Latin American Publications!

125 readers
19 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
2051
 
 

President Diaz-Canel proposed proclaiming 2026 as the Year of Fidel Castro’s Centennial

On Thursday, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel addressed the National Assembly and highlighted the approval of the Economic Plan, the State Budget, and the Science, Technology, and Innovation Law.

RELATED: Cuba Recovers After Hurricane Melissa Damages Over 100,000 Homes

The Cuban President affirmed that the country faces a complex crisis exacerbated by the U.S. blockade and an uncertain international context, which threatens multilateralism, international law, and global peace.

Diaz-Canel emphasized that Cuba also suffers economic aggression through the intensification of the blockade, its inclusion on the list of state sponsors of terrorism, and the sabotage of international trade and financial transactions.

The President acknowledged that 2025 was a year of great challenges, but highlighted the international support against the embargo and Cuba’s inclusion as a member of the BRICS group, which strengthened its leadership in the global South.

He also denounced the U.S. doctrine of “peace through strength,” and stated that it seeks to impose imperialist domination, seize natural resources, and threaten Venezuela with acts of war and maritime piracy.

🇨🇺 El respaldo unánime de la comunidad internacional, a pesar de las sucias gestiones, las brutales presiones del gobierno de Estados Unidos y las falacias que este difunde sobre Cuba.#cubadebate #cuba #AsambleaNacional pic.twitter.com/G7tYW8lp0f

— Cubadebate (@cubadebatecu) December 19, 2025

The text reads, “The unanimous support of the international community, despite the dirty dealings, the brutal pressures of the United States government, and the falsehoods it spreads about Cuba, is remarkable.”

The President reiterated that Cuba will not surrender and that three principles guide it: unity, continuity, and creative resistance, to confront the crisis with discipline, innovation, and active popular participation in all sectors.

Diaz-Canel emphasized the need for macroeconomic stabilization, correction of distortions, and productive growth, with accountability and concrete measures to guarantee social justice and sustainability in the Cuban economy.

The President highlighted the importance of science and innovation as engines of development, which integrates universities, businesses, and local communities to generate practical solutions in production, energy, health, and daily life.

He noted that the challenge is to transform every law and plan into tangible actions. The President proposed proclaiming 2026 as the Year of Fidel Castro’s Centennial, and urged that every task be imbued with the Commander’s spirit of solidarity and commitment to social justice.

The President of #Cuba Miguel Diaz-Canel, denounced the #US security strategy, warning that it seeks to impose its imperialist dominance and threatens regional #peace. In this regard, the president condemned the growing and provocative threats against #Venezuela, under pretexts… pic.twitter.com/EVdVrDdDZA

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) December 19, 2025

teleSUR: JP

Source: Cubadebate


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2052
 
 

The National Council unanimously approved a resolution condemning Trump’s statements.

On Thursday, the President of the National Assembly of Venezuela, Jorge Rodriguez, presided over representatives from more than 30 sectors at the National Council for Sovereignty and Peace, in response to Donald Trump’s threats against Venezuelan natural resources.

RELATED: Venezuela Extends Russian Oil Joint Ventures Through 2041

Rodriguez asserted that the external aggression perpetrated by the U.S. seeks to control oil, rare earth elements, and water, as well as to annihilate Venezuelan identity, which he compared to hate speech toward Jewish people in the 1930s.

The President of the Assembly noted that Venezuela desires peace based on freedom and sovereignty, not the peace of the submissive. He remarked on the virtues of courage and rebellion that do not serve the imperial hegemon.

The National Council unanimously approved a resolution condemning Trump’s statements and reaffirming its commitment to the Constitution and the defense of the resources and rights of the Venezuelan people.

The most insane part about watching the U.S. steal an oil tanker from Venezuela is those of us who oppose this act of war are labeled “terrorists” to mask the truth: The U.S. empire that has spent the last 80 years waging war against the world to steal resources is the terrorist. pic.twitter.com/u1x43MPfB3

— Power to the People ☭🕊 (@ProudSocialist) December 11, 2025

Parliament Vice-President Pedro Infante emphasized the need to activate all capabilities in unity and constitutional clarity to defend the homeland. Meanwhile, Democratic Opposition leader Claudio Fermin denounced U.S. attempts to expropriate and confiscate national assets.

Center for Latin American Studies President Pedro Calzadilla expressed confidence that the people will triumph as they “did 200 years ago”. Reynaldo Quintero, President of the Venezuelan Association of Small and Medium Oil Industries, also called for collective action to protect the nation’s natural resources.

Deputy Nicolas Ernesto Guerra insisted on uniting national strength in favor of peace and dialogue and transforming popular indignation into productive energy to move forward as “heirs” of free peoples.

The Secretary General of the Council of #Sovereignty and #Peace, Jorge Rodriguez, denounced the #US aggression against #Venezuela, which seeks to seize its resources and destroy the identity of its people. pic.twitter.com/Gh3Lct3UFE

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) December 19, 2025

teleSUR: JP

Source: teleSUR


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2053
 
 

In a statement published Wednesday morning by Wikileaks, its founder, Julian Assange, announced that he had filed a criminal complaint in Sweden accusing 30 people associated with the Nobel Foundation, including its directors, of “committing serious suspected crimes, including the crime of misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and financing the crime of aggression” following the awarding of the so-called Nobel Peace Prize to the Venezuelan right winger María Corina Machado.

The complaint, filed simultaneously with the Swedish Economic Crime Authority (Ekobrottsmyndigheten) and the Swedish War Crimes Unit (Krigsbrottsenheten), alleges that the suspects, including Nobel Foundation chair Astrid Söderbergh Widding and executive director Hanna Stjärne, turned “an instrument of peace into an instrument of war.”

In the statement published on Wikileaks, Assange argues that Maria Corina Machado’s past and present actions categorically exclude her from the criteria set out in Alfred Nobel’s will, which explicitly states that the peace prize should be awarded to the individual who during the previous year “has conferred the greatest benefit to mankind.”

On the contrary, Assange argues that “Machado’s incitement of the largest US military reinforcement since the Iraq War makes her categorically ineligible” for the prize. Machado has been front and center in calling for the overthrow of Venezuela’s democratically elected government by any means necessary, including violence, for the better part of three decades.

The Wikileaks statement notes that the Nobel announcement and ceremony took place amid what military analysts describe as “the largest US military deployment in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis,” which now exceeds 15,000 troops, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford.

The escalation continues as President Trump announced on December 10 (two days after the Nobel ceremony) that US attacks would begin on land. The strategy for Venezuela is part of what Trump’s Secretary of War, Peter Hegseth, calls a shift toward “maximum lethality, not lukewarm legality” and toward “going on the offensive.”

Machado has incited the Trump administration to war against VenezuelaIn the text, Assange claims that “Machado has continued to urge the Trump administration to continue on its path of escalation” and has gone as far as promising the US administration access to US $1.7 trillion in oil reserves and other natural resources through the privatization of the oil industry once Maduro is overthrown.

“Using her elevated position as a Nobel Peace Prize winner, Machado may well have tipped the balance in favor of war, facilitated by the suspects named,” Assange states in the criminal complaint, which includes recent quotes from Machado that, in his view, incite war against Venezuela:

• December 15, 2025, Machado on CBS’s Face the Nation: “I say this from Oslo right now: I have dedicated this award to President Trump because I believe he has finally put Venezuela where it belongs, as a priority for US national security.”
• October 30, 2025, interview with Bloomberg: “Military escalation may be the only way out… The United States may need to intervene directly.”
• October 17, 2025, call to Benjamin Netanyahu about Israel’s conduct in Gaza: “The Nobel Peace Prize winner told the Prime Minister that she greatly appreciates his decisions and decisive actions during the war.”
• October 2025, interview with Fox News: Machado referred to US military strikes on civilian ships, which have killed at least 95 people to date, as “justified” and “visionary.”
• October 5, 2025, interview in The Sunday Times on the increase in US troops and extrajudicial attacks on civilian vessels: Trump’s attacks are “visionary… I fully support his strategy.”
• February 2025, interview with Donald Trump Jr.: “We are going to drive the government out of the oil sector… American companies are going to make a lot of money… Forget Saudi Arabia, we have more oil.”
• February 9, 2019, interview with El País: Maduro will only leave “in the face of a real threat from a more powerful state,” she claimed.
• February 25, 2014, testimony before the US Congress: “The only path left is the use of force.”

They point out in the text that the Nobel Foundation is guilty of “facilitating war crimes, including the crime of aggression and crimes against humanity, in violation of Sweden’s obligations under Article 25 (3) (c) of the Rome Statute, because the defendants are aware of Machado’s incitement and support for the carrying out of international crimes by the United States and knew or should have known that the disbursement of Nobel money (11 million kronor) would contribute to extrajudicial executions of civilians and shipwrecked persons at sea and are failing to comply with their obligation to cease disbursements.”

In the text, Assange requests the immediate freezing of the monetary prize of 11 million Swedish kronor (equivalent to about US $1.2 million) and any remaining related budget; guarantees of the return of the medal, investigation of the named individuals, officials of the Foundation, and associated entities for breach of trust, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and conspiracy; seizure of board minutes, emails, group chats, and financial records; questioning of Widding, Stjärne, and other Nobel Prize board members as suspects in the case; and thorough investigation at the national level or referral of the matter to the International Criminal Court.

