Latin American Publications!

121 readers
11 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
101
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Venezuela’s Acting President Delcy Rodríguez has announced the appointment of Coromoto Godoy—formerly the minister for foreign trade—as Venezuela’s new ambassador to the United Nations in New York. Godoy will now assume the responsibility of representing Venezuela’s sovereign voice within the declining multilateral organization.

In a statement released on social media this Wednesday, March 25, Rodríguez expressed confidence in the appointment. “We trust in her experience and extensive diplomatic career to consolidate Venezuela’s presence in the United Nations System,” she explained, “defending our interests, and strengthening cooperation relations in all international spaces.”

Rodríguez also expressed gratitude to the outgoing ambassador, Samuel Moncada, who has served in the role since 2017 and is set to assume new responsibilities. Moncada is a veteran diplomat who previously served briefly as foreign minister in 2017, and as minister for university education between 2004 and 2006 during the administration of Hugo Chávez.

New leadership at the Ministry for Foreign Trade
Coromoto Godoy enters the UN role with extensive experience in the foreign service, having previously served as consul general in Miami, and as ambassador to Spain, India, and Trinidad and Tobago. Most recently she served as deputy foreign minister for Europe.

Following Godoy’s appointment, the acting president also reported that economist Johann Álvarez Márquez has been appointed as the new minister for foreign trade. Álvarez previously held the position of vice minister of international trade policy and served as the National Superintendent of Special Economic Zones (SEZ).

Rodríguez stated that Álvarez “assumes this responsibility at a stage where global trade dynamics are fundamental for the development of a productive, diversified economy, and for boosting Venezuela in international markets.”

Venezuelan Diplomats Set to Arrive In Washington This Week; New Head of Return to the Homeland Program

Moncada’s legacy of diplomatic defense
While some mainstream media outlets attempted to frame the transition as a move by Rodríguez to replace appointees of President Nicolás Maduro, analysts have highlighted that Moncada continues to be a core figure of the Chavista establishment, and a clear shortlist for an eventual Foreign Minister appointment. He is widely recognized for his unwavering loyalty to the Bolivarian Revolution across both the Chávez and Maduro administrations.

Moncada is noted for his sharp skills in challenging the narratives and rhetoric of the West on the global stage, and has consistently framed international pressure against Caracas as a neocolonial assault driven by imperialist greed for natural resources. This was most recently demonstrated in January 2026, when he forcefully condemned the illegal military bombing of Venezuela by the US empire during an emergency session of the UN Security Council, following the unprecedented January 3 US attack.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

102
 
 

El Taller, the interview series from the Soberanía podcast, is back! Hosts José Luis Granados Ceja and Kurt Hackbarth sit down with Hilary Goodfriend, a postdoctoral researcher at UNAM and longtime observer of Central American politics, for a wide-ranging conversation about the region’s distinct political trajectory.

The discussion opens with a historical overview of Central America, tracing how U.S. interventions, civil wars, and neoliberal restructuring shaped a region often viewed through a Mexican lens but with its own unique patterns of resistance and repression. From the 1954 coup in Guatemala to the negotiated peace accords of the 1990s, Goodfriend maps the political terrain that produced today’s fragmented landscape.

The conversation then turns to contemporary dynamics: the recent “Shield of the Americas” summit, the uneven rise of far-right figures like Nayib Bukele, and the electoral manipulation and judicial sabotage that have stymied progressive governments across the isthmus. The hosts and Goodfriend also discuss the role of U.S. ambassador Ron Johnson, whose low-profile presence in Mexico contrasts sharply with his previous role in El Salvador—raising questions about what’s happening behind the scenes.

Throughout, the conversation underscores the urgent need for a coordinated progressive response in the region, the lessons Mexico might draw from Central America’s recent history, and the strategic leverage Mexico holds—if it chooses to use it.


The post El Taller: Central America: Ground Zero for Empire with Hilary Goodfriend appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

103
 
 

The decision coincides with continued joint operations between the IRGC and Hezbollah, and comes after Gulf states took similar action against Iranian diplomatic staff

The Lebanese government has decided to withdraw its approval for the accreditation of Iran’s ambassador to the country, Mohammad Reza Sheibani, declaring him “persona non grata” and giving him until next Sunday to leave Lebanon.

In a statement on 24 March, the Lebanese Foreign Ministry announced that it summoned the ambassador and informed him of “the Lebanese state’s decision to withdraw approval of the accreditation of the appointed Iranian ambassador, Mohammad Reza Sheibani, and declare him persona non grata, demanding that he leave Lebanese territory no later than next Sunday.”

The decision came due to what Beirut described as Tehran’s “violation of diplomatic norms and established practices between the two countries.”

The Lebanese Foreign Ministry later said that its decision does not constitute a severing of diplomatic relations, but rather a protest against the ambassador’s “violation” of protocols, without specifying further.

According to Saudi news outlet Al-Hadath, Hezbollah and its ally, the Amal Movement, told the Iranian ambassador to reject the Lebanese Foreign Ministry’s decision.

Just days ago, Lebanon’s Prime Minister Nawaf Salam accused Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of “managing” Hezbollah’s military operations.

Western Silence Allows Israel To Get Away With Killing Journalists

Over the past year and a half, Lebanon’s government has used increasingly charged rhetoric against the Islamic Republic, under heavy pressure on Beirut regarding Hezbollah and its weapons.

The Lebanese resistance and the IRGC have been carrying out joint rocket and missile operations since Hezbollah joined the war on 2 March, responding to over a year of Israeli ceasefire violations following the assassination of Ali Khamenei.

Over 1,030 people have been killed by Israel in Lebanon, and over 1,500 in Iran, including at least 200 children, since the war began.

As a result of Tehran’s retaliation against US military bases being hosted by neighboring Gulf states, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have also ordered the expulsion of Iranian diplomatic staff.

After Iran responded to US-Israeli attacks on the South Pars Gas Field by hitting the US-linked Ras Laffan Refinery, Qatar expelled Iran’s military and security attaches.

Saudi Arabia also followed suit over the weekend, calling Iran’s military operations “a flagrant violation of all relevant international conventions, the principles of good neighborliness, and respect for state sovereignty.”

(The Cradle)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

104
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Missing persons/forced disappearances: truth, data, and state actionPresident Claudia Sheinbaum presented a report on the search for missing persons. Since 2018, the registry totals 394,645 cases (dating back to 1952). Of these, 262,111 persons have been located, 96% with no link to a crime, challenging alarmist narratives. Currently, there are more than 132,000 people still missing, of whom 130,178 correspond to the period after 2006, an era marked by a failed security strategy.

The phenomenon is tied to two stages: the “Dirty War” (1950s–90s) and the violence since 2006. In response to this legacy, the government is promoting scientific methodologies, data analysis, and the obligation to investigate every case, breaking with historical impunity.

Technology, the State, and justice in actionThe Mexican government highlighted a combination of technology and institutional action. This includes a Single Identity Platform, a forensic database, new teams, and a National Alert system that activates 512 institutions to speed up searches. At the same time, the State’s role is being strengthened (100 specialists, new protocols, and a commissioner), with ongoing collaboration with civil society groups and efforts to prevent youth being recruited by organized crime.

Search efforts in the Caribbean: tracking vessels with humanitarian aidPresident Sheinbaum reported that the Navy continues searching for two Mexican vessels carrying humanitarian aid to Cuba after losing contact. She explained that the Navy had been tracking three vessels, one of which has already arrived in Cuba, while operations continue in order to locate the other two.

Firm sovereignty: no intervention and territorial controlThe President clarified that the crossing of U.S. military personnel into Mexico in Nogales was minimal—just a few meters—unintentional, and that they withdrew immediately after notification, ruling out any violation or intervention in national territory.


The post People’s Mañanera March 27 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

105
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Democracy without privileges: substance vs. politickingPresident Claudia Sheinbaum called for awaiting the vote on the “Plan B” Electoral Reform in the Senate, making it clear that the goal is to eradicate privileges and strengthen participatory democracy. She emphasized that, while the Fourth Transformation (4T) seeks to eliminate privileges, the opposition maintains a systematic rejection of such proposals.

Wellbeing becoming a rightIn Sinaloa, the “Housing for Wellbeing” program expanded its goal to build and distribute over 56,000 homes, with an investment of 33.73 billion pesos (US$1.89 billion), benefiting more than 202,000 people. Through the Infonavit housing agency, there are 15,000 homes under construction, solidifying housing as a social right.

Popular support and government consolidationSheinbaum thanked the people for their trust, as she ranks first among presidents in Latin America with approval ratings around 70%. The President noted that this support is based on a stage of consolidation of the 4T, driven by infrastructure development, strengthening of Wellbeing programs, and progress in building and equipping hospitals, schools, high schools, and rural roads.

Protection for migrants: Active state role and dignified defenseThe “My Consulate” consular network is being strengthened, with 24/7 assistance, processing over 6 million paperwork procedures. Following the detention of 177,192 Mexican migrants in the United States, 12,866 visits have been conducted, along with more than 20,000 legal consultations and assistance to over 152,000 Mexican nationals.

Following the death of 13 Mexican nationals in custody or during operations —incidents characterized as unacceptable— legal claims, lawsuits, and support are being provided, in addition to demanding investigations by U.S. authorities and respect for human rights.

Lie Detector• It is not true that there was a fire inside the “Dos Bocas” refinery as a result of a terrorist attack.
• It is not true that under the “Plan B” electoral reform, President Sheinbaum “will be able to campaign in favor of Morena.”
• It is not true that the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) suspended electrical service in the Cancun hotel zone due to the Banking Convention.
• A video showing mistreatment and deficiencies at an IMSS-Bienestar medical unit in Campeche is fake.
• It is not true that under the Valeria Law, “it is illegal to speak to a woman” and to establish any type of contact.
• It is not true that under the Valeria Law, “simply by looking at a woman, you will be sent to prison.”
• It is not true that under the “Valeria Law,” “involuntary brushing up against a woman” or “a misunderstanding” can automatically land you in prison.


  • People’s Mañanera March 25

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera March 25

    March 25, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on Plan B electoral reform, Housing for Wellbeing and housing as a social right, polls, and consular protection for Mexican migrants in the US.

  • Ecocidal Militarism

    Analysis

    Ecocidal Militarism

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    If citizens in Western democracies were asked whether their militaries should build public infrastructure instead of waging war, they would almost certainly choose the latter. Abby Martin’s newest film “The Greatest Enemy of the Earth,” documents the environmental cost of the American empire.

  • UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    Labor | News Briefs

    UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    The US-based autoworkers union called for immediate protection for Tornel workers and their families, as well as a public condemnation of the attack by Mexican authorities and industry leaders.

The post People’s Mañanera March 25 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

106
 
 

This article by Étienne von Bertrab originally appeared at Diario Red on March 17, 2026 and has been translated and republished with the permission of the author. We encourage you to follow Étienne at @etiennista.

Author’s note: Here is information on how to screen Earth’s Greatest Enemy in theaters or universities (although it seems that for now the effort is focused on the United States); it is expected to be available on streaming platforms by May.

As a Mexican, I’m amazed when people in Europe express concern about ‘militarism’ in Mexico or the alleged ecocide of the Maya Train. Indeed, both militarism and ecocide form a recurring narrative used by the opposition in Mexico, a story that has been effectively disseminated in international media. Let’s break it down a bit.

On the one hand, we, the awakened Mexicans, know that since 2018 the growing role of the armed forces, which led to a larger budget for the Ministry of National Defense (SEDENA) , has nothing to do with the acquisition of weapons for war, with facilitating the repression of social movements or undermining the right to protest.

The environmental impact of the construction of the Maya Train in Mexico pales in comparison to the numerous ecocides that local communities have witnessed over the years.

In contrast, in addition to performing security functions, the Mexican armed forces, during the Fourth Transformation, have built airports and railways (such as the Maya Train), modernized ports, created the Banco del Bienestar (Welfare Bank) network that allows the disbursement of funds from social programs and offers banking services to those who did not have them, among other tasks.

Air, airport and train services are also operated —including those being built by the current administration— within the public company group Grupo Mundo Maya.

While there are issues to consider in order to maintain a real balance between civilian and military actors in this ‘civilian militarism’, as the scholar in the field Sebastián Raphael calls it, these are far removed from the concerns that humanity has regarding true militarism, that of destruction and death, and the role it plays in the suffering of entire portions of the world’s population and the destruction of life on the planet.

Israeli bombing of Tehran. Photo: Avash Media (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0)

Regarding the Maya Train, whose construction inevitably had environmental impacts including the deforestation of 6,659 hectares of jungle (according to the Mexican Center for Environmental Law), the national and foreign media overlooked the fact that simultaneously more than 400,000 hectares in the region were reforested as part of Sembrando Vida and that the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, the most important in the Maya Jungle, second in importance on our continent after the Amazon, not only increased its area by 5,000 hectares but its core zones – those with the strictest conservation measures – went from 200,000 to 519,000 hectares.

Europe is beginning to rearmament and with it the formation of war economies, which, despite a rhetoric of sovereignty, will primarily benefit the US military-industrial-digital complex.

Furthermore, the environmental impact of the construction of the Maya Train pales in comparison to the multiple ecocides that local communities have witnessed over the years , which were—and still are—little discussed from the center of the country and abroad.

