Latin American Publications!

121 readers
16 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
551
 
 

During an Iftar dinner held at the Presidential Complex in Ankara, the president emphasized that, despite the ceasefire in effect since October 10, 2025, the Israeli government is maintaining and intensifying its military actions against Gaza and the West Bank.

Erdogan noted that since October 11, at least 615 Palestinians have been killed and nearly 2,000 wounded as a result of Israeli attacks.

He also denounced the fact that the entry of humanitarian aid into the coastal enclave continues to face serious obstacles, and criticized the restrictions imposed at the Rafah border crossing, which he described as a vital point for the Gazan population.

The president recalled that on October 8, 2023, Israel launched a large-scale offensive against Gaza, with US backing, which, according to Palestinian figures, resulted in more than 72,000 deaths and 171,000 injuries, mostly women and children, in addition to severe damage to infrastructure.

Despite the ceasefire agreement, Palestinian authorities report almost daily violations that cause new casualties and material destruction.

abo/arm/mem/fm

The post Erdogan highlights Palestinian people’s steadfastness in Gaza first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

552
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

2026 Electoral Reform: Votes Decide, Not Elites

The Electoral Reform bill has four main planks: direct voting in the case of proportional representation candidates, reducing the cost of elections, greater financial oversight and transparency, and strengthening participatory democracy.

President Claudia Sheinbaum was clear: the reform seeks more democracy. It maintains 500 congressional deputies and 96 senators but eliminates party lists or slates so citizens directly elect their representatives. It proposes cutting spending on elections by 25%, bans bots, and regulates AI. The Preliminary Electoral Results Program (PREP) will be eliminated so results are known quickly and costs decrease.

Sheinbaum warned that some won’t want to approve the proposal, but voters will judge those parties at the ballot box.

Housing for Well-Being in Oaxaca

Housing was delivered in San Jacinto Amilpas as part of a humanist project. Governor Salomón Jara noted that the land was donated by the state government. Infonavit director Octavio Romero reported that construction of 5,000 homes has begun in Oaxaca, with 7,000 more to come, advancing the population’s right to housing.

Jalisco Operation: Coordination Yes, but Under Mexican Leadership

Following Donald Trump’s statements on the killing of leading drug kingpin Nemesio Oseguera, the President reiterated that the government has already explained the mechanics that were involved. The U.S. provided important information, but the operation was planned and executed by the Mexican Armed Forces.

Mexico-U.S. Diplomatic Relations

Sheinbaum clarified that the Security Cabinet meeting with U.S. Ambassador Ronald Johnson had been previously scheduled and is unrelated to the weekend operation. She described the encounter as cordial and part of the ongoing understanding and coordination between the two countries.

Lie Detector: Truth vs. Disinformation

  • It is not true that that organized crime threatened or attacked the civilian population.
  • It is not true that that Guadalajara Airport was taken over by organized crime or set on fire.
  • It is not true that that U.S. tourists were taken hostage.
  • It is not true that that BBVA closed branches or suspended banking operations on a national level.
  • It is not true that that a U.S. agent participated in or caused the death of Rubén “N.”
  • It is not true that that the Senate approved the participation of U.S. Marines in the operation.
  • It is not true that foreign agents intervened in the arrest of the drug lord.
  • It is not true that that the National Security Strategy has changed or is the same as that of former President Enrique Calderón.

The post People’s Mañanera February 25 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

553
 
 

Venezuela denounced the forced opening of its diplomatic pouch at Panama’s Tocumen International Airport, calling the incident a violation of the Vienna Convention and demanding guarantees of non-repetition from Panamanian authorities.

The Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, through an official statement, formally denounced the forced opening of its diplomatic pouch at Tocumen International Airport, Panama.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yvan Gil, denounced the incident, which occurred on Tuesday, February 24, via his Telegram channel. The act represents a direct and flagrant violation of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, in which Article 27 clearly establishes the inviolability of the diplomatic pouch, which cannot be opened or detained under any circumstances.

Text reads:

“The Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela denounces the events that occurred on February 24, 2026, when the opening of the Venezuelan diplomatic pouch was forced at the Tocumen International Airport in Panama City, Panama.”

Therefore, the authorities warned that this act violates the right to identity of Venezuelans residing in Panamanian territory.

Venezuela and Cuba Reaffirm Solidarity as Delcy Rodríguez Warns of Foreign-Backed Plots Against Peace

The official statement explains that “the immunity of diplomatic communications is an essential principle for coexistence between nations. Its violation sets a dangerous precedent that affects the legal security of our missions and infringes upon the right to identity of the Venezuelan community residing in Panamanian territory.”

“In light of this outrage, the Bolivarian Government demands full guarantees of non-repetition. It urges the Panamanian authorities to strictly comply with the regulations governing diplomatic and consular activity, considering the willingness expressed by both governments to reactivate consular services”, the statement concludes.

The official note considers the willingness expressed by both governments to reactivate consular services as a relevant factor in compliance with the regulations governing diplomatic and consular activity.

(Telesur)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

554
 
 

By Ben Norton  –  Feb 18, 2026

Speaking to EU leaders at the Munich Security Conference, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave a pro-colonialist speech calling to revive “great Western empires” and “build a new Western century” based on exploiting the Global South.

The West’s global dominance has been in serious decline for several decades. The US government wants to reverse this by undoing the progress made by decolonization and reimposing Western hegemony on the world — by force.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered an overtly pro-colonialist speech to European leaders, in which he praised “the great Western empires” and said North America and Europe should unite to “build a new Western century”, based on the subjugation of the Global South.

Speaking on behalf of the Donald Trump administration, Rubio made it clear that what Washington has done to GazaVenezuela, and Cuba is what it now hopes to do to the rest of the Global South — which represents 86% of the world population, and therefore constitutes the Global Majority.

Marco Rubio’s pro-colonialist speech at the 2026 Munich Security ConferenceMarco Rubio is the second-most-powerful person in the US government, after Donald Trump. He is serving as both secretary of state and national security advisor. (Rubio is just the second person in US history to simultaneously hold the two positions, following notorious war criminal Henry Kissinger.)

Rubio spoke at the Munich Security Conference in Germany on February 14.

He was surrounded by prominent EU officials, who gave a standing ovation and applauded Rubio’s explicitly pro-colonialist remarks.

The top US foreign-policy official revealed that the US empire wants to reverse the gains made by the anti-colonial struggles in the latter half of the 20th century, and he portrayed decolonization as a sinister plot by “godless communists”.

These were Rubio’s comments (all emphasis added):

For five centuries, before the end of the Second World War, the West had been expanding – its missionaries, its pilgrims, its soldiers, its explorers pouring out from its shores to cross oceans, settle new continentsbuild vast empires extending out across the globe.

But in 1945, for the first time since the age of Columbus, it was contracting. Europe was in ruins. Half of it lived behind an Iron Curtain and the rest looked like it would soon follow. The great Western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come.

Against that backdrop, then, as now, many came to believe that the West’s age of dominance had come to an end and that our future was destined to be a faint and feeble echo of our past. But together, our predecessors recognized that decline was a choice, and it was a choice they refused to make. This is what we did together once before, and this is what President Trump and the United States want to do again now, together with you.

And this is why we do not want our allies to be weak, because that makes us weaker. We want allies who can defend themselves so that no adversary will ever be tempted to test our collective strength. This is why we do not want our allies to be shackled by guilt and shame. We want allies who are proud of their culture and of their heritage, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization, and who, together with us, are willing and able to defend it.

And this is why we do not want allies to rationalize the broken status quo rather than reckon with what is necessary to fix it, for we in America have no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West’s managed decline. We do not seek to separate, but to revitalize an old friendship and renew the greatest civilization in human history. What we want is a reinvigorated alliance that recognizes that what has ailed our societies is not just a set of bad policies but a malaise of hopelessness and complacency. An alliance – the alliance that we want is one that is not paralyzed into inaction by fear – fear of climate change, fear of war, fear of technology. Instead, we want an alliance that boldly races into the future. And the only fear we have is the fear of the shame of not leaving our nations prouder, stronger, and wealthier for our children.

It is worth noting that Marco Rubio’s reactionary red-baiting fails to get even basic facts right. The hammer and sickle on a communist flag are not red; they are yellow. It is the flag itself that is red. But this only further illustrates Rubio’s extreme ignorance of history.

The point is that Rubio used his global platform to regurgitate far-right disinformation, demonizing the anti-colonial struggles of the Global South as an evil communist conspiracy, and vowing to reverse them.

The US secretary of state asserted that Washington will not accept the fact that “the West’s age of dominance had come to an end”, and will use all the tools at its disposable — including and especially military force — to “build a new Western century” and “renew the greatest civilization in human history”.

More Shockingly Honest Confessions From the Empire Managers

Rubio tells the West to stop apologizing for its colonial crimesMarco Rubio also told the European leaders who were sitting around him at the Munich Security Conference that they must stop apologizing for the colonialist crimes against humanity that their countries committed in the Global South.

“We do not want our allies to be shackled by guilt and shame”, Rubio declared. “We want allies who are proud of their culture and of their heritage, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization, and who, together with us, are willing and able to defend it”.

In fact, the top US foreign-policy official disputed the undeniable historical fact that Western empires carried out monstrous atrocities.

Rubio insisted that the West must not “atone for the purported sins of past generations”. By using the term “purported”, Rubio was calling into question whether or not they actually were sins; he was whitewashing the horrific history of colonialism, in which the Western imperial powers colonized the vast majority of the world, killed hundreds of millions of people, and enslaved many millions more.

The US secretary of state declared that the West should be proud of these colonial crimes.

“Armies fight for a way of life. And that is what we are defending: a great civilization that has every reason to be proud of its history”, he proclaimed.