A post on the social media network X by Wikileaks includes a screenshot of the message posted last night by Donald Trump, on his social media network Truth, announcing a naval blockade against “sanctioned” oil tankers entering or leaving Venezuela.

Venezuela Strongly Condemns US Threat of Blockade, Gains International Backing

About Julian Assange
Julian Assange is an Australian programmer, journalist, and cyberactivist known worldwide as the founder and spokesperson for WikiLeaks, an organization that publishes leaks of classified government and military documents.

WikiLeaks, founded in 2006, gained international fame in 2010 after publishing thousands of classified US documents leaked by former US soldier Chelsea Manning. Among the most notorious materials is the video Collateral Murder, which shows an attack from a US helicopter in Baghdad in 2007 in which civilians and journalists were killed in cold blood.

For 14 years, Assange was subjected to judicial persecution at the hands of the US and its vassals, which forced him to seek asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Under the government of Lenin Moreno, Ecuador withdrew his asylum, and he was arrested by British police and threatened with extradition to the United States, where he could have faced the death penalty for publishing the classified documents.

In June 2024, Assange reached an agreement with the US Department of Justice and was sentenced to time served (the five years he had already spent in British prison). Following the agreement, he was released, and he returned to Australia.

(Alba Ciudad)

SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

2054
 
 

It included major maintenance of 120 cabins and the replacement of 5,000 meters of communication cable.

On Thursday, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro highlighted the comprehensive rehabilitation of the Mariche Metrocable as a feat of Venezuelan engineering and the people’s will to guarantee a future of peace and justice.

RELATED: President Maduro: We Oppose All Forms of Colonialism

President Maduro affirmed that Venezuela has learned to overcome obstacles with creativity and innovation, demonstrating strength in the face of difficulties imposed by external factors. He reiterated that no external measure can stop the Venezuelan people’s determination to maintain their sovereignty.

The President visited the facilities of the Mariche Metrocable System in the Sucre municipality of Miranda state and verified its operation as a mass transit system that benefits more than 130,000 residents.

The restoration work included major maintenance of 120 cabins, replacement of 5,000 meters of communication cable, and the installation of 5,000 meters of fiber optic cable. The auxiliary motor was also reactivated, and the main electric drive motors were restored, which guarantees safe operations.

The Ministry of Popular Power for Transportation developed the project in conjunction with the “Together Everything is Possible” Corporation, with the support of community organizations and communal councils.

President Maduro also announced the 2025-2026 Communal Rice Plan, which encompasses 4,000 hectares under cultivation, reaffirms the commitment to the 14 productive sectors, and the continuity of national production.

#ENVIVO | El presidente de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro: En 1958 se aprueba el primer tratado internacional, firmado por todos los gobiernos del mundo, así que es obligación de todos los gobiernos del mundo calificar la piratería como grave crimen en alta mar y castigarla… pic.twitter.com/idqv0jtQJV

— teleSUR TV (@teleSURtv) December 18, 2025

The text reads, “In 1958, the First International Treaty was approved, signed by all the governments of the world, so it is the obligation of all the governments of the world to classify piracy as a serious crime on the high seas and punish it severely.”

The President remarked that recognition “belongs to patriots,” who are those who fight alongside the people and defend their ideals unwaveringly in the face of any adversity. He maintained that Venezuela has earned international respect for defending its freedom and advancing steadily toward peace.

He declared that “doubt is treason” when defending land, mineral wealth, and sovereignty. The President asserted that International Law condemns acts of maritime aggression as a grave crime, recalling the 1958 agreements and the 1982 treaties against piracy.

President Maduro denounced the seizure of the Zkipper oil tanker by the United States as a serious crime under international law and treaties. He affirmed that, despite aggressions, Venezuela will continue to position its products in the global market and defend the national economy.

He also announced the nationwide distribution of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, so that the people are informed of the inalienable rights that guarantee the defense of their nation.

#FromTheSouth News Bits | Venezuela: The State oil company PDVSA denounced a cyberattack against its systems, assuring that its core operations remain unaffected. pic.twitter.com/07XLBc7OWi

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) December 18, 2025

teleSUR: JP

Source: VTV – Radio Miraflores


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2055
 
 

Moscow and Caracas consolidate an alliance to protect the rights of the peoples of the Global South.

On Thursday, Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, warned about the foreign interests behind Maria Corina Machado and linked her to destabilizing projects. Zakharova recalled the failure of Juan Guaido’s coup attempt.

RELATED: Maria Corina Machado: A New Mediatic Show

The spokeswoman stated that figures like Machado and Guaido operate as tools of foreign governments that seek to create opposition structures financed to impose external objectives. She questioned whether they truly act in the best interests of the Venezuelan people.

Zakharova emphasized that, in contrast to these maneuvers, Russia and Venezuela maintain active cooperation in strategic areas, strengthen resistance against international pressure, and defend self-determination and sovereignty.

She also stressed that Moscow and Caracas consolidate an alliance to protect the rights of the peoples of the Global South. Meanwhile, extremist sectors persist with rhetoric of foreign military intervention in Venezuela.

A Venezuelan woman has a message for María Corina Machado: “We Venezuelan women are fierce fighters, but you’re a disgrace.” pic.twitter.com/gbk22X8YGY

— BreakThrough News (@BTnewsroom) December 12, 2025

The Russian position reinforces the rejection of foreign interference and supports political stability in the face of attempts to impose regimes subservient to Washington. It consolidates a common front against international pressure.

These statements came amid threats from U.S. President Donald Trump, who announced a total blockade on oil tankers trading with Venezuela and designated the country a foreign terrorist organization.

The White House carried out military operations in Caribbean waters to intimidate and seize commercial shipping, which Venezuela denounced as international piracy, and asserted that it will continue exporting crude oil to defend its economy.

#FromTheSouth News Bits | Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez: “The Russia-Venezuela relationship is unstoppable and indestructible.” pic.twitter.com/CjRA0uBtjk

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) December 1, 2025

teleSUR: JP

Source: teleSUR


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2056
 
 

By Maria Páez Victor  –  Dec 16, 2025

“Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro described the detention of an oil tanker seized by US military personnel in the Caribbean Sea on Wednesday as an act of piracy” (Orinoco Tribune, 12 Dec. 2025)

Trump, the president of the most capitalist nation on Earth, has dealt a blow to the very system upon which his country – and indeed most of the West – considers the bedrock of the economy. A blow that not even the most revolutionary person today would have foretold or thought to achieve. He has trashed the notion of private property and outright stolen a full oil tanker in international waters, like modern pirates, and kidnapped its crew. 

Since September, mighty US navy warships obliterated with military missiles 22 small outboard motorboats mostly in the Caribbean and some in the Pacific, killing at least 87 people. They were unidentified, unarmed, and there was no evidence of drugs. One boat’s two survivors, clinging to the wreckage for an hour, were not picked up but obliterated by a second missile later. These killings were all extra-judicial, therefore illegal as there was no due process, no chance of defence, no courts, no judges, no adherence to US laws or international laws, no respect of human rights or for age-old norms of seafaring rescue. Trump and his buffoonish “secretary of war” were judge and executioner. In other words, it was a premeditated murder.  By the precedent set at the Nuremberg trials, all who follow illegal orders to murder are also guilty of murder: an individual carrying out illegal instructions on behalf of a superior is not absolved of responsibility under international law.

The killings have been denounced by most Caribbean and Latin American countries, progressive NGOs worldwide, solidarity movements and most non-aligned countries including Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, the BRICS, China, Russia, Iran, Turkey, and the United Nations. France and the UK have spoken out, but only lukewarm nods have come from Canada and the EU. However, human rights experts and international law experts invariably have pronounced that these were extrajudicial, unlawful killings. 

But Wall Street remained unperturbed by the murder of seamen and fishermen.  The markets were not affected in any real way: murder in the high seas is “not their department”. 

Nor have the markets been affected in any significant way by the hybrid war against Venezuela these past years: the sabotages, the mercenary invasions, the cyberattacks, the exclusion from the international financial system, the UK theft of Venezuelan gold,  the theft of all Venezuelan foreign assets including its oil company CITGO, and the sanctions impeding the production and sale of oil by Venezuela restricting its ability to import food and medicines. Venezuela was not even allowed to acquire Covid-19 vaccines during the pandemic. The list of actions designed to impoverish and destabilize Venezuela goes on. It includes assassination attempts on Venezuelan leaders, the promotion and recognition of a false president, and the death of more than 100,000 Venezuelans due to the 1,000+ illegal, unilateral, brutal economic sanctions. The economic cost to the country is staggering: $232,000 millions to the petroleum sector and $642,000 million to the non-petroleum sector. 

None of these appalling imposed sufferings of Venezuelans seemed to impress in any meaningful way geopolitics or world markets. After all, what importance did a Latin American country like Venezuela have in the broad scheme of international geopolitics and economy? It all seemed to be confined in a sort-of private “quarrel” between the US and Venezuela.

