Latin American Publications!

123 readers
27 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
426
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Acting President Delcy Rodríguez announced Tuesday that Venezuela has received the first US $300 million of a total of US $500 million from oil sales. She explained that these funds will be used to finance workers’ salaries and protect their purchasing power from what she described as the “fluctuations of the foreign exchange rate.”

During a meeting with commune leaders in the La Vega parish of Caracas, Rodríguez noted that these resources will be distributed to public and private national banks through the Central Bank of Venezuela.

“Let us continue advancing in communal democracy,” said Rodríguez, emphasizing that organized popular power is what governs the destiny of Venezuela. “The [US] $300 million received will cover the income of our workers, protecting their purchasing power from inflation and the negative impact of the exchange rate.”

Venezuelan authorities have not yet provided precise information about the nature of the new oil relationship with the US regime following its criminal military attack against the country and abduction of President Nicolás Maduro. However, analysts claim that the easing of illegal US sanctions might be among upcoming decisions to allow for new pragmatic changes carried out under duress, amid impending military threats and direct assassination threats against Delcy Rodríguez and Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, among other Chavista leaders.

Analysts claim that this extraordinary income comes from trade operations conducted between Venezuela and the US involving the sale of crude oil accumulated as result of the illegal US naval blockade. These assets are reportedly entering the country via newly created sovereign funds in Qatar, which were announced by the acting president last week.

Exchange rate stabilization and economic outlook
Economists claim the drastic shift in Venezuela’s exchange rate environment stems from expectations of improved access to foreign currency. Since last December, the gap between the official and black market exchange rates had reached nearly 300%. The official rate averaged approximately 300 bolívars per USD, while the black market rate peaked at 900 bolívars per USD immediately following the US attacks.

As of January 20, the official exchange rate stands at 344.5 bolívars per USD, while the black market rate has dropped to 450 bolívars per USD—representing a 50% decline in the parallel market rate.

Rodríguez also touched on the social recovery of the nation: “We are pleased that our children are back in school. Let us continue strengthening popular democracy and following Venezuela’s destiny together with the people.”

Venezuela’s GDP Grows Almost 9% in Third Quarter (+Exchange Rate)

Delcy Rodríguez is serving as acting president following the US attack and abduction of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, by US special forces on January 3. The presidential couple was taken to New York, where they remain illegally detained in a maximum security prison.

According to the latest figures released by Venezuelan authorities, the military aggression perpetrated in Caracas and the states of Aragua, Miranda, and La Guaira resulted in more than 100 deaths, including both civilians and military personnel, and left more than 150 people injured.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

427
 
 

Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez continues to make changes to her cabinet. On Monday, she announced the appointment of Nuramy Josefa Gutiérrez González as the new minister of health and the appointment of Calixto Ortega Sánchez as president of the International Center for Productive Investment (CIIP).

Nuramy Gutiérrez is a Venezuelan professional with a long career in the healthcare sector. From now on, she will be committed to strengthening healthcare and protection policies for the benefit of the Venezuelan people, Rodríguez wrote on social media. The president expressed her gratitude to Magaly Gutiérrez for her work in the health sector, confirming that she will continue to lead the Venezuelan Institute of Social Security (IVSS).

Informo al país que he designado a la doctora Nuramy Josefa Gutiérrez González, como nueva ministra del Poder Popular para la Salud. Esta profesional venezolana ha dedicado su vida a este sector, profundizará las políticas de atención y protección sanitaria dirigidas al pueblo. pic.twitter.com/pR26Oio0wN

— Delcy Rodríguez (@delcyrodriguezv) January 20, 2026

Rodríguez noted that the appointment of Calixto Ortega as president of the CIIP will allow the continued growth of national and international investments for the Venezuelan production system in this stage of economic recovery.

“We offer our full support for the well-being and prosperity of Venezuela,” said the acting president while thanking Alex Saab for his commitment and great work at the head of the institution.

Ortega’s was among the first cabinet changes announced by Delcy Rodriguez on January 6, when he was appointed as new sectoral vice president of economy and finance, replacing Rodriguez. She noted that Ortega will have the responsibility of strategically coordinating the ministries and institutions that make up the country’s economy.

Rodríguez emphasized that these new appointments are key to continuing to promote the country’s welfare and economic development policies.

Hernán Canorea, new president of VTV
Furthermore, the acting president appointed journalist Hernán Canorea as the new president of Venezolana de Televisión (VTV), replacing Freddy Ñáñez, who had been in charge of the state channel since November 2017.

This appointment was made through Decree No. 5,216, published in Official Gazette No. 6,969, which came into effect last Friday, Jan. 16, when she announced the appointment of Miguel Perez Pirela as new head of the Information and Communication Ministry.

Canorea has had a long career in journalism within the Venezuelan system of public media. He began his career at Radio Nacional de Venezuela and later moved to television at VTV.

| Position | New Official | Replaces | |


|


|


| | Minister of Health | Nuramy Gutiérrez | Magaly Gutiérrez | | President of CIIP | Calixto Ortega Sánchez | Alex Saab | | President of VTV | Hernán Canorea | Freddy Ñáñez | | President of Patria Foundation | Anabel Pereira Fernández | (New Appointment) |

New president of Fundación Patria
Another move by the Chavista leader was the appointment of Anabel Pereira Fernández as acting president of the Patria Foundation and president of its board of directors. Pereira has also served as minister for economy and finance since August 2024.

Venezuela’s Acting President Delcy Rodríguez Announces New Cabinet Changes

Pereira is a lawyer and economist by profession and has extensive experience in Venezuelan public administration within the financial and regulatory sector.

With this appointment, the executive seeks to strengthen the operational capacity of this institution which, in recent years, has become a key element in the country’s stability. The Patria Foundation is attached to the vice presidency of the Republic. and its structure is defined in its founding.

(Últimas Noticias) by Karla Patiño with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

428
 
 

This article by Eduardo Nava Hernández originally appeared at Rebelión on January 10, 2026. The views expressed in this article are the authors’* own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project.*

The proclamation by the US president of a revived Monroe Doctrine (or, to satisfy his egomania, the Donroe Doctrine) was perversely put into action with the assault on Fort Tiuna in Caracas, the bombing of various Venezuelan military and civilian installations, the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, and the murder of the Venezuelan and Cuban guards protecting them. From then on, the discourse emanating from Washington purports to herald an era of imperial domination through the unlimited use of force and, as Stephen Miller—advisor to Donald Trump and one of those tasked, along with Marco Rubio and Secretary of State Pete Hegseth, with “managing” the Venezuelan transition—has stated, a world in which international law and the sovereignty of states have no relevance.

The unrestricted use of force is the first premise of the new order envisioned by Trump. More than a rehash of the Monroe Doctrine, it is a revival of Theodore Roosevelt’s Big Stick doctrine, representing the United States’ purported “right” to intervene militarily in other countries to preserve its strategic interests. The second premise would be the division of the world into spheres of influence, virtually spheres of dominance, assigned to the great powers, where the entire so-called “Western Hemisphere”—that is, the Americas—would be a living space— Lebensraum in the Nazi German version—for expansion to ensure Americans receive the resources they need, to the exclusion of other powers.

A new order that, for those other emerging powers, China and Russia, is unacceptable and leads to increased tensions across the globe; but it is a fact that its design is already impacting the nations of the Americas and poses a threat to the entire continent. It is clear that the governments of Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Paraguay, Bolivia, El Salvador, Guyana, and the soon-to-be-inducted government of Chile are already operating under this logic of subordination to imperialism, while Venezuela has become a politically unstable territory in resistance, and direct threats loom over Cuba, Colombia, and, as has been predicted, Mexico.

To exert pressure, Washington’s argument hinges on drug trafficking, just as it was the activity and ideology of communism in our countries and terrorism in the past. Organized crime gangs are now being labeled narco-terrorists; and in Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico, this is being used as leverage to force a shift in their governments, compelling them to submit to Washington, gaining access to their oil and mineral resources, and excluding other countries from these resources. In the case of Mexico, Trump is also trying to force it to suspend fuel supplies to Cuba, thus further strangling its economy; but he continues to threaten to attack Mexican cartels directly on our soil.

There is no doubt that these forms of pressure will continue and intensify. Donald Trump and his team have demonstrated time and again that they will not hesitate to use any means to bring all the governments of the Latin American region, and other parts of the world, under their control. This is nothing less than a return to the crudest and most aggressive forms of imperialism, historically known, but which we were supposed to never see again in this century. And for Mexico, this implies, from now on, a period of great complexity in bilateral and geopolitical relations in general. Added to this is the pressure from the country’s business and right-wing opposition, which, in complete agreement with Washington, demands that Venezuela be left to its fate and that solidarity with Cuba be abandoned in accordance with the will of the aggressor empire. All of this is happening as the trade and financial agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States, USMCA, enters its review phase.

A long-term vision for Mexico implies strengthening diplomatic, commercial, and political ties with diverse regions of the world, to bolster autonomy and break the logic of exclusive confinement that Trumpism seeks to impose on the countries of the region.