Top European officials give Marco Rubio a standing ovation after his pro-colonialist speech at the 2026 Munich Security Conference

The European Union gives Rubio’s far-right, pro-colonialist speech a standing ovationMeanwhile, Rubio’s far-right, pro-colonialist diatribe was being applauded by the same EU officials who often bloviate about so-called “democracy” and “human rights” and love to lecture Global South countries for supposedly not being enlightened enough.

The Western media’s coverage of Rubio’s speech erased his pro-colonialist rhetoric and made it all about the US reaffirming Europe that they will stay together in a cozy transatlantic alliance, despite Trump’s aggressive tariffs.

After Rubio concluded his remarks, the moderator of the Munich Security Conference, the German diplomat Wolfgang Ischinger, thanked him profusely.

“Mr. Secretary, I’m not sure you heard the sigh of relief through this hall when we were just listening to what I would interpret as a message of reassurance, of partnership”, Ischinger said.

“You spoke of intertwined relations between the United States and Europe”, the German diplomat effused. “Thank you for offering this message of reassurance about our partnership”.

German diplomat Wolfgang Ischinger praises Marco Rubio at the Munich Security Conference on February 14, 2026

Rubio identifies with European colonialists, not Latin Americans — and he denies the genocide of Native AmericansThroughout his speech, Marco Rubio emphasized that colonialism links the United States and Europe in a transatlantic imperial bond.

Rubio repeatedly stressed that United States is itself a European colonial creation. He stated:

For the United States and Europe, we belong together. America was founded 250 years ago, but the roots began here on this continent long before. The man who settled and built the nation of my birth arrived on our shores carrying the memories and the traditions and the Christian faith of their ancestors as a sacred inheritance, an unbreakable link between the old world and the new.

We are part of one civilization – Western civilization.

… for us Americans, our home may be in the Western Hemisphere, but we will always be a child of Europe.

Rubio similarly made it clear that he personally identifies with European colonialists.

Although Rubio’s family is technically of Cuban descent, he made no mention of this in his speech. Instead, Rubio stressed that his ancestors came from modern-day Italy and Spain.

Rubio sees himself, proudly, as a child of the European colonial elites of the Americas, rejecting his Cuban heritage. He admires the European colonizers, the conquistadores, who traveled to Latin America, declared themselves the ruling classes, and carried out horrific crimes against humanity against the indigenous populations.

This is what Rubio said:

… for us Americans, our home may be in the Western Hemisphere, but we will always be a child of Europe.

Our story began with an Italian explorer whose adventure into the great unknown to discover a new world brought Christianity to the Americas – and became the legend that defined the imagination of a our pioneer nation.

Our first colonies were built by English settlers, to whom we owe not just the language we speak but the whole of our political and legal system. Our frontiers were shaped by Scots-Irish – that proud, hearty clan from the hills of Ulster that gave us Davy Crockett and Mark Twain and Teddy Roosevelt and Neil Armstrong.

Our great midwestern heartland was built by German farmers and craftsmen who transformed empty plains into a global agricultural powerhouse – and by the way, dramatically upgraded the quality of American beer. (Laughter.)

Our expansion into the interior followed the footsteps of French fur traders and explorers whose names, by the way, still adorn the street signs and towns’ names all across the Mississippi Valley. Our horses, our ranches, our rodeos – the entire romance of the cowboy archetype that became synonymous with the American West – these were born in Spain. And our largest and most iconic city was named New Amsterdam before it was named New York.

And do you know that in the year that my country was founded, Lorenzo and Catalina Geroldi lived in Casale Monferrato in the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia. And Jose and Manuela Reina lived in Sevilla, Spain. I don’t know what, if anything, they knew about the 13 colonies which had gained their independence from the British empire, but here’s what I am certain of: They could have never imagined that 250 years later, one of their direct descendants would be back here today on this continent as the chief diplomat of that infant nation. And yet here I am, reminded by my own story that both our histories and our fates will always be linked.

When Rubio claimed that European colonizers in the modern-day United States “transformed empty plains into a global agricultural powerhouse”, he was engaging in overt genocide genial.

The US secretary of state erased the objective historical fact that European colonizers killed tens of millions of Native Americans, ethnically cleansed them, and stole their land. According to Rubio, these inhabited lands were mere “empty plains”.

Anti-communism unites the WestWhile he denied and whitewashed the genocidal crimes of colonialism, Marco Rubio stressed that the basis of “Western civilization” is fundamentally predicated on capitalism.

The US secretary of state emphasized that anti-communism is a point of unity between Washington and Brussels. He proclaimed:

When this conference began in 1963, it was in a nation – actually, it was on a continent – that was divided against itself. The line between communism and freedom ran through the heart of Germany. The first barbed fences of the Berlin Wall had gone up just two years prior.

And just months before that first conference, before our predecessors first met here, here in Munich, the Cuban Missile Crisis had brought the world to the brink of nuclear destruction. Even as World War II still burned fresh in the memory of Americans and Europeans alike, we found ourselves staring down the barrel of a new global catastrophe – one with the potential for a new kind of destruction, more apocalyptic and final than anything before in the history of mankind.

At the time of that first gathering, Soviet communism was on the march. Thousands of years of Western civilization hung in the balance. At that time, victory was far from certain. But we were driven by a common purposeWe were unified not just by what we were fighting against; we were unified by what we were fighting for. And together, Europe and America prevailed and a continent was rebuilt. Our people prospered. In time, the East and West blocs were reunited. A civilization was once again made whole.

When we found ourselves divided once again by the Iron Curtain, the free West linked arms with the courageous dissidents struggling against tyranny in the East to defeat Soviet communism.

It must be mentioned that, during the First Cold War, the US empire joined the European empires in violently opposing most of the anti-colonial movements and propping up racist colonial regimes.

On the other side, the Soviet Union and the Socialist Bloc supported the anti-colonial struggles in the Global South, providing national-liberation movements with weapons, technical assistance, diplomatic backing, and other forms of aid.

This does not mean that all of the anti-colonial movements were evil plots by “godless communists”, as Rubio argued in his speech.

But it is certainly true that the national-liberation struggles were supported by socialist countries, and opposed by capitalist ones.

Rubio calls for a new Western supply chain that cuts out ChinaIn his speech, Rubio strongly insinuated that the West should ally together once again in Cold War Two, this time against the People’s Republic of China.

Although he did not directly name China, Rubio heavily implied that this is the shared adversary of “Western civilization”.

Rubio argued that China was supposedly trying to destroy the West by deindustrializing their economies. He did not mention that it was Western capitalists who voluntarily moved their factories to China and other countries in the Global South in order to exploit lower paid workers.

Instead, Rubio portrayed the deindustrialization of Western neoliberal capitalist economies as an evil Chinese plot, and he argued that the US and Europe should work together to reindustrialize, isolate China, and develop “a Western supply chain for critical minerals”.

These were his remarks:

… we embraced a dogmatic vision of free and unfettered trade, even as some nations protected their economies and subsidized their companies to systematically undercut ours – shuttering our plants, resulting in large parts of our societies being deindustrialized, shipping millions of working and middle-class jobs overseas, and handing control of our critical supply chains to both adversaries and rivals.

Deindustrialization was not inevitable. It was a conscious policy choice, a decades-long economic undertaking that stripped our nations of their wealth, of their productive capacity, and of their independence. And the loss of our supply chain sovereignty was not a function of a prosperous and healthy system of global trade. It was foolish. It was a foolish but voluntary transformation of our economy that left us dependent on others for our needs and dangerously vulnerable to crisis.

Mass migration is not, was not, isn’t some fringe concern of little consequence. It was and continues to be a crisis which is transforming and destabilizing societies all across the West. Together we can reindustrialize our economies and rebuild our capacity to defend our people. But the work of this new alliance should not be focused just on military cooperation and reclaiming the industries of the past. It should also be focused on, together, advancing our mutual interests and new frontiers, unshackling our ingenuity, our creativity, and the dynamic spirit to build a new Western century. Commercial space travel and cutting-edge artificial intelligence; industrial automation and flex manufacturing; creating a Western supply chain for critical minerals not vulnerable to extortion from other powers; and a unified effort to compete for market share in the economies of the Global South. Together we can not only take back control of our own industries and supply chains – we can prosper in the areas that will define the 21st century.

Rubio’s insistence that Western corporations must control the “market share in the economies of the Global South” illustrates how Washington considers the Global South to be little more than a market for US goods and a region that must be dominated by West, with no regard for its sovereignty.

(Geopolitical Economy Report)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

555
 
 

This article by Clara Zepeda originally appeared in the January 24, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Mexico City. The country needs more information about how the nation’s wealthiest citizens pay their taxes. “There is a clear lack of tax transparency in this area, unlike in the rest of the world. In Mexico, for every 100 pesos of federal tax revenue, billionaires, as individuals, contribute only 21 cents,” stated Carlos Brown, Director of Programs at Oxfam Mexico.

While available tax data is relatively extensive for lower-income groups, it becomes vague or nonexistent when it comes to the wealthiest people in the country, limiting public scrutiny of the tax system, warned the author of Oligarchy or Democracy: Nine Proposals Against the Extreme Accumulation of Power.

During a discussion about the report, Brown asserted that “the lack of disaggregated data on tax payments also makes it difficult to challenge deeply entrenched narratives, such as the idea that large fortunes sustain the national economy or that certain groups, such as those working in the informal sector, do not contribute fiscally to society.”

Alejandra Haas, executive director of Oxfam Mexico, highlighted that the organization made nine proposals against the extreme concentration of wealth, and among them, those focused directly on the care system stand out, which consist of promoting inclusive policies with collective participation and developing social infrastructure to redistribute unpaid work.