Not so the robbery of a full oil tanker in international waters on December 10, 2025. 

After the news got out – with a handy PR video of the assault to demonstrate just how “tough” the US is – oil prices climbed immediately. Brent crude futures rose 0.4% to $62.21 a barrel, and US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures also gained 0.4% to close at $58.46 per barrel on the same day. Oil is very affected by supply issues and by restricting the supply of oil from Venezuela, the price of oil and price of gasoline can rise. 

But that price fluctuation is minor compared with the long-term risks which Washington has visited upon international shipping, especially its safety and security and that of its cargo.  Trump has said that he will seize even more tankers, increasing the already heightened insecurity and uncertainty. Will oil tankers now-on have to be heavily armed to deliver their cargo and protect their crew? The oil in that seized tanker was prepaid, so Venezuela has not lost the income from it, but since, in all likelihood, the oil’s final destination was China, Trump has stolen from China. This puts the seizure of the tanker and its cargo on a totally different scale of importance geopolitically with China as the victim. 

There is more. The enormity of the US assault on a commercial, civilian oil tanker that was carrying out non-military private business in international waters, is an uncommon blow to the cornerstone of the capitalist system on which the entire economy of the West relies: that is: private property. By committing such an impudent and openly publicized assault on a private, unarmed, oil tanker, the US Navy has committed – without a doubt – an act of piracy. The Venezuelan minister of defense has said, “It is a crude, rude act of cowardly thievery to appropriate resources that do not belong to you.” And cowardly it was, as we all saw the video in which marines armed to the teeth quickly grabbed unarmed seamen. 

It is worse than the piracy of old because in this case it is state-sponsored piracy. It is a grab at another country’s natural resources, as the US is obsessed with Venezuela because it has the largest proven oil reserves on the planet, and to do so it endeavours to turn its government into a lackey puppet that will do the bidding of the US and its oil corporations. The US does not want to buy Venezuelan oil, it wants to own it, as Trump openly declared in 2023. Therefore, it wants to bring down its present government and install a vassal state. No other nation save Russia, has received so many sanctions as Venezuela, and for twenty years the CIA attacks to undermine the government have not ceased. The sanctions have, however, failed, so now Washington has turned to the military “option”: to take Venezuela by force.

The United States of America is now a piratical country: an abuser of its own domestic laws and international laws. It is a lie that they took possession of the oil tanker because it was “violating sanctions”, when said sanctions are in themselves illegal and invalid. They are unilateral US instruments of harassment and interference in the sovereign affairs of other nations, not backed by the United Nations Charter, and the UN is the only mechanism to impose legal sanctions on a nation. The tanker assault also violates the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the UN Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation and is demonstrably contrary to the Geneva Convention. 

This armed robbery at sea was also condemned by the Non-Aligned Movement that comprises 121 countries, and which also condemned the US’s attempt to completely close Venezuela’s sovereign airspace which the US has no right to do. The US is undermining the Proclamation of Latin America the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace. 

A main concern, however, is the geopolitical risk of stealing the tanker. The US has trashed the one undisputed principle of capitalism: that private property is sacrosanct. This theft, unlike murder, instantly affected markets as the assault put in peril international shipping, the international laws and protocols surrounding it, and the protection of private property. If the US can do this, so can any other nation with the military force to carry it out. Might is right in this new order that the cruelty of the Trump administration is trying to enforce upon our civilization. 

Of course, Venezuelans have reacted in disgust, as recent polls show 96% of the population condemn the attack. But as well, there has been international condemnation from the Caribbean nations, China, Iran, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, and Cuba. China has pointed out how this assault created “instability in global energy markets and undermined international economic security”. China and Russia have been solid defenders of Venezuela’s right to self-determination and have shown their solidarity by helping with Venezuela’s defence. This is no small thing, putting Venezuela’s sovereignty in the middle of geopolitical concerns. because the US clearly and outspokenly, seeks to curtail any involvement of China or Russia in Latin America. 

Venezuela Mounts Full-State Rejection to Trump’s Blockade Threat, Gains International Backing

We must put all this in context. The war of Washington against Venezuela is not just about that country, but against all of Latin America and the Caribbean which the US insists is their back yard’ – with Canada thrown into the bargain. 

The new US National Security Strategy has been described as “the Monroe Doctrine on steroids” (The Hill, 15 Dec. 2025) The new Strategy is a brazen, shameful bravado of a bully that attempts to exert its will by force upon sovereign nations. It states: “After years of neglect, the United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American pre-eminence in the Western Hemisphere, and to protect our homeland and our access to key geographies throughout the region. We will deny non-Hemispheric competitors the ability to position forces or other threatening capabilities, or to own or control strategically vital assets, in our Hemisphere.” 

Trump has openly said: “You have to dominate. If you don’t dominate, you’re wasting your time.” Trump is ready to revive the belief that any problem can be solved by military force, even when other tools exist. He promises to use its “military system superior to any country in the world” to steal the hemisphere’s resources.” (V. Prashad, Counterpunch, 15 Dec. 2025)

The question of private property has long been debated in political science and philosophic discourse particularly, by men such as Proudhon, Fourier, Saint Simon, and Marx.   Proudhon famously said: “Property is theft”. Karl Marx refined the concept by pointing out that it is the private property of the means of production that is a sort of theft, one that basically acts to estrange people from people, and indeed from nature itself.  In other words, capitalism alienates people from one another and revolutionary movements throughout the world are concerned with the issue of private property and ownership of the means of production. The forceful theft of a commercial oil tanker in the high seas is indeed, by capitalist standards, a violation of private property and it is the seizure of a particular substance that is crucial to the means of production that are key to industrial activity. It has already increased the volatility of oil markets and oil transportation by this blow on navigational security. So private property is now a relative notion according to Trump, subject to the whims of the most powerful.

Trump has a new take on private property (or perhaps it is as old as the caveman with a club in his hand?): if we need it or want it and you have it, we will use our military strength to take it from you but you cannot take anything from us. And to gild the lily, the new, “improved” Monroe Doctrine proclaims to the world that Washington now says it owns the Hemisphere.

So, who will put the bell on the cat? How can Trump and his entourage be stopped?  He must be stopped by the combined effect of good people, inside and outside the US,  and courageous nations that are willing to stand up to a mendacious, murderous, thieving government, no matter how powerful. One must not cower before military technology but cast awareness to those who misuse it.

  • First, it is necessary that their legitimacy be widely questioned and unrecognized at every instance. The US has no right outside its own frontiers to interfere, harass and in any way influence the sovereignty of other nations. Other nations should not follow US illegal sanctions. It has no jurisdiction outside its own frontiers. As Human Rights Watch advocates, other countries should push back on lawless executions at sea as world order and peace depends on countries speaking out against violations, even when they’re committed by powerful friends.
  • Secondly, the prevailing international laws must be strengthened especially in terms of penalties to be applied if violated. Laws are useless unless they are enforced. The US must be sanctioned legitimately, multilaterally, by the United Nations.   Washington should be fined, sanctions, or at least all nations should refuse to buy military equipment from it. Its outrageous murderous acts and larceny should be enough to ban it from international organizations upholding international laws. The US should be shunned at every venue for its state-run piracy that includes murders.
  • Thirdly, in view of its unparallelled military resources, the US has become, more than any other nation, a threat to world peace and security. Accordingly, it should be required to forfeit its place in the UN Security Council.
  • Fourth, the countries of the world should increase their trading in other currencies rather than the dollar and ignore any illegal, unilateral sanctions the US tries to impose on commerce. Freedom of navigation and freedom to trade with whomever a nation wishes should prevail.

The Trump regime is fueled by narcissistic pride: hubris.  

And the ancient Greeks told us clearly that hubris ends badly.

In the 19th Century Venezuela led the way to freedom from an unjust empire. Today, in the 21st century again it is showing the way to defeat imperialism with its serene determination, its military/civil union, its communal councils, its strong network of allies in solidarity, and its fierce defence of its own sovereignty. It will prevail again. Bolívar was a greater mind and man than Monroe ever was. 

MPV/OT


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

2057
 
 

The country’s relationship with Cuba is a constant point of contention with the United States.

On Thursday, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum affirmed that the country’s relationship with Cuba will remain a “sovereign decision” and that it is linked to Mexican humanism. She rejected any “reconsideration” of support as suggested by the U.S. government.

RELATED: Mexico Would Never Accept Foreign Intervention, Reaffirms Sheinbaum

The Mexican President emphasized that people should not suffer the consequences of the economic, commercial, and financial blockade, and insisted that Mexico’s stance toward Cuba has been consistent since the administration of Former President Adolfo Lopez Mateos (1958-1964).

Sheinbaum recalled that Mexico was the only country that voted against the U.S. embargo on Cuba at the United Nations and the Organization of American States (OAS). She highlighted that today, numerous countries support the resolution to eliminate it.

The President noted that Mexico’s relationship with Cuba has been a constant point of contention with the United States since the Cuban 1959 Revolution, but that this should not influence the bilateral relationship between the two neighboring countries.

