Latin American Publications!

120 readers
8 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
251
 
 

By Pavan Kulkarni  –  Mar 13, 2026

Withdrawing from the case, the complainant and the key witness named in the chargesheet has accused the police of fabricating charges and weaponizing the criminal justice system.

The chargesheet against Booker Omole, the general secretary of the Communist Party Marxist – Kenya (CPM-K), began to unravel in the very first pre-trial hearing on March 9. Abducted on February 24 without a warrant by men in plainclothes, tortured in custody, and imprisoned, Omole was released on bail on March 3.

​At his pre-trial hearing on Monday, the complainant and the main witness named by the police in the chargesheet submitted an affidavit in the court, saying that he was “unequivocally” withdrawing his “complaint and all statements recorded” pertaining to the case.

​Stating that “these proceedings are a weaponization of the criminal justice system aimed at … harassing and intimidating” Omole, he added that the police had fabricated the charges.​

“It is clear that the complainant was forced into this by the police,” Omole told Peoples Dispatch. “The Registrar of Firearms Bureau also presented a report to confirm that I am a legally registered owner of the firearm,” he was accused of possessing illegally.

Surviving an assassination attemptIt was the same firearm he had used to survive an assassination attempt last year during the Gen Z protests between June and July, sparked by police brutality amid a worsening cost-of-living crisis under the austerity regime instituted by President William Ruto.​

“Many activists suspected of being involved in the protests were being abducted without warrants and tortured,” Omole recalled. “Six gunmen broke into my house. I shot one dead at my bedroom door.”

​After a gun fight, “one more was found dead outside on the road, probably from a bullet wound. Others who fled were arrested, but the judicial enquiry never concluded.” The case went dark “because they were intelligence officers,” he maintains.

**​“It was an ambush.”**​“But I did not have this gun with me in the car when I was stopped” on February 24 at a roadblock set up at the bypass to turn to Nairobi on his way back from Isiolo, where he was travelling with a party comrade and a foreign delegate for political work and to raise funds.​

“It was an ambush. Some 20 men, without uniforms, surrounded our car and started to grab us. We did not know who they were. So we resisted and fought back,” he recalled. It was only when the public gathered, demanding to know who the men were, that they identified themselves as police.

​“The accusation that I threatened to kill them during this scuffle is ridiculous. There were 20 of them – armed – how could I have threatened to kill them?”​

They took all three into custody, along with their two cars, and drove them to the apartment the party had rented to host its international delegates. The police named the owner of this apartment, Andrew Amoth, as the main complainant and witness in the chargesheet.

​A chargesheet riddled with contradictions​The police maintain they swung into action after Amoth allegedly made a noise complaint against the guests who had rented his apartment. “But his apartment is in Nairobi. I was abducted on my way from Isiolo. How could I be making noise in Isiolo and Nairobi at the same time? When the police write a cooked story,” Omole remarked, “such contradictions appear.”

​Upon their arrival at the apartment, the police allege that Omole drew his gun on the landlord. But Omole maintains he was already detained and brought there in police custody. “At no point did … Omole point a firearm at me,” the landlord insisted in his affidavit.

​Upon raiding the apartment, the police found 320,000 Kenyan shillings, equivalent to about USD 2,500, which they insisted was a fund to sponsor an insurgency against the government. They then drove Omole to the Mlolongo police station, where, according to Amoth’s affidavit, they tried to extort this amount from Omole.

​**“A well-known criminal within the police”**

​The Officer Commanding Station (OCS) at Mlolongo is Peter Mugambi, whom Omole described as “a well-known criminal within the police. He is also a sworn anti-communist, Evangelical Christian.” Omole had already had a run-in with him back when he was the OCS of Bamburi. At the time, “he had accused me of organizing a terrorist cell to overthrow the government.”

​Now under his wing again at the Mlolongo police station, the police tortured Omole, dislocating his arm, already injured in the scuffle during his abduction. “They even strangled me”, demanding to know who was financing him for leading the protest outside the US embassy against the abduction of Venezuela’s president, Nicholas Maduro.

​“They insisted I must also be a member of a drug cartel,” like Maduro, echoing the allegation the US had concocted before his abduction. Just as this allegation was dropped by the US prosecution when Maduro was produced in a court, the Kenyan police also dropped this from the chargesheet.

They instead claimed to have found narcotics in the apartment. “Contrary to what is stated in the Charge Sheet, I confirm that no narcotics, drugs, or illegal substances were found in the apartment,” its owner and complainant said in his affidavit. “As the lawful owner and occupant of the premises, I find any suggestion to the contrary to be false and did not originate from any evidence recovered from my home.”

The chargesheet was made available to Omole only when he was produced in the Mavoko Law Court in Machakos on February 26, well past the 24 hours since detention as mandated by law. His injured arm was crudely bandaged as he was rushed into the courtroom by more than half a dozen policemen who kept out all his comrades and journalists. Denied bail on the technical grounds that the police had not provided the pre-trial document to the court, Omole was sent to Kitengela Remand Prison.

Communist Party Marxist-Kenya Leader Booker Omole Released on Bail, Others Arrested

**​“A prison within a prison where they send you to break your spirit”**​On the night he was brought to this prison, he was held in isolation, in what he estimates to be a 2-by-1 meter cell, where his tall and athletic frame could barely move about. “There is no toilet,” added Omole. “You are given a bucket to defecate in. It is a prison within a prison where they send you to break your spirit.”​

The following day, he was transferred to the “capital remand prison”, in a uniform, scrawled with the red letters “SW”, standing for Special Watch, assigned to those deemed dangerous. His inmates here were charged or convicted with the death penalty, carrying crimes like murder, robbery with violence, etc.​

Booker Omole in prison

Booker Omole in prison. Photo: CPM-K

“We were about 400” held on a floor consisting of what he estimates to be an 8 by 20 meters hall, with rows of 3 by 4 meter cells on either side – 27 prisoners packed in each. Several human rights reports have also documented the overcrowding in Kenyan prisons, requiring inmates to sleep on their sides, facing the same direction to fit in, “packed close to one another like sardines.”

“If a privileged prisoner who could pay the police was brought in, a cell would be emptied for him,” which would further overcrowd other cells, added Omole. “So inmates spend most of their time in the hall.”​

Holding political education sessions for prisoners and wardens
Sitting on the lid over a dustbin in this hall, shuffling between books, Omole can be seen in a video snuck out of prison lecturing the inmates gathered around him about the commonalities between the guerrilla warfare led by Mao in China and the Mau Mau uprising led by Dedan Kimati in Kenya.​

“We had three such sessions at night,” he recalled, observing that the prisoners were readily receptive “to our ideas”. All of them were poor and strongly insisted that it was their instincts to survive poverty that got them into crime.​

“None of them had any regrets for their crimes,” he said, adding that they only swore that if given a second chance, they would not get caught. “This goes to show that the idea of prison as a place to reform criminals and rehabilitate them back into society is a myth.”​

Wealthy criminals, rarely imprisoned, have a relatively comfortable living space and are not crammed in like the rest. They get to “take walks and have a smoke.” Prison authorities, bribed, allow them wholesome meals brought in from outside. The rest, who cannot pay, have to make do with “some soup and corn bread,” perceptible in their bony frames seen in the video. The prisoners were therefore acutely aware of the class contradictions, Omole said.​

This, he said, was “already a firm basis to start the discussion about the capitalist system.” The inmates did not need much explanation to grasp why Kimati, who fought for land, remained criminalized as a terrorist for the most part since independence by the “neo-colonial state”, while the representatives of the wealthier classes were hailed as the heroes of Kenya’s freedom struggle.​

Outside of this floor where the violent criminals were held, there was also the so-called “prison school”, where inmates gather for sort of group therapy sessions, recollecting “what got them into prison” and reiterating “why they must change. I exploited that platform to deliver an agitational lecture.”

Prison wardens live like prisoners themselves
The junior prison wardens took an interest, initially out of simple curiosity about a political prisoner. As it grew, “I also held a session with them,” Omole said. “They needed a public figure to engage with their issues.” Their condition was little better than the prisoners themselves. Their homes were essentially four walls and a roof made of iron sheets, emanating a chilling cold in winters and blistering heat in summers.

​”There are seven gates” between the rows of jails, with two junior prison wardens placed as guards between each. “They are also locked in. They don’t have the keys. If there is a fire outbreak, they can’t escape either. They have to die with the rest of the prisoners. These work conditions,” Omole explained, naturally gravitated them toward the left-wing ideas he was espousing. “We became good friends. They helped us smuggle in political literature.”​

But the political literature was later discovered by the higher authorities. “I was handed another 8 hours in the isolation cell.”

​In the meantime, the police finally provided the court with the pre-bail hearing document, whereupon he was granted bail on March 3 for an amount of 500,000 Kenyan shillings, more than the 320,000 the police had allegedly tried to extort from him.

​The judge also ordered the police to return all the possessions they had seized from Omole and his co-accused. It included “two cars, an iPhone, a laptop, and the 320,000 Kenyan shillings” they found in the apartment. When Omole went with his lawyer to collect them, he said that Mugambi let loose his police to expel him from the station, leading to a scuffle.

​Chargesheet unravels​On March 9, the court issued another order to return them. At the pre-trial hearing that day, Amoth, the complainant and main witness, submitted an affidavit to withdraw from the case, while the Registrar of Firearms also confirmed his gun was legally owned.

​The Department of Public Prosecution then sought leave to amend the chargesheet, to change the accusation of illegal possession of a firearm to misuse of a firearm. However, Amoth said in his affidavit, “At the time the police arrived, the firearm was secured in a safe in the upper bedroom, and the magazine was separated from it.”

So the charge of misusing a firearm will not hold either, Omole said, adding the chargesheet will likely be dropped as “defective and untenable. If that happens, we will file a case for wrongful detention and prosecution, and demand compensation.”

While confident that the case against him will fall apart, Omole is certain that the “crackdown against our party will only intensify as we grow in strength. The task we face today is to build a revolutionary organization, capable of fighting back.”

(Peoples Dispatch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

252
 
 

By Ben Norton  –  Mar 8, 2026

The US and Israel bombed 20 schools and 13 hospitals in Iran in one week. War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of unleashing “death and destruction” to provoke societal collapse, with “no stupid rules of engagement”.

The United States and Israel are intentionally devastating civilian areas in Iran, brutally bombing schools, hospitals, and residential neighborhoods, in an attempt not only to destroy the state but also to collapse Iranian society itself.

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth described the scorched-earth strategy in a Pentagon press briefing on March 4.

“This was never meant to be a fair fight, and it is not a fair fight. We are punching them while they’re down, which is exactly how it should be”, Hegseth boasted.

He added with pride that the US and Israel are raining upon Iran “death and destruction from the sky, all day long”.

Hegseth noted that, in the first four days of the war on Iran (named Operation Epic Fury), the US military employed “twice the air power” that it had used in the “shock and awe” invasion of Iraq in 2003.

In another press briefing on March 2, the US secretary of war condemned international organizations like the United Nations and proclaimed, “America, regardless of what so-called international institutions say, is unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history”.

Hegseth bragged that the US is fighting with “no stupid rules of engagement”. By his admission, the Pentagon is purposefully targeting civilian areas, and does not care about the rules of war.

US and Israel bomb 20 schools and 13 hospitals in Iran in one weekAccording to the World Health Organization, the US and Israel bombed at least 13 hospitals and health facilities in Iran in the first five days of the war, which Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu launched on February 28.

Washington and Tel Aviv bombed at least 20 Iranian schools in the first week of the war, according to UNICEF.

They also destroyed a desalination plant, depriving dozens of Iranian villages of water.

The US and Israel killed more than 1,300 Iranians in the first week. Children made up 30% of the victims.