“A care system can at least fix the issue of time,” Haas said during the presentation of the study; and she specified that freeing up hours of unpaid work would allow women to decide whether they want to enter the labor market or participate in politics.

The head of the agency also warned that without a progressive tax reform, it will be difficult to finance this and other transformations.

The meeting also included Gerardo Esquivel, former deputy governor of the Bank of Mexico and author of the first report that Oxfam made for Mexico.

The economist stressed that Mexico needs to get back on the path of faster economic growth, or at least return to the 2 percent annual growth rate of previous years, in order to continue with a redistributive process; likewise, fiscal transparency is required in order to stop being one of the most unequal countries in the world.

The professor from El Colegio de México also asserted that it is necessary to combine a series of policies that help economic growth and the redistribution of resources.

The progress made in the last six years, and part of this one, to combat inequality, such as the increase in the minimum wage, stands out, Esquivel commented; however, he pointed out that a progressive tax reform could further combat inequality.

The post Oxfam: Billionaires Contribute Only 21 Cents per 100 Pesos of Tax appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

556
 
 

This article by Juan Luis Ramos originally appeared in the February 25, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

Working poverty in Mexico ended 2025 at 32.3 percent of the population, representing an annual reduction of 3.1 percentage points compared to the previous year, the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) reported on Wednesday.

However, this means that almost a third of the population did not have enough work income to purchase the food basket at the end of the year.

According to the Labour Poverty data for the fourth quarter of 2025, in rural areas the decrease was 4.1 points, going from 50.7 to 46.6 percent between the end of 2024 and a year later.

As for urban areas, the indicator fell 2.7 points, going from 30.8 to 28.1 percent.

The indicator measures the percentage of the population whose labour income is less than the monetary value of the food basket, and is calculated with information from the National Survey of Occupation and Employment (ENOE).

In its quarterly comparison, working poverty also declined. Between the third and fourth quarters of 2025, it fell from 34.3 to 32.3 percent nationally, a decrease of two percentage points.

The behavior was accompanied by an increase in real per capita labour income, which grew 5.3 percent annually, going from 3,294.97 to 3,468.71 pesos per month in real terms, according to INEGI.

In rural areas of the country, the increase in income was 8.3 percent and in urban areas 4.3 percent.

The average monthly income of the employed population was 7,674.56 pesos at the end of the year. Formal employment reported an average income of 10,609.74 pesos, while informal employment reported an average income of 5,455.61 pesos.

The post Working Poverty in Mexico Decreases in 2025 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

557
 
 

This article originally appeared in the February 24, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Mexico City. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Sader) reported that on the first day of territorial operation for the payment of incentives to white corn producers, 3,514 applications were received in the states of Campeche, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacán, Querétaro and Tlaxcala, corresponding to the 2025 spring-summer agricultural cycle.

The states where the most applications were received are Jalisco, with 1,131, and Guanajuato, with 775.

At the direction of Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, Secretary Julio Berdegué Sacristán implemented a streamlined operational process (published last Friday) to make the procedure faster and more transparent. He also established a robust field operation to ensure that support reaches producers directly and promptly.

Those who met the eligibility requirements for the support program will receive their payments this week via their bank cards. To ensure efficient coverage, the federal and state governments are joining forces to provide timely assistance to farmers through Rural Development Districts (DDR), Rural Development Support Centers (CADER), and Representative Offices of the Federal Entities (OREF)—strategically distributed throughout the six states.

The post Mexican Agricultural Secretariat Receives 3,514 Applications for Corn Producer Subsidies appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

558
 
 

This article by Giselle Soriano originally appeared in the February 24, 2026 edition of Milenio.

The Ministry of Economy (SE), through the Mexican Institute of Intellectual Property (IMPI), granted the declaration of protection to the geographical indication for Pulque de Tlaxcala.

Through a publication in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF), it was established that the declaration of this product will come into effect on February 25.

The decentralized public body delimited 25 municipalities in the state of Tlaxcala as a protected geographical area: Atltzayanca, Apizaco, Atlangatepec, Calpulalpan, Chiautempan, Contla de Juan Cuamatzi, Españita, Huamantla, Hueyotlipan, Ixtacuixtla de Mariano Matamoros, Muñoz de Domingo Arenas, Nanacamilpa de Mariano Arista, Panotla, San José Teacalco, Sanctorum of Lázaro Cárdenas, Teolocholco, Terrenate, Tetla de la Solidaridad, Tlaxcala, Tlaxco, Tocatlán, Tzompantepec, Xaloztoc, Xaltocan and Yauhquemehcan.

This is in order to identify an alcoholic beverage of pre-Hispanic origin that is obtained from the heart of the maguey leaves and is made from the fermentation of the mucilage, popularly known as aguamiel.

“It is obtained through the fermentation process of the aguamiel that is extracted from the pulque maguey, also known as Agave salmiana, a succulent plant that has 136 species, 26 subspecies, 29 varieties and 7 forms of magueys.”

“The pulque produced in Tlaxcala is characterized by a consistency of a subtly higher viscosity, attributed mainly to the synthesis of dextrins by strains of Leuconostoc spp. during fermentation, which gives it that dense body that is appreciated when the drink is shaken,” the document reads.

Furthermore, it specifies that the specific characteristics of Pulque from Tlaxcala are essentially attributable to its geographical origin, which includes natural factors, such as the local varieties of maguey, the climate and soils of the Tlaxcalan Highlands, as well as “human factors represented in the ancestral knowledge transmitted from generation to generation by the tlachiqueros.”

It also stipulates that only producers established in these municipalities and who comply with the rules of use may use the name Pulque de Tlaxcala.

Regarding its marketing, the document detailed that it is sold directly by authorized producers, in traditional pulquerías, local markets, fairs and through regional distribution channels.

“Prices may vary depending on the product presentation and volume,” he pointed out. Furthermore, the IMPI highlighted that the validity of the protection of the geographical indication will be indefinite, or until the institute issues another declaration in this regard.

The Institute explained that it is enough to meet just one criterion attributable to geographic origin for the area to be considered protected.

In this regard, he emphasized that the geographical indication must include natural as well as human factors that give specific characteristics to the product.

Meanwhile, it was emphasized that the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property will carry out the necessary procedures for the international recognition of this geographical indication, in accordance with the treaties and trade agreements signed by Mexico.

The post Mexico Grants Official Protection to Pulque from Tlaxcala appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

559
 
 

Nicaragua submitted its response to the preliminary objections filed by Germany before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its case with the aim of compeling Germany to stop providing political, financial and military support to Israel amid the Zionist entity’s “campaign of destruction” against the Palestinian people.

On Monday, February 23, Nicaragua presented its written response to Germany’s preliminary objections on jurisdiction and admissibility in the case “regarding the failure to comply with certain international obligations with respect to the occupied Palestinian territory.”

Nicaragua’s written response concerning the preliminary objections and admissibility were submitted in a timely manner, as required by the ICJ in its procedural order.

The filing “has been submitted in fulfillment of Nicaragua’s international obligations to take all necessary measures to halt violations of the most fundamental norms of international law against the Palestinian people.”

Nicaragua also reaffirmed “its firm commitment to the rule of law at the international level and the peaceful settlement of disputes between states.”

On April 8, 2024, Nicaragua requested the ICJ to order Germany to cease providing political, financial and military support to the Zionist entity “in light of its campaign of destruction” against the Palestinian people, arguing that the German support violates the Genocide Convention.

Germany ‘Pathetic’ To Send Aid to Gaza While Arming Israel: Nicaragua Tells ICJ

At that time, Nicaragua also urged Germany to differentiate its commitment to the “Jewish people” from that to the “Israeli government.” Later that same month, however, the ICJ declined to order provisional measures to halt Germany’s arms sales to Israel.

Nicaragua maintains that Germany is violating the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, established after the Holocaust. It also alleges that Berlin is facilitating the commission of genocide in Gaza by withdrawing its funding from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

For its part, Germany claimed at the ICJ that Israel’s security is “at the center” of German foreign policy and has rejected Nicaragua’s accusations that it is facilitating genocide in Gaza through its arms sales to the Zionist entity.

(Telesur English)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

560
 
 

This article by Alejandro Cruz Flores originally appeared in the February 25, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Mexico City. The Mexico City government assured that the migrant encampment in the Vallejo area will be dismantled through dialogue.

“This is in no way about attacking migrants, but it must be said that they do not want to leave the streets to go to a better place,” said the head of the capital’s government, Clara Brugada.

In that regard, she said that he continues to talk with the families who are there to reach agreements and convince them to go to a shelter with better living conditions.

“The goal is not to do anything violent, but to coordinate and talk with them,” said the head of the local executive, who added that her administration is addressing the issue with full guarantee of the human rights of that population.

In that regard, she emphasized that actions have been taken for their benefit, such as the creation of a registry; they were given a credential so that they can have access, for example, to health services; it has even been guaranteed that the children can enter any school in the city.

In that regard, the local government secretary, César Cravioto, indicated that of the 3,000 migrants who had been sleeping on the streets at the beginning of this administration, only 200 remain in that situation.

He added that an agreement was signed with the federal Ministry of Public Education so that all minors in shelters can attend school.

He added that in the case of the Vallejo camp, there are organizations interested in keeping it open, so they have filed injunctions, even though no human right can be fully realized while living in those conditions.

A Better Place

The government has taken steps to ensure better living conditions in shelters, where they have a bed, a roof, spaces to cook, and support to go to hospitals when needed.

“Also, I have to say this. Inside the shelter there are rules, and then there is some substance use, and it’s the parents who don’t want their children to go to a shelter. But we think they should think about their children.”

