Green & indigenous News

124 readers
44 users here now

A community for Green & indigenous news!

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
801
 
 

Nlaka’pamux Nation member Red Deer Billie Pierre — who in 2023 was sentenced to 40 days of house arrest over her opposition to the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion — stands in front of an installation by artist George Rammell in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7. Photo by Aaron Hemens

Nlaka’pamux Nation member Red Deer Billie Pierre — who in 2023 was sentenced to 40 days of house arrest over her opposition to the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion — stands in front of an installation by artist George Rammell in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7. Photo by Aaron Hemens

Two Indigenous land defenders criminalized for opposing the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion (TMX) received support from community members last week — with an event helping fundraise the cost of appealing their 2023 convictions to the country’s highest court.

On Monday, the Supreme Court of Canada announced%20(By%20Leave)-,Docket,-Parties) its judges had officially received all documents needed “for consideration” of the land defenders’ request to appeal their guilty verdicts.

As they await a decision on their application, dozens of their supporters gathered on Coast Salish territories for a silent auction and 50/50 draw to raise more than $2,600 for Red Deer Billie Pierre, of Nlaka’pamux Nation, and April Thomas, who is Secwépemc.

Thomas told IndigiNews she was amazed by the number of people who attended and showed their support at the event on Feb. 7.

“It revives me, because I can see and hear from other people that this is not the end,” she said in an interview during the event.

“It’s not even a new chapter: it’s a whole new book; it’s the dawn of a new era.”

The fundraiser, held at the Vines Art Society’s venue in “Vancouver,” drew supporters of the pair from the local area and wider region.

The silent auction included donations such as pottery, apparel, art and trips. Its organizers said they plan to host more fundraising events, including in both land defenders’ home communities.

Items in a silent auction fundraiser for anti-TMX land defenders in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7 included pottery, apparel, artwork and getaway trips. Photo by Aaron Hemens

Items in a silent auction fundraiser for anti-TMX land defenders in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7 included pottery, apparel, artwork and getaway trips. Photo by Aaron Hemens

“This is a very layered fight that we’re up against,” Thomas added, “because it’s right down from the individual level, right up to fighting for collective rights and title.”

In 2023, a judge sentenced Thomas to 32 days in jail, and Pierre to 40 days under house arrest, after finding the pair guilty of criminal contempt.

The charges stemmed from an incident three years earlier, when police arrested eight people holding ceremonies near a pipeline construction site at a sacred Secwépemc village site at Sqeq’petsin (Mission Flats area).

Arrested alongside Thomas and Pierre was settler-ally Romilly Cavanaugh and Secwépemc Hereditary Chief Saw-ses, a survivor of the Kamloops Indian Residential School.

His daughter, Secwépemc matriarch Miranda Dick, was one of one of four people to be arrested at the site two days later, on Oct. 17, 2020.

During their trial, Thomas and Pierre argued their actions that day upheld Secwépemc law and arose from their cultural obligations to protect the health of their lands, waters, and salmon relatives for current and future generations.

But in her decision, sentencing judge Justice Shelley Fitzpatrick of the B.C. Supreme Court said “even accepting that Indigenous people generally have a duty and obligation to protect the land and water, that does not mean that they have a duty to oppose Trans Mountain’s pipeline.”

Pierre completed her house arrest, but Thomas was incarcerated for just one day of her sentence before being released pending her appeal to the B.C. Supreme Court immediately after her trial.

“I plan to fight it right to the end, because I’m not going to have them treat me like I’m a criminal, when I’m standing up for everything that I believe in,” said Thomas.

She added that her children, grandkids and other family members are worried about her serving jail time.

“But I’m actually not worried,” she said. “If I have to go to jail, it’s more alone time for me to strategize and get work done.”

April Thomas of the Secwépemc Nation speaks to supporters during the fundraising event in 'Vancouver' on Feb. 7. Photo by Aaron Hemens

April Thomas of the Secwépemc Nation speaks to supporters during the fundraising event in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7. Photo by Aaron Hemens

Indigenous law ‘had no place in the courtroom’

Early last year, Thomas, Pierre and Cavanaugh — the latter being a former TMX worker — appealed the Supreme Court of B.C.’s decision to the provincial Court of Appeal, arguing that Justice Fitzpatrick had made a series of errors against them during their trial.

