Latin American Publications!

123 readers
48 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
276
 
 

By Thierry Deronne  –  Jan 26, 2026

“Enough of Washington’s orders to Venezuelan politicians. It is Venezuelan politics that will resolve our differences and internal conflicts. We have had enough of dictates from foreign powers. Our republic has already suffered enough from the consequences of fascism and extremism.” These were the words of Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s acting president, to oil workers in the state of Anzoategui, in the east of the country, on January 25.

She announced the creation of a new economic fund specifically designed to improve the income of the Venezuelan working class. Direct instructions to the vice-presidency for the economy aim to raise the necessary funds to strengthen purchasing power and offer improved social protection for workers. This measure will be accompanied by digital innovations. A new technological platform will replace the Patria Platform to ensure that these resources reach beneficiaries effectively and to adjust wage policies and bonuses in favor of workers’ well-being. Trump is seeking to present the fact that he has revived the oil agreements drawn up under Nicolás Maduro’s presidency as a victory, though Trump himself blocked these agreements by imposing multiple sanctions under pressure from the US far right. Delcy Rodríguez explained that the sale of Venezuelan oil will be used primarily to protect workers’ incomes.

This continues the protectionist policies implemented by President Nicolás Maduro–a former union leader–to combat the (over one thousand) sanctions  imposed by the US and the US and EU blockade. He is one of the few heads of state who has not succumbed to the siren call of austerity. When he began by periodically increasing wages by 25% or 50%, the private sector offset these increases by raising its prices proportionally. Faced with an inflationary spiral, Maduro decided to reactivate the national productive apparatus through multipolar alliances. This was done not only to reduce dependence on oil revenues but also to replenish state coffers, notably by taxing the wealthiest citizens.

Venezuela’s Central Bank has thus begun to recover valuable resources to intervene in the foreign exchange market and defend the currency. The objective: to rebuild public services and gradually increase workers’ benefits while simultaneously limiting the inflation that is eroding them. A China-style strategy: maintain and strengthen the state as a strategic player in the economy.

As a result, the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) reports that Venezuela has had the highest growth rate (6.5%) in South America for the past four years. For the first time in 150 years of oil production, the country is close to achieving food sovereignty and produces almost 100% of the food it consumes.

When, in February 2025, Donald Trump revoked Chevron’s license in an attempt to further strangle Venezuela’s economy, President Maduro responded by expanding the market to Asia and handing over the 5,258,000th home built by his administration to a working-class family. On May 1, 2025, he increased the “economic war allowance” from [US] $90 to $120 for 20 million families. An important point when studying purchasing power in Venezuela is that despite Western sanctions, and unlike under neoliberal regimes, public services and basic necessities are very cheap in Venezuela. Subsidized gasoline—the cheapest in the world (US 50 ¢/liter)—water, gas, electricity, internet, subway, etc., are available at low prices. Food distributed monthly by the government to the population in response to the blockade costs only 5% of the market price. Many health centers, as well as public education and culture centers, operate free of charge.

While in the West, a growing number of families struggle to make ends meet, Venezuelan workers flock to the shops and businesses that open daily. Caracas is filled with commercial music, and traffic jams form early in the morning around the giant malls. Thousands of Venezuelan migrants fled the impoverishment they endured in their host countries and returned home on the free, public airline long before the deportations and human rights violations perpetrated by the Trump regime.

Workers mobilized in the streets of Caracas to demand the release of President Maduro and his wife on January 15 and 23, 2026. Photo: Nathan Ramírez.

Workers mobilized in the streets of Caracas to demand the release of President Maduro and his wife on January 15 and 23, 2026. Photo: Nathan Ramírez.

“The Venezuelan people do not accept any orders from outside,” continued Delcy Rodríguez during the meeting with energy sector officials , members of the legislative branch, and national and foreign business leaders, convened to discuss the public consultation on the partial reform of the Organic Law on Hydrocarbons. “The Venezuelan people have a government, and this government obeys the people. Reciprocity characterizes the relationship between the Venezuelan people, their authorities, and their institutions.”

“We are also not afraid to maintain respectful relations with the United States,” she added, “but these must be based on respect: respect for international law, basic human decency in interpersonal relationships, and respect for the dignity and history of Venezuela. As for the personal threats I receive, I want you to know that I was already aware of them when I took office.”

Caracas: Demonstrators in Caracas demand the liberation of their president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores. Photo: Nathan Ramírez.

Caracas: Demonstrators in Caracas demand the liberation of their president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores. Photo: Nathan Ramírez.

From the very first hours following the abduction of President Maduro and his wife, and with no prior knowledge of Venezuela, many left-wing activists became “bots” in the US psychological warfare campaign. The refrain “Delcy betrayed Maduro” was hammered home relentlessly, blindly and with fervor, as if it were an absolute truth. The intensity of the media and online bombardment could have produced doubt, but it seems that by 2026, their capacity to resist these networks and media has eroded even further.

From Caracas, independent journalist Craig Murray dismantled this narrative that the media empires have desperately tried to make us believe: “One narrative which the Western powers are desperate to have you believe is that Acting President Delcy Rodríguez betrayed Maduro and facilitated his capture. That is not what Maduro believes. It is not what his party believes, and I have been unable to find the slightest indication that anybody believes this in Venezuela.

“The security services house journal, the Guardian, published about five articles making this claim, and flagged it as front-page lead and a major scoop. Yet, all of the sources for the Guardian story are still the same US government sources or Machado supporters from the wealthy Miami community of exiled capitalist parasites.

“What is interesting is why the security services wish you to believe that Delcy Rodríguez and her brother Jorge, Speaker of the National Assembly, are agents for the USA. Opposition to US imperialism has defined their entire lives since their father was tortured to death at the behest of the CIA when they were infants. They are both vocal in their continuing support for the Bolivarian Revolution and personally for Maduro. The obvious [US] American motive is to split and weaken the ruling party in Caracas and undermine the government of Venezuela.”

Photo 3: Mobilization of the NUMSA union, in Johannesburg, South Africa, January 24, 2026.

Mobilization of the NUMSA union, in Johannesburg, South Africa, January 24, 2026. Source: NUMSA.

The support of Venezuelan workers, who took to the streets en masse with their organizations to demand the release of Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores, is bolstered by that of powerful movements in the Global South. These include the Landless Workers’ Movement (MST), with nearly two million members and highly mobilized in Brazil, and NUMSA, South Africa’s largest trade union, which also demands the release of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores. “Today it’s Venezuela. Tomorrow it will be South Africa,” warned Irvin Jim, general secretary of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA), which boasts over 460,000 members. Irvin emphasized the need for an “anti-imperialist front to mobilize workers” beyond partisan and union affiliations: NUMSA “will soon organize a political symposium” to which all progressive political parties in the country will be invited. “It is high time to unite the working class … behind a revolutionary program,” as South Africa faces increasing aggression from the US far right.

In contrast, French Trotskyists brandished a leaflet from the CUTV (Union of Venezuelan Workers) about so-called “union repression” and, without knowing the reality of Venezuela, immediately endorsed it to distance themselves from the demand to free Maduro and maintain a routine anti-imperialism: “We support the Venezuelan people.” The author of the leaflet is Pedro Eusse, a member of the former leadership of the Venezuelan Communist Party, a group of about 15 people who for years have been flooding the world with communiqués about the “neoliberal, fascist dictatorship of Maduro” (sic). This “union” is in fact just a disguise “for the international community,” the typical “local endorsement” that Western leftists need. This manipulation is explained in detail in the article: “Rebirth and Victory of the Venezuelan Communist Party.”

Since the publication of Persian Letters [in 1721], the use of distant countries to settle internal French political scores has been a tradition. This was already the case with the text co-signed in August 2024 by the NPA (New Anticapitalist Party), the Socialist Party, and Clémentine Autain, who together denounced the “Maduro dictatorship.” The statement expressed “particular indignation” at Maduro’s mention of “re-education camps.” In reality, the president had asked of the relevant minister that far-right militants or mercenaries, despite being guilty of destroying public services and assassinating “Black people, therefore Chavistas,” be allowed to learn a trade in prison. Their early release, initiated by President Maduro in December—presented by the media as the “release of political prisoners”—demonstrates the Bolivarian government’s extreme commitment to national unity and reconciliation in its hope that these people, used by Venezuelan oligarchs, will not return to violence and will agree to enter the democratic, electoral field, as the moderate right has done.

Delcy Rodríguez Rejects US ‘Orders’ as Venezuela Advances Hydrocarbons Law Reform

(Venezuela Infos)

Translated by Orinoco Tribune

OT/SL/JRE


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

277
 
 

This article originally appeared in the January 29, 2026 edition of Sin Embargo.

Mexico City. The Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs ( SRE ) categorically denied on Wednesday that its consular network in the United States (US) had sought to influence the internal political processes of that country, after President Donald Trump promoted on his social media a new book that warns of an alleged “ invisible coup ” against the US.

In a statement, the Foreign Ministry declared that what has been disseminated in some media outlets are unfounded falsehoods, since the work of Mexico’s consular network in the United States is based on the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and on the respect, commitment and reciprocity established by the 1943 Consular Convention between Mexico and the United States.

“The activities and programs of Mexican consulates are carried out in close coordination with local, state, and federal authorities, always with full respect for U.S. laws and the principle of non-intervention in internal affairs. Therefore, any claim to the contrary is unfounded and untrue,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (SRE) wrote, also citing President Claudia Sheinbaum’s foreign policy, based on the principle of non-intervention and full respect for the sovereignty, institutions, and legal processes of each country.

“The activities and programs of Mexican consulates are carried out in close coordination with local, state, and federal authorities, always with full respect for U.S. laws and the principle of non-intervention in internal affairs. Therefore, any claim to the contrary is unfounded and untrue,” the Foreign Ministry added, reaffirming that, according to the principles of the Mexican government, “Mexican consular offices do not promote or participate, directly or indirectly, in demonstrations, protests, or any type of political mobilization within the United States.”

Book Warns of “Coup” Against US

On Wednesday, Donald Trump promoted on his social media the book The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon, by Peter Schweizer, whose publication accuses the Mexican government of organizing an “invisible coup” against the US by “using mass migration as a political weapon to influence elections and undermine national security.”

“Mexico has 53 consulates in the United States, while the United Kingdom and China have six and seven, respectively. As I argue in the book, consular officials are busy supporting political activities (in the U.S.), trying to influence the presidential elections,” Schweizer stated on CBS News’ Takeout interview program with Major Garrett. “I think it’s inappropriate for the Mexican government and its diplomats to be involved in this type of political activity within the United States.”

In the book, the author points out that former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) visited US cities in February 2017 to call on Mexican migrants to oppose the anti-immigrant policies promoted by Trump, while in the case of Claudia Sheinbaum, Schweizer said that the President played the song The Migrant Anthem during a press conference.