The attacks have been multifaceted and brutal, especially during the last year: tariffs on Mexican exports; the mass and violent expulsion of migrant workers to the United States; forcing Mexico to become a repository for migrants from other countries in the Americas and other regions of the world; threats to carry out operations on our territory (“something has to be done about Mexico”) against drug manufacturing and trafficking organizations, especially fentanyl; the integration of the Mexican armed forces into the strategy of the U.S. Northern Command through joint exercise programs; and pressure to impose tariffs on Chinese exports to our country. The stance of the Morena governments since Donald Trump’s first term has been to pragmatically comply with the despot’s demands, ever since Andrés Manuel López Obrador agreed to close the southern and northern borders to the Central American caravans, detain them in concentration camps (with tragedies like the one in Ciudad Juárez), and receive deportees from other countries. President Claudia Sheinbaum, among other things, has handed over about fifty Mexican prisoners without extradition trials for crimes committed in Mexico to be imprisoned in US prisons.

The aggressiveness of Trump’s policies should compel us to re-examine the logic that has led, in recent times, to the trade-off of principles for immediate interests.

The current situation compels the Sheinbaum administration to adopt a smart and firm policy. The document issued on January 4th jointly with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Spain, and Uruguay, and the positions presented at the UN Security Council by Mexican representative Héctor Vasconcelos and at the OAS by Alejandro Encinas, have been positive developments that reaffirm the principles of Mexico’s established foreign policy. The suspension of the Senate committee meeting, which was to discuss the approval of allowing U.S. military personnel to enter Mexican territory for training exercises with the Mexican Navy, was also a positive sign.

The principles of non-intervention, self-determination of states, and peaceful settlement of disputes are, of course, the indispensable foundation for the development of an autonomous policy in the international arena. They imply discarding the pragmatism that has dominated Mexican diplomacy in recent decades, based merely on strengthening economic ties with our northern neighbor through trade agreements, and on security and counter-narcotics issues, which has in fact subordinated Mexico more than ever before to the demands of the United States. In other words, the aggressiveness of Trump’s policies should compel us to re-examine the logic that has led, in recent times, to the trade-off of principles for immediate interests.

Mexico must urgently disassociate itself from any form of military alliance with the interventionist power and withdraw its armed forces from joint operations, under penalty of appearing to collaborate in the violation of nations’ right to self-determination, in this case, that of Venezuela. It cannot accept, as it has thus far, that China is a nation hostile to our national interests; it is not. On the contrary, a long-term vision implies strengthening diplomatic, commercial, and political ties with diverse regions of the world, which is the way to bolster autonomy and break the logic of exclusive confinement that Trumpism seeks to impose on the countries of the region.

We need a more active diplomacy in international forums, however corrupted and weakened they may be, because these are the arenas where we can make our proclaimed principles of foreign policy heard and where we can forge multilateral alliances to isolate Trump’s neo-fascism, by putting forward proposals grounded in international law, which must be revived as a bulwark against US political and territorial expansionism. Trump has opened many fronts of aggression simultaneously, so multilateral responses are necessary. And, above all, trade agreements must not dictate international policy, lest we relinquish sovereignty in foreign policy.

Mexico must overcome the inertia of decades of unilateral alignment with the interests of the United States and understand that the nation’s future depends, more than ever in the current circumstances, on its ability to circumvent the encirclement that the empire seeks to impose on us, along with the other countries of the region. A rapprochement with Brazil, the other subregional power, is key at this moment to counteract the influences emanating from the north that are poisoning the atmosphere of international coexistence. This also applies to Canada, a country also threatened by regional convergence in North America and by the trade and financial agreement we share with the United States. Our country’s silence regarding the massacre in Gaza has been repugnant and ominous; it must not continue in the case of aggressions against our closest neighbors in the region.

Although it may not seem so, the Mexican government’s weakness lies primarily within its own borders. The polarizing rhetoric of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, continued by Claudia Sheinbaum, which confronts and verbally discredits the opposition and capital—even though the government actually serves the latter, confronting and attacking the middle class, as well—and the construction of its hegemony solely on the basis of clientelism through social programs and propaganda, while simultaneously weakening popular organization, is insufficient to confront a right wing that, while diminished, is more than willing to join imperialist initiatives and rely on them to vie for power. However high the popularity of the rulers may be, electoral clientelism—as we have seen recently even in Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Honduras, where progressivism had a more solid foundation—proves fragile in the face of the combined onslaught of the empire and its internal lackey groups.

The Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela has not collapsed, and it will surely survive, because its social base is much stronger, stemming from communes and popular social organizations, than what we see in Mexico. Building this network of organizations that will give life to an effective popular alternative is the task of the left, not the current regime.

The post Mexico in the Context of the New Imperialism appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

429
 
 

By Joe Emersberger – Jan 19, 2026

He has shown that US tyranny causes millions of deaths, but supports it anyway

Despite having always been a strong opponent of the kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, the Venezuelan economist Francisco Rodríguez has harshly criticized illegal U.S. sanctions on his country. He has a very impressive academic and professional background as an economist. He has frequently used his expertise to refute fascists like Ricardo Hausmann (a supporter of Nazi Israel’s genocide in Gaza) who deny the lethal impact of US sanctions on Venezuela.

Grim calculations showing a partial toll of US savagery
More recently, Rodríguez was the lead author of a paper that was published in the prestigious Lancet Global Health journal. [1] The paper showed that illegal economic sanctions (mostly imposed by the US but often joined by its EU vassals) have killed about 560,000 people per yearfrom 2012 – 2021. The paper noted that “This estimate is higher than the average annual number of battle-related casualties during this period (106 000 deaths per year) and similar to some estimates of the total death toll of wars including civilian casualties (around half a million deaths per year).” One reason the death toll is so high is because roughly 25% of the world population (about 2 billion people) live under US sanctions.

It should be stressed that the data Rodriguez used in this paper came largely from the UN. The UN, even before the US-sponsored genocide in Gaza, exposed itself as being quite capable of publishing dubious statistics that serve the US imperial agenda. So that bias may have made his estimate lower than it would otherwise have been. In spite of that, Rodriguez’s estimate was horrific. And for the 1970 – 2021 period, his research shows the death toll from illegal US-led sanctions to be 38 million.

The obvious conclusion to draw from Rodriguez’s research is that the US is a very murderous dictatorship. With total impunity, the US wields lethal authority over billions of people who are not US citizens, or even residents. Empire is another word for that kind of dictatorship.

No. Trump cannot win an election in Venezuela “democratically”
But in a New York Times op-ed on January 8, Rodriguez has shown himself to be completely oblivious to the implications of his own research. He wrote the following:

If Venezuela were a democracy, then Ms. Machado’s party would be in power. But Venezuela is not a democracy, nor will it become one overnight simply because Mr. Maduro is no longer around. When the Trump administration made the decision to carry out a surgical operation to extract Mr. Maduro instead of occupying the country, it also chose, at least in the short term, to work with a state structure designed and run by supporters of Mr. Maduro and his predecessor Hugo Chávez.

This passage is sickening for a few reasons. He refers to the attack that killed about a hundred people as a “surgical strike”. In fact, nowhere in the op-ed does he say a word about the deaths caused by the kidnapping of Maduro. But most offensive of all is Rodriguez’s claim that “if Venezuela were a democracy, then Ms. Machado’s party would be in power.”

Maria Corina Machado’s party should be outlawed in Venezuela, and Machado herself should have been jailed decades ago. Machado signed the Carmona Decree in 2002 when Hugo Chavez was overthrown for two days. The decree, issued by the short-lived US-backed dictatorship of Pedro Carmona, voided the 1999 constitution that voters had ratified and dissolved all the country’s democratic institutions including the National Assembly and the Supreme Court. In 2005, Machado told the New York Times that she was only at the National Palace the day the decree was issued to visit Pedro Carmona’s wife who was “a family friend”. She told the Christian Science Monitor she thought the Carmona Decree was a sign in sheet. These are risible claims. It was disgraceful of Rodriguez to tell New York Times readers that Machado’s support for the 2002 coup could be doubted. And recall that the New York Times enthusiastically welcomed Carmona’s brief dictatorship.

Maria Corina Machado with George W Bush in 2005. Both supported a coup that ousted Hugo Chavez in 2002.

She has always made clear that she wants to slavishly serve the US dictatorship in Venezuela and violently exterminate the Chavista movement she despises. As Rodriguez concedes in his New York Times op-ed, she has called for foreign invasion (mass slaughter) in Venezuela, and applauded Trump’s recent homicide spree targeting Venezuelans on the high seas, and never condemned Trump illegally sending hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to prison in El Salvador as if they were slaves. Unmentioned by Rodriguez was that Machado is also a staunch supporter of the US-sponsored genocide in Gaza.

Rodriguez claimed in the op-ed that Machado has the support of 70% of Venezuelans. That’s outlandish, but also irrelevant to whether she could ever win a democratic election. Anyone who accepts the legitimacy of a US-backed candidate winning in Venezuela should not complain if Trump were to use starvation sanctions and military force to ensure that his allies prevail in elections within the United States. The main thing preventing that in the US (for now) is that Democrats and Republicans are two factions of the same party: both totally committed to serving oligarchs and ensuring that “Israel” can perpetrate genocide. All factions of the US oligarchy have profited from the “two party” scam and will not easily give it up.[3]

Moreover, even if Machado’s fascist views were shared by the Venezuelan majority, they would still be illegitimate. Democracy does not mean the majority is allowed to perpetrate mass murder. That’s what Machado would do if the US were to fully commit to installing her into power. Trump obviously balked at the US troop casualties and long term expense of installing Machado and carrying out her homicidal fantasies. Rodriguez completely glossed over Machado’s fascistic nature and described her as overly stubborn – almost as if she were too virtuous to get Trump’s support.

