Geopolitics

https://archive.ph/DYLnm

https://archive.ph/2V8v0

https://archive.ph/9DoiI

https://archive.ph/rgo05

⚠️ Israel didn’t just strike Iran. It staged a deception campaign so advanced, it rewired the global playbook for war.

On June 13, 2025, Israel launched a preemptive strike that killed over 20 senior IRGC commanders—including Iran’s top military leadership. But this video isn’t about the missiles. It’s about the mind games behind them.

From Netanyahu’s staged vacation to Trump’s carefully leaked warnings, this operation was a masterclass in psychological warfare—a behavioral campaign designed to paralyze Iranian decision-making, mislead global media, and catch the world off guard.

In this deep analysis from a behavioral analyst’s perspective, we unpack: How strategic deception replaced diplomacy Why trust between global powers just collapsed What comes next if Iran builds the bomb And how this crisis could spark a regional—and nuclear—domino effect

🎯 This isn’t a recap. It’s a breakdown of the invisible war behind the headlines.

If you want to understand not just what happened—but how you were meant to perceive it, this is for you.

https://archive.ph/j7FRv

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31484336

Europe has fallen — not with a clash of swords, but with a whisper of forgetting. Modernity has stripped the continent of its soul, replacing sacred myths with consumerism and tradition with technocracy. Darya Dugina’s prophetic vision in “A Theory of Europe” reveals the hidden betrayal that led to the spiritual death of Europe — and how memory, tradition, and a return to Being might yet save it. In this cinematic journey, we explore Europe’s ancient roots, the tragedy of its decline, and the hope for its rebirth beyond Atlanticism and globalism. This is not just philosophy. It is a call to awaken. Timestamps: 00:00 – The Death of Europe 00:30 – The True Europe: Myth and Sacred Order 02:00 – The Fall into Modernity 03:30 – Atlanticism and the Great Betrayal 04:30 – Remembering Being 06:00 – Toward a New Europe 07:00 – A Prophetic Choice ⸻ If you believe Europe is more than a market, more than a bureaucracy, join the awakening. Subscribe for more in-depth explorations of geopolitics, philosophy, multipolarity, and hidden truths. Turn on notifications so you don’t miss new videos. #Europe #Philosophy #Geopolitics #DaryaDugina #Traditionalism #Multipolarity #ForgottenEurope #CivilizationCrisis #Metaphysics #FourthPoliticalTheory

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27675348

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The potential for a large-scale war between the United States and Iran, and the perspectives of Scott Ritter and Larry Johnson on the situation.

Key Points:

• Imminent War Threat: Reports suggest an imminent, large-scale US attack on Iran, potentially involving tactical nuclear weapons. This is driven by Iran's possession of 60% enriched uranium, which could be quickly converted into nuclear weapons.
• Iran's Actions: Iran's accumulation of 60% enriched uranium and statements by Iranian officials suggesting a near-term nuclear weapons capability are seen as provoking the US.
• US Justification: The US government views Iran's potential nuclear weapons program as an existential threat to Israel, justifying a preemptive strike.
• Consequences of War: Both Ritter and Johnson warn of catastrophic regional consequences, including potential escalation to a wider conflict involving Russia and China. They also predict devastating consequences for the Iranian people and regime.
• Alternative Perspectives: Johnson argues that Iran has a right to nuclear weapons and that the US has a history of aggression and false justifications for war. He also questions the US's assumptions about the fragility of the Iranian regime and the likelihood of a successful regime change.
• Role of Sanctions: Ritter highlights the weakening effect of long-term sanctions on the Iranian government, potentially making it more vulnerable to internal unrest.
• US Intentions: Both analysts believe the US is not genuinely interested in negotiation and is pursuing a regime-change operation in Iran.
• Russia's Role: Russia has warned against a US attack on Iran, but is unlikely to intervene militarily. The analysts discuss the strategic relationship between Iran and Russia, and how this could influence the situation.
• Unforeseen Consequences: Both analysts warn of unpredictable and potentially disastrous consequences for the entire Middle East if the US attacks Iran, including the potential for regional instability and the collapse of the Iranian regime.

Highlights:

• The passionate and sometimes heated debate between Ritter and Johnson, highlighting their differing perspectives on the situation.
• Ritter's strong warnings about the potential for a catastrophic war and his belief that Iran's actions have made a war more likely.
• Johnson's counterarguments emphasizing the US's history of aggression and the potential for unintended consequences.
• The discussion of the complex geopolitical dynamics involving the US, Iran, Russia, China, and Israel.
• The analysts' shared concern about the potential for massive loss of life and regional instability.

About Channel:

Dedicated to dialogue and peace!

At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.

This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.

We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27512622

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27501213

Generated Summary:

This YouTube video discusses the disconnect between the tough talk of European leaders regarding military strength and their actual capabilities. The main points are:

• Europe's Military Weakness: The video argues that Europe's military is significantly weaker than its rhetoric suggests. It highlights the inability of European navies to defend against modern weaponry, as exemplified by their dependence on the US to address the Houthi crisis in the Suez Canal. This contrasts sharply with the assertive statements made by European leaders about defeating Russia and building an independent military superpower.

• Financial and Political Challenges: The video points out the financial and political obstacles to Europe's military ambitions. There's a lack of unity among EU members regarding increased military spending, with countries like Italy and Spain resisting proposals for significant increases. The economic struggles of many European nations and the popularity of anti-establishment parties further hinder efforts to boost military spending.

• The Role of Women Politicians: The video notes the irony that some of the most hawkish voices in Europe advocating for war with Russia are women politicians, particularly within the German Green Party, despite their party's platform emphasizing a feminist foreign policy focused on diplomacy.

• Kaja Kallas's Controversial Actions: The video criticizes Kaja Kallas, former Estonian Prime Minister and current EU official, for her aggressive stance towards Russia and her perceived lack of consultation with other EU members. Her actions are seen as contributing to the fracturing of unity within the EU.

• The Illusion of US Support: The video suggests that Europe's assertive foreign policy has been fueled by decades of US military and financial support. Now, facing the prospect of reduced US involvement, Europe is struggling to reconcile its ambitious rhetoric with its limited resources and political will.

Highlights:

• The stark contrast between the strong statements made by European leaders and the reality of their military capabilities.
• The internal divisions within the EU regarding military spending and foreign policy towards Russia.
• The criticism of Kaja Kallas's leadership style and her aggressive stance towards Russia.
• The underlying economic and political factors that limit Europe's ability to fulfill its military ambitions.
• The video's concluding statement that Europe's tough talk is not backed by the necessary resources or political will.

About Channel:

Independent, Unencumbered Analysis and Investigative Reporting, Captive to No Dogma or Faction.