“And although my birth certificate says American, I am pure Mexican […] We changed places but not flags/I have the green, white and red in my veins,” the song says, according to Schweizer, who even accused Morena Senator Gerardo Fernández Noroña of openly speaking of “reconquering” the United States by referring in the Congress of the Union to California, Texas and New Mexico, among other areas, as “occupied territories.”

The post Mexican Government Rejects Accusations of Interference in US through Consulates appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

278
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez has officially received the insignia of commander-in-chief of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB), during a solemn ceremony at the Bolivarian Military University’s Courtyard of Honor in Caracas.

Accompanied by Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino, National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez, and Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, the acting president was honored by military authorities this Wednesday, January 28.

Cabello opened the ceremony, stating that Venezuela faces a complex situation following the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores by the US empire. “Our loyalty to the National Constitution and its acting president is absolute,” he stated, “because we understand that defending her administration is defending the continuity of the government and the integrity of the Venezuelan people.”

Minister Padrino reaffirmed the FANB’s support for Rodríguez, awarding her symbolic military insignia, including the Baton of Command and a replica of the sword of the Liberator Simón Bolívar. He emphasized that the FANB will act in accordance with the Constitution and the most recent interpretation by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), confirming that the high military command and the entire army remain under her leadership.

In an earlier announcement on social media, the defense minister highlighted the legitimacy of the acting president—both in the origin of her position and in constitutional practice—and ratified the full support of the military institution in the defense of the country, the preservation of peace, and the facilitation of reconciliation and democratic processes.

The ceremony featured 3,200 soldiers from the FANB’s five components—the Bolivarian Army, Navy, Air Force, National Guard, and Militia—deployed across Venezuela’s eight strategic regions of comprehensive defense. In military formation, the troops swore to continue the ideals of Simón Bolívar, revived by Hugo Chávez, and linked to the leadership of Nicolás Maduro. Analysts have noted that the act demonstrates the monolithic unity of all state institutions and the constitutionally elected Chavista leadership.

“Our Liberator Father Bolívar, the man of difficulties, was known not only for his giant and immense victories, but also for his defeats, for his countless defeats and misfortunes,” Rodríguez recalled, adding: “I ask you that the same spirit of the Liberator, the greatest in the universe, may take hold of you to open the new paths that we must take today to defend the homeland.”

She stated that it is up to the military youth to guarantee the splendid future of a free homeland, explaining that she comes “with the strength of our history and with the strength of the power of the Venezuelan people.”

Venezuela as a Turning Point in a Fragmented Region

National Office for Cyber Defense
During the ceremony, Rodríguez announced the creation of the National Office for Cyber Defense and Security of Venezuela, which will be attached to the Council of Vice Presidents.

The office will be headed by the Minister of Science and Technology, Gabriela Jiménez. Rodríguez asked the nation’s scientists and technology experts to unite with the Military Scientific Council to apply their capabilities toward the defense of Venezuelan cyberspace, less than a month the atrocious military attack by the US empire that violated Venezuela’s sovereignty.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

279
 
 

The acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, has confirmed that respectful and courteous communication channels have been established with the government of the US empire.

“I reaffirm what President Donald Trump has said,” she stated this Tuesday, January 27, “that we have established respectful and courteous communication channels, both with the president of the US and with Secretary Marco Rubio, with whom we are establishing a working agenda.”

During the inauguration of the nephrology service at the University Hospital of Caracas, Rodríguez highlighted the Chavista government’s willingness to resolve differences with the US administration through political and diplomatic channels under conditions of mutual respect.

She announced that she successfully secured the unfreezing of Venezuela’s sovereign resources, which will allow for significant investment in hospital equipment—including items purchased from the US entity and other countries—as well as equipment for the nation’s electricity and gas industries.

Analysts have noted that the announcement by the Venezuelan leader likely refers to state funds frozen in international banking institutions since 2019. Under the failed US-led Guaidó regime change attempt, billions of dollars were illegally frozen, alongside the seizure of 31 tons of gold by the Bank of England.

Fund allocation and social protection
Rodríguez reported that the resources will be directed into two existing funds. The first is dedicated to addressing social needs, including worker income, health, education, food, and general social protection. The second sovereign fund will address public services and infrastructure, including electricity, water, and roads.

Additionally, the acting president reiterated her previous announcement regarding the creation of a public digital platform. This tool will allow any citizen to log in and view active projects, as well as the reported income resulting from the unfreezing of Venezuela’s resources.

China Reaffirms Solidarity with Venezuela and Cuba Against US Aggression, Upholds Sovereignty

She also condemned the ongoing disinformation campaigns by transnational mainstream media corporations, asserting that the truth about Venezuela prevails over defamation, and that the stability and peace of the country will always remain prioritized.

Finally, Rodríguez highlighted the importance of diplomatic dialogue to resolve controversies on sensitive issues, as well as “other less sensitive issues, but which should be on the agenda of what should be respectful relations within the framework of the international community between sovereign and independent countries.”

(Alba Ciudad) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

280
 
 

By Khaled Barakat  –  Jan 27, 2026

The convening of the conference of the Masar Badil, the Palestinian Alternative Revolutionary Path Movement, in March 2026 in the city of São Paulo, Brazil will not be a routine organizational event. Rather, it represents a concentrated expression of a deeper political transformation the movement has undergone over the past five years, alongside a parallel shift in the position of the Palestinian shatat within the equation of struggle against the Zionist project. What is taking place today cannot be read as a mere accumulation of activities, but as a qualitative advance of a revolutionary condition that has become a genuine source of disturbance to the Zionist enemy and its allies.

Within a relatively short period of time, the Alternative Revolutionary Path has succeeded in moving from a nascent framework to an international political actor, by building organizational and popular presence in North America and Europe, and by leading a series of conferences and popular mobilizations that have restored the centrality of Palestinian international action in the diaspora. This trajectory has broken the constraints imposed by the Madrid–Oslo phase, during which the diaspora was stripped of its role and relations with the world were confined to official channels and complicit regimes, at the expense of the natural relationship with peoples and liberation movements.

In this context, the organization of the “Week of Return and Liberation” in Brussels in 2022, along with the mass demonstrations that accompanied it in several European capitals, marked an important station in the movement’s development. Thousands of demonstrators, Palestinians, Arabs, and internationalists, took to the streets carrying images of resistance martyrs and symbols of the prisoner movement, chanting for the “Jenin Battalion” and the “Lions’ Den,” in scenes that went beyond the logic of “humanitarian solidarity” toward clear political participation. These mobilizations were organized with the endorsement of one hundred parties and movements. The failure of Zionist entity ambassadors to suppress or defame them indicated a real shift in the balance of action within the arenas of the diaspora.

The movement and its supporters also succeeded in organizing a massive popular march on October 6, 2024, in the heart of the Spanish capital Madrid, on the margins of its general conference. This march reaffirmed a clear position in support of the resistance in the Gaza Strip, despite attempts by the Zionist entity to cancel the march and criminalize the Alternative Revolutionary Path. From within this revolutionary orientation, the Tariq al-Tahrir network emerged as the movement’s youth and student arm.

In my view, the significance of this advance lies in the clarity of the political line adopted by the movement. The Alternative Revolutionary Path does not engage in linguistic maneuvering, nor does it hide behind ambiguous slogans. Rather, it declares an explicit position rejecting the “two-state solution” as a liquidationist project, and restores centrality to the goal of liberating Palestine from the river to the sea, as a unifying framework for national and social struggle. It is precisely this clarity that has made the movement a direct target of repression and criminalization, including attempts to place its organizations on so-called “terrorist lists.”

Yet this frenzied attack has exposed the depth of the anxiety provoked by the movement. Organizations such as the Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, the Alkarama Palestinian Women’s Movement, the Tariq al-Tahrir Network, and other mass frameworks affiliated with the Alternative Revolutionary Path have not been targeted because they are weak, but because they represent a genuine nucleus of an international popular base that transcends the logic of non-governmental organizations. They reconnect the diaspora with the resistance in Palestine, particularly with the prisoners’ movement and the refugee camps and the environments of resistance in the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

The Irreversible Balance: Israel’s Ledger, 2025

In this context, the movement also advances a necessary critical approach to the experience of the boycott movement, recognizing it as an important tool that must not be separated from the right of return and the struggles of refugees, prisoners, and resistance, nor transformed into a substitute for a revolutionary project of change. Boycott, without a clear liberatory political horizon, risks being emptied of its content and absorbed into sanitized liberal frameworks.

The convening of the São Paulo conference carries an additional significance that goes beyond the Palestinian dimension. It comes from Latin America, a continent where US imperialism continues to plunder the wealth and subjugate the peoples of the region, where colonial memory remains alive, and where popular struggles still see Palestine as a mirror of their own battles. It affirms that the world is wider than the imperial center, and that building an international popular base passes through Asia, Africa, and South America, just as it passes through the very heart of the colonial states themselves.

In sum, what the Alternative Revolutionary Path puts forward is not a ready-made formula for liberation, but a restoration of fundamental truths that were deliberately obscured: there is no liberation without organization, no resistance without the masses, and no confrontation with the Zionist movement without shattering the illusions of settlement produced by the Oslo era. From this standpoint, the March 2026 conference marks the declaration of entry into a new phase of open political confrontation, in light of the results of the ongoing genocidal war in occupied Palestine. This revolutionary momentum, led by Palestinian and international forces at the vanguard, is pressing forward with determination to once again transform exile and diaspora from a space of solidarity into a space of confrontation.

(Masar Badil)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

281
 
 

Caracas, January 29, 2026 (venezuelanalysis.com) – US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the Trump administration’s January 3 attack on Venezuela and kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro during a Senate hearing on Wednesday.

“[Having Maduro in power] was an enormous strategic risk for the United States,“ Rubio said in his testimony to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. “It was an untenable situation, and it had to be addressed.”

The Trump official claimed that the military operation aimed to “aid law enforcement” and did not constitute an act of war. He likewise emphasized the White House’s concern about Venezuela allegedly being a “base of operations” for US geopolitical rivals Iran, Russia, and China.

Rubio faced criticism from multiple senators, with Rand Paul arguing that the White House would consider a similar attack directed against the US as an act of war. Despite widespread criticism from Democrats and a handful of Republicans, efforts to pass War Powers resolutions have been narrowly defeated in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores pleaded not guilty to charges including drug trafficking conspiracy in a New York federal court on January 5. US officials have never presented evidence tying high-ranking Venezuelan leaders to narcotics activities, and specialized agencies have consistently found the Caribbean nation to play a marginal role in global drug trafficking.

The Venezuelan government, led by Acting President Delcy Rodríguez, has repeatedly denounced the US attack and demanded the release of Maduro and Flores. At the same time, Rodríguez and other officials have advocated for renewed diplomatic engagement to settle “differences” with Washington.

The January 3 strikes, which killed 100 people, have drawn widespread condemnation in Latin America and beyond. A recent Progressive International summit in Colombia called for a joint regional response against US aggression.

