and a strong dependence on imports persist.

In 2018, according to estimates from the Agricultural Markets Consulting Group, based on data from the Agri-Food and Fisheries Information Service and the National Customs Agency of Mexico, our country’s self-sufficiency in corn was 53 percent and by 2026 it is forecast to be 44 percent.

This means that while eight years ago Mexico produced 53 kilograms out of every 100 consumed, by the end of 2026 the figure will be only 44 kilograms; this situation has generated an increase in imports.

In the case of wheat the situation is even more critical, since while in 2018 our country produced 42 percent of the total consumed by the population and companies, by the end of this year the level will be only 28 percent, that is, a drop of 14 points in eight years.

In 2018, Mexico was close to self-sufficiency in sorghum, producing 96 percent of national demand; however, this has fallen in recent years, to the point that it is expected to reach 84 percent by 2026. A similar case is that of beans, which then showed 95 percent self-sufficiency and now stands at 85 percent.

Eight years ago, the most critical point regarding grains was rice, given that only 24 percent of the total demand was produced in the national territory; this situation, far from improving, has worsened, given that it is expected to close 2026 at only 20 percent.

Juan Carlos Anaya, general director of the Consulting Group, explains that this drastic drop in Mexico’s self-sufficiency in basic grains is a direct consequence of the production model developed in past decades, which has focused on favoring export and agro-industrial crops over strategic grains.

In this type of product, food self-sufficiency is not only 100 percent, but in many cases far exceeds that range for export purposes.

For example, according to the analysis of the private organization, it is expected that this year self-sufficiency in avocados will be 195 percent and in agave 293 percent; that of parchment coffee, 140; that of sugar cane, 134; tomato, 215, and that of lemon, 128 percent.

“Mexico has a surplus in high-value commercial products, but a deficit in basic grains. In the agro-industrial sector, it maintains a structural surplus; for example, agave production is practically three times the domestic consumption, and parchment coffee and sugarcane maintain ample coverage of the national market. These are sectors with a clear export orientation,” Anaya emphasized.

The post Mexico’s Food Self-Sufficiency Declines appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

422
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—The Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV) has reported that the national economy grew by 8.66% in 2025 compared to 2024, following a 7.07% increase in the gross development product (GDP) during the fourth quarter of last year.

“This marks 19 consecutive quarters in which the Venezuelan economy has registered a higher level of economic activity, further strengthening its recovery process,” the institution stated in a press release published on its website and social media this Wednesday, March 4.

The monetary authority remarked on the significance of this recovery given the tightening of sanctions and aggression led by the US empire against the Venezuelan economy throughout 2025. The BCV noted that these milestones were achieved amidst “exceptional external circumstances,” characterized by financial restrictions and illegal sanctions that intensified during the final quarter of last year.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Banco Central de Venezuela (@bcv.org.ve)

Sanctions and military buildup
In February 2025, the US regime tightened its illegal blockade by revoking OFAC licenses previously issued during the last administration. This economic pressure was accompanied by an unprecedented US military buildup around Venezuela beginning in August, conducted under the pretext of combating drug trafficking. The situation escalated in December with the illegal confiscation of tankers carrying Venezuelan oil, a move designed to asphyxiate the nation’s primary revenue stream.

“The dynamism of economic activities that has been recorded since the second quarter of 2021,” the BCV added, “is an indicator that the Venezuelan economy is strengthening, advancing with poise, resilience, and confidence.”

Sector-specific growth
The BCV reported that oil activity grew by 13.4%, while non-oil activity expanded by 5.3% in the fourth quarter of 2025. Within the non-oil sector, the most significant growth rates were recorded in the following areas:

• Construction: 19.27%
• Mining: 19.25%
• Accommodation and food services: 8.17%
• Trade and vehicle repair: 7.21%
• Transport and storage: 6.95%
• Manufacturing: 6.05%
• Financial and insurance activities: 5.85%
• Education, health, and training services: 5.33%
• Agriculture: 5.10%

The institution emphasized that while oil contributes significant resources, activities such as construction, manufacturing, and agriculture generate strong internal linkages. By strengthening these value chains, the country ensures the sustainability of its economic growth.

