101
Latin American Publications!
123 readers
98 users here now
A community for Latin American publications.
NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
This column by Carlos Fernández-Vega originally appeared in the February 10, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. The views expressed in this article are the authors’* own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project.*
In his first year in office, then-President López Obrador announced that no new mining concessions would be granted, “because what was given (to local and foreign consortiums in the sector) was excessive, and if we analyze it, we will conclude that not even in a thousand generations would the 108 million hectares (equivalent to 54 percent of the national territory) that were handed out” by the PRI-PAN governments be fully exploited. That was in August 2019, and seven years later, Claudia Sheinbaum reaffirmed that no new concessions would be granted and that, in fact, more than 200 completely unproductive concessions would revert to the Mexican State.
The President explained that although the federal government made the respective request, the mining consortiums that held the mines among their assets “agreed (to return them) voluntarily” and, in case there was any doubt, she made it clear that “we will not change that policy; there are, now, groups that say that ‘we are going to enter an extractive process and we are handing over the natural resources’; none of that is true.”
It seems someone has finally grasped the significance of the message sent years ago by the national leader of the Mining Union, Napoleón Gómez Urrutia: “The granting of concessions to extract resources has been characterized by a particular phenomenon: complicity. In exchange for political and financial support, politicians betray the Constitution and grant favorable concessions to private companies and a select few individuals. In addition to signing unlimited permits to exploit natural resources, government officials grant tax exemptions, authorizations to dump toxic waste, and force the displacement of Indigenous communities. The companies have become monopolies that work to generate profits at any cost. Meanwhile, health and safety issues are completely ignored. All of this happens with the backing of politicians, who continue to grant more concessions to abusive companies.”
Indeed, if there is one thing that characterizes mining in Mexico, it is the concentration of concessions granted to private capital (Germán Larrea, the Bailleres family, Carlos Slim, Canadian consortiums and a few others), of the land (they are the neo-latifundistas) and of the hundreds of billions of dollars that this activity generates annually, without much benefit for the country.
President Sheinbaum’s announcement is all the more necessary given the cheerful assertion by Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard (head of the institution that grants these concessions) that “we signed an action plan with the United States, which involves mutual consultations and anticipates that within 60 days we will present different alternatives regarding critical minerals,” while also announcing that Mexico “will hold talks with other nations to sign an action plan on critical minerals similar to the one signed with the United States” (La Jornada, Braulio Carbajal). However, the president was very clear: “absolutely nothing has been signed,” a point that must be emphasized because the insatiable American predators have their eyes on the country’s mineral wealth.
To give an idea of the sheer volume of mining concessions granted by the neoliberal regime, it’s worth noting that the area is equivalent to the combined territory of 11 Mexican states, 3.8 times the size of Central America, 2.8 times the size of Texas, or the combined area of Spain and France. Felipe Calderón takes the gold medal with 36 million hectares; Ernesto Zedillo the silver with 35 million; and Vicente Fox the bronze with just over 27 million (Peña Nieto, 8 million; and Salinas de Gortari, 2.2 million).
The government must be very cautious, because the neoliberal regime handed out mining concessions to its predatory cronies like candy, so that more than half of the national territory ended up in their hands in one way or another. Given this situation, it’s worth remembering: large-scale mining accounts for 77 percent of national production; medium-sized mining, 7 percent; and small-scale mining, 16 percent. As of mid-2025, 22,247 concessions remained in effect, and nearly 451,000 hectares of land were recovered through the cancellation of 344 permits for non-compliance. Of the total concessions still in effect, 56 percent are concentrated in four states: Sonora, Durango, Chihuahua, and Zacatecas.
-
Predation & Neo-latifundismo
February 10, 2026
The government must be very cautious, as the neoliberal regime handed out mining concessions to its predatory cronies like candy, more than half of the national territory ended up in their hands in one way or another.
-
People’s Mañanera February 9
February 9, 2026
President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on scholarships, return of mining concessions, PRIAN exposed, Bad Bunny Super Bowl, and aid to Cuba.
-
8 Million App Users, TV Soap Opera Ad… & the PAN Still Can’t Find New Members
February 9, 2026February 9, 2026
In Mexico, where political parties are currently publicly financed, the right wing PAN has spent a staggering amount during its lackluster recruitment drive.
The post Predation & Neo-latifundismo appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.
From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
2
Filton Acquittals Demolish Starmer and Cooper Lies About Palestine Action 117
(orinocotribune.com)
By Craig Murray – Feb 5, 2026
As the trial finished at Woolwich Crown Court of the six Palestine Action activists who entered the Filton factory to destroy Israeli killer drones, Starmer, Cooper, Lammy and Mahmood are left bereft of a single guilty verdict in the case on which they relied heavily to label Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.
I could not, on pain of imprisonment, tell you this during the trial. One item produced by the prosecution as evidence was the notebook of Charlotte Head, on which she had written details from her training session with Palestine Action and of the proposed direct action against Elbit’s drone factory.
The first ten pages of her notes were about the Israeli weapons company Elbit, their footprint in the UK, their corporate structure and the weapons they manufacture, and the evidence of the use of their weaponry in the genocide in Gaza.