In contrast to what is happening in Mexico, Europe is beginning to rearmam and with it the formation of war economies, which despite discourses around sovereignty will primarily benefit the US military-industrial-digital complex.

To finance it, NATO member countries are making adjustments primarily to their social spending, with a ten-year horizon to ‘achieve’ dedicating 5% of their respective GDP to national security.

None of these countries will escape the social impact of this rearmament; not Germany, which since the Second World War abandoned militarism, first by force and then by choice; nor Sweden, which for a long time not only rejected militarism but even financed social movements for peace; for the Netherlands it will mean doubling its defense spending in the next ten years, which will mean austerity for its people.

Not even Spain will be spared, despite Pedro Sánchez’s recent ‘No to war’ speech.

What is uniquely pathetic is that this is happening at the insistence of Donald Trump, a convicted criminal and dangerous narcissist who, along with the psychopath Netanyahu, is willing to lead the world into World War III or a nuclear debacle, which experts consider increasingly possible given the humiliation suffered by the United States and Israel two weeks after their military aggression against Iran.

Today, Europe lacks leadership that looks after the interests of its people and the future of humanity; its masks regarding respect for international law or the environment have fallen.

It is increasingly clear that Europe today lacks leadership that safeguards the interests of its people and the future of humanity. Its masks regarding respect for international law and the environment have fallen, and its true nature is visible to the global majority.

All wars cause destruction and human suffering—that is their purpose—and bring with them local, regional, and global environmental impacts. But the destructive capacity of our time is far greater than in previous decades, and the cruelty of those who instigate them also seems to be greater, as demonstrated by the attack on Tehran’s oil depots, in effect a chemical weapon that will have repercussions on the health of millions of people.

As reported by the Conflict and Environment Observatory, pollution incidents in the Middle East since the United States started this war are putting people and ecosystems at risk of serious and long-term damage, and trends point to considerable regional environmental damage as the war continues.

However, it is not necessary to wage war for true militarism to cause immense and irreversible damage to the systems that support life on the planet.

In alternative spaces in the United States, the film Earth’s Greatest Enemy is already being shown, documenting the environmental cost of the American empire —the greatest in history.


The documentary is the result of five years of work by American investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker Abby Martin, who, along with her partner Michael Prysner, a veteran of the Iraq War, have set out to help the citizens of their country open their eyes, and the global environmental movement to review its causes and slogans.

Of course, they are not the first to connect climate collapse and the environmental crisis with capitalism and its imperial instruments such as continuous war, and prominent figures in the global environmental movement have suffered the consequences of this shift in understanding the problem and of a more radical activism.

Abby Martin & Mike Prysner Photo: Jay Watts

This can be seen in the young Swedish woman Greta Thunberg, who ceased to be a star for the Western media and politicians as soon as she became active against the genocide in Gaza.

What the state of Israel is doing there with the backing of the United States and European powers has divided the youth climate movement on that continent, as other prominent leaders, such as the German Luisa Neubauer, find Greta’s position uncomfortable.

Thus, the genocide against the Palestinian people turned Thunberg into an enemy of the powerful, such as the technology billionaire and founder of Palantir Technologies Peter Thiel, who in a recent series of lectures on the antichrist said that it could very well be “someone like Greta”.

Abby Martin seeks to spread anger and rage against the monster of imperialism, but also inspiration and hope, as more and more people connect the dots of different crises and mobilize.

The documentary seeks to tell the full story of the existential crises brought about by US militarism and presents staggering statistics. Its military consumes (even when not engaged in war) around 270,000 barrels of oil every day, equivalent to 55 million cubic meters of greenhouse gases annually.

That military alone is the world’s largest polluter, consuming more fossil fuels than 150 countries. It should come as no surprise that its government has managed to keep military emissions out of the accounting reported to the international community.

Former president of Mexico, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, and the Tren Maya Photo: Jessica Ramírez

The film also narrates the impacts caused by military installations inside and outside the United States (it has between 800 and 1,000 worldwide) as well as local resistance to expel them, whether in Hawaii or Okinawa in Japan, and gives voice to the veterans’ movement who, affected physically and psychologically, are abandoned by their government and treated as human waste from wars.

In this way, Abby Martin seeks to spread anger and rage against the monster of imperialism, but also inspiration and hope, as more and more people, inside and outside her country, connect the dots of different crises and mobilize to confront the greatest enemy of humanity and the planet.

If citizens in Western democracies were asked whether their armies should build public infrastructure instead of waging war, they would surely choose that option, but their governments and media are not ready for that conversation.

Étienne von Bertrab is a lecturer in political ecology and communication for social change at the Development Planning Unit of University College London and the author of Más allá: una historia del Tren Maya.

  • People’s Mañanera March 25

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera March 25

    March 25, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on Plan B electoral reform, Housing for Wellbeing and housing as a social right, polls, and consular protection for Mexican migrants in the US.

  • Ecocidal Militarism

    Analysis

    Ecocidal Militarism

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    If citizens in Western democracies were asked whether their militaries should build public infrastructure instead of waging war, they would almost certainly choose the latter. Abby Martin’s newest film “The Greatest Enemy of the Earth,” documents the environmental cost of the American empire.

  • UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    Labor | News Briefs

    UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    The US-based autoworkers union called for immediate protection for Tornel workers and their families, as well as a public condemnation of the attack by Mexican authorities and industry leaders.

The post Ecocidal Militarism appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

107
 
 

By Vijay Prasad  –  Mar 19, 2026

On 13 March 2026, President Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez gave a press conference in Havana, Cuba. The country has been wracked by a worsening fuel and electricity crisis produced by the long-standing illegal US blockade, which the Trump administration tightened further in early 2026 by effectively cutting off oil shipments to the island. On 29 January, Trump issued an executive order filled with the bluster of falsehoods – including the claim that Cuba ‘welcomes transnational terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas’ – and threatened tariffs against any country that tried to send oil to Cuba.

Cuba produces about a 40% of the fuel it needs and imports the rest – mostly from Mexico and Venezuela. After the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela was forced to stop shipments to Cuba, while Mexico halted shipments under the threat of US tariffs. Cuba has not received oil since the first week of January. In early February, Deputy Prime Minister Oscar Pérez-Oliva Fraga said that the Cuban government would direct the remaining fuel to essential services – education, healthcare, and the supply of water and food. It was in this context that Díaz-Canel announced that Cuba and the United States had begun ‘a very sensitive process’ of talks aimed at addressing bilateral problems and taking ‘concrete actions for the benefit of the people of both countries’.

A few days before the press conference, a delegation from the International Peoples’ Assembly met with Díaz-Canel, who told us that the situation in Cuba is very difficult but that his government is doing everything it can to alleviate the hardship faced by the Cuban people. At the same time, he said, the revolution would not abandon its socialist principles of sovereignty and dignity. The quiet conviction with which Díaz-Canel spoke comforted us, and his words reflected what we heard from the people we spoke to across Havana (we could not travel beyond the capital because of the fuel crisis created by the oil blockade).

Trump’s latest assault on Cuba is a continuation of the illegal US blockade that began on 7 February 1962, when US President John F. Kennedy signed Proclamation 3447 under Section 620(a) of the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act, and was later consolidated in July 1963 under the authority of the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act. Kennedy’s move expanded the earlier trade restrictions imposed in 1960 and transformed them into a comprehensive ban on nearly all commercial and financial relations between the United States and Cuba. The blockade’s extraterritorial reach deepened over time, especially after 1991: the 1992 Torricelli Act barred foreign subsidiaries of US companies from trading with Cuba and imposed a 180-day restriction on vessels involved in trade with the island, and the 1996 Helms-Burton Act further – and illegally – extended the blockade’s reach to third countries and foreign companies.

The policy, then as now, is explicitly designed to weaken a Cuba that had sought to chart a sovereign path out of subordination, first to Europe and then, after 1898, to the United States. The United States used the blockade to punish Cuba for its defiance of US control and for the example that Cuba had begun to represent for other countries of the Third World. From the outset, the blockade’s intent went beyond diplomacy: internal US government documents reveal a strategy explicitly aimed at generating ‘economic dissatisfaction and hardship’ in Cuba to provoke political change. The blockade grew more complex and punitive over time. Rather than easing pressure during Cuba’s Special Period, which followed the fall of the Soviet Union when the island had lost its principal trading partner, the United States tightened its policy still further. Such extraterritorial enforcement directly conflicts with international trade norms and the sovereign rights of other states.

The US blockade of Cuba is widely accepted to be illegal under international law because it violates core principles of state sovereignty, non-intervention, and the right of other states to engage in lawful trade. These principles are enshrined in the United Nations system and, most importantly, in the 1945 Charter of the United Nations, which affirms the sovereign equality of states, prohibits the threat or use of force against their territorial integrity or political independence, and forbids intervention in matters essentially within their domestic jurisdiction. For the sake of clarity, it is worth referring to the main legal principles and instruments that the United States has flouted since 1962:

  • The 1945 Charter of the United Nations Articles 2(1), 2(4), and 2(7) affirm state sovereignty, prohibit the threat or use of force against territorial integrity or political independence, and forbid interference in domestic affairs.
  • The 1970 Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-Operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations declares that no state may use economic, political, or any other measures to coerce another government in order to subordinate the exercise of its sovereign rights.
  • The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted in 1966 and entered into force in 1976) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (adopted in 1966 and entered into force in 1976) recognise the right of peoples to self-determination, including control over their economic systems.

Apart from these explicit treaties in the United Nations system, there is also an older tradition of customary international law that protects freedom of international trade and that prohibits extraterritorial jurisdiction over third states. The blockade violates the principles of sovereign equality by attempting to dictate Cuba’s internal political and economic system. Its explicit intent to cause economic hardship constitutes unlawful intervention and coercion. The extraterritorial enforcement of US sanctions unlawfully interferes with the sovereign rights of third countries and their nationals. The absence of any United Nations Security Council authorisation further underscores the unilateral and coercive character of the blockade.

‘This Is Our Moncada, Our Bay of Pigs,’ Says Young Cuban Communist Leader

Every year since 1992 (except for 2020 when Covid prevented a vote), the United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly voted to condemn the blockade of Cuba, describing it as contrary to international law and the UN Charter. These resolutions emphasise that the policy violates Cuba’s right to self-determination and obstructs normal economic relations between states.

While General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, their consistency and near-universal support demonstrate a strong international consensus on the illegality of the measure. When the General Assembly held its most recent vote in October 2025, 165 out of 193 member states voted to end the blockade. Among them were some of the world’s most populous countries, such as Brazil, China, Nigeria, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan. Taken together, the countries that voted in favour represent approximately 92% of the world’s population. By any measure, the bulk of the world’s peoples oppose this illegal blockade.

A nurse at the Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery in Havana told me that it takes her over two hours to get to work from her home, but that she sees this inconvenience as part of her mission within the Cuban Revolution. It made me want to cry to hear the staff at the hospital talk about their commitment to their patients and to the Cuban revolutionary process. Because of the oil blockade and the resulting power fluctuations, the surgeons and nurses worry about performing delicate brain surgery. Their patients – some suffering from epilepsy or brain tumours – simply must wait.

Dr. Orestes López Piloto, the director of the hospital, walks me through the main ward. “I come from the southern part of Oriente [in eastern Cuba]. My family are workers and farmers, Black people who worked the soil,” he told me. “I am a doctor and a surgeon because of the revolution. And because of it, I am at one of the main medical centres of the country.” He looked directly into my eyes and said, “There are people who are against the revolution. But there are many more of us who are for it. And we are not afraid.”

(Tricontinental)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

108
 
 

By Dmitri Kovalevich  –  Mar 22, 2026

In the second half of March, the US and Israeli aggression against Iran is taking its toll on Ukraine. Retail stores are updating their prices daily, while the government is unable to keep gasoline prices in check through threats against sellers, as operators simply hide their product, creating artificial shortages.

Following the rapid deindustrialization that accompanied ‘independent’ Ukraine’s secession from the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the only remaining productive industry in the country is agriculture, specifically, the production of grain and corn for export. Ukrainian authorities now face a harsh choice: supply fuel to agrarians at the start of this year’s planting season, or divert dwindling fuel supplies to meet the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. According to Defense Minister Denys Shmyhal, supplying the Armed Forces of Ukraine remains the priority, in order that the proxy war by Western powers against the Russian Federation may continue.

He stated on March 1: “The war in Iran has triggered a global fuel crisis. Our key task is to supply the army. Sowing is the second priority. After that come businesses and people.”

European fuel suppliers have reduced their supplies to Ukraine in order to meet demand in their own markets. Fuel shipments from Poland have been suspended for one week, while Romania and Moldova have also temporarily halted fuel exports. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán already halted sales of diesel fuel and gasoline to Ukraine in February due to Ukraine’s disruption of natural gas supply to the country through the Druzhba pipeline from Russia.

As a result, Ukraine may be forced to seek fuel in more distant markets… and pay much higher prices for it. It is becoming increasingly clear that the Western imperialist powers cannot sustain two wars at once—one against Russia, the other against Iran.

Danylo Getmantsev, head of Ukraine’s legislative committee on tax policy, says that Ukraine could face serious fuel shortages as early as April if the war with Iran drags on. “According to analysts of the Ukrainian fuel market, the situation with a shortage of fuel and lubricants may arise in our country in April,” he said in early March. To counter this, Getmantsev proposes exploring opportunities to establish a strategic reserve of petroleum products in partner countries.

