Latin American Publications!

122 readers
14 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
951
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Wellbeing with Record Budget

In 2026, 1 trillion pesos (US$57.96 billion) is being directly allocated to Wellbeing Programs. The senior citizen pension/subsidy, now constitutionally enshrined, has increased to 6,400 pesos (US$371) every two months, along with scholarships/stipends and social assistance.

In addition, 900 billion pesos (US$52.16 billion) are being allocated to investment in roads, water, and hospitals. With this, investment will grow 2% of GDP in 2026 and reach 5.9 trillion pesos (US$340 billion) for 2030.

Record Investment for Development 2026-2030

The Ministry of Finance reported that President Claudia Sheinbaum’s government will promote public and mixed investment to the tune of 5.6 trillion pesos (US$320 billion) to fulfill the 100 presidential commitments, incorporating programs with private investment.

The plan includes 1,500 projects, with priority on energy, in addition to train lines, highways, ports, healthcare, and water. Investment in Pemex in 2025 is already showing positive results internationally.

Mexico with Dignity and Sovereignty Internationally

Sheinbaum explained that Mexico’s foreign policy is guided by respect, equality, and non-intervention. She noted that, even amid tensions with the United States, mutual respect and joint work have prevailed.

In that framework, Mexico will send humanitarian aid to Cuba transparently and without this implying confrontation. The President reiterated that Mexico can only mediate if the parties involved request it and that the country’s foreign policy has a clear objective: peace, sovereignty, and solidarity among peoples.

Electoral Reform in February

The President reaffirmed that there will indeed be an electoral reform, to be sent to Congress in February, with the aim of strengthening oversight and making the use of public financing transparent, in addition to reducing such spending. Sheinbaum reiterated that there is an alliance between Morena and its allies and Congress will define discussion and approval timelines.


The post People’s Mañanera February 3 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

952
 
 

This article by Arturo Rivero was originally published by Lafuentelaboral on February 1, 2026.

The Mexican Senate proposal to pay overtime up to triple seeks to curb abuse of extended days; however, for thousands of Mexican workers, the problem is not just in how much overtime will be paid, but in how overtime hours are imposed.

“Here they don’t ask you if you want to stay. They tell you: either you stay or tomorrow you don’t come back”, Jose, a line operator in an industrial plant in the north of the country, relates. His shift officially ends at 5 p.m., but he often leaves after 10 p.m. Overtime is paid, when paid at all, as “support” or “bonus”, outside of payroll.

Like him, dozens of consulted workers agree on a pattern: overtime is not negotiated, it is ordered and refusing it usually results in veiled threats, shift changes, pay cuts or disguised firings.

The reform being discussed in the Senate of the Republic establishes that extraordinary work must be voluntary, with a limit of 12 hours per week and additional payments of up to 200% when these limits are exceeded. But in the workplace, a “voluntary” agreement is fragile.

“On paper it sounds good, but in practice the worker is alone in front of the boss,” says Ana, an administrative employee in a service company.

“If you say no, they call you conflictive. Nobody wants to be blacklisted,” he concludes.

The post Mexico’s Proposed Workweek Law Promises Triple Overtime, but Fear Rules the Workplace appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

953
 
 

This article by Enrique Méndez y Fernando Camacho originally appeared in the February 3, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Deputies from Morena and the Labor Party (PT) yesterday formed a Mexico-Cuba brotherhood group, in a decision that, explained legislator María Magdalena Rosales, was made because the coordinator of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), Rubén Moreira, has refused to establish a friendship entity with that country.

“We have insisted on this a thousand times. The moment is complex for both nations” due to Donald Trump’s policies, the congresswoman declared at the meeting where 26 legislators joined the group.

The deputy coordinator of the parliamentary group, Dolores Padierna Luna, announced that tomorrow, Wednesday, they will hold a dialogue with the new Cuban ambassador to Mexico, Eugenio Martínez Enríquez.

At the meeting, deputies proposed both promoting the removal of Moreira as president of the friendship group, and carrying out parallel work, which includes – as suggested by José Narro – promoting citizen action in favor of humanitarian aid, as well as inviting the diplomat to a solidarity meeting with Cuba.

Padierna Luna explained that the sisterhood group is constituted as “a parliamentary space, which is not only a mechanism for legislative cooperation, but an ethical, historical and political affirmation of Mexico’s commitment to the principles that have guided our foreign policy.”

He recalled that the two countries share a deep relationship, which has withstood adverse circumstances, external pressures and changes in the international order, and that it is not explained only by geographical proximity or formal diplomatic ties, but, above all, “by a community of values ​​and a shared history of dignity and resistance.”

Therefore, he noted that the sisterhood group “aims to strengthen dialogue and contribute to humanitarian cooperation in strategic areas.” He emphasized that “solidarity is not a rhetorical gesture, nor is it about giving what is left over, but about sharing what one has.”

The legislator indicated that, for humanitarian reasons, Mexico must continue and strengthen its actions of cooperation and friendship with Cuba.

“Access to energy is not a luxury: it is a basic condition to guarantee health services, education, water supply, food production and the functioning of daily life.”

“We do not condone unilateral actions by neo-imperialism that seek to punish sovereign countries and turn hunger, energy, and the suffering of people into weapons of pressure,” he elaborated.

Narro reported that a virtual meeting of students who studied medicine in Cuba with the Cuban ambassador is also being prepared, and Padierna proposed a visit to the island between April and May.

The post Morena and Workers Party Deputies Create Mexico-Cuba Sisterhood Group appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

954
 
 

US Americans and Mexicans have something in common when it comes to migration. People from the US are the largest immigrant population in Mexico, and Mexicans are the largest immigrant population in the US.

US citizens who move to Mexico — the number has more than tripled over the last 20 years and is now over one million — leave home for similar reasons as Mexicans. Economics. A dollar goes farther in Mexico. Climate change. Fires, hurricanes and floods also propel people out of California, Texas and beyond. Violence. Sending a kid to school or shopping at Walmart could get you shot. Culture. Great vibe!

In the US, when talking about US migrants living in Mexico, we call them “expats.” No one condemns them for having moved or questions their motives. But when talking about Mexican migrants, we hear them called “illegals,” “criminals and rapists” and “job stealers.” The least derogatory terms are “undocumented” or “migrant,” and even those have become negative stereotypes. How come they too are not “expats”? Is this a matter of class, since US migrants tend to have a higher income? Is being working class a reason to be treated as someone with less value and fewer rights?

Diego Torres was a migrant, and he became an outspoken advocate for migrants in both Mexico and the US — yes, Central Americans and others crossing Mexico’s border too, because he believes that regardless of where people are from or where they now live, whether they are expats or undocumented, it’s all the same — they deserve to be treated with dignity and to live in peace.

He believes that regardless of where people are from or where they now live, whether they are expats or undocumented, it’s all the same — they deserve to be treated with dignity and to live in peace.

Mexico City native Diego Alfredo Torres Rosete lived in the US as an undocumented immigrant for 20 years. Now back in Mexico City, he’s a Morena activist. He founded the Frente Amplio de Mexicanos en el Exterior (Broad Front of Mexicans Abroad), which defends and serves the needs of all migrants. Click here to join one of the Frente’s 2026 Working Groups.

Like many Mexicans, you’ve lived several times in the US. What caused your back-and-forth?

Mexico had a recession in 1999. That was the first time I went to the US; I needed to earn money not just for me, but for my parents and family. After four years, I returned home, but the Mexican economy hadn’t improved, so I crossed back to the US again. Like other migrants, I had the dream that in the US, if you worked hard, you could do whatever you wanted and you could make it. I felt American!

After a 2010 arrest for drunk driving, ICE agents showed up. At that time they were not intimidating; they were friendly and helpful. They told me, “Don’t worry, just sign this document and go back to Mexico and then come back.” They didn’t deport me like they would now. I went to Mexico City on my own and built a thriving tool business. But after criminals held a gun to my head and stole everything, I returned to the US; this time, because of the violence.

In 2015, ICE detained me again. Back again to Mexico! I was fortunate that Marta García Alvarado offered me a job with Morena’s Secretariat for Mexicans Abroad and International Policy, which she led. She herself lives in both Los Angeles and Mexico.

Marta García Alvarado (right) with then Ambassador of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to Mexico, Francisco Arias Cárdenas (left) Photo: Jay Watts

I’m 53. I spent 20 years in the US, most of my adult life; my best friends are still in the US, and I miss them. But today, I can’t even think of returning. The US was always a bully — now it’s a criminal!

Once a Mexican citizen is in the US, what is Mexico’s responsibility to them?

Many migrants confuse embassies with consulates. Embassies only handle country-to-country diplomacy, while consulates serve Mexicans abroad — but only those with legal documents. They supply basic information about your rights, but they don’t help fix your papers or offer legal or financial aid. Some consul staff have been corrupt, treating their jobs like a personal business. They would even sell appointments!

Under president Sheinbaum, we see some reforms — making information easier to find and making appointments online. But it’s not enough.

CCA Detention Center, San Diego. Photo: The San Diego Immigrant Rights Consortium

Is the situation of Mexican migrants different from people from other places?

During a two-month stay in a San Diego detention center in 2015, I talked with migrants from all over the world. They had fled their countries because of racism, lack of economic opportunity and violence. That’s why Mexicans migrated too — but the difference is that Mexico is a rich country.

We see a plentiful banquet at home, but we’re not allowed to eat it; we have to eat a neighbor’s leftovers!

In 2022, you founded the Frente Amplio de Mexicanos/as y Migrantes. Why?

I believe in Morena’s principles. But I founded the Frente when I saw the Morena party moving in the wrong direction — its only goal had become to win elections, and that’s it.

As a migrant myself, I was upset at the inhumane way we treated migrants in Mexico. The Frente believes that Mexico should be at the forefront of the battle for better treatment of migrants wherever they are, and so we needed to speak up about our own country’s unjust policies.

Deputy Roselia Suárez with Deputy Manuel Vazquez Arellano

Please describe the Frente’s 2025 project, which focused on Mexican migrants in North America.

The project grew out of my own experiences. I partnered with Diputada Roselia Suarez, a Mexican congresswoman and migrant living in Chicago. We brought together migrant organizations, individuals and allies to discuss, document and propose solutions to the problems migrants face in the US, Canada and Mexico.

There were 14 issue-based working groups on child labor, gender-based violence, temporary workers, the USMCA and more.

Ridiculously long line of Mexican citizens lining up to vote in the Mexican presidential election in July, 2024 outside the San Diego consulate. Photo: Martin Eder

For example, in discussing migration, we came up with a proposal to focus on high emigration communities to strengthen those local economies so no one would have to leave. A development fund linking remittances and tax payments from undocumented workers — money earned by the migrants themselves — could be used for local investments and reintegration programs. The Working Group on electoral reform proposed ways to raise the level of participation from citizens living abroad.

