Latin American Publications!

123 readers
95 users here now

A community for Latin American publications.

NOTE: All the publications in this feed are Latin American in origin; that does not mean they only report on Latin American news.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
226
 
 

This article by Rubicela Morelos Cruz originally appeared in the January 31, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Cuernavaca, Morelos. This Saturday the Mexican Anti-Imperialist Front for Venezuela and the freedom of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, and for the self-determination of peoples was formed, where the ambassador of Venezuela in Mexico, Stella Marina Lugo Betancourt de Montilla, was present.

The person in charge of asking for the vote for the approval of this Anti-Imperialist Front in Morelos was the social activist and husband of the governor Margarita González, Carmelo Enríquez, to the more than 500 members of different social, political, civil, teachers’ and peasant organizations who met this Saturday in the auditorium of the Mexican Union of Electricians (SME), located in the center of Cuernavaca.

Rosa María Hernández Trejo, the organizer of this Front, explained that state committees are being created in each state of the country, as happened today in this state, and that the national constitution of said Mexican Imperialist Front for Venezuela will be on February 14th in Mexico City.

Rosa María Hernández Trejo, the organizer of this Front, explained that state committees are being created in each state of the country. Photo: Rubicela Morelos

Meanwhile, the members of this Front called for a mobilization on February 3rd, a global protest to reject the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores, on orders from US President Donald Trump, one month after the United States invaded Venezuela and deprived both Nicolás and Cilia of their freedom.

On February 7th, a national march for Venezuela will be held to demand the release of Maduro and Flores, and marches or rallies will take place in the capitals of each state. “A united front for Venezuela is also a united front for Mexico and for all of Latin America,” emphasized social activist Hernández Trejo.

The post Mexican Anti-imperialist Front in Support of Venezuela Founded in Morelos appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

227
 
 

By Eva Karene Bartlett – Feb 01, 2026

No. This is sensationalism.

I was asked about the following claim:

Sanctions are having a debilitating effect on the Russian population, while the oligarchs are getting rich.”

To claim that the sanctions against Russia are having a “debilitating effect on the population” is sensationalist, ridiculous, and dishonest.

Debilitating is a very strong descriptive and is not accurate to describe the West’s economic war thus far against Russia. Against Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and other countries, absolutely debilitating. Russia? No.

Yes, life would be much easier without sanctions, but people have adapted. Certain foreign items are not available—or if so, more expensive—financial interactions to/from Russia are difficult, but everyday life continues, not destroyed by the sanctions.

I’ve been living in Russia since 2021, before the sanctions ramped up. There hasn’t been a noticeably “debilitating” impact. And note: I don’t live in a Moscow bubble, nor in an expensive or trendy area of Moscow. My observations are not based on being blinded by a glamourous foreigner life. Until last October, I was living quite a ways outside of Moscow, in the countryside. Currently, I’m living in a rural area of Moscow which geographically should be its countryside (the city limits in some areas extend beyond the ring most people know to be Moscow).

I take a 10 minute bus ride to get to the nearest grocery stores and market. While prices/inflation has gone up, so it has too in countries around the world. Life here continues as normal. I can contrast this very well to what I’ve seen in Syria, Venezuela, Gaza (which has been under a very debilitating blockade for over 20 years), and honestly, life is just normal here.

I spent much of 2022 in the Donbass, but I’ve also subsequently visited other Russian cities, including St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Voronezh, Rostov-on-Don, Anapa, cities in Crimea (Yalta, Sevastopol, Simferopol), also quaint touristy areas in the Vladimir region & beyond (Suzdal and Plyos). In the case of Crimea, Suzdal and Plyos, I visited during summer, and the towns and cities, and their restaurants and cafes, were packed with Russian tourists or locals. So was the opera in Novosibirsk, and seaside restaurants and cafes in Anapa. Even in Mariupol, which western media would have you believe is destroyed (and “occupied”), I saw a renewal of life and activity when I was last there (mid 2024), compared to prior years. This included newly opened sidewalk cafes, restaurants, supermarkets, and much money spent on construction, renovation and new projects.

If you went into the centre of Moscow during Christmas and New Years holidays, you saw all the key areas (Red Square and around, VDNK, etc) packed with Russians who were so not debilitated they had money to spend on overpriced drinks and snacks in these touristy areas. Likewise during Maslenitsa, when Russians celebrate the end of winter, gathering in public parks where music and dance performances ensue until the burning of the effigy, and where still more food and drinks are sold, as well as crafts, jewerly, toys, clothing…This is not the activity of a population crushed under sanctions.

However, to be sure I’m not just ill-informed, I asked a number of friends what they thought of the phrase, “the sanctions are having a debilitating effect on the Russian population, while the oligarchs are getting rich.” (For friends who commented publicly, I’ll use their name):

My good friends who also live quite simply and rural, in the Moscow countryside replied: “There has been an increase in prices, the sanctions have made life a little hard, but ‘debilitating’ is insanely exaggerated.”

Another friend, who lives in Moscow, but no where near the centre and not in a bubble: “Not at all, this is false. People have gotten used to the sanctions and adapted.”

A friend in Kursk: “Well the “sanctions”/economic warfare against Russia, have hurt the economy somewhat, but it’s not near what you call “debilitating” obviously, because “debilitating” would mean that the economy is so crippled that it cannot bounce back. But the same sanctions have actually made the Russian economy more self-reliant and thus stronger. Yes the consumer prices keep going up, but I personally (a resident of a 500k population Russian city), don’t see the impact as debilitating as the collective West would want them to be… Of course being relatively close to the borderline, we are experiencing the impacts of the ongoing SMO and Ukrainian terror attacks upon our territories.”

Anatoly Yakovlev, in Moscow: “Well, as we say in Russia, the question is surely interesting. First and foremost, the term ‘debilitating’ is NOT relevant to the nation, which is used to STAND at all church services from 2.5 to 4 hours, as is in the case of the Easter church service. Those who lived as an adult in the 1990s, when times were really very tough and shocking, can confirm that even those 1990s didn‘t put the Russians on their knees. Yes, there is inflation. And wages are rising along with inflation. I know it from numerous friends of mine. So I guess this term and this combination ‘debilitating effect on the Russian population’ can be and is often heard from Russian liberals. They hate Russia, they hate us, the Russians deep inside.

Alexandra: “We don’t give a damn about sanctions. Store shelves are bursting, regions have received incredible tourism development because flying abroad is a hassle with so many layovers. Small and medium businesses have developed very strongly.

And this is coming from me – a basic middle class person.

There is nowhere to park cars because there are so many of them. People are well dressed. And there were no free seats at the opera in the big theater at 11 this morning. It was a matinee, damn it. And all the tiers were packed.”

Andrei: “Oligarchs (or the Western version of “billionaires”, which is just another form of propaganda) – they are billionaires for a reason. They get richer in any country, regardless of the situation.

The question is – do others become poorer at the same time? I don’t see that happening in Russia yet. Sure, there have been some unpleasant recent changes – like the waste collection tax, but overall, people’s lives have improved. I don’t see poverty or even extreme poverty. Maybe it’s worse in remote areas, but those areas are just that – poorer and so on in any country.

Honestly, ordinary Russians don’t give a damn about the sanctions. The only thing that’s annoying is that traveling is harder and everything else is the same. There are goods, the quality is still the same. Many sanctioned products are still available. The fact that some clothing brands are gone – who cares about them?

In general, at the everyday level, an ordinary person will just laugh and say, “Bring it on!” about the sanctions. Traveling is problematic – yes, that’s true. But now they’ve even introduced a visa-free regime with China, so we’ll start traveling more to Asia. Besides, Europe is gradually turning into a cesspool anyway.

Qingyuan Peng, in Nizhny Novgorod: “The inflation is not only due to sanctions. The sanctions as such have negligible influence on my everyday life. I am grateful for the sanctions. They have really curbed American Cultural Imperialism. US brands are out of the lives of ordinary people. I hope the sanctions will last another 10 years. I don’t want any US companies or brands back. None. Maybe even Gen-Z will learn to cope eventually.

Ekaterina Jiritskaya: “We always remember our grandparents who lived in incredibly more difficult conditions during the Great Patriotic War and were able to win. Therefore, we are ashamed of even a minor complaint. What have we lost now? Facebook, which bans for telling the truth? Trips to Europe? But we loved Europe, which supported Dostoevsky, not Bandera, and now it’s strange to leave money there, sponsoring the deaths of civilians in Belgorod or Donbass. We have lost some fashion, auto and computer brands, some booking options, and we have some inflation, but we understand that it is the price for being Russians and being independent.”

Perhaps the most insightful reply (with all respect to those before him), was that of my friend Aleksandr, 42, working at a university in Voronezh:

First, I’d like to show what the average Russian citizen living far from Moscow sees.

From the news, I’ve heard that since 2014, countless sanctions have been imposed on Russia. But, regardless of fluctuations in the currency exchange rate, oil prices, the cost of goods, or any other factors, the availability of goods or services for ordinary people hasn’t decreased. I’m primarily referring to access to healthcare (including dentistry), food, education, and the cost of gas and electricity.

Perhaps development has slowed down, but in my area of the city, since 2022, the largest secondary school in Russia has been built, and a transport interchange for cars has been constructed. This new road was urgently needed because an entire new residential district with kindergartens and a hospital was built. Also, in one part of the city, where I live in Voronezh, about 600 km from Moscow, a huge section of the road is being reconstructed with a new overpass and bridge. Last year, a huge new park was opened, and a beautiful embankment was built on the Voronezh River. And all of this was done since 2022. My mother, a pensioner, still has access to free healthcare. Moreover, she can book an appointment with a specialist doctor, not just a general practitioner, for tomorrow, rather than waiting two months.

My brother, a middle-aged worker at a furniture factory and approaching retirement age, can afford to pay for his son’s university education. My nephew will graduate with a higher education diploma this year. And he doesn’t need a loan for this. Last summer, my brother, his wife, and son went to rest on the Black Sea.

Two parts of Voronezh are separated by a reservoir. After the introduction of visa restrictions to Europe in 2022, domestic tourism has become very popular in our area. People have started exploring the “big water of Voronezh”, so the number of sailing and motor boats has increased significantly. And due to the large number of boats, there are discussions about imposing restrictions on navigation in some parts of the waterway.

And I think that if you ask about what infrastructure projects have been implemented since 2022 in the area of the city where those who claim that there’s an economic crisis in Russia live, they’re unlikely to be able to list a series of positive transformations.

But, I understand why opponents constantly try to prove that the problems in Russia are catastrophic. And this isn’t even an attempt to shift the focus from their own problems to those of their enemies. I think that so-called “Russia experts”, taking advantage of their audience’s lack of knowledge about the basics of the economic system in Russia, present ordinary changes (not always positive ones), such as inflation related to military spending, as something that has a catastrophic impact.

And from the point of view of their readers, these negative changes really do have a catastrophic impact. But the problem is that this assessment is typical of the world and the system in which they live, not of Russia’s economic system.

Firstly, due to numerous sanctions, since 2014, business in Russia has become oriented towards the domestic market, the market associated with Russian defense enterprises, and the Asian market.

Therefore, the level of consumption of Russian residents hasn’t changed much either after 2014 or after 2022.

Moreover, the situation I’ve described is typical for most regions of Russia. Of course, some places are a bit better off, others a bit worse. But overall, the average situation is the same everywhere.

China and Russia Reaffirm Commitment to Cuba

Actually debilitating:
“Debilitating” were the sanctions against Syria which seriously impoverished the people and which made it impossible to import certain vital medications, medical equipment, and more. Over the years, I wrote many times about the sanctions.

In this 2019 article, I wrote, “When I was in Syria last October, a man told me his wife had been diagnosed with breast cancer, but because of the sanctions he couldn’t get her the conventional treatments most in the West would avail of.

In 2016, in Aleppo, before it was liberated of al-Qaeda and co, Dr. Nabil Antaki told me how –because of the sanctions– it had taken him well over a year to get a simple part for his gastroenterology practise.

In 2015, visiting Damascus’ University Hospital where bed after bed was occupied by a child maimed by terrorists’ shelling (from Ghouta), a nurse told me: “We have so many difficulties to ensure that we have antibiotics, specialized medicines, maintenance of the equipment… Because of the sanctions, many parts are not available, we have difficulties obtaining them.”

Visiting a prosthetic limbs factory in Damascus in 2016, I was told that, due to the sanctions, smart technology and 3D scanners –used to determine the exact location where a limb should be fixed– were not available. Considering the over eight years of war and terrorism in Syria, there are untold numbers of civilians and soldiers in need of this technology to simply get a prosthetic limb fixed so they can get on with their lives...”

In a 2020 article, I wrote, “Syria reports that the latest sanctions are already preventing civilians from acquiring “imported drugs, especially antibiotics, as some companies have withdrawn their licenses granted to drug factories,” due to the sanctions. In Damascus, pharmacies I’ve stopped into, when I ask what some of the most sought-after medications are, hypertension medications are at the top…”

“Debilitating” are the sanctions against Venezuela: A 2019 report by the Center for Economic and Policy Researchestimated 40,000 deaths had occurred due to sanctions in 2017-2018.

In 2019, I wrote about my recent time in Venezuela, and the sanctions, noting, a six-year-old boy needing a bone marrow transplant and treatment (provided by an association in agreement with the PDVSA, Venezuela’s oil and natural gas company), diedas a result of his treatment being denied due to US sanctions on PDVSA.

What we are enduring in Russia is NOTHING like the above examples. Yeah, a Lindt chocolate bar which used to cost under 200 rubles now costs 400 rubles or more; other items/brands are not available; but there are plenty of Russian, Chinese, etc, substitutes. Yes, imported cars are super expensive (for someone on my budget).

But that’s not “debilitating”. Such language is used by those with an ulterior motive.

Novosibirsk Opera, 2023 (Note: I didn’t take videos because generally it isn’t allowed. But the opera was packed with well dressed people)

(Substack)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

228
 
 

This editorial by Diego Torres appears as the introduction to the February 2026 issue ofHablemos de Migración*, a newsletter on migration issues published by the Frente Amplio de Mexicanos y Migrantes. We encourage you to subscribe. The English version of the February 2026 issue is available for download.*

To speak of migration in the current context, to declare that global rights are at risk under the Trump administration, might seem like an exaggeration. However,
the facts point in the opposite direction. The systematic violation of norms—legal, political, and ethical—has been a constant throughout his tenure, and this escalation became more visible and alarming after his first term. This issue focuses on that direct relationship: when rights regress, displacement accelerates.

The abuses committed during his time as a businessman cannot be attributed entirely to a single individual: they also stem from a permissive, unequal, and corrupt system that allowed him—like other millionaires—to profit from and abuse the system with impunity. But as President of the United States, the logic shifts: there he tasted the fruits of power with fragile checks and balances, and from that position, he has pursued an agenda that combines arbitrariness, political calculation, and unbridled ambition. His project is no small matter: it rests on the idea of wielding personalistic, almost monarchical, power. And if it is not stopped in time, its consequences could cost the lives and futures of thousands or even millions of people.