Andriy Gerus, head of the energy committee of the Ukrainian legislature, noted earlier in March that due to Russia’s shelling of oil depots, Ukraine has no remaining strategic fuel reserves. “Everything is operating on a just-in-time basis; there are no remaining stocks of cheaper resources, so any price change in Europe quickly translates into a price change in Ukraine.” He explains that fuel in Ukraine will always be more expensive than in Europe.

Legislator Oleksandr Dubinsky, currently in jail accused of treason, believes that due to the war against Iran, the economic situation in Ukraine has become critical, much like it was in February 2022 at the start of the war. “Society and the army are exhausted. Exchange rates, energy costs, and prices have risen. The budget deficit is widening. At the same time, uncertainty is growing,” Dubinsky explains.

Nevertheless, according to Dubinsky, officials in Kiev believe that Ukraine is seen as too important in the global game to be allowed to fail, so money for its survival as a Western vassal will be found regardless of the widespread corruption that has further overwhelmed the Ukrainian economy beginning in 2022.

Legislator Yuriy Boyko says that if oil reaches $200 per barrel, everyone will feel the impact. “In that case, the planting season will be at risk, and prices for goods will rise sharply. Ukrainians aren’t well-off to begin with, so we can’t let that happen,” the lawmaker says.

Another legislator, Mykhailo Tsymbaliuk, has stated that high gasoline prices are already affecting the country’s military capabilities. According to him, the fuel being allocated by the Ministry of Defense is insufficient for the armed forces, causing grave problems. Even evacuations of wounded soldiers are being compromised. “The skyrocketing price of gasoline has become a serious warning sign for the Armed Forces of Ukraine,” the lawmaker warns.

Ukraine’s European supporters will continue for some time to divert fuel resources away from their own needs in order to supply the Ukrainian Armed Forces with gasoline, even at the expense of their own citizens. However, with every passing week and month that the war with Iran continues, the cost of such assistance will rise sharply for them.

In March, Ukrainian lawmakers told Ukrainian media that European governments are urging them to assure Ukraine keeps fighting Russia for another year-and-a-half to two years. “The Europeans have told us ‘Keep fighting for another year and a half to two years; we’ll provide the money you need,’” reports the publication Zerkalo Nedeli on March 12.

Under such pressure, Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy has tasked the political leadership in the national legislature to continue functioning for several more years without an electoral mandate. The last national election Ukraine took place in April 2019, with a five-year mandate. It featured the banning of political parties deemed to be sympathetic to dialogue and good relations with Russia, a feature of the system that took power in February 2014 following a violent coup spearheaded by neo-Nazi paramilitaries.

To so many Ukrainians, the urgings and hidden threats by the leaders of ‘civilized Europe’ mean they will continue to be abducted from their own streets for two more years by the recruiters of Kiev’s compulsory military service.

None of the possible scenarios cited by Ukrainian military experts envisage a Russian defeat or the recapture of territories lost by Ukraine. In other words, the sole result of scenarios for continued war being urged is continued destruction of the Ukrainian population, all politely funded by European/NATO-member governments.

This approach speaks volumes about the overall strategy of Kiev and its Western allies. Theirs is a ‘strategy’ of holding out for a while longer without any long-term expectation of peace, hoping for some ‘black swan’ event (‘extremely rare and unpredictable’) that will drastically change the geopolitical situation. In other words, Western imperialism and its Ukrainian stooges are pinning their hopes on a miracle that might save them all.

Ukraine’s European ‘allies’, in truth, currently lack the funds to continue the war in Ukraine. They are negotiating a €90 billion loan for the country, but as mentioned above, European Union member Hungary is currently blocking this proposal.

Meanwhile, on March 18, Ukrainian media, citing a US State Department report, reported that USAID auditors have uncovered irregularities in the oversight of the more than $30 billion in direct budget support to Kiev since February 2022. There are a great many corruption scandals festering in Ukraine, but none have acted as grounds for refusing further loans and financial aid, despite the evidence that much of that could be embezzled.

Zelenskyy told the BBC during a visit to Britain on March 17 (which included a warm welcome by the British monarchy) that the war in Iran raises ominous forebodings about Ukraine’s future. Yet as Ukrainian media has noted, Zelensky is a firm supporter of that war.

In a speech to the annual Munich Security Conference on February 14, Zelensky called for measures to “immediately stop” Iran, without any delay. “Regimes like the one in Iran must not be given time. When they have time, they only kill more. They must be stopped immediately.”

Then, on February 27, he told an interview with Sky News that he supported an operation to depose the Iranian leadership.

Ukraine’s European allies are currently concerned with how to win back Donald Trump’s favor and persuade him to continue funding the Zelensky-led government in Kiev. Finnish President Alexander Stubb fears that negotiations on Ukraine are approaching a “moment of truth” that could force Kiev to formally cede territory in the Donbass region to Moscow. (Populations there voted in 2022 and before that to secede from coup Ukraine and join the Russian Federation.)

American/Ukrainians Caught Arming Militants in Myanmar and the US Dirty War on China

Europe, Stubb says, finds itself in a difficult position due to reductions in direct US aid to Ukraine. He proposes an odd trade-off to resolve this dilemma, namely, an ‘exchange’ of military assistance by Ukraine to the US and “Israel” in the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for continued assistance to Kiev’s war. That includes a proposal that the European Union agree to provide the US with military assistance to unblock the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for increases in direct US supplies to Ukraine.

But this is wishful thinking. The European Union member-countries of NATO lack the military capabilities required to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. They do have experience (gained during the Ukrainian crisis) in buying time and ‘bogging down’ the crisis in the Middle East through numerous rounds of fruitless negotiations with Iran. The essence of the EU approach would see the Iranian side fulfilling certain conditions in the here and now, while the West and its allies promise to ‘do something’ to normalize relations, but at a later time.

During the war in Ukraine, we witnessed endless negotiations in this vein under the ‘Minsk-1’ and ‘Minsk-2’ agreements in 2014 and early 2015. Then there was the ‘grain deal’ of July 2022, whereby the Russian navy would allow Ukraine to export grain from Black Sea ports. In all these cases, Ukraine and the West failed to fulfill their part of the commitments.

Oleg Yasinsky, a Ukrainian political analyst now living in Chile, commented on March 19 about the resistance of the Iranian people to aggression and the tradition of deception to which the West has consistently resorted during negotiations following military failures. “Once upon a time, the ancestors of today’s democratic world leaders negotiated with Indigenous peoples as they plundered and conquered them. At peace-signing ceremonies with the indigenous peoples of Patagonia, poison-laced whale carcasses were served at the table, while in the cold mountains of North America, smallpox-infected blankets and clothing were given as gifts to original peoples.

“Today, from Minsk for Russia to Geneva for Iran, the peacemaking traditions of the ‘civilized world’ have not changed one bit in all this time. Therefore and unfortunately,” he concludes, “missiles are the only real negotiators today.”

Zelensky is now desperately traveling around the world seeking to regain attention for his government as Iran becomes the main topic of global media. He is ‘jumping on the bandwagon’ of war against Iran in efforts to render some valuable service to Western imperialism and prove his continued usefulness. He has offered Ukrainian troops to guard “Israel” and Western military bases in the Gulf and in Cyprus. Alas for him, Trump has dismissed his obsequious ‘servant,’ going so far as to say that “Zelensky is the last person from whom we would need help.”

According to Odessa-based anarchist Vyacheslav Azarov, Ukraine is scrambling to align itself with the dominant theme in international politics and position itself as a useful part of the crisis exploding in the Middle East. Demands for additional support to Kiev are being delivered from this new vantage point. However, in the end, Kiev may simply end up with “additional airstrikes accompanied by the friendly shrieking of minor allies who have no real influence” and a large, new adversary in the form of Iran.”

Zelensky’s humiliating traveling and messaging does not go unnoticed in Ukraine. But the pompous president, who sees himself as a sage colonialist in the style of Winston Churchill and is continuously applauded by the governments of European countries, turns out to be a frightened servant, fearing that his ‘masters’ may abandon him. The war waged by Western imperialism against the Iranian people has once again underscored the weakness and dubious value of Zelensky’s government, whose image the West has artificially inflated for years through its media.

(Al-Mayadeen English)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

109
 
 

By Misión Verdad – Mar 24, 2026

The Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV) published updated data on the country’s balance of payments. The institution had not published these figures since 2019.

The balance of payments is the statistical record of all economic transactions (goods, services, and capital) carried out between all residents and businesses of a country and the rest of the world during a specific period. This figure illustrates how the country’s import/export trade performed.

The published data corresponds to the end of 2025. According to the main national banking institution, total exports amounted to approximately 26.785 billion US dollars (USD).

Oil exports totaled USD 18.212 billion. This represents 67.9% of the country’s total revenue from exports.

The data suggest that while oil exports remain the essential basis of foreign exchange earnings for the country, the percentage of other, non-oil activities, has become more relevant.

This is largely explained by the number of barrels of crude oil that have been exported. While Venezuela has revived its oil and fuel exports, these remain considerably lower compared to the years prior to 2019.

BCV data also indicate that oil import expenditures totaled USD 2.521 billion, a reduction of 3.74% compared to 2024.

This data is clearly linked to the import of goods and services intended for the development of hydrocarbon activity, which suggests that the reduction was associated with the restrictions imposed by hostile foreign trade measures such as the illegal US sanctions.

Detailed analysis of the economic damage
The figures released by the BCV illustrate a widespread and profound damage to hydrocarbon activities, which are the fundamental basis of the Venezuelan economy.

The amounts obtained from oil exports in 2023, 2024, and 2025 are remarkably similar to those of 1997, 1998, and 1999, a time of very low oil prices when barrels of crude were priced between USD 10 and 15 internationally.

The data indicates that similar amounts were received from oil exports during the years 2024 and 2025, this being an income in the lowest range, compared to the records from 2000 to 2019.

Regarding the data released, economist Luis Oliveros indicated on social media that Venezuela received, between 2019 and 2025 (seven years), an income similar to that which the country obtained in 2012 alone.

Oliveros described the data for 2020 as “alarming”: “In 2012, the country received USD 93.097 billion; in 2020, it was USD 4.815 billion, a decrease of 95%,” the economist stated.

The data shows a clear restriction of Venezuelan exports in terms of barrels due to the cycle of illegal sanctions.

The drop in revenue over the past seven years meant that Venezuela did not obtain substantial benefits, for example, in the 2022, 2023, and 2024 cycles, when crude oils reached 100, 82, and 81 USD/barrel (Brent), respectively.

This is significant. The impact of hostile trade measures must be estimated beyond net losses. It is also necessary to consider “lost profits”—or what the country failed to earn during those years.

Considering the last cycle of high crude oil prices (2022, 2023, and 2024) and assuming that no sanctions had been issued against the national economy and that the country maintained the level of barrel production of 2013 (just before the first sanctions), Venezuela would have received about USD 250 billion.

According to the record, non-oil activities last experienced a recession in 2021, registering -3.47%, thus reflecting the relationship of sanctions on hydrocarbons with the behavior of other sectors of the Venezuelan economy.

Other relevant data
The financial institution has disclosed other additional and complementary data.

Throughout 2025, a balance of payments surplus (positive) of USD 2.2 billion was recorded, reflecting a favorable external position.

The institution also noted a recovery in the national gross domestic product (GDP). The economy completed 19 consecutive quarters of growth, expanding by 8.66% by the end of 2025.

After a brutal drop in GDP, the Venezuelan economy began a path of year-on-year growth that slowed in 2025 with the end of some oil licenses. Photo: Banca y Negocios.

After a brutal drop in GDP, the Venezuelan economy began a path of year-on-year growth that slowed in 2025 with the end of some oil licenses. Photo: Banca y Negocios.

Oil activity was the main driver of growth in 2025: it showed a significant growth of 13.41% in the fourth quarter of last year.

Non-oil activity has grown since 2022, by 13.8% in 2022; 4.3% in 2023; 5.6% in 2024; and 6.3% in 2025, this sustained growth was clearly linked to the dynamics imposed by sanctions and licenses.

The year of greatest growth in the non-oil sector is precisely the point of the Biden administration’s licensing policies.

According to the Venezuelan media outlet specializing in economics, Banca y Negocios (Banking and Business), between 2021 and 2025, some sectors have stood out, such as construction, which shows high levels of sustained growth in the period, with a maximum of 86.19% in 2021 and a specific minimum of 0.54% in 2023, which can be described as very volatile behavior.

“In 2024 and 2025, construction led the non-oil sectors with annualized increases of 20.17% and 30.72%. However, this is a sector that has suffered from a historical lag between 2013 and 2019, with drops exceeding 50% annually in 2017 and 2018,” the media outlet indicated.

The growth of the non-oil sector in recent years was bolstered by the growth of the Construction, Mining, Financial Activities and Manufacturing sectors. Photo: Banca y Negocios.

The growth of the non-oil sector in recent years was bolstered by the growth in construction, mining, financial activities, and the manufacturing sectors. Photo: Banca y Negocios.

They also highlight “financial activities” and “insurance”—despite the sharp drop of -21.14% in 2021—which has been offset by the expansions of 20.17% and 30.72% reported in 2024 and 2025, due to the dynamism of the digitization of payments and the growth of credit.