One error they alleged was Justice Fitzpatrick’s dismissal of their lawyer’s “colour of right” argument.

That argument is a defence when defendants held “an honest belief in a state of facts which, if it existed, would be a legal justification” for their otherwise illegal actions, according to Courthouse Libraries B.C.

Ben Isitt, one of the land defenders’ lawyers throughout their legal battle, had argued the land defenders held the “honest belief” they were upholding Indigenous laws.

Isitt told the court his clients genuinely “believe they had legal duties in these circumstances arising from Secwépemc and Nlakaʼpamux laws to protect the sacred waters of the Thompson River — Simpcwétkwe (North Thompson) in Secwépemctsín — and the salmon people who relied on the health of the river to survive.”

But in July 2025, B.C. Court of Appeal Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon ruled Fitzpatrick “did not err” on any of the issues raised by the defendants, ultimately denying the three a chance of a provincial retrial.

The Court of Appeal said that the land defenders “failed to identify a particular Indigenous law they relied on to justify their contravention of the injunction.”

“That’s the way they looked at us: as being criminals, that’s it,” Thomas said during the fundraising event last week.

“Any Indigenous law that we were standing on had no place in the courtroom.”

Last September, Thomas and Pierre submitted an application to appeal their convictions to the Supreme Court of Canada, the country’s highest court.

Their new appeal, Pierre explained, seeks to challenge the court to reconsider “whether the colour of right defence can apply when Indigenous people act under their own laws and traditional authority on unceded lands — even if this conflicts with colonial injunctions.”

Pierre added they plan to argue the “B.C.” justices erred in “refusing to recognize Indigenous law as valid legal basis for action.”

If their Supreme Court of Canada appeal is accepted, then she believes the case would be “of national importance,” because it “speaks to the heart of who truly holds rightful authority over our unceded lands, and whether Indigenous law has force in Canadian court.”

Thomas argued other recent cases — such as last year’s historic B.C. Supreme Court decision upholding several Quw’utsun Nation bands’ title to an ancient village site on the “Fraser River” — could have a bearing on whether the Supreme Court of Canada accepts their application.

That’s because she said for too long “Canadian” courts have seen Indigenous laws as subordinate to colonial laws.

“But now everything is changing because of the Cowichan case,” she said. “I’m thinking it’s giving [courts] more of a challenge.

“We’re not just band members, we’re not just Indigenous people: We’re title holders to the land.”

Red Deer Billie Pierre and April Thomas pose with supporters during a fundraising event at the Vines Art Society centre in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7. Photo by Aaron Hemens

Red Deer Billie Pierre and April Thomas pose with supporters during a fundraising event at the Vines Art Society centre in ‘Vancouver’ on Feb. 7. Photo by Aaron Hemens

If the Supreme Court of Canada rejects their application to appeal their guilty verdicts, Thomas said she and Pierre intend to file another application with them, this time to appeal just their sentences.

They hope their legal battle will challenge how land defenders across the country are treated by the judicial system.

“Land defenders who are standing up Indigenous laws … they’re here for us and for Mother Earth,” Thomas said.

“They’ve done everything to support us, so in turn we have to be there to support them right to the end.”

She hopes their court struggle’s ultimate outcome sets a precedent for all Indigenous land defenders.

“When everybody came into our territory, we welcomed them under our laws,” she said, “to come stand up to protect and care for what we hold sacred.”

The post ‘I’m standing up for everything that I believe in’: Land defenders prepare to appeal TMX convictions appeared first on Indiginews.


From Indiginews via This RSS Feed.