During his first term (2017–2021), he faced two impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives. The first was for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress: he was accused of requesting Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, conditioning the delivery of military aid that had already been approved by Congress. The central argument was clear: using his office for personal gain, harming a political adversary, and simultaneously obstructing legislative oversight by not cooperating with the investigation.

The world faces a personalistic, erratic, and dangerous power.

The second impeachment was for inciting insurrection after losing the 2020 election, in the context of the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Actions and speeches before and during that day encouraged thousands of people to attempt to prevent the certification of the election results—that is, to subvert the democratic process and violate his oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.” Even with compelling evidence, he was acquitted in both cases.

And those weren’t the only accusations. His administration was embroiled in numerous allegations that, for various reasons, didn’t pursue their legal course to the end.

One example is Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election: the report documented numerous contacts with Russia; it didn’t establish a criminal conspiracy, but neither did it exonerate the president from possible obstruction of justice. In fact, it presented evidence consistent with a pattern characteristic of his presidency: punishing or removing anyone who didn’t fall in line. The case of then-FBI Director James Comey was emblematic.

The following years were also fraught with scandals and investigations. He faced dozens of charges, including the illegal withholding and concealment of documents related to national defense, obstruction of justice, and making false statements. He was also found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records and held civilly liable for fraudulently inflating the value of his assets to obtain favorable loan and insurance terms. In the realm of sexual matters, the writer E. Jean Carroll sued him for defamation and sexual assault; he was found civilly liable, and the case resulted in a multimillion-dollar settlement.

In his second term, his disregard for the rule of law didn’t wait a single day. Within hours, he signed executive orders, some blatantly unconstitutional. Among them was the pardon of over a thousand people linked to the attack on the Capitol, a politically motivated act of violence that left many dead and dozens wounded. He withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement, reinforcing a narrative of climate change denial. And one of the decisions most clearly contradictory to the Constitution was his attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship, directly conflicting with the 14th Amendment.

Added to this were symbolic and material actions reminiscent of monarchy: even the demolition of the East Wing of the White House, a historic landmark, as if the state were merely an extension of his whims.

Although these measures directly impact American society, the danger extends far beyond. Threats that many dismissed as empty rhetoric or populist promises to seduce a desperate electorate have transformed into real risks. It’s no longer just about rhetoric: the imposition of tariffs as a punitive measure, political blackmail, and open pressure against countries that refuse to comply paint a picture of global instability.

Donald Trump not only violates domestic norms, his conduct spills over into the international order. At home, he enjoys the disciplined support of the Republican Party and, to worsen the situation, the complicity of sectors of the Democratic Party that have yielded on crucial issues: disproportionate budgets for the hunt for migrants, cuts or blockages to essential social programs, and ever-widening margins for military action without effective democratic oversight. On the world stage, the reaction usually remains at the level of statements of rejection: condemnations that sound firm but are ultimately empty, incapable of halting the Trump machine. This was the case with multiple recent crises, such as the genocide in Palestine; it is also the case with the continuation of humanitarian tragedies before an international community that observes, condemns, and ultimately permits, as with the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

If this tsunami of abuses is not stopped, migration will increase in all directions.

Within the United States, many people may be forced to move due to the precariousness of their living conditions, seeking to survive in economic hubs like California or New York—or even in states like Arizona or Texas—following the logic of “migrating to where there are still jobs, services, and opportunities.” Abroad, as long as the structural causes—violence, poverty, inequality, and political crisis persist, migration flows will not decrease. And if the agenda of domination and confrontation escalates, the world may enter a cycle of major conflicts: Russia and China will not remain passive in the face of a United States that seeks to impose its will by force. Imperial competition, militarization, and global destabilization will only produce more poverty, more violence against the most vulnerable, and therefore, more migration.

Incredibly, we are at a historic crossroads: the stability of the world order will depend, to a large extent, on what happens in the coming months. Today, that stability rests in the hands of a man who presents himself as a strong leader but operates as a personalistic, erratic, and dangerous power; someone who combines media-driven senility with political perversity, and who pursues dominance without considering the consequences.

Diego Torres is the founder of El Frente Amplio de Mexicanos y Migrantes, an organization founded in 2022 with the goal of strengthening the unity of the migrant community, contributing to the consolidation of the Fourth Transformation in Mexico’s public life, and advocating for immigration reform in the main migrant-receiving countries; as well as the editor of Hablemos de Migración.

  • Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    Analysis

    Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    On the world stage, the reaction to Trump’s imperialist assault remains at the level of statements of rejection: condemnations that sound firm but are ultimately empty, incapable of halting the Trump machine.

  • Clicks

    News Briefs

    Clicks

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including Mexican oil for Cuba, the Pascual cooperative, negative view of US, Mexican gas dependence, US immigration policy, and Mexico City’s missing Utopias.

  • Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    News Briefs

    Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    The rally condemned US President Trump’s executive order imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba and decried the over 60 year old blockade against the island.

The post Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

229
 
 

Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press on Mexico and Mexican politics.

Why Mexico Must Help Cuba Telesur. Cuba and Mexico share more than geography. They share a history shaped by revolution, resistance, and an enduring insistence on sovereignty in the shadow of powerful neighbors.

Camilo Ocampo, Refrescos Pascual: la cooperativa mexicana que lucha contra las transnacionales Pie de Página. La cooperativa Pascual enfrenta una nueva amenaza: el aumento al IEPS y las restricciones regulatorias ponen en riesgo su viabilidad, mientras revive una historia marcada por la resistencia obrera y la defensa del control colectivo frente a la concentración de la industria refresquera.

Mexicans Have a Negative Perception of the U.S. Since Trump Returned Telesur. The deterioration of the U.S. image is attributed to restrictive policies and military threats.

José Shaddai Olvera Torres, Acto en CDMX reafirma solidaridad con Cuba y Venezuela en el 173 aniversario de José Martí El Chamuco. Los pueblos latinoamericanos deben conocerse y articularse para enfrentar lo que llamó una “guerra mediática” contra los gobiernos de Cuba y Venezuela.

Mateo Crossa, The Shale Revolution, U.S. Energy Imperialism, and Mexico’s Dependence Monthly Review. Nowhere is this fossil-fueled imperial reordering more starkly evident than in the U.S. energy domination over Mexico, a nation once symbolically and politically defined by its postrevolutionary pursuit of energy sovereignty.

Protesta impulsa creación del Frente Antimperialista Resumen Latinoamericano. Los organizadores subrayaron que la creación del frente representa un acto de resistencia y un llamado a la unidad continental frente a las políticas de injerencia. “Es un acto ignominioso de una barbaridad terrible”, expresaron durante la movilización.

María Ramos Pacheco, ‘We don’t have an opinion’: Mexico’s ambassador to the U.S. on Trump’s immigration policy Dallas Morning News. Even though his country does not get involved in U.S. immigration policies, Esteban Moctezuma Barragán said Mexico is committed to providing help and resources for Mexicans who are deported.

Marath Baruch Bolaños López, Secretario del Trabajo y Previsión Social, Trabajo digno en el siglo XXI La Jornada. La Reforma al Trabajo en Plataformas Digitales es innovadora no sólo porque reconoce y atiende una nueva realidad laboral surgida del desarrollo tecnológico, sino también porque se trata de una política pública que nace de un proceso de análisis de la realidad existente y del diálogo con las y los trabajadores y con las empresas.

Jorge Barrera, Tania Miranda Perez, Trump blindsided Mexico with Cuba oil export tariff threat, says Mexican president CBC News. “So this situation may see a break, not just between Mexico and Cuba, but between the Mexico of tomorrow and the Mexico of yesterday.”

Mariana A. Hernández, Diana Leaños y Oscar Nogueda, Las primeras Utopías en la Ciudad de México siguen en construcción, pese a compromiso de construir 16 cada año Animal Politico. A un año de que la jefa de gobierno prometió construir 16 utopías por año, las primeras instalaciones continúan en construcción y sin fecha oficial de terminación.

  • Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    Analysis

    Rights Under Siege: Democratic Crisis & The Risk of a Global Exodus

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    On the world stage, the reaction to Trump’s imperialist assault remains at the level of statements of rejection: condemnations that sound firm but are ultimately empty, incapable of halting the Trump machine.

  • Clicks

    News Briefs

    Clicks

    February 2, 2026February 2, 2026

    Our weekly roundup of stories in the English and Spanish language press including Mexican oil for Cuba, the Pascual cooperative, negative view of US, Mexican gas dependence, US immigration policy, and Mexico City’s missing Utopias.

  • Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    News Briefs

    Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    The rally condemned US President Trump’s executive order imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba and decried the over 60 year old blockade against the island.

The post Clicks appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

230
 
 

This Saturday, Acting President of Venezuela Delcy Rodríguez toured different areas of the Simón Bolívar International Airport in Maiquetía, La Guaira state, to evaluate the progress of works—requested last year by President Nicolás Maduro—being carried out in the country’s main air terminal and to further strengthen commercial air transport.

The inspection was carried out in the company of Transportation Minister Aníbal Coronado, Presidency Office Minister Juan Francisco Escalona, and Communication and Information Minister Miguel Pérez Pirela, as well as airport workers, among other authorities, in order to also verify improvements in the runways and in its vicinity.

Last Thursday, Delcy Rodríguez said that through a telephone conversation she had with US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, they agreed on the cessation of restrictions on Venezuela’s commercial airspace. This would allow new airlines to enter Venezuelan airspace and the resumption of direct Venezuela-US commercial flights.

She emphasized that this dialogue has taken place within the framework of the diplomatic agenda she has maintained with the US government to pave the way for a new stage of exchange and stability under sovereign and mutually beneficial conditions.

The announcement, which resulted from diplomatic dialogue, reaffirms the growing mutual understanding, and will benefit not only Venezuelan and US citizens, but also all those who wish to travel to Venezuela, thus enabling direct and safe travel.

During her statements on Thursday, Rodríguez emphasized that all airlines that suspended operations in Venezuela are welcome to resume operations in the country. So far, TAP Portugal and American Airlines have already announced the resumption of operations, and many more airlines are expected to make similar announcements in the coming days.

Transportation growth
During the tour, the extensive operational capabilities and the large-scale works aimed at enhancing air service in the country was visible. These have also been developed by the Venezuelan government as platforms for economic growth to facilitate local and international investments.

These improvements are under the coordination of the Ministry of Transport, with the objective of developing a modernization plan aimed at offering improved services to travelers and raising the quality standards of the country’s main air terminal.

With the strengthening of the illegal US sanctions against Venezuela, the Simón Bolívar airport was forced to halt air conditioning services in most of its areas, causing significant discomfort to passengers and users.

Many in Venezuela expect that among the improvement work, the air conditioning issue could be resolved, as well as the lack of sufficient migration officers, which causes the international arrival process to be extremely slow and painful for travelers.

Modernizing air transport
These projects will not only have a great positive impact on boosting the transport sector, but also the tourism sector, and in this way promote inbound tourism, which in 2025 closed with a growth of more than 70% compared to 2024.

Venezuela and US Agree To Reopen Commercial Airspace (+Cybersecurity Center)

These works carried out by the Venezuelan government have consisted of constructing the country’s largest runway, capable of accommodating wide-body aircraft. This represents a significant leap forward in the modernization of the various security and control systems installed at the airport; it also marks a transition to a commercial model that will allow economic growth, increased foreign exchange earnings, and, consequently, a broader tourism sector.

Regarding the extensive commercial and hotel network of the area, the Simón Bolívar International Airport is connected to the Gran Cacique Maiquetía Hotel, which is located within its facilities and was recently inaugurated by President Maduro. It offers great advantages for recreation, leisure, for local and international tourists.

(Últimas Noticias) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/JB


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

231
 
 

More explosive accusations from today’s new release of Epstein files. An FBI report from a “credible” and confidential human source says that US president Donald Trump was “compromised by Israel” and that his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, was effectively running his organization and presidency.

The report links Kushner’s family to corruption, Russian cash and the ultra-Zionist Chabad group. It also names Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz as “co-opted by [Israel’s intelligence service] Mossad” to control elite students. Kushner’s father was convicted of financial crimes but then pardoned by Trump.

A Confidential Human Source (CHS) reporting document. Highlighted text on the document reads: "Trump has been compromised by Israel and Kushner is the real brains behind his organization and his Presidency." Photo: X/@GlobeEyeNews.

A Confidential Human Source (CHS) reporting document with highlighted text that reads: “Trump has been compromised by Israel and Kushner is the real brains behind his organization and his Presidency.” Photo: X/@GlobeEyeNews.

Epstein’s status as an Israeli intelligence operative—now beyond reasonable doubt—and ties to his “closest friend” Trump provide a likely means of ‘kompromat’ allegedly making Trump a tool of Israel. The report comes hot on the heels of other released documents detailing witness testimony accusing Trump of raping and beating children provided to him by Epstein. Dershowitz is also accused in the same files of at least being present during the rape—and in at least one case murder—of children.

The CIA, Mossad, and Epstein: Unraveling the Intelligence Ties of the Maxwell Family

The allegations would certainly be borne out by Trump’s willingness to do what Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu demands—particularly the US collaboration in Israel’s Gaza genocide and its heightened belligerence toward Iran, Venezuela and Greenland.

(The Canary)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

232
 
 

This article by Ivan Evair Saldaña originally appeared in the February 1, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premir left wing daily newspaper. Photos by Jay Watts.

Mexico City. Dozens of protesters, convened by the Mexican Movement of Solidarity with Cuba, gathered this Sunday in front of the former United States embassy in Mexico, on Paseo de la Reforma, to condemn President Donald Trump’s decree imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to the island and to demand that the government of Claudia Sheinbaum maintain crude oil shipments to Cuba.

“Mexican oil for the Cubans!” they chanted.

During the event, from a platform and microphone, a statement from the Movement was read denouncing the US president’s decision as a unilateral and extraterritorial measure that violates international law and prolongs the economic blockade in place for more than 60 years, which it described as a systematic policy of suffocation against the Cuban population.

“We denounce this decision as not an isolated incident, but rather the continuation of an economic war waged for over sixty years through the criminal blockade imposed against Cuba. This blockade has caused enormous economic damage, limited access to food, medicine, technology, and financing, and directly and daily affects the civilian population. Due to its systematic, prolonged, and deliberate nature, this policy can and must be called what it is: an act of genocide against the Cuban people,” they stated.

For its part, the Internationalist Group / LIVI criticized the government of President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo for allegedly yielding to the will of the United States.