The jury were shown the notebook but were specifically not allowed to see the first ten pages. Throughout the trial anything that referred to the crimes of Elbit, their role in the mass killing and mutilation of women and children, and their cosy relationship with the British government, was excluded from the jury. The judge continually stopped the defence lawyers from asking or saying anything about who Elbit are or why their property was being attacked.
The defendants were not permitted therefore to explain to the jury why they did what they did – which you might have believed was a pretty fundamental right. The jury were additionally, in effect, instructed by Judge Johnson to convict on the least serious charge, that of criminal damage.
But despite the state taking every possible precaution to ensure that the state got its convictions in this show trial, the jury refused to find that trying to stop Genocide is a crime.
This trial was fundamental to the government’s argument that Palestine Action is a terrorist organisation. And the key to that was the accusation that Palestine Action from the start intended harm to people, not just to property. That is why these defendants were all charged with “aggravated burglary”.
Aggravated burglary is an extremely serious charge, carrying a potential life sentence. It is the offence of breaking into a property with the intent to use a weapon. On aggravated burglary, all six defendants were found resoundingly Not Guilty.
So the attempt to portray Palestine Action as an organisation involved in violence against persons has fallen flat on its face. Because the jury could see it was stupid and obviously untrue.
When it comes to events after the activists were attacked by security guards, three of the six were found not guilty of the charge of “violent disorder”. On three others the jury could not reach a verdict.
Most interesting of all perhaps was the charge of criminal damage to Elbit’s machinery and instruments of genocide. Here Judge Johnson to all intents and purposes had instructed the jury to convict. Yet enough of the jury could not accept that stopping Genocide is a crime.
The final question was the charge against Samuel Corner of Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent. This was the famous incident where the security guards attacked the defendants with weapons and there was a melee as they defended themselves.
It is worth stating that the tabloid stories and right-wing meme of “a policewoman’s spine was fractured” was always utter nonsense. As the defence closing speech stated:
The prosecution have said it was a fracture to the spine, a deliberate choice of words which although technically accurate, conjure up a break, a snapping of the spinal vertebrae. Maybe that’s what the jury had in mind until they saw the CT scan – it was actually an injury that wasn’t obvious. The doctors looking at the first X-rays didn’t identify any bone damage, nor in an MRI later.
The injury didn’t require surgery and Sergeant Evans was advised to take painkillers and do physiotherapy. The agreed facts state from medical evidence that you’d expect such a fracture to heal in six to twelve weeks, with full healing in three to six months, and no long-term consequences.
The unfortunate policewoman suffered no damage at all to her spinal cord. She had a possible hairline fracture to the wing of one vertebra. That there was any fracture at all was never definitive from the X-rays and MRIs. Whether it reached the bar of grievous bodily harm was disputed; how it was caused was disputed; and whether there was any intent to harm was disputed. The refusal of the jury to convict was completely consistent with the evidence heard in court.
This has driven right-wingers into a frenzy with completely false claims about the extent of the injury, and continued reference to a highly edited brief video clip.
That video clip is extremely important because it represents the height of the state’s attempt to use this incident to demonise Palestine Action. The police were permitted, during the course of the trial, to release a single and highly edited clip of video said to represent the injury of Sergeant Evans by a sledgehammer. A great deal of other video evidence was not released. This resulted in a massive media frenzy.
British Palestine Solidarity Movement Hails ‘Monumental Victory’ as Jury Fails To Convict Activists
Even before this, Yvette Cooper and Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Mark Rowley had caused massive prejudice by stating that a policewoman had been attacked with a sledgehammer.
None of these deliberate attempts to affect the trial was censured by the judge nor resulted in any proceedings for contempt of court. Yet we were strictly told we absolutely could not mention that the judge was withholding the evidence about Elbit from the jury, as that would prejudice the trial and we would face contempt of court proceedings.
On Sergeant Evans, she has become a cause célèbre for the right, but I should say there is no evidence she is herself whipping this up. Her behaviour on the night was admirable. She was not herself involved in the excessive use of force – and, despite her own painful back, tended to others after the event quietened.
In my view, this prosecution was doomed by the overcharging and exaggeration used by the government to demonise Palestine Action. The “aggravated burglary” charge was ludicrous. To attempt to claim that the activists entered the factory with the intent of using weapons against people, went so far against the evidence it was bound to fail.
The massive over-exaggeration of the extent of Sergeant Evans’s injury has successfully whipped up right-wing hysteria, but did not really meet the threshold of grievous bodily harm, and the decision to add intent to that charge was again not backed by evidence.
On criminal damage, the jury plainly refused to accept the destruction of weapons of genocide was a crime. For that, I salute them. For the rest, they simply applied robust common sense to the evidence before them.
The “policewoman attacked with a sledgehammer” nonsense of course featured heavily in the English judicial review of the proscription of Palestine Action. In the Scottish judicial review, they cannot really use this – not without a caveat that a jury did not agree with them.
The Filton result is great news for the Scottish judicial review. We have to submit all the paperwork for that, in just seven working days. I hate to say this, but we are now desperately short of funds to continue this action. I cannot keep asking the same supporters to give more, but if you know people who can afford it and will contribute please activate them.
You can donate through the link via Crowd Justice, which goes straight to the lawyers, or through this blog.
https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/scottish-challenge-to-proscription/
From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125