CNN and the New York Times both independently confirmed that the US military bombed an elementary school in the city of Minab in southern Iran on the first day of the war.

The US bombed the school twice, 40 minutes apart, to make sure there were no survivors.

The US military killed at least 168 children and 14 teachers.

War Secretary Hegseth published a map of the areas in Iran that were bombed by the US, and the Minab primary school was clearly in the strike zone.

Who Threatens the Arab World: Iran or the US and Israel?

This is what Hegseth meant when he bragged that the US empire is “punching them while they’re down”, with “no stupid rules of engagement”.

The US-Israeli slaughter is so extreme that even some right-wing media outlets in the West, like the UK’s conservative newspaper The Telegraph, were forced to admit that “Tehran [is] an ‘apocalypse’ of hospitals in flames and children buried beneath rubble”, as the US and Israel intentionally bomb civilian areas.

US and Israel want a failed state and societal collapse in IranWhat Washington and Tel Aviv want to unleash in Iran is not just regime change; it is the destruction of the state and the collapse of Iranian society.

This was openly admitted by some Israeli officials, in a report in the Financial Times.

The FT cited Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, who declared that “every leader appointed by the Iranian terror regime . . . will be an unequivocal target for elimination”.

Tel Aviv’s plan is to kill all Iranian leaders, so the country cannot be governed and simply falls into chaos.

This was further confirmed by a former top Israeli intelligence official.

The Financial Times interviewed Danny Citrinowicz, who worked for 25 years in Israel Defense Intelligence (IDI) and was the chief of the Research and Analysis Division’s Iran branch.

Citrinowicz told the FT that what Israel wants is the “total destruction of this regime, of the pillars of this regime, of everything that holds it together”.

The former head of Israeli military intelligence’s Iran analysis said this is how Tel Aviv sees the war (emphasis added):

If we can have a coup, great. If we can have people on the streets, great. If we can have a civil war, great. Israel couldn’t care less about the future . . . [or] the stability of Iran.

In other words, the US and Israel want to repeat in Iran the same kind of war of extermination that they carried out in Gaza, which a UN commission determined to be a campaign of genocide.

US-Israeli war on Iran blatantly violates international lawIt goes without saying that the US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran flagrantly violates international law.

The United Nations education agency, UNESCO, emphasized that the bombing of Iranian schools by the US and Israel “constitutes a grave violation of the protection afforded to schools under international humanitarian law”.

Legal experts have clearly stated that the US-Israeli war violates international law. They also noted that Washington was engaged in supposed “negotiations” with Tehran, and Iran was willing to make significant concessions for a deal, when Trump launched this surprise war of aggression, sabotaging the talks.

Stanford University’s elite law school published an interview with an expert on international law, Professor Allen Weiner, who stated, “From an international law perspective, my judgment is that the attack was quite clearly illegal”.

States do have a right to self-defense under international law, Weiner noted. Iran has exercised this right.

The US and Israeli regimes claimed they launched “preemptive” attacks on Iran, but Weiner stressed that this is not valid under international law.

In order to claim self-defense, states may only strike when they have evidence that “they face an imminent threat of attack”, he argued.

This does not apply in this situation, Weiner emphasized. The Stanford law professor explained:

The notion that Iran presents a general security threat to U.S. interests does not constitute a threat of imminent attack. Nor does the possibility that Iran might at some point in the future acquire either nuclear weapons or intercontinental missiles capable of reaching the U.S. homeland amount to a threat of an imminent attack.

US-Israeli war on Iran is based on liesAll of the talking points that the Trump administration has used to try to justify this illegal war have fallen apart.

The Pentagon admitted in a closed-door briefing to Congress that Iran was not going to attack the US and Israel first, and that it only had plans to retaliate in self-defense.

Similarly, the Trump administration claimed that Iran was close to developing nuclear weapons. This was false as well.

The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, said clearly in an interview on CNN that Iran was not on the verge of having nuclear weapons.

This was another lie promoted by the US government to justify an illegal war.

“Were the Iranians days or weeks away from building a [nuclear] bomb, from having a bomb?”, CNN host Becky Anderson asked Grossi.

“No”, he replied, bluntly.

The IAEA chief explained, “We never had information indicating that there was a structured, systematic [Iranian] program to build, to construct, a nuclear weapon”.

(Geopolitical Economy Report)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

253
 
 

Drone attacks in Sudan launched by both sides of the conflict – the Sudanese army and the RSF – have killed 200 civilians so far this month

Iran’s retaliatory strikes on Israel and the UAE are contributing to a quick collapse of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a UAE-backed paramilitary group fighting in Sudan’s civil war, The Canary reported on 13 March.

With weapons and funding from the UAE and Israel, the RSF has been fighting the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) since April 2023 in a war that has killed tens of thousands and forced 11 million people to flee their homes.

But the UAE and Israel are seeing their supply lines to the RSF disrupted amid Iranian missile and drone strikes since the start of the US-Israeli war on the Islamic Republic, starting on 28 February.

Iranian attacks have closed the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off the UAE’s shipping and oil export routes, and causing severe economic losses.

According to The Canary, the RSF had been making strong gains until February; “However, Sudanese government forces have achieved a string of military victories that appear to be turning into a rout.”

The Sudanese army is successfully targeting RSF arms and supply depots, and cutting off frontline RSF troops from the ammunition, fuel, and supplies needed to fight.

In the context, the Sudanese army announced on Thursday it had captured two areas in the Blue Nile region – the southeastern province that has seen heavy fighting since January.

The 4th Infantry Division, the army’s primary command in the region, said in a statement that its troops and allied forces “cleared” Jort East and the Ballamo Camp following battles against the RSF and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) led by Joseph Touka.

Military officials stated the operation was part of a broader campaign to secure strategic locations in the southern sector.

The Sudanese army’s advance has come amid an escalation in drone attacks targeting civilians by both sides in the conflict.

UN rights chief Volker Turk stated on Thursday he was “appalled” at reports that drone attacks had killed more than 200 civilians in Sudan since 4 March.

Turk said Sudanese army drone strikes in West Kordofan had killed at least 152 civilians. Among them were at least 50 who were killed when a drone targeted a market and a hospital on 4 March in the town of Muglad.

On 7 March, Sudanese army drone attacks on two separate markets in RSF-controlled Abu Zabad and Wad Banda left at least 40 civilians dead.

Israel Views Sudan Conflict Through the Lens of Red Sea Strategy

Another Sudanese army drone targeted a truck carrying civilians in Al-Sunut on 10 March, reportedly killing at least 50 civilians, Volker added.

Meanwhile, the White Nile region has come under heavy attack by RSF drones since 4 March.

Volker also said that an RSF drone targeted a secondary school and a health clinic in Shukeiri village on 11 March, killing at least 17 civilians.

Fighting has also escalated in South Sudan, as a 2018 power-sharing deal between the current President of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, and his long-time rival, the detained South Sudanese former vice president Riek Machar, has been unravelling in the past year.

South Sudanese government forces announced on Thursday the recapture of the opposition-held town of Akobo following a major military offensive.

“Akobo is safe, the surrounding areas are safe,” says General Lul Ruai Koang, a spokesperson for the South Sudan People’s Defense Forces (SSPDF).

Before the offensive, the army had issued an evacuation order for civilians, causing some 200,000 people to flee to neighboring Ethiopia as a result.

Akobo was one of the last remaining strongholds of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-in-Opposition (SPLM-IO) – the armed movement loyal to Riek Machar.

South Sudan gained independence in 2011 but soon descended into civil war and remains mired in extreme poverty and corruption.

(The Cradle)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

254
 
 

Havana says contacts with Washington have been ‘respectful.’

On Friday, President Miguel Diaz-Canel confirmed that Cuban officials have held talks with representatives of the United States government.

“First and foremost, the purpose of this conversation is to identify bilateral problems that require solutions, based on their severity and impact,” he said.

Diaz-Canel also mentioned that the talks aim to determine both sides’ willingness to take concrete actions for the benefit of the people of both countries, identify areas of cooperation to address threats, and guarantee the security and peace of both nations and of Latin America and the Caribbean.

“This is part of a very sensitive process, conducted with seriousness and responsibility, because it affects bilateral relations between both nations and demands enormous and significant efforts to find solutions and create spaces for understanding that will allow us to move away from confrontation,” the Cuban president specified.

The contacts were promoted by Diaz-Canel himself and by Raul Castro with the aim of addressing bilateral differences through dialogue.

The Cuban president said the exchanges have taken place in a “respectful” atmosphere, focused on identifying problems between the two countries and seeking solutions that benefit their peoples.

Cuban Electricity System Reconnected After Failure, Amid US Blockade

For months, media reports had pointed to the existence of discreet contacts between Washington and Havana amid the current situation facing the island due to the U.S. energy blockade. Until now, however, Cuban authorities had not officially confirmed those contacts.

The official acknowledgment of these conversations comes just one day after the Cuban government announced the early release of 51 imprisoned individuals, a measure Havana presented as the result of an agreement with the Vatican and as a gesture of “good will” within the framework of relations with the Holy See.

The Cuban Foreign Ministry said the inmates will be released in the coming days and that all have served a significant portion of their sentences and maintained good behavior in prison. However, the Cuban government did not publish the names of those who will benefit from the measure.

In the past, similar prisoner releases have been linked to diplomatic negotiations with the United States. This was the case, for example, with the mediation carried out by the Vatican in 2014 to facilitate a rapprochement between the governments of Barack Obama and Raul Castro.

Diaz-Canel stressed that any negotiation process must be conducted on the basis of recognizing equality among states, respect for the self-determination of peoples, and the pursuit of friendly relations between the parties.

(Telesur)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

255
 
 

This article originally appeared in the March 10, 2026 edition of Proceso.

The Zapotec community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag, an indigenous town nestled in the Sierra Norte of Oaxaca, which became a national and international point of reference when they denounced the sports company Adidas Mexico for cultural appropriation for presenting the “Huarache Oaxaca Slip-On” model, by designer Willy Chavarría, without their authorization, has maintained a process of recovery and protection of its cultural wealth since 2023.

The struggle of this community is not only focused on the controversy of a unique model or prototype of huarache called “Huarache Oaxaca Slip-On”, whose design bears similarities to the traditional huaraches of the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag, Oaxaca, but it goes back to the recovery of their official Zapotec name that they had lost in 1877.

Over the years, Villa Hidalgo Yalálag has also compiled a catalog of its niches, chapels, hermitages and churches that are part of the community, as confirmed by the municipal authorities of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag and their legal advisor Juan Maldonado Vargas.

In addition, they reported that the Municipal Register of Pets, cats and dogs, has been created to maintain control for public health purposes.

Maldonado Vargas states that the objective is for the community to have a catalog with its elements of Cultural, Natural, Material and Intangible Heritage, such as its dances, music, traditions, gastronomy, clothing, crafts and of course its natural spaces.

The sports company Adidas has joined these community projects for the protection of the cultural wealth of Yalálag and although no one has confirmed the version, it is known that in the main access of the community past its church of San Antonio de Padua, construction work is being carried out on what appears to be a sports complex.

It is worth remembering that on August 2, 2025, at the San Juan Museum of Art in Puerto Rico, during a musical concert, a unique model or prototype of huarache called “Huarache Oaxaca Slip-On” was presented, whose design bears similarities to the traditional huaraches of the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag, Oaxaca, made in a handcrafted way, by the different families that dedicate themselves to the production, from a Yalalateco, to entire families that clean, tan and prepare the hides.

The Huarache Oaxaca Slip-On: Adidas appropriated the cultural creations & traditions of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag.