“In the recent negotiations, for example, regarding the free trade agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the United States, Claudia Sheinbaum has responded quite capitulatingly to Donald Trump’s policy of cutting off oil supplies. As we know, since Maduro’s oil extraction in Venezuela, Mexico became the number one supplier of oil to Cuba. However, now Pemex has also warned that it will cut off oil supplies,” said Sherezada Leyva, a member of the Group.

Furthermore, she accused the Morena government of maintaining a policy subordinate to the United States by allowing military exercises by the Southern Command in the Yucatan Peninsula, which —he said— are aimed towards Cuba, and of reinforcing a restrictive immigration policy in the north of the country through the National Guard.

At the event, the organizations and the José Martí Association of Cuban Residents in Mexico called for strengthening international solidarity, demanding an end to the blockade, and supporting the Cuban people, reiterating that “Cuba is not alone.”

  • Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    News Briefs

    Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    The rally condemned US President Trump’s executive order imposing tariffs on countries that supply oil to Cuba and decried the over 60 year old blockade against the island.

  • Who Will Defend Us?

    Analysis

    Who Will Defend Us?

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    Public officials who are making strategic decisions for the future of our country today must not forget that in the last elections, 36 million citizens elected them to defend our institutions, to defend a sovereign Mexico, and to decisively prevent intervention. We don’t need lukewarm, confusing positions.

  • People’s Mañanera January 30

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera January 30

    January 30, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on reducing violence in Baja California, not sending oil to Cuba, migration, Grupo Salinas tax debt, economic development, and Interoceanic train derailment.

The post Mexico City Protest Demands Mexico Continue Sending Oil to Cuba appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

233
 
 

This editorial by Antonio Gershenson originally appeared in the February 1, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper.

Very well, so we are insisting that we must protect our sovereignty. It is unacceptable that, at this point, given the grievances and outbursts of the irresponsible president of the United States, we should stand idly by and decide whether to fully defend or only partially defend our energy sovereignty.

Here we are, and we will not back down. This is not a pamphlet; it is a slogan, but it is also the truth. This man—or rather, this abject president—has trampled, chewed up, and spat out pieces of sovereignty, not only of Mexico but also of our sister nations in Latin America.

Let’s not allow it to continue. How are we going to stop it? We need to devise several plans, one of which is to remain steadfast in defending our natural resources.

Apparently, he is no longer interested in Venezuela’s oil; the issue of his incongruous and aggressive activity against all countries is about power and the fact of saying “I’m in charge here”.

Perhaps President Trump knows his days are numbered, and that’s why he’s tightening the screws, that military clamp that can strangle anyone, even the most prepared, not only from a military point of view, but also economically and politically speaking.

This man—or rather, this abject president—has trampled, chewed up, and spat out pieces of sovereignty, not only of Mexico but also of our sister nations in Latin America.

So, let’s review what we’re doing within the 4T government. How should we behave? We are supposedly following the principles of “don’t steal, don’t lie, and don’t betray the people.” In this sense, Mexican institutions have the responsibility to defend Mexicans and their energy sovereignty and, where appropriate, to denounce attacks against the movement for transformation, or against the democracy we are rebuilding.

If this defense by the Mexican government is not happening in reality, if behind national institutions such as the Ministry of Economy, the Ministry of Energy, the Federal Electricity Commission, and Petróleos Mexicanos, those enclaves of capitalism, neoliberalism, and the whole host of corrupt individuals who have ruined our country’s economy are still hidden, then let’s ask ourselves, what is happening?

We therefore have the right to know and review the decisions being designed and implemented in offices like Marcelo Ebrard’s, or any other. Let’s remember that government agencies are not entirely free of neoliberal practices and ideology, despite the arrival of the Fourth Transformation (4T). Many decision-makers will continue to bury their heads in the sand, throwing stones and hiding their hands, contrary to the principles of dignity, justice, and Mexican humanism championed by this government.

In this regard, it is imperative to review who holds the strategic decision-making power for the defense of our resources and our country as a whole. There can be no pretense or irresponsible, ignorant, or politically and socially insensitive attitudes, as we have discussed on other occasions in this opinion column.

The public officials who are making strategic decisions for the future of our country today must not forget that in the last elections, 36 million citizens elected them to defend our institutions, to defend a sovereign Mexico, and to decisively prevent intervention. We don’t need lukewarm, confusing positions that fail to provide clarity about what is really happening to our country in the international arena, but we also don’t want unnecessary unilateral grandstanding.

We need certainty regarding the positions and definitions that will be adopted in the upcoming USMCA negotiations, among other future agreements, which must align with the commitments that President Claudia Sheinbaum’s current administration has made to millions of Mexicans. And if the treaty ultimately disappears, it won’t be a tragedy; it would be the beginning of true economic independence, which is what we desperately need.

For Trump we appear irrelevant, but in truth, without Mexico’s support, the United States will have problems.

We insist that we need economic certainty, political certainty, and social stability. Without these components, we cannot speak of a just, productive, and developed society, because we will always be on the defensive against neoliberals.

  • Who Will Defend Us?

    Analysis

    Who Will Defend Us?

    February 1, 2026February 1, 2026

    This editorial by Antonio Gershenson originally appeared in the February 1, 2026 edition of La Jornada, Mexico’s premier left wing daily newspaper. Very well, so we are insisting that we must protect our sovereignty. It is unacceptable that, at this point, given the grievances and outbursts of the irresponsible president of the United States, we…

  • People’s Mañanera January 30

    Mañanera

    People’s Mañanera January 30

    January 30, 2026

    President Sheinbaum’s daily press conference, with comments on reducing violence in Baja California, not sending oil to Cuba, migration, Grupo Salinas tax debt, economic development, and Interoceanic train derailment.

  • Debt on the Installment Plan: Salinas Pliego Pays $10B MXN; $22B in Installments

    News Briefs

    Debt on the Installment Plan: Salinas Pliego Pays $10B MXN; $22B in Installments

    January 30, 2026

    The ultra-right winger and tax evader fumes, but begins to pay his debt piece-by-piece, but with less punitive measures than his Grupo Elektra receives.

The post Who Will Defend Us? appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

234
 
 

US diplomat Laura Dogu arrived in Caracas as the US government’s envoy to Venezuela, part of the agenda between the governments of the two countries to establish a roadmap on matters of mutual interest and to address differences through diplomatic dialogue in accordance with international law.

The foreign affairs minister of Venezuela, Yván Gil, reported on Saturday, January 31, that US diplomat Laura Dogu had arrived in Caracas, landing at Simón Bolívar International Airport in Maiquetía, La Guaira state.

He added that the agenda includes addressing and resolving existing differences through diplomatic dialogue and on the basis of mutual respect and international law.

For its part, the US Embassy in Venezuela posted on its social media accounts a photograph of Dogu deboarding from the plane at the Simón Bolívar International Airport, along with a message from the diplomat, “I just arrived in Venezuela. My team and I are ready to work.”

Recently, the Trump administration announced the appointment of Laura Dogu as its new chief of mission for the US External Office for Venezuela that functions from Bogotá, Colombia. The information was released on the US Embassy’s website.

Laura Dogu is a career diplomat who has served in Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras, in addition to serving as a Foreign Policy Advisor to the US Army Chief of Staff and as Deputy Director of the FBI’s Foreign Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell.

Venezuela and United States have not had formal diplomatic relations since February 2019, when the US government recognized the self-proclaimed “interim president” of Venezuela, Juan Guaidó and launched a total blockade against the country. At that time, Venezuela severed diplomatic relations with Washington and the US embassy in Caracas was closed. It remains closed to this day, and the US maintains an “External Office for Venezuela” in the capital of Colombia.

US Labor Independence and Solidarity with Venezuela

On January 16, 2026, the acting president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, announced the undertaking of a bilateral cooperation agenda with the United States as part of an “exploratory mission” to investigate conditions for resuming formal diplomatic relations with the US, which she said was part of President Nicolás Maduro’s agenda. She stated that Venezuela would embrace this relation without fear and reiterated the country’s willingness to move forward into an era of mutual respect.

Rodríguez specified that the diplomatic and economic agenda would prioritize cooperation in strategic sectors such as energy, trade, and finance, with a vision strictly oriented toward the well-being of the Venezuelan people, and based on balance and reciprocity.

On January 27,  she confirmed the establishment of diplomatic channels with the US government and a work agenda based on dialogue and mutual respect.

“We have proposed that our differences be resolved through diplomatic dialogue,” she said, and at the same time underscoring Venezuela’s sovereign stance: “The people of Venezuela do not accept orders from any foreign power.”

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/SC/DZ


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

235
 
 

The US Department of Justice has released millions of new documents linked to the case of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, before removing some pages that contained complaints mentioning US President Donald Trump.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said on Friday, January 30, that approximately 3.5 million files were published to comply with the Epstein Transparency Act, following criticism that the administration had missed a December 19 deadline set by Congress.

The documents include FBI communications and complaints submitted as tips, some of which list comments mentioning Trump and others who had social or professional ties to Epstein.

Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in relation to his past association with Epstein.

Pages removed from DOJ website
After their publication, pages containing complaints that mentioned Trump were removed from the DOJ website and now return a “page not found” message. Copies of the documents, however, have circulated widely on social media. CNN anchor Jake Tapper was among those who publicly noted that the pages had been taken down.

One complaint, filed by a friend of a victim, says Trump forced a girl aged 13-14 to perform “oral sex” approximately 35 years ago in New Jersey. The document states that an investigator was sent to Washington to conduct an interview.

Another complaint says Trump regularly paid an individual to perform sexual acts and adds that he was present when her newborn child was murdered by a relative. The paperwork notes that there was “no contact made” with the complainant.

A separate complaint, which provided no contact information, said “calendar girls” parties at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago involved children and sexual abuse. The document also names several public figures as present at such events.

In another account, a complainant said that they witnessed a “sex trafficking ring” at Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, in the mid-1990s. The person noted “threats” from Trump’s head of security if she spoke publicly about what she had seen.

Secret Behind Jeffrey Epstein’s Mysterious Wealth Reportedly Disclosed Amid Sex Trafficking Probe

Bill Gates mentioned in the files
The latest release also includes a draft email Epstein wrote to himself in 2013, referring to Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. In the message, Epstein said Gates asked him to delete emails and referenced “personal matters.”

The DOJ has not provided a detailed explanation for why certain pages were removed after publication. The department said the document release was ongoing.

(PressTV)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

236
 
 

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel condemned in the strongest terms the imposition by the US government of an absolute blockade on fuel supplies to the island in order to asphyxiate its people and its economy.

On Friday, January 30, the Cuban president shared and endorsed his government’s declaration condemning the executive order of the US president that, with the narrative of a “national emergency” for the United States, intends to cut off the global oil trade with Cuba.

“The Trump administration is consolidating a dangerous way of conducting its country’s foreign policy through force and exercising its ambitions to protect its imperialist hegemony,” Díaz-Canel wrote on social media.

Condenamos en los términos más enérgicos la nueva escalada del gobierno de los Estados Unidos contra #Cuba, en su empeño por imponer un cerco absoluto a los suministros de combustible a nuestro país.https://t.co/V1W59wWcXG

1/4

— Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez (@DiazCanelB) January 31, 2026

The Cuban head of state pointed out that, with this measure, the United States is abrogating to itself a right that does not belong to it. “As announced, that country is claiming the right to dictate to sovereign states which nations they can trade with and which ones can export their national products,” he stated.

“We will face this new onslaught with firmness, equanimity, and the certainty that reason is absolutely on our side. The decision is clear: Homeland or Death! We will prevail!” Díaz-Canel declared.

At the Special Plenary of the Communist Party of Cuba in Havana, President Díaz-Canel outlined part of the strategy to confront the “fascist and genocidal” US threats and aggression.

He reaffirmed that Cuba will not surrender to the new US measure seeking to block fuel supplies and announced an “international emergency,” calling for solidarity against the Trump regime’s “criminal act.” “Even with a fuel blockade, Cuba will not be defeated by the empire,” he declared.

The Cuban leader added that his nation is a country of peace, and even amid aggression and a blockade for more than six decades, there is the capacity and willingness to dialogue with the US government. “But that dialogue cannot be under pressure; it has to be under conditions of equality and respect, without pre-conditions,” he emphasized.

“We have nothing against the US people,” he continued. “On the contrary, as we have always said, the Cuban people and the US people are being deprived of so much in their potential cultural, research, scientific, sporting, and educational relations because of the restrictive policies imposed by the blockade on everyone.”

The Cuban president further pointed out that the new measure against Cuba falls within a pattern of imperialist conduct that also includes Greenland and Iran, and called the Trump doctrine “a criminal policy of contempt that aims to take over the world.”

He called upon the people of Cuba to fight, create, transform, combat, and share the results. “We will not be intimidated, and we are certain that we will not be alone as we face this aggression from the United States,” he said, reaffirming the conviction to defend the homeland, the revolution, and socialism.

His statements came in response to a US executive order issued on January 29, which represents an extreme expansion of the economic, commercial, and financial blockade against Cuba by attempting to cut off one of its most vital oil supply lines through coercion of third countries, threatening them with sanctions if they sell oil to Cuba.

ALBA-TCP condemns US actions against Cuba
The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America – People’s Trade Treaty (ALBA-TCP) categorically condemned the new US actions against Cuba as a violation of international free trade norms and the sovereign prerogatives of each state.

On Friday, the Alliance released a statement labeling the US oil blockade as “part of the historical policy of economic, commercial, and financial blockade against Cuba that seeks to subject an entire people to extreme living conditions.”

ALBA-TCP maintained that, “Far from breaking the Cuban people, these actions, which have been repeatedly and almost unanimously condemned by the international community, have demonstrated the resilience, dignity, and resolve of a nation that defends its independence and its right to build its own political, economic, and social project, free from external interference, threats, and aggression.”

The Alliance reaffirmed that solidarity, cooperation, and unity of the peoples will remain stronger than any unilateral coercive measure.

Calls Mount for FIFA World Cup Boycott Amid US Rights Abuses

The full text of the statement follows:

The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) categorically rejects the recent executive order of the President of the United States that seeks to impose a total blockade on fuel supplies to the Republic of Cuba, under the threat of applying arbitrary tariffs against countries that maintain legitimate trade relations with Cuba, in violation of international free trade norms, as well as the sovereign prerogatives of each State.

This action, part of the historical policy of economic, commercial, and financial blockade against Cuba, seeks to subject an entire people to extreme living conditions. Far from breaking the Cuban people, these actions, which have been repeatedly and almost unanimously condemned by the international community, have demonstrated the resilience, dignity, and resolve of a nation that defends its independence and its right to build its own political, economic, and social project, free from external interference, threats, and aggression.

The ALBA member countries express their solidarity and support for the Government and people of Cuba, and reiterate their firm commitment to International Law and the Charter of the United Nations, as well as to the defense of multilateralism, fair trade, and unrestricted respect for the sovereignty of peoples.

ALBA reaffirms that solidarity, cooperation, and unity of the peoples will remain stronger than any unilateral coercive measure.