“Mining” has also stood out in the last two annual periods, with above-average expansions of 14.85% in 2024 and 10.92% in 2025.

“Growth has also been conditioned by a complex geopolitical situation due to the sanctions imposed by the United States on vital Venezuelan oil operations, which have hampered the possibilities of a more accelerated expansion,” the Banca y Negocios publication stated.

Undoubtedly, the data illustrate a direct relationship between the dynamics of sanctions and oil licenses with other sectors of the economy. The impact of the economic, commercial, and financial blockade has been undeniable.

(Misión Verdad)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

110
 
 

In order to facilitate the development of Venezuela’s economy and to provide security for investors, Venezuela has again demanded that the United States lift the illegal sanctions and blockade that it has maintained against the country since 2014. The request was made this Tuesday, March 24, by Acting President Delcy Rodríguez.

“Politics also speaks, and we have asked President Trump, for the benefit of investors, not only for Venezuela, which needs it, that there be no sanctions against Venezuela or its economy, but also for investors,” she stated during a meeting with national and international investors. “A license does not provide the necessary certainty for a long-term investment.”

From Miraflores Palace, the seat of the national government in Caracas, she cited as an example the case of the US transnational Chevron, which at one point was granted a license by the US regime. The license was then taken away by the US regime, and then it was granted again.

In that context, she emphasized that both the United States and Venezuelan governments must create “real conditions for investments in the country to develop in the short, medium, and long term. That’s why I speak about building real long-term bilateral relations; solid, with solid political and economic foundations.”

She added that there must be “a clear cooperation agenda, and that is where I call for the legal environment of both countries to provide security to the investor.”

“That is why we have insisted that the sanctions against Venezuela must cease, both as a matter of law but also so that investors feel confident that their investments here have a legislative and legal framework that provides them with that security,” she said.

After launching a military attack on Venezuela in the early hours of Saturday, January 3, and  abducting the Constitutional and legitimate president, Nicolás Maduro, the Trump regime has issued licenses lifting a series of restrictions that they themselves unilaterally imposed for 12 years against the Venezuelan hydrocarbon sector in their eagerness to destroy the Venezuelan economy and overthrow the national government.

It is worth noting that most of these “licenses” cover authorizations for US industries; however, they also include restrictions on countries that the US considers its enemies: China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or Cuba.

On February 18, the US regime extended for another year the sanctions imposed on March 8, 2015, by then-President Barack Obama, in Executive Order 13692, which laughably declared Venezuela as an “unusual and extraordinary threat.”

Since 2015, both Obama and the presidents who succeeded him, namely Donald Trump in his first term (2017-2021) and in his second (2025-), as well as Joe Biden (2021-2025), have imposed more than a thousand sanctions on Venezuela.

This is the fifth time in the last two months that the acting president has asked the Trump administration to lift the sanctions against Venezuela. One of those requests was on March 14, when she rejected Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s proposal for zero tariffs on all bilateral trade, citing the inequality caused by US sanctions against the nation.

“President Trump, this is the sentiment of our people, but it is also the way for Latin America, which you have referred to, to move forward together with balanced and equitable growth, where Venezuela also contributes to regional growth,” Rodríguez stated on March 14. “From here, Venezuela, in national unity, calls for the lifting of sanctions, the end of the blockade, and the establishment of cooperative, friendly, and collaborative relationships based on equality and respect.”

On February 26, 2026, 48 hours after Donald Trump referred to Venezuela as a “new partner and friend,” Acting President Delcy Rodríguez addressed a message to the US president requesting that he end the blockade and sanctions against the nation. That was the first appeal.

The following day, February 27, the acting president of Venezuela again demanded an end to the economic blockade imposed by the US against the country, calling for a reminder that it has significantly affected the local economy due to the restrictions placed on industries in the hydrocarbon sector.

On March 2, Rodríguez again asked the US president to lift the blockade and the unilateral coercive measures that his country maintains against Venezuela.

Guaranteed investments
This Tuesday, March 24, after expressing her satisfaction with the presence of a delegation of international and national investors, the acting president highlighted that this sector has guarantees so that its investments can develop extensively.

She affirmed to investors that “those who think, believe, based on the numbers and the analyses, that this is a good time and that Venezuela is a good place to invest, should know that they have guarantees, legal security, political security, stability, and peace of mind so that their investments can develop extensively, not only in the hydrocarbon sector, where there are many opportunities, but also in the mining sector.”

She noted that Venezuela, in addition to having the largest oil reserves on the planet, also has “one of the largest gold reserves in the world,” as well as reserves of bauxite and diamonds—”gigantic reserves that undoubtedly become a space for investment and development. ”

She recalled that these large resources should have an impact on the development of the national economy and on Venezuelan industry.

“That’s why I am so pleased that you can have meetings with Venezuelan businesspeople, because it allows you to know that there are business chambers here for each sector and that you can talk with your counterparts in the country and form alliances that will boost the national industry and the Venezuelan productive sectors,” she added.

She emphasized that the meetings between international investors and productive sectors, entrepreneurs, and businesspeople in Venezuela allow the parties to follow a joint path “so that we can move forward and so that you can see firsthand the progress we have made in the economic sphere and environment.”

The event was attended by the Vice President of Economy and Finance Calixto Ortegam the Minister of Ecological Mining Development Héctor Silva, the Minister of Hydrocarbons Paula Henao, and the Minister of Economy, Finance, and Foreign Trade Anabel Pereira.

The Mining Law will be approved within hoursThe acting president informed investors that the Organic Law of Mines, currently being debated in the National Assembly, is expected to be approved this week. She stated that the law “makes significant progress in international standards and protocols for investment and mining and in business models for the mining sector.”

In that regard, she noted, “There is tax relief being introduced” in the legislation, which will be approved between Wednesday and Thursday of this week. She indicated that this “is very good news for sectors that want to invest in this area.”

The National Parliament approved, in its first discussion, on Monday, March 9, the Organic Law of Mines Bill, whose objective is to promote national and international investment in the country’s mining sector.

Rodríguez emphasized that Venezuela is making progress in important legislative reforms that can provide greater legal certainty to investors in the country.

In that context, she recalled that the first law that was reformed was the Organic Hydrocarbons Law, “which took very important steps, based on experience that we had, in the last two years, established within the framework of the economic blockade and sanctions, a legislative framework that allowed for creative forms of association with both national and international investment sectors, one of which became very famous, which is the CPP, Productive Participation Contract in Hydrocarbons.”

“We’re Playing the Caribbean Game”: Franco Vielma on Venezuela’s Hydrocarbons Law and Strategic Resistance

Regarding the CPPs, she said on Tuesday that the contract allowed the investment of nearly one billion dollars in 2025 to “allow us to recover 200,000 barrels of oil,” that is, to increase production.

“This type of business partnership is incorporated into the new Hydrocarbons Law,” she explained. “The reform also includes a new tax regime, with special incentives for investment in green fields, which were not previously considered but rather treated the same as type A fields, the brown fields. Now they have a practically new system, a tax regime for investments that allows for a faster recovery of the investment made in the country in these green fields.”

On Thursday, January 29, before an audience of oil sector workers and deputies to the National Assembly, the acting president, Delcy Rodríguez, promulgated the partial reform of the Hydrocarbons Law, which was unanimously approved hours earlier by the National Assembly.

On March 24, Rodríguez emphasized that Venezuela, in addition to having the largest crude oil reserves on the planet, wants to be an oil-producing powerhouse.

Finally, she added that the national government maintains a working agenda with companies that are arriving in the country.

(Diario VEA) by Yuleidys Hernández Toledo

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

111
 
 

Statement released by the United Autoworkers union on March 24, 2026.

The UAW today condemned the shooting of striking workers at the Tornel Rubber Company in Tultitlán, Mexico, calling it a grave attack on fundamental labor and human rights and urging swift action by Mexican authorities and USMCA partners.

On March 18, four workers were injured when armed assailants opened fire on workers on night duty as they lawfully exercised their right to strike.

The strike at Tornel Rubber Company stems from alleged violations of the Mexican Rubber Industry Contract-Law, including:

  • Non-implementation of a 40-hour workweek
  • Unpaid 44-day year-end bonus
  • Denial of proper vacation premium (25–31 days)
  • Failure to pay social security contributions
  • Non-recognition of official paid holidays (Feb. 5, Mar. 21)

The UAW is calling on Mexican authorities to ensure the safety of workers and to carry out a transparent investigation to hold those responsible accountable.

The situation reflects broader concerns about efforts within the rubber industry to weaken established labor standards and collective bargaining agreements. The UAW is urging the governments of the United States and Canada to take immediate action under the USMCA Rapid Response Labor Mechanism. Specifically, the UAW is calling for USTR to immediately self-initiate a complaint under the USMCA’s Rapid Response Mechanism.

“What happened at Tornel Rubber is an outrage. It’s an attack on human rights, on labor rights, and on the basic democratic freedoms of workers. The right to strike, to organize, and to bargain collectively are non-negotiable. When workers are met with gunfire for exercising those rights, the UAW will not tolerate it. We’re committed to fighting like hell to make sure every worker can stand up, organize, and demand what they’re owed without facing violence,” said UAW President Shawn Fain.

The UAW emphasized that failure to respond decisively risks undermining labor reforms and trade commitments across North America.

UAW Demands:

  • Immediate protection for Tornel workers and their families
  • Full enforcement of the Rubber Industry Contract-Law
  • Public condemnation of the attack by Mexican authorities and industry leaders
  • Independent USMCA complaint initiated by the U.S.

The UAW reaffirmed its solidarity with Tornel workers, who voted on March 22 to continue their strike.

  • People’s Mañanera March 25

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera March 25

    March 25, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on Plan B electoral reform, Housing for Wellbeing and housing as a social right, polls, and consular protection for Mexican migrants in the US.

  • Ecocidal Militarism

    Analysis

    Ecocidal Militarism

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    If citizens in Western democracies were asked whether their militaries should build public infrastructure instead of waging war, they would almost certainly choose the latter. Abby Martin’s newest film “The Greatest Enemy of the Earth,” documents the environmental cost of the American empire.

  • UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    Labor | News Briefs

    UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    The US-based autoworkers union called for immediate protection for Tornel workers and their families, as well as a public condemnation of the attack by Mexican authorities and industry leaders.

The post UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

112
 
 

This article by Gloria López originally appeared in the March 24, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

After several days of the work stoppage that kept thousands of students without classes, the Colegio de Bachilleres (COLBACH) announced the resumption of its academic and administrative activities starting tomorrow, March 25, after reaching an agreement with the workers’ union.

In a statement, it was reported that the agreement was reached through dialogue between system authorities and the National Independent Union of Workers of the Colegio de Bachilleres (SINTCB), which allowed the strike that affected 20 schools in Mexico City and the State of Mexico since March 19 to be lifted.

Following the agreement reached, classes and administrative work will officially resume at all campuses and offices. Authorities emphasized that dialogue was key to building consensus and addressing labour demands in accordance with the legal framework.

The Colegio de Bachilleres reported that it will implement academic strategies to recover learning and regularize school trajectories, with the aim of avoiding negative impacts on the educational development of students.

Finally, the institution called on the student community, teachers, and administrative staff to return to activities, reiterating its commitment to the right to education.

  • People’s Mañanera March 25

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera March 25

    March 25, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on Plan B electoral reform, Housing for Wellbeing and housing as a social right, polls, and consular protection for Mexican migrants in the US.

  • Ecocidal Militarism

    Analysis

    Ecocidal Militarism

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    If citizens in Western democracies were asked whether their militaries should build public infrastructure instead of waging war, they would almost certainly choose the latter. Abby Martin’s newest film “The Greatest Enemy of the Earth,” documents the environmental cost of the American empire.

  • UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    Labor | News Briefs

    UAW Condemns Violent Attack on Tornel Rubber Workers in Mexico, Urges Action

    March 25, 2026March 25, 2026

    The US-based autoworkers union called for immediate protection for Tornel workers and their families, as well as a public condemnation of the attack by Mexican authorities and industry leaders.

The post Strike Ends at Colegio de Bachilleres After Agreement with Workers appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

113
 
 

This article by Silvia Chávez originally appeared in the March 24, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Tultitlán, Mexico. Representatives of the Hulera Tornel company did not appear at the conciliation hearing scheduled by the Federal Center for Conciliation and Labour Registration of Mexico City for this Tuesday, reported union leader Gerardo Alberto Meneses Ávila, who said that 1,051 workers are maintaining the strike movement that began on February 23.

“The National Union of Workers of the Tornel Company attended the meeting, but the employers did not attend, although they were not obligated to attend, they should have been present because it is a matter of interest to their workers,” stated the union’s general secretary, Meneses Ávila, who said that he went to the Federal Center at ten in the morning accompanied by a lawyer.

He commented that the company was duly notified four days ago and the union representatives promptly attended the call from the labour authority with the objective of enforcing and protecting the labour rights of the 1,051 workers of the Tornel company; he stressed that in these times of transformation the working class expects actions with labour justice.