He noted that the camp is located next to a railway line, where unsafe conditions have also been detected for the families living there.

The post Mexico City Government Claims Will Not Use Violence Against Migrants in Vallejo appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

561
 
 

The Latin American Foundation for Human Rights and Social Development, Fundalatin, has documented 270 deaths and more than 3,000 injuries resulting from political violence in recorded Venezuela between 2002 and 2019— acts of violence promoted by sectors that rejected the Constitution of the Republic.

The details were provided this Monday, February 23, by the president of Fundalatin, María Eugenia Russián, during a meeting led by the acting president Delcy Rodríguez with the victims and relatives of the different stages of political violence in the country to thank them for their participation in the implementation of the Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence, which was sanctioned and promulgated on Thursday, February 19.

Russián emphasized that since 2002, the non-governmental organization she leads has supported victims of both political violence and the unilateral coercive measures imposed by the U.S. government against Venezuela.

Acting President of Venezuela Thanks Victims of 2014 and 2017 Violence for Supporting Amnesty Law

“They are victims of both the sanctions and the violence that erupted in the country when different groups, refusing to recognize the Constitution, turned to violence,” she said.

She noted that, together with the victims, they have consistently affirmed: “You cannot heal the wounds of some only to reopen the wounds of others. We always insist that, under the Amnesty Law, perpetrators must commit to the victims by offering public apologies and ensuring that those painful events—which our country endured and which cost so many Venezuelan families dearly—are never repeated.”

(DiarioVEA) by Yuleidys Hernández Toledo

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

562
 
 

An interview with Francio Vielma, one of Venezuela’s leading experts in the hydrocarbon sector.

Francio Vielma (Barinas, 1979) is one of the most prolific and incisive voices on Venezuela over the past two decades, having accompanied the Chavista process since its inception. A sociologist of development and specialist in public planning, he was Coordinator in the Vice Ministry of Strategic Affairs, attached to the Ministry of the Presidency under Hugo Chávez, and today works as a writer, political analyst, and communicator.

Vielma has also been an analyst for Petróleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA), and is a leading expert on the Venezuelan hydrocarbon sector. In an interview with Diario Red, translated below, the expert explained some of the key aspects of the regulatory reform and reviews the current situation in Venezuela following the US attack on January third.

In the context of the Venezuelan situation, cognitive warfare plays a key role. The recent reform of the Organic Hydrocarbons Law is presented in the media as the keystone of US operations in Venezuela and the reconfiguration of its relations. But what does the reform of the Organic Hydrocarbons Law actually entail? What was the previous situation? How does it differ from it?
The reform to the Organic Hydrocarbons Law should be understood exactly as that, a reform, a partial modification, which is built upon the pillars of the 2001 law. That 2001 law was modified in 2006, and now, two decades later, but the spirit and central elements of the 2001 law are preserved in the current reform.

Certainly, conditions have changed since 2001, and have been changing for a long time. This year’s reform addresses the new realities of Venezuela’s oil industry.

First, the global and Venezuelan oil business is not the same as it was 25 years ago. Globally, we have higher cost structures for oil production, especially for the production of heavy and extra-heavy crude, and we are entering a stage of competition with emerging energy sources in the energy transition.

This suggests that Venezuela warrants extraordinary investment to harness its world’s largest crude oil reserves for the energy transition. This would help meet the demand of 123 million barrels per day (bpd) estimated to be needed by 2050, according to OPEC. Furthermore, 80% of the world’s oil fields are in decline, according to the International Energy Agency. This suggests that countries with large reserves are poised to attract significant investment in the coming years.

The first objective reality is that the Venezuelan state on its own, cannot develop that potential, nor produce heavy crude oil at the high initial investment cost. The country lacks the financial capacity, the technology, and the necessary conditions.

The second, and crucial, element explains the above. It’s the cycle of the last 10 years: coercive measures, illegal sanctions, a financial blockade, a trade blockade, and ultimately, a naval blockade of Venezuelan crude. Over the last 10 years, Venezuela should have been flooded with investment, but instead, it received strangulation and sanctions. That is the second objective reality.

Neither of these two issues appears as components of Venezuela’s oil dynamics in the 2001 law. This reform, as should be the case with any reform, is conceived in relation to the conditions of the present, so the new reform addresses these issues by giving the Venezuelan State room to maneuver in order to carry out its strategic management from three business schemes provided for in the Law.

First, the State. Petróleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA) remains the exclusive and non-transferable property of the Venezuelan State.

Secondly, the state’s majority ownership in joint ventures, or companies in partnership with foreign partners, is reaffirmed. Chevron, Repsol, and Maurel & Prom, for example, operate under this model. In the sectors where they currently work, they will continue to hold a minority stake with the Venezuelan state.

Third, and this is the new element, new contract models are being created that offer private companies and operators greater comparative advantages. These apply specifically to “green” fields: areas with certified reserves but no existing investment. In these cases, the state remains the sole owner of the crude oil reserves but creates incentives through flexible royalty and tax structures to facilitate investment, which is particularly costly for heavy and extra-heavy crude. The majority of Venezuela’s reserves are of these heavy and extra-heavy crude.

What is the present and future of PDVSA and its operation within the current legal framework and in this new arrangement with foreign or state-owned private companies?
PDVSA and Venezuela are facing a new period of investment and repositioning of their hydrocarbon industry. The country will soon recover some of the ground lost in the last 10 years.

We are confident that oil production will increase, and this will increase Venezuela’s relevance in the energy system.

Venezuela will be one of the recipients of international oil investment. The Orinoco Belt, for example, has such vast reserves and is so extensive that all the world’s major oil companies could operate within it. This is something all stakeholders must understand, and the Hydrocarbons Law creates favorable conditions for all geopolitical actors.

Venezuela, in the revolutionary era, has had a multi-faceted energy policy: It has targeted the United States as a destination market, but also China, India, Europe and the Latin American and Caribbean region.

The current US repositioning suggests, for now, that Chinese and Russian activities in Venezuela will be shut down. But formally, this is nothing new, because these companies have been under sanctions for operating in Venezuela since 2019. Nevertheless, they remain there.

So China and Russia are going to mediate their situation. Eventually, there could be a point of convergence, and if common sense prevails regarding the energy landscape, the United States, China, and Russia could work simultaneously in Venezuela’s fields, just as they did until a few years ago.

Venezuela advocated for favorable licenses for Chevron, mediating with the US government itself. It is now doing the same for Russian and Chinese companies. Therefore, I see it as quite possible that Chinese companies will continue buying Venezuelan crude, or that even, in the coming years, Russian companies will extract Venezuelan crude to send to the United States. The timelines of hydrocarbon geopolitics are not linear or identical to the timelines of US administrations.

Within the same narrative construct of post-January third Venezuela, certain stories, such as the one about oil trade with Israel, have emerged that could seriously damage the country’s political image in the international arena. What lies behind these Bloomberg reports that have proliferated online?
Venezuela and PDVSA remain under pressure and coercion. Regrettably, the United States has taken control of the commercial activity surrounding Venezuelan crude, authorizing companies like Vitol, Trafigura, and others to act as marketing agents or traders for Venezuelan oil.

Bazan Group of Israel purchased that crude oil from Vitol on the secondary market. PDVSA has no ties to Bazan Group, nor is there a direct commercial relationship with that company.

In her political program “Venezuela, Land of Grace,” the opposition led by María Corina Machado proposed privatizing and “reactivating” the oil and gas industry through agency management and a framework designed to attract massive private investment. How does the new management of hydrocarbons by the interim Chavista government oppose or present itself as an alternative to this scenario?
The differences between the current reform to the Hydrocarbons Law and the proposal promoted by the opposition are enormous.

Under the reformed law, PDVSA is non-transferable and exclusively owned by the State. María Corina Machado, however, openly proposed its privatization.

Under the Hydrocarbons Law, resources continue to be classified as public and social property. Machado’s proposal would transfer these resources to a regime of foreign private ownership.

In the approved law, the state remains the majority shareholder in joint ventures. In contrast, Machado’s proposal would eliminate joint ventures, transferring everything to private hands.

The premises on which the opposition’s proposal was based consisted of a clear loss of national sovereignty.

Delcy Rodríguez’s administration, on the other hand, according to the new reform, creates an attractive framework for investment, with numerous incentives, but without undermining the role of the state and the public interest in the resource base. The difference is not only philosophical but also methodological and programmatic.

Could you—with all due caution—draw up an updated portrait of the hydrocarbon sector (extraction, refining, distribution, collection and management of oil revenues…)?
In December, just before the naval oil blockade intensified, Venezuela reached a pumping rate of 1.2 million barrels. In 2025, Venezuela increased its crude oil production by more than 14%. Throughout 2025, Venezuela did not import a single liter of gasoline or diesel. The supply of gas for domestic and industrial use was complete. In January, the first commercial export of LPG took place after achieving national self-sufficiency.

These milestones were achieved despite a blockade, through trade evasion, international alliances that circumvented sanctions, and Venezuelan ingenuity in overcoming sanctions, creating national technological solutions, and resisting the deprivation of equipment and spare parts.

These milestones suggest that in recent years PDVSA adapted to a policy of restrictive sanctions and a deep and extensive trade boycott. Now PDVSA will adapt to a period of limited flexibility and restrictive licenses. We are entering a period of relative flexibility, through licensing. Is this favorable for Venezuela? Yes, to some extent. This is still far from an ideal situation for the Venezuelan hydrocarbon industry, which will require, once again, another resizing of the industry, management methods, and a new period of adaptation.

And finally, as an analyst and expert, beyond the specific issue of hydrocarbons, what is your assessment of the current political situation in Venezuela and the present and future of Chavismo under this new circumstances?
Chavismo, as the country’s leading force, is experiencing an absolutely unprecedented moment. Nothing like what has been seen in Venezuela in the last month has been witnessed in recent history.