No grounds for accepting that Machado’s party won in 2024
Despite admitting in his op-ed that Machado is an extravagant liar who has said that Maduro’s government helped steal the US election in 2020 from Trump, Rodriguez has an unshakable faith in Machado’s tally sheets from the 2024 presidential election (which she claims were won by her proxy, Edmundo Gonzalez). Gonzalez refused to present evidence to the electoral chamber of the Supreme Court. Venezuela’s Electoral Council has not published a breakdown of the vote by polling station. It has been alleged that this can only be because the government is hiding evidence of fraud since it has almost always done this in the past.

That argument ignores the lesson of the US-backed coup in Bolivia in 2019. The Morales government in Bolivia gave OAS and EU monitors full access to results in real time of the presidential election. The OAS and EU concocted brazen lies about the results that incited a military coup. These lies were fully backed by the western media and prominent human rights groups like Human Rights Watch. As usual, nobody suffered appropriate consequences for what was done to Bolivia. The OAS General Secretary at the time, Luis Almagro, who aggressively promoted the lies, did not even lose his job over it.

And of course, Francisco Rodriguez – like the rest of the western establishment – has been calling Venezuela a dictatorship years before 2024. Rodriguez did not accept the legitimacy of Maduro’s victory in 2018. Rodriguez had been a key advisor to the very distant second place finisher in that election, Henri Falcon. Rodriguez also accepted the legitimacy of the Trump-appointed Juan Guaido as interim president of Venezuela in 2019. More recently, Rodriguez happily endorsed Leopoldo Martinez who ran for Congress in the US as a Democrat. Rodriguez said Martinez “stood up to authoritarianism, faced political persecution, and kept fighting for democracy.” In fact, Leopoldo Martinez accepted a job with the Carmona Dictatorship as its Finance Minister.

Wider implications of living under US dictatorship
Venezuela’s government, even after being bombed by the US, has to tread very carefully and try to use diplomacy to survive. Trump wagers that Venezuela’s diplomacy will eventually devolve into surrender. After kidnapping Maduro, his war on Venezuela remains unpopular in the US. A majority (51%) oppose invading Venezuela and only 36% support it. A plurality (46%) doesn’t even approve of the kidnapping of Maduro. That’s remarkable given the constant vilification of Maduro across the political spectrum – and how supposedly low US casualties were as a result of the kidnapping. But the US “anti-war movement” such as it is, poses a miniscule threat. It is not nearly disruptive enough – party due to its own errors, but mainly because it operates under the constraints of dictatorial rule.

Venezuela cannot kidnap Trump in retaliation or bomb Washington DC. We should all wish it could. A lack of a credible military deterrent has always forced Venezuela to go ridiculously easy on US-backed subversives like Machado and Juan Guaido, who was never even arrested as he wandered all over Venezuela for years as the US-appointed interim president.

To be free of US tyranny, every country needs to have a credible military deterrent of its own – or one shared through reliable military alliances. Without that, “democracy” will mean either capitulation to the US or suffering of brutal consequences for daring to defy it – while the tyrants in Washington suffer no consequences at all.

NOTES
[1] His criticism of sanctions was so strong that he was willing to write a positive blurb about a bookJustin Podur and I wrote about Venezuela even though we took a strongly pro-Maduro perspective. Also, capitalism can be blamed for hundreds of millions of deaths since 1990 through a comparison with Cuba as I showed in another Substack article.

[2] Rodriguez’s co-authors were Silvio Rendon and Mark Weisbrot, the co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) where Rodriguez is a senior research fellow.

[3] Albeit in the post genocide in Gaza world things look possible that were once seemed unthinkable.

(Substack)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

430
 
 

Editorial note: Orinoco Tribune does not generally publish pieces older than two weeks. However, an exception is being made in this case as the current article remains as relevant today as when it was first published.

By Friends of Socialist China – Jan 5, 2026

China Daily published a hard-hitting editorial on January 4, branding US actions against Venezuela an invasion and an act of imperialist aggression.

It began by noting that: “The international community is deeply shocked by the United States’ blatant use of force against Venezuela, including large-scale air strikes on the country and the forcible seizure of its president and his wife. Its actions should be condemned as they constitute a naked act of armed aggression against a sovereign state and flagrantly violate international law…

“By any definition, the US military operation amounts to an invasion. It dangerously escalates the so-called ‘Monroe Doctrine’ from a 19th-century, isolationist-era concept into a 21st-century doctrine of force and coercion. This sets an alarming precedent for Latin America and the Caribbean, posing a direct threat to the sovereignty and security of countries across the region.”

Dealing with various pretexts advanced by the US, it points out: “Washington’s justification of it being a ‘counter narcotics’ action is neither credible nor legitimate. No such pretext can justify the bombing of a sovereign country or the abduction of its head of state. If such reasoning were to be accepted, it would effectively grant powerful nations a license to intervene militarily wherever they see fit, under a pretext given by themselves, hollowing out international law and replacing it with the law of the jungle.”

And referring to Trump’s statements that the US would “run” Venezuela to “get the oil flowing”, it responds: “These remarks tore away the already thin veil of moral pretence, exposing the operation for what it was: a resource-grabbing power play. Any veneer of pursuing justice or stability was blasted away in a blatant demonstration of lawless hypocrisy. The pattern is disturbingly reminiscent of the Iraq War — another chapter in Washington’s long record of seizing other countries’ resources under false pretences.”

While Washington speaks of “strategic retrenchment”: “For other countries in the Americas, this is not retrenchment but imperialist expansion — an aggressive reassertion of arrogant conceit. Venezuela is unlikely to be the last victim if this logic is allowed to prevail. The military action also aims to intimidate regional countries and deter them from deepening cooperation with other partners in the fields that the US is trying to dominate.”

“From fabricated charges to military strikes and regime change, the operation follows a familiar and deeply troubling script — one that reflects the logic of state piracy. Sovereign governments are first delegitimised, then destroyed by force, after which foreign capital moves in to carve up natural resources. This behaviour drags the world back toward a barbaric colonial era of plunder, in open defiance of international law… No wonder even some in the US political circle said they never again wanted to hear US leaders preach about a so-called ‘rules-based’ international order.”

It concludes: “What the world is witnessing is not a ‘rules-based’ order, but colonial pillaging. Upholding sovereignty, equality and non-interference is not optional. It is the foundation of global stability — and it must be defended.”

The following is the full text of the editorial.

The international community is deeply shocked by the United States’ blatant use of force against Venezuela, including large-scale air strikes on the country and the forcible seizure of its president and his wife. Its actions should be condemned as they constitute a naked act of armed aggression against a sovereign state and flagrantly violate international law and the basic norms governing international relations, as well as the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

By any definition, the US military operation amounts to an invasion. It dangerously escalates the so-called “Monroe Doctrine” from a 19th-century, isolationist-era concept into a 21st-century doctrine of force and coercion. This sets an alarming precedent for Latin America and the Caribbean, posing a direct threat to the sovereignty and security of countries across the region and shaking the foundations of the international order established after World War II.

Washington’s justification of it being a “counter narcotics” action is neither credible nor legitimate. No such pretext can justify the bombing of a sovereign country or the abduction of its head of state. If such reasoning were to be accepted, it would effectively grant powerful nations a license to intervene militarily wherever they see fit, under a pretext given by themselves, hollowing out international law and replacing it with the law of the jungle.

The true motivation behind the US’ aggression was laid bare by the US administration, which triumphantly announced that Nicolas Maduro and his wife had been “captured and flown out of the country” and that the US would “run” Venezuela on a “temporary basis” to “get the oil flowing”. These remarks tore away the already thin veil of moral pretense, exposing the operation for what it was: a resource-grabbing power play. Any veneer of pursuing justice or stability was blasted away in a blatant demonstration of lawless hypocrisy. The pattern is disturbingly reminiscent of the Iraq War — another chapter in Washington’s long record of seizing other countries’ resources under false pretenses.

President Nicolás Maduro is Not a Dictator

Washington’s claim of “strategic retrenchment” thus rings hollow. For other countries in the Americas, this is not retrenchment but imperialist expansion — an aggressive reassertion of arrogant conceit. Venezuela is unlikely to be the last victim if this logic is allowed to prevail. The military action also aims to intimidate regional countries and deter them from deepening cooperation with other partners in the fields that the US is trying to dominate.

The news conference held by US officials shortly after the operation only underscored this intent. The brazen boasting about “Operation Absolute Resolve”, including lurid details of how US special forces seized the Venezuelan president from his bedroom, was designed to instill fear rather than convey transparency. It revealed the extent to which the US is prepared to turn its military superiority into an instrument for imposing its will on others.

From fabricated charges to military strikes and regime change, the operation follows a familiar and deeply troubling script — one that reflects the logic of state piracy. Sovereign governments are first delegitimized, then destroyed by force, after which foreign capital moves in to carve up natural resources. This behavior drags the world back toward a barbaric colonial era of plunder, in open defiance of international law.