Representatives from the Hulera Tornel company failed to appear at the conciliation hearing scheduled by the Federal Center for Conciliation and Labour Registration in Mexico City for Tuesday, reported union leader Gerardo Alberto Meneses Ávila. Photo: Silvia Chávez González

Gerardo Alberto Meneses stated that the union filed a formal complaint at the Federal Center for Conciliation and Labour Registration in Mexico City, through which the union requests the intervention of President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, the Secretary of Labour and Social Welfare, Marath Baruch Bolaños López, the Governor of the State of Mexico, Delfina Gómez Álvarez, and the Head of Government of Mexico City, Clara Brugada Molina.

He emphasized that the intervention of the aforementioned authorities is for a solution to the labour conflict, in which the employer is not complying with the legal framework in labour matters, affecting 1,051 workers and their families.

He stated that the resistance continues and that the path will be followed in the Labour Court, that the union went to a conciliation, but there was no response.

It is worth remembering that last Sunday, the union base, by majority vote, with 883 votes in favor and 113 against, endorsed the outbreak of the strike that began on February 23 in its four plants located in the municipalities of Azcapotzalco (two), Miguel Hidalgo (one), in Mexico City and in the municipality of Tultitlán (one), State of Mexico.

The post Hit & Run: Tornel Rubber Company Didn’t Attend Labour Conciliation Hearing appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

114
 
 

We’re now 13 months into the most recent outbreak of measles in Mexico, and the numbers remain alarming. In a recently published report, the Secretary of Health acknowledged a total of 33,892 probable cases in the country, 13,408 of which have been confirmed, along with 35 confirmed deaths.

Efforts to mitigate the current crisis will be temporary and superficial so long as the federal government does not seriously rethink and retool its health system to prioritize its most marginalized and most vulnerable populations.

Chihuahua, where the first cases emerged, leads in the number of deaths by a wide margin with 21. The next closest is Jalisco with 4, while Mexico City and Durango each have 2. But the data only tell part of the story.

The demographic profiles of the deceased and the uneven distribution of infection and vulnerability point to a systemic problem—not just an epidemiological one. Its roots go back decades and demonstrate deep and widespread social inequality, ones that the government seems unwilling, or at least too dysfunctional, to attend to.

The country will almost certainly succeed at keeping this epidemic from ballooning into a full-blown, COVID-style emergency (if only because measles is a known quantity, a vaccine for it already exists, and the campaign to stamp it out has already been underway).

Even so, all efforts to mitigate the current crisis will be temporary and superficial so long as the federal government (in tandem with the states) does not seriously rethink and retool its health system to prioritize its most marginalized and most vulnerable populations. And that, as many experts are saying, will take a degree of coordination heretofore unseen.

The Usual Victims in All-Too-Familiar Territory

The shortcomings of the existing healthcare system were brought into sharp relief in the earliest days of the outbreak, in Chihuahua. Members of the Mexican Mennonite community brought the infection back with them after attending an international Mennonite conference in Canada in 2024. They spread it on their passage through the US via Seminole, Texas, before finally returning to Chihuahua—which is home to the largest Mennonite communities in the country.

“In this community, they essentially decide to let the rest of the children get sick naturally, because they believe this will give them natural immunity,” says Leticia Ruiz, Director of Prevention and Disease Control in the Chihuahua State Health Department. According to Ruiz, the Mennonite community let the infection ride its course—not out of religious but rather personal conviction against vaccines and an erroneous confidence in “natural immunity”. (At least in the United States, the Mennonite Church has no central doctrine condoning or condemning vaccines, but defers to the individual.)

That said, Ruiz estimates that general vaccine coverage is “well below 50%” in the community. “It’s only when a child needs to be hospitalized that we realize these beliefs among families and within the community—that vaccination isn’t necessary and that natural immunity is part of nature.”

Though Ruiz and her team swiftly and effectively attended to the more densely concentrated affected zones (overcoming barriers to communicating with the primarily German-speaking Mennonites), the outbreak eventually escaped containment and quickly spread through the migrant day laborer population—starting with those workers in the employ of the Mennonites. “These [Mennonite] communities rely on hiring people from outside to work in the fields, and they get sick.”

The Mennonites’ insularity disintegrates at the site of labor transaction, as Jose Luis Gonzalez and Cassandra Garrison have observed: “[Their] interaction with the outside world is mostly restricted to their relationships with local people who work for them as laborers in the community or to trips into town to buy goods.” That means that, like essential workers in the United States, these farm workers and day laborers found themselves on the frontlines of the emergency, unprepared and un-cared for.

As the unvaccinated are at particular risk of contracting and suffering complications and death from measles, the disparity between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous population illustrates major policy flaws.

And, as Dr. Andrés Castañeda Prado, Federal Coordinator of the National Coordination of the National Public Security System (SNSP), emphasizes, this population is structurally positioned to bear the brunt of all kinds of social pressures, but specifically medically-related ones.

“They’re…people in vulnerable situations because they face issues of malnutrition, deprivation, of course, lack of social security, and years of neglect by the system.” Hailing overwhelmingly from the country’s south and southeast, these internal migrant workers go where the work is, often at the mercy of exploitative employers and hazardous conditions. “They have a higher risk of infection,” as they confront compounding risks: traveling in crammed trucks, on trains, and overcrowded work and living arrangements.

To reach the immediately affected workers, many of whom are Indigenous, Ruiz and her team deputized community leaders as coordinators who could facilitate the vaccination of “60,000 day laborers, 20,000… on the move.” And that was in the early days. Ruiz’s team ramped up vaccination to “almost 700,000 over those three critical months—that’s what triggered a significant drop” in infections. But physically reaching the most vulnerable, as well as targeting messaging to them, was no easy task, considering their transient behavior and the geographic remoteness of the population.

The Indigenous population in Mexico is often the first to suffer at the hands of state violence, and the last to receive any kind of social benefits that might justify the existence of big government, and medical attention is no different. Language and location barriers, lack of medical coverage and education, and stigma make it hard for medical workers to reach this group, as was seen notably with COVID vaccination distribution and uptake). To this day, the government isn’t doing nearly enough to bridge the gap.

And, as the unvaccinated are at particular risk of contracting and suffering complications and death from measles, the disparity between the Indigenous and non-Indigenous population illustrates major policy flaws in the federal and state governments response, ones that put the entire population at risk.

Slipping Through Ever-Widening Cracks: The Jalisco Case

If the outbreak’s path through Mennonite communities and migrant workers exposed socioeconomic vulnerabilities, its spread to Jalisco revealed another kind: political negligence.

Lemus and company can tout their state-of-the-art IMSS-Bienestar-insulated teaching hospital & Social Security alternative until they’re blue in the face, but it won’t do a bit of good if they don’t put them to use in a timely, efficient manner.

As the infection spread from state to state along commercial and migratory routes, it revealed in its wake the “inequality gaps [in]…vaccination, failed campaigns, [and] failed epidemiological surveillance,” in Jalisco, says Deputy Mariana Casillas Guerrero. For her, the measles resurgence in her state (which, as of late February, has reported 2,662 cases or 59% of all cases in the country) is not “just bad luck,” but a powder keg that’s been waiting to blow.

Insofar as Jalisco has become the new epicenter of the outbreak, Casillas Guerrero does not mince words: the ruling center-left Movimiento Ciudadano (MC), the current Governor Pablo Lemus Navarro, and its previous governor Enrique Alfaro (who resigned from the MC a week into his governorship) are all to blame, at least in part, for putting inter-party politics above the wellbeing of the jaliscienses.

“There is public evidence that the state executive, in this case Pablo Lemus, has refused to join the IMSS-Bienestar program, and Congress itself has also had to urge the governor to sign this agreement to guarantee medications and care for the entire population right now.”

Deputy Mariana Casillas Guerrero, Photo: @MarianaCasGe

Casillas Guerrero is referring to Governor Lemus’s renewed rejection (following in his predecessor’s footsteps) to participate in the federal agency Health Services of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS-Bienestar) opened by former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador in 2022 in his attempt to extend universal medical access to those who don’t receive coverage through their employers or the state (like the day laborers working the Mennonite farms). Lemus points to a perceived lack of medication (hardly the case) and dignified working conditions for medical professionals (debateable) in the agency as his justification for keeping Jalisco’s system separate and not committing a “historic error.”

Casillas Guerrero doesn’t buy it. For her, Lemus’s resistance isn’t about policy—it’s politics. “Jalisco has been holding onto this administrative exemption as if it were a political banner—but more than political, it’s an electoral banner,” implying the MC party’s a priori resistance to Morena’s platform. (Incidentally, the MC party’s victories can in large be attributed to longstanding anti-AMLO sentiment in the region.)

Moreover, Lemus’s tough talk rings hollow considering that he and his state had plenty of lead-time before the outbreak to assemble a preventative program—and they failed to take advantage of it. “The Pan American Health Organization did warn us that there was a massive spike in cases in this specific region from 2025 to 2026, and it was a problem we’d been grappling with since late last year.” The National Committee for Epidemiological Surveillance sent out a warning in February of 2025 on the brewing crisis that should have sounded alarm bells, and yet they officials sat on their hands for months.

So Lemus and company can tout their state-of-the-art IMSS-Bienestar-insulated teaching hospital and Social Security alternative until they’re blue in the face, but it won’t do a bit of good if they don’t put them to use in a timely, efficient manner.

Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Mexico City Photo: Jay Watts

A Far Cry from How Things Used to Be, and a Long Way to Go

The truth is that, viewed in its historical context, IMSS-Bienestar—while by no means a perfect institution—still represents a huge leap forward for Mexico’s healthcare system, one accomplished in a very short period of time. “What we have done,” says Ulises Rangel Cruz, former deputy director of Strategic Information Coordination at IMSS-Bienestar, “is make the largest investment in medical infrastructure in the last 36 years.” He goes on to enumerate:

“IMSS-Bienestar reclaimed more than 100 hospitals that had been abandoned, since the PRI and the PAN paid for hospitals and left them as unfinished structures, half-built; they left 300 hospitals unfinished, and during the COVID pandemic, we reclaimed them. We equipped them, put them into operation, and continue to open new hospitals. We have granted permanent positions to more than 56,000 healthcare workers who previously had precarious contracts in the states. In other words: no administration had ever granted permanent positions to doctors. Today, they earn a salary three times higher than what they received when state governments were in charge. This is the first time the Mexican government has created a health services institution for people without social security. Previously, there was no federal institution of this kind.”

In the 80s, long before AMLO and Morena’s ascent to power and the rollout of the Fourth Transformation, the Mexican healthcare system was subject to a punishing regime of neoliberalism known as the “Washington Consensus”. The mandate’s enforcers carried out decentralization en masse of an already fragmented healthcare system, outsourcing the national project to 32 subnational, under-resourced, uncoordinated health systems whose level of care differed dramatically from state to state. The uninsured population who came to depend on the balkanized institution were hardly in a better place when it comes to access and quality of care than they were before.

Then in the 90s and early 2000s, the federal government doubled down on decentralization, footing the bill of the decades of fragmentation through technocratic and “market-oriented” reforms. Things like per capita financing to persuade and assuage state governors, and a benefits package (CAUSES) that prioritized medical intervention over prevention—eschewing the, arguably, most critical phase of healthcare.

AMLO, through the IMSS-Bienestar program, sought to reverse this process without having to rebuild the structures from scratch. The program offers states the option to voluntarily enter into agreements to transfer to the federal program the full responsibility for providing healthcare to the uninsured, including infrastructure, personnel, and financial resources. And for all the strides the IMSS-Bienestar has made in centralization, it is still guilty of privileging specialists and hospitals at the expense of preventative community care—creating internal medical care deserts that exist in the shadows of the national institution.

Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Mexico City Photo: Jay Watts

The Federal Fix That Isn’t (Yet)

That’s all to say that, as Castañeda Prado points out, the existence of the IMSS-Bienestar is not a panacea. That’s partly because, though it has played a major role in the fight against this outbreak of measles, it can’t act in isolation.

“The responsibility for setting public policy lies with the different units,” he says. “Vaccination policy is under the unit called CeNSIA [Centro Nacional para la Salud Integral de la Infancia y la Adolescencia] epidemiological surveillance policy is set by the General Directorate of Epidemiology; and the responsibility for public health lies with the state health services and the health jurisdiction, and the provision of medical care lies with the various providers.”

Really making good on universal medical coverage comes down to a question of sufficient vision—that envisages what community care looks like in practice—and the necessary will to implement and defend that vision.

So the healthcare landscape is still fragmented. But, as Castañeda Prado assures, efforts are being made within the SNSP to coordinate and connect the dots. “They’re called health coordination centers for wellbeing—that aims to bridge the gap between the community’s healthcare needs and healthcare providers.” He sees “incentives, a budget, and metrics” as being three planks in that bridge to assure adherence to local, state, and national objectives, and also that the resources, the hospitals, infrastructure, medications, are all put to good and efficient use.

But really making good on universal medical coverage, he says, comes down to a question of sufficient vision—that envisages what community care looks like in practice—and the necessary will to implement and defend that vision. And ultimately that mandate has to come from the top down, and translated and transmitted through on-the-ground community work. Castañeda Prado concedes that community health isn’t always a winning platform electorally: “it doesn’t win votes; it’s not visible.”

Invisible or not, it’s indispensable. And it “isn’t carried out by doctors and nurses at the clinic,” as Castañeda Prado reiterates. “It’s done in the community, with health promoters, social workers, and local governments. And there really isn’t a strategy or policy in place to support that.”