802
 
 

Minerals form the building blocks of almost everything on Earth. They are made up of crystals—regular, repeating atomic structures that fit together like a three-dimensional pattern. When minerals deform, their normally ordered crystal lattices develop linear imperfections known as dislocations. These are small breaks or shifts in the atomic arrangement that allow crystals to change shape under stress. Some deformed crystals contain large numbers of dislocations, while in others they are sparse and searching for them is like looking for a needle in a haystack.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

803
 
 

Even as farmers shift toward less water-intensive crops, climate change is pushing agricultural water consumption upward in Central Asia. A new study by IAMO researchers shows that rising temperatures and atmospheric water demand now outweigh land-use changes. As a result, the pressure on already scarce water resources is growing in one of the world's most water-stressed regions. The study is published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

804
 
 

A new holistic monitoring system developed under the leadership of TU Graz measures boat waves with millimeter precision using satellite navigation data and sensors on buoys and for the first time allows investigations into the extent to which boat traffic, weather and other factors influence the ecosystem of lakes. Motorboats, sightseeing boats, shoreline obstructions and meteorological changes caused by climate change are putting lakes under increasing pressure. The weakening of lake ecosystems is reflected in a shift in species diversity and a decline in ecological functionality. This also affects three of Carinthia's largest lakes: Lake Wörthersee, Lake Ossiach and Lake Weißensee.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

805
 
 

The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday revoked its own 2009 "endangerment finding," a scientific conclusion that for 16 years has been the central basis for regulating planet-warming emissions from power plants, vehicles and other sources.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

806
 
 

Pexels harrison candlin 1279336Last Updated on February 12, 2026 (xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam), Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish) and səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh)/Vancouver, B.C.) The First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC) is deeply concerned about the confusion that has been created by recent media reporting and public commentary that incorrectly link the B.C. Supreme Court’s findings on Aboriginal title in the Cowichan Tribes decision with the […]

Source


From Intercontinental Cry via This RSS Feed.

807
 
 

Multicellularity is one of the most profound phenomena in biology, and relies on the ability of a single cell to reorganize itself into a complex organism. It underpins the diversity in the animal kingdom, from insects to frogs, to humans. But how do cells establish and maintain their individuality with such precision? A team led by Jan Brugués at the Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life (PoL) at TUD Dresden University of Technology has uncovered fundamental mechanisms that shed light on this question.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

808
 
 

The Yangtze River Basin, a global biodiversity hotspot, has endured severe ecological degradation over several decades due to intense human activity, leading to a marked decline in aquatic biodiversity. In order to halt this 70-year trend, the Chinese government instituted a comprehensive 10-year fishing ban on the Yangtze River in 2021.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

809
 
 

Climate change is reshaping life on Earth at an unprecedented pace. Across the globe, species are shifting their ranges, altering migration routes and breeding earlier in the year in response to rising temperatures. But while some of these changes appear adaptive, scientists are increasingly finding that hidden costs may undermine long-term survival.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

810
 
 

In a new review, researchers from the Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (XIEF) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences synthesized evidence and proposed a multi-objective optimization framework for designing farmland windbreak systems that can better sustain agriculture in arid regions. Published in Agricultural Systems, the review emphasizes that shelterbelts function as green, aerodynamic infrastructure that reduces wind erosion, mitigates harsh microclimates, and stabilizes arid cropping systems.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

811
 
 

Stewart Huntington and Amelia Schafer
ICT

Native leaders reacted with caution Thursday after the Trump administration said it is ending the immigration crackdown in Minnesota that led to thousands of arrests, violent protests and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens over the past two months.

“I’m relieved that this violent paramilitary force will be removed from our streets but I won’t believe it until they’re actually gone,” said Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, a White Earth Ojibwe citizen, in a statement.

President Donald Trump’s border czar Tom Homan said Thursday that “Operation Metro Surge” is coming to an end. He called the Department of Homeland Security’s effort, which began in December, the “largest immigration enforcement operation ever.”

The presence of thousands of immigration law enforcement officers in the state has been a flashpoint in the debate over Trump’s mass deportation efforts, flaring up after Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed by federal officers in Minneapolis.

Voices in the Native community were muted in response.

“We will wait and see,” said Robert Rice, the White Earth Ojibwe citizen who owns the Powwow Grounds Coffee house in Minneapolis. The Powwow Grounds morphed into the center of the Native response to the federal law enforcement surge, primarily as a collection point and distribution center for food and supplies for community members afraid to venture from their homes for fear of being caught up in an immigration raid.

The Powwow Grounds Coffee shop in Minneapolis, shown here on Monday, Jan. 19, 2026, has served as a refuge for the Native community and others as immigration agents have swept the community. Credit: Stewart Huntington/ICT

Flanagan noted the strong response in the Native community to the federal actions.