These included simplifying voter registration rules and providing information not just in Spanish but in indigenous languages — and English! since second- and third-generation Mexicans may not understand Spanish. We also discussed the need for a migrant electoral district, which would add to Congress thirty deputado/a seats and nine senators for Mexicans living abroad.

At the end of 2025, I published a comprehensive report documenting the issues identified and the recommendations of the Working Groups as a resource for everyone concerned about migrants. During the year, I distributed a monthly bulletin, Hablemos de Migración, or Let’s Talk about Migration.

Several Mexican Congress people live abroad. What role can they play?

As a result of an affirmative action policy that was pushed by Marta Garcia in 2019, five Mexicans who live abroad must be chosen to serve as representatives in Congress. Roselia Suarez, who I work with closely, is one of them. They don’t have much formal power, but they can bring a migrant lens to any issue. Take small business development, for example. Many returnees to Mexico face administrative barriers to bringing their businesses to Mexico; for instance, they aren’t allowed to import their commercial equipment. Instead of building Mexico’s economy, they fall back to being underemployed.

No one talks about migrants, but they are Mexicans too, most of them Mexican citizens. Probably half the Mexican population has lived or has family living in the US, and the Mexican government should be serving them. They shouldn’t treat those living abroad as just a source of remittance revenue.

What will the Frente’s migrant project do in 2026?

Strengthening Mexico’s own economy is the first step to changing the treatment of migrants in the US and Canada, so I support president Sheinbaum’s Plan Mexico. We have steps we can take — how about a boycott of US imports like Coca-Cola? Mexico has its own unhealthy drinks, ha ha! The US needs Mexican workers — if migration slows down, they’ll have to offer better terms.

In 2026, we will deepen our ties with migrant communities and move our proposals forward. It’s been an uphill struggle getting attention for migrant issues, and when work goes slowly, people quit. But we can’t let the system win. I’ve learned that I have to keep talking even if people aren’t listening and keep advocating for those left out. Often a tiny minority later becomes the majority — isn’t that the lesson of Morena? So, we’ll keep going.

Meizhu Lui’s experiences as the daughter of Chinese immigrants and as a single mom led her to focus on addressing inequalities based on race, gender, and immigration status. A hospital kitchen worker, she was elected president of her AFSCME local. She coordinated the national Closing the Racial Wealth Gap Initiative, and co-authored The Color of Wealth: The Story Behind the U.S. Racial Wealth Divide. Liberation Road, a socialist organization, has been her political home.


The post A Migrant by Any Other Name is a Migrant appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

955
 
 

This article by Néstor Jiménez, Alonso Urrutia and Nayelli Ramírez originally appeared in the February 3, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

The wait was long, but yesterday it finally ended. The Insurgent Train took 4,228 days – since 2014 – to complete its journey from the Toluca metropolitan area to the Observatorio Metro station in Mexico City.

President Claudia Sheinbaum opted for a simple and quick ceremonial act to cut the inaugural ribbon and witness the “historic day”.

Without delay, together with the head of government, Clara Brugada, and the governor of the State of Mexico, Delfina Gómez, he made the first tour of the last two stations that were opened to the public in the afternoon: Vasco de Quiroga and Observatorio.

After the morning press conference, which was held yesterday at the headquarters of the National Film Archive, in the Fourth Section of Chapultepec, the President rushed to lead the first trip on this stretch.

She only paused for a few minutes to enjoy the traditional tamales for Candlemas Day, which were already ready for all the guests, including federal and city officials, and representatives of the companies that participated in the project.

Following this, with a smile that showed satisfaction at finishing a project that took almost 12 years to materialize, she approached El Insurgente at the Vasco de Quiroga station, a symbolic point, since it was not part of the project made by the then government of the PRI member Enrique Peña Nieto.

With its carriages completely full of guests and reporters, the train headed to Observatorio, and then back to Santa Fe. The route, which usually requires navigating heavy traffic to reach one of the country’s main economic and business districts, took only a few minutes.

As she passed by, some people leaned out of their windows to wave. From the Army Mounted and Honor Guard facilities, the troops, most of them on horseback, stopped to give a military salute as the President advanced.

The service for the public began at 4 p.m., but from early in the morning, and given the uncertainty of when they could enter, dozens of people, many coming from as far away as Hidalgo or Oaxaca, arrived at the inauguration with the intention of also making the trip; several decided to wait for hours until the doors opened.

Others came to express their support for the president and “just to meet her,” as Mr. Lucio Romero, from Nezahualcóyotl, said.

Residents of nearby neighborhoods, such as Molino Santo Domingo, arrived as early as 9 a.m., but upon learning that the service would not yet be available, they postponed their trip for another day.

Outside the Observatorio station, hundreds of people waited patiently to enter. As the clock approached 4 p.m., they chanted the countdown: “five, four, three, two, one,” as the doors opened amid cheers and shouts of “Long live Mexico!”

The Collective Transportation System (STC) Metro deployed brigades, with groups of between five and 10 people, to assist users of the Observatorio terminal of line 1, and to guide those heading to El Insurgente.

The post “Historic Day” – Final Section of El Insurgente Train Inaugurated appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

956
 
 

This editorial by José Romero originally appeared in the February 3, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. The views expressed in this article are the authors’* own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project.*

For decades, Mexico maintained a foreign policy that, with all its nuances and contradictions, retained a singular characteristic: the defense of sovereignty as an operational principle, not as a rhetorical slogan. This tradition survived regime changes, ideological shifts, and external pressures of all kinds. Even during periods of closest ties with the United States, Mexico maintained a clear line: non-participation in the political and economic encirclement of Cuba.

That historical continuity has been broken. The immediate context of this shift is well-known. Washington has made it clear that it will impose tariffs and indirect sanctions on countries that continue exporting oil to the island. Faced with this scenario, Mexico has chosen to withdraw from the energy supply and present the decision as a reconfiguration of its support: less oil, more “other types of aid.” The logic is transparent. The aim is to avoid trade penalties by shifting solidarity to a less contentious arena from the perspective of the bilateral relationship.

However, this shift is not neutral. Swapping oil for humanitarian aid does not equate to upholding a policy of autonomy, but rather to adapting to externally defined boundaries. Assistance can alleviate specific shortages and address immediate emergencies, but it does not replace the political significance of maintaining an energy relationship within a context of explicit encirclement. The implicit message is clear: Mexico accepts the US’ imposed limits and is reorganizing its foreign policy within them.

By yielding under [American] pressure, the Mexican state sends a disturbing message: sovereignty ceases to be a guiding principle and becomes a negotiable variable. The idea takes hold that, under certain external conditions, autonomy can be pragmatically suspended without significant public deliberation. This precedent is more serious than any short-term calculations regarding bilateral relations or momentary balances.

The decision cannot be interpreted as a technical adjustment or an isolated administrative measure. It is, in fact, a shift in foreign policy. Not because Mexico has the material capacity to determine the island’s fate—it does not—but because it is abandoning a historical position that granted it a distinct, recognizable, and respected place on the Latin American diplomatic map.

It is important to be precise. Cuba is not currently facing a crisis due to Mexico’s actions. The causes of its fragility are structural, accumulated, and deep-rooted: decades of blockade, the exhaustion of its production model, unresolved internal tensions, and an increasingly adverse international context. To think that the fall or transformation of a government can be explained by a single external decision would be a serious analytical error and a historical oversimplification.

But in international politics, symbols matter as much as material flows. Mexico was not a decisive energy supplier for Cuba. Its weight did not lie in volumes or contracts. It was something different: a political anchor, a persistent reminder that not all of Latin America readily accepted the logic of isolation and punishment. By withdrawing from that position, Mexico does not “bring down” Cuba, but it legitimizes the blockade and contributes to normalizing a policy it has historically questioned from the outset: non-intervention.

The main cost of this decision, however, lies not in Havana, but in Mexico City. By yielding under pressure, the Mexican state sends a disturbing message: sovereignty ceases to be a guiding principle and becomes a negotiable variable. The idea takes hold that, under certain external conditions, autonomy can be pragmatically suspended without significant public deliberation. This precedent is more serious than any short-term calculations regarding bilateral relations or momentary balances.

For the Latin American left—even for those who have been critical of the Cuban government—the meaning is clear. It will not be interpreted as realism or strategic prudence, but as an abandonment of a tradition that distinguished Mexico, even in the face of openly conservative governments of the past. The loss is symbolic, but symbolic losses often have lasting and difficult-to-reverse effects.

This shift does not occur in a vacuum. It is part of a broader context in which foreign policy is increasingly being redefined by fear: fear of sanctions, fear of financial instability, fear of diplomatic discomfort. The problem is not recognizing power asymmetries—they have always existed—but rather making them the guiding principle of state action.

This is not a matter of nostalgia or ideological romanticism. It is a historical warning. Countries that relinquish their traditions of autonomy rarely easily regain the ground they leave behind.

When that happens, foreign policy ceases to be strategy and becomes mere risk management. Immediate containment is prioritized over long-term planning. Conflict is avoided, but at the cost of relinquishing a distinct voice.

History doesn’t usually judge tactical errors or decisions made under pressure harshly. But it does clearly record breaches of principle. In the long run, what will remain is not the technical explanation or the specific circumstances, but the moment when Mexico ceased to be an exception and accepted, without much resistance, the role others assigned it.

This is not a matter of nostalgia or ideological romanticism. It is a historical warning. Countries that relinquish their traditions of autonomy rarely easily regain the ground they leave behind. And when they try to do so, they often discover that the cost was greater than they initially seemed willing to admit.

The post When Mexico Ceased Being an Exception appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

957
 
 

Caracas (Orinoco Tribune)—Last week, Venezuela received three new groups of repatriated nationals from the US under the Return to the Homeland Plan, signaling a sharp increase in returns following the resumption of migrant repatriation flights this year. The flights, which landed at Simón Bolívar International Airport in Maiquetía, La Guaira state, come as the nation continues to navigate the aftermath of the January 3 US military attacks.

Recent flight data and statistics
Since the start of 2026, seven repatriation flights have arrived in Venezuela from the US, bringing a total of 1,509 citizens back home. Last week alone, 710 Venezuelans were repatriated in three separate flights. When added to the 18,971 repatriations carried out by the end of 2025, the total figure reaches 20,480 repatriated migrants who have escaped wrongful detentions and racist persecution in the US.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Ministerio Relaciones Interiores, Justicia y Paz (@minjusticia_ve)

As announced by the Ministry of Justice, the latest flights operated by the US-based Eastern Airlines were:

• Flight no. 103: Arrived from the United States with 128 migrants, including 22 women, 89 men, and 17 minors.
• Flight no. 104: Arrived from Phoenix, Arizona, repatriating 273 citizens, consisting of 40 women, 232 men, and one minor.
• Flight no. 105: Also arriving from Phoenix, Arizona, this flight brought 309 Venezuelan migrants, including 40 women, 232 men, and one minor.