During Wednesday’s hearing, Rubio reiterated the US government’s plans to control the Venezuelan oil sector and impose conditions on the acting Rodríguez administration. He added that the White House is seeking stability in the South American country ahead of a “democratic transition.”

Rubio additionally confirmed that Washington is administering Venezuelan oil sales, with proceeds deposited in US-controlled bank accounts in Qatar before a portion is rerouted to Caracas. He added that at some point the funds will run through US Treasury accounts.

Democratic senators questioned the legality and transparency of the present arrangement. The Secretary of State further claimed that Caracas would need to submit a “budget request” before accessing its funds.

The initial deal reportedly comprised some 50 million barrels of oil, worth around $2 billion, that had accumulated due to a US naval blockade of Venezuelan exports. After a reported $300 million were turned over to Venezuelan private banks last week, the Venezuelan Central Bank announced that a further $200 million will be made available in early February.

Venezuelan banks are offering the foreign currency in auction to customers, with officials vowing  priority for imports in the food and healthcare sectors.

According to Reuters, the US Treasury Department is preparing a general license to allow select corporations to engage in oil dealings with Caracas. Since 2017, the Venezuelan oil industry has been under wide-reaching unilateral coercive measures, including financial sanctions, an export embargo, and secondary sanctions.

In his address, Rubio went on to state that Venezuelan authorities “deserve credit for eradicating Chávez-era restrictions on private investment” in the oil industry, in reference to a recent overhaul of the country’s 2001 Hydrocarbons preliminarily approved last week. He added that a portion of oil revenues will be used for imports from US manufacturers.

On Tuesday, Acting President Rodríguez announced during a televised broadcast that Venezuela was importing medical equipment from the US using “unblocked funds.”

The Venezuelan leader emphasized the importance of relations based on mutual respect with the US and rejected claims that her government is subject to dictates from foreign actors. She affirmed that there are open “communication channels” with the Trump administration and collaboration with Rubio on a “working agenda.”

The acting authorities in Caracas have sought to promote a significant rebound of crude production by offering expanded benefits to private investors as part of the reform bill. Expected to be finally approved in the coming weeks, the new law abrogates provisions introduced under former President Hugo Chávez to ensure majority state control over the oil sector in favor of flexible arrangements granting substantial autonomy to corporate partners.

The post Rubio Defends US Military Operation, Praises Venezuela Oil Reform appeared first on Venezuelanalysis.


From Venezuelanalysis via This RSS Feed.

282
 
 

Lebanese journalist and imam Sheikh Ali Noureddine was killed on Monday in a targeted Zionist drone strike in Sour (Tyre). With Noureddine’s killing, the number of media workers killed by the Israeli occupation in Lebanon has risen to 20.

An Israeli drone strike hit a vehicle in a crowded commercial area of Sour yesterday afternoon, killing Noureddine and wounding two others. The attack marked another violation of the November 2024 ceasefire between Lebanon and the Israeli occupation.

Hezbollah Media Relations condemned the assassination in a statement, describing it as a “war crime” and part of a long series of “brutal crimes against journalists, civilians, and humanity as a whole.” The statement called on journalists, media institutions, unions, and political and intellectual figures to escalate action in local, Arab, and international forums, particularly legal and human rights channels to “curb this Zionist savagery.”

‘Israel’ Attacks Press in Lebanon, Al Mayadeen Mourns Two Colleagues

Separately, the Lebanese Foreign Ministry has once again submitted a complaint to the UN over continued Israeli violations of Lebanese sovereignty. The communique included three detailed tables listing daily Israeli violations during October, November, and December of last year, amounting to over 2,000 breaches (542, 691, and 803 respectively).

Last July, Noureddine took to social media to publicly criticize the Lebanese ruling class for its inaction in face of daily Israeli airstrikes.

Beyond his media career, Noureddine was a prominent religious figure in the South. He previously worked as an anchor and program host on Al-Manar TV and also served as the imam of the Al-Housh town mosque in Tyre.

(al-akhbar)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

283
 
 

By Craig Murray  –  Jan 26, 2026

I have now been in Caracas for 48 hours and the contrast between what I have seen, and what I had read in the mainstream media, could not be more stark.

I drove right through Caracas, from the airport through the city centre and up to posh Las Mercedes. The next morning I walked all through and weaved my way within the working class district of San Agustin. I joined in the “Afrodescendants festival”, and spent hours mingling with the people. I was made extremely welcome and invited into many homes – this from a district they tell you is extremely dangerous.

I must admit I had great fun at this bit.

After this I continued on for miles walking through the residential area and through the heart of the city centre, including Bolivar Square and the National Assembly.

In all of this I have not seen one single checkpoint, whether police or military. I have seen almost no guns; fewer than you would see on a similar tour taking in Whitehall. I have not been stopped once, whether on foot or in a car. I have seen absolutely zero sign of “Chavista militia” whether in poor, wealthy or central areas. I drove extensively round the opposition strongholds of Las Mercedes and Altamira and quite literally saw not a single armed policemen, not one militia man and not one soldier. People were out and about quite happily and normally. There was no feeling of repression whatsoever.

Again, nobody stopped me or asked who I am or why I was taking pictures. I did ask the Venezuelan authorities whether I needed a permit to take photos and publish articles, and their reply was a puzzled “why would you?”

The military checkpoints to maintain control, the roving gangs of Chavista armed groups, all the media descriptions of Caracas today are entirely a figment of CIA and Machado propaganda, simply regurgitated by a complicit billionaire and state media.

Do you know what else do not exist? The famous “shortages.” The only thing in short supply is shortage. There is a shortage of shortage. There is no shortage of anything in Venezuela.

A few weeks ago I saw on Twitter a photo of a supermarket in Caracas which somebody had put up to demonstrate that the shelves are extremely well stocked. It received hundreds of replies, either claiming it was a fake, or that it was an elite supermarket for the wealthy and that the shops for the majority were empty.

So I made a point, in working-class districts, of going into the neighbourhood, front room stores where ordinary people do their shopping. They were all very well stocked. There were no empty places on shelves. I also went round outdoor and covered markets, including an improbably huge one with over a hundred stalls catering solely for children’s birthday parties!

Everyone was quite happy to let me photograph anything I wanted. It is not just groceries. Hardware stores, opticians, clothes and shoe shops, electronic goods, auto parts. Everything is freely available.

There is a lack of physical currency. Sanctions have limited the Venezuelan government’s access to secure printing. To get round this, everybody does secure payment with their phones via QR code using the Venezuelan Central Bank’s own ingenious app. This is incredibly well established – even the most basic street vendors have their QR code displayed and get their payments this way. Can you spot the QR codes on these street stalls?

To get a Venezuelan phone and sim card for the internet I went to a mall which specialises in phones. It was extraordinary. Four storeys of little phone and computer shops, all packed with goods, organised in three concentric circles of tiered balconies. This photo is just the inner circle. I picked up a phone, sim card, lapel microphones, power bank, multi-system extension lead and ethernet to USB adapter, all in the first little store I entered.

Registering the sim was quick and simple. There is good 4G everywhere I have been in Caracas, and some spots of 5G.

“Relaxed” is a word I would use for Venezuelans. You could forgive paranoia, the country having been bombed by the Americans just three weeks ago and many people killed. You might expect hostility to a rather strange old gringo wandering around inexplicably snapping random things. But I have experienced no sense of hostility at all, from people or officials.

The African festival was instructive. A community event and not a political rally, there were nevertheless numerous spontaneous shouts and chants for Maduro. The Catholic priest giving the blessing at the festivities suddenly started talking of the genocide in Gaza and everybody prayed for Palestine. Community and cultural figures continually referenced socialism.

This is the natural environment here. None of it is forced. Chavez empowered the downtrodden and improved their lives in a spectacular manner, for which there are few parallels. The result is genuine popular enthusiasm and a level of public working-class engagement with political thought that it is impossible to compare to the UK today. It is the antithesis of the hollowed out culture that has spawned Reform.

I am very wary of Western journalists who parachute into a country and become instant experts. Although the stark contradiction between actual Caracas and Western-media Caracas is so extreme that I can bring it to you immediately.

Pretty well everything that I have read by Western journalists which can be immediately checked – checkpoints, armed political gangs, climate of fear, shortages of food and goods – turns out to be an absolute lie. I did not know this before I came. Possibly neither did you. We both do now.

I had lived for years in Nigeria and Uzbekistan under real dictatorships and I know what they feel like. I can tell sullen compliance from real engagement. I can tell spontaneous from programmed political expression. This is no dictatorship.

I am, so far as I can judge, the only Western journalist in Venezuela now. The idea that you should actually see for yourself what is happening, rather than reproduce what the Western governments and their agents tell you is happening, appears utterly out of fashion with our mainstream media. I am sure this is deliberate.

When I was in Lebanon a year ago, the mainstream media were entirely absent as Israel devastated Dahiya, the Bekaa Valley, and Southern Lebanon, because it was a narrative they did not want to report.

Disgracefully, the only time the BBC entered Southern Lebanon was from the Israeli side, embedded with the IDF.

The BBC, Guardian or New York Times simply will not send a correspondent to Caracas because the reality is so starkly different from the official narrative.

One narrative which the Western powers are desperate to have you believe is that Acting President Delcy Rodríguez betrayed Maduro and facilitated his capture. That is not what Maduro believes. It is not what his party believes, and I have been unable to find the slightest indication that anybody believes this in Venezuela.

The security services house journal, the Guardian, published about their fifth article making this claim, and flagged it as front-page lead and a major scoop. Yet all of the sources for the Guardian story are still the same US government sources, or Machado supporters from the wealthy Miami community of exiled capitalist parasites.

What is interesting is why the security services wish you to believe that Delcy Rodríguez and her brother Jorge, Speaker of the National Assembly, are agents for the USA. Opposition to US Imperialism has defined their entire lives since their father was tortured to death at the behest of the CIA when they were infants. They are both vocal in their continuing support for the Bolivarian Revolution and personally for Maduro.

The obvious American motive is to split and weaken the ruling party in Caracas and undermine the government of Venezuela. That was my reading. But it has also been suggested to me that Trump is pushing heavily the line that Rodríguez is pro-American in order both to claim victory, and to justify his lack of support for Machado. Rubio and many like him are keen to see Machado installed, but Trump’s assessment that she does not have the support to run the country seems from here entirely correct.

A variation on this that has also been suggested to me is that Trump wants to portray Rodríguez as pro-American to reassure American oil companies it is safe to invest (though exactly why he wants that is something of a mystery).

Meanwhile of course the USA seizes, steals and sells Venezuelan oil with no justification at all in international law. The proceeds are kept in Qatar under Trump’s personal control and are building up a huge slush fund he can use to bypass Congress. For those with long memories, it is like Iran/Contra on a massively inflated scale.