“I think Donald Trump underestimated the people of Minnesota and how we have responded,” she told ICT before Homan announced the end of the federal immigration crackdown in Minnesota.  “I’ve watched the Indigenous Protector Movement be on the front lines of looking out for folks through nonviolent, peaceful protest, helping to patrol communities and neighborhoods and keep people safe. That is truly at the heart of who we are. And Native people have been a really important part of the resistance to ICE in the federal government.”

In her statement Thursday, Flanagan added, “Minnesotans stood together against this chaos and cruelty. We never gave up on our neighbors. But I will never, EVER, forget nor forgive the fear, violence and chaos the federal government has laid on our doorstep.”

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation focused on the Minneapolis-St. Paul area resulted in more than 4,000 arrests, Homan said, touting it a success.

“The surge is leaving Minnesota safer,” he said.

Mike Focia, president of the Twin City Chapter of the American Indian Movement and citizen of the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, disagreed.

The ICE surge, he told ICT, “caused terror in our city and it’s going to take a long time to recoup from this, you know? Let’s just hope it’s over. And let’s hope any other city doesn’t have to fear what we faced.”

Ruth Buffalo, chief executive of the Minneapolis Indian Women’s Resource Center, told ICT from Washington, D.C., that leaders are waiting to see what happens next.

“We have been tracking the news back home in Minnesota closely today but everyone says we will believe it when we see it,” said Buffalo, a Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation citizen. “We are here to urge Congress to not provide any further funding or additional funding to (the Department of Homeland Security.)”

The announcement from the administration marked a significant retreat from an operation that has become a major distraction for the Trump administration and has been more volatile than prior crackdowns in Chicago and Los Angeles. It comes as a new AP-NORC poll found that most U.S. adults say Trump’s immigration policies have gone too far.

But Trump’s border czar pledged that immigration enforcement won’t end when the Minnesota operation is over.

“President Trump made a promise of mass deportation and that’s what this country is going to get,” Homan said.

Democratic Gov. Tim Walz said Tuesday that he expected Operation Metro Surge, which started in December, to end in “days, not weeks and months,” based on his conversations with senior Trump administration officials.

“The long road to recovery starts now,” Walz posted on social media after Homan’s announcement. “The impact on our economy, our schools, and people’s lives won’t be reversed overnight. That work starts today.”

Some activists expressed relief at Homan’s announcement, but warned that the fight isn’t over. Lisa Erbes, a leader of the progressive protest group, Indivisible Twin Cities, said officials must be held accountable for the chaos of the crackdown.

“People have died. Families have been torn apart,” Erbes said. “We can’t just say this is over and forget the pain and suffering that has been put on the people of Minnesota.”

While the Trump administration has called those arrested in Minnesota “dangerous criminal illegal aliens,” many people with no criminal records, including children and U.S. citizens, have also been detained.

Homan announced last week that 700 federal officers would leave Minnesota immediately, but that still left more than 2,000 on Minnesota’s streets. At the time, he cited an “increase in unprecedented collaboration” resulting in the need for fewer federal officers in Minnesota, including help from jails that hold deportable inmates.

Homan said Thursday that he intends to stay in Minnesota to oversee the drawdown, which he said began this week and will continue next week.

The widespread pullout comes as protests on the streets have started to wane, Homan said.

“We’ve seen a big change here in the last couple of weeks,” he said, crediting cooperation from local leaders.

During the height of the surge, heavily armed officers were met by resistance from residents upset with their aggressive tactics.

“They thought they could break us, but a love for our neighbors and a resolve to endure can outlast an occupation,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said on social media.

Forcia, the AIM leader, agreed and went even further. If it comes to pass that the immigration officers finally leave the territory, he told ICT his parting words would be, “Good riddance.”

ICT’s Jourdan Bennett-Begaye and The Associated Press contributed to this report

The post ‘Good Riddance’: Native leaders relieved but skeptical about plans to end immigration operation in Minnesota appeared first on ICT.


From ICT via This RSS Feed.