Mexico’s President Sheinbaum urges the UN to intervene, while Brazil’s President Lula offers to mediate, as Latin American leaders voice concern over rising US-Venezuela tensions on oil exports https://t.co/TyiEi4SaJ9 pic.twitter.com/45utatjVCJ

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) December 17, 2025

Sheinbaum emphasized that it is the Cuban citizens who directly suffer the consequences of the embargo, which has been considered the main obstacle to the island’s development for more than six decades.

Between March 2024 and February 2025, the U.S. embargo caused losses of US$7.5561 billion to Cuba, a 49% increase compared to the previous period. In the same period, the blockade generated losses of nearly US$300 million in healthcare and $496 million in energy, due to restrictions on importing fuel and spare parts.

On October 29, Cuba achieved another diplomatic victory at the UN General Assembly, with 165 votes in favor of the resolution demanding an end to the U.S. embargo.

#FromTheSouth News Bits | Mexico: The first Innova Fest 2025 has concluded, an initiative that promoted technological development with a social focus. pic.twitter.com/vZhXzACjtn

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) December 10, 2025

teleSUR: JP

Source: La Jornada – Escambray


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2058
 
 

Caracas, December 18, 2025 (venezuelanalysis.com) – The US House of Representatives narrowly rejected a War Powers resolution that aimed to preemptively stop the Trump administration from launching military action against Venezuela.

The bipartisan resolution, sponsored by Democratic Congressman Jim McGovern, called for “the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.”

House members rejected the bill by 213 votes against 211 in favor, with nine representatives absent from the floor. The voting was almost perfectly split along party lines, with three Republicans supporting the resolution and one Democrat opposing it.

Congressman McGovern criticized “cowardly lawmakers” for “surrender[ing] responsibility on matters of war to a wannabe dictator in the White House.”

“The Constitution is clear: only Congress can declare war,” he told reporters. “Congress must affirm its authority and say no to an illegal war in Venezuela, no to yet another foreign conflict over oil, and no to more endless wars—and President Trump must obey the law.”

The bill’s defeat reportedly involved Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth offering assurances to Republican House members that the administration does not plan to launch attacks against Venezuela and lacks a legal basis to do so.

A second resolution, brought forward by Democratic Congressman Gregory Meeks, proposed to curtail the Trump administration’s bombing campaign against small vessels accused of transporting US-bound drugs. The bill was defeated 216-210.

Since early September, US forces have struck 27 boats in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific, killing almost 100 civilians. The bombings, which have been classified as extrajudicial executions by UN experts, have drawn growing scrutiny from the US political establishment.

Several representatives have raised concerns that Hegseth might have committed a war crime when US forces executed a double-tap strike to kill survivors on September 2.

The House resolutions followed two Senate war powers votes that were likewise narrowly defeated, with similar reports that Republicans received behind-the-scenes assurances.

The latest legislative efforts came amidst the US’ largest military deployment in the Caribbean in decades and reiterated threats of military operations against Venezuela. US warplanes have repeatedly flown close to Venezuelan territory since September.

Though the initial justification was a self-declared anti-narcotics mission, the White House changed its discourse in recent days, with Trump threatening a naval blockade to stop oil tankers from entering or leaving Venezuela. Last week, the US Coast Guard led an operation to seize a tanker carrying Venezuelan crude in international waters and levied new sanctions against shipping companies accused of transporting Venezuelan oil.

US politicians and foreign policy analysts described the attempted naval blockade as an act of war. Blockades imposed without a declaration of war or that are not sanctioned by the UN Security Council are considered illegal.

Trump doubled down on the oil rationale on Wednesday evening, claiming that Venezuela “threw US companies out” and that the administration “wants the oil back.”

“They [Venezuela] took our oil rights, we had a lot of oil there, as you know, they threw our companies out, and we want it back,” the US president told reporters at Joint Base Andrews.

After coming to power in 1999, the Hugo Chávez government introduced constitutional and legislative projects to enforce the country’s sovereignty over natural resources and the oil sector. A 2007 reform determined that Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA must hold majority stakes in all joint ventures.

Some corporations, including US oil giant Chevron, accepted the new rules, while others accepted the Venezuelan state’s offers for compensation for their assets. A third group, which included ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, rejected any negotiation and pursued international arbitration. Some cases were settled, while others remain open.

According to Politico, the administration has reached out to oil firms over a potential return to Venezuela in case of regime change but received little interest in return.

For its part, the Nicolás Maduro government has condemned the US’ escalations as blatant efforts to take over Venezuela’s natural reserves in violation of international law. Caracas has vowed to continue defending its sovereignty and called for an international response against US attacks.

Venezuelan allies China and Russia issued statements in recent days criticizing Washington’s ramped-up coercive measures. Chinese Foreign Minister expressed his country’s opposition to “unilateral bullying” and support for Venezuela in a Wednesday phone call with Venezuelan counterpart Yván Gil.

On Thursday, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement expressing “concern” over Washington’s escalation. Moscow backed dialogue between Washington and Caracas and urged the Trump administration to avoid “steps that could lead to unpredictable consequences for the entire Western Hemisphere.”

Edited by Cira Pascual Marquina in Caracas.

The post US Congress Venezuela War Powers Resolution Defeated as Trump Claims to ‘Want Oil Back’ appeared first on Venezuelanalysis.


From Venezuelanalysis via This RSS Feed.

2059
 
 

President Sheinbaum opposes intervention and urges dialogue amid rising regional tensions.

On Thursday, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum expressed her willingness to convene countries from the Americas and other continents to seek a peaceful way out of any conflict in Venezuela.

RELATED:

Scientists Urge Global Scientific Community to Oppose U.S. Actions Against Venezuela

She said Mexico’s position — rooted in a historical conviction and a constitutional mandate — should be shared by South American countries even when political differences exist among governments.

“We do not agree with interventions… and we are in favor of the peaceful resolution of conflicts,” Sheinbaum said, emphasizing that the issue of President Nicolas Maduro’s government “is a separate matter.”

“The central issue is interventionism and interference,” the Mexican president reiterated, adding that the United Nations has many mechanisms to steer a peaceful solution with the participation of the parties involved.

"This is not about drugs. It's about regime change."

Bipartisan representatives in the U.S. House sought to curtail Trump's warmongering efforts against Venezuela last night by bringing the War Powers Resolution to a vote. It narrowly failed to pass 211-213, with nine members… pic.twitter.com/SalyryTrYu

— BreakThrough News (@BTnewsroom) December 18, 2025

However, Sheinbaum clarified that her government has not received any requests to lead multilateral efforts, nor has it established communication with any other government for that purpose.

The Mexican leader on Wednesday urged the United Nations to “assume its role to prevent any bloodshed and to always seek the peaceful resolution of conflicts.” Sheinbaum insisted that, on the domestic front, supporting nonintervention is a legal and political obligation.

“It would be extremely serious if the president of Mexico were to agree with any intervention, because it would even be violating the Constitution,” she said.

On Wednesday, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil thanked Sheinbaum for her call to the United Nations amid escalating tensions between Washington and Caracas, as the United States carries out an unprecedented military deployment in the Caribbean and and the U.S. President Donald Trump threatens to amplify the conflict to unpredictable levels.

What norms is the United States violating in the Caribbean? pic.twitter.com/3Zk9LQ3KsY

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) December 18, 2025

teleSUR/ JF

Source: EFE


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2060
 
 

This article by Gloria López originally appeared in the December 13, 2025 edition of El Sol de México.

In Milpa Alta, buying and selling are done in the old-fashioned way. There are no Oxxos, no Walmart, Soriana, Chedraui, or any department stores. The absence of retail chains is no coincidence; it’s the living imprint of a territory still governed by the land, memory, and community assembly.

According to a map prepared by geographer Mercedes Sánchez Plascencia and residents of the Milpa Alta community, there is a peculiarity that distinguishes it from the rest of the capital: it is the only borough that does not have any chain of department stores.

Its 12 villages, its communal identity and its land use, where 90 percent is communal or ejido land , have managed to keep it out of something that in any other part of the capital seems inevitable.

Milpa Alta retains what the rest of the city has lost: an economy built on community and the idea that prosperity doesn’t mean displacing your neighbour.

Alondra Aristeo Garibay, a member of the board of directors of the Benito Juárez Market in Milpa Alta, also originally from San Pedro Atocpan, explains it with the clarity of someone who grew up within a community tradition.

“We are an agrarian community made up of Indigenous peoples. Decisions are made in communal assemblies, especially when it comes to our land or our way of life. That is why we do not accept transnational chains ,” she said.

She explained that the way in which the inhabitants and locals conduct themselves is through communal assemblies where decisions are made, mainly to ensure that their lands, traditions and way of life are respected.

Photo: Roberto Hernández/El Sol de México

“The form of struggle and resistance is for our community, our town, and our people. So that is the main reason, in addition to the fact that we have the advantage that our land is communal, so that gives us a certain position and right to decide over our land,” she emphasized.

The reason is simple: their local economy isn’t squeezed out by large department store chains. The community protects its local businesses, grows its own food, sells it, and consumes it.

