1251
Latin American Publications!
123 readers
27 users here now
A community for Latin American publications.
NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
1252
1253
1254
1255
This article by Miguel Ángel Velázquez originally appeared in the January 19, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. The views expressed in this article are the authors’* own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project.*
Last week, we were talking with you about the Trump administration’s intentions toward our country, and we warned that an invasion seemed like a very distant possibility, but not impossible, because anything can happen in the mind of Agent Orange. But what is on the table for discussion, we can now confirm, is the intervention of one of that country’s agencies in our national territory under the pretext of the fight against drugs.
Days later, at the end of last week, The New York Times informed us that pressure on Mexico to allow agents into our territory has increased and the threats are becoming more forceful every day.
According to the newspaper, which confirms our suspicions, agencies like the CIA are ready to “accompany” national operations with their personnel, but does Trump really want to combat drug trafficking, or is his intention to manage and even manipulate certain aspects of national life? The latter seems to be his intention.
Under both Calderón and Peña Nieto, DEA agents ran drug trafficking operations with impunity, without notifying Mexican authorities and always politicizing the illicit activities they orchestrated. Meanwhile, drugs flowed freely and with impunity over Mexico.
DEA agents, CIA spies, hawkish diplomats, a whole network that intends to work on Mexico so that the country’s political affairs are shaped from Washington, where the discrediting – undermining work of that same network – of those who govern and those who make laws is of such magnitude that only the word of the gringo agencies can give meaning to daily life.
An example of how attempts were made to discredit the country’s political work occurred in the first decade of this century, when Andrés Manuel López Obrador was accused—the DEA opened a case on the matter—of having financed his campaign with drug money. They were never able to produce any evidence to support this claim.
During the Calderón and Peña administrations, DEA agents increased their presence in the country – from 54 to 70, and the supposed “administrative technicians” also grew in size, from 32 to 41 –; in total, a large group that had the help of those in our country who collaborate with them regardless of the betrayal.
Regaining control not only of drug trafficking but also of the most significant events in the country’s political life is surely part of the plan Trump seeks to impose in Mexico, and to that end he pressures, threatens and blackmails, something that is understood in the Zócalo.
The biggest problem is that –as it is known throughout the world– the current President of the United States is capable of pressing the button at any moment, unless from within, from the streets, cities and towns of that country, we insist the monster that can press the button is stopped.
For now, a coalition of unions and community organizations in Minneapolis and St. Paul have called for a general strike on Friday the 23rd, a movement they have dubbed “a day of truth and freedom” in which, they affirm, “we will not go to work, school, or shop; we will block everything.” The movement could become the resistance many are hoping for. Let’s hope it’s the beginning of the end.
-
Trump’s Pressure on Mexico & The Drugs Pretext
January 19, 2026January 19, 2026
Agencies like the CIA are ready to “accompany” Mexican operations, but does Trump really want to combat drug trafficking, or is his intention to manage & manipulate Mexico?
-
Clicks
January 17, 2026January 17, 2026
Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including a world without the USMCA or the death of Mexican agriculture, Indigenous rights, and the lingering threat of US military aggression against Mexico.
-
University & Intervention
January 17, 2026January 17, 2026
Our country cannot repeat the mistakes of the past, such as when Latin American unity was rejected or when it disregarded Cuban and Venezuela initiatives to connect with labor and educational forces, along with their proposals and warnings.
The post Trump’s Pressure on Mexico & The Drugs Pretext appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.
From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.
1256
1257
1258
2
After the Bombs: Venezuelans Concerned About a Future of Coercion and Colonization
(venezuelanalysis.com)
CARACAS, Venezuela — It was 1:58 a.m. on Jan. 3 when a thunderous roar made the windows of my apartment in downtown Caracas shake. Are the New Year’s celebrations still going on? Is a storm coming or is it an earthquake, I wondered. Despite multiple threats from the United States against Venezuela, I couldn’t believe that bombing was possible; not like this, not now. As people say in Venezuela, “It’s one thing to call on the devil, and another to see him actually arrive.” As the missiles began to fall one after another, my phone was inundated with the same message: “They are bombing us.”