This overall situation demands exceptional interpretations and avoids easy conclusions. We Venezuelans call this “playing the Caribbean game.” It’s very difficult to explain, but it’s basically playing with cunning and creativity. For years, the country’s leadership has learned a great deal about creative resilience, strategic prudence, and pragmatic flexibility. If there’s one thing Chavismo has mastered, it’s adaptability while preserving its essential principles.

But now the search for opportunities, the need to buy time, and the need to preserve the domestic front (where Chavismo exerts control and room to maneuver) converge. This is to deal with a very strong adverse asymmetry, favorable to the United States.

We are at a point where political conditions have changed. There is a tense détente taking shape in the energy sector with the United States as a result of the events of January third.

For Venezuela, it was impossible to withstand a naval blockade like the one last November and December, which brought the country closer to absolute collapse.

The Washington government has not achieved a straightforward regime change in Venezuela; Chavismo still governs the country. Maduro’s political team is an undeniable power broker, and the Trump administration has chosen to accept this team as unavoidable, partially easing the embargo through licenses and advancing its oil interests. For them, it is preferable to pursue attainable gains rather than risk everything on an “all or nothing” gamble, or to turn Venezuela into another Iraq, as Trump himself has stated.

Oil has always been the primary driver of US interest in Venezuela. It’s an unavoidable factor. Even during the Chávez era, Venezuela has never been prohibited from selling crude oil to the United States; on the contrary, it was the Americans who canceled deals due to their sanctions. Venezuela has always recognized the United States as one of the world’s largest consumers and a key market for its oil products.

So those are the points that have converged at present, leaving the unprecedented situation that exists.

I believe that President Maduro, from his captivity, still has the best outlook for the future. He has conveyed his message through his son Nicolás, calling for trust, stating that the right actions are being taken, and asking for confidence in his team.

Partial Reform of the Venezuelan Hydrocarbons Law: An Analytical Review

Here I reiterate the premise that political and energy timelines are not linear with the timelines of US administrations. The poet José Antonio Ramos Sucre, a descendant of the Grand Marshal of Ayacucho, wrote in “La Granizada” that “time is an invention of watchmakers.” In politics, this could be applied to the idea that time is also a political construct. “They have their strategy, and we have ours,” said Delcy Rodríguez. It is reckless to speak of outcomes or make predictions right now; rather, this is a time of uncertainty, strategy, and the use of power dynamics, based on the current realities.

Yes, the United States says it controls Venezuela, and yes, they are controlling the flow of oil outflows. But they haven’t changed the regime, as they intended.

They have implemented a regressive policy that has led to their sustained suffocation. They have had to come to terms with Maduro’s team, sidelining the opposition, since they lack the real power to govern the country that Chavismo possesses.

They have had to narrate as their “achievements,” in terms of opening up the oil sector, what is actually the result of their failed policy of strangling Chavismo to force it to capitulate, because that didn’t work.

They had to remove Maduro by force after ten years of maximum pressure failed and the Venezuelan military wouldn’t do the job for them. That was a display of brute force, not real power. It was, rather, a display of strategic weakness. While Trump grapples with political costs, Delcy Rodríguez reaps political benefits. These are also ways of understanding the present. To envision the future, the big question is whether Chavismo will prevail. And the answer is that it already has, because it is a dimension of power—political, identity-based, symbolic, and sociocultural.

(Diario Red) by Irene Zugasti

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

563
 
 

This article by María del Pilar Martínez originally appeared in the February 24, 2026 edition of El Economista.

With 99 votes out of the 103 who were entitled to participate in the election of the general secretary of the Confederation of Mexican Workers (CTM), Tereso Medina Ramírez became the new leader of the labor union for the period 2026-2032 , with the commitment not only to incorporate more women and create new portfolios, but also guaranteeing “that the new face of the CTM will be one of proposal, not of protest,” saying goodbye to corporatism.

During the 17th Ordinary General Assembly, with the Secretary of Labor and Social Welfare (STPS), Marath Bolaños, as a guest —who called on CTM members to be allies in the reform to reduce the workweek from 48 to 40 hours—Medina Ramírez stated that their first priority would be “unity, institutional order, and transparency. We are going to get our house in order with discipline, coordination, and respect for the bylaws. We will give the CTM a face of transparency and approachability to strengthen trust, especially with the new generations of workers.”

“Mexico needs us united; business leaders and unions are complementary.”

Following the official ceremony, attended by hundreds of workers, the new leader made it clear at a press conference that “corporatism has run its course,” and stated that he will not remain indefinitely in the CTM like his predecessors. “I plan to leave on my feet… and no, not for reelection,” he emphasized.

The CTM’s new project includes the creation of new portfolios such as the Secretariat of Urban Development; the Secretariat of Institutional Liaison and Multilateral Affairs; the Secretariat of Linkage and Social Governance; and the Secretariat of Sports.

Furthermore, he stated that “from now on we will strive for gender equity, ensuring that future appointments are made with 50% men and 50% women, or proportionally, because if we are talking about a union, for example, in the mining industry, where there are few women, well, that’s why I’m also speaking in terms of equity, yes, and in terms of proportionality as well. And to that same extent, the CTM will revitalize unionism, promoting women and young people in the country, because, moreover, that is what Mexico’s productive sector demands.”

Corporatism is dead, to be replaced by… corporate tripartism?

New Unionism?

Interviewed at the event, Congressman Alfonso Ramírez Cuéllar, vice-coordinator of Morena, said that with the arrival of Tereso Medina, “I hope there will be a much more forceful action to unionize, organize, and defend millions of workers who still have no organization, who are totally helpless, overexploited, and without recognition.”

He stressed that an important task will be to continue insisting on strengthening family income, and this “is something that has the full support of the President of the Republic.”

Juan José Sierra, president of Coparmex, stated that business leaders hope to maintain dialogue during this new phase for the CTM. “In his speech, he emphasized the importance of maintaining social dialogue, of fostering the unity the country needs to better face these challenges, both externally and internally. Mexico needs us united; business leaders and unions are complementary, and this tripartite dialogue—between unions, government, and employers—must exist.”

Coronation Street

The post Proposals, Not Protests, says Tereso Medina, New Leader of CTM appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

564
 
 

Iran will consider even a “limited strike” by the United States as an act of aggression, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said.

“An act of aggression will remain an act of aggression,” Baghaei told a press briefing on Monday, February 23, answering a question about a possible “limited strike” by the United States.

Iran is drafting a text on a possible deal with the United States, Esmail Baghaei said, dismissing the claims about the alleged conclusion of an interim agreement.

“We are currently at the stage of formulating our positions,” Baghaei told the briefing.

He added that Iran is currently formulating its approach and hopes to hold a new round of talks with the US in the coming days.

Trump Sets Deadline for Iran Deal

“Any negotiation process requires joint action, and there is hope for results if there is goodwill and seriousness on both sides,” Baghaei said.

The second round of Iran-US negotiations regarding Tehran’s nuclear program took place on February 17 in Geneva with Omani mediation.

Earlier, US President Donald Trump said that a “massive armada” was heading toward Iran and expressed hope that Iran would agree to negotiate a “fair and equitable” deal that would entail the complete abolition of nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasized on February 8 that the Islamic Republic insisted on its right to enrich uranium, even if it led to war.

The next round of US-Iran talks will be held in Geneva on February 26, Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi, whose country is acting as a mediator in the talks, said on Sunday.

(Sputnik)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

565
 
 

In episode 97 of Soberanía, hosts José Luis Granados Ceja and Kurt Hackbarth dissect the fallout from the Mexican military’s operation that killed Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera, leader of the powerful Jalisco New Generation Cartel.

The hosts break down what actually happened versus the torrent of disinformation that flooded social media—from AI-generated images of cities in flames to wild claims of U.S. agents strangling the kingpin mid-flight. They examine why the narrative spun so quickly out of control, who benefits from painting Mexico as ungovernable, and the real story behind the cartel’s retaliatory actions.

The episode also covers the US Supreme Court’s tariff ruling that struck down Trump’s emergency powers, its implications for Mexico’s leverage in USMCA talks, and what it means for the ongoing pressure campaign against Cuba.

With their signature blend of on-the-ground knowledge and sharp analysis, José Luis and Kurt separate fact from fiction in a week dominated by fake news, while honoring the 25 National Guard members who lost their lives in the aftermath.


The post Mexico Takes Down El Mencho – Soberanía 97 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

566
 
 

This editorial by the editorial board of La Jornada originally appeared in the February 23, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

The death of the top leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), resulting from a confrontation yesterday morning in Tapalpa, Jalisco, between members of that criminal group and forces from the Secretariat of National Defense, sparked a brutal reaction in several states across the country. Cartel cells blocked highways and streets, set fire to vehicles, branches of the Banco del Bienestar (Bank of Well-being), and Oxxo convenience stores. A riot also broke out at the Puerto Vallarta prison, and attacks were carried out against the National Guard in San Juan de los Lagos, with a preliminary toll of 10 government officers killed and 12 wounded, in addition to one civilian killed in the crossfire.

Clearly, these criminal actions were not only intended to hinder the movement of law enforcement, but also to generate panic and anxiety among the civilian population and affect the beneficiaries of government social programs, the main users of the Welfare Bank, especially in areas where the cartel has had a greater presence.

In parallel with the CJNG’s attacks, a flood of fake and alarmist news was unleashed – many of them originating in the United States – from accounts formally belonging to journalists and commentators as well as from anonymous bot farms, which amplified the effects of the criminal actions.