The Many Victims of the Attack on Caracas

I am trying to get established in Venezuela to report to you and dive much deeper into the truth from Venezuela. I am afraid I am going to say it takes money. I am looking to hire a local cinematographer so we can start to produce videos. The first may be on what happened the night of the murderous US bombings and kidnap.

I did not want to crowdfund until I was sure it was viable to produce worthwhile content for you. The expenses of getting and living here, and building the required team, to produce good work do add up. I was very proud of the content we produced from Lebanon, but ultimately disappointed that we could not crowdfund sufficiently to sustain permanent independent reporting from there.

So we now have a Venezuela reporting crowdfunder. I have simply edited the Lebanese GoFundMe crowdfunder, because that took many weeks to be approved and I don’t want to go through all that again. So its starting baseline is the £35,000 we raised and spent in Lebanon.

I do very much appreciate that I have been simultaneously crowdfunding to fight the UK government in the Scottish courts over the proscription of Palestine Action. We fight forces that have unlimited funds. We can only succeed if we spread the load. 98% of those who read my articles never contribute financially. This would be a good moment to change that. It is just the simple baseline subscriptions to my blog that have got me to Venezuela, and that remains the foundation for all my work.

Anybody is welcome to republish and reuse, including in translation.

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of subscription payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

(Craig Murray)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

284
 
 

Caracas, January 28, 2026 (venezuelanalysis.com) – International creditors have shown growing optimism to collect on defaulted Venezuelan debt in the wake of the January 3 US military strikes and kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro.

According to Bloomberg, the volume of Venezuelan bonds traded increased tenfold since the start of the year. Securities have rallied to around 40 cents on the dollar, having hit lows of 1.5 cents on the dollar in the past.

A combination of defaulted bonds, unpaid loans and arbitration awards is estimated to total up to US $170 billion after years of accruing interest. The Maduro government began defaulting on debt service in 2017 as US sanctions crippled the Caribbean nation’s economy and ultimately blocked financial transactions altogether.

The Venezuelan Creditor Committee (VCC) expressed “readiness” to discuss a debt restructuring deal when authorized. The group brings together creditors including GMO, Greylock Capital, Mangart Capital, and Morgan Stanley, which hold over $10 billion in sovereign and state oil company PDVSA bonds.

Elias Ferrer Breda, financial analyst and director of Orinoco Research, told Venezuelanalysis that the “enthusiasm” means creditors feel a debt restructuring deal is “closer,” but warned that any agreement will hinge on US recognition of the Venezuelan government.

“The recognition, along with the lifting of primary sanctions, is the final obstacle,” he said. “There have been steps to reopen the US embassy in Caracas and a Venezuelan delegation headed by Félix Plasencia also visited DC.”

The first Trump administration recognized the self-proclaimed “interim government” led by Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s legitimate authority in 2019, prompting Caracas to break diplomatic relations. After the parallel Guaidó administration dissolved in 2022, Washington transferred the recognition to the opposition-majority National Assembly whose term expired in 2021.

The small group of US-backed politicians retains control over Venezuelan-owned assets in the US. For its part, the Venezuelan government headed by Acting President Delcy Rodríguez has advocated a renewed diplomatic engagement with Washington. The two administrations have taken steps to reopen the respective embassies.

Ferrer, who also directs the Guacamaya media outlet, suggested that the State Department has no immediate plans to change its formal recognition of the defunct parliament.

“However, there is a de facto recognition of the Rodríguez acting government being built,” he went on to add. “This will become de jure sooner or later; it could be a few months or even a couple of years.”

Venezuela’s inability to sustain debt service, including settlements with creditors, as a result of sanctions, saw many corporations pursue legal avenues to collect. Crystallex, ConocoPhillips and several other companies are set to benefit from the proceeds of the forced judicial auction of Venezuela’s US-based refiner CITGO.

Washington’s formal recognition of the Rodríguez acting administration could also pave the way for Venezuela to access about $4.9 billion in “special drawing rights” issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF created the liquidity instruments in 2021 to help governments deal with the Covid-19 pandemic but blocked Venezuela from accessing its share as it followed Trump’s lead in not recognizing the Nicolás Maduro government.

According to reports, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently held meetings with the heads of the IMF and the World Bank to discuss a possible re-engagement with the South American country.

For their part, Venezuelan authorities have expressed a willingness to engage with creditors in the past, but US sanctions preempted any meaningful engagement.

Caracas’ debt also includes long-term oil-for-loan agreements with China. However, with Washington’s naval blockade recently blocking China-bound crude shipments, Beijing has reportedly sought assurances of the repayment of debts estimated at $10-20 billion.

The post Venezuela: Creditors Hunger for 170B Debt Renegotiation appeared first on Venezuelanalysis.


From Venezuelanalysis via This RSS Feed.

285
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Truth, justice, and reparation

Starting Monday, the Mexican government will begin implementing measures to provide reparations to the victims and families affected by the Interoceanic Train derailment. The Interoceanic Corridor accepted the recommendation of the Federal Attorney General’s Office (FGR), and alternative legal possibilities will be offered, with direct attention in the communities, without bureaucratic procedures, and with differentiated amounts of compensation.

Justice that repairs

President Claudia Sheinbaum stated that justice is not only punishment; it is truth, investigation, and non-repetition. The FGR is investigating who was responsible for the train accident, while the government guarantees comprehensive reparations that go beyond financial compensation. The train line will resume operations only after all required certifications are met, including international certification.

Electoral reform with a popular mandate: presenting what the people demanded

The President said that the electoral reform will be presented with the core elements demanded by the public, as expressed in the forums that were organized. Sheinbaum clarified that even if some individuals or political parties disagree, that will not prevent the proposal from being presented.

She emphasized that no one should oppose the demands of the people, but a debate will take place in the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.

Credit and digital payments: coordination with the central bank and business leaders

The Mexican government held meetings with the Banco de México to move forward on more accessible credit for small and medium-sized businesses and greater digitization of payments, an agenda that will be strengthened throughout the year. There are already joint working groups with the Ministry of Finance.

Mexico exports more and strengthens its economy

By the end of 2025, Mexico reached a record level of exports. Although the automotive industry’s exports posted a slight decline, sectors such as electronics grew significantly. The President noted that the trade balance improved, as the country exports more than it imports, strengthening the national economy.


The post People’s Mañanera January 28 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

286
 
 

This article by Jim Cason and David Brooks originally appeared in the January 28, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Washington and New York. President Donald Trump promoted on his social media a new book that warns of an “invisible coup” against the United States orchestrated by the Mexican government and Morena party, which are “using mass migration as a political weapon to influence elections and undermine national security.”

Trump says a multitude of things every day on his social media and so far he has not repeated his invitation to his millions of followers to buy the book The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon, by Peter Schweizer, but his endorsement has already helped it reach number 8 on Amazon’s best-selling non-fiction books list.

The book by the right-winger, a partner of former political strategist and influential commentator in conservative circles Stephen Bannon – in fact, he was on his show War Room yesterday, which has more than a million followers – could fuel the anti-immigrant narrative, particularly against Mexicans and the Mexican government.

Schweizer, whose previous book about Hillary Clinton made the New York Times bestseller list, is promoting his work on conservative national media programs where he repeats his conspiracy theory that the Mexican government and elites in the United States are using immigrants in this country as a secret weapon to change the demographics and thereby transform American society and politics.

“Mexico has 53 consulates in the United States, while the United Kingdom and China have six and seven, respectively. As I argue in the book, consular officials are busy supporting political activities (in the U.S.), trying to influence the presidential elections,” Schweizer commented on CBS News’ Takeout interview program with Major Garrett. “I think it’s inappropriate for the Mexican government and its diplomats to be involved in this type of political activity within the United States.”

In his book, the author suggests that Mexican politicians openly discuss “reconquering” the United States. As an example, he writes that “in February 2023, José Gerardo Rodolfo Fernández Noroña, a member of the Mexican Congress from the ruling Morena party of President Claudia Sheinbaum, calmly stated on the floor of the Congress of the Union that California, Texas, and New Mexico were, among other territories, ‘occupied territories.’” He adds that Noroña later stated that Mexico “should evaluate this dispossession and once again demand the recovery of these territories” from the United States. “These outlandish statements certainly did not harm his career. In fact, they helped it. A year and a half later, he was elected president of the Mexican Senate.”

Schweitzer acknowledges that many in the Mexican political elite use this type of rhetoric and are probably not calling for the return of those territories, but rather “the cultural and political detachment of the American Southwest from the United States and its transformation to resemble Mexican civilization.” In his arguments, he cites statements by Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the immigrant congressman Aniceto Polanco, and “Morena Party activists living in the United States,” though he also includes older statements by Ernesto Zedillo, all of whom, he alleges, have expressed how Mexican immigrants can and should bring about change in the United States.

Schweizer argues that former President López Obrador visited U.S. cities in February 2017 to rally Mexican immigrants to oppose the anti-immigrant policies promoted by Trump, claiming that these policies had a negative impact on the profits of cartels that, in turn, supported López Obrador.

Regarding Sheinbaum, the author notes that she has supported the song The Migrant Anthem, and even played it at a press conference. “And although my birth certificate says American, I am pure Mexican,” the song says, according to Schweizer. “We changed places but not flags/I have green, white, and red in my veins.”

“Mexico is using migration as a weapon to undermine U.S. sovereignty,” Fox News reported in its review of the book. “These consular officials have been busy organizing political activity in the United States, which is a clear violation of their diplomatic credentials,” Schweizer told the conservative national news network. He added that the consulates distribute Mexican textbooks to U.S. schools with a large Latino population, where the U.S. is portrayed as Mexico’s “enemy.” “The question is: why are we tolerating this? I think it’s time to say ‘enough is enough.’” He added, “We need a zero-tolerance policy. We’re getting ready for the midterm elections, and based on history, this shouldn’t be tolerated.”

Schweizer, a right-wing activist, makes it clear that his main concern is that Mexican officials and politicians are supporting Democrats and other opponents of Trump.

Under U.S. law, it is illegal for any foreign government or individual to make contributions to political candidates in this country at any level. However, all citizens, including Mexican Americans, have the right to participate in the political process in this country, but if they are promoting or representing the interests of another nation, they must register with the government as such.

Everything indicates, although it was not explained, that the publication of this book was the reason why the Mexican embassy in Washington issued a statement assuring that its consular network in this country maintains strict political neutrality and focuses exclusively on consular assistance and administrative functions.

The post Mexico Conspires to Invade US, says Book Promoted by Trump appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

287
 
 

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun reiterated that Beijing supports Venezuela in defending its sovereignty, dignity, and legitimate rights within the framework of the current political situation facing the Bolivarian nation.

Jiakun denounced the US military actions carried out on January 3 against the Venezuelan state, which included the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, as hegemonic behavior. According to the spokesperson, these acts gravely violate international law and threaten the country’s territorial integrity.

In that regard, he noted that Beijing is willing to work with the international community to firmly uphold the UN Charter and adhere to the principles of global ethics in order to safeguard fairness and justice.