Residents in the southwest of the city witnessed at least 11 helicopters entering Fort Tiuna, Caracas’ most important military complex, which is surrounded by dozens of civilian buildings jointly known as Tiuna City. Andrea Pérez, a resident of the area, heard the roar of the helicopters, followed by high-pitched whistles that ended in a massive explosion. The glare lit up her apartment, and the dense air tightened in her young son’s chest.
“We ran down eight floors, using our phone flashlights and we bumped into all our neighbors. Some were half-naked, running for their lives. Some of us got into our cars, but the traffic was so bad it took nearly 20 minutes just to get out of there,” she tells Truthdig.
People in the residential complex of Tiuna City around Fort Tiuna in Caracas were forced to evacuate as bombs fell on Jan. 3. (Jessica Dos Santos Jardim)
Within minutes, the highway filled with people trying to flee on foot from whatever was happening. “There was no light. You could hear indescribable, terrifying noises. You didn’t know where they were coming from. We had no idea what was happening outside, but we had to get out. I carried my dog, which weighs almost 30 kilos and just had surgery,” Oleno León, another resident, says.
Later, we learned that a U.S. cyberattack had crippled a large part of Caracas’ power supply. This helped enable 150 stealth fighters, electronic warfare aircraft, bombers, assault helicopters, drones and intelligence satellites to penetrate the skies of at least four Venezuelan states.
Negotiation and betrayal: Does it matter?
Hours later, we knew there had been an incursion, but we weren’t certain if the objective — to abduct President Nicolás Maduro — had been achieved. However, later in the morning, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez established a phone link with the state television channel and confirmed the situation by asking the U.S. for “proof of life” for the president and his wife, Cilia Flores.
People hunkered down. The streets turned into deserts. A harsh quietness descended that was only broken the next day by desperate lines at supermarkets, pharmacies and shops selling drinking water. What followed is now well known: multiple and contradictory statements from various U.S. government officials, images of Maduro and Flores arriving at the Drug Enforcement Administration office and later the courthouse in Manhattan, and Rodríguez being sworn in as acting president in the National Assembly.
However, as the days passed, people had questions: What happened to the Russian air defense systems or the Chinese radar for detecting air attacks — including the 5,000 Igla-S missiles that Maduro himself claimed to have in October 2025? Why were there no air-to-air battles? Did everything fail? Would this amount to treason? Or, if it was a negotiation, was the now-kidnapped president involved or not?
The picture became somewhat clearer when the United States government explained how its high-level technology managed to dismantle Venezuelan defenses, as well as the role played for months by several undercover CIA agents in Caracas. Rodríguez stated that “no one surrendered” and that “there was combat here.” The lives of at least 100 people “were taken in a vile, unequal, unilateral, illegal and illegitimate attack,” she said.
Maduro’s son, National Assembly member Nicolás Maduro Guerra, also stated that the U.S. neutralized the radar used for detection. “We were left blind; they attacked us with an aircraft that emits an electromagnetic wave that affects all defense systems,” he said. “It was impossible to get a plane off the ground, and most likely, if we had taken off, they would have shot it down. The technology they used was impressive. I believe this was a rehearsal for something bigger, and humanity should know about it.”
However, days earlier, Maduro Guerra had also hinted at the possibility of treason within the government. In statements to Truthdig, historian and Caracas-based commentator Álvaro Suzzarini notes that in catastrophes of this scale, the responses and actions of those under attack will inevitably range from betrayal and compromise to acts of heroism. However, he says, beyond the sensationalism and debates in the media and public generated by that dynamic, history will eventually reveal what role the key figures ultimately played.
Central University of Venezuela social psychology and criminology professor Andrés Antillano tells Truthdig that speculation doesn’t help while the situation is still so volatile. “The fact is that there is a negotiation with Trump; whether it happened before or after the military intervention and Maduro’s kidnapping is a matter of speculation, and perhaps it is not the most relevant issue right now,” Antillano says. “What matters more is understanding what comes after this brutal and ruthless intervention, which also served to intimidate the entire continent.”
Venezuelans worry about US role and economy
“I worry about losing power again or running out of water. Luckily, I have some food at home, but I also fear not being able to find what I need. I am also worried about safety, about the emptiness that takes over the streets at night and what that could lead to,” says Ariadna García, a young writer. She, like other Venezuelans I spoke with, isn’t sure what the role and reach of the U.S. in Venezuela will ultimately be.