In that context, it was even claimed that U.S. military personnel killed Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, El Mencho, when in reality the involvement of U.S. authorities was limited to providing supplementary information, within the framework of existing security cooperation agreements. And yet again, voices from the political opposition sought to exploit a difficult national situation to denigrate Claudia Sheinbaum’s government.

Beyond this double campaign of intimidation and confusion, the death of Oseguera Cervantes raises unavoidable questions about what will happen to what is considered the most powerful criminal organization in the country today.

Without diminishing the importance of the blow dealt yesterday by the joint action of the Army, the Air Force and the National Guard, there is precedent for cartels that, after losing their top leader through capture or death in a confrontation, become embroiled in bloody internal clashes for leadership, fragment into antagonistic groups – which gives rise to prolonged scenarios of violence in the regions in which they operate – or become atomized, giving way to small criminal cells that begin to act on their own.

It is hoped that authorities at all three levels of government will have the capacity to prevent consequences like those mentioned and, in the immediate future, to restore public safety in the areas where it was disrupted yesterday. And as for those who are spreading unrest, it is desirable that they understand that their actions are detrimental not only to the current government, but to the country as a whole.

The post Two Fronts to Create Panic appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

567
 
 

The president of the Special Monitoring Commission of the Venezuelan National Assembly (AN) for the Law of Amnesty and Democratic Coexistence, Deputy Jorge Arreaza, reported Tuesday that since the commission’s establishment, it has received 4,203 amnesty applications and granted 3,052 full releases to individuals who already held precautionary measures.

During a press conference, Arreaza explained that as of Monday, 179 releases had been recorded, and that nearly 200 politicians detained for various offenses have been released.

He praised the “extraordinary pace” of petition reviews and the commission’s tireless work, commending the Citizen Power branch, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Public Defender’s Office, private defense attorneys, and other stakeholders for their contributions.

He specified that most of the applications came from individuals who were under precautionary measures. He clarified that those seeking amnesty need only approach the court handling their case, or submit a request through their lawyer or a family member.

After emphasizing that amnesty is key to achieving social peace, breaking polarization, and fostering coexistence, he recalled that amnesty is requested before a judge, who evaluates whether the case adheres to the 13 acts of violence stipulated in Article 8 of the legislation and whether it corresponds to crimes not covered, such as intentional homicide, genocide, drug trafficking, or inciting military action against Venezuela. The judge assesses the case and decides whether to grant amnesty. If the decision is denied, it can be appealed.

He explained that the law contemplates the evaluation of other cases not initially included in the regulations, which results in a greater socio-political impact.

Acting President of Venezuela Thanks Victims of 2014 and 2017 Violence for Supporting Amnesty Law

He valued that although the law cannot resolve all cases, it becomes a first step towards understanding and tolerance between the different political sectors.

He recalled that each case is examined within 15 days of submitting the amnesty request. He considered that, thanks to the current pace of work, the deadline can be met in all cases.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

568
 
 

Venezuela and Cuba reaffirmed their fraternal relations and mutual solidarity during the 61st session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva, Switzerland. This was highlighted Monday by Foreign Minister Yván Gil, following a meeting with his Cuban counterpart, Bruno Rodríguez.

“On this occasion, we reaffirm our brotherhood and mutual solidarity as nations committed to the defense of their sovereignty, self-determination, and the truth of our peoples,” Gil stated, following the high-level meeting.

Meanwhile, the Cuban foreign minister highlighted that, during the exchange, the historical solidarity and cooperation between both countries was emphasized, as well as the willingness to continue deepening this brotherhood.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Yván Gil Pinto (@yvan.gilpinto)

So far this year, Cuba and Venezuela have faced escalating aggression by US imperialism.

The Bolivarian homeland was brutally attacked in the early hours of January 3 with a series of bombings on populated areas of Caracas, Miranda, La Guaira, and Aragua state. The invasion, carried out by US troops under orders from President Donald Trump, left more than 100 dead, including civilians and military personnel. During the armed attack, the constitutional president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Deputy Cilia Flores, were kidnapped.

Following the armed aggression against Venezuela, the US also intensified its attacks against the Cuban government and people, beginning with the illegal seizure of Venezuelan oil shipments destined for Cuba.

On January 29, President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing tariffs on any product from countries that directly or indirectly sell or otherwise supply oil to the Caribbean island in an unprecedented attempt to sow chaos and a humanitarian crisis on the island.

The measure, which is part of the historical policy of commercial, economic, and financial blockade of the US against Cuba, has been described as a deliberate attempt at economic strangulation.

Following the signing of the new US Executive Order against Cuba, Venezuela expressed its support for Cuba and rejected the US attempt to impose punitive measures on countries that decide to maintain legitimate trade relations with the Caribbean island.

“Free trade is a core principle of international economic relations between sovereign states, and cannot be subject to any type of coercion that impedes the free exchange of goods and services,” the Venezuelan government stated in a communique.

Delcy Rodríguez denounces attempts to derail peace and unity efforts
Simultaneously, Acting President Delcy Rodríguez stated Monday night that she will reveal the names of those who intend to continue disrupting “the path of tranquility.”

“I am seeing that there are sectors misinterpreting the Amnesty Law and the Coexistence process. They already have plans, and in due course, I will reveal them to the country so that everyone knows who, from a luxury hotel in the United States or Europe, intends to derail this process, intends to disrupt the path to tranquility and peace in Venezuela.” This warning was issued during a meeting with relatives of victims of political violence from 1999 to the present.

Rodríguez emphasized that it will be the Venezuelan people who judge, “let the Venezuelan people decide what we have to do” with those extremist sectors that seek to disrupt peace.

“Because enough is enough! That’s when I say: ‘No repetition’; that’s when I call for genuine and true justice, because enough is enough,” she said before dozens of victims of political violence caused by far-right sectors over the last 28 years.

Acting President of Venezuela Thanks Victims of 2014 and 2017 Violence for Supporting Amnesty Law

Earlier, Rodríguez stated at the event that she was aware “of some sectors that are not correctly interpreting what is happening in the country, they are measuring it from a political-partisan defeat,” when in reality “on January 3, Venezuela lost, all Venezuelan women and men lost. There was no winner in this country.”

In her speech, Rodríguez emphasized that the division among Venezuelans due to political polarization was the main factor responsible for the military aggression carried out by the US against Venezuela on January 3.

(Diario Vea) by Yonaski Moreno with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

569
 
 

Close to 3,000 people (mostly dressed in black, many with faces covered and sporting tattoos echoing fascist symbols) marched in Lyon on February 21 to honor Quentin Deranque, a member of a neo-Nazi group who died after suffering blows to the head in a clash with what are believed to be antifascist activists.

Media reports, including those by L’Humanité and Mediapart, describe an intense atmosphere where, despite organizers’ attempts to minimize outbursts in order to whitewash the event, racist insults were directed at passers-by and reporters not affiliated with right-wing outlets were obstructed in their work.

Chants against France Unbowed (La France Insoumise, LFI) were also noted, as the left party has been targeted by a smear and intimidation campaign in the aftermath of Deranque’s death. Over the past week, dozens of LFI representatives and candidates reported threats, while the party’s national headquarters was evacuated last week due to bomb threats. “I’m going to kill all the crooks, leftists, and other n*****s,” the threat sent to LFI read. “You’re going to pay a hundred times over for having killed Quentin. We’re going to do some nasty work in 2027 [presidential election year].”

The Lyon march was part of an attempt to shape Deranque into a martyr figure for the French far right and use his death to discredit antifascist groups, including those providing self-defense support in areas targeted by neo-Nazis, as well as the parliamentary left. Organizations leading the charge (including xenophobic women’s group Némésis) have been saluted by far-right parliamentary groups.

In the days following the events in Lyon, these groups have been revealed to have been in direct contact with neofascist collectives, that even last year were involved in planning provocations against local antifascist movements (despite trying to paint a non-violent picture of themselves in public). An investigation published by L’Humanité, for example, revealed that members of the Lyon chapter of Némésis had developed a strategy as early as October 2025 to offer their activists to serve as “bait” while neo-Nazi militants lurked around for antifascists near faculties and in other public spaces.

Yet the far right is not the only force on the political spectrum manipulating the situation to discredit the left. Conservatives and liberal politicians have long sought to label LFI an “extreme left” party whose program leads to violence. These defamations have intensified since mid-February, and many believe their aim is to undermine the party’s chances in the 2027 election.

French officials reject comments on the situation by Italy and the US
However, conservative and liberal forces found themselves opposite foreign politicians capitalizing on the same episode. When Italy’s far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni referenced Deranque’s death, writing that he had been “overwhelmed by a climate of [left-led] ideological hatred that spans several countries” and represented “a wound for the whole of Europe,” French President Emmanuel Macron criticized her statements, saying that Meloni should not interfere in other countries’ internal affairs. “I’m always struck by how people who are nationalists, who don’t want to be bothered in their own country, are always the first ones to comment on what’s happening in other countries,” he was quoted saying.

Two Hundred Years Ago, France Strangled the Haitian Revolution With an Inhumane Debt

Comments shared by the US Embassy in France claiming that “violent radical leftism is on the rise and its role in Quentin Deranque’s death demonstrates the threat it poses to public safety,” announcing the US would “continue monitoring the situation,” caused even stronger reactions. The French Foreign Ministry announced the US ambassador would be summoned, with minister Jean-Noël Barrot stating the government denounces attempts to manipulate the situation for “political aims” and requires “no lessons in dealing with violence,” “especially not by international reactionary forces.”

Despite Macron and Barrot’s apparent newfound courage towards other political figures, progressives insist that authorities failed to act preventively on the day Deranque participated in the clash, thus contributing to the fatal outcome – but also to stop the far-right demonstration from taking over Lyon, leaving the doors open for more threats to arise.