China and Russia Reaffirm Commitment to Cuba

Support for CubaThe Asian nation also addressed the possible tightening of the US embargo against Cuba. In this regard, it affirmed that China will continue to provide support to the island “within its capabilities.”

Finally, Beijing rejected the embargo imposed by the White House, accusing Washington of depriving the Cuban people of their “right to survival and development.”

(Últimas Noticias) by Karla Patiño

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

288
 
 

By Elías Jaua Milano – Jan 26, 2026

In these notes today, I want to express clearly what I sincerely believe, with no other interest than this: that at the end of this ordeal, Venezuela remains an independent nation. It is our duty. This is what I believe:

  1. Comrade Delcy Rodríguez is not part of a plan to surrender Venezuela’s oil or its economic sovereignty in general. I recognize her as a patriotic woman, leading the country through the most serious circumstances the Republic has faced from 1830 to the present day.

  2. We are a nation coerced by the government of a foreign military power that recognizes no principles of peaceful coexistence among nations. This reality conditions the actions of both the government and society as a whole, and no one in Venezuela has the power to act otherwise. Even when disagreements with current policies arise, I believe they must be expressed responsibly and without disparagement.

  3. Those in leadership must acknowledge that the extreme struggle of recent years—which has left dead and wounded—has also inflicted political, moral, and psychological wounds, even within Chavismo itself. Calling for national unity requires understanding these wounds, not dismissing them, and making necessary corrections to rebuild relationships and alliances. Only then can we move forward, amid diverse positions and challenges, toward the higher goal of preserving the Republic.

  4. From the left, we must recognize the widespread weariness with conflict. Society is demanding respite; it urgently needs to regain control over its economic and social life. We must be careful not to perceive a distorted reality. We need to understand the sentiments of the national majority and guide how to achieve the aspiration to live well without sacrificing national dignity.

  5. The political sector now led by Ms. Machado, which since 2002 has promoted, instigated, and now celebrates foreign military intervention, remains the primary threat to Venezuela’s independence and peace. Building a broad, pluralistic, democratic, and popular national front to contain them politically and electorally is the great task of those of us who deeply love our country.

Delcy Rodríguez: Venezuela’s Diplomacy Will Resolve Differences With US

From the left, we must discard illusions, overcome pain and prejudice, and acquire the theoretical and methodological tools that should underpin our political action. The dialectic of reality, historical determinations, social being and social consciousness, objective and subjective conditions, democratic hegemony, and the correlation of forces—among others—are valid categories today for understanding concrete reality and advancing the construction of a new patriotic, democratic, and popular majority. Such a majority will put a stop to colonial ambitions and restore to the people of Venezuela their right to live well, in peace, and with dignity. Venezuela comes first!

(Ciudad Valencia)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

289
 
 

Relatives of two Trinidadian citizens killed in a US missile strike in the Caribbean have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Trump administration. This litigation, the first of its kind, seeks justice for the brutality of the unauthorized military campaign that, under the pretext of a “war on drugs,” has claimed more than 120 lives in the Pacific and the Caribbean since last September.

The lawsuit asserts that Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo, two workers who earned their living in fishing and agriculture in Venezuela, were returning to their home in Trinidad and Tobago on October 14, 2025, when a US missile struck their vessel.

“If the US government believed Rishi had done something wrong, they should have arrested, charged, and detained him, not killed him,” said Sallycar Korasingh, Samaroo’s sister.

According to the lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Boston, the victims were civilians, not drug traffickers, and were the victims of a “manifestly illegal” operation. Baher Azmy, an attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights, bluntly described it as: “These are cold-blooded, unlawful murders; murders for sport and murders for show.”

The Trump administration, through its Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has attempted to cloak these attacks in the guise of the “law of armed conflict,” claiming they target “armed groups.” However, legal experts and human rights organizations have refuted this narrative: drug cartels do not constitute, under international law, an armed group as defined by the law of war. Even more seriously, the US Congress never authorized this campaign of targeted killings in international waters, placing it in a legal and moral limbo.

Is Canada Aiding the US in Those Boat Attacks?

In this regard, the lawsuit is based on two US laws: the Death on the High Seas Act and the Foreign Tort Statute of 1789. However, the case goes beyond the families’ pursuit of compensation. The Boston court will have to decide whether it considers the doctrine applied by Trump to be legal—whereby Washington acts as judge, jury, and executioner in any corner of the globe, trampling on the sovereignty of nations like Venezuela, in whose territorial waters the attack occurred, and disregarding the right to life of citizens of countries in the Global South.

To date, the attacks on vessels, which began in September 2025, have resulted in the deaths of more than 120 people, in incidents described by various experts as extrajudicial killings by the United States. The most recent attack occurred on January 24, resulting in two deaths and one crew member injured.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JB/SH


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

290
 
 

In episode 93 of Soberanía, hosts José Luis Granados Ceja and Kurt Hackbarth return from a major anti-imperialist conference in Colombia to analyze its outcomes and the urgent challenges facing Latin America.

They share their impressions from the “Nuestra América” summit in Bogotá, discussing the push for regional unity, the importance of the upcoming Colombian elections, and the need to turn solidarity into concrete action. Back on the home front, the hosts examine mounting pressures on Mexican sovereignty, from the contentious suspension of an oil shipment to Cuba to disputed narratives around a high-profile arrest. Amidst these diplomatic storms, they also highlight a positive domestic story: the government’s progress on delivering affordable public housing.

As always, José Luis and Kurt provide sharp, on-the-ground analysis of the political forces shaping Mexico and the region, wrapping up with a critical look at a new conspiracy theory targeting Mexico’s consular network in the U.S.


The post Latin America Unites – Soberanía 93 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

291
 
 

This article by Alonso Urrutia and Alma E. Muñoz originally appeared in the January 28, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Mexico City. Expanding on the topic of oil shipments to Cuba, Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum clarified that humanitarian aid to the island continues. “Mexico has always shown solidarity with the world; these are sovereign decisions. The issue of the (oil purchase) contract with Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex) is determined by that contract, specifying when the shipment will take place.”

Will the shipment of oil as humanitarian aid continue?

“We have to determine that based on the request,” Sheinbaum responded.

When asked directly why the oil shipment was suspended when Cuba needs it most, Sheinbaum said that this allowed her to clarify her position, specifying that the shipment is made through two channels: through a Pemex contract with a Cuban government institution and through humanitarian aid.

“Humanitarian aid is a sovereign decision, and Pemex, under contract, determines when to send it. I never said whether it had been suspended or not; that was an interpretation,” she responded during his press conference, referring to a report that had surfaced.

The post PEMEX Cancels Cuban Oil Shipment, Humanitarian Aid Might Continue appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

292
 
 

This editorial by José Romero originally appeared in the January 27, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. The views expressed in this article are the authors’* own and do not necessarily reflect those ofMexico Solidarity Mediaor theMexico Solidarity Project.*

In recent weeks, the Mexican government has begun making decisions that can no longer be presented as mere technical adjustments to trade policy. The imposition of tariffs on countries “with which Mexico does not have a trade agreement” unequivocally points to China and constitutes a clear political signal: Mexico has chosen to align itself in advance with the United States’ trade and geopolitical strategy leading up to the review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in 2026.

The United States is not seeking to break the treaty. It seeks something more effective: to strengthen it. Donald Trump’s second term has made it clear that pressure will no longer be exerted primarily through general tariffs, but rather through non-tariff barriers. Labour standards, environmental requirements, traceability rules, technical certifications, and national security clauses have become permanent instruments for conditioning access to the U.S. market without formally violating the agreement. This is a sophisticated, selective, and politically defensible form of protectionism.

In this framework, the labor chapter of the USMCA occupies a central place. Far from operating as an exceptional mechanism for defending rights, it has been transformed into a tool for direct intervention in specific plants, with the capacity for near-automatic sanctions and sectoral effects. This is not a technical detail: it is a form of production control that allows for the disciplining of entire supply chains without altering the text of the treaty.

Mexico has begun adapting to this logic even before formal negotiations. By preemptively closing its tariff policy toward Asia, the country is effectively accepting to operate as the United States’ advanced economic frontier. This is not merely a trade decision, but a progressive surrender of regulatory sovereignty. Domestic economic policy is beginning to align with standards defined outside the country, reducing its future room for maneuver.

The official narrative attempts to justify this shift with a sectoral argument: the automotive sector will contract, while the electronics sector will expand. This assertion contains elements of truth, but it is being used misleadingly. It is true that electronics manufacturing has shown recent dynamism, driven by exports and production relocation. But this growth does not equate to a structural transformation, nor does it guarantee greater national added value. In many cases, it reproduces the same pattern: assembly, high dependence on imported inputs, and an almost exclusive focus on the export market.

Without an explicit industrial policy, the supposed transition from automobiles to electronics does not represent a qualitative leap, but rather a simple change of specialty within the same dependent model. Added to this is a central constraint that is rarely mentioned: the USMCA severely limits the use of public procurement, domestic content, and state purchasing power as levers for development. The result is an integrated country, but one with the state hamstrung in its efforts to support its own producers.

The energy sector confirms this asymmetry. Mexico has already faced panels and pressure in this area, and any future attempt to strengthen domestic regulations will be interpreted as a non-tariff barrier. Experience shows that the United States can indeed impose sectoral sanctions; Mexico lacks the capacity for symmetrical retaliation. The relationship is not one of equals, but rather hierarchical.

In this context, it’s important to stop speaking in abstract terms. Marcelo Ebrard is not only in charge of the USMCA. He has become, de facto, Mexico’s economic czar. Strategic trade decisions, the relationship with the United States, regulatory adaptation, and the narrative of certainty now all pass through the Ministry of Economy. The Ministry of Finance manages macroeconomic stability; the Ministry of Economy defines the course. And that course has a perfectly identifiable political figure responsible.

This implies a direct historical responsibility. What Mexico concedes, anticipates, or accepts regarding rules of origin, regulatory standards, energy, labor, and non-tariff barriers will not be the result of external misfortune, but rather of concrete actions. The USMCA has ceased to be an instrument and has become a strategic substitute, and this substitution has an author.

Mexico is moving toward a de facto semi-customs union, but without the fiscal or political benefits of a formal union, and with a growing loss of commercial and industrial autonomy. The 2026 review will not be a technical debate, but a major political decision. The question is not whether the treaty holds or falls apart, but what national project exists beyond it.

If that project doesn’t materialize, the country will continue to conform to external rules, confusing alignment with development and external discipline with growth. And when the consequences are assessed, it will be inevitable to point the finger at the economic leadership that chose this path.