Caracas, January 30, 2026

(Telesur) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/SC


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

237
 
 

US President Donald Trump tells India to stop purchasing Iranian oil and buy Venezuelan crude instead.


From Presstv via This RSS Feed.

238
 
 

By Caitlin Johnstone  –  Jan 29, 2026

It flabbergasts them that I’m not saying harsh things about the latest Official Bad Guy of the Day.

Reading by Tim Foley:

Any time things heat up with an empire-targeted government I always get people demanding to know why I’m not critical of that government.

“Why don’t you criticize Iran? You spend all your time criticizing the west and Israel; you’re a hypocrite if you don’t criticize Iran.”

It flabbergasts them that I’m not saying harsh things about the latest Official Bad Guy of the Day. Everyone on TV is criticizing Iran. Both mainstream political parties are criticizing Iran. Their favorite mainstream political podcasters and online pundits are criticizing Iran. So why isn’t Caitlin Johnstone criticizing Iran? There must be something nefarious and treasonous about her.

It never occurs to them that a principled individual might prioritize opposing the abuses of the power structure they actually live under and can actually exert some influence upon, rather than impotently shouting at a foreign “regime” who has nothing to do with them.

It never occurs the them that the only reason we’re hearing so much about the Official Bad Guy of the Day is because the US is ramping up aggressions on the targeted country, and the imperial media are manufacturing consent for those hostilities.

‘No Two-Hour War’: Iran Vows Immediate Retaliation to Any US or Israeli Aggression

It never occurs to them that this frenzied propaganda campaign is the main reason the Official Bad Guy of the Day has been on their mind so much.

It never occurs to them to question who actually benefits from the western population chanting “IRAN BAD! REGIME MUST GO!” in unison like a bunch of animatronic theme park animals while the drums of war are beating louder and louder.

It never occurs to them that someone can simply oppose the warmongering agendas of the US empire on principle, because those agendas are reliably disastrous and the US empire is the most tyrannical power structure on earth.

These things never occur to them because most westerners spend their entire lives in a propaganda echo chamber which constantly feeds them stories about how evil the western empire’s enemies are, while telling them almost nothing about the empire’s own abuses.

The average westerner is not even aware that they live in an empire. The typical Australian thinks “I’m over here in my own separate, sovereign country, and the United States is another country over there doing their own thing, and also Israel is another independent country doing their own thing over there, and likewise with the UK and EU and New Zealand and Canada, and ever other country I’ve been taught to think favorably of.”

In reality they’re all member states of a giant globe-spanning power structure which functions more or less as a single empire with regard to foreign policy. And they work together to subvert, undermine and eventually devour the nations we’ve all been trained to hate.

The western press do not criticize this power structure. Westerners do not learn about it in school. They don’t know it exists, so it never occurs to them that it is something that can be justifiably criticized and opposed.

You don’t see the western press criticizing the US-centralized western empire. You don’t even see them criticizing the United States as a whole. You’ll see them publish criticisms of individual presidents, politicians or political parties, but you hardly ever see them talking about the behavior of the abusive warmongering, militarism, economic warfare and surveillance systems which persist from administration to administration regardless of who happens to be in office.

This is why it’s so baffling to a westerner to see another westerner criticizing western warmongering instead of the Official Bad Guy of the Day. They don’t normally encounter such criticisms. They haven’t been trained to expect it. All they’ve been trained to expect is criticism of Tehran, Putin, Hamas, Maduro, or whoever the empire happens to be angriest at on any given day. So any divergence from their conditioned expectations looks strange and suspicious to them. It looks like something bad is happening.

But it is not a sign that something bad is happening for a westerner to focus their criticism on the western empire. It’s a sign that something bad is happening that so few westerners ever do.

I don’t criticize Iran because I do not want to feed into an imperial war propaganda campaign for a horrific agenda that I do not support. I want to focus my criticisms on the power structure under which I actually live, because that is what one does when one is not a groveling bootlicker, and because the power structure under which I live happens to be the most abusive tyrant on the world stage.

(Caitlin Johnstone)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

239
 
 

By Wayne Kublalsingh  –  Jan 29, 2026

Many of our Trinidad and Tobago (T&T) officials are casting a long eye on Venezuela’s crude. But the Kamla Persad-Bissessar government has a rap sheet of wrongs against the Bolivarian Republic. With this rap sheet, how are we getting Venezuelan crude again?

On 23rd January 2019, Donald Trump posted the following on social media: “Today, I am officially recognizing the President of the Venezuelan National Assembly, Juan Guaidó, as the Interim President of Venezuela.” Two days later, Mrs Persad-Bissessar, the then Leader of the Opposition rose in Parliament to effusively announce, “We’re preparing to join with the Venezuelan people and the free world in recognising Juan Guaidó as the interim president of Venezuela.” 

No sooner had Trump spoken than the current PM rose to parrot his words. The US instigated an uprising to have the Bolivarian revolution replaced by Guaidó. The uprising failed. This was the first attempt by our PM to hitch herself to the Trump bandwagon for regime change in Venezuela. Like Trump, she invoked the China and Russian threat in Venezuela, and over T&T skies. Trump: “I told China and Russia that we don’t want to see them in Venezuela.” 

When the US deployed a full-fledged naval force North of Venezuela in August 2025, Persad-Bissessar declared her government’s full support. She referred to the Bolivarian government as “the Maduro regime”, as “narco-terrorists”. She broke ranks with CARICOM and CELAC in support of Trump. She categorically denied that the US fleet had any plans for regime change in Venezuela – it was all about narcotics busting. On January 3rd, the US forces invaded Venezuela, killed one hundred persons, including thirty-two Cubans, destroyed homes and military infrastructure, and kidnapped President Maduro and his wife, Dr Celia Flores. A decapitation exercise. The PM was plainly wrong. She lied or misled or deceived herself. 

Relatives of Civilians Killed in US Caribbean Missile Strikes Sue Trump Administration

In September 2025, when US troops began the extrajudicial killing of Venezuelan, Colombian and Trinidad citizens, she declared: “May God bless and protect the members of the US military…The US military should kill them all violently.” No interdiction, no search, no verification, no arrest, no case, no court, no charge or conviction. More than one hundred persons have since been killed. 

In December 2025, a Colombian family, assisted by the Colombia President, filed a complaint before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). It named US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth as the perpetrator, claiming that he “was responsible for ordering the bombing of boats like those of Alejandro Carranza Medina and the murder of all those on such boats.” It also claims that Hegseth’s conduct was “ratified” by US President Donald Trump (CNN).

On 27th January, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a case in the US on behalf of two Trinidadians. It claims: “On October 14, 2025, the United States government authorized and launched a missile strike that killed Chad Joseph and Rishi Samaroo…These premeditated and intentional killings—carried out outside of the context of armed conflict and in circumstances where targeted individuals do not pose a concrete, specific, and immediate threat of grave harm—violate domestic law prohibiting murder and international law prohibiting extrajudicial killing, or the arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of the right to life. (Burnley v. US: Demanding Accountability on Caribbean Boat Strikes). 

What our PM callously impugned, the lives of our citizens, the ACLU has deemed sacred and taken legal responsibility for. The ACLU seems more Trini To De Bone than our PM. 

On 25th October 2025, the National Assembly of Venezuela declared that Persad-Bissessar was no longer welcome in Venezuela, having been declared “Persona Non Grata”, condemning her government for its support of the United States. On 25th November, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine arrived in Trinidad to meet with the PM. Gradually, we learnt that our PM had afforded the US our maritime, land and air space for its operations in Venezuela. 

She afforded them Crown Point in Tobago to erect a radar in support of these operations. She permitted the US use of our airports at Crown Point and Piarco for the refuelling and landing of aircraft. We know for sure now that these operations involved the kidnapping of Maduro and his wife, a decapitation exercise. Such kidnapping constitutes an act of war. Extrajudicial “kinetic” and “double tap” strikes, as they are euphemistically called, constitute murder. 

Today, Trump is seizing Venezuelan oil tankers and confiscating the oil. He has claimed for himself authority for who gets to drill in Venezuela. He has blockaded Venezuela. He is using the Venezuelan example to threaten both Cuba and Iran. Unabashedly, with impunity, he has unleashed his full-fledged imperialist fangs. 

Our PM has granted tacit support to Trump and his decapitation, forced transfer and imprisonment of the Venezuelan President and First Lady. Whatever her subjective delusions might be, objectively, she has aligned with imperialism. She has put imperialism, Trump, before the interests of Trinidad and Tobago and Venezuela. She has sold our sovereignty to Trump. She has rendered our Republic a vassal, by choice. And has unbolted latches for the US to force vassalage on our pre-Kamla energy-cooperative neighbour. 

Twice, in 2019 and 2026, our PM has called the US, like any US imperialist or puppet would, the “leader of the free world.” Why would the Venezuelan government want a hardcore US puppet as a cross-border gas-field partner? Or risk betrayal again? Or risk the chance of proceeds from its own crude being weaponized to undermine its economy and sovereignty? 

WK/OT


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

240
 
 

By Camila Escalante  –  Jan 29, 2026

At least 15 nations scheduled to participate in the World Cup face U.S. travel bans and visa restrictions, as ICE abductions, disappearances and killings continue.

International calls to boycott the US-hosted FIFA World Cup 2026 are increasing in response to widespread U.S. human rights violations domestically and Washington’s atrocities and malign activities abroad.

Former FIFA President Sepp Blatter has become the latest prominent voice to echo calls for football fans to boycott World Cup matches in the United States as the world witnesses public executions-gone-viral in Minneapolis and mass-scale repression and raids by masked agents on U.S. workplaces and homes. Blatter’s remarks follow the likes of UK MPs, a leading German soccer official, and sports columnists.

The U.S. invasion and terror attack in Venezuela and the abduction of President Maduro and Cilia Flores in early January triggered a new wave of concern over Washington’s accelerated plans to launch military attacks against Cuba, Nicaragua, Colombia, Mexico, Iran, Greenland and Canada. In Caracas, there’s even talk in support of an outright boycott of U.S. products.

Eleven of the 16 cities selected by the Federation to host the matches are in the United States (Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City, Los Angeles, Miami, New Jersey, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle), in a tournament that is being promoted as jointly hosted with Canada and Mexico. The U.S. will host 78 matches, while Canada and Mexico each prepare to host just 13 matches, beginning June 11.

Sport Scholars for Justice in Palestine will be hosting a town hall to hear from movement organizations and activists regarding the boycott, alongside Scottish Sport for Palestine, NOlympics LA, No Team Israel at the Davis Cup, Irish Sport for Palestine, and Black Alliance for Peace.

The North-South Project for People(s)-Centered Human Rights published a video urging organizations and people of conscience to demand that FIFA move the matches out of the United States. The North-South Project, part of The Black Alliance for Peace (BAP), has also circulated a petition calling on both FIFA and the IOC to ban the United States and Israel from hosting or participating in international sporting events.

“Allowing the U.S. to host the World Cup or any other international games would be an affront to the victims of U.S. lawlessness and its support for an ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people,” according to Ajamu Baraka, director of the BAP’s North-South Project.

Baraka continues, “The U.S. is an unsafe and illegitimate host. FIFA’s own statutes commit it to respecting internationally recognized human rights, yet allowing the U.S. to host. At the same time, it enables genocide, military aggression, racialized repression, and the mass criminalization of migrants, normalizing and legitimizing these crimes. In doing so, FIFA becomes complicit.”

U.S. non-profit CodePink is also demanding that FIFA move the games, citing the U.S. bombings of Nigeria and Venezuela.

Football journalist Nima Tavallaey Roodsari was among the early voices to argue that U.S. travel bans imposed during Trump’s first term—disproportionately targeting citizens of Muslim-majority and African countries—should automatically disqualify the U.S. from hosting. He’s joined by a growing number of sports journalistssports content creators and podcasters sounding the alarm over travel to the U.S.

Leftwing Intellectuals and Artists Want Brazil To Stop Buying Weapons From Israel

Various forms of visa processing have been frozen for at least 15 of the World Cup qualified nations—nearly a third of participating teams. Citizens of Iran are subject to a blanket suspension of visas, with no guarantees for travel to the U.S. for Iranian players, coaches and staff, let alone fans. Haiti, whose national team qualified for the World Cup from Concacaf, is also among the 12 countries whose citizens face a full U.S. travel ban.

FIFA, under the leadership of President Gianni Infantino, invented a FIFA Peace Prize for the purpose of bestowing the award to Donald Trump, as U.S. massacres and extrajudicial killings in the Caribbean and Pacific hit the three month mark. The award drew criticism of sports broadcasters and pundits.

Infantino made multiple visits to the White House in 2025 to meet with Trump, beginning with Trump’s welcoming of Infantino to his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida as part of a series of pre-inaugural events. The Trump-Infantino relationship spans years, with the U.S. president inviting the FIFA president to give an opening speech at a Trump-hosted dinner at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2020.

President Trump speaks with FIFA President Gianni Infantino during the Global Chief Executive Officers dinner at the World Economic Forum in Davos

President Trump speaks with FIFA President Gianni Infantino during the Global Chief Executive Officers dinner at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on January 21, 2020.

Israeli firm International Security & Defense Systems (ISDS) has provided services to at least four World Cups; Mexico (1986), Italy (1990), South Africa (2010) and Russia (2018). NoOlympics LA explains How The Olympics and World Cup Help Fuel Israeli War Crimes in Palestinewith event security schemes run by former Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) soldiers and Mossad agents.

While the U.S. utilizes Mossad and IOF for domestic event security, the Department of Homeland Security has confirmed its overseas deploymentof U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during the 2026 Winter Olympic Games in Italy.

European objection to the U.S. hosted tournament is becoming louder each day. In The Netherlands, a petition to boycott, launched by Dutch broadcaster Teun van de Keuken, has amassed 156,000 signatures. The petition calls on the Dutch government to not allow the Dutch national football team to participate in the World Cup in the United States: “We do not want our footballers to implicitly support President Donald Trump’s violent terror policy against innocent migrants..”

Calls to boycott the 2026 FIFA World Cup have also come from tournament co-host, Mexico, where protests against U.S. meddling are being organized. Organizations and activists are urging a boycott of U.S. chains that finance wars. An op-ed in one of Mexico’s leading newspapers calls FIFA, “a cubil of millionaire thieves”, which ought to be outright banned as a sports authority.

Global backlash over ticket prices forced FIFA to created a limited “Supporter Entry Tier” price category in December. Even still, this year’s World Cup will be the most expensive, and least accessible to football fans, in history.

Protests are expected in the 11 U.S. host cities.