Of course, this stymied interplay gets at the perennial tension between big government central planning and local, grassroots implementation. The two are mutually co-dependent, but, as we see in the case of the country’s response to the measles, so often either in conflict or operating in siloes, to the detriment of the most marginalized. If this current crisis is to serve as a “wake up call for policy makers” as Casillas Guerrero says it ought to, it’s a call that will have to be heard as much at the top as at the bottom, and heeded in concert.

Seth Garben is a writer, poet, musician, filmmaker, playwright, and activist/organizer based in the US and Mexico City. He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and a core team lead with immigrant rights group Danbury Unites for Immigrants. He composes and performs music in Mexico City and internationally as Goldy Head.

The post Failing the Stress Test: What the Measles Resurgence in Mexico Reveals About a Fragmented Health System appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

115
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)— On Tuesday, Acting President Delcy Rodríguez announced that a Venezuelan diplomatic delegation will depart for Washington this week. The move aims to resume formal diplomatic ties, as previously announced on February 3, marking one month since the unprecedented US military strikes on Venezuela and the criminal abduction of President Nicolás Maduro.

“This week, a delegation of diplomats will be leaving for Washington to begin this new stage of relations and political diplomatic dialogue between our government,” Acting President Rodríguez said during a meeting at Miraflores Palace with investors and business associations. “So welcome, thank you again, and I hope you return very soon so we can move forward with more concrete projects.”

During the meeting, the Chavista leader reaffirmed Venezuela’s willingness to establish a direct communication channel to facilitate a transparent institutional cooperation agenda. She further reiterated the state’s commitment to rebuilding strong bilateral political and commercial relations with the US to move past the current restrictive framework of illegal US sanctions.

OFAC issues General License 53
Shortly after the announcement, the US Department of the Treasury, through its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), issued General License 53. This license authorizes transactions linked to Venezuelan diplomatic missions, effectively permitting the operation of Venezuelan diplomatic representations in the US.

The first paragraph of the new OFAC license states: “All transactions prohibited by the Venezuela sanctions regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), that are related to the provision of goods or services in the United States to official missions of the government of Venezuela to the United States or to permanent missions of the government of Venezuela to international organizations in the United States (collectively, the ‘missions’), and payment for such goods or services, are authorized…”

Working meeting and delegation members
On Tuesday night, Rodríguez held a televised working session with members of the diplomatic delegation traveling to the US. While specific details about the full delegation were not provided, the meeting included several high-ranking officials.

Accompanying Rodríguez were Foreign Minister Yván Gil, Finance Minister Anabel Pereira, Vice President for Economy and Finance Calixto Ortega, Deputy Foreign Minister for North America and Europe Oliver Blanco, and Chargé d’Affaires Félix Plasencia, who will lead the Venezuelan diplomatic delegation to the US.

The battle for stolen assets
Geopolitical analysts suggest that the resumption of diplomatic ties could represent a turning point in the struggle to recover more than US $30 billion in Venezuelan assets frozen or seized by US imperialism since 2019. For years, the illegal “interim government” construct led by Juan Guaidó served as a legal artifice for Washington to block the Venezuelan people from accessing their own resources, including the CITGO corporation and over US $5 billion in gold held in the Bank of England.

With the US recognition of the Rodríguez administration, the pretext for maintaining these seizures collapses. Recovering control over these resources, including frozen bank accounts and seized subsidiaries, is considered essential for Venezuela’s economic recovery and social well-being after years of financial strangulation and imperialist looting.

Legal security versus OFAC licenses
During the session, Rodríguez emphasized the importance of moving away from the model of temporary OFAC licenses, such as those granted to companies like Chevron, toward a system of permanent legal security. She noted that a framework without sanctions is necessary to provide real certainty for investments in the short, medium, and long term.

She informed business leaders that intermittent licenses make long-term project planning impossible. Furthermore, she reaffirmed Venezuela’s commitment to building a stable and transparent economic cooperation agenda that mutually benefits both peoples. Rodríguez also highlighted the immense mineral potential of the country, which possesses some of the largest reserves of gold, bauxite, and diamonds on the planet, offering strategic opportunities for alliances under the principle of respect for Venezuelan sovereignty.

New leadership for Return to the Homeland Plan
On Tuesday, in a separate development, the National Assembly of Venezuela authorized Deputy Mervin Maldonado to assume the presidency of the Return to the Homeland (Vuelta a la Patria) Plan.

The national program was managed until recently by Camilla Saab, the wife of Alex Saab. Following a cabinet reshuffle on January 17, Alex Saab was replaced as industry minister by Luis Villegas and, according to reports not yet confirmed by authorities, is currently under house arrest.

Minister Cabello Urges Venezuelans Not to Fall for Provocations and to Trust Delcy Rodríguez amid Workers’ Protests

The president of the National Assembly, Jorge Rodríguez, stated that Maldonado “will be able to assume his position as head of the Great Mission Return to the Homeland, for which we wish him the greatest success.” The program, created by President Nicolás Maduro, is designed to protect and assist Venezuelan migrants who face vulnerable situations abroad, including xenophobia, exploitation, and racist persecution resulting from the economic crisis induced by illegal US sanctions.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

116
 
 

By Caitlin Johnstone – Mar 20, 2026

In their eyes the wars are never wrong, they’re only ever executed incorrectly. US military interventionism can never fail, it can only be failed.

Trump’s former national security advisor John Bolton has a tweet that’s got me absolutely fuming right now.

“In 2018–2019, I made the case for regime change in Iran as often as I could. Voices in Trump’s orbit often cited Iran’s capacity to close the Strait of Hormuz as a reason against regime change. Trump has been fully aware this is a possibility, and yet did not prepare,” Bolton posted.

Can you believe this shit? Dude’s like “Hey, Trump should have known this war would be hard because people tried to warn him not to listen to me!”

Motherfucker THIS WAS YOUR WAR. You were THE “bomb Iran” guy! You made it your entire personality for DECADES. Over the years I’ve used your name God knows how many times whenever I needed an example of a Beltway swamp monster who’s got a throbbing hard-on for war with Iran. Now you’ve finally got it and it’s going exactly as badly as everyone said it would, and you’re like “Yeah well he should’ve known better, people tried to warn him about the Strait of Hormuz”? Fuck you.

Got his regime change war and is still mad about it. 🤡 https://t.co/iCbOcDOzcA

— Josiah Lippincott (@jlippincott_) March 18, 2026

These professional warmongers never, ever learn from their errors. Many years after the Iraq invasion turned out to be a disaster, John Bolton was still out there telling the media he believed it was a “resounding success,” conceding only “mistakes that were made subsequently” to the ousting of Saddam Hussein.

They never admit they were wrong. They never admit that their war was a bad idea. They only ever acknowledge that it didn’t happen in exactly the way they imagined it happening in their minds. They live in this fantasy world where all their war agendas would unfold beautifully so long as they could personally control every molecule of matter involved in how it happens, completely ignoring that this is impossible and any war is always going to have an unfathomable number of moving parts you can’t control.

Trump ‘Postponed’ Strikes on Iranian Power Plants After Warnings of Regionwide Retaliations

In their eyes the wars are never wrong, they’re only ever executed incorrectly. US military interventionism can never fail, it can only be failed.

Bolton doesn’t even seem to have any idea what Trump could have done differently to stop Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz. I listened to an NPR interview the other day where he slammed Trump for not having “done the planning in advance” to prevent the Iranian blockade, but he never at any time outlined what Trump could have done to accomplish this. He just said there was “a huge hole in the planning” and that “they apparently didn’t take as seriously as they should have the potential to mine the Strait of Hormuz,” without ever saying what they could have done.

John Bolton jumping ship. JOHN BOLTON. https://t.co/z1LTJcJusJ

— Ali Ahmadi (@AliR_Ahmadi) March 14, 2026

He doesn’t know. He himself, Mister Iran War, had no plan for how to carry out this war without disastrous consequences for the US and its allies. He’s spent his entire blood-soaked career pushing for a war he never had any idea how to actually carry out.

These are the kinds of minds they have spearheading the US empire’s wars.

All the worst people are getting exactly what they want, and it turns out they don’t even want it, like Elon Musk tweeting “Whoever said ‘money can’t buy happiness’ really knew what they were talking about” last month. They’re getting everything they asked for and it’s making everyone miserable, and it’s not even making THEM happy.

The imperial status quo elevates the worst among us. The least wise. The least insightful. The least compassionate. The least deserving. The least qualified.

We need drastic revolutionary change, and we need it now.

(caitlinjohnstone.com)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

117
 
 

By Abdul Rahman – Mar 23, 2026

Rising energy prices and disruptions in global supply chains have shut down some industrial activities in Asian countries, like India, and forced governments to adopt emergency measures.

Iran warned it will completely shut down the Strait of Hormuz if its power plants are targeted in US-Israeli attacks. It also repeated that power plants in countries in the region that host US military bases will also be “legitimate” targets of its retaliation.

The statement was issued by Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya central military headquarters on Sunday, March 22, following US President Donald Trump’s threat on Saturday about targeting Iran’s power plants if it fails to open the Strait of Hormuz in the next 48 hours.

Iran announced previously that the strait is open for all except for the allies of the US and Israel.

“We are determined to respond to any threat at the same level as it creates in terms of deterrence. If you hit electricity, we hit electricity,” Khatam al-Anbiya claimed.

Earlier, Trump had threatened that “if Iran doesn’t fully open, without threat, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 hours from this exact point in time, the US will hit and obliterate their various power plants, starting with the biggest one first.”

However, in yet another social media post on Monday, Trump made a u-turn. He announced the postponement of the “strikes on Iranian power plants”, claiming his administration had a “very good and productive conversation” with Iran for the last two days which will continue in the coming days.

Iran has denied that it held any talks with the US. It claimed Trump’s statement was part of his efforts to lower global energy prices.

Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also asked the countries trying to intervene to end the war to approach Israel and the US instead, as they were the ones who initiated the war.

The US and Israel have already bombed Iran’s South Pars gas field and Kharq Island, in an attempt to hurt the country’s energy production and exports. Kharq Island is the main outlet of Iranian energy exports.

Iran, in retaliation, has attacked Israel’s Haifa refinery and several energy production centers in Qatar, Bahrain, and the UAE.

On Monday, Iran also warned that if its civilian infrastructure is targeted by the US and Israel it will completely shut down the regional communication channels.

Over 1,500 Iranians have been killed, including its head of state Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and several other top political and military leaders and over 20,000 have been injured in the US-Israeli attacks since February 28.

Scores of US security forces, Israelis, and some residents of the Persian Gulf countries have also been killed and thousands injured in Iranian retaliations.

US, ‘Israel’ Attack Gas Facilities at Iran’s South Pars Field

Global energy crisis
The closing of the Strait of Hormuz and attacks and counter attacks on energy production units in the region have already had a grievous impact on global energy prices, with prices of crude crossing USD 100 per barrel.

Due to higher prices and disruptions in supplies to various countries, particularly in Asia, governments have been forced to restrict domestic consumption and implement various emergency measures.

The war and blockade of the strait has disrupted the supply chain of various raw materials and market access, leading to sections of economic activities being shut down in various countries, causing unemployment.

In several countries, those that are mostly dependent on imported energy and the export of goods to West Asia, such as Bangladesh, the war is expected to cause a severe economic crisis.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), a Paris-based intergovernmental organization, the war on Iran has already caused an unprecedented energy crisis.

The effects of the present crisis are more severe than the combined effect of oil shocks in 1973, 1979, and the gas crisis due to the Ukraine war in 2022, claimed Fatih Birol, head of the IEA on Monday.

International community calls for end of the war
Meanwhile, there is a renewed global push to end the war on Iran, with anti-war demonstrations in different parts of the globe.

Members of the Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) held a protest at the US embassy in Manila on Monday, demanding the end of US warmongering in West Asia.

On Monday, China reiterated its calls for the end of the war and the start of negotiations to resolve any possible dispute.

If allowed to continue, the war will create a “vicious cycle” and may cause irreparable damage to the region claimed Lin Jian, spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Last week a Chinese envoy visited various countries in West Asia in an attempt to seek peace in the region.

(Peoples Dispatch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

118
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Plan B: the debate is clear, privileges or the peopleClaudia Sheinbaum reaffirmed that the Electoral Reform Plan B is centered on eliminating privileges, particularly those election officials who earn more than the President, and redirecting these resources toward the well-being of the people. She emphasized that her responsibility is to present the bill, and it will be up to the Senate to discuss and vote on it, making it clear that the crux of the debate is political: who is in favor of privileges and who is in favor of the people.

The right-wing copies what it previously criticizedPresident Claudia Sheinbaum questioned the National Action Party (PAN) for announcing that it would select its candidates for the 2027 elections through opinion polls, noting the inconsistency of those who for years criticized that method when it was used by Morena. She noted that comparisons and memes about this contradiction are circulating on social media, emphasizing that the right-wing is now adopting a mechanism that Morena promoted to democratize the internal life of political parties.

Femicide: real punishment and zero impunityThe Mexican government is promoting a General Law against femicide with penalties of up to 70 years in prison, nine gender-based criteria, and 21 aggravating factors. The proposed legislation standardizes the crime and mandates that every violent death of a woman be investigated as a femicide based on a gender perspective.