For Alondra, Milpa Alta retains what the rest of the city has lost: an economy built on community and the idea that prosperity doesn’t mean displacing your neighbor. She observes what’s happening outside the district: empty markets, dwindling street markets, and small businesses struggling to survive. Here, on the other hand, the flow never stops.

Photo: Roberto Hernández/El Sol de México

“Look at this market, there are always people. And what is earned here is reinvested right here. We spend here, we consume here, we work here. It is our form of resistance,” she emphasized.

The young woman has been working in local commerce for four years, but her connection to it runs deeper. She studied sociology at UNAM. Her academic background gave her the tools to understand her community.

“My family has always been merchants or workers. I have family members who work the land, growing corn and prickly pear cactus; and others who are involved in business. Thanks to them, we have been able to maintain a good standard of living through our local economy,” she added.

Locals recall recent meetings to prevent the establishment of shops and services that did not respect community rules. A DHL (parcel delivery service) managed to set up shop, but only after lengthy negotiations and under an unusual condition for a global company: participating in traditional festivals and understanding community life.

In Milpa Alta, it’s common to see entire streets lined with shops that meet the needs of the local population without belonging to the large chains or brands seen in other boroughs. / Photo: Roberto Hernández/El Sol de México

“Let them know what it means to be here,” say the neighbours.

The communities know this; they recognize that they don’t need a store. “We don’t need an Oxxo,” “There’s a store on every corner, we don’t affect each other,” say the local residents.

A few aisles away, Judith Cabello Mendoza, 67, smiles when asked about the absence of chain stores.

“We grow red corn and make mole properly, the way it should be done. I buy my meat, my free-range eggs, and my nopales here. Everything I need is here or at the collection point,” she says while holding a bag full of corn on the cob and squash.

For her, the entry of large supermarkets would be an irreparable loss.

“If those stores come in, they’ll take away our sales. And we wouldn’t eat as well anymore. What we grow and make would be displaced. In the city, tortillas taste awful; here we still cook with epazote,” she says, laughing.

Judith acknowledges that some services are necessary: ​​“For example, DHL. I sometimes send mole, and otherwise I’d have to go all the way to Xochimilco. There are things that help, but a supermarket doesn’t. That would be unfair competition.”

For her, what’s being defended isn’t nostalgia, but a way of life that works. “If those shops come in, they’ll push us out. And we’ve lived well, eaten well, and worked well here all our lives.”

Most of the food sold in stores, shops, and markets is made with produce from local farmers / Photo: Roberto Hernández/El Sol de México

Ernesto Escandón, a local vendor who has been selling pancita for fifteen years, acknowledges that the preservation of his land has been inherited from his parents and rooted in the customs and traditions of Milpa Alta.

“Here we are very rooted in traditions. This municipality is self-sustaining. Nopal is a very important source of income, but the market is the main one. And that comes from our families, from how they taught us to work, to trade, to support ourselves and to defend the land,” he said.

In his voice there is a mixture of pride and firmness. He states it clearly: “We are very protective of the land because we love it. When a commercial store comes in, that’s a drain on our economy. We don’t need it.”

But more than an opinion, Ernesto describes a community mechanism that functions as an early warning system.

“There’s a lot of communication here. When we hear a rumor that they want to bring in a store or an Oxxo, we all get worried. We protect ourselves. We ask what’s going on. And automatically, people unite,” he added.

He has worked in this market for fifteen years and has no doubt that they can continue to maintain the trade in the area.

Guadalupe Chavira de la Rosa, a senator from Milpa Alta, recalled her time as head of the delegation in the district during the period 2000-2003, where nothing is transformed without consultation and without going through the communal or ejido authority.

That’s why, when people ask why there aren’t any Oxxo stores, the answer becomes clear: businesses need commercial space, and here, land allocation is decided by the community assembly. This filter prevents what in other places arrives without question.

“To change land use, it must first go through the recognition of its inhabitants ,” she explained.

Merchants and shoppers have organized themselves to offer only essential services such as banks and shipping services, helping them to continue generating local economic activity without affecting competition. / Photo: Roberto Hernández/El Sol de México

In an interview with El Sol de México, she emphasized that the inhabitants of Milpa Alta not only preserve their water forests, but also their way of relating to the world. “We are a community of customs , of strength, of identity, of a worldview that has prevailed for centuries.”

She emphasized that although chains have tried, their economies don’t need franchises, since San Pedro Atocpan produces mole that is sold throughout Mexico City; Villa Milpa Alta processes meat and sausages; and the mountain villages maintain their own value chains. More than three thousand nopal producers supply markets throughout the capital. Neighborhood stores and open-air markets are not only sufficient: they sustain the community.

“It’s a local economy that guarantees economic development without displacing anyone,” Chavira insists. Therefore, the arrival of a franchise wouldn’t just be a change of scenery; it would break a production chain built over generations.

The arrival of a franchise wouldn’t just be a change of scenery; it would break a production chain built over generations.

She emphasized that this struggle of the inhabitants will remain for a long time since it has been shown to be a form of coexistence that does not violate and disrupt their community, so it is an example that could be replicated in all the municipalities, where development is generated without displacing its inhabitants and without breaking the social fabric.

She recalled that even “charitable” donations from large business owners have been rejected. When a proposal was made to build an educational center funded by a private company, the local population refused. “They saw it as a threat. And so did I. We don’t need a donation from any company to justify an interest in our forests.”

The Senator emphasized that in a capital city where gentrification is rampant and convenience stores are popping up faster than the flowers of dawn, Milpa Alta maintains a different order. One where community life matters more than immediacy, where land cannot be bought, where language, music, and writing remain a living heritage, where an Oxxo is not a symbol of progress but of threat.

Some merchants say they rarely go to the Central de Abasto or other distribution centers far from their communities because many of their products are produced or distributed directly in their towns / Photo: Roberto Hernández/El Sol de México


The post Milpa Alta, The Mexico City Borough with No Retail Chains appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

2061
 
 

PM Meloni hopes for European Commission measures to address farmers’ concerns.

On Thursday, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni insisted that her administration is willing to sign the free trade agreement between the European Union (EU) and the Southern Common Market (Mercosur), depending on decisions by the European Commission.

RELATED:

European Farmers Rally in Brussels Against EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement

“The Italian government is ready to sign the agreement as soon as the necessary responses are provided to farmers, which depend on the decisions of the European Commission and can be defined within a short time frame,” the Italian government’s press office said in a statement.

Meloni expressed this position during a phone call with Brazilian President Lula da Silva, who said the Italian prime minister asked him for “a few days” to determine whether she would support signing the agreement.

According to Lula, the Italian leader reiterated that she “does not oppose” the agreement but said she faces “political problems with farmers” in her country. Meloni nevertheless said she was “capable” of convincing them to support the pact with Mercosur, a bloc made up of Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay, with Bolivia in the process of joining.

#BREAKING: European farmers want to break into EU headquarters.#Europe #farmers_protest
pic.twitter.com/E3dtkuhqau

— U R B A N S E C R E T S 🤫 (@stiwari1510) December 18, 2025

On Wednesday, Meloni had already said it was “premature” for Italy to sign the EU-Mercosur free trade agreement and that it would be necessary to wait until additional measures to protect the agricultural sector are finalized.

Speaking before the Chamber of Deputies, the prime minister said the agreement could be beneficial for her country, but stressed that “the Italian government has always been clear that it must benefit all sectors and that, therefore, it is necessary to address, in particular, the concerns of farmers.”

The EU-Mercosur free trade agreement, which has been under negotiation for more than 25 years, is at a crucial stage, with signing scheduled for Saturday in Brazil, although uncertainty remains due to doubts raised by key countries such as France and Italy.

#FromTheSouth News Bits | Argentina: At the recent MERCOSUR Summit in Buenos Aires, President Javier Milei officially handed over the bloc’s pro-tempore presidency to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. pic.twitter.com/diO82VREjB

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) July 7, 2025

teleSUR/ JF

Source: EFE


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2062
 
 

Nicaragua’s ambassador to the United Nations (UN), Jaime Hermida, honored all the peoples who won their freedom and sovereignty in the battle against colonialism and condemned the current expansionist aggressions of the United States in Latin America, particularly its military and political threats against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

RELATED:

Samuel Moncada: “Gunboat diplomacy has no place in the 21st century”

During a UN session commemorating the International Day Against Colonialism in All Its Forms and Manifestations, the Nicaraguan representative rejected any foreign intervention in the region and emphasized that Latin America is a zone of peace. “We will not back down in the face of any attempt at recolonization,” he declared.

He reiterated Nicaragua’s solidarity with nations living under foreign domination. He denounced the continued existence of seven non-self-governing territories and other peoples who cannot enjoy their inalienable right to freedom, self-determination, and independence, such as Puerto Rico, Palestine, Western Sahara, and others who are victims of “oppressive colonialism.” The struggle continues and victory is certain, he emphasized, echoing the historic slogan of the People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA).

He denounced the persistence and mutation of colonial vestiges into new forms of neocolonialism, employing sanctions, destabilization campaigns, exceptionalist policies, and arrogant and sham security measures.

He made it clear that the purpose of these political maneuvers is to dominate peoples and seize their resources, in direct attack on the Charter of the United Nations and international law.