Such egregious conduct has not gone unchallenged even within the US. Some observers bluntly stated that the US has become a bully of the world. No wonder even some in the US political circle said they never again wanted to hear US leaders preach about a so-called “rules-based” international order.

International reaction has been equally blunt. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed grave concern over Washington’s disregard for international law. Russia said it was “extremely alarmed” by the act of armed aggression. The European Union called for respect for international law and the UN Charter “in all circumstances”. These voices reflect a shared global anxiety that when might replaces law, no nation is safe.

History has repeatedly shown that while wars may be easy to start, they are far harder to end. Although Washington boasts of the supposed efficiency and low cost of its operation, the true price will be paid over time by the entire region — and ultimately by the US itself. Power politics may yield short-term gains, but they cannot bring lasting peace or stability.

China has urged the US to ensure the personal safety of Maduro and his wife, immediately release them, cease attempts to subvert the Venezuelan government, and resolve differences through dialogue and negotiation. What the world is witnessing is not a “rules-based” order, but colonial pillaging. Upholding sovereignty, equality and noninterference is not optional. It is the foundation of global stability — and it must be defended.

(Friends of Socialist China)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

431
 
 

In Africa, there is usually little news coverage about Latin America, but the US military intervention in Venezuela on January 3 made the front pages of newspapers and led radio and television newscasts. Most African countries have expressed clear condemnation of the military attack carried out by the US under President Donald Trump. South Africa, a BRICS member and one of the continent’s leading countries, was among the first to do so, and ranks among the most critical, following months of various tensions with the Trump administration.

In its official public statement issued that same day, January 3, South Africa said that the removal of President Nicolás Maduro constitutes a “manifest” violation of the United Nations Charter and that it is imperative to oppose this act by the US because failing to do so would normalize a scenario in which the principle that no nation is superior to another exists only on paper, while in practice, military power dictates the rules. The government of Cyril Ramaphosa called for the urgent convening of the UN Security Council.

Since Donald Trump took office in January 2025, relations with South Africa have been strained. The occupant of the White House claims that a “white genocide” is underway in the country, without any evidence of such. But the issues are not merely rhetorical. While pursuing a hardline immigration policy, Trump has promoted the reception of white Afrikaner migrants as refugees. Likewise, he did not attend the G20 summit held in Johannesburg last November and has imposed restrictions on South African diplomats regarding arrangements for the next meeting, which is scheduled to take place in the United States in 2026.

The South African government’s position is not uniform. This stance has generated new problems within the Government of National Unity between the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the African National Congress (ANC), the majority party in the coalition, which has clear anti-imperialist roots and holds the Ministry (Department) of International Relations and Cooperation. According to the DA, the ministry’s call for an urgent meeting of the UN Security Council “smacks of hypocrisy and contradiction,” and they reproached their allies for not having taken the same position during the Russia–Ukraine conflict in 2022 (at that time, South Africa abstained from voting on a resolution condemning Russia).

The rest of AfricaAt the continental level, on January 3 itself—the day of the armed action against Venezuela—the organization that brings together the continent’s 54 countries, the African Union (AU), expressed its “deep concern” over the events in the South American and Caribbean country, including the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro, while reaffirming its commitment to the fundamental principles of international law. At the regional level, one day later, the organization that includes most West African countries, ECOWAS, condemned the US action in line with the AU’s statement but without mentioning the Venezuelan president.

Although Venezuela’s foreign policy toward Africa began in the 1960s, it gained significant momentum under the government of Hugo Chávez. The Bolivarian leader coined the idea of “Mother Africa” starting in 2002, which translated into a significant increase in diplomatic, commercial, and cultural relations with African nations. During Chávez’s presidency, diplomatic relations were established with every country on the continent, 17 diplomatic missions were opened, and a vice ministry for Africa was created. As part of this outreach, Chávez became the first president of a non-African country to speak at the AU’s annual meeting in 2006 and promoted the creation of the Africa–South America (ASA) summits, whose second edition in 2009 was held on Venezuela’s Margarita Island.

Notably, this January, the UN Security Council is chaired by an African country: Somalia. It is worth recalling that recently, Somaliland—the northern region of the country that proclaimed independence from Somalia in 1991 and until recently had no official recognition—was recognized by Israel on January 6 and visited by Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, a move that Somalia condemned as a serious violation of international law.

South Africa took the lead in condemning US actions in Venezuela, in what can be seen as a new chapter in relations between the two countries. Other nations were slower to respond. For example, on January 8, the countries that make up the Alliance of Sahel States (Burkina Faso, Niger, and Mali), with a clear anti-imperialist stance, issued an official statement condemning the “act of aggression by the United States.” They criticized the “illegal kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife” and reaffirmed their commitment to a world order based on respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter. It is striking that oil-producing countries such as Angola, Algeria, or Nigeria have not yet issued official statements.

In Nigeria, on Christmas Day, US air forces carried out strikes in Sokoto State, in the country’s northeast (Nigeria being the most powerful member of ECOWAS), against Islamic State targets. According to the US Secretary of Defense, the attacks were coordinated with the Nigerian government following Donald Trump’s allegations of killings of Christians in the country.

The geopolitical gameAfrican countries’ solidarity with Venezuela stems from their historical experience with the consequences of colonialism and imperialism.

In these calls for dialogue and for maintaining a multilateral order that respects the sovereignty of peoples, one can discern a fear that the era of rule by the strongest may once again become the politics of the present and the future.

At the same time, there is caution in realpolitik, as important issues are under discussion with the United States, such as visa and migration matters and the renewal (or not) of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which has allowed African products to enter the US market with low or no tariffs. It is within this delicate balance that Africa’s highly diverse continent continues to navigate.

South Africa: CP Reiterates Solidarity with the People of Venezuela Amidst Intensified Aggression by the United States

(Misión Verdad)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

432
 
 

Various journalistic and media organizations in Bolivia criticized the decision by the National Telecommunications Company (Entel) to remove, as of January 17, Telesur (channel 206) and Russia Today (channel 204) from its Fiber Optic Television, Satellite Television, and Entel TV Smart application services. The associations warned that the measure affects the public’s right to access a diverse range of information.

In a joint statement, the Association of Correspondents of the International Press (ACPI) and the National Association of Journalists of Bolivia (ANPB) questioned the decision by the state-owned company, which was justified on alleged “administrative issues” that, they noted, have not been clearly or thoroughly explained.

For both organizations, this lack of information “violates the audiences’ right to receive a serious and transparent explanation consistent with the responsibility of a state-owned enterprise.”

The journalistic entities stated that the insufficient justification offered both in Entel’s official statement and through its customer service channels gives rise to well-founded suspicions that this is an unacceptable act of censorship and a violation of freedom of expression.

They added that this concern is reinforced by precedents in Bolivia, as well as by recent experiences in other countries in the region, where similar decisions adopted after political changes led to restrictions on media pluralism and the weakening of democratic debate.

In this context, the organizations stressed that respect for diversity of voices and tolerance of differing—even opposing—positions are fundamental pillars of any democratic system, principles that are also recognized and protected by the country’s Constitution.

They further warned that the arbitrary silencing of media outlets and journalists can trigger a spiral of serious consequences for freedom of expression, normalizing censorship practices that later become difficult or even impossible to reverse.

“This situation harms society as a whole and exposes media outlets and journalists to the risk that, in the future, even more restrictive decisions may be adopted against those who do not align with official narratives,” the statement said.

For this reason, they urged the Bolivian government to fully guarantee the exercise of freedom of expression and respect for informational pluralism, without distinction as to the type of actor involved, as well as the population’s right to obtain information through the media of its choice.

The Association of Alternative Media of Bolivia (AMAB) joined the criticism, recalling that under previous administrations—even those with ideological orientations different from the current one—international channels such as CNN broadcast their signal in the country without restrictions or censorship.

AMAB stated that the exclusion of Telesur and RT “constitutes a direct attack on the fundamental right of Bolivians to be informed freely, pluralistically, and diversely” and that it violates essential principles enshrined both in the Constitution and in international human rights treaties.

The organization maintained that in a state that proclaims itself democratic, access to multiple sources of information should not be considered a privilege but a right. In that sense, it emphasized that press freedom is a pillar of democratic coexistence and protects not only journalists and media outlets but, above all, the public, which has the ability to decide what content to consume and which voices to hear in order to form its own judgment about national and international issues.

Finally, AMAB warned that Entel’s decision cannot be understood as a mere technical or commercial adjustment but rather as “a political measure that deliberately restricts the population’s access” to perspectives different from those promoted by the current state administration.

ALBA Suspends New Right-Wing Government of Bolivia

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

433
 
 

Moscow reiterated its condemnation of the US military’s attack on Venezuela, once again describing it as “illegal.”

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov reported that Russia maintains constant communication with Venezuela’s acting president, Delcy Rodríguez.

“We are in continuous contact with the acting president via diplomatic channels,” he told journalists.

Peskov noted that although President Vladimir Putin does not currently have an immediate phone call scheduled, one would be arranged “without delay” if necessary to strengthen bilateral coordination.