In addition, it guarantees comprehensive reparations for victims and families — including justice, medical and psychological care, legal counsel, and support for minors — and makes it clear that there will never again be impunity. No case may be downplayed or classified as suicide.

Diesel: zero abuses, the people will not overpayThe President accused gas station owners of raising the price of diesel and premium gasoline despite receiving tax incentives, stating there is no justification for diesel to reach prices such as 29.50 pesos (US$1.66), given that Special Tax on Production and Services incentives are in place precisely to prevent such an impact on the economy. Sheinbaum announced that this week the Ministry of Energy and Pemex will meet with the sector to curb these abuses and prevent the costs from being passed on to the public.


The post People’s Mañanera March 24 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

119
 
 

This article by Alma E. Muñoz and Emir Olivares originally appeared in the March 24, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Mexico City. Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo reiterated her call for the United States to eliminate or reduce tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum. She also stated that, like her administration, the U.S. government is advocating for stronger rules of origin.

“The United States has publicly stated its intention to strengthen rules of origin, as we have mentioned here, which means that if you are going to produce an auto part, most of your components must also be manufactured in Mexico, the United States, or Canada.”

President Sheinbaum said that lowering or eliminating tariffs “is part of the discussion that is happening right now… and there is progress, but we still don’t see it reflected in the facts.”

They still haven’t accepted?

“Yes, they accept it, but it’s not yet reflected in reality, even though it’s already a fact.”

In the document?

“Yes. There’s a provision in the declarations made by the United States that the component manufactured in the United States is deductible. Here, the automakers told us that they were having difficulty obtaining that deduction in the United States. And Secretary (Marcelo) Ebrard has requested this there, and in that respect, for example, there has been more progress.”

The post President Sheinbaum Insists US Eliminate Tariffs on Cars, Steel & Aluminum appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

120
 
 

On Monday, after condemning those who, from abroad, have incited workers of Venezuela to protest, the secretary general of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), Diosdado Cabello, called on the working class and the Venezuelan people in general not to fall into provocations and to trust in the capacities and work of the acting president Delcy Rodríguez.

“Venezuela has been subjected to the most perverse economic sanctions by the government of the United States, the European Union, and others who have believed they can sanction our country,” said Cabello. “However, those sanctions have had an effect on the homeland. Those who today go around, the widows and widowers of the Fourth Republic, speaking in the name of the workers, were the same ones who sold off workers’ social benefits. And they are there in the comfort of living abroad, calling to subvert order here in Venezuela.” Cabello spoke from Plaza Caracas, where he addressed, in downtown Caracas, a massive popular mobilization in support of the Bolivarian revolution and Venezuela’s socialist path.

He emphasized, before a sea of people, that “the working class is with the Bolivarian Revolution. They know it; so from outside, those who betrayed the working class come and send them, they send them to sacrifice once again. We invite them to come with us. Let’s demand that the sanctions against Venezuela cease, all united, and you will immediately see the results, not only in wages, but in the quality of life of Venezuelan men and women.”

Cabello’s message comes on the same day that right-wing sectors called for a mobilization to demand wage improvements. The activity of that sector is promoted by the National Trade Union Coalition. The route that the opposition planned to follow went from Parque Carabobo to Plaza Caracas.

The leader of the revolutionary socialist party, Diosdado Cabello specified that “some fall into the trap of those who want to deceive because they are the same ones who have always negotiated to leave workers out.”

In that context, he recalled that when on April 30, 2012, President Hugo Chávez enacted the Organic Labor Law of Workers (LOTTT), he settled a historic debt left by Fedecámaras, the CTV, and the governments of the Fourth Republic.

Later, Cabello stated: “Let us not fall into provocations of any kind; let us move forward; let us accompany our sister Delcy (Rodríguez), let us fully trust in the capacity, the work, and the consciousness of our comrade Delcy and the high political command that is with her.”

He added: “When Chavismo marches, it marches in peace, in calm. It is fundamental for the future to maintain revolutionary unity, of the parties of the Great Patriotic Pole, of the Bolivarian National Armed Force, and of the working class, of the men and women who do not rest day and night in any corner of the homeland. Let us maintain the unity of social movements.”

Cabello warned that the main task of the right wing today “is to try to divide us because they know that if they go to an election, we will win whatever elections come. They know that if they go to the streets, we will be in the streets. In any scenario, we must remain united like a rock.”

In response to these words, the public chanted the slogan: “They will not return.”

Lifting sanctions is key to promoting social well-beingGeneral secretary Cabello made it clear that “the struggles of the working class are the struggles of the Bolivarian Revolution. That is why we are in the streets… because we know and are very clear that once the sanctions against our country cease, this country will be in the same conditions as when Commander Hugo Chávez was here.”

In that context, he highlighted that they will continue promoting and strengthening housing construction, “a powerful health system, as we must have,” as well as that the nation will again have “the highest wage system in America. We will return to an education with everything.”

He recalled that what Venezuela has had to endure has been very difficult as a result of the blockade. In that sense, he provided as an example the events that transpired during the COVID-19 pandemic, when Venezuela could not initially import vaccines. Eventually, the Constitutional president, Nicolás Maduro, was able to facilitate the import of vaccines.

When mentioning both the Constitutional president and his wife, deputy to the National Assembly (AN), Cilia Flores, who since January 3 have been imprisoned in the United States after their abduction by US troops, Cabello sent the presidential couple a message of solidarity and revolutionary greeting.

“We know that sooner rather than later we will have them with us, in their same struggles, in the struggles for workers and for the humble people,” he stated while the crowd chanted in unison: “Solidarity and revolutionary greeting.”

After this greeting, Cabello resumed his speech: “We march together with the people demanding the end of sanctions.” In response, the people chanted: “The people, enraged, demand their rights!”

The main struggle is to move the country forwardIn his speech, Cabello asserted that the Venezuelan people have many struggles ahead, and one of the main ones is to move the country forward—to continue demonstrating that despite everything that imperialism and right-wing sectors have done, Venezuela remains standing.

Cabello noted that the nation has risen thanks to the efforts of Venezuelan workers, of students, peasants, fishermen, PDVSA workers, those in the electricity sector, teachers, professors, nurses, doctors—“who have set aside any personal situation to promote the future of the homeland and to provide our children a free, sovereign, and independent country.”

“Nothing will take us off our path; even if the march is slow, it is still a march,” he emphasized.

Cabello recalled that the infamous decree issued by former US President Barack Obama in March 2015, in which Obama alleged that Venezuela was an “unusual and extraordinary threat,” caused enormous harm to the people. That action by the US led to the more than 1,140 sanctions that have been imposed against Venezuela since.

Cabello recalled that despite the sanctions, “this people has resisted with heroism, with dignity, courage, and consciousness, and the people know that the path is the path of the Bolivarian Revolution; there is no other path.”

Unity above allFinally, Cabello reiterated the importance of the Venezuelan people remaining united, as the Liberator Simón Bolívar and the leader of the Bolivarian Revolution, Hugo Chávez, both emphasized.

In that sense, he recalled the call of “unity, struggle, battle, and victory” issued by President Chávez on December 8, 2012.

“He told us: unity, struggle, battle, and victory,” said Cabello. “Victories sometimes take time to arrive, but they always arrive for those who work for them with tenacity, with constancy, with clarity of purpose. Let us remain united and we will have victory assured.”

“Remember, brothers and sisters, that whatever happens—and I say this with full awareness—whatever happens, and under any circumstance, we will prevail; this people will always prevail,” he concluded.

The blockade against Venezuela continuesOn February 18, the US regime extended for an additional year the sanctions imposed on March 8, 2015, by then-president Barack Obama, through Executive Order 13692, which declared Venezuela a supposed “unusual and extraordinary threat.”

Since 2015, both Obama and the presidents who followed him—Donald Trump in his first (2017–2021) and second term (2025–), as well as Joe Biden (2021–2025)—have imposed more than a thousand sanctions.

On four occasions over the past two months, the acting president Delcy Rodríguez has requested that the Trump regime lift the blockade against Venezuela. The most recent call for sanctions relief was issued on Saturday, March 14, when she rejected a proposal by the president of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, regarding zero tariffs in all bilateral trade, due to the inequality that, she explained, is generated by US sanctions against Venezuela.

After explaining to President Petro why the zero-tariff initiative could not proceed, the acting president once again asked the occupant of the White House, Donald Trump, to completely lift the blockade that nation maintains against Venezuela.

“President Trump, it is the feeling of a people, but it is also the way in which Latin America, to which you have referred, can move forward together with balanced growth, where Venezuela also contributes to regional growth,” stated Delcy Rodríguez. “From here, Venezuela, in national unity, calls for the lifting of sanctions, for the blockade to cease, and for relations of cooperation, friendship, joint work, and shared work to prevail, in relations of equality and respect.”

With this appeal, it is the fourth time that the acting president has urged Trump, since late February, to lift sanctions against Venezuela. On February 26, 2026, 48 hours after Donald Trump referred to Venezuela as a “new partner and friend,” acting president Delcy Rodríguez addressed a message to the US president requesting that he end the blockade and sanctions against the nation. That was the first call.

A day later, on February 27, the acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, again demanded an end to the economic blockade imposed by the US, noting that it has significantly affected the local economy due to restrictions on the hydrocarbon sector.

On March 2, Rodríguez once again requested that the US president lift the blockade and the illegal unilateral coercive measures (euphemistically referred to as “sanctions”) that the US maintains against Venezuela.

“We have told President Trump, who considers us his ‘friends,’ his ‘partners’—we have told him that we welcome and acknowledge that consideration, but … the blockade against Venezuela must end now, the sanctions against Venezuela must be lifted; the Venezuelan people deserve it,” she emphasized during a meeting on Monday, March 2, at the Félix Lalito Velásquez Sports Complex in Sucre.

Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in by the National Assembly as acting president on January 5 in accordance with the decision issued two days earlier by the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, which appointed her to fulfill that responsibility following the criminal abduction of the Constitutional head of state, Nicolás Maduro.

The US Keeps Openly Admitting It Deliberately Caused The Iran Protests

(Diario VEA) by Yuleidys Hernández Toledo

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

121
 
 

The acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, sent her condolences to the families of members of Colombia’s National Army following the crash of a Colombian Air Force plane shortly after taking off from the Puerto Leguízamo Airport in the department of Putumayo, Colombia.

“Venezuela expresses its sincere condolences to the families of the members of the National Army and of the crew of the Colombian Aerospace Force who died in this tragic accident,” stated the acting president. “In these moments of uncertainty and pain, our prayers go with the injured, offering wishes for their prompt and full recovery.”

The Lockheed Martin Hercules C-130 aircraft was carrying troops from Colombia’s Public Force on board.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro, through social media, indicated that “so far, there are 77 injured in the hospital, one dead, and 43 people whose condition is yet to be determined.” The cause of the Hercules plane crash is still unknown.

Later, the Colombian president specified that 83 soldiers survived the crash and that the inhabitants of Putumayo helped them, crossing the runway and assisting them, which he praised.

“It is the people of Putumayo who saved them from death—they went all the way to the airport runway and brought water and love to the young men,” wrote President Petro. “This is how a homeland is built. I thank the fathers and mothers who ran the distance to the crashed Hercules aircraft to save the children of other mothers and fathers; I thank the soldiers who were there and ran to save the lives of their comrades—this is a beautiful proof of love and solidarity. I kneel before you. Let us aim for the maximum, the lowest number of lives lost… life is the priority of society and the state.”

Below is an unofficial translation of the full text of the communiqué of the Venezuelan government:

The acting president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez Gómez, on behalf of the Government and the Venezuelan people, expresses her deepest solidarity and sorrow to the people and Government of the Republic of Colombia following the unfortunate air accident that occurred this Monday, March 23, 2026, in Puerto Leguízamo, in the department of Putumayo.

Venezuela expresses its sincere condolences to the families of the members of the National Army and the crew of the Colombian Aerospace Force who died in this tragic accident. In these moments of uncertainty and pain, our prayers accompany the injured, offering wishes for their prompt and full recovery.

The Venezuelan people join the mourning that today engulfs the Colombian nation, reaffirming the value of life and the integrity of those who serve their homeland with honor.

Venezuela’s Delcy Rodríguez and Colombia’s Gustavo Petro to Meet Amid Shifting Regional Dynamics

(Últimas Noticias) by Aura Torrealba

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

122
 
 

At the General Cemetery of the South in Caracas, the acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, inaugurated a monument to the heroes who fell on January 3, 2026,

The monument, built with marble and granite pieces, immortalizes the bravery of the men and women who lost their lives in defense of the homeland.

Acting President Rodríguez also reported on the restoration of the tribute to the martyrs of El Caracazo of February 27, 1989, when thousands of Venezuelans were gunned down by the military during protests against the neoliberal austerity measures of President Carlos Andrés Pérez.

The acting president highlighted the short time required to restore the cemetery projects thanks to the joint and coordinated action between the national, regional, and local governments.

“I truly acknowledge that we are able to be delivering this work that in just 6 months underwent a major intervention,” stated Acting President Rodríguez.

Transparency website launchedLikewise, on Monday, the Ministry of Finance launched the Transparencia Soberana web portal to track, in real time, the assets entering the nation from oil sales and the disbursement of these funds.

In January, the acting president had stated that the Chavista government would keep the people informed on this matter in order to ensure transparency.