The Huarache was created by designer Willy Chavarría in collaboration with the sports company Adidas México S. A de CV, who were in charge of launching and producing the Huarache according to the presentations released in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The municipal authority, residents, and huarache artisans of the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag were made aware of the situation, which necessitated holding various meetings involving the huarache artisans and community advisors, particularly Juan Maldonado Vargas, a descendant of Yalalteco who fulfills his role of assisting the community with various problems, in order to present a position regarding cultural appropriation or misappropriation.

The reactions from the Government of the State of Oaxaca were not long in coming. On August 4, 2025, Governor Salomón Jara Cruz and the head of the Oaxaca Ministry of Culture and Arts, Flavio Sosa Villavicencio, as well as the Oaxaca Congress, publicly declared their position regarding the cultural appropriation of the huarache by designer Willy Chavarría and Adidas, “Huarache Oaxaca Slip-On,” which bears a strong resemblance to the huaraches made in the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag using traditional and ancestral methods.

Similarly, the federal government, through the head of the Ministry of Culture, Claudia Curiel de Icaza, and the Undersecretary of Cultural Development, Marina Núñez Bespalova, as well as the National Institute of Indigenous Peoples, made statements regarding what they considered the possible cultural appropriation of the identity elements that fully identify the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag in the presence of the President of the Republic, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo.

Meanwhile, in the Sierra Juárez of Oaxaca, in an act of strengthening identity, the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag, in a community assembly, after a detailed review of all its elements, issued a statement asking for “respect and recognition of indigenous cultural intellectual property and intangible cultural heritage, respect for the ancestral knowledge and wisdom of the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag.”

In the statement that was disseminated in the different media, they demanded a dialogue table for the recognition of the ancestral knowledge and wisdom of the production of the artisanal huarache of Yalálag with the production of the Adidas Huarache “Oaxaca Slip On”, to which they agreed.

Days later, representatives from Adidas Mexico and the community of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag issued a public apology, a document that was read in both Spanish and Yalálag Zapotec, in which the Adidas representatives humbly expressed their recognition of the ancestral knowledge and wisdom of the Yalálag community.

The public apology highlighted: “At Adidas, we deeply value the cultural richness of the Indigenous Peoples of Mexico, with the aim of engaging in direct dialogue on the points raised in your letter and exploring, together with your Authority, the steps that will allow us to move towards reparation for the damage done to the Zapotec Community of Yalálag.”

“Today, in front of the Yalalteca community, on behalf of Adidas Mexico, we offer our most sincere recognition and respect for the cultural richness of the indigenous communities of Mexico, with the profound symbolic and traditional meaning of their valuable artisanal legacy, present in the cultural representations and traditional techniques that we witness here.”

They acknowledged that the “Oaxaca Slip-On” model was conceived taking inspiration from a design originating in the State of Oaxaca, typical of the tradition of the town of Villa Hidalgo Yalálag.

The Mexican state, through its federal, state, and municipal levels of government, has been in violation of international norms and conventions since 1972, and in 2003, by failing to generate the records, inventories, registers, or catalogs for the protection of the Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples and Communities, and above all, their protection. As a result, businessmen or companies, due to the economic power they represent, appropriate the ancestral elements that identify the Indigenous communities.

This is how, up to this point, it is known unofficially that the damage repair agreement continues to strengthen between the Villa Hidalgo Yalálag Community and Adidas Mexico.

The legal advisor of the Yalálag community confirmed that, for the past three years, they have been working on a process of recovering and protecting their cultural heritage.

He emphasized that on March 18, 2023, by decree of the Oaxaca Congress, Yalálag recovered its official name. In 1877, it had been known as Villa Hidalgo, as Decree 35 had discontinued the use of the town name San Juan Bautista Yalálag. Officially, its name remained Villa Hidalgo, even though the community’s identity is Yalálag. Therefore, the municipal authority and the citizens’ assembly, through a name recovery process, requested the legislative branch to officially recognize Villa Hidalgo Yalálag, as this is the name that reflects the identity of the indigenous community.

The post Zapotec Community in Oaxaca Strengthens Defense of its Cultural Heritage After Dispute with Adidas Over Appropriation appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

256
 
 

As the World Trade Organization (WTO) prepares for its 14th Ministerial Conference in Yaoundé, Cameroon, this March, we must confront the troubling reality of its impact on global trade. Created to facilitate free trade, the WTO has only intensified poverty and inequality worldwide. Its policies have undermined sovereign autonomy, particularly in the Global South , while marginalizing peasant and rural communities in the Global North. The relentless promotion of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) has led to widespread privatization and deregulation, primarily benefiting corporations at the expense of the working class everywhere.

Currently, the WTO is in a quagmire, unable to reach a consensus on critical issues such as public storage and dispute settlement, and is often powerless against hegemonic powers that use trade as a weapon to advance their geopolitical agendas.

La Vía Campesina reiterates that any debate on WTO reform is fundamentally flawed. Founded to promote the interests of a select group of wealthy nations, it maintains its power structures and functions as an inherently unequal space, lacking a genuine commitment to collective prosperity or the defense of peasant rights.

We stand firm in our demand that agricultural and food policies be removed from WTO negotiations. Instead, these vital debates should take place in more legitimate multilateral institutions, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) , where the voices of social movements and civil society can influence decisions that affect our collective future.

The WTO must disappear. It’s time to mobilize for a real alternative!

We need to build a global trade framework for food and agriculture based on the principles of food sovereignty . In Cameroon and beyond, La Via Campesina, along with other social movements, will continue to mobilize against the WTO and promote our concrete proposals for an alternative.

We call upon all our members and allies to organize mobilizations, press conferences, and public meetings in their towns, cities, and national capitals between March 26 and 29, 2026 , to express their opposition to free trade agreements that violate our rights and to reiterate our demand to keep agricultural trade negotiations outside the WTO.

We invite people from all over the world to wear something green—be it a hat, a t-shirt, a scarf, or a bandana—and take a photo with a sign that reads #EndWTO . Posting these images on social media will amplify our message and create a visual map of solidarity that can be pinned to a central online panel, illustrating the growing “bandwagon effect” as more groups from diverse locations join in.

The post La Via Campesina Issues Global Call Against WTO & Free Trade Agreements appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

257
 
 

This editorial by Raúl Romero originally appeared in the March 14, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

It is a common and deliberate misconception to think that drug trafficking and organized crime are the same thing; and that, due to their “illegal” nature, both drug trafficking and organized crime are anomalies that the system combats to guarantee legality and security. Drug trafficking is understood as the trafficking of illegal drugs, which involves cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and sale. Organized crime, on the other hand, refers to “a continuing criminal organization that operates rationally to profit” from activities such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, migrant smuggling, organ trafficking, illegal firearms sales, illegal trafficking of natural resources and wildlife, money laundering, product counterfeiting, extortion, and protection rackets, to name a few.

Transnational organized crime is the term used to describe the activities carried out by criminal organizations as a network connected across national borders. Transnational organized crime is operated by transnational criminal corporations, veritable businesses with complex organizational structures and a diverse range of lucrative activities. Drug trafficking is just one of their activities, albeit one of the most profitable, but not the only one. The weapons purchased by transnational criminal corporations, the money they launder, the people they traffic, and the minerals they trade all necessarily require the participation of legal entities, both state and corporate, which also benefit greatly.

Government and corporate corruption is a fundamental link in organized crime, and in a sense, we could also speak of organized corruption: calculated, known, permitted, continuous, and profit-driven. Organized corruption is not the exception, but rather a condition for blurring the lines between legal and illegal activity. Those who make up transnational criminal corporations are not only the stigmatized figures portrayed in series and films, nor the “big” kingpins typically arrested in large-scale military and media operations. The armed groups of these criminal corporations are only a fraction, the most visible because they are at the forefront of warfare with their drones, monster trucks, and high-powered weapons; but they are not the only ones. Economic and political elites in various parts of the world participate in or have connections with these criminal corporations.

At the heart of this “drug war” are neither security nor the individual and collective health risks that may arise from substance abuse, but rather the neocolonial objectives of an elite reorganizing the world.

Didn’t the network of millionaires, celebrities, and powerful figures that Jeffrey Epstein built and maintained for years, and in which Donald Trump participated, have ties to or direct involvement with transnational criminal organizations? The trafficking of women and girls, sexual exploitation, drug trafficking, and the banking operations related to these activities are clear evidence not only of the elites’ depravity but also of their participation and involvement in organized crime. And are the bankers who own the institutions where this money is laundered unaware? Are the arms manufacturers unaware of where their products end up? Are the producers of series and films that glorify organized crime ignorant of the values ​​and aspirations they cultivate in societies? Transnational criminal organizations are linked to governments, banks, financial institutions, arms manufacturers, technology developers, transportation companies, customs agencies, and so on.

Despite the efforts over the decades of such devoted & principled humanitarians as the Reagans, somehow the drug war seems far from victory, while drug proceeds mysteriously end up as liquid assets in the core banks of the financial system of the United States of America.

Their involvement in traditional financial systems is fundamental to their businesses, but also in new systems like cryptocurrencies. Combating transnational organized crime and criminal corporations would mean combating an essential part of the capitalist system, since organized crime is now a fundamental mechanism for obtaining profits, accumulating power, and building wealth. Meanwhile, the term “drug trafficking” has been debated from various angles due to the ideological use of the concept. In the 1990s, for example, Andean indigenous peoples who have historically had a cultural relationship with the coca leaf questioned how the term “drug trafficking” and the conception it fosters contribute to the criminalization of cultural expressions. This debate could extend to other peoples, territories, and plants around the world.

In other countries, such as Uruguay, the Netherlands, and even Mexico, a debate has been fostered around the production and consumption of marijuana and other soft drugs, framing it as a matter of health and education. Drug trafficking has been used by the US government to construct an adversary, as the enemy that rhetorically replaced communism, and which has served as a pretext for intervening in countries, instigating wars, launching hemispheric security plans, and kidnapping presidents.

At the heart of this war are neither security nor the individual and collective health risks that may arise from substance abuse, but rather the neocolonial objectives of an elite that is reorganizing the world. Organized crime, which is functional to capitalism, is complemented by the criminal policies of suffocating populations, bombing schools, murdering children, and perpetrating genocide. Crime and capitalism in the recolonization of the world.

The post Organized Crime & Capitalism appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

258
1
Clicks (mexicosolidarity.com)
 
 

Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics.

Oscar Lopez, Sheinbaum tells Trump: stop illegal arms trade from the US to Mexico The Guardian. The US president claimed he wanted to eradicate cartels and made comments about Mexico’s president that were deemed sexist in his Miami summit speech.

Zedryk Raziel, Los pueblos petroleros de Veracruz, una ventana al futuro con ‘fracking’ El País. Comunidades indígenas de Papantla se ubican sobre yacimientos de gas y aceite que el Gobierno quiere explotar mediante la técnica de la fractura hidráulica, considerada muy dañina por los ambientalistas.

Steelworkers solidify cross-border worker alliances amid CUSMA review USW. The trinational union meetings in Mexico occurred at the same time as an official Canadian government delegation of hundreds of businesspeople was pursuing investment opportunities in Mexico, without any labour representation.

Critica Trump rechazo de México a su “ayuda” contra el narcotráfico La Jornada. El mandatario de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, declaró que la presidenta de México, Claudia Sheinbaum, “no debió haber rechazado mi ayuda” sobre el combate a los cárteles del narcotráfico en territorio mexicano.

Chantal Flores, Vinyl, Lament, and Monterrey’s Enduring Beat Discogs. A slowed-down turntable accident sparked cumbia rebajada, a vinyl-driven sound that still echoes through Monterrey’s barrios decades later.