These arrivals follow the previous total of 799 returnees across four flights (numbers 99 through 102). The resumption of these flights occurs in the wake of the January 3 attack perpetrated by the US regime against Venezuela. The attack included the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. While a mutually agreed-upon program has been in place since early 2025, the Trump administration unilaterally suspended the flights between mid-December 2025 and the last half of January 2026.

Genesis of the migration crisis and Venezuelan repatriation efforts
The mass migration of Venezuelans began after they were impacted by the profound economic crisis between 2015 and 2020, resulting directly from illegal US sanctions. This was followed by a sustained smear campaign and outbreaks of xenophobic violence in the US, which often included false allegations of criminality against migrants. Subsequently, the US regime initiated mass detentions and deportations, frequently of individuals who had no criminal records and were awaiting the resolution of immigration cases.

Every Venezuelan migrant returning under the Return to the Homeland Plan is received with established protocols that include immediate medical care, psychological support, and legal and socioeconomic guidance to assist their reintegration into Venezuelan society. Since its inception in 2018, the program has provided a safe and dignified return for Venezuelans who have faced exploitation and xenophobia while living abroad.

Venezuela and Dominican Republic Restore Consular Services and Direct Flights

The reactivation of the Phoenix-Maiquetía route, primarily operated by US-based airline Eastern, is expected to be followed by additional charter flights and the resumption of direct commercial flight connections between the two countries.

While the US has emphasized these flights as part of a broader strategy to manage its racist migration policies, Venezuelan officials have maintained that the return of citizens must occur under sovereign and dignified conditions.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

958
 
 

Mérida, February 2, 2026 (venezuelanalysis.com) – Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez met with US Chargé d’Affaires Laura Dogu in Miraflores Presidential Palace on Monday afternoon.

According to Communications Minister Miguel Pérez Pirela, the meeting took place “in the context of the working agenda” between Caracas and Washington. National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez was likewise present.

Dogu confirmed the high-level audience with Venezuelan leaders via social media, saying that she reiterated Washington’s intended “three-phase plan” for the Caribbean nation.

“Today I met with Delcy Rodríguez and Jorge Rodríguez to reiterate the three phases that Secretary of State Marco Rubio has proposed for Venezuela: stabilization, economic recovery and reconciliation, and transition,” she said.

The US diplomat arrived in Caracas on Saturday, vowing that her team is “ready to work.” US State Department officials had visited the Venezuelan capital previously to assess conditions for the reopening of the US embassy.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil was the first high-ranking official to meet with Dogu, writing that the country’s authorities are looking to work on “issues of bilateral interest” with US counterparts. On Monday, Gil announced that Félix Plasencia will be Venezuela’s diplomatic representative in the US and will travel to Washington in the coming days.

This diplomatic rapprochement follows the January 3 US military strikes that killed dozens, while special operations teams kidnapped President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady and Deputy Cilia Flores.

In the weeks since, the Venezuelan government has emphasized its commitment to reestablish ties with the Trump administration, with Rodríguez pledging that she is not afraid to address “differences” with Washington through diplomatic channels.

For his part, US President Donald Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he maintains positive relationships with Venezuelan leaders, including the acting president.

Since the January 3 strikes, the White House has claimed control over Venezuelan crude sales, with proceeds reportedly deposited in US-administered accounts in Qatar before a portion is returned to the South American nation. Last week, the Venezuelan National Assembly approved an oil reform granting expanded benefits for private corporations that drew praise from US officials.

Caracas severed diplomatic ties with Washington in 2019 after the Trump administration recognized the self-proclaimed “interim government” headed by Juan Guaidó as the country’s legitimate authority.

A formal reestablishment of diplomatic relations hinges on the White House formally recognizing the Venezuelan acting government, a move that is also a necessary step before any process of debt renegotiation.

Rodríguez announces Amnesty Law, Helicoide closure

Venezuelan acting authorities have combined the restoration of ties with Washington with a fast-moving domestic legislative agenda.

On Friday, during the Supreme Court’s 2026 opening ceremony, Acting President Rodríguez announced a new “General Amnesty Law,” intended to cover acts of political violence that have occurred in Venezuela from 1999 to the present.

In her speech, Rodríguez explained that the law aims to “heal the wounds” resulting from political confrontation.

“I request the full cooperation of the Venezuelan parliament so that this law may contribute to healing the wounds left by confrontation, violence, and extremism,” she told attendees. “May it serve to redirect justice in our country and restore coexistence among Venezuelans.”

The legislative proposal will reportedly exclude those who have been convicted or are facing charges of homicide, drug trafficking, corruption, and serious human rights violations.

Alongside the new law proposal, Rodríguez announced the closure of the Helicoide detention center in Caracas, with plans to turn it into a recreational center. The facility, run by the SEBIN intelligence agency, has held multiple high-profile opposition figures accused of crimes including treason and terrorism.

Human rights organizations over the years have denounced grave human rights violations against Helicoide prisoners. Dozens of prisoners have been gradually released in recent days.

Javier Tarazona, director of the NGO Fundaredes, was among those released during the weekend. He had been detained since 2021 on terrorism and treason charges. Luis Istúriz, a leader from the far-right Vente Venezuela party, also exited the Helicoide on Sunday following 18 months behind bars. He had begun a 30-year sentence on charges of terrorism and conspiracy.

Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello affirmed in a Monday press conference that the amnesty law is about promoting “coexistence and peace” and will see authorities review the cases of people who have “undoubtedly committed crimes.”

“Those who benefit from the amnesty will be given an opportunity to return to politics,” he said, adding that the amnesty project was a government initiative that had no influence from “NGOs and foreign governments.”

Edited and with additional reporting by Ricardo Vaz in Caracas.

The post Venezuela: Rodríguez Hosts US Chargé d’Affaires Dogu in Presidential Palace appeared first on Venezuelanalysis.


From Venezuelanalysis via This RSS Feed.

959
 
 

Iran, Russia, and China are set to conduct a joint naval exercise in the northern Indian Ocean in late February, amid heightened tensions between Tehran and Washington.

The drill, named the “Maritime Security Belt” exercise, will involve units from the Iranian Navy, the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy, and naval forces from China and Russia.

According to officials, the exercise aims to enhance maritime security and strengthen cooperation among the participating countries.

First launched in 2019 by the Iranian Navy, the Maritime Security Belt exercise has been conducted seven times, highlighting ongoing military coordination between Tehran, Beijing, and Moscow in regional and international waters.

Previous editions of the drill featured operations such as search and rescue missions, maritime security maneuvers, and coordination exercises.

The upcoming drill comes amid a sharp rise in threatening rhetoric from Washington and a massive US military buildup near and off the coast of Iran.

The Iran Insurgency

US President Donald Trump said the deployment was aimed at pressuring Tehran into negotiations, warning that failure to reach a deal would trigger a military strike “far worse” than the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025.

Iran has repeatedly rejected threats and coercion, insisting that diplomacy cannot succeed under pressure or intimidation. It has said it is ready for talks if they are fair and based on mutual respect, while warning that any military attack by the US or its allies against Iranian interests would be met with a swift and decisive response.

A US naval strike group has been in Middle Eastern waters since Monday, and Trump has warned it is “ready, willing and able” to hit Iran if necessary.

(PressTV)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

960
 
 

By Manolo De Los Santos – Jan 31, 2026

On January 29, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US national security and tightened the blockade against the island nation

In the stillness of a Havana night, the only sounds are the hum of a generator in a distant hospital and the murmur of a family gathered in candlelight. For them, “US national security” is not an abstract concept debated on American cable news; it is the tangible reality of a 20-hour blackout, the smell of spoiled food, and the fear for a child’s refrigerated medicine. This is the face of a policy that the United States government calls a response to an “extraordinary threat.” The true threat, however, is not military. It is the 67-year defiance of a small island nation that has refused to relinquish its sovereignty.

On January 29, 2026, the Trump administration transformed a long-standing campaign of pressure into a blunt instrument of suffocation. With an executive order, it weaponized the US tariff system against any nation, including countries like Mexico, that dares to sell oil to Cuba. This is no longer about isolating or containing the Cuban people from the rest of the hemisphere; it is a deliberate strategy of total economic asphyxiation, a move unseen in its aggression since the Cold War.

The machinery of suffocation
Cuba’s electrical grid, water pumps, public transport, hospitals, and schools run on imported fuel. By coercing third countries, the US aims not merely to sanction but to disrupt a nation’s very metabolism. The Cuban government’s statement cut to the core: this is “blackmail, threats, and direct coercion” designed to prevent fuel from entering the country. The result is collective punishment, a violation of international law that uses hunger, darkness, and disease as political weapons to break the will of a people.

A constant war: the imperial playbook from Eisenhower to Trump
To call this a “foreign policy” is to undersell its nature. It is an evolving, multilateral instrument of war, relentlessly pursued by ten consecutive US presidencies with a single goal: the destruction of Cuba’s socialist project.

•  Eisenhower (1960) initiated the aggression with the first blockade after Cuba nationalized US-owned refineries.
•  Kennedy (1961-1962) escalated with the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, made the blockade total, and greenlit Operation Mongoose, a secret program of sabotage and attempted assassination of Cuban leaders, including over 630 attempts against Fidel Castro.
•  Clinton (1992-1996) delivered what was hoped to be a “knockout blow” after the Soviet Union’s fall, passing the Torricelli and Helms-Burton Acts. These laws extended the US blockade extraterritorially, punishing foreign companies for trading with Cuba and asserting US authority over global commerce.
•  Trump (2017-2026), after a fragile thaw under Obama, not only reversed course but plunged deeper into cruelty. He added Cuba back to the “State Sponsors of Terrorism” list, a move widely condemned as political fiction, and enacted 243 new sanctions. His most recent act, the 2026 executive order, seeks to seal the island’s fate by starving it of energy.

The strategy has always been naked in its intent. A declassified 1960 State Department memo by Lester D. Mallory advocated creating “hunger, desperation and overthrow of government” by denying “money and supplies.” The human cost is the point, not a side effect.

President of Cuba Slams New US Oil Blockade (+ALBA-TCP)

The “brutal dilemma” and its human toll
This engineered crisis has measurable, horrific consequences. By the 1990s, the tightened blockade caused a 40% drop in caloric intake and a 48% surge in tuberculosis deaths. Today, it blocks the purchase of medical ventilators, spare parts for water purification, and, crucially, the fuel to power them.

This suffering is framed as a necessary sacrifice by members of the Cuban-American mafia that serve in the US Congress. US Representative Maria Elvira Salazar of Florida, recently articulated the chilling calculus: “It’s devastating to think about a mother’s hunger, a child who needs immediate help… But that is precisely the brutal dilemma we face…: to alleviate short-term suffering or to free Cuba forever.”