(Kawsachun News)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

241
 
 

By Aaron Kirshenbaum  –  Jan  29, 2026

Early on Saturday, January 3rd, Venezuela was attacked on behalf of oil, mineral, tech, and weapons profiteers in a regime change operation. Since then, the Trump administration has threatened Iran, Greenland, Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico. What unites these threats? The U.S.’s quest for endless resource extraction to power its increasingly deadly global empire. And it’s not slowing down. These resource wars and “operations” are emerging as the AI drive also ramps up. In July, Palantir and the Pentagon signed a 10-year, $10 billion agreement. In April 2025, Palantir won a $30 million contract with ICE — a significant development in their decade-plus-long partnership that we are now seeing play out in their increasingly militarized, unrestrained murders and abductions in Minneapolis and around the country. This increasingly inextricable partnership between AI and the war economy is throwing us into a fast track of climate and environmental chaos that threatens us all.

In August, I learned about an AI program created by the U.S.-armed Israeli military called “Where’s Daddy.” The program is designed to track individuals Israel is targeting in order to kill them at home with their families. In October 2023, the AI war giant Palantir entered into a contract with the Israeli military. Since 2021, the Israeli Occupation Forces have been working with tech companies like Google on AI programs such as Project Nimbus, used to surveil and murder Palestinians. “Where’s Daddy” and other overlapping systems represent the newest phase of this. The program characterizes the families of these alleged combatants as “collateral damage” and is often far from accurate, killing entire families without the “intended targets” even being there. The tech companies developing these programs do not have anyone’s “safety” or “security” in mind; they are solely motivated by profit. This cruelty is no surprise— these companies are the same ones building toxic data centers across the U.S., largely in working-class and Black and Brown communities, in the newest phase of environmental injustice.

We’ve been hearing about AI more and more as it enters the commercial market in increasingly pervasive ways. In particular, much has been reported about AI data centers entering communities and the opposition to them. Many of these fights have been taken up by environmental organizations; it’s estimated that data centers could consume approximately 21% of global energy by 2030. In order to sustain this energy use, data centers need cooling. Mid-sized data centers use as much water as a city of 50,000 people. Meta’s Hyperion data center in Louisiana is projected to use as much water as the entire city of New Orleans. Another Meta center in Cheyenne, Wyoming, is projected to use more power than the state of Wyoming itself.

These centers not only increase electricity bills for communities that can’t afford them, but they also generate significant air, water, and noise pollution. Some centers regularly use diesel “emergency” generators to meet increased demand. Each generator is the size of a railcar, and thousands are littered across data center hotspots like Northern Virginia. As a result, toxic chemicals are seeping into the lungs of residents, causing asthma and long-term illness. Data centers are known to create noise pollution, with constant hums that can lead to hearing loss, anxiety, cardiovascular stress, and a host of other long-term issues. Furthermore, equipment is certain to break down and lead to toxic waste and electronic pollution.

“Critical” minerals are required for the operation of these data centers. The process of obtaining these minerals, supposedly also used for green technology, requires the militarization, destabilization, and total plunder of mineral-rich regions. These minerals are supposedly “critical” for energy transitions, and some have advocated more “sustainable” methods for maintaining data centers through “green” technologies.

The use of these minerals is clear: The Pentagon recently became the largest shareholder in MP Minerals, one of the largest mining companies in the Western Hemisphere. Why? Aluminum for fighter jets. Titanium for missiles. And copper, lithium, cobalt, and many others for data center batteries and semiconductors. The more data centers are built, the more minerals are needed. This process of extraction has murdered millions in the Congo, destroying the soil, water, and forest: one of the largest “lungs” of the planet. It has led to the newest phase of imperialist aggression on Venezuela, a mineral-rich country with the largest oil reserves in the world (oil, of course, is also essential for data centers). Additionally, it has led to the attempted subordination of the Philippines to semiconductor production. The U.S. also seeks to use the archipelago as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” for the U.S.’s looming war with China, its largest competitor in the AI and mineral race.

These are the impacts we already know to be devastating. But this is also new technology, which means there’s a lot we don’t know and a lot that’s being intentionally hidden. Lack of transparency is the norm in this industry. As data centers rapidly expand and buy up land around the country, the actual companies behind them hide behind non-disclosure agreements. This is not dissimilar to the intentional concealment of the military’s role in global emissions, enacted through U.S. pressure at the third U.N. Climate Change Conference in 1997. Decades later, the issue of militarism is still left out of climate conversations.

The parallel makes sense, considering how the AI industry has fused with the war machine. The U.S. military is one of the most environmentally destructive forces on the planet. In its oil consumption alone, the U.S. military is the world’s largest institutional polluter. The U.S.’s 800+ bases in 80 countries globally are known to regularly leak jet fuel and cancer-causing PFAS chemicals, along with a toxic cocktail of hundreds of other chemicals. While training exercises like RIMPAC in the Asia-Pacific region authorize the deaths of thousands of sea creatures, in environmental sacrifice zones like Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, toxic waste from military facilities has killed infants hours after birth. In bomb testing sites like Vieques, off the coast of mainland Puerto Rico, lung cancer and bronchitis rates have been shown to be 200% higher than on the mainland for men, and 280% for women. And the oil-motivated “war on terror” emitted 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide from 2001-2017.

The Genocide in Palestine Is Powered by Zionism, Not “AI”

Now we are entering a new era of resource wars that will further destroy the planet as the AI race with China accelerates. The relationship between AI and the U.S. military goes beyond the Pentagon’s contracts with Palantir, Meta, and Microsoft: last June, executives Shyam Sankar (Palantir), Andrew Bosworth (Meta), Kevin Well (OpenAI), and Bob McGrew (Thinking Machines Lab, previously OpenAI) were sworn into the U.S. Army as lieutenant colonels. Michael Obadal, executive of the AI-war manufacturing company Anduril, is now the Under Secretary of the U.S. Army, still with hundreds of thousands in Anduril stock. Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir, is himself a major funder of Anduril. In June 2025, OpenAI, Google, xAI, and Anthropic entered into $200 million contracts with the Department of War. The more you look at the partnerships between such companies and their executives, the Pentagon, governmental departments, and other entities, the more tangled this military-tech-industrial complex all becomes.

Many organizing groups are rightfully building power against the data centers that literally fuel it all, pushing for increased regulation and transparency. At the same time as Palantir makes new deals with the Pentagon, regulations in sacrifice zones are being thrown out the window. On December 18th, the House of Representatives passed a bill backed by Microsoft, Micron, and OpenAI to fast-track data centers. The bill significantly reduces the number of environmental and financial factors that can be considered in permitting processes. It’s simple. These communities are becoming the Camp Lejeunes of a new age: the new toxic waste dumps in the belly of the beast used to power the war machine. They must be fought against at all costs.

Regulation is crucial. It’s also far from a long-term solution. There is a lot that we don’t know, because a lot is hidden: just how much of these companies are tied up with weapons manufacturers, the Pentagon, and proxies like Israel; the environmental destruction caused by military usage of AI; the specific usage of all of these data centers. But it is obvious that AI is becoming inseparable from war-making, that increased AI means increased war-making, and that increased war-making is resulting in new and increased forms of unfathomable environmental destruction to communities around the world and here within the belly of the beast.

AI has been creeping up our necks. The horrific “Where’s Daddy” program existed long before I heard of it. It seems like these products are popping up in every corner of the market before we can even start discussing them. Their emergence has been intentionally designed to not only conceal their role in environmental destruction, but also their role in the militarism destroying communities from Virginia to Gaza.

No part of this is sustainable — not the war economy, not unending extraction, regardless of how much “green tech” it produces, and not an AI-driven speculative economy. We cannot afford to have splintered conversations either; these AI and tech companies are war profiteers. The new Cold War on China drives this. The genocide in Palestine drives this. The war on Venezuela, Latin America, and the Caribbean drives this. And so our organizing must be unified against the impacts, mechanisms, and causes. Against data centers and the wars that drive them. We need to stop the blood. But we can’t lose sight of why and how the bullets are fired.

Aaron Kirshenbaum is CODEPINK’s War is Not Green campaigner and East Coast regional organizer. Based in, and originally from, Brooklyn, New York, Aaron holds an M.A. in Community Development and Planning from Clark University. They also hold a B.A. in Human-Environmental and Urban-Economic Geography from Clark. During their time in school, Aaron worked on internationalist climate justice organizing and educational program development, as well as Palestine, tenant, and abolitionist organizing.

(CounterPunch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

242
 
 

By Betzabeth Aldana Vivas  –  Jan 30, 2026

On January 29, after a decade of near-total prohibitions on the involvement of US companies in Venezuela’s oil sector, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General License (GL) No. 46 under the regulatory framework of the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR Part 591).

This measure entails a carefully calibrated administrative review that adjusts the existing regulatory framework and redefines the conditions under which US participation in Venezuelan oil operations is permitted.

It is a broad-scope license that authorizes, under specific conditions, transactions that were previously prohibited, covering almost the entire value chain of the sector: from crude oil extraction and lifting to its export, refining, marketing, transportation, and associated logistics services.

The authorization includes the export, re-export, sale, resale, supply, storage, purchase, delivery, and transportation of Venezuelan oil, as well as the refining of such oil.

We use the word “almost” because the new exemption does not mention primary activities, such as production, in line with the partial reform of the Organic Law of Hydrocarbons, since production remains under the control of the Venezuelan State, either directly through wholly state-owned companies, or through subsidiaries or joint ventures.

In essence, the core of this administrative reengineering prioritizes established US entities, making them the linchpin around which the new authorization is developed, with a vast focus on hydrocarbon commercialization.

After years in which various US governments, by political decision, chose to withdraw from the Venezuelan oil business and limit the participation of US companies in the sector under a sanctions regime, this license establishes a framework in which those companies can once again participate in accordance with regulations, without altering Venezuelan state control over primary production.

Established US entities
One of the central elements of this license is the reference to “established US entities,” a concept that precisely defines who may benefit from the authorization.

According to the interpretive note included in the license itself (Note 1 to paragraph (a)), an established US entity means “any entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States on or before January 29, 2025.”

This definition directly includes US oil and energy companies, as well as other legal entities incorporated in the United States that engage in activities ordinarily incidental and necessary for oil operations, such as maritime transport, insurance, logistics, port services, and terminals.

In fact, foreign companies are allowed to apply for authorization if they legally establish an entity or subsidiary in the United States.

This new scheme represents a substantial modification to the previous license management regime.

Before the issuance of General License No. 46, oil companies, especially US ones, had to apply to OFAC for specific licenses to carry out any activity related to Venezuelan oil, which entailed case-by-case processes, limited authorizations, and a high degree of administrative discretion.

With this general license, an ex ante authorization is established that allows US oil companies, in their entirety, to re-enter the Venezuelan oil business without having to obtain individual authorizations.

The license also introduces contractual requirements that reinforce US jurisdiction over the operations authorized to its companies.

Therefore, the license stipulates that every contract entered into with the Venezuelan government or PDVSA must expressly stipulate that it is governed by US law and that any dispute resolution mechanism will be carried out within US territory.

While the reform of the Organic Law of Hydrocarbons stipulates that contracts related to regulated activities may provide for dispute resolution mechanisms through Venezuelan courts or alternative means such as arbitration and mediation, in the case of US companies operating under GL 46, any dispute arising from their operations must be resolved in accordance with US law and within its jurisdiction.

In this framework, the Venezuelan Ministry of Hydrocarbons could, as appropriate, coordinate the inclusion of these clauses in the contracts, ensuring that both Venezuelan law and the terms of the license are respected, thereby guaranteeing the legal certainty of the parties and compliance with OFAC requirements.

On the other hand, since these are US companies, a surgical relief is introduced in one of the most critical bottlenecks of the Venezuelan oil trade: maritime insurance and P&I services. Amid the sanctions onslaught, these had been a real thorn in the side for crude oil shipments. By expressly authorizing the contracting of charters, maritime insurance, logistics, and port services, the license restores the link connecting Venezuelan oil to the traditional market.

The payments
In financial matters, General License No. 46 establishes a specific framework for handling payments to blockaded persons.

Such payments must be channeled through the “Foreign Government Deposit Funds,” a legal and technical concept defined in Executive Order 14373, or through any other account expressly designated by the Treasury Department.

This mechanism does not involve unblocking assets. Rather, it allows funds to remain under US regulatory oversight.

Similarly, the license leaves open the possibility that, in the future, other funds or accounts may be designated for use, which must be administered through the Treasury Department.

The license also authorizes commercially reasonable payments through crude oil, diluent, or refined product swaps, provided they comply with standard market practices.

At the same time, the license expressly prohibits debt swaps, gold payments, and transactions denominated in digital currencies.

This means that all transactions must be settled in US dollars, reaffirming a structural principle of US financial policy: ensuring that the region’s strategic energy continues to circulate in the global reserve currency.

In this way, the license allows US companies to resume access to Venezuelan oil without compromising the central role of the petrodollar in international transactions.

Geopolitical and trade logic
A central element of General License No. 46 is the precise delineation of the actors excluded from the authorized scheme.

Paragraph (b) operates as a legal and geopolitical cordon sanitaire, since it does not list prohibited oil activities for the companies but rather identifies modalities, actors, and corporate structures that remain off-limits, even under the new framework of flexibility.

First, the license absolutely excludes any transaction on the traditional market that involves, directly or indirectly, individuals or entities linked to Russia, Iran, North Korea, or Cuba, as well as corporate structures controlled by them or established in partnership with these actors.

This exclusion is due both to their status as strategic adversaries of the United States and to the fact that they are all subject to comprehensive sanctions regimes imposed by OFAC.

In these cases, the prohibition operates automatically, based solely on the jurisdiction of the party involved, almost as if it were determined by their nationality, regardless of the legal form of the transaction or its commercial design. Any connection, direct or indirect, with this group of countries is sufficient for the transaction to be excluded.

By contrast, the treatment of China follows a substantially different logic, since it is not a jurisdiction subject to comprehensive US sanctions.

OFAC does not impose a general prohibition based on Chinese nationality, nor does it exclude China as a potential market or final destination for Venezuelan crude oil commercialized by the US companies.

Paragraph (b) prohibits the corporate structure of the entity seeking to use the license and does not automatically identify all Chinese companies or the Chinese market as the final destination.

Thus, the license design intends to prevent Chinese actors from obtaining direct benefits within the license regime, without completely closing off the possibility of Venezuelan oil reaching the Chinese market through commercial channels outside the licensed framework, since the exemption includes broad authorizations, such as resale, re-export, and other successive commercial steps that introduce a degree of flexibility.

It should be noted that the explicit inclusion of practices such as resale and re-export, for example, opens a controlled loophole allowing Venezuelan crude to circulate beyond the initial buyer, even to third countries, albeit under a traceability and ex post oversight framework materialized in the obligation for the US oil companies to submit detailed reports to the State Department and the Department of Energy.

In certain scenarios, this would allow the indirect participation of private Chinese actors in the energy sector, provided that such participation occurs outside the Venezuelan or US entities covered by the license, without involving control, ownership, or any prohibited corporate association.