The post The USMCA & Economic Control appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

293
 
 

US intelligence reports suggest Washington may be unable to fully control Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

294
 
 

The kidnapping of President Maduro by the US marks the culmination of a long imperialist campaign, rooted in the Monroe Doctrine and justified by fabricated legal pretexts.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

295
 
 

By William Serafino – Jan 23, 2026

A few days ago, a viral video was posted on the White House TikTok account which showed President Donald Trump walking and making his typical unpleasant gestures while the screen becomes saturated—until it is completely covered—with reports of gasoline prices at less than US $3/gallon in several states and cities across the US.

The post, tailored to the Republican president’s narcissism, was accompanied by the globally renowned song “Gasolina” by Daddy Yankee, a musical icon of Latin culture who symbolizes reggaeton’s resounding global impact in the first decade of this century. Hence, the inevitable success of this post on social media.

The goal of stabilizing gasoline prices below US $3 has been intensely pursued by Trump since his return to the White House in 2024. It was one of his most important campaign promises, making that price ceiling a general barometer of the US public’s assessment of the economic performance of his second term.

Unable to control the inflation curve as he would like, curb the rise in health insurance costs, or contain a string of electoral victories for the Democratic Party—driven by pressure on the cost of living for the average US citizen—Trump is waging that lowered fuel prices can overcome the arduous challenge of the November midterms.

Disapproval of the Republican’s economic management continues to rise, dangerously reaching 50% in public opinion polls, foreshadowing what could be an electoral cataclysm.

The anxiety to project economic strength led the White House last October to celebrate as a resounding success the drop in the average price of gasoline to US $2.98 a gallon. A few cents makes all the difference for a government that is prioritizing power, both domestically and internationally, over its ability to manage risk and control consequences.

Dilemmas, decisions, costs
In terms of energy, the US is a colossus that emerged a few years ago with the peculiar condition of producing less than it needs to function internally.

The world’s largest producer and largest consumer of crude oil coexist in a single country, creating a strategic imbalance between the country’s (new) export role and its dependence on external supplies for its refineries. This imbalance has created a paradox where there is no middle ground between losers and winners.

Higher global crude oil prices mean greater incentive for the productive capacities of the fracking industry, but at the same time, they imply higher costs for crude oil imports that are passed on to the final value of gasoline.

On the other hand, US oil is mostly light and is not compatible with refineries designed to process heavy crude like that from Venezuela, Mexico, Canada, and West Asian countries.

In the hydrocarbon sector, the premise that abundance is synonymous with self-sufficiency does not hold true in the United States. Trump has linked the military attack against Venezuela on Jan. 3 to the broader objective of reducing the price of gasoline and crude oil in general, directing his post-bombing coercive advantage to bolster the Venezuela’s oil production with large flows of US investment, to the benefit of US energy requirements.

Many energy firms and experts doubt that Venezuelan oil, whose production is not expected to increase significantly in the short term, will have a decisive impact on gasoline prices. Fuel costs have already been decreasing since November, currently standing at 20% below last year’s prices, a trend that has not been altered by the military intervention.

However, more barrels produced from the Venezuelan’s oil fields, which would feed the refineries on the Gulf Coast of Mexico, thirsty for Venezuelan heavy crude after years of suffocating sanctions from the US government, is undoubtedly an incentive for Trump’s goal of keeping global oil prices around US $50 a barrel.

From Texas, part of the Permian Basin responsible for half of the crude oil produced in the US (about 6 million barrels per day), oil operators have highlighted concerns that a reduction in profits will prevent them from covering costs, sustaining jobs, and expanding drilling activity, with the danger of structurally affecting the economy of the southern state.

Steering-wheel turn
With a break-even point of between 62-70% to operate, a barrel at US $50 condemns the fracking industry to reduced production in order to optimize capital. “Dale mas gasolina” (“give me more gasoline”) has tactically replaced “Drill, baby, drill,” the slogan of the drilling expansion campaign that Trump promised to carry out in order to increase US oil production.

On the other hand, increased Venezuelan oil production does not solve the bottleneck on the strategic West Coast, where approximately 30% of US oil demand is concentrated.

The geological challenge of the Rocky Mountains has prevented the region from fully integrating into the Permian Basin oil boom, reinforcing its dependence on imported crude oil.

The West Coast, ironically, has become an isolated and dependent enclave within a country that produces more than 13 million barrels of oil per day. In states such as California, gasoline prices have not fallen enough for Trump to claim a national economic victory. There, prices continue to resist dropping to the level the Republican desires.

Trump’s short-term calculation looks risky, as it strains relations with his oligarchic donors in the energy sector and depresses the growth prospects of the Permian Basin, which already shows signs of exhaustion and slowdown solid enough to speak of a decline on the horizon of US energy dominance.

Acting President Delcy Rodríguez: ‘Let the Empire Know, Venezuela’s Energy Relations Will Continue to Grow’

The armed assault on Venezuela starkly reveals the violent way in which an energy giant with feet of clay exports the irresolvable contradictions that lie within its borders. In an attempt to alleviate the structural pressure exerted on its domestic economy and politics, the strategy of colonizing the sovereign resources of other countries has reappeared as a temporary emergency measure.

The political consequences of “dale mas gasolina” are also complex, since Trump has invested a good part of the potential return of his only economic achievement in a stable Venezuela governed by Chavismo, a bitter pill that the neoconservative architects of regime change, with Marco Rubio at the helm, will hardly accept as an irreversible reality.

(Diario Red)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

296
 
 

It landed in the town of Ushuaia, whose port is of vital importance to the economy, the defense of Argentine sovereignty and access to the Antarctic continent.

This Sunday, the Malvinas Argentinas International Airport in Ushuaia witnessed an unusual event when a US Air Force Boeing C-40 Clipper landed in the capital of Tierra del Fuego at 11:22 AM, arriving from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland.

The aircraft, which made previous stops in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Buenos Aires, generated considerable uncertainty, as local sources reported that there was no prior communication from the Argentine National Government or defense agencies authorizing its arrival.

The government of Gustavo Melella, who leads the province of Tierra del Fuego, was unaware of the aircraft’s arrival and lacked the authority to allow or deny the landing, leading to confusion and questions about the lack of control over provincial airspace. The reason for the landing and the identities of the aircraft’s occupants are currently unknown.

The situation became even more intriguing with the itinerary of two other private planes that departed from San Fernando for Ushuaia. Their destination and purpose remain a mystery, raising concerns about possible secret or unknown agreements between the Argentine government and the United States to hand over control of the strategic port of Ushuaia, a key point for tourism and access to Antarctica.

🇦🇷🇺🇸 | Un avión de la Fuerza Aérea de Estados Unidos aterrizó este domingo en Ushuaia, horas después de que el Gobierno nacional interviniera el puerto. La aeronave partió desde Maryland y realizó escalas en San Juan y Aeroparque. pic.twitter.com/TguEjJq8nx

— Mundo en Conflicto 🌎 (@MundoEConflicto) January 25, 2026

This port, vital to both the local economy and the defense of Argentine sovereignty, has historically been a site of high interest in the geopolitical context of the Antarctic continent.

Adding to this episode is the recent intervention of the Milei administration in Ushuaia’s port infrastructure. The National Ports and Navigation Agency (ANPyN) decided to take control of port management for 12 months due to alleged financial irregularities and infrastructure problems.

The measure, formalized through Resolution 4/2026, states that the province used port resources to finance social programs, violating a previously signed agreement stipulating that these funds must be reinvested exclusively in port activities.

Aterrizó sin aviso un avión de la FUERZA ÁEREA de Estados Unidos en Ushuaia, dos días después de que Milei interviniera el Puerto Ushuaria. Nadie del gobierno informa nada. Ni para qué aterrizó un avión militar extranjero ni por qué intervinieron el Puerto pic.twitter.com/p92Pf8DiUa

— Arrepentidos de Milei (@ArrepentidosLLA) January 26, 2026

The governor of Tierra del Fuego, Gustavo Melella, expressed his rejection of the intervention, calling the measure unjustified and unfounded. Through his social media account, Melella emphasized that the province was working to resolve the problems and defended the region’s autonomy.

He also insisted that the local government was in contact with the Minister of the Interior, Diego Santilli, to find a solution that would guarantee the port’s normal operation.

Argentina: Map Reveals 32.1 Million Acres in Foreign Hands

In addition to the intervention in the port’s management, the resolution also orders the suspension of the port’s operating license for one year. However, the implementation of this sanction has been postponed to avoid disrupting the 2025-2026 cruise season or affecting the region’s supply chain.

The immediate intervention will be limited to the machinery, facilities and the management of funds, which keeps various sectors linked to the port and maritime trade in the area on alert.

(teleSUR)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

297
 
 

President Xi defends his country against U.S. accusations and stresses multilateralism

Xi stressed that amid a “turbulent” international environment, China and Brazil, as leading members of the Global South, should act as “constructive” forces to safeguard international peace and stability and contribute to reforming and improving the global governance system.

Xi stressed that amid a “turbulent” international environment, China and Brazil, as leading members of the Global South, should act as “constructive” forces to safeguard international peace and stability and contribute to reforming and improving the global governance system.

Xi rejected accusations against Beijing and said the alleged “China threat” is “completely unfounded.” He criticized “baseless accusations” and the practice of “fabricating pretexts” to “seek selfish gains,” an indirect reference to statements by U.S. President Donald Trump about China’s expansion in the Arctic region and Greenland.

Countries With the Most Natural Resources:

1.🇷🇺Russia $75.0 Trillion
2.🇺🇸United States $45.0 Trillion
3.🇸🇦Saudi Arabia $34.4 Trillion
4.🇨🇦Canada $33.2 Trillion
5.🇮🇷 Iran $27.3 Trillion
6.🇨🇳China $23.0 Trillion
7. 🇧🇷Brazil $21.8 Trillion
8.🇦🇺Australia $19.9 Trillion
👇 pic.twitter.com/Ar0fHol3bx

— The Index Insider (@TheIndexInsider) January 19, 2026

Xi also defended the need to protect the shared interests of developing countries and to preserve the central role of the United Nations, urging efforts to “defend international fairness and justice.”

Regarding China-Brazil relations, Xi recalled that in 2024 both countries elevated their ties to the level of a “community with a shared future,” aimed at promoting “a fairer world and a more sustainable planet.” He said cooperation between Beijing and Brazil has since advanced in a “solid and pragmatic” manner.

Xi added that the launch of China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030) opens new opportunities to deepen economic, trade and technological cooperation, and he expressed China’s willingness to expand “comprehensive and mutually beneficial” collaboration.

For his part, Lula said Xi’s visit to Brazil in 2024 provided a decisive boost to bilateral relations and that cooperation across various fields has seen “significant progress.”

The Brazilian president also underscored the role of China and Brazil as defenders of multilateralism and free trade. He called for greater coordination to “strengthen the authority of the United Nations,” deepen cooperation within the BRICS group and contribute to regional and global stability.

The Xi-Lula conversation comes at a time of rising tensions, after Trump announced at the World Economic Forum in Davos a preliminary agreement with NATO regarding Greenland and defended a shift in Washington’s foreign policy that has raised concerns among emerging economies.