Likewise, the Kremlin urged the international community to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Venezuela in the face of external pressure. These statements coincide with remarks by Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who highlighted the “long history of good and strategic relations” between the two nations.

Finally, Lavrov reaffirmed that both Moscow and Caracas remain “faithful to the agreements signed,” thereby consolidating their political and economic alliance.

Russia Reaffirms Unwavering Support for Venezuela Amid US Imperialist Aggression

(Últimas Noticias)  

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/CB/SL


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

434
 
 

This article by Gabriela Serralde originally appeared in the January 19, 2026 edition of El Sol de Morelia.

Editor’s note: Normalistas is a term for students who attend Mexico’s rural teachers training colleges. The header photograph is of Normalistas marching in Mexico City on October 2nd, 2025 in Mexico City.

Demanding the allocation of teaching positions, this [Monday] morning graduates from the Normal School of Arteaga and the School of Educators blocked Siervo de la Nación Avenue in the city of Morelia, while a union faction of the National Coordinator of Education Workers (CNTE) unexpectedly took over the State Education Secretariat.

The activities began shortly after ten in the morning in the area; first the students blocked the road near the educational institution and later extended to the Infonavit offices located next to the Paseo de la República bypass where they remain indefinitely.

One of the graduates, who preferred to remain anonymous, commented that since January 15th, the educational authorities should have carried out a transparent and public process for assigning positions, since currently more than 300 of her classmates from the 2024 generation still do not have a code, but so far they have not received an answer.

“We are waiting for the second event for the allocation of permanent positions, as the SEE and the Uesicamm had agreed to give us spaces based on retirements by this time,” the Michoacán teachers college graduate said.

According to the young student teacher, on January 15th the authorities should have notified them of the number of available spaces and the number of vacancies, in order to follow up on the list of young women who have already been evaluated. To date, 314 graduates are waiting for the process to continue.

“Since we took the exam, 314 of us have been evaluated at the preschool level, but only 48 people have been assigned, and we have until May for them to assign them,” said the Normalista graduate.

This is because the process of assigning places began in April 2025; however, the process takes a year for the assignment, although if the graduates do not receive a response before May, they would have to repeat the entire procedure to get a place, and that, she noted, is what they do not want.

Likewise, the student teacher commented that fewer and fewer vacancies are opening for this level, although she stated that they are aware of places or kindergartens where they are single-teacher schools, meaning that they are being attended by one or two teachers, but later they close the groups because they cannot provide coverage.

The CNTE takes over the State Education Secretariat / Photo: Gabriela Serralde / El Sol de Morelia.

Union Takes Over Secretariat of Education

That same morning, a union faction from the National Coordinator of Education Workers (CNTE) took over the offices of the State Education Secretariat to demand various concessions. As of now, the doors of this department are closed, with no set time for the resumption of work.

Their demands include the immediate hiring of teachers from the 2019 to 2025 graduating classes, an immediate attention desk, reinstatement of dismissed colleagues , payment of withheld salaries, recategorizations and relocations, regularization of level orders and coverage of teacher shortages.

The post Normalista Students Block Morelia Avenues While CNTE Teachers Occupy Education Secretariat appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

435
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Universal Healthcare Credential: A Collective Dream

The Universal Healthcare Credential was presented. It will guarantee healthcare regardless of the individual’s insurance plan affiliation, consolidate medical information in both physical and digital formats. It will be launched in March.

President Sheinbaum explained that it will enable a single medical record to be compiled and strengthen the public healthcare system, emphasizing that it is “a dream not only held by the President, but by all Mexicans.”

Democracy Against Fraud & Authoritarianism

Sheinbaum recalled that the former ruling party sustained itself through authoritarianism and repression, and that democratic advances were achieved thanks to popular mobilization. The President mentioned the attempt to strip López Obrador of his immunity and past electoral fraud.

She noted that “all those who committed electoral fraud, who became the PRIAN, were part of the neoliberal model that impoverished the people and took away rights; those who endorsed the fraud now present themselves as champions of democracy and call us authoritarian.”

Measles: Prevention & Vaccination in Mexico

The Mexican government reported that, given that Canada and the U.S. are no longer measle-free, more than 11.85 million vaccines have been administered, with targeted efforts in Jalisco, Chiapas, Michoacán, and Guerrero to protect the population and contain outbreaks.

IMSS-Bienestar: Transformation of the Healthcare System

Sheinbaum explained that the Seguro Popular government healthcare insurance program was a failed model that left 90 hospitals non-operational. Today the public system is stronger and fully functional. The Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) will have six new hospitals in Campeche, Sonora, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, and Yucatán, and IMSS-Bienestar will open the Women’s Oncology Hospital in Mexico City in February.

Enrollment in IMSS-Bienestar is voluntary; only Nuevo León, Coahuila, Durango, Jalisco, Querétaro, Aguascalientes, Chihuahua, and Guanajuato have not joined the program, and enrolling the population through healthcare credentials will depend on the decision of each state.


The post People’s Mañanera January 20 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

436
 
 

Simon, who serves as head of state, arrived yesterday at Felipe Angeles International Airport in central Mexico with her husband, Whit Fraser, and was received by Foreign Secretary Juan Ramon de la Fuente.

A statement from the Ministry states that “the visit aims to strengthen bilateral ties”, following the one made by Prime Minister Mark Carney last September, as well as “dialogue on priority policies in favor of indigenous peoples in both nations”.

Since 2021, Simon is Canada’s first indigenous governor general, with an active agenda in the areas of social reconciliation (especially with indigenous peoples), mental health, wellfare, diversity, inclusion, nature and environment.

The northern country has a form of government of constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy, and is part of the Commonwealth of Nations, where King Charles III is the monarch and the governor general, his representative both on Canadian territory and abroad.

The Ministry detailed that the Governor-General is responsible for taking protest to the prime minister and his cabinet, installing and dissolving Parliament and acting as commander-in-chief of the nation’s Armed Forces of North America.

As a result of the meeting held in this capital city in September, Carney and Sheinbaum elevated the framework for cooperation between the two countries to an integral strategic partnership.

abo/lam/las

The post President of Mexico receives Governor-General of Canada first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

437
 
 

By María Páez Victor  –  Jan 15, 2026

President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, lawyer and congresswoman Cilia Flores, were violently kidnapped in a bloody coup that massacred all 40 of his presidential guards, and were flown to New York under bogus accusations of drug peddling. One hundred people were killed by the massive attack on an unsuspecting Venezuela, a nation that did not even receive a declaration of war from the US. The attack and kidnapping were a blatant violation of the UN Charter, the Geneva Convention, human rights protections, and the precept of the immunity of heads of state.

A nuclear-power nation disproportionately committed an act of war against a peaceful, unsuspecting nation without even a declaration of war as a warning. This attack killed 100 people and destroyed dwellings and public buildings such as medical depots, a library, schools, and even a university campus. The US used a powerful cyber weapon, previously unknown, that paralyzed all communication systems, the internet, and electricity. In an unparalleled act of imperial terrorism, US troops kidnapped an active head of state—and his wife.

While reporting such a deadly trashing of international law and common decency, the mainstream lackey press continues to put the adjectives “dictator” or “authoritarian” before President Maduro’s name, further stating that he “stole” the presidential election of 2024. It is as if that justified this state thuggery that has imperiled world peace. All of a sudden, jumping on the news bandwagon, many are writing articles as if they knew all about Venezuela, when before they had scarcely paid any attention to what was happening in that country. Let me be perfectly clear: Nicolás Maduro was duly, legitimately, and democratically elected president of all Venezuelans on July 28, 2024, with 51.2% of the vote, despite a carefully designed US conspiracy to delegitimize the Venezuelan electoral process.

The conspiracy against Venezuela has involved a widespread, ubiquitous campaign to portray its constitutional president as a dictator. Mainstream media just cannot stop placing adjectives such as “the dictator Maduro” or “the strongman Maduro” when reporting even the most innocuous items of news about the country. Even progressive analysts fall into this canard, and it will be front and center of the circus trial that President Maduro will have to stand. Therefore, it is imperative that the world know the solid evidence that shows Nicolás Maduro won the presidential elections of 2024 in a transparent and verified manner.

The 2024 presidential elections were witnessed by hundreds of international, independent witnesses in an atmosphere of order and calm, with all the constitutional, electoral, and procedural laws of Venezuela being followed. But the US mobilized its web of mendacious media, political allies, and an army of influencers and paid journalists on social media to cry foul even before the voting.

Yes, there was attempted fraud at the 2024 presidential elections, but not by Chavismo; it was by María Corina Machado and her lackeys, with full technical, economic, and political support of the CIA. There was a comprehensive, even impressive, sabotage campaign to discredit not just Maduro, but most importantly, the electoral system of Venezuela—perhaps the most advanced in the world—that has been so admired for its transparency and efficiency, and was lauded as such by Jimmy Carter (Alan McLeod, Orinoco Tribune, July 30, 2024).

Before the vote, there were constant terrorist attacks on the country’s electrical installations, food depots, and public facilities. Psychological warfare abounded, trying to instill all sorts of fears into the population, along with campaigns of lies and hatred against Chavistas and their families. Social media helped a great deal with this campaign of hatred and violence. The atmosphere was appalling.