In other words, the exemption appears to allow these secondary transactions, but not in the gray market. Rather, it can be within a monitored framework that reintegrates Venezuelan oil into the traditional commercial circuit.

Venezuela’s National Assembly Unanimously Approves Hydrocarbons Law Reform

The key is being turned: administration of licenses
This new administrative maneuver in no way constitutes a lifting of sanctions.

The legal framework underpinning the sanctions regime against Venezuela remains intact, as the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act of 2014 and its successive extensions have not been repealed—something that is also politically unlikely, since the United States typically does not repeal such framework laws but rather administers them, reinterprets them, or overlays them with executive instruments.

Similarly, the executive orders declaring a “national emergency” with respect to Venezuela (and the new one of January 9) remain in effect. They form the direct legal basis upon which the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations (31 CFR Part 591) are built.

In other words, the parent legal framework has not been dismantled.

In that regard, it is appropriate to mention that the Sanctions Regulations derive from an act of Congress and presidential executive orders, and it is within that framework that the Treasury, through OFAC, deploys its administrative licensing mechanism.

General License No. 46 should therefore be read as a tool for administering the sanctions regime, not as a reversal of it.

It is a technical-political adjustment that allows certain operations without touching the legal core that enables the sanctions.

Now, within the broad catalog of general and specific licenses that Washington has issued, suspended, or modified in recent years, this license introduces a relevant nuance: it fully maintains the punitive nature of the scheme, but selectively eases its application at this stage, especially at the operational and commercial levels.

The system is made more flexible under strict conditions, with clear geopolitical exclusions, reinforced financial controls, and reporting mechanisms that preserve the US government’s monitoring and enforcement capabilities.

What is distinctive is that, while retaining that restrictive character, the license grants an unusually broad operational scope for certain oil activities, particularly for US companies that the US government itself had de facto expelled from the Venezuelan market under the sanctions umbrella.

Thus, rather than a dismantling of the measures, what is observed is a functional recalibration.

Finally, amid a complex geopolitical landscape, the Venezuelan government has carefully pieced together the elements within the sanctions regime, preserving control over the resource and primary activities, expanding operational capacity, and ensuring the continuity of public policies that benefit the country.

The strategy demonstrates skillful management of room for maneuver, as well as the ability to maintain essential operations and ensure that Venezuelan crude continues to flow, even in the context of historically severe international restrictions.

At the same time, it is clear that the United States’ strategic interest has always revolved around Venezuelan oil.

On the part of the Venezuelan government, trade and engagement channels were never completely closed. Rather, the sanctions policy itself imposed limits that are now being modified by General License No. 46.

Indeed, this shift in the sanctions regime tacitly reflects the gradual return of the United States to the Venezuelan oil business, a market it has considered strategic since time immemorial.

(Misión Verdad)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

243
 
 

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned that US leader Donald Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on countries that send oil to Cuba could trigger a severe humanitarian crisis.

“It would directly affect hospitals, food, and other basic services for the Cuban people, a situation that must be avoided out of respect for international law and through dialogue between the parties,” the president stated as she read an official response during her regular press conference on Friday, January 30. Mexico is one of the countries that has oil contracts with Cuba and could therefore be sanctioned under the new tariffs imposed by Trump.

“We need to know the scope [of the tariffs] because we also do not want to put our country at risk in terms of tariffs,” she added.

Sheinbaum revealed that she had asked Mexican Foreign Affairs Secretary Juan Ramón de la Fuente to seek immediate communication with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in order to learn the precise details of the new measure, as well as to emphasize to Rubio that “a humanitarian crisis must be prevented.”

She also clarified that Mexico only sends 1% of its oil production to Cuba and that, before making any decision on whether to maintain these contracts with the island, she will wait to engage in dialogue and explain to the US government that many lives could be put at risk. “Our concern is that the Cuban people should not suffer, because not having oil means no electricity generation. Imagine a hospital that cannot function, or an intensive care unit,” she insisted.

Trump Admin Weighs Oil Blockade on Cuba for Regime Change: Politico

Solidarity
Sheinbaum added that Mexico upholds the sovereignty and right to self-determination of peoples, and that it will seek alternative ways to help Cubans going through “a difficult time,” as this is in line with a long-standing tradition of Mexico’s solidarity with Cuba.

On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order that went into effect at midnight, giving him the power to impose tariffs on imports from countries that sell or supply oil to Cuba. This order was signed on the basis that Cuba “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security and foreign policy.

Earlier this week, the Mexican national oil company Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex) suspended oil shipments to Cuba, but Sheinbaum said that this was due to the terms of the contracts signed with the Cuban government, not to political pressure from the US. “It is a sovereign decision by Pemex,” she said, while guaranteeing that humanitarian aid shipments to Cuba will continue.

The president clarified that Mexico will explore avenues for humanitarian support that do not compromise the country’s economic stability. “We want to explore diplomatic channels and various ways to support…We will find a way, without putting Mexico at risk,” she stated.

For his part, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel called Trump’s executive order an attempt to suffocate his country’s economy. “Under a mendacious pretext devoid of any arguments, peddled by those who engage in politicizing and enriching themselves at the expense of our people’s suffering, President Trump intends to suffocate the Cuban economy by imposing tariffs on countries that, in their sovereign right, trade oil with Cuba,” he wrote on social media.

“This new measure demonstrates the fascist, criminal, and genocidal nature of a clique that has hijacked the interests of the American people for purely personal gain,” the Cuban president added. “Did the Secretary of State and his clowns not claim that the blockade did not exist?”

(Diario VEA)

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/SC/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

244
 
 

By Eva Karene Bartlett – Jan 28, 2026

No one is safe from the ‘Russian propaganda’ sanctions – even those who never touch Russian sources. Baud is one of nearly 60 public figures under sanctions from the EU

January 27, 2026, RT.com

On December 15, 2025, the European Union slapped sanctions on former Swiss intelligence officer and ex-NATO employee Jacques Baud. No day in court, no charges filed, just abrupt, suffocating, sanctions.

Why did the EU sanction Baud? For “Russian propaganda,” of course, although many of the sources he cites in his reports on the West provoking war with Russia years prior to Russia’s military operation are Western and Ukrainian – including the SBU and Aleksey Arestovich, a former adviser to Vladimir Zelensky.

Welcome to the latest EU insanity.

Widely respected for his deep knowledge and analysis, much of which is based on his own research while working with NATO, Baud has grown increasingly popular over the years, appearing on numerous podcasts and interviews, authoring numerous books and articles as well.

Since Russia began its military operation in Ukraine, Western media have been howling about an “unprovoked invasion.” Baud has written and spoken extensively about realities which counter this claim: facts on the ground prior to February 2022, going back (unlike most legacy media who have developed selective amnesia) to even before the 2014 Maidan coup.

What is interesting about Baud is he does not use Russian sources to back his claims and he has not taken a public position in favor of either Russia or Ukraine.

He has simply analyzed the situation, based on information he had access to. How did he have access to this information? In 2014, when working for NATO in charge of countering proliferation of small arms, he was tasked with investigating accusations of Russia supplying arms to Donbass resistance.

He wrote of this in 2022, noting, “The information we received then came almost entirely from Polish intelligence services and did not ‘fit’ with the information coming from the OSCE – despite rather crude allegations, there were no deliveries of weapons and military equipment from Russia.”

“The rebels were armed thanks to the defection of Russian-speaking Ukrainian units that went over to the rebel side. As Ukrainian failures continued, tank, artillery and anti-aircraft battalions swelled the ranks of the autonomists.

As a result of his research, he was also able to unequivocally debunk accusations of Russia sending military units into Donbass, by quoting the SBU (Ukrainian security service) itself as well as other Ukrainian sources.

In a September 2024 interview I did with Baud, he spoke of this.

“I can categorically say no, there were no Russian forces in Donbass. The guy you encountered (I had mentioned*meeting*one sole Russian former soldier when I went to the Donbass in 2019) represents exactly the kind of Russian presence that was at that time, recognized by the SBU and recognized also by the Ukrainian Chief of Staff.

“In a public interview in 2015, just after the signature of the Minsk Agreement 2, the head of the Ukrainian General Staff said publicly that there were no Russian military units fighting in Donbass; that there were only individual soldiers exactly the same case as the one you just mentioned.”

It is clear he is not citing Russian information (or “propaganda”) but Ukrainian and Western sources. An even better illustration of this is what he had to say about the prelude to Russia commencing its Special Military Operation in February 2022.

Referring to a March 2021 decree by Zelensky (to take back Crimea and the south of Ukraine), Baud spoke of an interview two years prior with Zelensky’s former adviser, Arestovich.

“He says in order to join NATO, we had to have a war with Russia. When the interviewer asked him when would this conflict happen, Arestovich says end of 2021 or 2022.” A position, Baud noted, which aligned with a March 2019 300-page document published by the Rand Corporation, “that explains how to defeat and to destabilize Russia.

The EU is almost certainly pissed off that Baud likewise demolished the Western propaganda claims about Russia invading Crimea in 2014. He told me“The Ukrainian army at that time was a conscript army, meaning that within the Ukrainian army you had both Ukrainian speakers and Russian speakers. When the army was ordered to shoot or to fight against demonstrators, those who were Russian speakers just defected, they just changed side. They just went to support the protesters and they became in fact those the famous ‘little green men’.”

Keep in mind that Baud was working for NATO then. “There was absolutely not the slightest indication that Russia brought new troops to Crimea. Based on the status of force agreement signed between Russia and Ukraine, you had up to 25,000 Russian troops stationed in the Crimean peninsula. At that time they were not even 25,000, there were 22,000. A Ukrainian lawmaker on Ukrainian TV said that out of the 20,000 (sic) Ukrainian soldiers that were deployed in Crimea, 20,000 defected to the Russian-speaking side.”

As for “Russian propaganda,” it is a term bandied about quite easily by legacy media and NATO mouthpieces to taint reputations or lead to censorship of voices. The war backers are upset that their own “Russia started it” propaganda isn’t working

The Military Situation in the Ukraine

Sanctions prevent Baud from even buying food

Baud lives in Brussels, and now as a result of the sanctions is unable to even buy food for himself. Nor can well-intending people do so on his behalf. In an interview on Dialogue Works at the end of December, 2025, Baud said:

“Yesterday, a friend of mine tried from Switzerland to buy food for me, to be delivered to my home (in Belgium). She could order, but the payment was blocked. Any delivery to my home is prohibited, even if the funds come from Switzerland.”

People who are aware of his unjust situation have been physically bringing him food, to alleviate his inability to purchase it himself.

In a more recent interview on Judging Freedom, Baud highlighted that his case was a foreign policy decision, denying him due process.

“This is not a decision that has been taken by any court. I was not judged by anybody. In fact I was not in front of a jury. I could not present my case. I could not defend my case. This decision was not taken by a court but by the council of the foreign ministers of the European union.”

The most he can do, Baud explained, is, “go to the European Court of Justice and try to make my case saying that the decision was not just, and the court of justice may then study the case and have an assessment on that.” Even if the court concludes the sanctions are not justified, all it can then do is “advise the council of foreign ministers to change their mind.”

Given that the sanctions against Baud are punitive for his not toeing the line, it is unlikely minds will be changed.

A growing list of EU sanctioned voices

Hüseyin Dogru@hussedogru

You literally sanctioned me for exercising my freedom of speech.

Ursula von der Leyen @vonderleyen

Freedom of speech is the foundation of our strong and vibrant European democracy. We are proud of it. We will protect it. Because the @EU_Commission is the guardian of our values.

9:38 PM · Dec 24, 2025 · 2.39M Views

513 Replies · 13.3K Reposts · 66.5K Likes

Jacques Baud isn’t the first to be sanctioned by the EU. Many journalists and public figures have been sanctioned for their writings or words on the Donbass, Crimea, corruption in Ukraine, and so on. However, many have safety in Russia or elsewhere, and while their foreign bank accounts have been unjustly frozen, they can at least buy food and otherwise live normally.

A recent article in Forum Geopolitica notes the brazen illegality of these sanctions. “In contrast to Article 11 of its own charter, the EU has decided to punish, disenfranchise and expropriate the citizens of all countries without any offence having been committed, as was last seen in Nazi Germany.

“This elimination of dissidents is not ordered by a court, but by the ‘Council of the European Union’, the political arm of the EU. The Council, in which non-democratically elected apparatchiks lead a good life, is chaired by Kaja Kallas, herself not democratically elected. We are back in the Middle Ages.

French journalist Xavier Moreau was also sanctioned, and roughly half a year prior, Swiss-Cameroonian political activist Nathalie Yamb was targeted.

Nathalie Yamb@Nath_Yamb

Pour tous ceux qui veulent savoir ce que ça signifie être placé sous sanctions de l’Union européenne et quels seront les impacts pour Jacques Baud ou Xavier Moreau, je partage d’expérience, puisque je suis la première suissesse sanctionnée (depuis le 26 juin 2025). Pour Xavier,

5:46 PM · Dec 16, 2025 · 235K Views

323 Replies · 1.73K Reposts · 4.21K Likes

German journalist, Hüseyin Doğru, was sanctioned in May 2025 for, being a “Russian disinformation actor, and for, according to him, “pro-Palestine reporting and documenting the repression of activists in Germany + the EU.”

As with the others sanctioned, no evidence of the EU’s accusations was provided, particularly no proof of financial ties to Russia or Russian media.

Hüseyin Dogru@hussedogru

This is the entirety of the so-called “evidence” gathered by the EU to sanction me. Not a single word, let alone evidence or proof (not even falsified ones) about my alleged financial ties to “Russian state propaganda” apparatus – which is the whole basis of me being sanctioned.

9:01 AM · Sep 3, 2025 · 5.12K Views

4 Replies · 70 Reposts · 315 Likes

petition demanding “the immediate lifting of the illegal sanctions against Jacques Baud as well as against all journalists, scholars, and EU citizens,” rightly notes it is not a crime to name the true reasons for the Ukraine war.

It is not a crime to draw readers’ attention to untruths and to the EU’s and NATO’s own propaganda. It is not a crime to point out the thoughtless cooperation of the West with Ukrainian forces that show a dangerous proximity to fascists.

Further noting the sanctions have targeted 59 journalists and scholars, it points out, the EU is “using the sanctions list as an instrument to silence critics and is maneuvering itself ever deeper into an abyss of lawlessness.”

Quite amusingly, President of the EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen (also known as Ursula von der Lying), posted of “protecting” freedom of speech. The EU Commission website claims the right to freedom of expression, “also means the freedom and pluralism of the media shall be respected.”

The sanctions are part of the broader desperate campaign of threatening and censoring voices that report truthfully on matters related to Ukraine, the ongoing Israeli genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, and other timely topics. Yes, they can censor us by deleting our Youtube and social media platforms, or by imposing sanctions on journalists, authors, and other public figures.