📍 From #China the professor at Minzu University of Journalism and also a commentator on the #CGTN channel, affirms that what the #usa🇺🇸 has done against Venezuela and its president #nicolasmaduro has been a total violation of international rights and clearly a kidnapping pic.twitter.com/RVEN79ZMNm

— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) January 22, 2026

(Telesur)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

298
 
 

By Kit Klarenberg – Jan 24, 2026

HTS was groomed for years prior to its violent palace coup by Inter-Mediate, an MI6-linked consulting firm run by Jonathan Powell, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s national security advisor.

Since January 13, the newly reconstituted Syrian Arab Army has torn across North East Syria. It marks a brutal end to an autonomous region – typically referred to as Rojava – effectively governed by the US-backed, Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces for over a decade. While a Washington-brokered ceasefire agreement provides for the SDF’s integration into Damascus’ Western-appointed government, the de facto HTS-controlled SAA shows every sign of seeking to permanently erase and neutralize every trace of Rojava.

Civilians and SDF fighters have been slaughtered since the region’s takeover. The SAA has been assisted in this massacre by former inmates of local detention centres, among them a profusion of former ISIS butchers. These facilities were created in 2019 to accommodate the population of the territory once claimed by the Islamic State and today house tens of thousands of people. Markedly, government forces specifically targeted the prisons when their assault on Rojava commenced, strongly suggesting igniting mass jailbreaks locally was a deliberate objective.

Rojava’s ISIS refugee camps posed a complex and seemingly irresolvable problem for the autonomous territory. Inhabitants could only be repatriated with the consent of their home country’s government, which in many cases refused. The al-Hol camp proved particularly problematic. Housing exclusively women and children, many detainees were the wives, sons, and daughters of Islamic State fighters. The former, in some cases, never renounced their commitment to ISIS, while the latter are stateless.

September 2019 Washington Post report painted a horrifying picture of al-Hol as a “cauldron of radicalization,” in which hardcore ISIS adherents enforced the group’s strictures upon the wider population through brutal violence, including murder. SDF guards could do nothing but attempt to “contain” offenders physically, while the Islamic State’s extremist ideology spread “uncontested”, with tens of thousands of children a literally “captive audience”. The facility was struck by the SAA on January 20, sending clusters of its captives and the SDF fleeing.

Al-Hol is now under government control, and the fate of its approximately 30,000 inhabitants remains uncertain. However, there are grounds to believe the camp’s population has been primed in advance to expect, and welcome, the arrival of Ahmed al-Sharaa’s forces. Leaked documents reviewed by Al Mayadeen Englishexpose how The Global Strategy Network, a psychological warfare specialist founded and staffed by British intelligence veterans, has maintained a secret presence in al-Hol for years, covertly perpetuating British government-approved propaganda messaging every step of the way.

The putative Syrian government’s destruction of Rojava significantly consolidates its hold on power nationally. The SDF occupied territory home to the country’s primary oil- and wheat-producing areas, seizure of which provides a sizeable windfall. There is moreover zero prospect of a breakaway Kurdish state emerging, which the territory’s leaders had repeatedly mooted following HTS’ December 2024 capture of Damascus. These developments will be warmly greeted throughout Western corridors of power – first and foremost, perhaps, London.

As this journalist has previously exposed, HTS was groomed for years prior to its violent palace coup by Inter-Mediate, an MI6-linked consulting firm run by Jonathan Powell, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s national security advisor. Inter-Mediate has maintained a dedicated office within Syria’s Presidential Palace ever since. Starmer cheered Bashar Assad’s fall as an opportunity for London to “play a more present and consistent role throughout the region.” That plan is now being put into action.

‘Moderate version’
The leaked files show that Global Strategy began constructing a psychological warfare infrastructure within al-Hol almost immediately upon its founding, in the wake of the Islamic State’s formal March 2019 defeat. Contrary to mainstream reports that the SDF had comprehensively crushed ISIS, the documents note the group continued to conduct “operations” against “military and intelligence assets” in Rojava. This meant “Daesh remains a clear and present danger” locally, “continuing to deploy acts of violence against an ever-expanding list of adversaries.”

There were other issues making Global Strategy’s mission difficult and deeply dangerous. As “Daesh proactively involved women in both its civilian administration and military operations,” this meant the Islamic State was “able to wield significant influence in al-Hol, in spite of its wider loss of formal territorial control, by using the ‘true believers’…to proselytise and enforce on its behalf.” The “spectrum” of residents spanning “active Daesh supporters” to those “actively victimised by Daesh” was also said to be “highly complex and unclear.”

Moreover, ISIS bombarded detainees with propaganda, while exploiting al-Hol “as a critical element of its wider communications,” supporting “proactive and aggressive outreach around the issue.” Some Daesh-distributed imagery juxtaposed “poor living conditions” in the camp “with nostalgic recollections of the ‘golden age’ of the Daesh proto-state.” ISIS leaders also frequently made public statements about al-Hol, calling the camp’s existence “the worst and most important matter” while urging their supporters “to free [the] sisters and tear down the walls restricting them.”

Despite this, Global Strategy boasted of its ability to maintain a “full-time team presence” in al-Hol and beam relentless propaganda to inmates via the infrastructure of Wa estern-funded local radio station ARTA. The intelligence cutout pledged to create a trio of “media centres” throughout the camp, combining “communications and community-based activities,” which would serve as “gathering spaces”. There, detainees could cook food, drink tea, and socialize, as their children enjoyed a dedicated play area, and varied Global Strategy-concocted programming was broadcast all day.

This included a “morning show…a multi-segment programme focusing on the camp’s problems and concerns and the work of aid agencies and civil society organisations in the camp, with entertainment breaks and useful community information.” In the afternoons, “a lighter socio-cultural and entertainment programme focusing on local popular culture, as well as useful community information, with entertainment breaks (quizzes, song dedications, horoscopes, etc.)” was transmitted. “Religious” shows were a regular staple too.

These broadcasts “focused on different questions in Islam and its relation to society,” promoting “a moderate version of Islam” and challenging “extremist ideas and practices, during which moderate local religious figures will be hosted as guests.” Children were considered key targets, with educational programmes providing “accessible and engaging classes in literacy, sciences, literature and history, mixed with entertainment breaks and games.” Vast sums were surreptitiously sunk into this project by British intelligence, without any public oversight or cognisance whatsoever.

How CIA and MI6 Created ISIS

‘HTS domination’
The stated goal of Global Strategy’s clandestine operation in al-Hol was deradicalization. To call the effort a failure would be an understatement. From the camp’s creation until the present day, regular media and think tank reports warned al-Hol was a key nucleus for the “resurgence” of ISIS. An April 2025 Frankfurt Peace Institute investigation referred to young boys housed at the camp as a “human reservoir” for the Islamic State’s “Cubs of the Caliphate” program, via which they were trained in the art of killing.

This begs the obvious question of whether Global Strategy’s objective was truly to counter extremism. The firm’s psychological warfare initiatives have a disquieting tendency to not only actively assist ISIS, but also produce the precise opposite effect of that formally intended. For years, Global Strategy managed wide-ranging efforts to “undermine” HTS in the areas of Syria it dominated. However, in leaked documents, the firm acknowledged these initiatives were actively assistingHTS’ “growing influence” in Syria.

Resultantly, many Syrians regarded HTS as “synonymous with opposition to Assad.” It is surely no coincidence that in September 2025, former-MI6 chief Richard Moore admitted his agency had courted HTS for years prior to its seizure of Damascus. This clandestine bond was struck despite British intelligence being under no illusions that mainstream accounts of the group’s split from al-Qaeda were fantasy. A leaked 2020 Foreign Office file noted “HTS domination” actively provided “space for [al-Qaeda]-aligned groups and individuals to exist” in the country.

This peaceful coexistence reportedly provided “space” for al-Qaeda to “maintain an instability fuelled safe haven…from which they are able to train and prepare for future expansion” outside Syria. This begs the obvious question of whether Global Strategy’s actual aim in al-Hol was to convert detainees to the ‘right’ kind of militancy, from the perspective of British intelligence. The cutout’s unparalleled reach into the camp could easily have been exploited to prepare inmates for the day al-Sharaa’s forces liberated them.

Either way, Syria’s al-Qaeda-affiliated government has now been granted a vast “human reservoir” of grateful former inmates, who could be called upon to assist in brutal crackdowns on internal dissent, massacres of Alawites and other ethnic and religious minorities, and more widely shoring up an ideal Anglo-American puppet state locally. It is not for nothing that Damascus was granted a greenlight to capture Rojava at US-mediated talks with “Israel” in Paris in early January, where al-Sharaa signed a locally despised accord with the Zionist entity.

(Al Mayadeen – English)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

299
 
 

By Devin B. Martinez  –  January 25, 2026

The killing of Alex Pretti by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on January 24 came less than 24 hours after a historic general strike against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and federal forces in Minnesota. More than 100,000 people marched through the streets of Minneapolis, as thousands of businesses shut down. Such an expression of working-class power has not been seen in the US for over 80 years.

The strike marked a major development in the struggle between federal immigration enforcement and organized resistance in Minnesota.

The city, already demonstrating its ability to mobilize at a scale that can disrupt the economy, woke up the following morning to yet another killing of a community member by a federal agent.

Criminalizing the victim
“We are heartbroken but also very angry,” said the family of Alex Pretti, in a public statement released on January 24.

A CBP agent shot 37-year-old Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse at the Veterans Affairs hospital, about 12 times in south Minneapolis, after several agents were seen wrestling him on the ground and pistol whipping him.

As with the killing of Renee Good earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) moved quickly to establish its narrative. It issued a statement saying that Pretti had approached CBP agents with a gun. When they tried to disarm him he “violently resisted” and “an agent fired defensive shots”.

Pretti’s family denounced the “sickening lies told about our son by the administration” and directly challenged the administration’s attempt to criminalize Pretti posthumously.

“Alex is clearly not holding a gun when attacked by Trump’s murdering and cowardly ICE thugs.” They urged people to help them get the truth out about Pretti. “Alex wanted to make a difference in this world … his last thought and act was to protect a woman.”

“He was a good man.”

Video footage debunks government narrative
Recordings from the scene of the incident seem to corroborate the family’s claims against the government’s narrative. In Pretti’s killing, video shows him at the scene recording with his phone camera. Within seconds of Pretti trying to assist a woman that had been assaulted by federal agents, Pretti was pepper-sprayed, tackled by multiple agents, and shot to death. Evidence suggests he posed no lethal threat.

Pretti was a lawful gun owner with a permit to carry, and video evidence shows that his weapon never left its holster until a CBP agent removed it, moments before he was shot dead. The federal government has nevertheless used the presence of the gun as retroactive justification for his killing. The narrative itself exposes contradictions between “law and order” rhetoric and legal gun ownership, neither of which seem to provide protection from the use of lethal force by federal agents.