This promised “freedom” is a return to the pre-1959 past, when US corporations controlled 80% of Cuba’s public utilities and 70% of all arable land. It is the “freedom” to exploit, purchased with the calculated suffering of an entire generation.

The “Donroe Doctrine”: imperialism unleashed
Trump’s escalation is the cornerstone of his administration’s “Donroe Doctrine,” a 21st-century revival of the 1823 Monroe Doctrine that declares the whole of Latin America and the Caribbean to be US property. Following the illegal attack of January 3, 2026, on Venezuela, Trump stated plainly: “American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again.” Under this doctrine, any nation that chooses an independent path, especially one organizing its economy for human need, like Cuba’s world-renowned healthcare system, is deemed a “national emergency”.

The war abroad and the war at home
For the American people, it is critical to see this not as a distant issue but as part of a continuous logic. The same administration that invokes “national emergencies” to strangle Cuba’s economy uses “emergencies” to unleash ICE raids in US cities and kill its own citizens like Renee Good and Alex Pretti. The same mindset that labels 11 million Cubans a collective threat for practicing self-determination labels migrants and minorities as domestic threats. The logic of the blockade and the logic of the border are one and the same: the violent control of populations and resources, and the designation of entire groups of human beings as disposable.

The flickering candle in that Havana home, then, is more than a light against the darkness. It is a defiance of an imperial order. The struggle of the Cuban people to keep their lights on is a fundamental struggle for the right of all peoples to determine their destiny, free from the coercion of an empire that confuses dominance with security and mistakes cruelty for strength. As in the past, Cubans will collectively rise to the challenge in order to not only survive, but overcome the blockade.

(Peoples Dispatch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

961
 
 

In a key step forward for regional diplomacy, the Venezuelan and Dominican foreign ministries announced the reactivation of their consular services in Caracas and Santo Domingo. This measure will allow Venezuelan and Dominican communities in both countries to regain immediate access to legal procedures and official assistance.

Along with the reopening of consular services, both governments instructed their aviation authorities to restore bilateral air service. This decision ends the suspension of commercial flights that had been in place since July 2024, when Caracas condemned acts of foreign interference following Venezuela’s presidential elections.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil announced that the agreement aims to normalize passenger traffic and strengthen logistical ties in the Caribbean. The previous disruption not only affected the mobility of thousands of citizens but also included preventative restrictions on civil aviation for national security reasons. 

After months of diplomatic negotiations, mutual understanding enabled the overcoming of political tensions in the interest of the populations. The resumption of air routes is a direct, cost-effective solution for family reunions and trade activities that had been forced to involve stopovers in third countries.

#Comunicado 📢 Las Cancillerías de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela y de la República Dominicana informan a la opinión pública que, como resultado del trabajo conjunto entre ambas partes, se ha decidido reactivar en los próximos días los servicios consulares de República… pic.twitter.com/VoA3vnCObR

— Yvan Gil (@yvangil) February 1, 2026

The reopening of consulates will facilitate critical processes such as passport renewals and identity verification procedures that had been stalled. This new phase of pragmatic relations is based on respect for sovereignty and international law, principles that the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has upheld as the foundation of any diplomatic engagement.

Flights are expected to gradually return to normal under the supervision of each nation’s regulatory bodies. This agreement reaffirms that constructive dialogue remains the most effective way to resolve differences, allowing both countries to resume cooperation that is essential for regional stability.

(Telesur)

Translation by Orinoco Tribune

OT/AS/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

962
 
 

This article by Mariana Campos originally appeared in the February 2, 2026 edition of Infobae. Photographs are by photojournalist David Bacon [The Reality Check]. Thank you to David for permission for use of his photographs.

David’s note: Farmworkers and other residents of the Zapata colonia in the San Quintin Valley initiated a blockade of Transpeninsular Highway to protest corruption in the new government of the San Quintin municipality.

During the press conference this Monday, February 2, President Claudia Sheinbaum was questioned about the alleged reprimand she gave to fellow members of the Morena party in the state of Baja California, a situation that raised doubts about the unity of the party members at present.

“San Quintín is an area with many needs; it’s barely a municipality in the state of Baja California, having been part of Ensenada. For many years, it has had this agricultural production by companies, unlike other places in our country where it relies on farm laborers. These workers receive an income for working in the fields, and for many years part of the problem for these farmworkers was that they brought their families to work, often with child labor and using a lot of pesticides,” the President commented.

SAN QUINTIN, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO – JANUARY 22, 2026 – Farmworkers and other residents of the Zapata colonia in the San Quintin Valley blockade the Transpeninsular Highway to protest corruption in the new government of the San Quintin municipality. Photo: David Bacon

“We are developing the San Quintín Justice Plan; there have been many struggles by farmworkers for their rights there… Faced with this situation, one feels a certain sadness, a certain anguish and sorrow for the situation that many compatriots are experiencing in our country.”

SAN QUINTIN, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO – 22JANUARY26 – Farmworkers and other residents of the Zapata colonia in the San Quintin Valley blockade the Transpeninsular Highway to protest corruption in the new government of the San Quintin municipality. Photo: David Bacon

What Sparked the President’s Anger?

The incident occurred at the end of the presentation of the Justice Plan for Agricultural Workers, when the President was approached by local officials who wanted to greet her or take pictures with her. In response, Sheinbaum issued a direct order: “All of you: work more with the people!” demanding greater commitment to local communities and closer ties with the public.

The reprimand, captured on video and quickly shared on social media, reflected the mayor’s displeasure with the behavior of some elected officials. During the private event, attended mainly by farmworkers, the mayor also faced complaints against the local mayor, Miriam Cano Núñez, who was ignored by the President after protests from attendees. In response to citizen complaints about the lack of official attention, Sheinbaum promised to send a federal representative to reside permanently in the area to oversee the community’s needs.

This warning comes in a context where the federal administration seeks to strengthen direct contact with the social base, preventing officials from limiting themselves to ceremonial acts.

SAN QUINTIN, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO – 22JANUARY26 – Farmworkers and other residents of the Zapata colonia in the San Quintin Valley blockade the Transpeninsular Highway to protest corruption in the new government of the San Quintin municipality. Photo: David Bacon

President Sheinbaum Clarifies the Situation

After the video went viral, questions quickly arose about the communication between the president and local legislators. In response, she stated:

“As I was leaving the place , they were saying ‘photo, photo, photo’ to me, and it seemed to me that the photo of the president didn’t go with the circumstances they were experiencing, so that’s why I feel a little annoyed. I told them: ‘Don’t just stay up there, don’t just stay there in Congress or here in the city, go out into the field, be close to the people,’ because that’s what we always have to keep in mind, especially when there are significant needs in a population.”

SAN QUINTIN, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO – 25JANUARY26 – Farmworkers and other residents of the Camalu colonia in the San Quintin Valley blockade the Transpeninsular Highway to protest corruption in the new government of the San Quintin municipality. Photo: David Bacon

The post San Quintín Workers Blockade, Sheinbaum Reprimands Morena Members: “Work more with the people!” appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

963
 
 

This article by Jaime Ortega appeared in the February 2nd, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

The bond between Cuba and Mexico is deeply rooted. Sympathy for the independence and revolutionary movements on the island is as old as the movements themselves. This sentiment was strengthened by the Mexican exiles, at different times, of the “three M’s”: Martí, Mella, and Marinello. They were joined by other figures such as Raúl Roa, who in his Return to the Dawn defined Morelos as “a great civil hero of Mexico,” Juárez as “great for being a hero, a revolutionary, and an indigenous person,” and Cárdenas as “the most formidable leader of the Mexican Revolution.”

In the Communist Party of Mexico, the figure of the Cuban [Julio Antonio] Mella was, of course, legendary. His assassination in the streets of the Juárez neighborhood made him an icon for communists in both nations. Benita Galeana’s testimony has revealed the clandestine and heroic way in which Mella’s ashes were smuggled out of Mexico in 1933. Meanwhile, in 1934, the Mexican section of the International Red Aid (IRA) worked alongside the League of Revolutionary Armed Forces (LEAR) and the Hands Off Cuba campaign, demanding non-intervention on the island, based on the similarity of the aggressions: in Mexico in 1914 and on the island two decades later. Other Cuban voices and writers made their presence felt in the Mexican cultural scene; one significant figure was Loló de la Torriente (cousin of the legendary journalist Pablo de la Torriente, who died in the Spanish Civil War), a frequent contributor to the newspaper El Machete.

Julio Antonio Mella Photo: Jay Watts

However, of all the figures who shared a passion for solidarity with the Cuban people, General Cárdenas is undoubtedly the most important, and rightly so. It is not surprising that from 1936 onward, numerous expressions of friendship were extended from the island toward the revolutionary actions of the man from Michoacán, since by the time the general assumed the presidency, the Cuban Revolution of 1933 had already overthrown the infamous Gerardo Machado. An episode recounted by Ángel Gutiérrez, among others, in Lázaro Cárdenas and Cuba sheds light on the mutual commitment between the Cuban revolutionaries and the popular Mexican leader.

The fact that the two countries immediately south of the border with the United States had to undergo several revolutions to establish their sovereignty is indicative of the nature of their nationalism: defensive and united in the face of aggression.

The most intense period was in 1938, when, following the oil expropriation, numerous articles appeared honoring and defending both the act and the Mexican President. In addition to Juan Marinello, well-known to Mexicans, Salvador Massip, José Luciano Franco, and Ángel Augier spoke out in defense of Mexican sovereignty. Franco stated that Cárdenas’s actions had broken “with the inferiority complex imposed on the countries of our America by financiers.” Words turned to action, and a group, including Carlos Rafael Rodríguez, head of the Friends of the Committee for a Tribute to Mexico, set about contacting the Mexican ambassador on the island. Marinello, for his part, approached Francisco J. Múgica to request that the president address the Cuban people. Múgica convinced his former comrade-in-arms, and Cárdenas agreed.

Photo: Jaime Ortega

Thus, on June 12, 1938, a large rally in support of Mexico was held at La Polar Stadium in Havana, attended by thousands. Admission was 10 cents, and the proceeds were earmarked to support the expropriation, making it reasonable to assume that part of the nationalization was paid for with the sweat of the Cuban people. Cárdenas delivered a radio address from Tampico, stating that the “political and spiritual” autonomy of the Latin American republics would be crippled “if a concept of solidarity among their peoples is not affirmed.” Carlos Prío Socarrás, Lázaro Peña, and Marinello himself also spoke at the Havana stadium.

The Cuban rally was one of the most significant demonstrations in support of the oil expropriation outside of Mexico, and the island was among the countries that most strongly supported it in the face of the oil companies’ boycott.