But, it doesn’t work. Baud said he now has more visibility and more credibility. “It’s always a bad idea when you start preventing someone to speak. This attracts more more attention.

Related:

-Under Fire from Ukraine and Misperceived by the West, The People of the DPR Share Their Stories, October 16, 2019, Mint Press News (In Gaza)

JACQUES BAUD: NATO ATTEMPTED TO DESTABILIZE & THREATEN RUSSIA DECADES BEFORE 2022, September 19, 2024

JACQUES BAUD: US MEDIA SHIFT NARRATIVE ON UKRAINE BEFORE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, October 7, 2024

-Jacques Baud’s writings published on The Postil

Donbass: My Articles, Videos & Interviews (2019-present)

–Return to Russia: Crimeans Tell the Real Story of the 2014 Referendum and Their Lives Since, October 19, 2019, Mint Press News (In Gaza)

Crimean Tatar & Interethnic and Interfaith Relations Chair, Ibraim Shirin, Counters Western Lies on Crimea, May 2024

(Substack)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

245
 
 

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—On Friday, during the solemn opening session of the 2026 judicial year at the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) headquarters in Caracas, Venezuela, Acting President Delcy Rodríguez announced the decision to promote a General Amnesty Law. The law will cover the entire period of far-right political violence from 1999 to the present.

The measure, which will be presented to the National Assembly by the Commission for Judicial Revolution and the Program for Coexistence and Peace, follows precedents of two amnesty laws decreed by former President Hugo Chávez and one by President Nicolás Maduro.

During her address, Rodríguez indicated that the Venezuelan government maintains communication with President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. “We have exchanges with them,” she noted.

Addressing the context of the amnesty law, Rodríguez added that “it is very difficult to talk about justice in a world with fewer and fewer rights every day.” She pointed out that the events in Venezuela in the early morning of January 3, 2026, serve as a primary example. “It is a violation of international law. The attack, the foreign military aggression, and the kidnapping of a president, a first lady and a member of parliament can only mean that there is less law in the world.”

“However, we already knew that when we witnessed such painful situations as the genocide in Palestine, when I heard Venezuelan girls and boys express their pain over the aggression of that early morning,” she added, paying tribute to those who died fighting on January 3, “in conditions of great inequality.”

She emphasized that those who fell were “both Venezuelans and Cubans, but I say citizens of the Patria Grande, who fought in the name of Our America and the Caribbean, for humanity, defending international law, Bolívar, Martí, and the dignity of humble peoples like those of Venezuela and Cuba.”

In announcing the law, she stated: “May it be a law that serves to repair the wounds left by political confrontation stemming from violence and extremism, that serves to strengthen justice in our country, and that serves to restore coexistence among Venezuelans.”

The acting president specified that those excluded from the amnesty will be individuals “prosecuted and convicted of homicide, drug trafficking, corruption, and serious human rights violations.”

Transformation of El Helicoide
Rodríguez announced that El Helicoide will cease operating as a detention center. “We have decided that the Helicoide facilities, which currently serve as a detention center, will be transformed into a social, sports, cultural, and commercial center for police families and the surrounding communities,” she added. The transformation of the building will be coordinated by the Commission for Democratic Coexistence and Peace, along with other ministries.

She stated that this measure is an opportunity to live in peace and tranquility in Venezuela. “Despite the differences that exist, we can coexist with respect, and above all, with respect for the law and justice in Venezuela, given the diversity and plurality that exists,” she added.

The acting president also asked the TSJ to pronounce itself on the recent US OFAC license 46. “I want to ask the TSJ Constitutional Chamber for a ruling on the general license issued yesterday by the US Department of the Treasury… In order to preserve Venezuela’s jurisdiction and to preserve Venezuela’s right to diverse international relations and economic cooperation with the whole world.”

Judicial revolution and national consultation
During the ceremony, Rodríguez called for a major national consultation on a new justice system, with the goal of making “justice the queen of republican virtues and ensuring peace and the future of Venezuela as an independent, free, sovereign, and peaceful nation.” She also emphasized that these decisions embody “the spirit of Chávez and Maduro.”

She presented revealing data on the incarcerated population in Venezuela to highlight the need for reform:

• 68.8% belong to socioeconomic strata 4 and 5 (the lowest-income groups), while only 1.14% are from stratum 1.
• 75% of those convicted admitted to the crimes—a decision often made due to procedural delays and the high costs of the criminal process to reduce waiting times.
• 89% are first-time offenders.
• 63.51% have only an elementary education.

Given this assessment, Rodríguez called for a “change in this reality” and greater social intervention in health, education, and support for the most vulnerable sectors. She emphasized the need for a justice system that prioritizes prevention, inclusion, and social justice.

Statements by Justice Caryslia Rodríguez
Before Delcy Rodríguez’s speech, the president of the TSJ, Justice Caryslia Rodríguez, stated that the judicial branch has formed a cohesive bloc to defend Venezuela’s sacred interests. She noted that the branch embraces Bolivarian Diplomacy of Peace as the guiding principle of sovereignty and commits to providing absolute support for the construction of the new legal framework proposed by the acting president.

She also announced that the TSJ will provide unrestricted legal support to the state’s diplomatic efforts to achieve the immediate return of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.

During her speech, the justice emphasized that the judiciary stands as an “unyielding bastion of peace.” She highlighted that, in times of trial for the national soul, justice constitutes the fundamental foundation of a free nation, and the loyalty of its officials is a non-negotiable commitment to the collective destiny.

Venezuela’s National Assembly Unanimously Approves Hydrocarbons Law Reform

“We declare that the Venezuelan rule of law remains firm and that legality cannot be broken by acts of force,” she stated, emphasizing that the judiciary will not yield to pressure. She also highlighted the commitment to continue transforming the justice system toward an alternative model that promotes equal opportunities and direct support for the people.

The Supreme Court also reaffirmed its commitment to the country’s stability by expressing its full support for Delcy Rodríguez in her role as acting president. Justice Rodríguez reiterated the validity of the ruling that underpins Delcy Rodríguez’s appointment as acting president, assuring that the court guarantees institutional continuity and the legality of the leadership, who currently also serves as commander-in-chief of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (FANB).

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

OT/JRE/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

246
 
 

On Thursday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order authorizing him to impose tariffs on imports from countries that sell or supply oil to Cuba. According to Trump, the situation in Cuba “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat” to the security and foreign policy of Washington, and he has therefore declared a “national emergency.”

Based on these unfounded accusations, Trump has established a tariff system. According to this system, “an additional ad valorem duty may be imposed on imports of goods that are products of a foreign country that directly or indirectly sells or otherwise provides any oil to Cuba.”

The measure will take effect at midnight on January 30. The document states that the order may be modified if new information emerges, recommendations from senior officials arise, or circumstances change. It also outlines actions to be taken should a foreign country retaliate against the United States in response to this aggression, in order to maintain effectiveness.

The blockade against #Cuba that some people say it is a fiction, now would implemented through blackmail on third countries. Voila.https://t.co/THXI0mkUmT

— Dr C José Ramón Cabañas Rodriguez (@JoseRCabanas) January 30, 2026

The order also indicates that if the government of Cuba or another affected country adopts significant measures and “aligns itself” with Washington on national security and foreign policy matters, the order could also be modified.

The US ruler argued that the Cuban government has adopted extraordinary measures that harm and threaten the United States, aligning itself with and providing support to countries considered hostile, as well as to “transnational terrorist groups,  and other malign actors opposed” to Washington.

It accuses the Cuban government, without providing evidence, of having long provided “defense, intelligence, and security assistance to adversaries” of the United States in the Western Hemisphere, evading US and international sanctions, and trying to hinder Washington’s efforts to deal with malicious actors in the region.

For over six decades, Cuba has been subjected to a criminal US blockade and illegal sanctions in a multifaceted, unsuccessful regime-change operation. The most recent US sanctions launched during Trump’s first term, which were recently strengthened, have brought pain and despair upon many defenseless Cubans.

Cuba’s condemnation
On Thursday night, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez harshly criticized the new measures taken by the US against Cuba. “We condemn in the strongest terms the new escalation by the US against Cuba,” the minister wrote.

He explained that a total blockade of fuel supplies to Cuba is currently being proposed. “To justify this, they rely on a long list of lies that attempt to portray Cuba as a threat it is not,” he added.

“Every day, there is new evidence that the only threat to the peace, security, and stability of the region, and the only malignant influence, is that exerted by the US government against the nations and peoples of Our America, whom it tries to subject to its dictates, deprive of their resources, mutilate their sovereignty, and deprive of their independence,” Rodríguez added.

According to the Cuban foreign minister, Washington “also resorts to blackmail and coercion to get other countries to join its universally condemned blockade policy against Cuba, threatening them with the imposition of arbitrary and abusive tariffs if they refuse, in violation of the rules of free trade.”

“We condemn before the world this brutal act of aggression against Cuba and its people, who, for over 65 years, have been subjected to the longest and cruelest economic blockade ever applied against an entire nation, and who are now promised to be subjected to extreme living conditions,” he summarized.

Venezuela’s condemnation
Venezuela strongly condemned the new US executive order against Cuba. A statement released by Foreign Minister Yván Gil noted that these actions flagrantly violate international law and the principles of global trade.

Likewise, it denounced any measure aimed at conditioning the exchange of goods and services as a violation of sovereignty. The communique adds that free trade is a fundamental pillar of international economic relations, and should not be subject to coercion that impedes the development of sovereign peoples.

Marco Rubio Testifies to US Senate About Attack on Venezuela: His Claims Do Not Add Up

The following is the full unofficial translation of the Venezuelan statement:

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela condemns the executive order issued by the government of the United States of America. The order seeks to impose punitive measures on countries that decide to maintain legitimate trade relations with the Republic of Cuba.

Any measure that limits or conditions the exchange of goods and services, as well as the freedom of states to sovereignly choose their trading partners, constitutes a violation of international law and the fundamental principles governing global trade. Free trade is a core principle of international economic relations between sovereign states. It cannot be subject to any form of coercion that impedes the free exchange of goods and services.

Venezuela expresses its solidarity with the people of Cuba and calls for collective action from the international community to address the humanitarian consequences of aggression of this nature. To consider Cuba a threat to the national security of the United States of America is absurd and poses a serious threat to its very existence as a nation.

Caracas, Jan. 30, 2026

(Alba Ciudad) with Orinoco Tribune content

Translation: Orinoco Tribune

OT/JRE/SF


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

247
 
 

Caracas, January 30, 2026 (venezuelanalysis.com) – The Venezuelan National Assembly has approved a sweeping reform of the country’s 2001 Hydrocarbon Law that rolls back the state’s role in the energy sector in favor of private capital.

Legislators unanimously endorsed the bill at its second discussion on Thursday, with only opposition deputy Henrique Capriles abstaining. The legislative overhaul follows years of US sanctions against the Venezuelan oil industry and a naval blockade imposed in December.

National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez hailed the vote a “historic day” and claimed the new bill will lead oil production to “skyrocket.”

“The reform will make the oil sector much more competitive for national and foreign corporations to extract crude,” he told reporters. “We are implementing mechanisms that have proven very successful.”

Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez signed and enacted the law after the parliamentary session, claiming that the industry will be guided by “the best international practices” and undertake a “historic leap forward.”

Former President Hugo Chávez revamped the country’s oil legislation in 2001 and introduced further reforms in 2006 and 2007 to assert the Venezuelan state’s primacy over the industry. Policies included a mandatory stakeholding majority for state oil company PDVSA in joint ventures, PDVSA control over operations and sales, and increased royalties and income tax to 30 and 50 percent, respectively. Increased oil revenues bankrolled the Venezuelan government’s expanded social programs in the 2000s.

The text approved during Thursday’s legislative session, following meetings between Venezuelan authorities and oil executives, went further than the draft preliminarily endorsed one week earlier.

The final version of the legislation establishes 30 percent as an upper bound for royalties, with the Venezuelan government given the discretionary power to determine the rate for each project. A 33 percent extraction tax in the present law was scrapped in favor of an “integrated hydrocarbon tax” to be set by the executive with a 15 percent limit.

Similarly, the Venezuelan government can reduce income taxes for companies involved in oil activities while also granting several other fiscal exemptions. The bill cites the “need to ensure international competitiveness” as a factor to be considered when decreasing royalty and tax demands for private corporations.

The reform additionally grants operational and sales control to minority partners and private contractors. PDVSA can furthermore lease out oilfields and projects in exchange for a fixed portion of extracted crude. The new legislation likewise allows disputes to be settled by outside arbitration instances.

Thursday’s legislative reform was immediately followed by a US Treasury general license allowing US corporations to re-engage with the Venezuelan oil sector.

General License 46 (GL46) authorizes US firms to purchase and market Venezuelan crude while demanding that contracts be subjected to US jurisdiction so potential disputes are referred to US courts. The license bars transactions with companies from Russia, Iran, North Korea, or Cuba. Concerning China, it only blocks dealings with Venezuelan joint ventures with Chinese involvement.

Economist Francisco Rodríguez pointed out that the sanctions waiver does not explicitly allow for production or investment and that companies would require an additional license before signing contracts with Venezuelan authorities.

GL46 also mandates that payments to blocked agents, including PDVSA, be made to the US Foreign Government Deposit Funds or another account defined by the US Treasury Department.

Following the January 3 military strikes and kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, the Trump administration has vowed to take control of the Venezuelan oil industry by administering crude transactions. Proceeds from initial sales have been deposited in US-run bank accounts in Qatar, with a portion rerouted to Caracas for forex injections run by private banks. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed that the resources will begin to be channeled to US Treasury accounts in the near future.

In a press conference on Friday, Trump said his administration is “very happy” with the actions of Venezuelan authorities and would soon invite other countries to get involved in the Caribbean nation’s oil industry. Rubio had previously argued that Caracas “deserved credit” for the oil reform that “eradicates Chávez-era restrictions on private investments.”

Despite the White House’s calls for substantial investment, Western oil corporations have expressed reservations over major projects in the Venezuelan energy sector. Chevron, the largest US company operating in the country, stated that it is looking to fund increased production with revenues from oil sales as opposed to new capital commitments.

Since 2017, Venezuela’s oil industry has been under wide-reaching US unilateral coercive measures, including financial sanctions and an export embargo, in an effort to strangle the country’s most important revenue source. The US Treasury Department has also levied and threatened secondary sanctions against third-country companies to deter involvement in the Venezuelan petroleum sector.

The post Venezuela Approves Pro-Business Oil Reform as Trump Issues New Sanctions Waiver appeared first on Venezuelanalysis.


From Venezuelanalysis via This RSS Feed.