Gaspar Vela, México blindará la gasolina en 24 pesos frente a la volatilidad Milenio. Gobierno y empresarios renovarán esta semana un convenio para fijar precio del combustible; advierte Imco sobre el riesgo de activar estímulos fiscales.

Mexican Navy Ships Arrive in Havana With Humanitarian Aid Telesur English. Although President Sheinbaum said on February 26th her government would re-evaluate selling oil to Cuba in light of the US Supreme Court striking down Trump’s tariffs, no further announcement has been made.

Ricardo Pérez Trejo, Las plataformas digitales firman un acuerdo para combatir la violencia contra las mujeres; X se niega a colaborar Diario Red. Las secretaría de las Mujeres firmó un acuerdo con representantes de Meta, Google, y TikTok para combatir la violencia contra las mujeres en la conferencia de prensa de la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum de este miércoles 11 de marzo.

Martha Pskowski, Mexico’s Housing Laboratory shows off 32 low-cost prototypes The Architect’s Newspaper. (From 2019, but a relevant and interesting read considering the new social housing expansion from President Sheinbaum.)

Viri Ríos, Malentendidos de la popularidad de Sheinbaum Milenio. Aun si los mexicanos suelen identificar a “la inseguridad” como uno de los problemas más importantes de México, la popularidad de Sheinbaum no se encuentra anclada a su lucha contra el crimen organizado.

The post Clicks appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

259
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—On Friday, Venezuela’s Acting President Delcy Rodríguez presided over a high-level plenary working meeting with Colombian and Venezuelan ministers at Miraflores Palace in Caracas. The meeting aimed to consolidate binational integration by addressing critical issues such as security, trade, energy, tourism, and citizenship.

Addressing the vital discussion of binational citizenship for regional mobility, Rodríguez proposed that migrants from both nations be treated as citizens with full rights. This vision aligns with the “South American citizenship” framework originally proposed by the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). She recalled Venezuela’s historical role in welcoming millions of Colombians, emphasizing that shared border points, such as the Simón Bolívar Bridge, function as a single homeland envisioned by the Liberator Simón Bolívar.

In recent years, millions of Venezuelans have emigrated to escape the economic crisis generated by illegal US sanctions. Many have found Colombia to be one of the most welcoming countries in the region, despite the spike of xenophobic incidents against them in other countries, like Chile, Peru, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United States.

During the session, Rodríguez reiterated the importance of ending illegal US sanctions against Venezuela, noting their detrimental impact on regional integration and the economies of both countries. Addressing US President Donald Trump, she stated, “I want to take this opportunity to also send a message to the president of the United States, Donald Trump. Let it be understood that the sanctions against Venezuela affect the peoples of our Latin America. They have an impact on the economy of Colombia, on the economy of Venezuela, and on our peoples. The call is for an end to the sanctions against Venezuela, because this is also a way to promote regional integration.”

A significant milestone in binational trade was marked by the announcement of the first export shipment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Venezuela to Colombia via the Simón Bolívar Bridge. Rodríguez also projected the imminent export of natural gas through the refurbishment of the Ricaurte Gas Pipeline to interconnect both countries. Furthermore, she highlighted the strategic importance of Monómeros, the Venezuelan company based in Colombia, which remains a key actor for Colombian food production. In recent years, Colombia has expressed interest in purchasing the company, which was heavily affected by US sanctions and Juan Guaidó’s failed, illegitimate interim presidency.

To further these integration goals, Rodríguez announced that the Binational Commission for Good Neighborliness will meet in Maracaibo on April 23 and 24. New agreements were also signed to strengthen the binational zone of peace and development, while specialized working groups were launched to address defense and security. In the tourism sector, “multi-destination Venezuela-Colombia” plans were promoted to attract international visitors, particularly from Asia, to make the most of the landscapes of both nations.

The high-level encounter was preceded by several hours of discussion among working groups. The Colombian delegation included Foreign Minister Rosa Villavicencio, Commerce Minister Diana Morales, Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez, and Energy Minister Edwin Palma. Also present were Ricardo Roa, president of Ecopetrol, and Carmen Caballero, president of ProColombia, highlighting the commitment to strengthening bilateral relations.

Colombia, Venezuela Postpone Presidential Meeting

These developments occur as Colombia, currently holding the pro tempore presidency of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), prepares to host the 10th CELAC Summit on March 21 in Bogotá. According to the Colombian Foreign Ministry, the summit will include the CELAC-Africa High Level Forum. During the event, Colombia will transfer the presidency to Uruguay and oversee the adoption of the Bogotá Declaration, highlighting regional “progress” in peace-building, cooperation, and multilateralism.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

260
 
 

By Joseph Massad – Mar 12, 2026

It should be clear to Gulf Arab states hosting US bases that the American presence does not protect them but instead places them in danger

or the past month, US President Donald Trump and his secretaries of state and of war have emphasised a vision of the United States as a white Christian European nation at war with the non-Christian, non-white world.

It was therefore unsurprising that, before they attacked Iran on 28 February, American commanders reportedly told their troops that this was a war for “Armageddon” and would bring about the “return of Jesus”.

Reports circulating on social media claimed that US Air Force personnel were served steak and lobster for their “last supper” before embarking on their missions.

The obscene spectacle of Trump surrounded by Protestant Evangelical Christian Zionist religious leaders, praying for an American and Israeli victory against the non-white non-Christians they are bombing, set the tone for the US administration’s propaganda.

But it also reflects a deepening ideological divide within right-wing American politics. On one side are Evangelical Christian and Jewish Zionists who support wars against Iran and the Palestinians; on the other are right-wing Christians who believe that America is being drawn into wars on behalf of Israel.

Similarly, many on the American left, including progressive Jews such as Congresswoman Sara Jacobs, argue that Israel has pulled the United States into war. Rather than seeing the US-Israeli imperialist attack as serving the bellicose American billionaire class that fully backs it, these right-wing and left-wing critics contend that Benjamin Netanyahu tricked Trump into attacking Iran primarily for Israel’s benefit.

However, it is crucial to understand that Israel’s bellicose policies are an element of the overall US strategy in the region and do not exist independently of it. It is hardly far-fetched that the US aims to intensify the Arab states’ hostility towards Iran and incite them to openly join the US-Israel attack.

Blaming Israel
Some right-wingers cite the fact that prominent American billionaires, including Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, Bernard Marcus and Paul Singer, have promoted hostility towards Iran for the past decade as proof that such figures are “Israel firsters”, rather than “America firsters”, and that Israel controls US foreign policy.

They ignore how major American defence industries and energy companies directly benefit and stand to make huge profits from this war. Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Exxon, Raytheon and Boeing can hardly be accused of being Israel firsters, even if, like the billionaires, they believe that Israel’s regional military dominance serves the interests of US imperialism.

Instead of framing their criticism of the attack on Iran as driven by the imperialist warmongering of US financial elites – for whom the genocidal Israeli state is both an asset and a proxy – these right-wingers accuse Israel of “controlling” Washington’s decisions, thus effectively exonerating the United States of responsibility.

Israel and its intelligence and military apparatus and personnel are tightly integrated into the US war machine, but this is not proof, as some might argue, of Israeli “control” over this system, but rather the result of the US subcontracting significant intelligence and military functions to a trustworthy proxy.

Both Maga and left-wing critics of the war have interpreted recent comments by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio as an admission that Israel dragged the US to war.

What they forget is that Washington – on which Israel is almost entirely dependent for weapons supplies – could have ordered Israel not to attack. But the US chose not to do so, meaning that it approved of Israel’s war plans and coordinated with it beforehand.

Arab silence
Not a single Arab regime condemned the US-Israeli aggression against Iran, save for Oman, which described it as a “violation of international law“. Nor did any of them, except for the Yemeni Ansar Allah (Houthis), offer condolences to Iran for the massacre of more than 170 Iranian schoolgirlsand staff in Minab, or for the murder of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family and aides.

Even Recep Tayyip Erdogan, president of Nato member Turkey, saw fit to send condolences to Iran, while Arab governments remained silent. Iranian officials noted this in talks with Egyptian and Turkish counterparts aimed at de-escalating the conflict.

Algeria, which stood by its anti-imperialism for decades before recently switching to a pro-imperialist position when itvoted for Trump’s anti-Palestinian “Board of Peace” at the United Nations, confirmed its new orientation by refusing to condemn the aggression, while expressing solidarity with the Arab regimes against Iranian retaliation.

In Cairo, the Grand Imam of al-Azhar also registered his solidarity with the United Arab EmiratesBahrain,Kuwait and Jordan (though curiously not Qatar or Saudi Arabia) by condemning Iran, but not the US-Israeli aggression. He, too, offered no condolences for Khamenei, a religious leader revered by Shia worldwide.

The claim by the Gulf Arab states and Jordan that Iran is violating their sovereignty, while overlooking the fact that American forces are using their territory and airspace to violate Iran’s, is eminently unpersuasive.

All the Arab regimes whose countries were targeted by Iranian retaliation have ceded sovereignty over parts of their territories to the United States – and in some cases also Britain and France – allowing them to establish military bases to attack IraqSyria and now Iran.

Meanwhile, these states neither condemn nor attempt to prevent Israeli warplanes from traversing their skies to attack Iran – despite their protestations of “neutrality”.

Bases and sovereignty
Under the agreements governing US military bases, none of these countries has the right to know how many American troops enter or leave their territory, or to have any say over US military activities launched from them.

The bilateral agreements that allow American forces to be stationed in Qatar and Saudi Arabia have never been made public, and the unpopular agreement with Jordan is considered by many Jordanians to violatethe Jordanian constitution by infringing on the country’s sovereignty.

If Iran were to host Russian or Chinese bases used to attack the Gulf Arab states and Jordan, would these countries not consider it their right to retaliate?

If Iran were to host Russian or Chinese military and intelligence bases used to attack the Gulf Arab states and Jordan, would these countries not consider it their right to retaliate?

It remains curious that Qatar’s air defence system provided no early warning and no defence against the Israeli attack on Doha last September (nor did the US warn it, even though the Israelis informed the US of the impending attack), while it is apparently capable of detecting and at least attempting to defend US military and diplomatic assets in the country against Iranian retaliation.

Add to this reports claiming that Israel is behind several false-flag attacks targeting Aramco oil facilities in Saudi Arabia, as well as sites in Oman, Turkey and Azerbaijan.

The Iranians, who have readily taken responsibility for the attacks on Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and the American military Prince Sultan airbase in Saudi Arabia – which the Saudis keep insisting is a “Saudi” base (as do the rest of the Arab countries, which claim that US bases on their territory belong to their own military forces)  – denied any role in these other attacks.

Moreover, Gulf Arab states have complained that the US moved air defence systems stationed on their own territory to Israel, leaving them with minimal capabilities and increasing the damage across the region. No matter how much the Arab regimes give the Americans, this is a stark demonstration that Israel will always be Washington’s priority – at their expense.

Iran Strikes US Fifth Fleet Base – Bahrain Erupts in Uprising & Saudi Forces Move To Crush Dissent

Who threatens whom
It should be clear to Arab countries hosting US bases that the American presence does not protect them but places them and their populations in grave danger.

Without these bases, they would have been immune to Iranian retaliation.

Since the 1979 revolution, Iran has never attacked any country, including the Gulf Arab countries and Jordan – which provided massive financial, military, logistical, propaganda and diplomatic support for Iraq’s unprovoked invasion of Iran between 1980 and 1988, which killed more than a million people. Iran did not retaliate against them even once, as Iraq launched its invasion from its own territory, not from these Arab countries.

It is the Arab countries that have threatened Iran and supported aggression against it ever since the triumph of its revolution against the American-backed, Israel-allied dictatorship of the Shah.