Venezuelan Fishing Sector Grows by 23% in First Months of 2026

Devaluation and inflation
While the BCV has not published official inflation data in recent months, private economic firms estimate the rate was approximately 480% for 2025. This figure remains a significant challenge for the recovery process, despite the dual monetary environment where the US dollar has served as a reference for prices and payments since 2019.

The widening gap between the official exchange rate and the parallel market rate continues to place a heavy burden on consumer prices. In 2025, the official exchange rate began at 52.02 bolivars per US dollar and ended the year at 301.37 bolivars, representing a depreciation of 479.33%.

As of Wednesday, March 4, the official BCV exchange rate stands at 425.67 bolivars per US dollar, while the parallel market rate closed at 626.38 bolivars, based on USDT prices on the Binance P2P platform. This indicates that the US dollar on the parallel market is 47.15% more expensive than the official rate, a spread that incentivizes the use of black market references in retail transactions and maintains upward pressure on inflation.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

423
 
 

Editor’s note: On February 26, 2026 President Sheinbaum was asked if Mexico would resume oil shipments to Cuba now that the tariff threat had disappeared after the US Supreme Court struck down Donald Trump’s ability to impose tariffs, including the tariffs he had said would be imposed on countries sending oil to Cuba. Her response: “That potential sanction no longer exists, so we are reviewing it and we will inform you.”

Ninety miles from the US shore, Cuba’s people are staring at an impending US-made catastrophe. Next to water, the liquid most necessary for life as we know it is oil. Trump’s “Donroe” doctrine has forced Venezuela and Mexico, the two major suppliers of oil to Cuba, to stop oil shipments. In two weeks, Cuba could well be without electricity. The intended result: the end of a socialist experiment that has inspired anti-capitalist resistance around the world.

As Pedro Gellert, a longtime activist in solidarity with Cuba, tells us, Mexico is the one nation that has never blinked in its support for Cuba. It understands that if Cuba loses its sovereignty, Mexico will find it harder to defend its own.

Why does the US hate Cuba? Unlike Venezuela, Cuba doesn’t have any natural resources that interest the US. But Cuba has against all odds withstood US military and economic pressure since 1959. Punishment is not enough; it must be destroyed. Just as Haiti must pay in dollars and blood in perpetuity for having the gall to overthrow the slave-owning class, Cuba’s destruction must serve as a lesson to Latin America and the Caribbean: resistance to US domination is futile.

Like Cuba, Mexico has a revolutionary project of social transformation. Corrupt oligarchs finally have been made to pay back taxes, an amount huge enough to uplift the poor. Nationalization of energy puts the government in control of Mexico’s own natural resources. But its radical experiment is also being threatened.

The sovereign right of Cuba and Mexico to determine their own path must be defended — and not just for their sake. There is no line between the fight against ICE brutality in the US and the resistance to white imperialist domination in Latin America. If the Cuban revolution is defeated, Mexico and the people of the US will find it harder to win their own transformational demands.

Pedro Gellert

Pedro Gellert, a rank-and-file Morena activist, has been involved in international solidarity efforts with nations that range from Cuba to Vietnam to Palestine. Gellert formerly edited the Morena Internacional newsletter and has been summarizing and translating the Presidential mañaneras for seven years. Active with the Mexico Solidarity Project since it began, he has helped it broaden its reach.

We’re seeing a humanitarian catastrophe. What do you hear from Cubans?

The savage US blockade cuts off oil and thus electricity, making life unbearable in Cuba, almost impossible.

They have closed schools, and teachers are attempting to teach virtually, with students tuning in by cellphone. But in some areas you can only get electricity to charge your cellphones for four hours a day — and those hours might be in the middle of the night. Families have to get up and accomplish everything that requires electricity for the whole day in that four-hour window: charge phones, wash clothes, prepare food and so on.

If you live anywhere above the first floor, it takes electricity to pump water upward. So you can’t use a toilet, shower or faucet. In Havana, garbage collection isn’t the highest priority for energy use, so garbage is overflowing. That brings rats, mosquitoes — and disease. This is a conscious US policy designed to inflict misery on the people.