It is no coincidence that, decades later, in 1961, a group of intellectuals—among them another friend of revolutionary Cuba, Revueltas—published an article in the newspaper Hoja Revolucionaria with the headline: “Not sending oil to Cuba is betraying the oil expropriation.”

The fact that General Cárdenas was no longer in power did not prevent him from expressing his firm support for the cause of the sister nation, a cause that found its epicenter in the Latin American Conference for National Sovereignty, Economic Independence, and Peace, which was attended by, among others, Vilma Espín.

Many years after General Cárdenas’s death, in 1995, Commander Fidel Castro evoked the Michoacán native while attending an event in the Plaza de la Revolución, where he remembered him “struggling with his usual sobriety, deeply moved and with an exalted spirit. His speech was a torrent of revolutionary and Latin American fervor.” The fact that the two countries immediately south of the border with the United States had to undergo several revolutions to establish their sovereignty is indicative of the nature of their nationalism: defensive and united in the face of aggression.

Jaime Ortega is the Director of Memoria, the Magazine of Militant Criticism, a researcher at UAM, the author of La raíz nacional-popular: las izquierdas más allá de la transición, and co-author of The Plebeian Roots of Mexican Democracy.

The post Cárdenas & Cuba: The Torrent of Solidarity appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

964
 
 

Russia denounces the United States’ “unacceptable” economic and military pressure on Cuba as the administration of US President Donald Trump moves to cut off oil shipments to the Caribbean country.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

965
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Historic Mobility: The Mexico–Toluca Train Line is a Reality of the 4T

The Interurban train will cover 57 km, with the capacity to transport up to 140,000 passengers per day and complete the journey in 59 minutes. It is a project revived by President López Obrador and completed by President Claudia Sheinbaum.

Mexico City Head of Government Clara Brugada emphasized that this project embodies a long-awaited transformation in urban transportation stalled for years by past corruption. State of Mexico Governor Delfina Gómez noted its impact, consisting of safe, fast transportation that improves the quality of life for residents of Mexico City and the State of Mexico.

No More Abuse: Ticketmaster Under Scrutiny

The Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco) reported that Ticketmaster has been notified of the decision in the legal proceedings over the sale of BTS concert tickets in Mexico, with a fine exceeding 5 million pesos (US$290,000). Sheinbaum added that she has already responded to her South Korean counterpart and will contact the promoter to arrange more concerts.

Principled Foreign Policy: Mexico Stands Firm

The President clarified that her phone call with Donald Trump did not address the invitation to the so-called “Peace Summit,” and stated that the Ministry of Foreign Relations will respond formally this week. On Palestine, she was unequivocal: Mexico’s stance remains unchanged—it’s not personal, but the position of the Mexican State.

Solidarity Without Blockades: Mexico Supports Cuba

President Sheinbaum announced that the Mexican Government is already coordinating efforts with the Cuban embassy to define the type of humanitarian aid to be sent to the island.

  • People’s Mañanera February 2

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera February 2

    February 2, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on Mexico-Toluca train line, Ticketmaster fine over BTS profiteering, Mexican foreign policy and humanitarian aid for Cuba.

  • Petróleo Mexicano para los Cubanos!

    News Briefs | Photos

    Petróleo Mexicano para los Cubanos!

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    Solidarity protestors gathered outside of the former location of the Embassy of the United States on Reforma in Mexico City on Sunday, demanding that Mexico send oil to Cuba and expressing their disavowal of Trump’s recent assault on the island and its people.

  • Mexican Anti-imperialist Front in Support of Venezuela Founded in Morelos

    News Briefs

    Mexican Anti-imperialist Front in Support of Venezuela Founded in Morelos

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    On February 7th, a national march for Venezuela will be held to demand the release of Maduro and Flores, and marches or rallies will take place in the capitals of each state.

The post People’s Mañanera February 2 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

966
 
 

This article by Rubicela Morelos Cruz originally appeared in the January 31, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Cuernavaca, Morelos. This Saturday the Mexican Anti-Imperialist Front for Venezuela and the freedom of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, and for the self-determination of peoples was formed, where the ambassador of Venezuela in Mexico, Stella Marina Lugo Betancourt de Montilla, was present.

The person in charge of asking for the vote for the approval of this Anti-Imperialist Front in Morelos was the social activist and husband of the governor Margarita González, Carmelo Enríquez, to the more than 500 members of different social, political, civil, teachers’ and peasant organizations who met this Saturday in the auditorium of the Mexican Union of Electricians (SME), located in the center of Cuernavaca.

Rosa María Hernández Trejo, the organizer of this Front, explained that state committees are being created in each state of the country, as happened today in this state, and that the national constitution of said Mexican Imperialist Front for Venezuela will be on February 14th in Mexico City.

Rosa María Hernández Trejo, the organizer of this Front, explained that state committees are being created in each state of the country. Photo: Rubicela Morelos

Meanwhile, the members of this Front called for a mobilization on February 3rd, a global protest to reject the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, on orders from US President Donald Trump, one month after the United States invaded Venezuela and deprived both Nicolás and Cilia of their freedom.

On February 7th, a national march for Venezuela will be held to demand the release of Maduro and Flores, and marches or rallies will take place in the capitals of each state. “A united front for Venezuela is also a united front for Mexico and for all of Latin America,” emphasized social activist Hernández Trejo.

The post Mexican Anti-imperialist Front in Support of Venezuela Founded in Morelos appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

967
 
 

By Eva Karene Bartlett – Feb 01, 2026

No. This is sensationalism.

I was asked about the following claim:

Sanctions are having a debilitating effect on the Russian population, while the oligarchs are getting rich.”

To claim that the sanctions against Russia are having a “debilitating effect on the population” is sensationalist, ridiculous, and dishonest.

Debilitating is a very strong descriptive and is not accurate to describe the West’s economic war thus far against Russia. Against Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and other countries, absolutely debilitating. Russia? No.

Yes, life would be much easier without sanctions, but people have adapted. Certain foreign items are not available—or if so, more expensive—financial interactions to/from Russia are difficult, but everyday life continues, not destroyed by the sanctions.

I’ve been living in Russia since 2021, before the sanctions ramped up. There hasn’t been a noticeably “debilitating” impact. And note: I don’t live in a Moscow bubble, nor in an expensive or trendy area of Moscow. My observations are not based on being blinded by a glamourous foreigner life. Until last October, I was living quite a ways outside of Moscow, in the countryside. Currently, I’m living in a rural area of Moscow which geographically should be its countryside (the city limits in some areas extend beyond the ring most people know to be Moscow).

I take a 10 minute bus ride to get to the nearest grocery stores and market. While prices/inflation has gone up, so it has too in countries around the world. Life here continues as normal. I can contrast this very well to what I’ve seen in Syria, Venezuela, Gaza (which has been under a very debilitating blockade for over 20 years), and honestly, life is just normal here.

I spent much of 2022 in the Donbass, but I’ve also subsequently visited other Russian cities, including St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Voronezh, Rostov-on-Don, Anapa, cities in Crimea (Yalta, Sevastopol, Simferopol), also quaint touristy areas in the Vladimir region & beyond (Suzdal and Plyos). In the case of Crimea, Suzdal and Plyos, I visited during summer, and the towns and cities, and their restaurants and cafes, were packed with Russian tourists or locals. So was the opera in Novosibirsk, and seaside restaurants and cafes in Anapa. Even in Mariupol, which western media would have you believe is destroyed (and “occupied”), I saw a renewal of life and activity when I was last there (mid 2024), compared to prior years. This included newly opened sidewalk cafes, restaurants, supermarkets, and much money spent on construction, renovation and new projects.

If you went into the centre of Moscow during Christmas and New Years holidays, you saw all the key areas (Red Square and around, VDNK, etc) packed with Russians who were so not debilitated they had money to spend on overpriced drinks and snacks in these touristy areas. Likewise during Maslenitsa, when Russians celebrate the end of winter, gathering in public parks where music and dance performances ensue until the burning of the effigy, and where still more food and drinks are sold, as well as crafts, jewerly, toys, clothing…This is not the activity of a population crushed under sanctions.

However, to be sure I’m not just ill-informed, I asked a number of friends what they thought of the phrase, “the sanctions are having a debilitating effect on the Russian population, while the oligarchs are getting rich.” (For friends who commented publicly, I’ll use their name):

My good friends who also live quite simply and rural, in the Moscow countryside replied: “There has been an increase in prices, the sanctions have made life a little hard, but ‘debilitating’ is insanely exaggerated.”

Another friend, who lives in Moscow, but no where near the centre and not in a bubble: “Not at all, this is false. People have gotten used to the sanctions and adapted.”

A friend in Kursk: “Well the “sanctions”/economic warfare against Russia, have hurt the economy somewhat, but it’s not near what you call “debilitating” obviously, because “debilitating” would mean that the economy is so crippled that it cannot bounce back. But the same sanctions have actually made the Russian economy more self-reliant and thus stronger. Yes the consumer prices keep going up, but I personally (a resident of a 500k population Russian city), don’t see the impact as debilitating as the collective West would want them to be… Of course being relatively close to the borderline, we are experiencing the impacts of the ongoing SMO and Ukrainian terror attacks upon our territories.”

Anatoly Yakovlev, in Moscow: “Well, as we say in Russia, the question is surely interesting. First and foremost, the term ‘debilitating’ is NOT relevant to the nation, which is used to STAND at all church services from 2.5 to 4 hours, as is in the case of the Easter church service. Those who lived as an adult in the 1990s, when times were really very tough and shocking, can confirm that even those 1990s didn‘t put the Russians on their knees. Yes, there is inflation. And wages are rising along with inflation. I know it from numerous friends of mine. So I guess this term and this combination ‘debilitating effect on the Russian population’ can be and is often heard from Russian liberals. They hate Russia, they hate us, the Russians deep inside.

Alexandra: “We don’t give a damn about sanctions. Store shelves are bursting, regions have received incredible tourism development because flying abroad is a hassle with so many layovers. Small and medium businesses have developed very strongly.

And this is coming from me – a basic middle class person.

There is nowhere to park cars because there are so many of them. People are well dressed. And there were no free seats at the opera in the big theater at 11 this morning. It was a matinee, damn it. And all the tiers were packed.”

Andrei: “Oligarchs (or the Western version of “billionaires”, which is just another form of propaganda) – they are billionaires for a reason. They get richer in any country, regardless of the situation.

The question is – do others become poorer at the same time? I don’t see that happening in Russia yet. Sure, there have been some unpleasant recent changes – like the waste collection tax, but overall, people’s lives have improved. I don’t see poverty or even extreme poverty. Maybe it’s worse in remote areas, but those areas are just that – poorer and so on in any country.

Honestly, ordinary Russians don’t give a damn about the sanctions. The only thing that’s annoying is that traveling is harder and everything else is the same. There are goods, the quality is still the same. Many sanctioned products are still available. The fact that some clothing brands are gone – who cares about them?