At that time, Rodríguez announced the creation of two strategic sovereign funds: one for Social Protection and another for National Infrastructure. Regarding the first, the official explained that its purpose is to channel revenue derived from hydrocarbon production directly toward improving wages and financing fundamental programs in health, food, education, and housing.

The web portal reports that the resources collected in the month of March were allocated to the Social Protection Fund and were fully disbursed to strengthen workers’ comprehensive minimum income.

With respect to the second fund, aimed at optimizing public services such as electricity, water, gas, and road infrastructure, the portal has not yet recorded financial movements to date.

Venezuela After January 3: A Nation Standing in the Storm

(LaIguana.tv)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

123
 
 

This article by Ángel Villegas originally appeared in the March 24, 2026 edition of Rebelión.  The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project*.*

Author’s note: Tehuacán is a key economic engine in the state of Puebla, in Mexico, standing out mainly in the poultry, textile (especially denim) and beverage sectors.

The history of the poultry industry in Tehuacán began in the mid-twentieth century; it evolved from being a craft activity, in which several families raised birds in the yards of their houses taking advantage of the dry, temperate climate and its location at an ideal altitude with optimal conditions to reduce respiratory diseases in birds compared to coastal areas.

Furthermore, Tehuacán is ideally located as a strategic midpoint between the Port of Veracruz, the entry point for grain, and Mexico City, the main market. Among the pioneering and most influential families who professionalized the sector are the García de la Cadena and Romero families, followed by the Patjane and Célis families, who were instrumental in developing the necessary infrastructure for this industrial branch.

Doña Maria Socorro Romero Sánchez

When talking about poultry farming in Tehuacán, it is necessary to mention Doña Socorro Romero Sánchez, known as La Señorita, a visionary woman who not only expanded the farms, but also integrated the process: incubation, feed manufacturing and distribution, until she turned the sector into a commercial giant that offers the national market eggs, broiler chickens, extending her investments to pig farming and the real estate and hotel sectors.

Today, the companies Socorro Romero Sánchez (SRS), El Calvario, and Productos Agropecuarios de Tehuacán (PATSA) have developed sanitation protocols, produce their own vaccines, established rail routes to bring sorghum and corn from the Bajío region and the United States, and have automated egg collection systems and ambient temperature control on their farms, among other advancements that have significantly boosted their productivity and generated substantial profits from jobs. Impressive, isn’t it?

Legend has it that the SRS company began in the 1950s with just 500 chickens, and it has been reported in the media that upon Doña Socorro’s death at the age of 93 in 2009, she left a fortune estimated at over $600 million, including farms, hotels, real estate, and cash—a considerable sum that has sparked a tremendous family feud over one of Mexico’s largest estates. One faction of the family accuses the Célis Romero family of forging the signature on the will, claiming that Doña Socorro Romero, shortly before her death, lacked the physical and mental capacity to express her wishes.

Today, Miguel Ángel Célis Romero, one of the named heirs, is in jail for alleged aggravated extortion against business partners and family members. Adding to the protracted legal battle are accusations of influence peddling, media manipulation, and document forgery. One faction of the family is fighting to have the will annulled in order to recover “what is rightfully theirs,” while the other is fighting to get out of prison and maintain control of the company. In families formed under bourgeois ideology, all emotional and blood ties are lost; they are worth absolutely nothing compared to cold economic interests, regardless of whether the loot is large or small.

January astro-turfed protest in Tehuacán for the release of Miguel Ángel Celis Romero, an SRS heir.

On January 26, 2026, hundreds of workers from that company took to the main streets of Tehuacán to march toward the House of Justice, the headquarters of the State Attorney General’s Office, to demand “a fair trial and the release” of their imprisoned boss. There are testimonies from the workers alleging that they were pressured and manipulated into defending interests not only unrelated to, but antagonistic to, their own, under the false pretense that “their jobs were in danger.”

On February 21st, a digital news outlet in Tehuacán broadcast live the protest of dozens of workers outside the SRS company demanding attention to their unjust dismissal. Would any worker be interested in being exploited by either side of the feuding family? In my opinion, whether they want to bleed you dry or throw you out on the street, both vampires are the same.

Now, which of the two sides of the family has the right to keep the fortune? I believe NEITHER! For over 100 years, the science of political economy has solved the mystery of how capital reproduces itself, and since then it has been known that it does so by extracting surplus value—that is, through unpaid surplus labor from the working class. Strictly speaking, where did the $600 million in dispute come from? The answer is clear, unequivocal, and compelling: from the exploitation of the labor of thousands of workers who have dedicated their lives to that company in exchange for meager wages, humiliation, union manipulation, and all kinds of pressure to work in the worst conditions, obeying without question under threat of pay cuts or being thrown out on the street. It is the working class that, essentially, made possible the miracle of transforming the first 500 chickens into more than $600 million.

The famous German playwright, Bertolt Brecht, was able to formulate it with great precision in his poem entitled Questions From a Worker Who Reads:

Who built Thebes of the 7 gates ?  
In the books you will read the names of kings.  
Did the kings haul up the lumps of rock ?  
  
And Babylon, many times demolished,  
Who raised it up so many times ?  
  
In what houses of gold glittering Lima did its builders live ?  
Where, the evening that the Great Wall of China was finished, did the masons go?  
  
Great Rome is full of triumphal arches.  
Who erected them ?  
  
Over whom did the Caesars triumph ?  
Had Byzantium, much praised in song, only palaces for its inhabitants ?  
  
Even in fabled Atlantis, the night that the ocean engulfed it,  
The drowning still cried out for their slaves.  
  
The young Alexander conquered India.  
Was he alone ?  
  
Caesar defeated the Gauls.  
Did he not even have a cook with him ?  
  
Philip of Spain wept when his armada went down.  
Was he the only one to weep ?  
  
Frederick the 2nd won the 7 Years War.  
Who else won it ?  
  
Every page a victory.  
Who cooked the feast for the victors ?  
  
Every 10 years a great man.  
Who paid the bill ?  
  
So many reports.  
  
So many questions.

Let me ask you one more question: who built the powerful economic empire that the poultry industry represents in Tehuacán? Was it solely the entrepreneurial intelligence of its founder? Obviously not. No one can create such a fortune on their own; they can only concentrate it, and in fact, that’s what happens in capitalism. In Mexico, we have men who amass great fortunes and are among the richest in the world. And every effort is made to make us believe that they are rich only because of their intelligence and business acumen. But that’s false. There’s a big difference between creating and accumulating wealth. Wealth is created by wage labor exploited by capital and is accumulated by the owner of the means of production. What’s fair is that this wealth shouldn’t be concentrated in a few hands, but rather distributed among all those who produce it.

The workers, not only those of the SRS company, must shake off the exploitation and the corrupt tutelage of the protection unions and not let themselves be manipulated; they must form their own independent organization to be in a position to march and demand, indeed, “the share that corresponds to them” of the social wealth that they themselves have produced.

The post Who Produces Social Wealth & Who Concentrates It? appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

124
 
 

This column by Arturo Huerta González originally appeared in the March 24, 2026 issue of La Jornada de Oriente, the Puebla edition of La Jornada*, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.* The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project*.*

On March 19, 2026, at the 89th Banking Convention, the Governor of the Bank of Mexico (Banxico) stated that, “despite the complex external environment [referring to the Middle East war], Mexico has a solid financial system and a foundation of stability that allows it to face risks and support economic growth,” reflecting an optimistic stance. However, neither high interest rates, exchange rate stability, high bank profits, nor prevailing budget cuts will prevent the rise in international gasoline, gas, and fertilizer prices from impacting the national economy. Mexico will see increased prices for all its imports, and lacking both the productive capacity and the economic policy management necessary to advance import substitution to confront these external shocks, the greater economic dynamism expected by attendees of the Banking Convention will not materialize. On the contrary, the recessionary and inflationary context will intensify, exacerbating current problems.

The President of the Mexican Banking Association, speaking at the event, stated that “in 2025, private banks as a whole earned profits of 300 billion pesos, representing approximately 1% of GDP.” It should be noted that these profits exceeded GDP growth that year by 0.8%. This implies that these profits were generated by high bank interest rates, which reduced the spending and investment capacity of the government, businesses, and heavily indebted households. Despite this, the president claimed that the banking sector drives economic activity. If this were true, economic growth would be significantly higher than the average annual growth rate of 0.8% recorded from 2018 to 2025.

The president of the bankers’ association said that “insecurity …is one of the main reasons why the economy isn’t growing at adequate levels.” He’s wrong in his diagnosis. If there is insecurity, it’s precisely because of the unemployment and poverty caused by the lack of growth and job creation the country is facing, and the banking sector bears a great deal of responsibility for this, due to the high interest rates and fees it charges on loans.

The banking sector is optimistic about growth in 2026 and that there will be positive results in the USMCA negotiations. They haven’t taken into account that the US wants to buy more from them and sell less to them in order to reduce its trade deficit with Mexico. They’re after oil, the electricity industry, and rare earth minerals, and Mexico, in its attempt to maintain the USMCA, will end up subservient to them, and we will lose out.

In response to the bankers’ leader’s concern that “many people live below the poverty line, ” he said that “for us, the most important mission is to work on financial inclusion.” He believes that this would reduce poverty. However, financial inclusion only benefits the banks and does not translate into greater job creation and higher wages to reduce poverty.

Bankers indicated they are ready to “increase credit as a proportion of GDP to 45 percent by 2030” and that they have “a very clear mission to boost the country’s economic growth.” It should be noted that this expansion of credit will not occur without growth conditions that guarantee loan repayment, and there are no prospects that, with current economic policies, the economy will grow enough to lead businesses to demand loans and banks to offer them. Given the low economic growth and the uncertainty surrounding the USMCA, as well as the consequences of the war in the Middle East, there are no investment decisions, nor is there any demand for or supply of credit.

At the event, the Finance Secretary stated that Mexico has a solid economic foundation despite international uncertainty and that the economy will grow between 1.8 and 2.8%, adding that “one of the pillars of the economy’s strength has been the responsible management of public finances, which allows the main international rating agencies to maintain the country’s investment grade debt rating.” It appears that public finances are being managed responsibly by rating agencies, which are agents of the international financial sector, while public finances are not being used responsibly to promote economic growth and employment.

Mexico lacks the productive conditions and economic policy management necessary to resume growth or to cope with the negative impacts resulting from the rise in international prices of gasoline, gas, fertilizers, and food; therefore, the economy will not grow as the government expects .

The post Banks Profit at the Expense of Undermining Economic Growth appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

125
 
 

This article by Gerardo Hernández originally appeared in the March 23, 2026 edition of El Economista.

The constitutional reform to reduce the working day left the door open for employers and workers to agree on 56-hour weeks, by adding the new limits on overtime and triple hours, said Fernando Yllanes Almanza, managing partner of Consulting at the firm Yllanes Ramos.

“Today we have the same definition, overtime can only be carried out in extraordinary circumstances and even then there is the capacity to have it structurally because we do not have a legal prohibition or the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare (STPS) does not sanction for it,” he pointed out.

During the Assembly of the Association of Human Resources of the Petroleum Industry (ARHIP), the labour lawyer explained that once the 40-hour work week is implemented, the workday may be longer as long as the new limits established are not exceeded and the corresponding payment is made.

This wouldn’t break with either the spirit of the reform or the position of the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (STPS), opined Fernando Yllanes Almanza. “It’s part of how the authorities will carry out inspections; they’re presenting it as an economic victory for workers. It should be part of our planning objectives to define when people will earn more money because it’s considered overtime. If we do it the other way around, and what we try to do is manipulate the system to pay less per overtime hour, then we’ll run into problems.”

The shortage of skilled labour and the operational costs of implementing the reform make this scenario possible: workdays exceeding 40 hours in a structured manner, provided it is agreed with the workers and the corresponding payment is made.

While it’s necessary to analyze each case individually, the other side of the coin is that the workers themselves are happy to have overtime to earn more money. “That has been the government’s rallying cry; the Secretary of Labour himself, when he announced (the reform), said, ‘People are going to be better off, they’re going to earn more. Before, they only earned 9 hours, now they’re going to earn 16.’ The Labour Ministry’s rallying cry is that people are going to earn more money,” he added.

The work schedule reform enacted this month amended the Constitution to establish a limit of 40 hours per week, with a gradual transition starting on January 1, 2027. Subsequently, two hours will be reduced annually on the first day of each year until the new weekly limit is reached, which will occur in 2030.

The amendments to the Magna Carta also include a new limit on overtime, which will increase from 9 to 12 hours allowed per week, and puts a cap on so-called ‘triple hours’, which cannot exceed 4 hours in the weekly count.

40-hour Workweek: Now a Roadmap for Preparation

Although changes to the Federal Labour Law (LFT) are still pending, the constitutional reform already offers a compass for companies to begin preparing for the transition.

“The secondary reform will no longer make changes to that, and that is the legal certainty we can use to start organizing operations and plans, because otherwise, if we wait for the legal reform, there are still challenges we have to overcome,” said Fernando Yllanes Almanza.

With the provisions already contained in the Constitution, the specialist pointed out, companies can begin now with their work plans for the implementation of the new legal limits.

The post Mexico’s Workweek Reform Leaves Door Open to 56 Hour Workweeks appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›