Video documentation also captured moments that underscored the culture of impunity surrounding the operation. One CBP agent can be seen clapping during the shooting. Another shouted “boo hoo” at community members demanding the agents leave the area (an act seemingly intended to intimidate rather than disperse the crowd).

That moment of deadly state violence did not happen in a vacuum. It came on the heels of a massive general strike in Minnesota that confronted the ICE occupation directly. Thousands of businesses shut down, hundreds of community organizations supported it, dozens of unions participated, and students forced the University of Minnesota to completely close.

Over 100,000 workers, students, business owners, and community members flooded the streets of downtown Minneapolis in temperatures below -30°C demanding ICE out of the state.

However, Minnesota’s general strike was met not with dialogue, but escalation.

Repression and resistance
The response by the authorities after Pretti’s killing highlights how seriously they view the capacity for mobilization and resistance in the Twin Cities and the broader state.

Peoples Dispatch was at the site of the killing, as federal agents used tear gas, flash bangs, and pepper balls to clear the crowd of hundreds of community members gathering at Nicollet Ave and 26th street.

Later, protestors blocked the road with dumpsters, mattresses, and garbage cans. The cycle of confrontation continued throughout the day but by the evening, thousands of Twin Cities residents filled the area.

Governor Tim Walz authorized the deployment of the national guard. Witnesses reported armored vehicles and military-style perimeters of the area. The extraordinary show of force was rained down on a city that has proven its capacity to mobilize hundreds of thousands in coordinated action.

Despite reported phone calls with US President Trump and colorful language against ICE in press conferences, Governor Walz and Mayor Frey have yet to order the arrest of Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent identified as Renee Good’s killer weeks ago. Nor have they announced any action in the killing of Alex Pretti.

The strike reverberates
Minneapolis appears to be emerging as a testing ground for how far the federal government can advance Trump’s far-right agenda. Amid mass resistance, the government has expanded the authority of federal forces, normalized lethal force, and relied on delay and silence from local officials to absorb public outrage.

The general strike demonstrated that Minneapolis residents are willing to organize at a scale rarely seen in the United States. The killing of Alex Pretti the following morning revealed the lengths to which federal authorities are willing to go to reassert control.

On the ground, protestors are already calling for an expansion of the general strike. As cities like NY, Boston, Los Angeles, Washington DC, and many others broke out in spontaneous protests after Pretti’s killing, one chant echoed across them all: “Strike! Strike! Strike!”

Whether the city becomes a model for resistance or a major victory for the Trump administration may depend on how long the ICE violence is allowed to continue without consequence.

(People’s Dispatch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

300
 
 

This article by Eliana Gilet originally appeared in the January 26, 2026 edition of Desinformémonos.

With less than 140 days until the opening match of the 2026 World Cup in Mexico City, construction has taken over the city. All the spaces deemed “necessary” for the event are undergoing a cosmetic transformation, far removed from the needs of the majority of the population and, in particular, neglecting the long-standing urgent needs of the metro system. Faced with projects implemented without consultation and secret agreements between FIFA and the Mexican government, organized residents are demanding their right to “live with dignity in a city that welcomes and protects the people who have cared for it for decades.”

The area most affected by the intervention is the vicinity of Azteca Stadium. Vendors who had their stalls in front of the stadium bus stop were completely removed before the start of the year. Residents of the Acción Pedregales Cooperative—which, along with various organizations from the indigenous communities of Mexico City, San Lorenzo Huipulco, and Santa Úrsula Coapa, as well as Xochimilco and Milpa Alta, has consistently denounced the negative effects of the World Cup in Mexico—told Desinformémonos that when they resumed their actions under the overpass on January 4, the vendors were no longer there.

Furthermore, the construction of the bike path on Tlalpan Avenue, which links the Historic Center with the Stadium—covering 17 kilometers of the city, making it the main and most visible urban modification— has added to the protest the demands of various groups of sex workers from the Calzada.

“It’s the biggest project they’ve ever undertaken, and with so little planning. You can see how they make mistakes and correct them along the way. For example, when they first built the bike path, they realized there was no possibility of a bus stop at the stadium and had to redesign everything. So they removed the large planters because people had to stand on them to get onto the bike path. Since they’re constantly working on mistakes, we have even more uncertainty about what’s happening and what they’re going to do,” explained Natalia Lara in an interview with Desinformémonos during the assembly at the underpass on January 18.

“It’s been a dispute over public space in recent weeks, as the entire Santa Úrsula Coapa area is impassable,” Lara said. Rubén Ramírez, a traditional authority from the town of Santa Úrsula, emphasizes another key aspect of these projects: the lack of public consultation. “The construction being carried out around the Azteca Stadium is causing traffic and environmental chaos—in other words, general chaos—because there was no consultation. We, the people who live here, are the ones who know which areas are most affected and who are living with the consequences every day, but the authorities don’t care,” he asserted.

Contrary to this extractivism, the area surrounding the stadium has been developing into a meeting place where urban struggles against dispossession and the over-tourism of Mexico City are woven together. “Many comrades arrive every week, and their solidarity is the tool that allows us to continue, to keep going, and to see that results are emerging,” Natalia stated.

Assembly in the underpass of the Azteca Stadium

World Cup is just a Pretext

On Sunday the 18th, amidst the dust from the new construction at the stadium bus stop and trucks from the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) claiming to be “laying cables for hospitals”—though neighbors suspect they were actually calibrating a new transformer recently installed on one of the stadium’s corners for the event—they had to negotiate the space. The first argument was early, to avoid leaving as the construction workers demanded; then, after 11 a.m., to ask them to temporarily stop making noise where the assembly was taking place.

That morning, vendors from other underpasses arrived: the pedestrian walkways of Tlalpan who have been living under the threat of eviction for six months. “The government’s priority is the World Cup, but the consequences are serious, because it leaves many people without jobs. They try to make the avenue look really cool, but they don’t leave anything good behind. We approached the neighbors today to ask for their support, to ask for their help, because this isn’t right,” explained Mr. Ricardo Gutiérrez, who has been cutting hair for twenty years in one of the shops at the Tlalpan and Santiago pedestrian crossing.

Merchants under the Santiago bridge in Tlalpan resist their eviction, which is being justified by the World Cup. Photo: Eliana Gilet

The news reached them through Servimet, the metropolitan services office headed by Carlos Mackinlay, the former Mexico City tourism secretary, whom they directly accuse of trying to intimidate them into signing over their spaces. “He was very rude. In the meetings he held, because we are senior citizens, he treated us as if we were no longer capable of reasoning. He told us he would pay us 16,000 pesos for the space we have, in 16 monthly installments of 1,000 pesos! And with that, he would become the owner of the pedestrian walkways. It’s a ridiculous amount. Doesn’t he have any idea how expensive life is these days? There are people there with jobs,” the hairdresser complained.

There is indeed a whole world beneath Tlalpan Avenue in these pedestrian underpasses. Don Gutiérrez describes a situation similar to that experienced by the residents near the stadium: they took care of the area without the authorities paying them any attention, until the eviction notice arrived. “We’ve been a no-man’s land, but we took care of the place. We installed a submersible pump, electricity, and paint. We were the ones who provided services to the pedestrian underpasses so they would have lighting and people could pass through, interact with the businesses, and give us work. But when we suggest any ideas to the central government or the Benito Juárez borough, they don’t do anything. They’ll never do anything we need,” he complained.

The other members of Santiago 22 told Desinformémonos that only the pedestrian crossings in the Benito Juárez borough are still fighting, because those located in the Cuauhtémoc borough have already signed in favor of Servimet.

José Alberto Íñiguez, 65, who has worked as a tailor since he was 14, offers an important perspective on how the World Cup pressure affects local conflicts: “The World Cup is just a pretext, nothing more. They say the Koreans and Argentinians are going to be here… of course not! If they want to improve the uneven terrain, they can work at night, but the eviction is unfair,” he told Desinformémonos in an interview.

Since that Sunday, they have joined the neighborhood resistance that has been brewing under the Azteca bridge: “It’s unfair because we’re not taking advantage of this place, we’re simply surviving. But we’re not going to leave, we’re going to defend what our way of life means, nothing more,” said Don Alberto.

Benito Juárez Airport work Photo: Eliana Gilet

According to information provided to the press, the Mexico City government allocated 6 billion pesos (approximately 350 million dollars) for the “beautification” of Mexico City. This is the only fully known figure for how much public investment the World Cup has required for “its” venues. After the Azteca Stadium, the subway system has been the most heavily renovated, but far from addressing complaints about serious and obvious problems (the most recent, for example, on Line 4), public funds have flowed in other directions, such as the renovation of the Taxqueña bus terminal and the Auditorio station on Line 7, which has its entrance on Reforma Avenue, near the World Cup clock. Mexico City International Airport has also undergone extensive renovations to “improve” its everyday appearance.

The first light rail stations, those closest to Taxqueña, have also been closed for several months, forcing people to waste time accepting free bus rides to the first open station, Ciudad Jardín. “There are conflicts, internalized and normalized violence that we Chilangos (Mexico City residents) are already used to. What we have seen are complaints about the fare increase, because we see that all this infrastructure is being built to change public transportation, but they raise the fare, and FIFA isn’t going to pay anything,” Natalia pointed out.

According to journalistic work by Cuban reporter Penyley Ramírez, Mexico negotiated a complete tax exemption for FIFA during Enrique Peña Nieto’s presidency (unlike the agreements reached by Canada and the United States) and a substantial commitment of public investment to meet the needs of the private event. However, all official bodies have denied providing or even knowing about these agreements in response to public information requests submitted by the Acción Pedregales Cooperative.

“Last year, we requested the collaboration agreement with BBVA for financing the infrastructure projects through transparency laws, but the head of government responded that the agreement did not exist. Then we requested the general collaboration agreement from every agency we could think of, but each institution responded that they were not competent to provide it, and that is curious,” Lara noted.

While the World Cup and FIFA reaped abundant public investment for their private business, local residents complain that the environmental damage will remain on this side of the city once the tourists leave. They point out that flights will multiply in the city to facilitate connectivity between venues and host countries (10 percent more than the current 1,200 flights per day, according to Mayor Clara Brugada) in a highly polluted area like the Valley of Mexico. Around the stadium, construction dust has already caused respiratory problems for residents.

“We’re paying for all this infrastructure that’s being built, because FIFA isn’t going to pay a single penny to put on their show here. We’re the ones who always end up paying for this problem, because this isn’t the first World Cup we’ve experienced. We had the 1970 and 1986 World Cups here, and the local population, the indigenous communities of Santa Úrsula Coapa and San Lorenzo Huipulco, and the surrounding neighborhoods, never received any benefit. We’re still dealing with traffic chaos, environmental problems, and security issues, and now these events are going to add to that. They’re going to leave us with a mess,” Rubén declared.

The post Mexico City Public Works for 2026 World Cup Contradicts Needs of the Majority appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›