The larger economy? A big source of revenue was tourism, particularly from Canada. But now, Canada has canceled flights because they can’t refuel in Cuba for the flights back. And if you go as a tourist, the hotels are also experiencing blackouts — and forget getting transportation to go anywhere!

In addition, the White House has made pawns out of tourists to the US. Because of the Visa Waiver Program, citizens of France, Spain, Great Britain and many other countries haven’t needed a US visa to visit. But now, if they have visited Cuba, they must navigate the red tape of the visa process.

It’s dire. As of February 20, Cuba has about two weeks left of electricity.

When the Cuban socialist revolution took power in 1959, what was the reaction in Mexico?

Mexico knew about the dictator Fulgencio Batista, who tortured and killed his opposition and who had ties with the US Mafia and US corporations. Everyone welcomed his defeat. The Cuban Revolution gave rise to a new generation of Mexican radicals, who saw a small country that faced down US imperialism and that was building a society to serve the common people. Even the Mexican bourgeoisie and its party, the PRI, were glad to see Batista overthrown.

When US President Kennedy ordered the invasion of Cuba in 1961, Mexico opposed the invasion.

Mexico is exemplary in its defense of Cuba. It’s the only country in Latin America that has never broken relations with Cuba. When the US moved to expel Cuba from the Organization of American States in 1962, Mexico disagreed. When Biden didn’t invite Cuba to his Summit of the Americas in 2022, President Lopez Obrador refused to participate.

Former President of Mexico Lázaro Cárdenas with Fidel Castro

But the reactionary PRI party, which willingly collaborated with the US, ruled Mexico. Why did they always support Cuba?

The Mexican-American War of 1846 to 1848, which is called the Intervención Estadounidense en México, or the US Intervention in Mexico, ended with the annexation of nearly half of Mexico’s territory. Since then, the annexation has been a part of Mexicans’ deep-rooted anti-imperialist consciousness, and that’s true for the whole population. It sees the defense of Cuba’s sovereignty, from 1959 to now, as the defense of Mexico’s own sovereignty.

Generally, the PRI was progressive in foreign policy while reactionary in domestic policy. Their defense of Latin American revolutionary nationalism was popular — some sections of the Mexican left viewed the PRI as the progressive wing of the bourgeoisie. It brought them support from the global left as well.

But that policy was a fig leaf for their own suppression of any dissent to their corrupt authoritarian rule and their support for US capital.

Did Mexico provide more than statements of support for Cuba? And how has Cuba helped Mexico?

Let me start with the second question. First, for years Cuba has sent doctors to underserved parts of Mexico, particularly indigenous communities in the southern region.

Cuban doctors risked their lives in Mexico during the COVID crisis. Cuba also opened its medical schools to Mexican students. This medical assistance was not only for Mexico but for many countries of the global South, earning admiration, gratitude and political support. It was said, “The US sends soldiers, Cuba sends doctors.”

An exemplary program was Operación Milagro, or Operation Miracle, begun in 2004 in partnership with Venezuela’s socialist government under Hugo Chávez. The program sent Cuban doctors to the global South, where 90% of visually impaired people live, providing free eye care. They served over four million people in 34 countries.

Second, Cuban educators conducted literacy campaigns in poor areas of Mexico. These programs consolidated support for Cuba; the people saw Cuba as representing a new kind of society that cares for the poor.

Mexico helping Cuba’s economy? They paid for those doctors and educators. The health and literacy programs are free to the people served, but the governments pay for them.

But under Trump’s threats, countries in Latin America and the Caribbean are canceling the agreements that bring in Cuban doctors —another blow to the Cuban economy and to the health of those countries’ populations.

Given that Mexicans are in solidarity with Cuba, how did they react to president Sheinbaum’s decision to stop the shipment of oil?

The people blame Trump, not Sheinbaum. She’s made clear that she wants to send oil, but Trump’s threatened 80% tariffs on Mexican exports would devastate Mexico’s economy, and she cannot take that risk.

Instead, Mexico has embarked on a massive campaign of humanitarian aid. In Mexico City, under Mayor Clara Brugada’s leadership, all city legislators will donate one month’s salary to support Cuba.