(People’s Dispatch) by Ana Vračar


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

570
 
 

By Craig Murray – Feb 23, 2026

There are two things which are extremely difficult to find in Venezuela – government repression and opposition support. I am pretty long in the tooth and very experienced in understanding politics and people around the world, and I have found it difficult to locate either.

I would particularly warn you against accepting the political prisoners narrative. There have been excesses, particularly after the unrest following the last disputed elections, but the large majority of those claimed to be political prisoners have been involved in actual, physical attempts to overthrow the government by force, or are involved in drugs related gangs. A combination of credulity, disinformation and the activity of NGOs supported by Western security agencies has presented you with an entirely false picture. I am sorry to say that generally decent organisations like HRW and Amnesty have been particularly credulous.

I absolutely do not support the claim that the opposition achieved two thirds of the vote at the last election. It is an absurdity. There were one million people at Maduro’s closing rally and 50,000 people at the opposition closing rally. Many of the alleged voting tallies the opposition published were obviously fake. There simply is no groundswell of anti-government opinion here, below or above ground.

President Nicolás Maduro is Not a Dictator

The bars in which I spend my evenings generally cater to the wealthier and are in the opposition heartlands of Altamira and Las Mercedes. People naturally assume a westerner is anti-Chavismo. The wealthy speak English so they are more or less the only people I can relax into conversation with. Talking to people in bars is my natural milieu. There is no domestic appetite for regime change and literally not one person has ever expressed enthusiasm for Machado.

(Craig Murray)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

571
 
 

US President Donald Trump denies reports that General Daniel Caine opposes war with Iran, says decision rests with him and prefers a deal.

US President Donald Trump denied reports about internal disagreements over a potential assault on Iran, affirming that only he makes such decisions.

Trump’s Truth Social statement centered on claims that General Daniel Caine opposes going to war with Iran, as well as “limited strikes” on the Islamic Republic. Trump claimed the reports were “100% incorrect,” insisting that the general has not publicly argued against military action.

In his remarks, Trump stressed that the decision to pursue military action lies exclusively with him. “I am the one that makes the decision,” he said, underscoring a centralized approach to US policy toward Iran.

While noting that General Caine would prefer to avoid war, Trump alleged that if military action were ordered, it would be “easily won,” boasting once again that military force remains an option despite ongoing diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions.

Simultaneously, Trump warned of consequences if a deal is not achieved, while claiming he prefers reaching an agreement.  “I would rather have a Deal,” he said.

( @realDonaldTrump – Truth Social Post )
( Donald J. Trump – Feb 23 2026, 4:11 PM ET )

Numerous stories from the Fake News Media have been circulating stating that General Daniel Caine, sometimes referred to as Razin, is against us going to War with Ira… pic.twitter.com/Z2wR6kHF8e

— Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial (@TruthTrumpPost) February 23, 2026

Initial report
Earlier today, Axios, citing informed sources, reported that US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine has warned Trump that a potential military strike on Iran could draw the United States into a prolonged conflict.

The report stated that Caine cautioned that such an operation could entangle Washington in an extended confrontation with Tehran, thereby increasing the risk of escalation across the region.

Trump Sets Deadline for Iran Deal

According to the sources cited by Axios, Caine also warned that military action against Iran could result in US casualties.

Despite raising concerns, the chairman reportedly told Trump that he would support and implement any decision ultimately taken by the president regarding a possible strike.

The reported warning comes amid ongoing debate within Washington over how to address tensions with Iran, as policymakers weigh diplomatic options against potential military action.

(Al Mayadeen – English)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

572
 
 

Venezuela marked the seventh anniversary of the Battle of the Bridges with a massive mobilization in Tachira state, commemorating the 2019 events against destabilization attempts.

This Monday, February 23, a motorized caravan and a massive mobilization in Venezuelan Tachira state commemorated the seventh anniversary of the Battle of the Bridges, an event defined as an episode of resistance against attempts at destabilization of the country.

During the event, Diosdado Cabello, Secretary General of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV, in Spanish), stated that the events of 2019 represent “a resounding demonstration of the popular-military-police fusion that characterizes Venezuela.”

From the border state, Cabello sent greetings to President Nicolas Maduro and First Combatant Cilia Flores, within the framework of remembering the events of 2019. In this sense, he emphasized that the sectors that attempted to impose conspiratorial plans were defeated thanks to the coordinated action of the Bolivarian Revolution.

“The fascists believed they were not only going to invade Venezuela, but also to consolidate what could have been the defeat of the Bolivarian Revolution. But no, the people, the popular-military-police fusion, worked perfectly, and they were defeated as they always have been”, he stated.

The Secretary General of the PSUV recalled that the confrontation unfolded in a context of intensive use of social media and other media outlets, under the pretext of bringing humanitarian aid.

“A lie, we know it was a lie; they came to invade Venezuela”, declared, adding that he has no doubt that “if people had entered Venezuela on February 23, history would be different.” He thanked the Venezuelan people for preventing their entry.

This seventh commemoration was held with the participation of Governor Freddy Bernal and Tachira’s authorities, in an event that sought to reinforce the message of civic-military unity.

Cabello emphasized that, in the current context, “the most important thing is not winning a battle, but winning the war”, highlighting the Venezuelan Government’s progress in consolidating the Bolivarian Revolution and maintaining the country’s sovereignty.

Cabello also mentioned that 52 days ago, the United States carried out a disproportionate attack on national territory occurred, resulting in the kidnapping of the President Nicolas Maduro and Cilia Flores and the deaths of more than 100 people. In this sense, he strongly criticized those who are calling for an invasion of their own country.

He also referred to the importance of maintaining coordination among popular, military, and police forces as a national defense strategy.

Rejecting Defeatism: Why Negotiation is Not Betrayal in the Face of US Imperialist Aggression Against Venezuela

During his speech, Cabello reiterated the ruling party’s commitment to the continuity of the political process initiated by Commander Hugo Chavez and currently led by President Nicolas Maduro, with a popular-military-police alliance was highlighted as a central element for protecting Venezuelan sovereignty against attempts at destabilization.

“Seven years later, we could quote the phrase of Commander Chavez, that we still have a homeland, thanks to February 23 of that year”, Cabello asserted, in a clear defense of national independence.

(teleSUR)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

573
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Electoral Reform: Votes are Won on the Ground

President Claudia Sheinbaum will present the Electoral Reform bill on February 25. The proposal maintains minority representation but eliminates the proportional representation list-based logic, as anyone who wants to represent the people must go out and earn votes in the field.

Youth Transforming Mexico

The Jóvenes Transformando México (Youth Transforming Mexico) program was presented, It is a comprehensive strategy for flexible education, culture, and sports.

Mexican Youth Institute (IMJUVE): Abraham Carro explained that neoliberalism criminalized youth, and this program opens real access to guarantee the right to happiness, peace, and a full life.

Ministry of Public Education (SEP): Tania Rodríguez announced the creation of 100 new Margarita Maza upper secondary educational schools, with a flexible model for youth resuming their studies.

National Physical Culture and Sports Commission (CONADE): Rommel Pacheco reported five national sports classes will be held this year: self-defense for women, baseball, boxing, mini basketball, and family racing.

Security: Miguel Torruco Garza, Deputy Minister for Crime Prevention, will support efforts with the construction of 100 community centers focused on preventing violence.

Culture: Claudia Curiel highlighted a circuit of over 200 music festivals and strengthened the Program to Support Artistic and Cultural Festivals (Profest), which doubled its investment to support young local artists.

The President emphasized that “although it’s hard to determine the number of youth linked to violence, this new program seeks to reach them.”

Security with Legality and Coordination: “Our Goal is Peace, Not War”

The Mexican government clarified that the operation in Jalisco this past Sunday that result in the death of the country’s leading drug kingpin did not aim to take anyone’s life; it repelled an aggression. Actions continue to restore normalcy in Jalisco and Michoacán after road blockades.

The government rejected claims that it was reviving former president Felipe Calderón’s war on drugs policy. The National Security Strategy remains in effect. The government previously acted outside the law; today it operates with legality and in adherence to the Constitution.

Backing the Armed Forces

Sheinbaum called Elon Musk’s statements linking the Mexican government and president to drug cartels absurd and noted legal action is being considered. She stressed that the people recognize and support the work of the Armed Forces and the security cabinet. The President rejected disinformation and opposition attacks concerning security operations.

Fair Trade, Sovereignty, and Foreign Policy

Sheinbaum reported that tariffs on non-USMCA products dropped from 25% to 10% following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. Though Donald Trump announced a possible rise to 15%, it hasn’t been officially published, so the current 10% level remains in effect.

In terms of foreign policy and energy, the President noted the end of sanctions on countries sending oil to Cuba and that Mexico may resume fuel shipments, to be announced later.


  • People’s Mañanera February 24

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera February 24

    February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on electoral reform, youth educational programs, Jalisco anti-drug operation and peace, the Armed Forces, and US tariff changes may open door to oil for Cuba.

  • Corporatism’s Dead, Long Live Corporatism

    Labor | News Briefs

    Corporatism’s Dead, Long Live Corporatism

    February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

    Mexico’s historic labour unions are trying to re-align themselves with the Fourth Transformation while the PRI continues sinking.

  • The Dispute Over Public Education

    Analysis

    The Dispute Over Public Education

    February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

    Currently, there is no voice with pedagogical authority to respond to the criticisms leveled at the textbooks and explain and justify the necessary modifications. An inexperienced and controversial official like Nadia López García will hardly be able to extinguish this fire.

The post People’s Mañanera February 24 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

574
 
 

This article by Blanca Juárez originally appeared in the February 23, 2026 edition of Sin Embargo.