Hermida also condemned the imposition of unilateral restrictive measures by the United States and its satellite nations, which constitute a gross violation of the rights of peoples and have adverse impacts on health, food security, and other areas.


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2063
 
 

Speaking at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, on the occasion of the International Day against Colonialism, the Venezuelan diplomat remembered the pronouncements made by US President Donald Trump on December 16.

He noted that on that day Trump announced to the world that “Venezuelan lands and oil belong to him and must be handed over immediately,” because if his orders are not obeyed, the most powerful navy in history will impose a naval and air blockade on Venezuela.

Moncada stated that with this declaration, there is no legal instrument that can stand against this “monstrous declaration.”

In this regard, he cited the UN Charter, customary international law, Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, the jurisprudence of international courts, and the German Convention.

The ambassador stated, “This is a grotesque violation of all civilizational norms, and that is colonialism, a crime of aggression.”

He asserted that the United States is imposing chaos and destruction on international relations “in the same way that malign actors did prior to World War II.” He reaffirmed that gunboat diplomacy has no place in the 21st century.

jdt/arc/jcd

The post Venezuela says Trump wants to turn back the clock 200 years first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2064
 
 

This has allowed for the recovery of 422 MW in distributed generation, bringing the total to over 1,000 MW, and an additional 228 MW in centralized generation.

Furthermore, 778 MW have been synchronized with the installation of 41 photovoltaic solar parks, which are producing more than 30 percent of the country’s total generation during peak sunlight hours.

“Despite the work done, the situation of the national power system remains very complex, with an average daily deficit of 1,500 to 1,700 MW.

In recent days, the deficit has exceeded 2,000 MW, causing service disruptions 24 hours a day, exacerbating public discontent and damaging the economy,” he noted.

He also added that the deficit is mainly due to the instability of electricity generation and the lack of fuel for distributed generation, with approximately 1,000 MW of capacity unavailable for this reason.

jdt/arc/bbb

The post Cuba works on recovering the National Power Grid first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2065
 
 

This has allowed for the recovery of 422 MW in distributed generation, bringing the total to over 1,000 MW, and an additional 228 MW in centralized generation.

Furthermore, 778 MW have been synchronized with the installation of 41 photovoltaic solar parks, which are producing more than 30 percent of the country’s total generation during peak sunlight hours.

“Despite the work done, the situation of the national power system remains very complex, with an average daily deficit of 1,500 to 1,700 MW.

In recent days, the deficit has exceeded 2,000 MW, causing service disruptions 24 hours a day, exacerbating public discontent and damaging the economy,” he noted.

He also added that the deficit is mainly due to the instability of electricity generation and the lack of fuel for distributed generation, with approximately 1,000 MW of capacity unavailable for this reason.

jdt/arc/bbb

The post Cuba works on recovering the National Power Grid first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2066
 
 

Referring to this goal, Cuban Prime Minister Manuel Marrero stated that agricultural production is recovering, although it remains far from meeting the population’s demand.

He also affirmed that all regions of the country are meeting the indicators for urban, suburban, and family agriculture, and that more than 30,000 family gardens or plots and 40,000 organic gardens have been incorporated into this sector.

He further noted progress in contracting various production methods for next year and pointed out that the process of preparing food balances at the municipal level has shown improvements, although shortcomings persist.

Regarding payment delays to producers, he stated that they amount to approximately 1.192 billion pesos, figures that have decreased but are still high.

Furthermore, he noted that, in order to incentivate the import of raw materials and intermediate goods, the extension of deadlines for existing bonuses and exemptions was approved, and 100 new tariff classifications were incorporated.

“Given the existing complexities, it is essential to understand that the safest foods we will have are those we ourselves are able to produce ,” he emphasized.

jdt/arc/bbb

The post Cuban Parliament analyzes measures to increase production first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2067
 
 

On this topic, Cuban Prime Minister Manuel Marrero announced the creation of the National Institute for the Administration of State Enterprises, which is currently developing its structure and selecting its personnel and workers.

“During the year, 77 new state enterprises were established, bringing the total to 330. 816 private companies and two non-agricultural cooperatives were also registered.

The regulation of wholesale trade for non-state economic actors was approved, eliminating the requirement that wholesale operations be carried out exclusively through state entities,” he noted.

According to Marrero, the decentralization of the authority to approve the creation of private entities and non-agricultural cooperatives is progressing slowly.

“This authority has been granted to 65 municipalities, and a methodology for monitoring and supporting entities that declare losses has been implemented,” he added.

The Prime Minister highlighted the positive impact on economic recovery of the new measure regarding partnerships between state-owned and private business entities, approved by the Council of State.

This regulation includes the possibility of entering into economic partnership agreements with contributions and the creation of joint ventures.

The business models also include franchise agreements and the participation of Cuban nationals residing both in Cuba and abroad.

jdt/arc/bbb

The post Cuba focuses on developing socialist state enterprises first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2068
 
 

Speaking at the Sixth Ordinary Session of the National Assembly of People’s Power (ANPP, parliament), the official assured that the goal for 2026 is to stabilize the economy, increase foreign exchange earnings, and boost national production.

The economic plan for next year aims to promote decentralization and strengthen social policies, defining a set of prioritized objectives of vital importance for economic and social recovery.

Firstly, Alonso said, the plan seeks macroeconomic stabilization through actions that contribute to the gradual reduction of existing imbalances, increase foreign exchange earnings, and incentivize national production, with an emphasis on food and import substitution, among other objectives.

The strategy includes the comprehensive transformation of the Socialist State Enterprise with the effective participation and integration of other economic actors, the consolidation of the decentralization of powers to the territories to foster greater territorial autonomy, the gradual restoration of the national power grid’s capacity, and the acceleration of renewable energy sources.

It also considers the contributions of science, technology, innovation, communication, and digital transformation to drive economic and social development.

Under this scenario, the nation projects total exports of goods and services exceeding the current year’s estimate by 1.122 billion. This growth is based on exports of goods totaling 2.530 billion and services totaling 100 million.

jdt/arc/evm

The post Cuba prioritizes resource allocation to key areas first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2069
 
 

Presenting the results of the government program to correct distortions and revitalize the economy to the National Assembly, Marrero emphasized that the defense of the homeland, the protection of the population, and national security are strategic priorities of the Cuban state.

In this regard, he stressed the crucial role of the combatants from the Ministries of the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FAR) and the Interior (Minint), who, in close collaboration with the Party, the Government, and mass organizations, have intensified their training in response to the worsening situation in the region.

Marrero reported that progress is being made in restructuring the central government, with the goal of reducing the number of agencies within the Central State Administration.

In the health sector, he said that despite the actions taken, infant mortality is worsening, with a rate of 9.8 per 1,000 live births, compared to 7.0 in the same period of the previous year.

Meanwhile, in Education, the implementation of the Program to Improve the Quality of the Teaching Process continues.

The Prime Minister noted that one of the greatest national challenges is demographic trends, as Cuba is projected to end 2025 with 9.6 million inhabitants, a figure that will decrease to 7.7 million by 2050.

jdt/arc/mks

The post Cuba committed to social justice, says Prime Minister first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

2070
 
 

U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean undermines regional peace and cooperation.

On Wednesday, Venezuelan scientists issued a statement rejecting threats by U.S. President Donald Trump against Venezuela and calling on the international scientific community to oppose military actions that could lead to a breakdown of peace in Latin America and the Caribbean.

RELATED:

Cuba Denounces US Aggression Against Venezuela and Rejects Naval Blockade in the Caribbean

Science and Technology Minister Gabriela Jimenez informed that the Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research (IVIC) called on universities, academies and researchers around the world to “firmly defend that academic cooperation cannot be curtailed, subordinated or fragmented by imperial ambitions.” The following is the statement that Venezuelan scientists addressed to the peoples of the world:

“U.S. president’s recent public statements, which include explicit threats of military siege, naval and air blockade, collective sanctions on energy flows and the criminalization of the Venezuelan state, worsen an already delicate situation that was deliberately and illegally created by his own administration.

This unfounded proclamation has immediate material consequences, regardless of whether it is ultimately carried out, as it increases uncertainty, hinders legitimate commercial and scientific cooperation, and serves as justification for other vassal governments of the empire to impose new restrictions out of fear of secondary sanctions or of further damaging their already deteriorated reputations.

Former US Ambassador Chas Freeman on whether Venezuela poses a threat to the US:

“It’s not even a significant drug source. The boats aren't even headed to the US. This is entirely concocted — about as truthful as Hitler’s claim that the Poles attacked him in 1939." pic.twitter.com/9Kpl9gaAQj

— Steve Hanke (@steve_hanke) December 12, 2025

For the noble Venezuelan people, the cumulative impact has been tangible and quantifiable. Restrictions on financial transactions and maritime transport have made it difficult to acquire medicines, medical equipment, laboratory reagents, food production inputs, spare parts for basic services and for power generation and water systems, access to essential supplies for food production, among a long list of exceptional and everyday impacts.