Since 1981, the Saudis have advanced an Arab strategy – first presented by then Crown Prince Fahd – of normalising ties with Israel to contain an alleged Iranian threat and to convince the Arab peoples that Iran, not Israel, is the major enemy of the Arab nation, even though Israel, then and now, has always threatened both Arab countries and Iran.

Fahd’s initiative was revived in Crown Prince Abdullah’s so-called Arab Peace Plan in 2002.

That all these Arab concessions to Israel and Arab collusion against Iran have only further endangered Arab states and the Palestinians – now being subjected to genocide – has not deterred Arab rulers.

Indeed, this week, their ambassadors appealed to Russia to pressure Iran to halt its retaliation targeting US installations in their countries. Russian Foreign MinisterSergey Lavrov reminded them that they have sided with the US-Israeli aggression against Iran from day one, and their pretence of neutrality is just that.

If the damage they have suffered during this war does not convince these Arab states that the true threat to their safety is their alliance with the United States and Israel, then nothing will.

Joseph Massad is professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history at Columbia University, New York. He is the author of many books and academic and journalistic articles. His books include Colonial Effects: The Making of National Identity in Jordan; Desiring Arabs; The Persistence of the Palestinian Question: Essays on Zionism and the Palestinians, and most recently Islam in Liberalism.

(Middle East Eye)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

261
 
 

By Robert Inlakesh – Mar 12, 2026

Since February 28, following the Israeli-US war of aggression against Iran, the Islamic Republic has targeted vital US military infrastructure bases in Persian Gulf nations, the worst hit being Bahrain. Simultaneously, the assassination of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei has revived the predominantly Shia island’s 2011 revolutionary fervor.

With round the clock missile and drone strikes, civil unrest, damage to vital infrastructure and even rumors that its leader has fled, chaos has characterized the state of affairs in Bahrain. According to reports, the sudden devastation inflicted on Gulf economies have led to contestations from their leaderships, who claim to have not been sufficiently notified of the US-Israeli assault.

The first wave of Iranian retaliatory strikes targeted the Naval Support Activity (NSA) Bahrain base, striking it directly and inflicting damage to the headquarters for the US Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT). Locations belonging to the 5th Fleet were specifically targeted, resulting in large fires burning for hours.

Around twenty-four hours following the initiation of the conflict, the Islamic Republic of Iran officially announced the death of its leader, Ayatollah Khamenei. This development would subsequently impact Bahrain over any other Gulf nation, as its citizenry are predominantly Shia Muslims, who are ruled by the Sunni King, Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa, who was installed by the British.

For many Shia Muslims, Ayatollah Khamenei was their equivalent to what the Pope represents to Catholic Christians. The Bahraini Royal family, having normalized ties with Israel and who have relied on neighboring Gulf nations to violently put down protests and revolts, were immediately put in hot water by the use of their country to aid in the war effort against Iran.

As a result, Bahrainis began staging protests across the country for around four days.

This was until neighboring Saudi Arabia began deploying the Unified Military Command [formerly called the Peninsula Shield Forces] to crack down upon the brewing uprising. The details concerning potential further protests have since been scarce.

⚡️#BREAKING Exclusive: Peninsula Shield Forces seen in Bahrain.

They just entered from Saudi. pic.twitter.com/LhQ7KBqW6e

— War Monitor (@WarMonitors) March 2, 2026

Alongside the crackdown on protesters has also come a wave of arrests against individuals sharing videos of Iranian munitions impacting sites across the country. Washington-based pro-war think tank, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), said that the identities of those celebrating Iran’s strikes on US facilities have been reported to the Saudi-led security forces.

The deployment of the Unified Military Command was viewed as a historic development, not seen since the 2011 Bahraini Revolution, when the Saudi-led forces violently suppressed the revolt.

Amidst what appears to be a media blackout in regard to the protests over the past days, conflicting reports have emerged as to whether they are still ongoing or were quelled. Despite King Khalifa delivering a speech on March 8, speculation has continued to spread online that he may have departed the country for Saudi Arabia.

A source from the Bahraini diaspora, describing himself as a member of the opposition and who chose not to be named, told MintPress News that there was a campaign to paint dissent as disloyalty to the country in a bid to justify a broad crackdown:

“They want to portray us as traitors when we are the ones who have been advocating for the removal of the US navy from our country for the very reason we all see today. Look at what has happened now. Are we safer or has our nation’s security increased because of this collaboration? No.”

Tensions over the presence of US bases in Bahrain dates back to 1975 when the Royal Family disbanded the country’s Legislative Assembly, partly due to its opposition to the US Navy’s presence on the island. The move led to 25-years of rule by decree.

In 1981, the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Bahrain would attempt a military coup to transform the nation into an Islamic Republic. Then, between 1994 and 2000, Bahraini forces belonging primarily to Left wing factions led revolts and were critical of US presence inside the Kingdom. As recently as 2024, sizable protests continued to be held against the US Fifth Fleet.

Iran Dismantles US Military Bases
In a desperate bid to censor further documentation of the damage inflicted by Iranian missiles and drones, the Bahraini authorities are pursuing a legal campaign targeting what they call “high betrayal” for filming the ongoing retaliatory strikes. Bahrain’s Public Prosecution seeks to implement the “death penalty” and are operating on the basis that they will pursue violators “without the slightest mercy”.

Manama claims, without evidence, to have intercepted hundreds of Iranian drones and missiles. An announcement that appears to be contested by the video and satellite imagery, confirming the devastating accuracy of Iran’s attacks, particularly on US military facilities, but also on hotels that Tehran claims are hosting US service members.\

Two sources speaking to the Military Times, stated that Trump administration officials had even conceded during a private meeting on Capitol Hill that Iran’s drones were proving more difficult to counter than the Pentagon had anticipated. “They were ill-prepared,” one of the sources stated.

By March 4 alone, satellite imagery released by Planet Labs, revealed extensive damage to the US’s Fifth Fleet headquarters in Manama, the destruction of several large buildings and complexes, in addition to the obliteration of two satellite communications terminals.

As US Wages War for Regime Change, Iran Affirms Continuity

According to reports, the Juffair base has been to a great extent put out of service and the area was evacuated early on during the conflict. Iran also claimed to have destroyed much of a US airbase in the Sheikh Issa area, including through strikes on fuel tankers at the base.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) also reportedly targeted the Israeli Embassy in Bahrain. In retaliation to later US strikes from Bahraini territory, which destroyed a water desalination facility on Iran’s Qeshm Island, the Iranian military announced it had struck back at the US base in Juffair from which it came. The IRGC claims to have destroyed the US’s radars in Bahrain and degraded its surveillance systems.

Following an Iranian drone attack on US forces in Bahrain, a BAPCO oil refinery was additionally struck and damaged, leading to the company declaring majeure, a measure taken to release a company from contractual obligations.

During an Iranian wave of attacks on US military facilities and personnel in Bahrain, civilian homes were struck by a munition that injured around 30 people. Initially, Manama blamed an Iranian drone strike, however, footage later emerged showing a misfired air defense munition striking civilian infrastructure, contesting the Kingdom’s official account.

A video circulating from Bahrain appears to contradict claims from U.S. Central Command, which denied that a Patriot interceptor malfunctioned during an attempted interception earlier today.

CENTCOM says reports from Russian and Iranian media suggesting a U.S. Patriot missile… pic.twitter.com/ZKjwCxhrtH

— MintPress News (@MintPressNews) March 9, 2026

As satellite imagery has made it impossible to cover up the extent of the damage caused to US military facilities, a leading commercial satellite imaging company, Planet Labs, has even put a pause on its release of images of the region. The reasons cited were that it could aid in Iranian “battle damage assessment”.

These attempts to censor the extent of the damage caused by Iran’s ballistic missiles and loitering munitions, is not likely to succeed however, as Chinese satellite imaging companies have also been releasing evidence and are not likely to bow to external pressure.

There is also evidence that US forces have had to rely more heavily on sub-bases outside its main military facilities due to the attacks, which appear to also have come under fire. US service members are also known to have sought refuge in hotels, which have additionally come under fire, likely as an attempt to force military personnel to withdraw from the country.

Although the destruction has undoubtedly been overwhelming, in order to put military bases out of service, sustained attacks are necessary, which is why there are no indications that the Iranian military’s waves of attacks will cease.

(MintPress News)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

262
 
 

This article by Noi Mahoney originally appeared at Freight Waves on March 12, 2026.

The Trump administration has opened a new set of trade investigations targeting 16 trading partners — including Mexico and China — over alleged unfair trade practices and industrial overcapacity that the White House says is undermining American manufacturing.

The investigations, announced by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday, are being conducted under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, a law that allows the U.S. government to impose tariffs or other trade penalties if foreign policies are found to harm domestic commerce.

The probe will examine whether the targeted economies are producing more goods than their domestic markets can absorb and exporting the surplus to the U.S. — potentially suppressing wages, distorting prices and discouraging investment in U.S. factories.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the investigations will determine whether policies such as government subsidies, state-owned enterprises or labor practices create unfair advantages for foreign producers.

The vast majority of exports from Mexico come from US corporations who manufacture here, indicating that this is less about excess capacity and more about squeezing Mexico to give in to US imperialism’s significant demands in USMCA negotiations.

Mexico Faces Scrutiny Despite USMCA

Mexico’s inclusion in the probe could complicate trade relations within the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

U.S. officials say the investigation will examine whether certain industries in Mexico are producing more goods than domestic demand can absorb and exporting excess supply into the U.S. market.

The move comes just days before the scheduled start of the USMCA’s formal review process, highlighting growing tensions between Washington and its largest trading partner.

Mexico has become the top U.S. trading partner, with commerce between the two countries increasing 3.9% year over year to $872.83 billion in 2025. But U.S. officials argue that manufacturing overcapacity in some sectors could still distort trade flows.

China Remains Central Target

The U.S. has long accused China of subsidizing key industries, creating large manufacturing surpluses that flood global markets. These concerns have driven years of tariffs and trade disputes between the two countries.

Section 301 tariffs imposed during Trump’s first administration — and largely maintained by subsequent administrations — remain in place today and cover hundreds of billions of dollars in Chinese imports.

The new investigation could lead to additional tariffs or expanded restrictions on Chinese goods.

Tariffs Tied to Supreme Court Ruling

The investigations follow a recent Supreme Court decision striking down some tariffs imposed by Trump under emergency economic powers.

After the ruling, the Trump administration imposed new temporary trade penalties on U.S. trading partners under Section 301. The temporary tariffs are scheduled to expire after about 150 days unless extended.

USTR will open a public comment period on Tuesday, with hearings scheduled to begin May 5 on the new probe. Officials expect the investigations to conclude within roughly 150 days.

The post Trump Launches Investigation into Mexico for Excessive Manufacturing Capacity & Production appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

263
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Democratic Conviction Behind the Electoral ReformPresident Claudia Sheinbaum explained that she sent the Electoral Reform bill to Congress even though she knew its approval would be difficult, because it was a campaign promise and keeping one’s word is also a way of doing politics.

Sheinbaum noted that she could have negotiated certain points with the opposition parties to secure the necessary votes, but decided not to do so out of conviction. She emphasized that today we are experiencing a new way of doing politics in which legislators have the freedom to vote, and affirmed that it will be the citizens who judge their actions.

Security with Results: 4T Strategy Reduces CrimeSheinbaum explained that the strategy of addressing the root causes of violence, governing with honesty, and ending privileges is yielding results. As an example, Colima reported reductions in high-impact crimes during 2025, with 26% fewer intentional homicides, 50% fewer femicides, 60% fewer kidnappings, and 21% fewer extortions.

In addition, it was reported that from October 1, 2024, to March 10, 2026, a total of 2,790 suspects were arrested for high-impact crimes in the state, as a result of coordinated operations to strengthen peace and security.