Mexico City. The PRI has nothing to offer them. The PRI-affiliated labour unions, once an electoral machine, a pillar of the previous regime, and even a symbol of pro-government labour struggles, are now in limbo. Today, their leaders are announcing the end of corporatism and seeking a rapprochement with the 4T (Fourth Transformation).

In this legislature, the PRI lacked the votes—or the will—to reserve seats for the leaders of the three unions integrated into the party, as it had done previously. In 2024, a weakened PRI barely managed to secure 13 seats in the Senate and 37 in the Chamber of Deputies. None of these seats went to the leaders of the Regional Confederation of Mexican Workers (CROM), the Confederation of Mexican Workers (CTM), or the Revolutionary Confederation of Workers and Peasants (CROC). For the first time in decades, they were left without representation.

President Claudia Sheinbaum and Isaías González, leader of CROC. Photo: Daniel Augusto, Cuartoscuro.

The CTM will elect its new leader on Monday, February 23, and Tereso Medina Ramírez, the frontrunner, is already announcing an “institutional collaboration” agreement with all levels of government. But in particular—and he says this with a solemn tone, as if addressing his union members—he is speaking “with the Constitutional President of the United Mexican States, Dr. Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, because she encourages us to build a better Mexico.”

Tereso Medina has put himself forward to lead the CTM, one of the PRI’s labor unions. Photo: Cuartoscuro.

SinEmbargo also sought comment from CROC leaders Isaías González Cuevas and Rodolfo González Guzmán on this issue, but received no response. Medina Ramírez did agree to the interview, in which he triumphantly declared: “Corporatism has run its course.”

Despite the fact that the CTM stated in its statutes its adherence to the PRI and that it was an electoral reserve, Tereso Medina points out that whoever offers the workers’ vote to any party “is deceiving himself” because the country no longer works that way.

Corporatism in unions refers to their being part of the political power structure. Instead of focusing on expanding workers’ rights, they mitigate conflicts and suppress strikes. And even more importantly, they secure votes for the ruling party.

But if the PRI-affiliated unions can no longer provide all of this to the 4T, it’s not because their leaders wanted to change course. Rather, it was in spite of them. Morena doesn’t need union leaders as intermediaries “because it has the entire structure of the Secretariat of Welfare,” says labour lawyer Pablo Franco.

If the leadership used to coerce their base into voting for the PRI, today social programs that reach homes directly can influence that family and not just the affiliated worker, the specialist explains.

And on top of all that, the labor reforms resulting from the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) have further reduced their room for maneuver. And it is likely that “the Mexican government will sacrifice them” in the face of renewed pressure from the Trump administration regarding labour rights, he adds.

Readjustment in the Face of the Debacle

The relationship between PRI-affiliated union leaders and the PRI leadership is “increasingly weaker,” says Pablo Franco. On the contrary, “they have sought to align themselves with the 4T (Fourth Transformation),” says the former Secretary General of Collective Affairs for the Local Board of Conciliation and Arbitration of Mexico City.

But AMLO didn’t need “union leaders to win in 2018, much less to consolidate his government project. Because he built a model of direct communication with the people.”

However, “chapulineo” is not a recent phenomenon.

The gradual decline of the PRI was foreseen years ago in some of its unions. “When I was in the Labor Affairs Secretariat of the PRD National Committee, with Mr. López Obrador, many people from the PRI and the CTM approached us and asked how they could switch to the PRD,” says Pablo Franco.

Former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador in 2020 alongside Carlos Aceves del Olmo, at the Extraordinary National Congress of the CTM.

In what now seems like another life, the PRI had its union allies throughout the state apparatus. Even in the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), with Justice Juan Moisés Calleja García, recalls Pablo Franco. Calleja García was a member of the CTM, and served as an advisor to the teachers’ union, the electricians’ union, and others.

But the neoliberal model promoted by the PRI governments backfired on them and their unions, which had helped them maintain a false sense of labour peace. The major labor federations, once aligned with the government, became “allies of business,” notes Franco Hernández.

Social discontent was directed not only against the ruling party, but also against its operational arms. Protection contracts—that is, contracts signed by leaders and business owners behind the backs of the workers—diminished the support that the working class could have given to the PRI.

Adding to the problem is the fact that “the corporate model is based on blackmail and intimidation, telling them: ‘if you don’t vote for our candidates, you’re going to lose your job,’” notes Pablo Franco. This strategy ultimately undermined support for the PRI. So, while the leaders remained PRI members, the rank and file of PRI-affiliated unions stopped voting for the PRI.

During the PAN administrations, there was a slight resurgence in the leadership of PRI-affiliated unions, and this continued during the six-year term of PRI member Enrique Peña Nieto. However, even then, for example, the CTM, under the leadership of Joaquín Gamboa Pascoe, became increasingly less politically active, which reduced its membership, according to Pablo Franco.

The late Leonardo Rodríguez Alcaine, leader of the CTM, speaks with Vicente Fox, as President-elect, at a meeting of the Labor Congress. Photo: Juan Sotelo, Cuartoscuro.

Tereso Medina states that the CTM represents “almost 3 million workers.” This figure “tells us that the union, despite all the transformations it has undergone, remains, today, the strongest labour federation in Mexico,” he points out. A membership of this magnitude can have a certain electoral influence or the capacity for collective pressure in specific situations, which is why the CTM likes to boast about it.

However, proving and verifying that number is very difficult. The information collected by the Federal Center for Conciliation and Labour Registration does not ask unions about their affiliation with a labour federation, and their membership lists are outdated.

“I don’t think it’s such an exaggerated number, although I do believe it’s inflated. When the CTM says it has 750,000 members in Mexico City, I know it’s not true. As an authority, I was responsible for certifying the union membership lists from the last convention to elect representatives to the Conciliation Boards of Mexico City. And the CTM had around 120,000 members,” says Pablo Franco.

The USMCA, Another Blow to PRI Unions

The 2019 labor reform and the USMCA established rules for transparency and union democratization. According to Pablo Franco, a former federal deputy, “the main victims of this are the bureaucracies of the largest and most traditional unions, such as the CTM, the CROC, and others.”

It should be remembered that the CTM filed 400 injunction requests against the labour reform.

Tereso Medina himself has already lost control of one of the collective bargaining agreements under these new regulations. One of the unions he leads, the “Miguel Trujillo López,” was negotiating working conditions at the General Motors plant in Silao, Guanajuato. But the workers did not re-elect him to continue representing them. Instead, they created the National Independent Union of Automotive Industry Workers (SINTTIA).

Election process at General Motors in Silao, Guanajuato, to choose which union will negotiate its working conditions. Photo: Cuartoscuro.

Tereso Medina is poised to lead the CTM, with the support of 28 of the 32 state federations and seven of the 10 deputy general secretaries. According to other labour experts, the CTM has been absent from the review of the USMCA under the leadership of Carlos Aceves del Olmo, who recently announced he will not seek reelection.

Medina Ramírez proposes the creation of a pluralistic council to re-examine the trade agreement. “Let’s look after our share, the redistribution of jobs in each country with social and labour justice,” he says.

The former PRI congressman and senator insists that, if elected as leader of the CTM, he will promote cooperation with President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo. “On the issue of security, for example, we have to develop strategies with the President, work as a team, and stay vigilant, because we want the fight against insecurity in the country to continue, because our workers are among them.”

The “real and unwavering defense of national sovereignty” is another issue where he says the federal government must be supported. “That is why I call on everyone, regardless of political affiliation, to set aside sectoral, partisan, group, or personal interests and prioritize the nation’s higher interests, because building a better Mexico is in everyone’s best interest.”

Blanca Juárez is a journalist who covers political, labour, social and cultural issues from a feminist perspective.

  • People’s Mañanera February 24

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera February 24

    February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on electoral reform, youth educational programs, Jalisco anti-drug operation and peace, the Armed Forces, and US tariff changes may open door to oil for Cuba.

  • Corporatism’s Dead, Long Live Corporatism

    Labor | News Briefs

    Corporatism’s Dead, Long Live Corporatism

    February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

    Mexico’s historic labour unions are trying to re-align themselves with the Fourth Transformation while the PRI continues sinking.

  • The Dispute Over Public Education

    Analysis

    The Dispute Over Public Education

    February 24, 2026February 24, 2026

    Currently, there is no voice with pedagogical authority to respond to the criticisms leveled at the textbooks and explain and justify the necessary modifications. An inexperienced and controversial official like Nadia López García will hardly be able to extinguish this fire.

The post Corporatism’s Dead, Long Live Corporatism appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

575
 
 

The Foreign Ministry of Venezuela and the Simón Bolívar Institute received international solidarity delegations visiting the country amid US threats. At the event, held on Saturday, February 21, the activists reaffirmed their solidarity with Venezuela and their support for President Nicolás Maduro and National Assembly Deputy Cilia Flores, currently held hostage by the US. The activists visited various communes and saw the progress made by the organized people.

Eliezer Marchán, spokesperson for the El Arañero Commune of Sabaneta, explained to the visitors how the people administer the resources for production. He emphasized that today, territorial self-government is the backbone of political stability in the country. 

Popular consultation of March 8: democracy without bureaucracyThe event focused on the upcoming National Popular Consultation, scheduled for March 8. This method of direct democracy allows resources to reach the territory without intermediaries, ensuring that communes can direct and execute their own projects. 

“The communes are campaigning for the March 8 elections. These will define the projects to be executed across the 5,336 communal territories of the country,” Marchán explained. 

Venezuela’s Communes: Socialism of the 21st Century

According to the international solidarity activists, the Venezuelan model stands out as an efficient administration that guarantees peace and progress through popular participation.

(Últimas Noticias) by Olys Guárate

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SC


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›