From the realms of science, technology, innovation and their applications for the common good, the disruption of oil exports and the paralysis of the maritime logistics chain undermine the technical sustainability of critical infrastructure and weaken the capacity to maintain, modernize and safely operate complex systems.

Energy revenues finance not only the ambitious social policies of the Bolivarian government, but also national research, development and innovation programs, postgraduate professional training, and applied technological development for the direct benefit of the Venezuelan people.

Their coercive obstruction causes long-term structural damage not only in our country, but also destabilizes the entire region, with effects that cannot be measured through short-term macroeconomic indicators.

It is essential to emphasize that restricting access to knowledge, equipment, mobility and cooperation contradicts the spirit and the letter of international commitments that recognize science and technology as instruments for peace, sustainable development, collective well-being and, most importantly, as a human right.

We categorically reject the attack on the national sovereignty of our natural resources when the U.S. claims as its own all the oil, land and other wealth. The legacy of Bolivar belongs to the Venezuelan people, and we will never bow to any threat.

We issue an urgent call to the international community, multilateral organizations, academic networks and scientific institutions around the world to recognize the high human, scientific and technological costs of the criminal unilateral coercive measures and the hostile rhetoric once again hurled by the U.S. president.

VETS SAY NO!

Los Angeles marches against the Trump administration’s threat to wage a new war against Venezuela. No more blood for oil! pic.twitter.com/mZcbu8aX1x

— ANSWER Coalition (@answercoalition) December 7, 2025

We demand respect for international law, for the protection of life, and for the preservation of open scientific exchange as a universal public good.

We reaffirm, with patriotic pride, that the Venezuelan people know how to confront adversity with dignity, intelligence and an unbreakable commitment to independence.

As the Liberator Simon Bolivar warned: ‘The United States seems destined to plague America with misery in the name of freedom,’ and today, as yesterday, they will encounter the moral resistance of a people that recognizes its right to self-determination.

Today, we close ranks to defend peace, legality and national dignity, convinced that science is an act of patriotism and that, like its independence, Venezuela’s future will be forged through reason, cooperation and an unbreakable commitment to the well-being of its people.

At this crucial hour for the homeland, we express our absolute support and unwavering loyalty to Nicolas Maduro, the constitutional President of Venezuela. We recognize his firmness, courage and leadership in the defense of peace and national sovereignty in the face of imperial aggression.

Under his leadership, the scientific and technological community remains united and mobilized, ready to guarantee the nation’s comprehensive independence and to protect the future of new generations of Venezuelans.

The imperialist wolf is hungry for vast resources and has judged that the most defenseless, closest and most lucrative victim in its backyard is Venezuela. We call on all peoples, governments, and democratic actors around the world to raise their voices and say that Venezuela is not alone, that it is a free and sovereign people, and that it will not be recolonized again by any empire.

Down with imperialism!

Down with the methods of colonial domination perpetuated in the present!

Long live Venezuela! Long live Bolivar!”

It's not just US piracy against Venezuela that has people in South America worried. The Trump administration's announcement that it's bringing back the bloody Monroe Doctrine has set off alarms across the continent. My story @telesurenglish pic.twitter.com/wudMYrzvdM

— BrianMier (@BrianMteleSUR) December 18, 2025

teleSUR/ JF

Source: STM


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2071
 
 

The Permanent Representative of Venezuela to the United Nations (UN), Samuel Moncada, stated this Thursday that his country will defend its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independence in all areas in order to ensure peace in the nation. He described as a grotesque offense, a violation of all civilizational norms, Donald Trump’s declarations that Venezuelan lands and oil belong to the U.S. and must be handed over immediately, because, if his orders are not obeyed, the most powerful navy in the world will impose a naval and air blockade.

RELATED:

U.S. Blockade of Venezuela Violates International Law: Gen. Gerasimov

Speaking at a UN session commemorating the International Day against Colonialism in All its Forms and Manifestations, Moncada demanded that the White House respect the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of sovereign equality, non-interference, and self-determination of peoples.

“President Trump intends to turn back the clock of history and impose a colony on Venezuela. No legal instrument can stand against this monstrous declaration,” the diplomat stated, asserting that “colonialism is a crime of aggression” and that the Trump Administration is imposing “chaos and destruction on international relations.”

In Moncada’s words, “gunboat diplomacy has no place in the 21st century” and “colonialism must be defeated to protect all countries of the world.” He added that “the continued existence of colonialism is incompatible with the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as it hinders social, cultural, and economic development and undermines the ideal of peace for nations.”

#EnVivo | Samuel Moncada desde la ONU https://t.co/PR0XmfVqQq

— teleSUR TV (@teleSURtv) December 18, 2025

He expressed solidarity with peoples living under foreign domination, such as Palestine and Puerto Rico. “We urge the powers to respect their inalienable rights,” he demanded.

He also denounced the fact that domination operates with new and pernicious methods, such as the abuse of its structural power in global trade, sanctions and unilateral measures, and the abusive appropriation of natural resources and access to technology.

He added that to dominate nations, hegemonic powers use media campaigns, financial pressure, and unilateral measures, all with the purpose of destabilizing sovereign states and seizing their resources.


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2072
 
 

Iranian authorities on Thursday condemned the “threats” and “attacks” made by the US government against Venezuela following the “complete blockade” of vessels entering and leaving the Caribbean country announced by US President Donald Trump.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry stated in a press release that these are “illegal actions” against Venezuela and expressed its complete “rejection” of these measures, which demonstrate the US policy “based on the use of force and continuous harassment.” “This constitutes a serious violation of international principles and norms and the UN Charter,” it asserted.

RELATED

5 Reasons Iran Condemns Trump’s Venezuela Airspace Closure as “Unprecedented Threat”

Furthermore, it accused Washington of “violating freedom of navigation and maritime security,” as well as “freedom of trade.” “The actions of the United States to attack, confiscate, and obstruct the free movement of commercial vessels from Venezuela are a clear example of state piracy,” it lamented.

“Citing local laws to carry out and justify these unilateral and illegal actions cannot serve as a basis for legitimizing such criminal acts,” the text states, emphasizing that “no power has the right to interfere in the internal affairs of Venezuela, and that country has the right to defend itself against any external threat of aggression in accordance with the UN Charter.”

In this regard, it condemns “the continuation of US unilateralism” against “independent states, in the absence of a responsible response from the international community and the UN.” “The normalization of this lack of legality in international relations is a danger to, and could have consequences for, global security and peace,” it concludes.


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2073
 
 

They warn that this free trade deal would harm farmers, the environment and food sovereignty.

On Thursday, thousands of European farmers gathered in Brussels to reject the free trade agreement (FTA) between the European Union (EU) and the Southern Common Market (Mercosur). The massive mobilization took place at the same time as the EU’s annual leaders’ summit in the Belgian capital.

RELATED:

French Farmers Protest EU-MERCOSUR Trade Deal in Paris

The protest was organized by the Committee of Agricultural Organizations and Community Cooperatives (COPA-COGECA), which had asked citizens to hold a pedestrian demonstration. However, thousands of French and Belgian farmers drove their tractors into Brussels, causing major traffic disruptions Brussels.

Shortly after noon, the first clashes were reported. Police used tear gas and water cannons against the farmers, who say the EU-Mercosur FTA harms the environment and betrays the interests of European farmers, workers and consumers.

At the heart of producers’ concerns is the fear of “unfair competition,” as they anticipate the agreement would flood the European market with cheaper Latin American products produced under lower standards.

Since 2024, farmers have been voicing these concerns through waves of protests across several European countries. The protesters are also demanding the withdrawal of a European Commission proposal that would cut funding for the Common Agricultural Policy (PAC) by 22 percent.

🚨🇪🇺 The EU Deploys the Military

No not against Russia – but against its own Farmers – the people who work 365 days a year non-stop, care for the countryside and grow all food‼️ pic.twitter.com/Zf2pFSvcDA

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) December 18, 2025

The day of action reflects widespread discontent with neoliberal policies that, according to the protesters, prioritize the interests of large corporations over the well-being of farm workers and the food sovereignty of peoples.

As European farmers protested in the streets, Brazilian President Lula da Silva confirmed that the EU-Mercosur FTA will be signed on Dec. 20 after years of negotiations.

The PAC is the system of subsidies and programs managed by the European Union since 1962 to support rural development. The budget for the mechanism is discussed annually among member states to determine the level of technical and financial assistance producers in the region receive.

Founded in 1991, Mercosur is made up of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay. It also includes associate states Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru and Suriname.

#FromTheSouth News Bits | Argentina: At the recent MERCOSUR Summit in Buenos Aires, President Javier Milei officially handed over the bloc’s pro-tempore presidency to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. pic.twitter.com/diO82VREjB

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) July 7, 2025

teleSUR/ JF

Sources: EFE


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

2074
 
 

Mexico City. After 18 years of protest, the National Union of Mining, Metallurgical, Steel and Similar Workers of the Mexican Republic, headed by Napoleón Gómez Urrutia, announced the end of the strike they were holding in Cananea, Sonora, after reaching an agreement with the federal government.

In a statement, the Union reported that “after 18 years of struggle, miners from section 65 of Cananea, Sonora” approved a final agreement on the Comprehensive Solution Plan that was negotiated with the Government, through which severance pay, social security, and pensions for unemployment and widowhood are guaranteed for the workers.