Wellbeing and Public Work Projects Transform ColimaGovernor Indira Vizcaíno reported that poverty in Colima has been reduced by nearly half in recent years, as a result of wellbeing programs and policies that have improved the population’s living conditions.

In addition, the federal government announced infrastructure projects in the state, such as the MegaBachetón program, to fill in potholes, the construction of bridges, highways, and rural roads, along with an investment of more than 2.69 billion pesos (US$150 million) in hydraulic infrastructure.

International Confidence: Foreign Investment Remains Strong in MexicoSheinbaum reported that foreign investment continues to grow in the country, noting that international companies remain interested in investing in Mexico. She said that “investment in the country is going well,” highlighting the confidence in the Mexican economy.

Mexico promotes peace and international dialogueThe President announced a joint statement with Brazil and Colombia to push for a ceasefire in the Middle East, promoting a Latin American position in favor of peace.

Sheinbaum also welcomed the progress in the dialogue between the United States and Cuba to resolve their differences. She reiterated that Mexico will continue to send humanitarian aid to the island and emphasized that the country will always promote peace, diplomatic dialogue, and an end to the unjust blockade against Cuba.


The post People’s Mañanera March 13 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

264
 
 

Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro and Venezuela’s Acting President Delcy Rodriguez postponed their next meeting, delaying crucial talks on binational cooperation and energy integration.

A highly anticipated presidential meeting between Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro and Venezuela’s Acting President Delcy Rodriguez, scheduled for March 13, at the Atanasio Girardot International Bridge in Colombia, has been postponed.

In a joint communiqué both Governments cited “force majeure reasons” for the delay, committing to reschedule the crucial discussions aimed at strengthening binational cooperation and integration.

The meeting would have marked the first in-person presidential encounter for Acting President Rodriguez since she took office following the United States’ kidnapping of President Nicolas Maduro last January.

Text reads: “The Governments of Venezuela and Colombia inform public opinion that a presidential meeting of the two Heads of State was scheduled to take place at the Atanasio Girardot “Tienditas” International Bridge (Colombia) on March 13, 2026, with the purpose of continuing to strengthen the spirit of integration and brotherhood between the two nations and advancing initiatives for binational cooperation.”

Strategical Common Agenda
The primary objective of the bilateral discussions was to further solidify the spirit of integration and brotherhood between the two neighboring nations, advancing various binational strategic cooperation initiatives since the restoration of diplomatic relations in 2022.

At the same time, the bilateral agenda seeks to strengthen sovereignty through close institutional coordination aimed at ensuring peace across the binational territories, reaffirming the commitment to Latin American unity.

In this context, it prioritizes the promotion of economic and trade exchange through the border crossings in Zulia, Apure, and the Amazon region -areas considered vital for boosting production and improving the well-being of communities along the shared frontier.

A key area of focus for the leaders is energy cooperation, particularly Colombia’s expressed interest in importing Venezuelan natural gas. This interest was underscored by a recent announcement from the Colombian Government regarding an agreement with Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA to replace a section of the gas pipeline on the Colombian side, aiming to facilitate future gas transit.

Venezuela’s Delcy Rodríguez and Colombia’s Gustavo Petro to Meet Amid Shifting Regional Dynamics

Despite the postponement, President Petro maintains his invitation for Acting President Rodriguez to hold the presidential meeting in his country.

“The Governments of Colombia and Venezuela reiterate their willingness to strengthen trust, cooperation and bilateral relationship, promoting opportunities for the development and integration of border territories”, states the joint document, highlighting the strategic importance of their partnership.

Therefore, while the immediate meeting has been delayed, the strategic imperative for Colombia and Venezuela to work closely together persists, setting the stage for future productive discussions.

(teleSUR)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

265
 
 

This article by Rafael Ramírez originally appeared in the March 11th, 2026 edition of El Sol de México.

The Senate of the Republic approved this Wednesday, in general and in particular, the constitutional reform promoted by President Claudia Sheinbaum to put a limit to the so-called “golden pensions” in the public service.

By unanimous vote, the plenary session approved with 116 votes in favor the ruling that reforms article 127 of the Constitution, with the purpose of establishing that retirements and pensions financed with public resources cannot exceed the maximum amount of remuneration received by the head of the federal Executive Branch, in accordance with the constitutional principle that no public servant can earn more than the President.

The reform proposes that the pensions of trusted personnel in the parastatal sector cannot exceed 50 percent of the remuneration of the head of the Presidency of the Republic, which currently would be equivalent to approximately 70,000 pesos ($3,900USD) per month.

According to estimates presented during the legislative debate, the measure would impact approximately 6,297 former public sector officials and employees who currently receive pensions exceeding that amount. These include primarily retirees from Luz y Fuerza del Centro, Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE), and some state- owned financial institutions.

Lawmakers from the ruling party indicate that, if the reform is fully approved, it would allow for savings of close to five billion pesos annually for the treasury.

Morena Defends End of Privileges, While Opposition Points Out Inconsistencies

During the discussion, Morena senator Óscar Cantón Zetina argued that the reform seeks to bring order to the pension system financed with public resources. “We are convinced that when it comes to defending the public interest and strengthening justice in the use of the Nation’s resources, this Senate demonstrates that it is up to the task of serving the people of Mexico.”

The legislator stressed that the goal is not to eliminate pensions, but to prevent disproportionate retirements financed with public resources.

Although they voted in favor of the ruling, opposition legislators raised several reservations about the design of the reform.

Luis Donaldo Colosio Riojas, Senator from the Citizens’ Movement party stated that it is necessary to correct the inequalities in the pension system, but warned that the reform could generate legal problems if it affects previously acquired rights. “There are thousands of people who receive pensions of three or four thousand pesos a month, while others receive hundreds of thousands of pesos paid by the same state. This inequality must be corrected.”

However, he questioned the reform’s exclusion of the Armed Forces and warned that linking the cap to the presidential salary could create uncertainty.

Meanwhile, a fellow senator, Alejandra Barrales, acknowledged that the initiative could generate significant savings, but warned that the pension system in Mexico faces a much larger structural problem, explaining that currently one out of every five pesos of the federal budget is allocated to pension payments, while the country’s pension liability could reach 11.4 trillion pesos in the coming decades.

Senator Carolina Viggiano, from the PRI , expressed concern about the possibility that the reform could have retroactive effects that affect labour rights acquired by retired workers. She also questioned why the initiative does not include other sectors of the State, such as the Judiciary or certain special regimes, and suggested that the project could be motivated by political calculations.

After its approval in the Senate , the ruling was sent to the Chamber of Deputies for analysis. Since it is a constitutional reform , if it is approved by San Lázaro it must subsequently be approved by at least 17 state congresses before its promulgation and entry into force.

The post Senate Concludes Vote Against “Golden Pensions”; Sends Reform to San Lázaro appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

266
 
 

By Luis Linares Zapata  –  Mar 11, 2026

To achieve hegemonic imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism, several prerequisites must be in place. The most important is the backing of a military capable of sustaining those ambitions. But military power alone is not enough. Other conditions are equally necessary: a formidable economy equipped with sophisticated global financial mechanisms, capable of penetrating an extensive and diversified market. That economy must in turn be supported by productive technologies that render it efficient.

If, beyond this, a media network exists that can reach diverse audiences across at least a substantial portion of the empire’s areas of interest, then the picture is complete. The particular combination of these requirements varies depending on the nature of the clientele to be subjugated.

Cultural and ideological influence can be layered on top to further facilitate the domination being sought. Ethnic supremacism has served, in every past and present case, as an active undercurrent.

The case of the United States, a dominant power for over a century, warrants closer examination. Its hegemony is no longer universal in reach. There are vast domains where it now encounters resistance that constrains it. China, over the past several years, has risen to the level of an enormous and thoroughly modern global power. Its military, market, technological sophistication, and scientific and educational infrastructure have each, in their own right, surpassed their American counterparts. A coalition of alliances (BRICS among them), operating outside the US orbit, has succeeded in pooling enough resources to sustain genuine and active independence.

Internal tensions within the United States itself erect further barriers, forcing a degree of restraint. That restraint has not been faithfully observed of late, but the constraints remain. The political leadership of this empire has watched the external consensus that once complemented and legitimized its actions erode rapidly, above all when it comes to the kinds of dictates that demand either submission or voluntary compliance. Faced with this increasingly adverse landscape, the resort to extreme instruments has intensified: tariffs first, and where tariffs fall short, force.

The Trump Corollary: Imperialist Offensive and the Assault on Venezuela

Military action, then, becomes the blunt instrument deployed in the service of hegemonic rescue. This has been conspicuous in two simultaneous cases: Venezuela first, then Iran. Other candidates are already being named, including Cuba, Mexico, and whoever else happens to suit the empire’s tastes and whims. To navigate around these mandates, or to blunt their effects, targeted nations have adopted varying strategies. Some seek accommodation without outright submission, avoiding direct confrontation. Others have chosen a position of dignity and firmness, building alliances that extend their own reach, approaches that have taken shape in recent years as genuine alternatives for sovereign self-determination.

The tension generated by this already overextended leadership, stoked by President Donald Trump’s ostentatious displays of dominance, may yet intensify further.

The accumulated weight of so much volatility has produced dangerous instabilities for which no adequate remedy has been found.

Chief among them is a widespread awareness that the old rules, institutions, and rituals of multilateralism have been broken. The confidence that once attached to established decision-making channels for coordinating international action has been gravely undermined. A kind of institutional habit has taken hold: cushioning the unpredictable, learning to absorb Trump’s temperamental improvisations. This cautious posture toward the powerful is understandable and even advisable, yet it does not rule out the alternative of firm, decisive opposition, which is precisely what China demonstrated, with tangible results.

This has reinforced, among other nations, irrespective of their quality or strength, the awareness of adopting measures of active prudence (Europe), as what is already happening—in the pursuit of maintaining US hegemony—involves the use of extreme force, especially against nations with unequal capabilities. This is the path a declining empire takes when it can no longer halt its slide through other means.

Although the empire’s reach is no longer what it once was at the global level, it retains its coercive weight at the regional one. Military force, accordingly, has become the uncompromising fallback in the face of decline and rising competition. Trump has turned to indirect maneuvers to compensate for his vulnerabilities, among them the construction of support coalitions for his ventures. The thin credibility of those who answer the call makes such coalitions as revealing as they are faintly absurd. The recently announced Shield of the Americas is exposed for what it is, not by those who joined, but by the dignified nations that chose to stay away.

Those with a colonized mentality rushed to their own prostration, hoping for assistance and prestige that do not exist. A similar logic runs through Trump’s attempt to seize the Gaza coastline for private and family gain.

(La Jornada)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

267
 
 

By Ibrahim Al-Amine – MaR 11, 2026

The return of the resistance to the battlefield this swiftly was not, despite elements suggesting otherwise, simply an act of solidarity with Iran. For Hezbollah, the conflict has entered an existential phase, and direct confrontation has become the only way to change the balance of power on the ground.

Understanding this moment requires examining what happened inside the Hezbollah organization since the large-scale war ended in late November 2024. The war was costly. Israel assassinated key figures in the party’s political and military leadership. Yet after absorbing the shock, the organization adopted a deliberate strategy of ambiguity that came to govern its daily operations.

While Hezbollah’s civilian institutions, including its educational, health, and social networks, remained active and visible to the public, the military wing gradually withdrew from view and moved almost entirely underground.

Informal channels that had existed for two decades, through which journalists could gain some insight into the resistance’s activities, were effectively shut down. For reporters, reliable information about the military structure became nearly impossible with no confirmed names, no clear titles, and no meetings or contacts that once existed.

The rules were strictly enforced, and the leadership refused to respond to pressure from supporters who interpreted the silence as weakness.