In general, at the everyday level, an ordinary person will just laugh and say, “Bring it on!” about the sanctions. Traveling is problematic – yes, that’s true. But now they’ve even introduced a visa-free regime with China, so we’ll start traveling more to Asia. Besides, Europe is gradually turning into a cesspool anyway.

Qingyuan Peng, in Nizhny Novgorod: “The inflation is not only due to sanctions. The sanctions as such have negligible influence on my everyday life. I am grateful for the sanctions. They have really curbed American Cultural Imperialism. US brands are out of the lives of ordinary people. I hope the sanctions will last another 10 years. I don’t want any US companies or brands back. None. Maybe even Gen-Z will learn to cope eventually.

Ekaterina Jiritskaya: “We always remember our grandparents who lived in incredibly more difficult conditions during the Great Patriotic War and were able to win. Therefore, we are ashamed of even a minor complaint. What have we lost now? Facebook, which bans for telling the truth? Trips to Europe? But we loved Europe, which supported Dostoevsky, not Bandera, and now it’s strange to leave money there, sponsoring the deaths of civilians in Belgorod or Donbass. We have lost some fashion, auto and computer brands, some booking options, and we have some inflation, but we understand that it is the price for being Russians and being independent.”

Perhaps the most insightful reply (with all respect to those before him), was that of my friend Aleksandr, 42, working at a university in Voronezh:

First, I’d like to show what the average Russian citizen living far from Moscow sees.

From the news, I’ve heard that since 2014, countless sanctions have been imposed on Russia. But, regardless of fluctuations in the currency exchange rate, oil prices, the cost of goods, or any other factors, the availability of goods or services for ordinary people hasn’t decreased. I’m primarily referring to access to healthcare (including dentistry), food, education, and the cost of gas and electricity.

Perhaps development has slowed down, but in my area of the city, since 2022, the largest secondary school in Russia has been built, and a transport interchange for cars has been constructed. This new road was urgently needed because an entire new residential district with kindergartens and a hospital was built. Also, in one part of the city, where I live in Voronezh, about 600 km from Moscow, a huge section of the road is being reconstructed with a new overpass and bridge. Last year, a huge new park was opened, and a beautiful embankment was built on the Voronezh River. And all of this was done since 2022. My mother, a pensioner, still has access to free healthcare. Moreover, she can book an appointment with a specialist doctor, not just a general practitioner, for tomorrow, rather than waiting two months.

My brother, a middle-aged worker at a furniture factory and approaching retirement age, can afford to pay for his son’s university education. My nephew will graduate with a higher education diploma this year. And he doesn’t need a loan for this. Last summer, my brother, his wife, and son went to rest on the Black Sea.

Two parts of Voronezh are separated by a reservoir. After the introduction of visa restrictions to Europe in 2022, domestic tourism has become very popular in our area. People have started exploring the “big water of Voronezh”, so the number of sailing and motor boats has increased significantly. And due to the large number of boats, there are discussions about imposing restrictions on navigation in some parts of the waterway.

And I think that if you ask about what infrastructure projects have been implemented since 2022 in the area of the city where those who claim that there’s an economic crisis in Russia live, they’re unlikely to be able to list a series of positive transformations.

But, I understand why opponents constantly try to prove that the problems in Russia are catastrophic. And this isn’t even an attempt to shift the focus from their own problems to those of their enemies. I think that so-called “Russia experts”, taking advantage of their audience’s lack of knowledge about the basics of the economic system in Russia, present ordinary changes (not always positive ones), such as inflation related to military spending, as something that has a catastrophic impact.

And from the point of view of their readers, these negative changes really do have a catastrophic impact. But the problem is that this assessment is typical of the world and the system in which they live, not of Russia’s economic system.

Firstly, due to numerous sanctions, since 2014, business in Russia has become oriented towards the domestic market, the market associated with Russian defense enterprises, and the Asian market.

Therefore, the level of consumption of Russian residents hasn’t changed much either after 2014 or after 2022.

Moreover, the situation I’ve described is typical for most regions of Russia. Of course, some places are a bit better off, others a bit worse. But overall, the average situation is the same everywhere.

China and Russia Reaffirm Commitment to Cuba

Actually debilitating:
“Debilitating” were the sanctions against Syria which seriously impoverished the people and which made it impossible to import certain vital medications, medical equipment, and more. Over the years, I wrote many times about the sanctions.

In this 2019 article, I wrote, “When I was in Syria last October, a man told me his wife had been diagnosed with breast cancer, but because of the sanctions he couldn’t get her the conventional treatments most in the West would avail of.

In 2016, in Aleppo, before it was liberated of al-Qaeda and co, Dr. Nabil Antaki told me how –because of the sanctions– it had taken him well over a year to get a simple part for his gastroenterology practise.

In 2015, visiting Damascus’ University Hospital where bed after bed was occupied by a child maimed by terrorists’ shelling (from Ghouta), a nurse told me: “We have so many difficulties to ensure that we have antibiotics, specialized medicines, maintenance of the equipment… Because of the sanctions, many parts are not available, we have difficulties obtaining them.”

Visiting a prosthetic limbs factory in Damascus in 2016, I was told that, due to the sanctions, smart technology and 3D scanners –used to determine the exact location where a limb should be fixed– were not available. Considering the over eight years of war and terrorism in Syria, there are untold numbers of civilians and soldiers in need of this technology to simply get a prosthetic limb fixed so they can get on with their lives...”

In a 2020 article, I wrote, “Syria reports that the latest sanctions are already preventing civilians from acquiring “imported drugs, especially antibiotics, as some companies have withdrawn their licenses granted to drug factories,” due to the sanctions. In Damascus, pharmacies I’ve stopped into, when I ask what some of the most sought-after medications are, hypertension medications are at the top…”

“Debilitating” are the sanctions against Venezuela: A 2019 report by the Center for Economic and Policy Researchestimated 40,000 deaths had occurred due to sanctions in 2017-2018.

In 2019, I wrote about my recent time in Venezuela, and the sanctions, noting, a six-year-old boy needing a bone marrow transplant and treatment (provided by an association in agreement with the PDVSA, Venezuela’s oil and natural gas company), diedas a result of his treatment being denied due to US sanctions on PDVSA.

What we are enduring in Russia is NOTHING like the above examples. Yeah, a Lindt chocolate bar which used to cost under 200 rubles now costs 400 rubles or more; other items/brands are not available; but there are plenty of Russian, Chinese, etc, substitutes. Yes, imported cars are super expensive (for someone on my budget).

But that’s not “debilitating”. Such language is used by those with an ulterior motive.

Novosibirsk Opera, 2023 (Note: I didn’t take videos because generally it isn’t allowed. But the opera was packed with well dressed people)

(Substack)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

968
 
 

This editorial by Diego Torres appears as the introduction to the February 2026 issue ofHablemos de Migración*, a newsletter on migration issues published by the Frente Amplio de Mexicanos y Migrantes. We encourage you to subscribe. The English version of the February 2026 issue is available for download.*

To speak of migration in the current context, to declare that global rights are at risk under the Trump administration, might seem like an exaggeration. However,
the facts point in the opposite direction. The systematic violation of norms—legal, political, and ethical—has been a constant throughout his tenure, and this escalation became more visible and alarming after his first term. This issue focuses on that direct relationship: when rights regress, displacement accelerates.

The abuses committed during his time as a businessman cannot be attributed entirely to a single individual: they also stem from a permissive, unequal, and corrupt system that allowed him—like other millionaires—to profit from and abuse the system with impunity. But as President of the United States, the logic shifts: there he tasted the fruits of power with fragile checks and balances, and from that position, he has pursued an agenda that combines arbitrariness, political calculation, and unbridled ambition. His project is no small matter: it rests on the idea of wielding personalistic, almost monarchical, power. And if it is not stopped in time, its consequences could cost the lives and futures of thousands or even millions of people.

During his first term (2017–2021), he faced two impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives. The first was for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress: he was accused of requesting Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, conditioning the delivery of military aid that had already been approved by Congress. The central argument was clear: using his office for personal gain, harming a political adversary, and simultaneously obstructing legislative oversight by not cooperating with the investigation.

The world faces a personalistic, erratic, and dangerous power.

The second impeachment was for inciting insurrection after losing the 2020 election, in the context of the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Actions and speeches before and during that day encouraged thousands of people to attempt to prevent the certification of the election results—that is, to subvert the democratic process and violate his oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.” Even with compelling evidence, he was acquitted in both cases.

And those weren’t the only accusations. His administration was embroiled in numerous allegations that, for various reasons, didn’t pursue their legal course to the end.

One example is Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election: the report documented numerous contacts with Russia; it didn’t establish a criminal conspiracy, but neither did it exonerate the president from possible obstruction of justice. In fact, it presented evidence consistent with a pattern characteristic of his presidency: punishing or removing anyone who didn’t fall in line. The case of then-FBI Director James Comey was emblematic.

The following years were also fraught with scandals and investigations. He faced dozens of charges, including the illegal withholding and concealment of documents related to national defense, obstruction of justice, and making false statements. He was also found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records and held civilly liable for fraudulently inflating the value of his assets to obtain favorable loan and insurance terms. In the realm of sexual matters, the writer E. Jean Carroll sued him for defamation and sexual assault; he was found civilly liable, and the case resulted in a multimillion-dollar settlement.

In his second term, his disregard for the rule of law didn’t wait a single day. Within hours, he signed executive orders, some blatantly unconstitutional. Among them was the pardon of over a thousand people linked to the attack on the Capitol, a politically motivated act of violence that left many dead and dozens wounded. He withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement, reinforcing a narrative of climate change denial. And one of the decisions most clearly contradictory to the Constitution was his attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship, directly conflicting with the 14th Amendment.

Added to this were symbolic and material actions reminiscent of monarchy: even the demolition of the East Wing of the White House, a historic landmark, as if the state were merely an extension of his whims.

Although these measures directly impact American society, the danger extends far beyond. Threats that many dismissed as empty rhetoric or populist promises to seduce a desperate electorate have transformed into real risks. It’s no longer just about rhetoric: the imposition of tariffs as a punitive measure, political blackmail, and open pressure against countries that refuse to comply paint a picture of global instability.

Donald Trump not only violates domestic norms, his conduct spills over into the international order. At home, he enjoys the disciplined support of the Republican Party and, to worsen the situation, the complicity of sectors of the Democratic Party that have yielded on crucial issues: disproportionate budgets for the hunt for migrants, cuts or blockages to essential social programs, and ever-widening margins for military action without effective democratic oversight. On the world stage, the reaction usually remains at the level of statements of rejection: condemnations that sound firm but are ultimately empty, incapable of halting the Trump machine. This was the case with multiple recent crises, such as the genocide in Palestine; it is also the case with the continuation of humanitarian tragedies before an international community that observes, condemns, and ultimately permits, as with the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

If this tsunami of abuses is not stopped, migration will increase in all directions.