“The agreement is part of a Comprehensive Solution Plan developed with the participation of the Mining Union, the President of the Republic, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, and the Government of the state of Sonora, within the framework of the remediation plan for Cananea announced by the Federal Government,” the statement reads.

In its statement, the Union explained that the strike broke out in July 2007 as a result of the terrible working conditions at the mine owned by Grupo México, owned by businessman Germán Larrea.

“During those years of strike, the mining community and their families endured economic hardship, illegal persecution, and the irreparable loss of valuable colleagues, always with the firm conviction of achieving a fair agreement,” he noted.

The post Cananea Strike Against Tycoon Germán Larrea Ends After 18 Years on the Picket Line appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

2075
 
 

This editorial by Fernando Buen Abad originally appeared in Revista Conciencas on December 15, 2025. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Media, or the Mexico Solidarity Project.**

Our diplomacy under the Fourth Transformation demands to be understood not merely as a technical exercise or a set of institutional formalities before the international community, but as a space where a profound struggle is waged over the meaning of public life, historical truth, and the emancipatory horizon of our peoples. If the 4T has fostered an ethical and political shift within the country, the pending—and increasingly urgent—task is to build a revolutionary international counterpart that breaks with neoliberal inertia, imperialist interference, far from silent obedience to organizations captured by private interests, and the reproduction of a geopolitics based on dispossession, lies, and the systemic violence of transnational capital. This alternative diplomacy cannot be limited to the reactive defense of the Mexican state, but must become an active platform for transformation, both educational and mobilizing, capable of uniting wills, articulating struggles, and producing critical thought. It is, therefore, a revolution of consciences taken to the diplomatic field, internationalist in its most fraternal sense, where every gesture, every intervention and every pronouncement becomes a seed of emancipation for Mexico and for the world.

Our revolution of consciences entails dismantling the cynicism that has become normalized in the international arena: the hypocrisy of those who speak of human rights while financing wars; the double standards of those who invoke democracy while supporting soft coups or persecuting popular leaders; the technocratic façade that hides corporate interests behind the neutral language of “cooperation” or “stability.” To confront this scenario, transformative diplomacy must recognize that truth is a political weapon: not to impose dogmas, but to unmask structures of domination, expose historical inequalities, and reaffirm the right of peoples to sovereignty and self-determination. Truth—as a critical tool—cannot be merely decorative; it must be challenging, mobilizing, capable of breaking complicit silences and generating new balances of power. This begins with updating it constitutionally.

This diplomacy of truth is inconceivable without the active participation of the people. The old diplomatic model operated like an elitist club of expert merchants isolated from the people, trained not to feel or listen, to feign neutrality in the face of human suffering. The diplomacy of the Fourth Transformation, on the contrary, must be nourished by the moral energy of social movements, by communal wisdom, by the history of struggles that Mexico has offered to the world: from Cardenismo to Zapatismo, from the defense of oil to the hospitality shown to political refugees. The revolution of consciousness demands that foreign policy cease to be a matter for elites and become a collective educational process, where society participates, evaluates, demands, and proposes. This is not about “popular” diplomacy as a mere slogan, but about a real process of transformation, where the people are the subject and not the spectator.

Transformative diplomacy must recognize that truth is a political weapon: not to impose dogmas, but to unmask structures of domination, expose historical inequalities, and reaffirm the right of peoples to sovereignty and self-determination.

A new revolutionary program of diplomacy requires cultivating its own critical theory, free from colonial complexes and epistemological subordinations. Mexico can no longer import foreign conceptual frameworks to interpret its own reality or to integrate itself into the world. The revolution of consciousness needs diplomatic thought that draws from the Latin American tradition of sovereignty, from practices of solidarity-based integration, from experiences of anti-imperialist resistance, and from the intellectual legacy of figures such as Martí, Bolívar, Mariátegui, González Casanova, and Freire. Revolutionary diplomacy is not voluntaristic improvisation; it is rigorous theory, articulated praxis, and a dialectical reading of the international situation. It requires recovering the critique of communication, media warfare, lawfare , and the corporate and financial diplomacy that today de facto replaces classical international politics. Without a profound understanding of these dimensions, no transformation is possible.

In this context, communication occupies a strategic place. Transformative diplomacy must contest the construction of global common sense. It is not enough to defend Mexico’s image against media campaigns; it is essential to create our own platforms, alternative information networks, and grassroots communication networks that challenge the informational hegemony of capital. The revolution of consciousness in diplomacy implies transforming embassies and consulates into centers of media literacy, spaces for critical research, and hubs of internationalist solidarity. Information must cease to be a commodity and become a tool for emancipation. And this is not about government propaganda: it is about producing collective knowledge, documenting struggles, making injustices visible, supporting emancipatory processes in other countries, and weaving a continental network of critical communication.

Another essential element is the recovery of the principle of internationalist fraternity. Mexico, which has historically offered asylum to political refugees, can once again become a global leader in active solidarity. The revolution of conscience demands abandoning the fear of diplomatic conflict when human dignity is at stake. Foreign policy cannot be timid or complicit in the face of economic blockades that kill entire populations, covert military interventions, or campaigns of lies that justify aggression. A revolutionary diplomacy not only condemns these practices: it organizes, convenes, mobilizes, and coordinates global efforts for peace with justice. It is not about confrontation for the sake of confrontation, but about exercising ethical firmness that inspires respect even among those who do not share the transformative project. A diplomacy of moral fortitude is more powerful than a diplomacy of tactical expediency.

Diplomacy cannot be transformed with officials trained in the old paradigm, accustomed to bureaucratic obedience and empty rhetoric. A new diplomatic school is required, based on ethics, critical thinking, communication theory, political economy, Latin American history, media analysis, political philosophy, and emancipatory pedagogy.

The entire field of international political economy is one where a revolution of consciousness must intervene. Mexico cannot limit itself to negotiating trade agreements under the logic of the free market. A radical rethinking of the notion of international cooperation is required, moving toward a model that prioritizes food, energy, technological, and communications sovereignty. Agreements must be geared toward building regional value chains, protecting natural resources as common goods, regulating speculative capital, and defending decent work. Transformative diplomacy does not bow to financial ratings or the blackmail of private interests disguised as multilateral organizations. An economic internationalism is needed that puts life above profit and builds alternatives to predatory extractivism.

Our revolution of consciousness in diplomacy also demands a radical critique of cultural colonialism. The international system has imposed its linguistic hierarchies, its forms of knowledge, its political trends, and its rituals of authority. Mexico must reclaim its linguistic plurality, its Indigenous worldview, and its history of resistance—not as folklore, but as a living contribution to a world that needs new forms of relationship, new ontologies and epistemologies that transcend the predatory logic of capitalism. Transformative diplomacy can learn from Indigenous communities practices of dialogue, care, balance with nature, and collective conflict resolution. This knowledge is not “alternative”: it is indispensable for confronting the global civilizational crisis.

José Carlos Mariátegui

In this revolutionary task, the training of diplomatic cadres is crucial. Diplomacy cannot be transformed with officials trained in the old paradigm, accustomed to bureaucratic obedience and empty rhetoric. A new diplomatic school is required, based on ethics, critical thinking, communication theory, political economy, Latin American history, media analysis, political philosophy, and emancipatory pedagogy. The revolution of consciousness must translate into curricula that train diplomats capable of engaging in dialogue with the people, not just elites; capable of reading a trade agreement and interpreting a balance of power; capable of speaking indigenous languages ​​as well as technical jargon; and capable of articulating historical memory with geopolitical strategy. A revolutionary diplomacy needs organic intellectuals, not technocrats.

Thus, a revolutionary program of diplomacy must be geared toward building a new international architecture based on justice, genuine cooperation, and the democracy of the people. It is not enough to criticize the neoliberal order: it is necessary to propose new institutions, new forms of regional integration, new mechanisms for dispute resolution, and new platforms for scientific and technological cooperation. Mexico can play a central role in creating a Latin American community of public communication, in establishing a regional agency for strategic research, in founding a continental mechanism for humanitarian solidarity, and in promoting an alliance for energy sovereignty. The revolution of consciousness is not a slogan: it is the conviction that another world is possible, but also the responsibility to build it with rigor, discipline, and political imagination.

A diplomacy of the Fourth Transformation—if it truly aspires to be transformative—must break down the symbolic barriers that limit critical thinking, challenge the powers that profit from ignorance and disengagement, and embrace communication as a battleground and solidarity as its guiding principle. The revolution of consciousness is, ultimately, a collective process of emancipation that demands courage, political clarity, and an uncompromising ethic. Mexico has a historic opportunity to demonstrate that diplomacy can also be a revolution: a peaceful, profound, humanist, and radically democratic revolution. A revolution waged not with weapons, but with ideas, truth, organization, and the moral strength of peoples who are no longer willing to accept a world based on lies, exploitation, and dispossession. A revolution that sows hope, raises awareness, and paves the way for a more just humanity.

The post Towards a Revolution of Consciousness in 4th Transformation Diplomacy appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›