World public opinion was manufactured by placing the idea that the opposition was sure to win by a great majority, so if Maduro was declared the winner, it would be due to fraud. This was a message repeated by media, social media, and right-wing pundits everywhere. It was hardly touched upon that María Corina Machado set up a completely unknown person, Edmundo González, as her stand-in because the highest courts of the land (not Maduro) had barred her from public office for plain, old-fashioned corruption. “The coup plot involved a massive and sustained, months-long, world corporate media campaign spewing an unusually homogenous message that president Maduro would be electorally defeated, quoting ‘polls’ that gave US-supported, extreme right-wing candidate, Edmundo Gonzalez (fielded by the Unitary Platform coalition, PUD), 80% of the vote” (Francisco Dominguez).

But the main weapon of misinformation was an enormous cyberattack on the highly computerized voting system, which paralyzed the process and delayed what had been for years a seamless transmission of vote data from polling stations to the central electoral authority, the CNE. This delay was used by the opposition as evidence of fraud. Venezuela obtained help with this situation from a company, Columbus, that verified the problems were due to a massive cyberattack that involved an astonishing 30 million attacks per minute for 20 hours on the system. The cyberattack also affected banks, government offices, digital payments, and public services. In total, 106 institutions were hacked as they tried to paralyze the state and create chaos. It is to the great credit of the Venezuelan electoral teams, faced with this unprecedented challenge, that chaos did not occur and the results were able to be released without too long a wait.
The other lethal weapon Machado and the CIA trotted out, which was highly effective, was a fake webpage that gave false “official” results to confuse the situation and was used by right-wing groups to insist there was fraud.

Nicolás Maduro, in view of all the confusion and lies, requested that the count be verified not just by the CNE but also by the Supreme Court of Venezuela. Is this what a dictator would do? The Court asked the opposition parties to present their evidence of fraud, but Machado’s party refused to attend. They had no evidence and simply continued their campaign of lies and rumors, which was eagerly picked up by a gullible media.

Perhaps the most salient evidence of President Maduro’s lack of dictatorial tendencies is how he has governed. He has decentralized power, or to be precise, devolved power to people’s organizations of communal councils and communes. These constitute an entire branch of power run by the active participation of citizens who are able to indicate their collective needs in local and district areas. In the hardest economic moments due to the illegal US sanctions, it has been the rural communal councils that have fed Venezuelans, and in the diversification of the economy, the communal councils and communes have stepped up all kinds of production. President Maduro has been the leader in bringing forward “the communal state,” the most important vehicle for public participation that defines the participatory democracy that the Venezuelan Constitution proclaims. Is this what a dictator would do—give status and power to people’s organizations?

Nicolás Maduro was born in a working-class district of Caracas and drove a bus for a living. He was a union man, went on to be a congressman, and was the minister of foreign affairs for Hugo Chávez. As a person, he is intelligent, kind, and respectful of all those around him, as well as a lover of music and dancing. He is a family man and a very Christian and spiritual person.

Cilia Flores, his wife, was born in a small town and went to Caracas, accompanied by her mother, to study law. With determination, she became Hugo Chávez’s lawyer when he was imprisoned and got him out. She is now an eminent lawyer, a member of Congress, and a foremost leader of women’s rights in the country. When the US goons came to drag her husband away, she fought and refused to budge, insisting that if they took him, they must take her too, because she would not be separated from her husband. Such is their mutual love for each other. Not for nothing, she prefers the title of “the First Combatant” over that of “First Lady.”

As a president, Nicolás Maduro was signaled by Hugo Chávez as the one to lead the country after his death, and Chávez urged the people to elect him. It has been Maduro’s onerous task to guide Venezuela through the most critical times in its modern history due to the criminal, illegal US sanctions that nearly brought the economy down.

As he was being marched off to jail as if he were a common criminal, he managed to send a message to his people with sign language saying: We will be victorious. This simple hand sign filled Venezuelans with hope and courage.

Acting President Delcy Rodríguez, a lifelong revolutionary and daughter of a journalist beaten to death by the CIA goons that ran the secret police during previous US-supported governments, is a highly educated lawyer with degrees from the University of London and the Sorbonne. She is a skilled negotiator and no pushover, determined to protect Venezuela’s sovereignty, get the constitutional president and first lady back, and at the same time, prevent another vile military attack. The latest poll (Hinterlaces) shows that eight out of every 10 Venezuelans approve of Rodríguez. And those who thought that Machado’s opposition had the majority in the country can now see the lie for what it is, as this supposed majority is nowhere to be seen celebrating the ouster of President Maduro. Instead, the Venezuelan streets and plazas have been inundated with thousands of people demanding the return of their president. Also in the Global South, multitudes of people have been out on the streets demanding his return.

President Maduro can, even from the ignominy of a New York jail cell as a prisoner of war, hold his head high because he has kept the faith with his beloved people, his mentor Chávez, his conscience, and his God. Throughout the Global South, Nicolás Maduro has become the symbol of resistance to US imperial crimes—just like Nelson Mandela.

MPV/OT


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

438
 
 

This is stated in the guild’s monthly report, which focuses on analyzing the treaty that was signed in the Uruguayan capital on January 17.

The UEU commends the importance of the European bloc for South American exports and investment.

The report cites official estimates of an increase in exports of close to 4 per cent and a 0.5 per cent increase in employment when the agreement is implemented.

Exporters expect a boost to trade in goods and services and investment on both sides.

Also an improvement in the competitiveness and security of supply chains; also improvements in the competitiveness and diversification of energy sources and raw materials.

In other areas, the report heralds the implementation of important changes in the fight against climate change, including deforestation, in favor of sustainable development.

abo/mem/ool

The post Uruguayan exporters conclude Mercosur-EU agreement first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

439
 
 

Mahmoud Al-Asṭal, a lieutenant colonel and head of the General Investigations Department at the Interior Ministry in Khan Younis, was assassinated on Sunday by an armed cell of occupation collaborators operating in Gaza.

According to sources, gunmen traveling in a civilian vehicle opened fire on Al-Asṭal in Al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis, killing him on the spot. Hours later, Hossam Al-Asṭal, identified as the leader of the cell, appeared in a video claiming responsibility for the killing and threatening further attacks.

Hossam Al-Asṭal, widely known by the nickname Abu Safan, is a former detainee of Gaza’s Interior Ministry who had been imprisoned on charges of collaboration with the Israeli occupation and involvement in the assassination of Palestinian scientist Fadi Al-Batsh in Malaysia. His family later issued a statement disowning him, saying he escaped from prison during the early days of the Israeli war on Gaza and stressing that he had “a long criminal and security record linked to collaboration [with the occupation] before the war and did not represent the family in word or deed.”

Witnesses told Al-Akhbar that as the collaborators attempted to flee after carrying out the assassination, resistance fighters moved to arrest them. The attempt was thwarted by direct Israeli military cover, with warplanes firing several missiles to secure the group’s escape. The strikes killed three resistance fighters and wounded others, indicating that the operation was conducted not only under the direction of the Israeli General Security Service but in full coordination with the Israeli army.

The murder adds to a series of similar security operations carried out by collaborator cells in the past weeks. The most recent was the assassination of Ahmad Zamzam, an officer in the Internal Security Service, in Al-Maghazi refugee camp in central Gaza. Other planned attacks in Jabalia camp and northern Gaza were foiled. Hamas security forces later arrested one of the collaborators involved in Zamzam’s killing, seizing a camera that was broadcasting the operation live to an Israeli intelligence officer.

These assassinations come amid severe security conditions, with resistance security personnel operating under constant pressure and pursuit while attempting to maintain a minimum level of order and stability. They also coincide with an ongoing restructuring of the Interior Ministry aimed at adapting administrative structures to wartime conditions.

The resistance security platform Al-Hares said the assassination was intended to spread chaos, as part of a systematic plan to undermine security and target police personnel. The counter-collaboration unit Radea, meanwhile, vowed swift retribution against the collaborator cells.

The direct involvement of groups publicly known by their leaders’ names in assassinations has widened the scope of confrontation and extended it beyond security agencies into families and the broader social environment. Several families have already vowed retaliation against Hossam Al-Asṭal. Investigations indicate that these armed cells exploit the fragile security situation created by the war and the Israeli presence in Gaza to carry out these operations. However, resistance intelligence assessments conclude that the groups lack the independent capacity to carry out complex assassinations and function primarily as operational tools within a tightly coordinated Israeli intelligence framework that provides intelligence, field maps, and aerial cover during withdrawals.

For the Israeli side, such attacks are viewed as low-cost operations that involve limited human casualties in case of failure and minimal political consequences in case of success.

(Al-Akhbar)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

440
 
 

The Secretary of Public Education, Mario Delgado Carrillo, reported that Mexico is registering historic progress in literacy, reflected in a 7.4-fold increase in the number of people educated into literacy annually during the period 2020 (the year of the pandemic) and 2025, as a result of the National Literacy Strategy for Shared Well-being.

He reported that, according to official estimates, the number of literate people [educated annually] increased from 22,527 in 2020 to 189,874 in 2025, demonstrating the impact of a comprehensive strategy that prioritizes those who, due to various circumstances, had been left out of the traditional education system.

Delgado said that for the governments of the Fourth Transformation, literacy is considered a national priority and a strategic action of the Mexican State to reduce inequalities, strengthen social inclusion and expand development opportunities throughout the country.