Rodríguez has stated that the country “was attacked by a nuclear power but is not at war,” that “no external agent governs it,” and that it is entering “a new political moment” — one that has already included meetings with opposition lawmakers and the release of political prisoners.
But for citizens like university professor María Mercedes Cobo, national and personal fears have emerged. “First of all, I fear this aggression could be repeated, but I’m also terrified that we may no longer be a country with self-determination, and instead a colonized territory. Every time Trump speaks as if he were the president of Venezuela, it scares me. But I also wonder what will happen to our economy,” she tells Truthdig.
In the first week of January, the official exchange rate for the U.S. dollar against the Venezuelan bolívar rose by almost 10% , while the gap between the official and parallel rates is around 100%. This devaluing of the bolívar — through which most workers receive their income — reduces purchasing power, which was already very low. As of the end of last year, the monthly minimum wage in Venezuela was less than one U.S. dollar, and most income was received as bonuses.
Since Jan. 3, “In a context of deep political uncertainty, the economy has stopped being a priority. The failure to address this gap is causing a contraction in people’s purchasing power due to the breakdown of the pricing system,” economist Asdrúbal Oliveros tells Truthdig. He says that until the Venezuelan oil market stabilizes, the exchange rate will not stabilize either.
Venezuelan experts on the future
In purely political terms, what could happen in the coming months? According to Suzzarini, predicting outcomes with limited data under conditions of high uncertainty is risky, but he believes the emerging and most plausible scenario is the current one. “The continuity of Chavismo in power under the figure of Delcy Rodríguez, with at least the current 2025-2031 presidential term being fulfilled,” he says.
In his view, Venezuela is experiencing a “transition without transition,” where the U.S. has removed the president, but the governing party is the same, a sign that Washington did not and does not fully understand the phenomenon of Chavismo — the ideology embraced by followers of the late President Hugo Chávez — as a political movement. “This is not the kind of government, as calculated in the United States, where decapitating Maduro’s leadership would cause everything else to collapse,” he says.
“There are multiple converging leaderships and a political maturity of 30 years,” he says, referring to the decades of Bolivarian revolution and related organizing and movements.
The historian also points out that the right-wing opposition, led by María Corina Machado, will likely remain “outside the equation and the mathematics of power” because it lacks the capacity or support to sustain it, especially in such a delicate moment. Meanwhile, he says, Russia and China could still shift the global political landscape, with repercussions for Venezuela.
Public transportation, trash collection and other basic services have now largely returned to normal in Caracas. (Jessica Dos Santos Jardim)
Trump is willing to receive Machado at the White House and she would like to award him her Nobel Peace Prize, but both know that the opposition leader could not run the country — especially not now. “She lacks the support and the respect,” Trump stated on Jan. 3.
However, the country is still essentially being held hostage by the U.S. and is under constant threat, Carlos Raúl Hernández, a political science professor at the Central University of Venezuela, explains. He says this makes acting President Rodríguez a sort of lifeline.
“Venezuela has a somewhat similar population and geographic size to Iraq [when it was bombed in 2003], so if the United States decided today to proceed with an invasion, it could … cause the deaths of 40,000 Venezuelans. It’s an extremely grave threat, one that must be avoided through agreements,” Hernández tells Truthdig.
To Hernández, Rodríguez is in a difficult position because, “theoretically or practically, the oil fleet linked to Venezuela has been seized, and of course that leaves no alternative but to negotiate. The tankers are in U.S. hands, so moving the oil requires U.S. approval. Another factor is China’s oil exploitation, which is also very important for the Venezuelan nation at this moment, as it represents 70% of exports. On the other hand, the United States is a key importer for China, and China is a major market for the United States.”
However, he believes that Rodríguez’s government could last a couple of years before new elections are held, “Until there is no longer a risk of confrontation, civil war or a process that destabilizes the world’s largest international oil reserve. Trump is interested in making sure this gigantic mine operates without setbacks, and that’s why he negotiates with the Chavista government — because it’s the only force with a real structure and control of the state apparatus.”