The last war exposed how deeply Israeli intelligence had penetrated Hezbollah’s internal structure through technology, human sources, and accumulated experience. Yet Israeli officials are now expressing growing concern about the limits of their current knowledge and the real impact of the blows they claim to have inflicted over fifteen months of fighting.

Under these conditions, predicting the resistance’s actions has become difficult.

No state changes its army commander in the middle of a war, and the political leadership will not take steps that would lead to civil conflict.

On the Lebanese political front, senior officials appear to rely largely on the US–Israeli narrative of the regional war. Many within Lebanon’s pro-Western political camp assumed Hezbollah would remain passive. Their calculation was to freeze the question of the party’s weapons until Iran falls, after which, resolving the issue would become straightforward.

Events unfolded differently; Hezbollah chose to open fire.

The Lebanese army, for its part, has made clear it will not be drawn into an internal confrontation. Senior security sources say the army leadership has long warned American and Saudi interlocutors that forcing the military to confront the resistance would lead directly to civil war. With open war now underway with Israel, such a step would amount to political suicide.

IRGC Launches 40th Wave of Operation True Promise 4 in Cooperation With Hezbollah

A coordinated campaign, however, has emerged against the army leadership. The “defenders of sovereignty” have launched attacks on the army commander, demanding his dismossal as well as other security chiefs because they refused to implement the government’s decision to dissolve the party’s military wing. Washington quickly supported the pressure and reportedly provided Lebanese officials with a shortlist of potential replacements.

A new leadership would be expected to deploy the army against Hezbollah, suppress its supporters by force, and arrest figures linked to the resistance. Some political circles have gone further, discussing dissolving the party and issuing arrest warrants against its secretary-general, Sheikh Naim Qassem.

Even some of the same financial and political figures who oversaw the plundering of depositors’ savings are now proposing to confiscate the assets of Hezbollah-linked institutions, including funds and gold held by the Al-Qard Al-Hassan association, to help repay Lebanon’s banking sector debts.

Until recently, the country appeared close to a dangerous escalation. But according to the latest reports, Lebanese officials say the immediate crisis has been contained. A basic consensus has emerged that no state changes its army commander in the middle of a war, and the political leadership will not take steps that would lead to civil conflict.

The real question confronting Lebanon’s leadership is therefore not what it can do, but what it must avoid doing, particularly steps that would ultimately serve Israel’s interests or ignite civil conflict. The issue is no longer whether the army will confront the resistance, but what role it can realistically play in preventing the situation from spiraling further as the war with Israel intensifies.

(al-akhbar)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

268
 
 

Acting President Delcy Rodríguez has announced the victory of Chavista leadership following the US empire legally recognizing the Venezuelan authorities.

“I am proud, because today’s news is that the Venezuelan government has been legally recognized,” Rodríguez stated this Wednesday, March 11. “This is not recognition of a person or a government; it is recognition of a country, so that the country can recover its way of life, can breathe again in terms of services, health, and education.”

The statement followed a notification from the US State Department to a New York federal court formally recognizing the Venezuelan government. Analysts explain that the move de facto ends the “interim government” of Juan Guaidó and the 2015 National Assembly fiction, which served as the legal basis for the seizure of Venezuelan assets abroad, including CITGO—a subsidiary of the Venezuelan publicly-owned oil company PDVSA—and two tons of gold held in the Bank of England.

Normalization of diplomatic and trade relations
Rodríguez emphasized that the process of reorganization and normalization is a right that the nation deserves. The acting president further noted that both governments maintain daily conversations to discuss their respective points of view regarding diplomatic ties.

She also clarified that, within the framework of restored relations, Venezuela has purchased medicines from the US entity. While the US Embassy in Caracas attempted to present the operation as a donation, analysts have denounced that narrative, confirming it was a commercial transaction.

“I am proud that Venezuela can now have trade relations,” Rodríguez added. “Just as the US buys oil and gold from us, we can buy medicines and equipment, and this will help to recover the health system.”

For over a decade, the US regime prevented Venezuela from purchasing medical supplies, medicines, and components for medical equipment. This offensive intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, preventing the nation from acquiring vaccines, as repeatedly denounced by Venezuelan officials. This includes President Nicolás Maduro, who has been illegally held in the US since being kidnapped on January 3, 2026, after US troops bombed populated areas in Caracas, Miranda, La Guaira, and Aragua.

US Forced to Legally Recognize Venezuelan Government, Opens Path to Recovery of $30 Billion in Stolen Assets

Call for national unity
Rodríguez strongly urged for national unity, stating that the current effort must be for the political, economic, and social health of the country. “All organizations have a place here,” she said.

Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as acting president by the National Assembly on January 5, following a Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) decision issued two days earlier. The TSJ designated her to temporarily fulfill the role following the US kidnapping of President Maduro until his safe return. Rodríguez has consistently reaffirmed that President Maduro remains the constitutional and legitimate president of Venezuela, a stance she emphasized during an interview with the US network NBC on February 12.

This formal recognition follows an announcement on Saturday, March 7, by the president of the US empire, Donald Trump, during a speech at the Shield of the Americas summit in Florida. Trump reversed his 2019 decision to recognize Juan Guaidó, a move that originally forced the severance of diplomatic ties between the two nations.

(Alba Ciudad) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

269
 
 

Venezuelans marched in Caracas on Thursday, March 12, in support of peace and freedom and reaffirming their commitment to national sovereignty. The marchers called for the freedom of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, National Assembly Deputy Cilia Flores, illegally imprisoned in the US.

The mobilization brought together social movements and organized communities from the early hours of Thursday morning at Plaza Morelos de Bellas Artes, the starting point of the march.

Mobilization in Caracas reaffirming Venezuelan sovereignty and demanding freedom for President Maduro. Photo: Ricardo Malik/Telesur.

Mobilization in Caracas reaffirming Venezuelan sovereignty and demanding freedom for President Maduro. Photo: Ricardo Malik/Telesur.

The marchers also expressed support for Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the actions promoted by the Venezuelan government to maintain stability and peace in the country.

In the context of the mobilization, the minister of Social Labor Process, Eduardo Piñate, called for cohesion and unity among all sectors to safeguard the integrity of the country. “We always call for national unity because the enemy wants to tear us apart to hand over the nation in pieces to the empire,” said Piñate.

“They had to attack us militarily to be able to kidnap the president and the first lady and take them to the United States, but we remain steadfast here,” the minister declared in his address to the demonstrators.

Just like in recent mobilizations, the people demanded the release and return of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, kidnapped by US special forces through a military invasion in the early hours of January 3, in which 120 people were murdered.

One of the promoters of the march was the secretary of Mobilization of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), Nahum Fernández, in addition to the popular sectors who took to the streets to express their position in defense of the independence and stability of the nation.

The mobilization also expressed support for policies aimed at strengthening the country’s productive activity and to reaffirm the commitment to the political transformation process promoted by the government.

Demonstration to be Held During Hearing of President Maduro & Cilia Flores in New York City

During the march, participants chanted slogans in support of the authorities and in defense of peace, such as “Peace is our victory,” “Delcy, move forward, you have my trust!” and “Nicolás and Cilia: the home of the nation.”

The march from Plaza Morelos moved through the center of the capital and passed through Carabobo Park square on the Universidad Avenue, heading toward the Corazón de Jesús corner in La Hoyada.

Thereafter, it continued to the headquarters of the Ministry of Science and Technology and then to the San Francisco corner, near the National Assembly, where demonstrations from various neighborhoods of the city joined.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

270
 
 

Venezuela formalized the signing of an agreement with the oil companies Repsol (Spain) and Eni (Italy) for the development of the Cardón IV Consortium, one of the most important gas projects in the Caribbean.

The event, held on Thursday, March 12, was led by the acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, who highlighted the importance of this alliance for the country’s energy sovereignty and the stability of the international market.

She highlighted that the Cardón IV project is not only a key piece for national industrial development but also a pillar for Venezuela’s insertion into the global hydrocarbons market.

“The Cardón IV project woulld guarantee the supply of gas in our country, as well as for export,” Rodríguez said, emphasizing that the strengthening of these operations allows Venezuela to consolidate itself as a reliable producer and supplier.

In a gesture of energy diplomacy, the acting president thanked the representatives of the European companies for maintaining their operations in Venezuela despite external pressures.

“In the name of the Venezuelan people, I thank you and say: here is a work team,” she said.

Thereafter, she formally handed over the duty of supervision of the project to the minister of Hydrocarbons, Paula Henao.

Moreover, Rodríguez underscored Venezuela’s role as a fundamental actor in OPEC and OPEC+, pointing out that the guiding principle of Venezuelan oil policy is to guarantee a reliable energy supply, contribute to the balance of the international economy, and promote multipolar cooperation in the energy sector.

With this signing, Venezuela takes a firm step toward expanding its natural gas export capacity, leveraging its vast reserves for the benefit of the people and global economic integration.

Venezuela: Oil Production Grows 10% in February

This new agreement with Repsol and Eni adds to other recent agreements with other giants in the sector, such as Shell.

The agreement with Shell, focused on the reactivation of strategic oil production units, marked a turning point in the national energy policy by establishing mutually beneficial schemes aimed at increasing production through the incorporation of cutting-edge technology and international capital.

Similarly, Rodríguez has driven a transformation in the country’s hydrocarbon sector, with agreements for gas export licenses and attracting investments for the processing of heavy crude oil.

On January 29, Venezuela enacted a partial reform of the Organic Law of Hydrocarbons, which modified 18 articles of the legal framework regulating the national oil industry. This reform, according to the Venezuelan government, responds to the need to modernize the energy sector, attract technological investment and capital, and reactivate production after years of unilateral coercive measures imposed by the US against the country.

(Telesur)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

271
 
 

This article by Dora Villanueva originally appeared in the March 13, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Three out of every four people in Mexico who are born into poverty and spend their lives providing unpaid care for others die in poverty. Thus, the burden of caregiving—carried out primarily by women—is a determining factor in the inequality of opportunity among the Mexican population and “a factor that exacerbates poverty,” as evidenced by the Espinosa Yglesias Center for Studies (CEEY).

According to the organization, the role of caregiving among the determining factors of inequality of opportunity in Mexico is significant. In fact, it ranks third, only behind the economic resources of the household in which a person grew up and their parents’ level of education. It even ranks higher than factors historically analyzed such as indigenous status, skin tone, or coming from a rural area.

Amid the growing debate about the need for a solid framework for the National Care System, as the first mechanism to redress historical inequalities in a labor market still foreign to more than half of the women in the country, the CEEY showed that unpaid care work is the third factor that most conditions inequality in Mexico.

In its study Social Mobility and Care, the association shows that in 40 percent of Mexican households with fewer resources, unpaid care becomes an additional obstacle to climbing the so-called “social ladder,” that is, for a person to be able to modify their socioeconomic position throughout their life or in relation to that of their parents.

In this population group, 73 percent of caregivers rely on this income throughout their lives, compared to 64 percent who do not carry this type of burden, the report shows, based on the ESRU Survey of Social Mobility in Mexico 2023.

The report highlights the intersections of inequality with gender: 76 percent of caregivers in Mexico are women, so the lack of an extensive National Care System represents an obstacle, especially for them.

“Caregivers have fewer educational, employment, and political and social participation opportunities, which reduces their chances of improving their socioeconomic position compared to that of their parents,” the CEEY stated.

Mónica Orozco, author of the report and director of Genders, pointed out that “on top of already low social mobility”, caregiving becomes “an anchor for the lowest strata of society”, and on top of this obstacle, being a woman has 10 times greater weight in the inequality of opportunities among those who take on these tasks.