Through the Ministry of Public Education (SEP), the National Institute for Adult Education (INEA) implemented the National Literacy Strategy for Shared Well-being, aimed at expanding educational coverage through a community-based, territorial approach and with full respect for the social, cultural and linguistic diversity of Mexico.

Mario gets a hug.

The head of INEA, Armando Contreras Castillo, highlighted that since the beginning of President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo’s administration, literacy has been consolidated as a national movement, coordinated with the 26 State Institutes of Adult Education and the six Operational Units throughout the country.

He emphasized that this effort was strengthened through the formation of 50 strategic alliances with state governments, federal agencies and public institutions, aimed at identifying needs, focusing actions and strengthening educational support within and outside the national territory.

He also reported that collaborations were promoted with municipal governments, the private sector, social sector organizations and volunteers, as well as work programs with organizations in the United States to strengthen the operation of Community Plazas Abroad.

With these advances, the SEP reaffirms its commitment to continue strengthening literacy as a permanent public policy, aimed at guaranteeing rights, reducing educational gaps and consolidating well-being, social inclusion and the educational transformation of the country.

The post 7.4 Times Increase in Adult Literacy Program Graduates appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

441
 
 

The official Palestinian news agency (Wafa) reported Tuesday that numerous military forces cordoned off the area, after which bulldozers entered the building and began demolition work.

According to the source, soldiers hoisted the Israeli flag inside the headquarters of the UN institution.

Through his profile on the social network X, the general commissioner of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, pointed out that this is an unprecedented attack and a deliberate violation of international law.

Like all UN member states and countries committed to rule-based order, Israel is obliged to protect and respect the inviolability of the agency’s facilities, he recalled.

He also pointed out that the event follows the approval by Tel Aviv of other measures against UNRWA, including the closure of a health centre and the announcement of a cut in the water and electricity supply to its facilities.

These actions, together with previous attacks and a large-scale disinformation campaign, contradict the October ruling of the International Court of Justice which reaffirmed that Israel is obliged under international law to facilitate the agency’s operations, not to hinder or prevent them. The court also stressed that Tel Aviv has no jurisdiction over East Jerusalem, he said.

There can be no exceptions. This should be a wake-up call. What happens today to UNRWA will happen tomorrow to any other international organization or diplomatic mission, whether in the Occupied Palestinian Territory or anywhere else in the world, he added.

abo/mem/gas

The post UN denounces attack on Palestinian Refugees Agency first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

442
 
 

The Cuban Foreign Minister said on the official social network x that we apreciated the Party, the government and the people of China for sending a first batch of a donation of 30,000 tons of cereal officially received yesterday.

The aid intended to complete the basic basket of Cubans “is a sign of the close brotherhood and historical ties of friendship and solidarity that unite both nations,” said Rodriguez on the social network.

During Monday’s reception, Cuban Vice Prime Minister Oscar Perez-Oliva said that two deliveries of 2,400 tons from the Mariel container terminal and the port of Santiago de Cuba are already on Cuban soil.

He also reported that two more shipments will arrive at the Island in the first half of this year, which will meet the total amount donated by the people and the Chinese authorities.

China’s ambassador to Cuba, Hua Xin, also attended the delivery where he recalled that it “not only embodies the deep bonds of special friendship between both nations, but also demonstrates the unwavering commitment to remain united even in difficult times”.

abo/mem/jqo

The post Cuban government riaffirms gratitude to China for rice donation first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

443
 
 

This article by Alexia Villaseñor originally appeared in the January 19, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

The marketing of basic grains continues to be one of the main problems facing agricultural producers, despite negotiations held in recent months with the federal government, producers from Bajío and Zacatecas pointed out, who expressed their concern about the need to resort to loans and leave properties as collateral in order to be able to plant and harvest the next agricultural cycle.

Corn producers in the Bajío region – Jalisco, Michoacán and Guanajuato – indicated that they have at least one and a half million tons of the grain that they cannot sell, because the warehouses and collection centers are saturated and the companies have not presented purchase offers.

Pavel Guerrero, a producer from Jalisco, emphasized that they have had to resort to the livestock sector; however, he explained that “they don’t buy domestic corn so easily, since they can import as much as they want at a low price.”

He explained that some farmers have made deals with livestock producers, although at prices lower than those paid by the flour and tortilla industry, which is 5,200 pesos per ton. “It has been sold for as little as 5,050 pesos per ton. What the producers want is to sell the grain; they are desperate,” he stated.

Regarding the government support of 950 pesos per ton sold in this region, he pointed out that, although the operating rules do not include marketing to the livestock sector, they are confident that they will not have difficulties receiving the incentives.

Meanwhile, Fernando Galván, a bean producer in Zacatecas, called for the warehouses to be emptied, since in this situation producers are forced to resort to middlemen, who buy the grain from them at eight pesos per kilo and not at 27.

He reported that 400,000 tons of this legume were harvested in this state, but the government will only purchase 80,000 tons. “The rest will be left at the mercy of middlemen. So, almost 80 percent of the producers are being left without the opportunity to sell their food,” he warned.

New Protests

Guerrero announced that grain producers from various states are forming new groups to seek solutions to the marketing problem, including Jalisco, Guanajuato, Michoacán, Zacatecas, Aguascalientes, Querétaro, Hidalgo, Tlaxcala and the State of Mexico.

“We’ve already spoken with the government and with industry leaders; we’ve looked for ways to recover some of our investment, and there’s still no response to this urgent problem,” Becerra lamented. For this reason, they did not rule out further protests and road blockades to demand short-term solutions.

The post Mexican Grains Crisis Persists: Farmers Threaten More Protests appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

444
 
 

This article by Antonio Heras originally appeared in the January 19, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

San Quintín, Baja California. Most ranches in the San Quintín region hire day laborers on a piece-rate basis, under the “going out and paying” scheme, without benefits or social security, according to Venustiano Hernández, one of the leaders of the region’s labor movement, during which employees protested in 2015 about the terrible working conditions in southern Baja California.

That is now a serious problem in San Quintín, because the ranchers – not the agribusiness companies, which are monitored – are the ones who employ day laborers in this way and do not take responsibility for any aspect, said Fermín Salazar, one of the five spokespeople of the Alliance of Organizations for Social Justice, which emerged from that movement.

Day laborers arrive at the ranches in the early morning and begin harvesting agricultural products on a piece-rate basis until they finish their work, without benefits or social security, in a completely illegal scheme.

The relationship is with the person who takes them to the fields, who at the end of the day receives the money to pay them and gets a percentage from each worker, as well as the charge for the transportation service.

“Those who work on a piece-rate basis, with greater skill and strength, are the ones who earn a little more,” they say.

For Venustiano Hernández, who has traveled throughout the agricultural fields of the area in the last decade, “this situation is our fault for accepting illegal payments from employers, who take advantage of the need of the day laborer, and the government, which does not ensure compliance with the Labor Law or is complicit, because it even warns the ranches when they will be conducting inspections.”

He reiterated that in those ranches there are no contracts between workers and employers; furthermore, there are companies that sign agreements for only three months, without protection for the employee.

A decade after the conflict of farmworkers, who stopped agricultural production and blocked the transpeninsular highway, the leaders participate in the podcast Ten Years Later: Farmworkers Between Agreements and Reality, to reflect on what this movement left behind, based on an idea by the education teacher Lenin Escobar, president of the Finance and Municipal Heritage Commission of the San Quintín City Council.

The broadcast offers a collective reflection from those who led the farmworkers’ movement on March 17, 2015, to demand wage improvements in the fields of the San Quintín Valley, social security, an end to sexual harassment of employees and harassment of workers by foremen and supervisors.

It also presents the perspective of the different leaders who participated in the fight for rights in San Quintín, so that new generations can learn why the social movement erupted, what the government omitted, and the responsibilities incurred by the companies.

Transpeninsular Highway Strikes & Blockades

It has been the most important in the region, as ranches were shut down from Colonet to Vicente Guerrero, and the Transpeninsular Highway, which connects Baja California with Baja California Sur, was blocked.

Fermín Salazar, a teacher of Mixtec origin, was one of the five spokespeople for the farmworkers during the protests and participated in meetings with representatives of the Mexican and Baja California governments. This was during the presidency of Enrique Peña Nieto (PRI) and the governorship of Francisco Vega de Lamadrid (PAN).

Movement Brought Together More Than 70,000 Workers

The movement brought together more than 70,000 farmworkers from San Quintín to demand fair wages and decent working hours.

Back then, workers were paid 70 or 80 pesos a day, with shifts of eight to twelve hours, in deplorable health and working conditions. “Today we see things differently as a result of the historical movement, because there were many workers who earned 80 pesos a day, while in other companies they earned from 90 to 115 pesos; there were different wages,” Fermín commented.

“I come from the fields and I was part of this movement that represented the largest strike of farmworkers in the history of San Quintín, nobody had done one from Colonet to the bridge of Rancho de Los Pinos,” he added.

He recounted that the mobilization began due to low wages, but other demands were included. “I had in my hands a file of 132 complaints from female workers regarding harassment and workplace and sexual harassment,” recalled Fermín, who pointed out that the foremen and supervisors were the ones being accused. He explained that “that rate dropped, and we hear few complaints now.”