Hernández also thinks that if these agreements break down, new forms of invasion could follow. “But predicting it is difficult because everything that is taking place is unprecedented — astonishing in a civilized world like the one we thought we had.”
It would not be the first time a U.S. government chose to invade first and think later. But, at least for now, it seems that U.S. action will focus on coercing authorities through measures like those we experienced on Jan. 3.
Democratic U.S. senators, along with a small bloc of Republican senators, delivered a rebuke to Trump by voting in favor of advancing a resolution that would limit the future use of U.S. military force in Venezuela without congressional approval, but the resolution failed after two Republicans changed their votes and Vice President JD Vance voted to break a tie. Either way, Trump rarely respects U.S. legality, and he still has three years left in his term. Meanwhile, his next target could be Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Greenland … or once again, Venezuela.
The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Venezuelanalysis editorial staff.
Source: Truthdig
The post After the Bombs: Venezuelans Concerned About a Future of Coercion and Colonization appeared first on Venezuelanalysis.
From Venezuelanalysis via This RSS Feed.
1259
1260
1261
1262
2
María Corina Machado Criticized for Servility for Handing Over Her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump
(orinocotribune.com)
The gesture of servility by Venezuelan far-right leader María Corina Machado, presenting US President Donald Trump with her Nobel Peace Prize, drew criticism from media outlets in Norway, the country that awarded her the distinction.
“Pathetic.” “Unheard of.” “Ridiculous.” These are some of the adjectives that appeared on Friday, January 16, in Norway’s main media outlets.
Criticism did not come only from Norway but also from various parts of the world—where the news was initially met with derision. Political and social leaders, as well as figures from the art world and academia from around the world, joined in criticizing Machado’s action.
Ignasi Guardans, Catalan MP and director general of the Institute of Cinematography and Audiovisual Arts of Spain, called it “ridiculous, embarrassing, and humiliating.”
A Chilean internet user, ReneX, wrote: “The presentation of the Nobel Peace Prize medal by María Corina Machado to Donald Trump is neither a diplomatic act, nor a strategic move, nor a symbol of moral integrity. It is, plain and simple, an act of vassalage.”
EL NOBEL COMO OFRENDA
Breve manual de la humillación voluntaria.
Hay gestos políticos que no necesitan análisis: se explican solos. La entrega de la medalla del Premio Nobel de la Paz por parte de María Corina Machado a Donald Trump no es un acto diplomático, ni una jugada… pic.twitter.com/6WniLsmczL
— ReneX (@Eneatipo7) January 17, 2026
Criticism of Trump
It was not only Machado who drew criticism and ridicule; the incident did not go unnoticed by the opposition in the United States, a country is currently facing the ICE (immigration) crackdown ordered by the Trump administration.
Maintream media outlet CNN published the criticisms from some leaders and commentators: “Trump’s insatiable thirst for recognition led him to accept a newly invented ‘FIFA Peace Award,’ which was evidently created to curry his favor after he failed to win his coveted Nobel Prize.”
The situation is embarrassing, since, as the article points out, Machado handed over her award to someone who has already publicly denied his support for installing her as president of a de facto government in Venezuela.
“The other way to interpret this situation is that, irrespective of the pressure, Machado used the medal as a bargaining chip. It is hard to blame her for using it as leverage, given how important it is to her and her country,” the CNN article reflected.
“But this dynamic also underscores the real risks of Trump’s emphasis on flattery. And it raises the possibility that decisions as serious as ousting a foreign leader and shaping that country’s future could be made, at least in part, based on personal praise,” the article added.
International Academic Statement Against US Bombing of Venezuela and Kidnapping of President Maduro
Criticism with humor
Cartoonists and memers around the world have seized on the event to question the act through political satire, in a context where the two epoliticians, Trump and Machado, have militarily attacked Venezuela—one by carrying out the attack, the other by pleading for it.
In addition to the fact that the act of handing over the prize itself is already shameful, it is impossible not to take into account the context in which it has taken place, as that frivolous award ceremony—paradoxically dubbed a “peace” prize—is drenched with the blood of many of María Corina Machado’s compatriots during the January 3rd US military attack on Venezuela.
(Telesur)
Translation: Orinoco Tribune
OT/SC/DZ
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275