Within the United States, many people may be forced to move due to the precariousness of their living conditions, seeking to survive in economic hubs like California or New York—or even in states like Arizona or Texas—following the logic of “migrating to where there are still jobs, services, and opportunities.” Abroad, as long as the structural causes—violence, poverty, inequality, and political crisis persist, migration flows will not decrease. And if the agenda of domination and confrontation escalates, the world may enter a cycle of major conflicts: Russia and China will not remain passive in the face of a United States that seeks to impose its will by force. Imperial competition, militarization, and global destabilization will only produce more poverty, more violence against the most vulnerable, and therefore, more migration.

Incredibly, we are at a historic crossroads: the stability of the world order will depend, to a large extent, on what happens in the coming months. Today, that stability rests in the hands of a man who presents himself as a strong leader but operates as a personalistic, erratic, and dangerous power; someone who combines media-driven senility with political perversity, and who pursues dominance without considering the consequences.

Diego Torres is the founder of El Frente Amplio de Mexicanos y Migrantes, an organization founded in 2022 with the goal of strengthening the unity of the migrant community, contributing to the consolidation of the Fourth Transformation in Mexico’s public life, and advocating for immigration reform in the main migrant-receiving countries; as well as the editor of Hablemos de Migración.

  • Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    Analysis

    Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    On the world stage, the reaction to Trump’s imperialist assault remains at the level of statements of rejection: condemnations that sound firm but are ultimately empty, incapable of halting the Trump machine.

  • Clicks

    News Briefs

    Clicks

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including Mexican oil for Cuba, the Pascual cooperative, negative view of US, Mexican gas dependence, US immigration policy, and Mexico City’s missing Utopias.

  • Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    News Briefs

    Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    The rally condemned US President Trump’s executive order imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba and decried the over 60 year old blockade against the island.

The post Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

969
1
Clicks (mexicosolidarity.com)
 
 

Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics.

Why Mexico Must Help Cuba Telesur. Cuba and Mexico share more than geography. They share a history shaped by revolution, resistance, and an enduring insistence on sovereignty in the shadow of powerful neighbors.

Camilo Ocampo, Refrescos Pascual: la cooperativa mexicana que lucha contra las transnacionales Pie de Página. La cooperativa Pascual enfrenta una nueva amenaza: el aumento al IEPS y las restricciones regulatorias ponen en riesgo su viabilidad, mientras revive una historia marcada por la resistencia obrera y la defensa del control colectivo frente a la concentración de la industria refresquera.

Mexicans Have a Negative Perception of the U.S. Since Trump Returned Telesur. The deterioration of the U.S. image is attributed to restrictive policies and military threats.

José Shaddai Olvera Torres, Acto en CDMX reafirma solidaridad con Cuba y Venezuela en el 173 aniversario de José Martí El Chamuco. Los pueblos latinoamericanos deben conocerse y articularse para enfrentar lo que llamó una “guerra mediática” contra los gobiernos de Cuba y Venezuela.

Mateo Crossa, The Shale Revolution, U.S. Energy Imperialism, and Mexico’s Dependence Monthly Review. Nowhere is this fossil-fueled imperial reordering more starkly evident than in the U.S. energy domination over Mexico, a nation once symbolically and politically defined by its postrevolutionary pursuit of energy sovereignty.

Protesta impulsa creación del Frente Antimperialista Resumen Latinoamericano. Los organizadores subrayaron que la creación del frente representa un acto de resistencia y un llamado a la unidad continental frente a las políticas de injerencia. “Es un acto ignominioso de una barbaridad terrible”, expresaron durante la movilización.

María Ramos Pacheco, ‘We don’t have an opinion’: Mexico’s ambassador to the U.S. on Trump’s immigration policy Dallas Morning News. Even though his country does not get involved in U.S. immigration policies, Esteban Moctezuma Barragán said Mexico is committed to providing help and resources for Mexicans who are deported.

Marath Baruch Bolaños López, Secretario del Trabajo y Previsión Social, Trabajo digno en el siglo XXI La Jornada. La Reforma al Trabajo en Plataformas Digitales es innovadora no sólo porque reconoce y atiende una nueva realidad laboral surgida del desarrollo tecnológico, sino también porque se trata de una política pública que nace de un proceso de análisis de la realidad existente y del diálogo con las y los trabajadores y con las empresas.

Jorge Barrera, Tania Miranda Perez, Trump blindsided Mexico with Cuba oil export tariff threat, says Mexican president CBC News. “So this situation may see a break, not just between Mexico and Cuba, but between the Mexico of tomorrow and the Mexico of yesterday.”

Mariana A. Hernández, Diana Leaños y Oscar Nogueda, Las primeras Utopías en la Ciudad de México siguen en construcción, pese a compromiso de construir 16 cada año Animal Politico. A un año de que la jefa de gobierno prometió construir 16 utopías por año, las primeras instalaciones continúan en construcción y sin fecha oficial de terminación.

  • Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    Analysis

    Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    On the world stage, the reaction to Trump’s imperialist assault remains at the level of statements of rejection: condemnations that sound firm but are ultimately empty, incapable of halting the Trump machine.

  • Clicks

    News Briefs

    Clicks

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including Mexican oil for Cuba, the Pascual cooperative, negative view of US, Mexican gas dependence, US immigration policy, and Mexico City’s missing Utopias.

  • Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    News Briefs

    Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    The rally condemned US President Trump’s executive order imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba and decried the over 60 year old blockade against the island.

The post Clicks appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

970
 
 

This Saturday, Acting President of Venezuela Delcy Rodríguez toured different areas of the Simón Bolívar International Airport in Maiquetía, La Guaira state, to evaluate the progress of works—requested last year by President Nicolás Maduro—being carried out in the country’s main air terminal and to further strengthen commercial air transport.

The inspection was carried out in the company of Transportation Minister Aníbal Coronado, Presidency Office Minister Juan Francisco Escalona, and Communication and Information Minister Miguel Pérez Pirela, as well as airport workers, among other authorities, in order to also verify improvements in the runways and in its vicinity.

Last Thursday, Delcy Rodríguez said that through a telephone conversation she had with US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, they agreed on the cessation of restrictions on Venezuela’s commercial airspace. This would allow new airlines to enter Venezuelan airspace and the resumption of direct Venezuela-US commercial flights.

She emphasized that this dialogue has taken place within the framework of the diplomatic agenda she has maintained with the US government to pave the way for a new stage of exchange and stability under sovereign and mutually beneficial conditions.

The announcement, which resulted from diplomatic dialogue, reaffirms the growing mutual understanding, and will benefit not only Venezuelan and US citizens, but also all those who wish to travel to Venezuela, thus enabling direct and safe travel.

During her statements on Thursday, Rodríguez emphasized that all airlines that suspended operations in Venezuela are welcome to resume operations in the country. So far, TAP Portugal and American Airlines have already announced the resumption of operations, and many more airlines are expected to make similar announcements in the coming days.

Transportation growth
During the tour, the extensive operational capabilities and the large-scale works aimed at enhancing air service in the country was visible. These have also been developed by the Venezuelan government as platforms for economic growth to facilitate local and international investments.

These improvements are under the coordination of the Ministry of Transport, with the objective of developing a modernization plan aimed at offering improved services to travelers and raising the quality standards of the country’s main air terminal.

With the strengthening of the illegal US sanctions against Venezuela, the Simón Bolívar airport was forced to halt air conditioning services in most of its areas, causing significant discomfort to passengers and users.

Many in Venezuela expect that among the improvement work, the air conditioning issue could be resolved, as well as the lack of sufficient migration officers, which causes the international arrival process to be extremely slow and painful for travelers.

Modernizing air transport
These projects will not only have a great positive impact on boosting the transport sector, but also the tourism sector, and in this way promote inbound tourism, which in 2025 closed with a growth of more than 70% compared to 2024.

Venezuela and US Agree To Reopen Commercial Airspace (+Cybersecurity Center)

These works carried out by the Venezuelan government have consisted of constructing the country’s largest runway, capable of accommodating wide-body aircraft. This represents a significant leap forward in the modernization of the various security and control systems installed at the airport; it also marks a transition to a commercial model that will allow economic growth, increased foreign exchange earnings, and, consequently, a broader tourism sector.

Regarding the extensive commercial and hotel network of the area, the Simón Bolívar International Airport is connected to the Gran Cacique Maiquetía Hotel, which is located within its facilities and was recently inaugurated by President Maduro. It offers great advantages for recreation, leisure, for local and international tourists.

(Últimas Noticias) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/JB


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

971
 
 

More explosive accusations from today’s new release of Epstein files. An FBI report from a “credible” and confidential human source says that US president Donald Trump was “compromised by Israel” and that his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, was effectively running his organization and presidency.

The report links Kushner’s family to corruption, Russian cash and the ultra-Zionist Chabad group. It also names Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz as “co-opted by [Israel’s intelligence service] Mossad” to control elite students. Kushner’s father was convicted of financial crimes but then pardoned by Trump.

A Confidential Human Source (CHS) reporting document. Highlighted text on the document reads: "Trump has been compromised by Israel and Kushner is the real brains behind his organization and his Presidency." Photo: X/@GlobeEyeNews.

A Confidential Human Source (CHS) reporting document with highlighted text that reads: “Trump has been compromised by Israel and Kushner is the real brains behind his organization and his Presidency.” Photo: X/@GlobeEyeNews.

Epstein’s status as an Israeli intelligence operative—now beyond reasonable doubt—and ties to his “closest friend” Trump provide a likely means of ‘kompromat’ allegedly making Trump a tool of Israel. The report comes hot on the heels of other released documents detailing witness testimony accusing Trump of raping and beating children provided to him by Epstein. Dershowitz is also accused in the same files of at least being present during the rape—and in at least one case murder—of children.

The CIA, Mossad, and Epstein: Unraveling the Intelligence Ties of the Maxwell Family

The allegations would certainly be borne out by Trump’s willingness to do what Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu demands—particularly the US collaboration in Israel’s Gaza genocide and its heightened belligerence toward Iran, Venezuela and Greenland.

(The Canary)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

972
 
 

This article by Ivan Evair Saldaña originally appeared in the February 1, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premir left wing daily newspaper. Photos by Jay Watts.

Mexico City. Dozens of protesters, convened by the Mexican Movement of Solidarity with Cuba, gathered this Sunday in front of the former United States embassy in Mexico, on Paseo de la Reforma, to condemn President Donald Trump’s decree imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to the island and to demand that the government of Claudia Sheinbaum maintain crude oil shipments to Cuba.

“Mexican oil for the Cubans!” they chanted.