Morena offices in every state are collection points for donations — and the Mexican government has guaranteed shipment. The government itself donated and sent the first shipment, and more is on the way.

Mexico’s three interventions in this Cuban crisis include providing humanitarian aid, pressuring for no US interference and pushing other countries, particularly Spain, to send oil. Sheinbaum has also offered to mediate between the US and Cuba on the condition that Cuban sovereignty is not negotiable.

What does the US want?

Cuba’s main revenue-generating “exports” are tourism and medical and professional services. Cuba isn’t Venezuela; it doesn’t have a lot of natural resources the US wants — this economic asphyxiation is purely political. Since 1959, Washington has punished this small nation, which has the courage, the creativity and the staying power to refuse to buckle under to US imperialism. The US can’t allow this rejection of capitalism and imperialism — its destruction is the price it must pay for thumbing its nose at the US behemoth.

And that’s why those of us on the left must do all we can to defend Cuba.

Meizhu Lui’s experiences as the daughter of Chinese immigrants and as a single mom led her to focus on addressing inequalities based on race, gender, and immigration status. A hospital kitchen worker, she was elected president of her AFSCME local. She coordinated the national Closing the Racial Wealth Gap Initiative, and co-authored The Color of Wealth: The Story Behind the U.S. Racial Wealth Divide. Liberation Road, a socialist organization, has been her political home.


The post Cuba’s Fall Would Hurt All Radical Projects appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

424
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the secretary of the interior for the US empire, Doug Burgum, have deepened bilateral dialogue, focusing on mining and energy. Burgum was greeted upon his arrival at the Simón Bolívar International Airport in Maiquetía, La Guaira state, by Oliver Blanco, deputy foreign minister for Europe and North America.

During a joint press conference at Miraflores Palace this Wednesday, March 4, the acting president announced the upcoming presentation to the Venezuelan National Assembly of a Mining Law reform, a key step to attract investment. This new legislation, inspired by the successful models of the Hydrocarbons Law Reform, aims to ensure that investments in Venezuela not only generate profits for the companies involved but also contribute to social well-being, care, and social protection of the Venezuelan people.

“The Venezuelan government is ready to address, through cooperation channels, concrete agendas that benefit both the people of the US and the people of Venezuela,” Rodríguez stated.

Strategic cooperation and legal reform
During the initial meeting, which included the US business delegation, key information was exchanged regarding investment flows and the implementation of new technologies for the Venezuelan mining sector. The agenda covers metallic, non-metallic, strategic, and non-strategic minerals.

Representing the Venezuelan side were Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, PDVSA president Héctor Obregón, Vice President for Economy and Finance Calixto Ortega Sánchez, Central Bank President Laura Carolina Guerra, and the appointed Venezuelan ambassador to the US entity, Félix Plasencia.

The acting president requested the cooperation of National Assembly deputies to expedite the approval of this legal reform. The goal is to present investment and development opportunities to national and international business sectors, highlighting the benefits of maintaining positive relations with the world and with the US. Rodríguez further noted that President Donald Trump welcomed this working agenda in a social media post, demonstrating mutual interest in cooperation.

The “wanted” list paradox
Many have noted that Minister Cabello appeared relaxed and comfortable sitting across from his counterpart from the US empire, despite being wanted by the US Justice Department with a US$25 million bounty. Analysts explain that this serves as evidence of US manipulation of its own definitions of justice and its readiness to sidestep its own rhetoric against Chavismo in its desperate pursuit of natural resources.

Economic synergy and historical ties
Secretary Burgum expressed satisfaction with the collaboration and emphasized that the opportunities for synergy between the two countries are “limitless.” He underscored the wealth of the South American nation, noting that Venezuela is an extremely rich country containing large reserves of oil, gas, and critical minerals. “In this vast world, we are geographic neighbors with great synergy,” Burgum stated.

The US official emphasized a long history of synergy between the two countries involving Venezuelan production and US investments. He reiterated that opportunities are currently greater than ever, a point made “crystal clear” by the presence of two dozen US companies—some of the largest in the world—many of which have previously operated in Venezuela. Burgum claimed that these companies represent billions of dollars in investment and high-paying jobs.