Unpaid work not only presents an obstacle to accessing the labor market, but also leads to educational risks and greater negative impacts on the mental health of caregivers, which opens up another niche for providing care to the latter, Orozco explained.

At this point, Ortiz and Gonzalo Hernández Licona, director of the CEEY Social Observatory, explained that beyond what is the responsibility of the State, care must also be seen in light of its co-responsibility with the private sector.

Hence the importance of the agreements being made by the Mexican Social Security Institute and the Ministry of Economy, together with private companies, to recognize the economic importance of care and see it as part of a package of labour benefits.

The post Three of Every Four Unpaid Caregivers Never Cease Being Poor appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

272
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Venezuela has expressed its condemnation of the recent announcement by Guyana regarding the start of a three-dimensional seismic exploration campaign in undelimited waters claimed by Venezuela.

According to the statement published this Wednesday, March 11, these activities are intended to be carried out in maritime areas that Georgetown is unilaterally trying to present as part of its supposed “exclusive economic zone,” despite these being waters pending delimitation between both nations.

Venezuela emphatically demanded that the Guyanese government refrain from any actions that violate the principles of international law. The statement underscores the 1966 Geneva Agreement’s prohibition on adopting measures that could create or exacerbate differences, urging Guyana not to deviate from the international legal framework or existing governing agreements.

Since 2018, the US empire’s oil giant ExxonMobil—a sworn foe of Chavista Venezuela as labeled by analysts—has conducted illegal survey operations in undelimited waters. Over the years, it has faced warnings from the Venezuelan military demanding the cessation of those illegal operations.

In December 2018, ExxonMobil reported that a research vessel, the Ramform Tethys, was intercepted by the Venezuelan Navy. The vessel was owned by the Norwegian seismic services provider PGS. Similar incidents have been repeated over the years as Venezuela reaffirms its historical stance of defending its territory and maritime sovereignty.

The communiqué clearly warns that the nation does not and will not recognize any concession, license, or activity for the exploration or exploitation of natural resources unilaterally granted to international corporations by Guyana in the disputed areas.

These new unilateral and threatening actions by Guyana are part of the long-standing territorial dispute over the Essequibo territory, where Venezuela reaffirms the full validity of the 1966 Geneva Agreement and rejects the unilateral and unlawful decision of Guyana to take the dispute to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Venezuela’s Vice President: Guyana Has Opened the Door to US Invasion

The Geneva Agreement, recognized by the UN and Guyana, is the only valid legal framework for achieving a practical and satisfactory solution for both parties. It invalidates the 1899 Paris Arbitration Award, which Caracas denounces as a colonialist fraud intended to deprive the country of its sovereign territory. In its preamble, the agreement explicitly prohibits unilateral actions by the signatory parties.

Guyana’s announcement also represents a flagrant violation of the Argyle Declaration, signed in December 2023 by Presidents Nicolás Maduro and Irfaan Ali in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In that agreement, both nations formally committed to maintaining the region as a zone of peace and to refrain from any action, whether verbal or physical, that could escalate the conflict in the maritime and land areas pending delimitation.

Below, you can read the full unofficial translation of the Venezuelan communiqué:

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela categorically rejects the announcement made by the Government of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana regarding the start of a three-dimensional seismic exploration campaign in maritime areas that the country intends to present unilaterally as part of its alleged “exclusive economic zone.”

Guyana again reiterates its intention to carry out unilateral exploration activities over part of the maritime spaces that are pending delimitation, in open contravention of fundamental principles of international law.

Venezuela demands that the Government of Guyana refrain from carrying out unilateral acts that may harm principles of customary law that govern the international relations of coastal countries and, in particular, those that prohibit states from adopting measures that may create or aggravate differences and depart from the framework of international law, as well as from compliance with agreements and guiding principles.

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela reiterates that it does not recognize and will not recognize any concession, license, or activity of exploration or exploitation of natural resources in undelimited maritime areas that have been unilaterally granted by Guyana, nor the rights that third parties claim to derive from such illegal acts.

Caracas, March 11, 2026.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/AU


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

273
 
 

This article by Patricia Calvillo originally appeared in the March 13, 2026 edition of El Sol de San Luis.

Indigenous communities of the Tének and Nahuatl ethnicities in the Huasteca region of San Luis Potosí have raised their voices to express their rejection of any oil and gas exploration and extraction project that involves the use of hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, in the region. In a statement addressed to the President of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, representatives of these communities warned of the environmental, social, and cultural risks that they assert would result from implementing such projects in their territory.

The document was issued in recent days from the municipality of Tancanhuitz de Santos, in the Huasteca Potosina region, and is addressed to both the federal government and national and international public opinion. In it, the communities express their concern over what they consider a change in the government’s commitment to prohibiting hydraulic fracturing, a technique used to extract hydrocarbons from complex geological formations.

The signatories of the statement point out that fracking consists of injecting fluids at high pressure to fracture the rock and release gas or oil trapped underground, although the possibility of using water recycling systems has been raised, they warn that the technique involves inherent risks such as the release of methane, the possible generation of induced seismicity and the production of toxic waste derived from the process.

According to the communities, the official discourse has presented the extraction of national gas as a strategy for energy sovereignty; however, they maintain that the development of unconventional deposits in Mexico depends largely on technology, machinery, and specialized services from foreign companies, mainly from the United States, which in their view would maintain a form of technological dependence.

Communities also argue that proceeding with such projects without their consent would violate the rights of Indigenous peoples recognized in the Mexican Constitution and international treaties. They cite Articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution, as well as Convention 169 of the International Labour Organization , which establishes the right of Indigenous peoples to be consulted in a prior, free, and informed manner about projects that may affect their territories.

One of the central points of the statement is the impact the technique would have on water, a fundamental resource for life and the economy of the region. The Huasteca region is known for its abundance of rivers, springs, and other bodies of water, but community representatives warn that the extraction processes require large volumes of fresh water to begin operations.

According to the document, the first stage of fracking would require millions of liters of water that would have to be extracted from local rivers or aquifers; in addition, they mention that recycling the water used in the process is not completely efficient and generates residual sludge that may contain hazardous chemicals.

The communities point out that the project would directly affect 3,268 localities where mostly Indigenous Tének and Nahuatl peoples live.

They question the feasibility of installing oil projects in areas far from populated areas, as has been suggested in some technical presentations. In the Tampico-Misantla Basin region, there is a high density of rural and Indigenous communities, meaning that virtually any project would be located near agricultural areas or water sources.

The potential impact of this phenomenon is not limited to the environmental sphere. Communities point out that the project would directly affect 3,268 localities inhabited primarily by indigenous Tének and Nahuatl peoples, populations that have historically faced poverty and marginalization.

They believe that the introduction of extractive projects could profoundly alter the social and economic fabric of the region, affecting traditional activities such as small-scale agriculture and access to natural resources on which numerous families depend.

Communities say economic development cannot be built on the dispossession of Indigenous territories or on environmental degradation.

Another point of concern is the risk to existing bodies of water in the area. According to the communities , there are at least 1,019 rivers, springs, aquifers, and other water bodies in the region that could be directly or indirectly affected by mining activity.

Furthermore, soil disturbance and potential contamination could trigger a process of environmental degradation that would affect local biodiversity. The Huasteca region is considered to be of great biological richness, with flora and fauna species that form part of the country’s natural heritage.

The communities also argue that proceeding with such projects without their consent would violate the rights of Indigenous peoples recognized in the Mexican Constitution and international treaties. They cite Articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution, as well as Convention 169 of the International Labour Organization , which establishes the right of Indigenous peoples to be consulted in a prior, free, and informed manner about projects that may affect their territories.

Given this situation, they have decided not to give their consent to the strategic plan that contemplates the exploitation of hydrocarbons in the area, nor to any initiative that may affect their territory, their culture, or their natural environment.

The statement also affirms that the Huasteca region should not be considered a sacrifice zone for energy projects and maintains that it is a living ecosystem and a territory with a millennia-old cultural history that requires protection, not exploitation.

Finally, they formally requested a direct meeting with President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo to establish a respectful and direct dialogue about the future of the region. They stated that economic development cannot be built on the dispossession of Indigenous territories or on environmental degradation.

The post Indigenous Communities Tell Sheinbaum Fracking Threatens Huasteca Potosina’s Social Fabric & Natural Resources appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

274
 
 

This article originally appeared in the March 12, 2026 edition of Los Reporteros.

The embassy stated that the show is propaganda linked to the sectarian organization Falun Gong and asked the Mexican public not to attend the show.

The cult publishes The Epoch Times*, a newspaper known for actively supporting far right politicians and conspiracy theories.*

The Chinese Embassy in Mexico issued a statement condemning the nature of the performances by Shen Yun Performing Arts, scheduled to take place at the National Auditorium in Mexico City during April and May of this year. The diplomatic mission asserted that the show is linked to the Falun Gong sect and urged the public not to attend, calling it anti-Chinese propaganda.

In a statement released on social media, the embassy noted that Falun Gong was banned by the Chinese government in 1999 and labeled it a cult-like organization. It asserted that the Shen Yun performance is not merely a cultural presentation, but rather part of a strategy to spread political messages and expand the movement’s influence.

The document also states that in recent years various international media outlets have reported criticisms and complaints related to the internal workings of the artistic company, including accusations of labor exploitation, mistreatment of minors and control over its members , situations that some former members have brought against the organization.

Ahead of the upcoming performances in Mexico, the embassy called on the public to distinguish between traditional Chinese culture and what it considers expressions linked to Falun Gong. It also stated that it will continue working with various sectors in Mexico to strengthen bilateral relations and, as it indicated, prevent the spread of what it describes as sectarian organizations.

The post People’s Republic of China Embassy Warns Mexico About Shen Yun Performances appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

275
 
 

This article originally appeared in the March 12, 2026 edition of El Financiero.

Iran’s ambassador to Mexico, Abolfazl Pasandideh, asked the government of President Claudia Sheinbaum on Thursday, March 12, to condemn the attacks by US President Donald Trump against Tehran.

Abolfazl Pasandideh warned that a potential victory for Washington in the Iran conflict could open the door to aggression against other countries, including Mexico and Cuba .

In an interview with journalist Ciro Gómez Leyva, the diplomat stated that Iran is seeking international support in the face of military actions that, he asserted, have been driven by the United States and Israel .

Pasandideh noted that one of the governments that, in his opinion, has adopted the “most appropriate” stance so far is that of Spain. “The best position in the world, so far, has been that of the Spanish government.”

Iran thanks Mexico for its call for peace amid war with the US

The ambassador thanked Mexico for calling for peace and supporting Spain’s decision not to attack Iran. “In this case, it was completely different from what other countries like Germany and other European countries did, which are in favor of the United States,” he said.

Iran’s ambassador to Mexico warned about the possible geopolitical implications of a US victory in Tehran: “I have also said in my interviews that if the US wins something in Iran, it will not be difficult for them to try to win in Cuba or even in Mexico.”

The diplomat also recalled the principles of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, noting that Mexico has historically defended the sovereignty of the States.

“We, as also stated in the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, defend the sovereignty of territories and countries. That is why we ask Mexico to condemn this entire act,” he expressed.

Pasandideh also stated that the Iranian embassy has received numerous expressions of support from Mexican citizens.

“In just one day, we have received more than 10 calls from Mexicans. In addition, we are receiving many emails from the Mexican nation condemning this entire act by the United States and Israel,” he stated.

The ambassador also denounced attacks against civilians and mentioned the case of a bombing against a school.

“They also mention the instant killing of 165 children by a US bomb recently dropped on a school,” he said.

The post Iran Asks President Sheinbaum to Condemn US Attacks: “If the US wins, it won’t be difficult for them to attack Mexico or Cuba” appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›