During the event, from a platform and microphone, a statement from the Movement was read denouncing the US president’s decision as a unilateral and extraterritorial measure that violates international law and prolongs the economic blockade in place for more than 60 years, which it described as a systematic policy of suffocation against the Cuban population.

“We denounce this decision as not an isolated incident, but rather the continuation of an economic war waged for over sixty years through the criminal blockade imposed against Cuba. This blockade has caused enormous economic damage, limited access to food, medicine, technology, and financing, and directly and daily affects the civilian population. Due to its systematic, prolonged, and deliberate nature, this policy can and must be called what it is: an act of genocide against the Cuban people,” they stated.

For its part, the Internationalist Group / LIVI criticized the government of President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo for allegedly yielding to the will of the United States.

“In the recent negotiations, for example, regarding the free trade agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the United States, Claudia Sheinbaum has responded quite capitulatingly to Donald Trump’s policy of cutting off oil supplies. As we know, since Maduro’s oil extraction in Venezuela, Mexico became the number one supplier of oil to Cuba. However, now Pemex has also warned that it will cut off oil supplies,” said Sherezada Leyva, a member of the Group.

Furthermore, she accused the Morena government of maintaining a policy subordinate to the United States by allowing military exercises by the Southern Command in the Yucatan Peninsula, which —he said— are aimed towards Cuba, and of reinforcing a restrictive immigration policy in the north of the country through the National Guard.

At the event, the organizations and the José Martí Association of Cuban Residents in Mexico called for strengthening international solidarity, demanding an end to the blockade, and supporting the Cuban people, reiterating that “Cuba is not alone.”

  • Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    News Briefs

    Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    The rally condemned US President Trump’s executive order imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba and decried the over 60 year old blockade against the island.

  • Who Will Defend Us?

    Analysis

    Who Will Defend Us?

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    Public officials who are making strategic decisions for the future of our country today must not forget that in the last elections, 36 million citizens elected them to defend our institutions, to defend a sovereign Mexico, and to decisively prevent intervention. We don’t need lukewarm, confusing positions.

  • People’s Mañanera January 30

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera January 30

    January 30, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on reducing violence in Baja California, not sending oil to Cuba, migration, Grupo Salinas tax debt, economic development, and Interoceanic train derailment.

The post Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

973
 
 

This editorial by Antonio Gershenson originally appeared in the February 1, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Very well, so we are insisting that we must protect our sovereignty. It is unacceptable that, at this point, given the grievances and outbursts of the irresponsible president of the United States, we should stand idly by and decide whether to fully defend or only partially defend our energy sovereignty.

Here we are, and we will not back down. This is not a pamphlet; it is a slogan, but it is also the truth. This man—or rather, this abject president—has trampled, chewed up, and spat out pieces of sovereignty, not only of Mexico but also of our sister nations in Latin America.

Let’s not allow it to continue. How are we going to stop it? We need to devise several plans, one of which is to remain steadfast in defending our natural resources.

Apparently, he is no longer interested in Venezuela’s oil; the issue of his incongruous and aggressive activity against all countries is about power and the fact of saying “I’m in charge here”.

Perhaps President Trump knows his days are numbered, and that’s why he’s tightening the screws, that military clamp that can strangle anyone, even the most prepared, not only from a military point of view, but also economically and politically speaking.

This man—or rather, this abject president—has trampled, chewed up, and spat out pieces of sovereignty, not only of Mexico but also of our sister nations in Latin America.

So, let’s review what we’re doing within the 4T government. How should we behave? We are supposedly following the principles of “don’t steal, don’t lie, and don’t betray the people.” In this sense, Mexican institutions have the responsibility to defend Mexicans and their energy sovereignty and, where appropriate, to denounce attacks against the movement for transformation, or against the democracy we are rebuilding.

If this defense by the Mexican government is not happening in reality, if behind national institutions such as the Ministry of Economy, the Ministry of Energy, the Federal Electricity Commission, and Petróleos Mexicanos, those enclaves of capitalism, neoliberalism, and the whole host of corrupt individuals who have ruined our country’s economy are still hidden, then let’s ask ourselves, what is happening?

We therefore have the right to know and review the decisions being designed and implemented in offices like Marcelo Ebrard’s, or any other. Let’s remember that government agencies are not entirely free of neoliberal practices and ideology, despite the arrival of the Fourth Transformation (4T). Many decision-makers will continue to bury their heads in the sand, throwing stones and hiding their hands, contrary to the principles of dignity, justice, and Mexican humanism championed by this government.

In this regard, it is imperative to review who holds the strategic decision-making power for the defense of our resources and our country as a whole. There can be no pretense or irresponsible, ignorant, or politically and socially insensitive attitudes, as we have discussed on other occasions in this opinion column.

The public officials who are making strategic decisions for the future of our country today must not forget that in the last elections, 36 million citizens elected them to defend our institutions, to defend a sovereign Mexico, and to decisively prevent intervention. We don’t need lukewarm, confusing positions that fail to provide clarity about what is really happening to our country in the international arena, but we also don’t want unnecessary unilateral grandstanding.

We need certainty regarding the positions and definitions that will be adopted in the upcoming USMCA negotiations, among other future agreements, which must align with the commitments that President Claudia Sheinbaum’s current administration has made to millions of Mexicans. And if the treaty ultimately disappears, it won’t be a tragedy; it would be the beginning of true economic independence, which is what we desperately need.

For Trump we appear irrelevant, but in truth, without Mexico’s support, the United States will have problems.

We insist that we need economic certainty, political certainty, and social stability. Without these components, we cannot speak of a just, productive, and developed society, because we will always be on the defensive against neoliberals.

  • Who Will Defend Us?

    Analysis

    Who Will Defend Us?

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    This editorial by Antonio Gershenson originally appeared in the February 1, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. Very well, so we are insisting that we must protect our sovereignty. It is unacceptable that, at this point, given the grievances and outbursts of the irresponsible president of the United States, we…

  • People’s Mañanera January 30

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera January 30

    January 30, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on reducing violence in Baja California, not sending oil to Cuba, migration, Grupo Salinas tax debt, economic development, and Interoceanic train derailment.

  • Debt on the Installment Plan: Salinas Pliego Pays $10B MXN; $22B in Installments

    News Briefs

    Debt on the Installment Plan: Salinas Pliego Pays $10B MXN; $22B in Installments

    January 30, 2026

    The ultra-right winger and tax evader fumes, but begins to pay his debt piece-by-piece, but with less punitive measures than his Grupo Elektra receives.

The post Who Will Defend Us? appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

974
 
 

US diplomat Laura Dogu arrived in Caracas as the US government’s envoy to Venezuela, part of the agenda between the governments of the two countries to establish a roadmap on matters of mutual interest and to address differences through diplomatic dialogue in accordance with international law.

The foreign affairs minister of Venezuela, Yván Gil, reported on Saturday, January 31, that US diplomat Laura Dogu had arrived in Caracas, landing at Simón Bolívar International Airport in Maiquetía, La Guaira state.

He added that the agenda includes addressing and resolving existing differences through diplomatic dialogue and on the basis of mutual respect and international law.

For its part, the US Embassy in Venezuela posted on its social media accounts a photograph of Dogu deboarding from the plane at the Simón Bolívar International Airport, along with a message from the diplomat, “I just arrived in Venezuela. My team and I are ready to work.”

Recently, the Trump administration announced the appointment of Laura Dogu as its new chief of mission for the US External Office for Venezuela that functions from Bogotá, Colombia. The information was released on the US Embassy’s website.

Laura Dogu is a career diplomat who has served in Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras, in addition to serving as a Foreign Policy Advisor to the US Army Chief of Staff and as Deputy Director of the FBI’s Foreign Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell.

Venezuela and United States have not had formal diplomatic relations since February 2019, when the US government recognized the self-proclaimed “interim president” of Venezuela, Juan Guaidó and launched a total blockade against the country. At that time, Venezuela severed diplomatic relations with Washington and the US embassy in Caracas was closed. It remains closed to this day, and the US maintains an “External Office for Venezuela” in the capital of Colombia.

US Labor Independence and Solidarity with Venezuela

On January 16, 2026, the acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, announced the undertaking of a bilateral cooperation agenda with the United States as part of an “exploratory mission” to investigate conditions for resuming formal diplomatic relations with the US, which she said was part of President Nicolás Maduro’s agenda. She stated that Venezuela would embrace this relation without fear and reiterated the country’s willingness to move forward into an era of mutual respect.

Rodríguez specified that the diplomatic and economic agenda would prioritize cooperation in strategic sectors such as energy, trade, and finance, with a vision strictly oriented toward the well-being of the Venezuelan people, and based on balance and reciprocity.

On January 27,  she confirmed the establishment of diplomatic channels with the US government and a work agenda based on dialogue and mutual respect.

“We have proposed that our differences be resolved through diplomatic dialogue,” she said, and at the same time underscoring Venezuela’s sovereign stance: “The people of Venezuela do not accept orders from any foreign power.”

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

975
 
 

The US Department of Justice has released millions of new documents linked to the case of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, before removing some pages that contained complaints mentioning US President Donald Trump.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said on Friday, January 30, that approximately 3.5 million files were published to comply with the Epstein Transparency Act, following criticism that the administration had missed a December 19 deadline set by Congress.

The documents include FBI communications and complaints submitted as tips, some of which list comments mentioning Trump and others who had social or professional ties to Epstein.

Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to his past association with Epstein.

Pages removed from DOJ website
After their publication, pages containing complaints that mentioned Trump were removed from the DOJ website and now return a “page not found” message. Copies of the documents, however, have circulated widely on social media. CNN anchor Jake Tapper was among those who publicly noted that the pages had been taken down.

One complaint, filed by a friend of a victim, says Trump forced a girl aged 13-14 to perform “oral sex” approximately 35 years ago in New Jersey. The document states that an investigator was sent to Washington to conduct an interview.

Another complaint says Trump regularly paid an individual to perform sexual acts and adds that he was present when her newborn child was murdered by a relative. The paperwork notes that there was “no contact made” with the complainant.

A separate complaint, which provided no contact information, said “calendar girls” parties at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago involved children and sexual abuse. The document also names several public figures as present at such events.

In another account, a complainant said that they witnessed a “sex trafficking ring” at Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, in the mid-1990s. The person noted “threats” from Trump’s head of security if she spoke publicly about what she had seen.

Secret Behind Jeffrey Epstein’s Mysterious Wealth Reportedly Disclosed Amid Sex Trafficking Probe

Bill Gates mentioned in the files
The latest release also includes a draft email Epstein wrote to himself in 2013, referring to Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. In the message, Epstein said Gates asked him to delete emails and referenced “personal matters.”

The DOJ has not provided a detailed explanation for why certain pages were removed after publication. The department said the document release was ongoing.

(PressTV)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›