He noted that the protest “began with the defense of labor rights: Christmas bonus, holidays, overtime, training, weekends off, and affiliation with the Mexican Social Security Institute, since very little money was being earned. The transportation of farmworkers has improved; they are no longer transported in flatbed trucks but in buses.”

“The employers themselves realized it and we talked to them to adjust to the laws,” he said.

“The Alliance of Organizations for Social Justice is still alive, but not with the same strength or ability to mobilize, since we split into two parts and although we managed to register the Independent Democratic Union of Agricultural Day Laborers, we made a mistake with the appointment of the first general secretary (Lorenzo Rodríguez), because he stopped fighting for workers’ rights,” Salazar concluded.

The post San Quintín: Exploitation of Agricultural Day Labourers Persists appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

445
 
 

During a press briefing held at the al-Omar oilfield, the largest, located in the Deir Ezzor Governorate, Qablawi explained that the development of the fields will be carried out using national technical expertise, in cooperation with local and international companies.

The SPC executive underscored the strategic importance of the al-Omar oilfield and revealed that efforts are underway to reach an agreement with Shell, the field’s previous operator, to transfer full ownership to the Syrian State.

He explained that al-Omar produced, before the conflict, around 50,000 barrels per day, a figure that currently does not exceed 5,000 barrels due to the primitive and environmentally unsound methods used in the last few years.

Qablawi noted that the company has developed a rehabilitation plan in accordance with international standards to increase production between 40,000 and 50,000 barrels per day.

abo/iff/lam/fm

The post Syria recovers country’s largest oilfield first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

446
 
 

Wafa informed that several military forces cordoned off the area, after which bulldozers entered the building and began demolishing structures.

The news agency stated that soldiers raised the Israeli flag inside the UN agency’s headquarters.

Israel began an offensive against UNRWA in 2014, when it passed two laws prohibiting the agency from any activity in the country and the occupied Palestinian territories, sparking a wave of global condemnation.

UNRWA has provided, for decades, education, healthcare, and aid to millions of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, as well as in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan.

Israel accuses the agency of allegedly employing Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip who participated in the October 7, 2013, strike on the country, although subsequent UN investigations refuted these claims.

abo/iff/lam/rob

The post Israel begins demolishing UNRWA complex in occupied Jerusalem first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

447
 
 

This article by Rafael Ramírez originally appeared in the January 20, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

The National Front for the Rescue of the Mexican Countryside maintains an open confrontation with the government over agri-food policy and the USMCA Free Trade Agreement, warned Eraclio Rodríguez, leader of the peasant organization.

A month ago, the Front mobilized in Mexico City to demand solutions to their water and security demands. Rodríguez reported in an interview with El Sol de México that although they did achieve some progress regarding water concessions, the Front will no longer maintain dialogue with the Undersecretary of the Interior, César Yáñez, as they believe the meetings have not resulted in concrete solutions.

The leader acknowledged that the main point of conflict remains the country’s trade policy, particularly the government’s refusal to review the exclusion of basic grains from the USMCA Free Trade Agreement, which —he warned— puts the viability of national agriculture and livestock farming at risk.

The notoriously corrupt World Cup organizer FIFA, has been for its secret deals with, and tax breaks from, the Mexican federal and state governments; super-charging gentrification, and awarding a farcical “Peace Prize” for the genocidal zionist President Donald Trump, who recently kidnapped the President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in a January 3rd attack.

He questioned the decree imposing tariffs on meat imported from Brazil , arguing that the central problem is not South America, but rather the massive influx of agricultural products from the United States. He pointed out that, despite the announced measures, a quota of up to 70,000 tons of US meat remains in place, severely impacting domestic producers.

“While the United States is selling off its cattle, Mexico is becoming overrun with animals. If this isn’t addressed, our livestock industry will also collapse,” he warned.

In this context, he reported that the Front had been invited to participate in the so-called “advisory group” of the USMCA review process, although he expressed doubts about whether their proposals would actually be considered. “If we’re just going to be there without our opinions mattering, then what’s the point?” he questioned.

“If there’s no agreement, there’s no World Cup either.”

Rodríguez issued a high-impact political warning, stating that without fundamental agreements, the rural sector could disappear. “If there’s no agreement, there’s no World Cup either,” he asserted, noting that while cities like Guadalajara, Monterrey, and Mexico City are moving forward with preparations for the 2026 World Cup , millions of rural producers see their capital, their jobs, and a livelihood passed down through generations at risk.

As part of the movement’s strategy, it announced that a national meeting between academics, students, consumers and the rural sector will be convened in February at UNAM, with the participation of universities such as Chapingo and the Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University, with the aim of broadening social support for the demands of the countryside.

Rodríguez added that the movement now demands a direct channel with the Secretary of Security and Citizen Protection, Omar García Harfuch, to effectively address the security problems faced by the movement’s allied transport workers.

“With César Yáñez, only officials meet, but no decisions are made. We are no longer going to engage in dialogue at that level. We want to speak directly with Secretary Omar García Harfuch to provide real solutions for the transport workers,” he stated.

Rodríguez emphasized that the National Front and the National Association of Transporters (ANTAC) form a single bloc of demands. “We are one and the same. What happens to the transporters is directly detrimental to the peasant movement, and we will defend them,” he stressed.

Finally, he reiterated that the Front and the truckers will remain mobilized until there is a direct response from the federal government at the ministry level, particularly regarding highway safety and fair conditions for grain transport. “This is no longer a temporary issue. We are united,” he concluded.

  • Mexican Farmers Will Stop World Cup

    News Briefs

    Mexican Farmers Will Stop World Cup

    January 20, 2026January 20, 2026

    Campesinos, who shut down border crossings and major highways twice last year and face ruin due to the dumping of US crops, believe the government is sacrificing Mexican agriculture in order to secure a USMCA deal.

  • People’s Mañanera January 19

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera January 19

    January 19, 2026January 20, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with the ever-frequent reading of the polls, raising revenue without raising taxes, Salinas Pliego tax debt comes due, US Hercules plane landing in Mexico, and Mexican dying in ICE custody.

  • Our Water, In Whose Hands?

    Analysis

    Our Water, In Whose Hands?

    January 19, 2026

    A promising vision from President Sheinbaum for public water management rapidly disappeared. Yet again the Mexican state openly assumes the role it has always played under neoliberalism: facilitating access to natural resources for special interests.

The post Mexican Farmers Will Stop World Cup appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

448
 
 

Prime Minister Judith Suminwa Tuluka announced urgent measures during an emergency meeting held on Monday, where she, along with members of her cabinet and security services, assessed the situation after the withdrawal of the Congo River Alliance-March 23 Movement (AFC/M23).

Suminwa Tuluka emphasized that the nearly two-month occupation by the AFC/M23 resulted in the displacement of at least 267,000 people, including 12,000 unaccompanied children; therefore, preparing the conditions for their return is a priority.

The head of Government instructed the Ministry of Social Affairs and the General Directorate of Migration (DGM) to address the issue, but clarified that no return operation would be authorized without a prior assessment of the condition of the homes, to avoid creating greater vulnerability.

Government Spokesperson Patrick Muyaya, while reporting on the meeting, emphasized that the prime minister focused on the effective restoration of public services in Uvira as the leading challenge, where AFC/M23 agents are believed to still be present.

abo/iff/lam/kmg

The post DRC government organizes humanitarian aid and operations in Uvira first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

449
 
 

Sponsored by Djiboutian President Ismail Omar Guelleh, the January 19-21 event brings together scientists, political leaders, representatives of international organizations, and climate experts from across the region and the world.

Dr. Jalludin Mohamed, Director General of Djibouti’s Center for Research Studies, emphasized, in his speech, the urgency of taking action in the face of climate change affecting the region.

Professor Daniel Olago, Director of the Institute for Climate Change and Adaptation at the University of Nairobi, highlighted the importance of training a new generation of researchers equipped with 21st-century technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, to address the multidimensional challenges of climate change.

Djiboutian Minister of Higher Education and Research Nabil Mohamed Ahmed reaffirmed the nation’s commitment to placing science, innovation, and international cooperation at the heart of its climate adaptation strategy.

The event includes thematic sessions, workshops, and scientific presentations designed to transform discussions into actionable recommendations and concrete initiatives. abo/iff/lam/nmr

The post Djibouti hosts International Forum on Adaptation to Climate Change first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

450
 
 

The head of Moldovan diplomacy stated that the Ministry is currently drafting the denunciation of the agreements that are the legal basis of the organization, in particular the CIS Agreement and its protocol, as well as the CIS statute.

The minister explained that once the new parliamentary session begins, the denunciation documents will be submitted to the legislature.

The diplomat noted, “We will probably conclude the procedures at the governmental level by mid-February.

After that, Parliament will make the decision.”

Popsoi underscored that if Parliament approves the withdrawal of the three constituent agreements and President Maia Sandu ratifies them after the completion of the technical stages, Moldova will cease to be a member of the CIS.

The Moldovan government approved in November 2025 the withdrawal of seven agreements signed within the CIS.

abo/iff/lam/gfa

The post Moldova launches process to withdraw from CIS first appeared on Prensa Latina.


From Prensa Latina via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›