248
 
 

By James Patrick Jordan  –  Jan 28, 2026

Illegal US military strikes on January 3, 2026, against Venezuela have elicited a flood of resolutions from labor unions. Some of these have focused solely on the US aggression and solidarity with the Venezuelan people. Others have gone further to condemn the kidnapping and arrest of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. In at least one case, a resolution by the Tucson chapter of the National Writers Union has called for systemic changes to how the AFL-CIO, the US’ largest labor confederation, and its Solidarity Center (formerly the American Center for International Labor Solidarity), conducts its international relations. In each case, union members are undertaking important steps towards peace and solidarity as well as opening up possibilities for the emergence of a truly independent US labor movement. 

These resolutions are the latest in a series of cases where labor has broken with US foreign policies, including military strikes and acts of war. Beginning with the AFL-CIO’s 2005 passage of the USLAW Resolution 53: “The War in Iraq”, the federation and both affiliated and unaffiliated unions have gone on to speak out against coups in Honduras and Bolivia, repressive immigration policies, neoliberal trade agreements, and other global wars and threats of war.

In contrast, the Solidarity Center, the AFL-CIO’s primary channel for international activities, has continued to collaborate with US policies of regime change. The AFL-CIO’s Solidarity Center is historically 90 to 96% funded by the US government, and its policies are set in consultation with the White House rather than with representatives from its member unions. The Solidarity Center is one of the core institutes of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), along with the International Republican Institute (IRI), the Center for International Private Enterprise (US Chamber of Commerce), and the National Democratic Institute (NDI). The NED was created by the US Congress in 1983 in large part to “…do today [what] was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”

The Solidarity Center has played support roles in coups and coup attempts as well as invasions and occupations in Haiti, Venezuela, and Iraq, to name a few examples. In Haiti, the Solidarity Center withheld support for the largest union during the IRI orchestrated coup and instead funded a small labor organization that refused to oppose the coup. In Iraq, the Solidarity Center ignored unions and workers organizations protesting the US occupation in order to support union organizing that would avoid such direct challenges. 

In Venezuela, the Solidarity Center funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to plotters of the failed coup of 2002. Since then, the Solidarity Center has provided a black box worth millions in funding for activities in Venezuela. However, it has provided no details about how those funds are being used or to whom they are being distributed. 

The recent freeze in funding for the NED and the Solidarity Center by the Trump Administration is being treated as a crisis. It has resulted in lawsuits by both institutions to recover funding. However, orphaned by the White House, there is another way forward for the AFL-CIO and the Solidarity Center. The Tucson NWU resolution calls for the Solidarity Center to open its books on its activities and to wean itself off government funding. The recent experiences of unions declaring their solidarity with both Palestine and Venezuela have shown many the profound need for a new era of labor independence. 

Labor unionists in solidarity with Venezuela should study and learn from experiences regarding Palestine. Labor mobilizations against the genocide in Gaza represented a break not only with international US policies but, specifically, with the leadership of the AFL-CIO which has long supported Zionism and even to this day, acted to stifle solidarity with Palestine. In an article for Left Voice, Jason Koslowski informs us that, 

“By October 18, a little fewer than 2,000 were dead in Gaza. That’s when one of the AFL-CIO’s organs in Washington State — the Thurston-Lewis-Mason Central Labor Council, or TMLCLC — met and passed a resolution demanding a ceasefire. 

The TMLCLC’s resolution ‘opposes in principle any union involvement in the production or transportation of weapons destined for Israel.’ And it challenges the AFL-CIO leadership, too: 

‘[W]hile the TLMCLC agrees with the AFL-CIO’s statement calling for a ‘just and lasting peace,’ we would ask our parent federation to also publicly support an immediate ceasefire and equal rights for Palestinians and Israelis.

The AFL-CIO leadership caught wind of this dissent. That’s when it stepped in. 

Labor Activists Launch New Organization to Challenge AFL-CIO Foreign Policy

A representative of the AFL-CIO leaders contacted the labor council to declare the dissenting statement void. Under pressure, the Washington labor council deleted the statement from its Twitter account.”

Jeff Shurke is the author of the must-read book No Neutrals There: US Labor, Zionism, and the Struggle for Palestine. Shurke, in an article for Jacobin, adds that, 

“…an AFL-CIO senior field representative informed the council’s board members that their resolution was null and void because it did not conform to the national federation’s official policy…. About a week later, AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler sent a memorandum to all local labor councils and state labor federations across the United States telling them that ‘the national AFL-CIO is the only body that can render an official public position or action on national or international issues.’ Without explicitly referencing the unfolding carnage in Gaza, she was all but telling the federation’s local and statewide bodies they were not allowed to stand in solidarity with Palestine.

Still, the AFL-CIO’s individual member unions — which, unlike central labor councils, operate as autonomous affiliates of the federation — were free to take their own positions. Beginning with the American Postal Workers Union and United Auto Workers (UAW), over the following weeks and months several of them formally joined the growing chorus of international voices demanding a ceasefire in Gaza… culminating in the establishment of a new union coalition dubbed the National Labor Network for Ceasefire.

The AFL-CIO itself eventually came out in favor of a “negotiated cease-fire” in early February 2024, after at least twenty-five thousand Palestinians had already been killed. Despite these positive developments, the AFL-CIO and its affiliated unions at the national level still failed to answer the explicit Palestinian call to refrain from building or shipping weapons for Israel.”

In the case of the Tucson NWU’s resolution, rather than going through labor federations, the resolution has been sent to the national NWU for passage and forwarding to the AFL-CIO for consideration in the next convention. Other unions are debating similar resolutions. There also is discussion of bringing resolutions before labor counsels and federations despite the AFL-CIO’s admonishments. 

Right now, three kinds of resolutions have emerged from labor in response to the January 3rd attack on Venezuela. They are all good. 

•  The first kind is to condemn the attacks without further elaboration. That is positive, but by leaving out reference to the kidnapping of President Maduro and Cilia Flores, the resolutions sidestep the issue of regime change itself. 
•  The second kind adds a demand for the release of Maduro and Flores. This is better and implicitly breaks with the AFL-CIO’s and the Solidarity Center’s support for regime change. 
•  The Tucson NWU resolution is an example of the third approach. It takes worker-to-worker solidarity to its logical conclusion, calling for systemic change so that the AFL-CIO will never again support US coups and invasions but, instead, plot an independent course. That is the most meaningful kind of change, one that lasts beyond just the current moment and conflict. 

The opportunity to achieve that kind of change is here. Abandoned by the White House, pressured by its own rank and file, the time has come for the AFL-CIO to choose a new path. What will be its response?  

Notes:

For those seeking to delve further,  labor sociologist Kim Scipes wrote regarding the 2002 coup attempt in his 2004 article AFL-CIO in Venezuela: Déjà Vu All Over Again. Fellow labor sociologist Tim Gill provided details regarding Solidarity Center activities in Venezuela between 2006 and 2014. One may look to the Alliance for Global Justice website to find reports about funding for Venezuela since 2014. For  even more in-depth reading: Jeff Schuhrke’s book, Blue Collar Empire: The Untold Story of US Labor’s Global Anticommunist Crusade (Verso, 2024), which details AFL-CIO operations during the Cold War.  The other, a little older, is by Kim Scipes and talks about labor’s foreign policy from the late 1890s until 2007, but which includes a specific look at the AFL-CIO’s operations in Venezuela around the 2002 coup attempt against Hugo Chavez; it’s titled AFL-CIO’s Secret War against Developing Country Workers:  Solidarity or Sabotage?(Bloomsbury Press, 2011).  Scipes has written extensively on this, and his writings can be found on-line for free here.

JPJ/OT


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

249
 
 

Every day, President Claudia Sheinbaum gives a morning presidential press conference and Mexico Solidarity Media posts English language summaries, translated by Mexico Solidarity’s Pedro Gellert Frank. Previous press conference summaries are available here.

Editor’s note: Mexico will not be sending oil to Cuba.

Baja California Reduces Violence with Results

Governor Marina del Pilar reported that intentional homicides in Baja California decreased more than 40% in November 2025. In addition, high-impact crimes have posted an accumulated reduction of close to 46%.

Cuba and National Dignity

President Claudia Sheinbaum stated Mexico’s position regarding U.S. tariffs on countries exporting oil to Cuba: support for sovereignty and self-determination, and warning of a possible humanitarian crisis. She clarified that Mexico sends less than 1% of its oil production as humanitarian aid for transportation and electric power generation.

Memory, Context, and Contrast

Sheinbaum noted that the goal is to avoid a humanitarian crisis, so Mexico will send an official statement to the U.S. government and instructed Minister of Foreign Relations Juan Ramón de la Fuente to communicate with the State Department, while also exploring alternative support options for the Cuban people.

The President recalled that in 2013, then president Enrique Peña Nieto and PRI leader forgave Cuba’s oil debt and she reiterated that today Mexico sends less than 1% of its oil production to Havana.

Migration with a Humanitarian Focus

Migration to the United States has decreased significantly, and a humanitarian policy has been developed from the southern to the northern border. Sheinbaum sent a message to Mexican migrants, emphasizing that they are heroes of the homeland, who not only contribute to their families in Mexico but also make California what it is today.

End to Tax Privileges

It was reported that Grupo Salinas made an initial payment of slightly over 10 million pesos (US$580,000) to the Tax Administration System (SAT), as part of a fiscal debt amounting to 32 billion pesos (US$1.85 billion), to be paid off over 18 months. This is the highest amount settled in a case of this nature. President Sheinbaum recalled that during López Obrador’s administration, constitutional prohibition of tax forgiveness was enacted, enabling the collection of record high back tax debts.

An Economy That Delivers

Mexico’s economic performance in 2025 was better than analysts predicted. Confidence is reflected in the strength of the peso against the dollar, at an exchange rate of 17.3 pesos. The President reminded her adversaries that the country’s reality outweighs any argument seeking to minimize these achievements.

Interoceanic Train: Investigation Underway

It was reported that the conductors of the Interoceanic Train that derailed did not have valid licenses as machinists; the incident was described as an administrative issue, not a direct cause of the accident. The President emphasized that it is up to the Federal Attorney General’s Office (FGR) to conduct expert analyses to clarify the causes of the accident and assign responsibilities; the report that was delivered is preliminary, and investigations continue.


The post People’s Mañanera January 30 appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

250
 
 

This article originally appeared in the January 29, 2026 edition of Sin Embargo.

Mexico City. The Tax Administration Service (SAT) reported that Grupo Salinas, owned by businessman Ricardo Salinas Pliego, made an initial payment of 10,400,630,537 pesos, which was deposited into the Federal Treasury this Thursday. The remaining debt of 32,132,897,658 pesos will be paid in “small installments” over 18 payments.

This means that the owner of Elektra will have to settle the remaining 21,732,267,121 pesos of the debt in installments of 1,207,349,174.39 pesos.

“The Tax Administration Service (SAT) reports that, in accordance with the benefits established in the Federal Tax Code and in compliance with applicable court rulings, a business group will make a payment totaling 32,132,897,658 pesos. Of this amount, 10,400,630,537 pesos were already deposited into the Federal Treasury today, while the remaining amount will be covered through 18 payments,” the agency explained in a press release.

For its part, Grupo Salinas announced that it has decided to “turn the page” and conclude all the litigation it has been waging against the Mexican government.

“We have always said it, and we reiterate it today: Grupo Salinas and its founding president, Ricardo Benjamin Salinas Pliego, comply—and have always complied—with tax payments. In the last 20 years, our companies have paid more than 300 billion pesos in tax obligations. No one can deny that we are fulfilling our obligations to Mexico,” the business group stated in a press release.

Grupo Salinas Asserts it “no longer owes anything to the Government”

The business group stated that it has already fulfilled its obligations and owes nothing to the Government; however, there are still other lawsuits in which at least 23 billion pesos are being disputed.

“With this payment—which goes beyond the limits of the agreements originally reached in 2024—we will have covered absolutely everything the tax authorities demanded in this long legal battle. From now on, we owe nothing to the government, for any reason,” he stated, even though the administration of President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo denied the existence of such agreements.

“At Grupo Salinas we are convinced that, in order for things to change in our country, the first thing we must do is modify our way of thinking and call for a true cultural revolution,” the business group stated.

“To the Mexican people, we say: rest assured that Ricardo Benjamín Salinas Pliego and Grupo Salinas will always be allies of Mexico. We will never stop speaking the truth, seeking to restore to our nation and to every Mexican the prosperity that will reinstate us as a world-class example,” Grupo Salinas concluded.

This morning, Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo explained that Grupo Salinas formally expressed its intention to pay its tax debt on January 22. Following that communication, the amount to be paid and the application of discounts provided for in current legislation were under review, and the payment was finalized this afternoon.

“That’s the one currently on the table. It should be resolved this week. It has to be resolved this week. The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) ruled that the injunction is invalid and that the latest ruling by the collegiate courts is valid. In that latest ruling by the collegiate courts, for two of the companies in the Salinas Group, it was established that they can receive the benefits provided by the Tax Code. So the Tax Administration Service (SAT) presented the benefits they are entitled to, and they are evaluating whether they will be able to implement them,” Sheinbaum commented.

Total Play Asks Court to Withdraw Injunction

Total Play Telecomunicaciones, SAPI de CV withdrew the direct appeal in review 2526/2025, filed in April of last year against the payment of a tax credit exceeding 645 million pesos, reported Lenia Batres Guadarrama, Minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN).

“The announcement made today by the SAT, regarding an initial payment of more than 10 billion pesos, out of a total exceeding 32 billion, made by Grupo Salinas, represents a historic victory for the rule of law and a very encouraging message about equality in the fulfillment of obligations by Mexicans, regardless of their economic capacity,” the constitutional judge stated.

The debt was determined by the Tax Administration Service (SAT) on September 6, 2017 and has been challenged since then through various appeals.

One of these trials was resolved in March 2024 by the now-defunct Second Chamber of the SCJN, which ordered the Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA) to annul a sentence and issue another one that deducted 621 million pesos.

“The Federal Court of Administrative Justice (TFJA) reviewed its initial ruling, but without quantifying the corresponding deduction. Dissatisfied, the company filed a new appeal, which was denied, and requested a review before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN). The company requested to withdraw from this case, which was assigned to me,” the Minister revealed.

Complaint Before IACHR Remains Pending

In the middle of this month, Salinas Pliego, president of Grupo Salinas, went to Washington to meet with Pedro Vaca, Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the IACHR, before whom he filed a formal complaint against the Mexican State, due to “systematic harassment by the Government: fiscal, judicial and administrative persecution, coordinated to intimidate, wear down and silence those of us who think differently and raise our voices.”

“This sets a very dangerous precedent: the use of the state and organized crime as weapons to punish political opponents and restrict freedom of expression. In Mexico, they are trying to impose fear as a method of control,” he had stated.

The post Debt on the Installment Plan: Salinas Pliego Pays $10B MXN; $22B in Installments appeared first on Mexico Solidarity Media.


From Mexico Solidarity Media via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›