Burgum also stated that Acting President Delcy Rodríguez, like President Trump, seeks to eliminate bureaucratic hurdles to allow capital investment to flow, facilitating an environment conducive to economic development.

Tactical Retreats: Why Venezuela’s Revolution Still Stands

The US Secretary is one of the highest-ranking officials in the Trump administration to visit Venezuela since the military aggression of January 3, in which more than 100 people were murdered, extensive infrastructural damage was caused, and resulted in the kidnapping of First Lady Cilia Flores and President Nicolás Maduro were kidnapped. Burgum, a technology billionaire and former governor of North Dakota, also chairs the US National Energy Dominance Council.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

425
 
 

This article by Nancy Escutia originally appeared in the March 5, 2026 edition of El Economista.

With the publication of the new work schedule in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF) , the path toward implementing the 40-hour workweek formally begins. The constitutional reform to Article 123 to reduce working hours continues to generate concerns, especially regarding the consequences of non-compliance.

Although harmonizing the Federal Labor Law (LFT) is the next step, the penalties that employers who violate the law will face can already be anticipated, unless they comply with the changes to secondary legislation. The law already includes fines for employers who violate the permitted work limits.

Compliance with the workday is not only a matter of respecting the principles of decent work established in the Magna Carta, but also a responsibility that, if not fulfilled, can involve fines of several thousand pesos and even penalties punishable by imprisonment.

According to Article 68 of the Federal Labor Law (LFT), employees are not obligated to work longer than the hours established by law. Overtime is the only permitted extension, and it must not exceed 12 hours per week, as established by the labor reform.

Fines for Workweek Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with the duration of the workday currently carries a penalty of 29,327.50 ($1,653USD) to 586,550 pesos ($33,060USD), equivalent to 250 to 5,000 times the UMA (Unit of Average and Update in force as of 2026), according to article 1000 of the Federal Labour Law.

The value of the UMA (Unit of Measurement and Update) is updated annually, so the penalty will be calculated based on the amount in effect at the time the violation occurred. In this regard, it should be noted that the transition will take three years, as the penalty will be reduced by two hours per year starting January 1, 2027, and will conclude in 2030.

This is how the gradual reduction of the working day will be implemented in Mexico:

  • 2027 – 46 hours
  • 2028 – 44 hours
  • 2029 – 42 hours
  • 2030 – 40 hours

Who Determines the Fine?

The specific amount of the fine will be determined by the Secretariat of Labour and Social Welfare (STPS), which will consider the seriousness of the infraction, the employer’s intent, the number of workers affected, and the employer’s economic capacity.

In case of recidivism, article 992 of the LFT establishes that the fine will be doubled and if it affects several workers, the sanction will be imposed for each of the affected ones.

The reform to working hours includes a new limit of 12 overtime hours per week, and a cap of 4 triple-shift hours per week. These limits are important because, in addition to fines, exceeding the permitted hours could constitute the crime of labour exploitation, which is punishable by imprisonment.

The Law to prevent human trafficking classifies as labor exploitation when an unjustifiable benefit, economic or otherwise, is obtained directly or indirectly from the activity of another or others through working hours that are above what is stipulated by the Law.

In 2026 and 2027, the maximum permitted overtime will be nine hours, but if the triple-hour cap is not implemented immediately, a workday exceeding 13 additional hours could be considered labor exploitation. In 2028, the permitted overtime (including triple-hours) will be 14 hours, in 2029 it will be 15 hours, and in 2030, with the standard 40-hour workweek, the limit will be 16 hours per week.

In other words, once the 40-hour week comes into effect in 2030, and adding the permitted overtime, the maximum working hours will be 56 hours per week. Exceeding this threshold would constitute the crime of labor exploitation, which carries a penalty of three to ten years in prison and a fine of 5,000 to 50,000 days.

Furthermore, if the affected individuals belong to Indigenous or Afro-Mexican communities, the penalties will increase from four to 12 years in prison.

To ensure compliance, the reform to the Federal Labor Law will include the employer’s obligation to have an electronic record of the workday that includes the start and end times, data that must be provided to the authority when it requires it.

The post Employer Fines For Violating Workweek Limits Between 30,000 to 586,000 Pesos appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›