812
 
 

A new AI-based system can generate high-resolution soybean yield maps across Brazil using only limited local data, improving yield estimates for this key agricultural region and potentially providing strategic benefits to global soybean markets. The newly published work by researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign demonstrates an innovative approach that enables high-performance national yield estimates for Brazilian soybeans, even in areas where directly reported local yield data are very limited.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

813
 
 

While most of the world's glaciers are retreating as the climate warms, a small but significant population behaves very differently—and the consequences can be severe. A team of international scientists, led by the University of Portsmouth, has carried out a comprehensive global analysis of surging glaciers, examining the hazards they cause and how climate change is fundamentally altering when and where these dramatic events occur.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

814
 
 

As ocean temperatures rise due to climate change, corals and other sensitive organisms survive where temperatures are less extreme. But a new study from researchers at Florida Tech, published this month in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, found that local land and sea use have suppressed the benefits of these potential safe havens in some places.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

815
 
 

Freshwater streams, ponds and lakes across the United States are becoming saltier, and new research from the University of Missouri shows the damage may be greater than scientists once thought. Scientists at Mizzou's College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources found that road salt becomes much more deadly to freshwater snails when combined with the fear of natural predators in the water.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

816
 
 

Hydroelectric dams in Brazil’s Amazonas state have slashed fished populations by as much as 90% in some locations, according to a new a study based on on-the-ground research in partnership with riverine communities. The 2008 construction of the Santo Antônio hydroelectric dam dramatically reduced the natural flow of the Madeira River, which runs through Rondônia and Amazonas states in the northwestern Brazilian Amazon. As a result, species including pirarucu (Arapaima gigas), tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) and pirapitinga (Piaractus brachypomus) have largely disappeared from traditional fishing communities. “Fish need currents to navigate. They don’t need still water, they need moving water. And the Madeira River stopped flowing,” fisher Raimundo Nonato dos Santos, from the Lago Puruzinho community in Amazonas state, told Mongabay reporter Karla Mendes. “The impact was huge for us: the decline in fish stocks, the [milky] water remaining for many months within [the lake in] the community. It affected us a lot.” Dos Santos was one of more than a hundred fishers who collaborated with researchers from the Federal University of Amazonas on the 2023 study. They analyzed daily catch data between 2009 and 2010, before the dam was completed, and again between 2018 and 2019, after it was finished. They found a dramatic drop in the number of fish caught in the region following the dam. “The results show that the installation of the hydropower plants negatively affected the capture dynamics of several fish species by changing the capture periods and spots previously recorded,” the study’s authors wrote. In…This article was originally published on Mongabay


From Conservation news via This RSS Feed.

817
 
 

The Trump administration on Thursday revoked a scientific finding that long has been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change, the most aggressive move by the president to roll back climate regulations.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

818
 
 

President Donald Trump’s approach to climate change rests on one key premise: Greenhouse gases are not that bad.

This is a simple argument — albeit one that flies in the face of the scientific consensus on climate change — but it could have profound consequences. If carbon dioxide and the other greenhouse gases spewed by cars and trucks are not particularly dangerous, the logic goes, then they can’t be considered air pollutants as defined by the Clean Air Act. That means that the Environmental Protection Agency can’t regulate them, and landmark federal rules that cracked down on vehicle tailpipe exhaust and improved fuel efficiency are invalid.

The Trump administration took a major step toward advancing this argument on Thursday. The EPA formalized its repeal of the so-called endangerment finding, a federal rule from 2009 that found greenhouse gas emissions can endanger “public health and welfare.” This finding provides the legal basis for almost every major climate regulation, from auto exhaust standards to caps on emissions from power plants. While the Trump administration has already initiated individual repeals of many of those rules, the latest move seeks to go much further by preventing future presidents from reestablishing any such regulations to combat climate change.

“This is a big one if you’re into environment,” President Trump said at the White House on Thursday. Joined by EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, he called the repeal “the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history” and claimed, without providing evidence, that the action would eliminate $1.3 trillion in regulatory costs and would cause car prices to come “tumbling down.” He described prior climate regulations as a “green new scam” and blamed them for blackouts and inflation.

“That’s all dead, gone, over,” he said.

But the administration’s move may well backfire. Legal experts say that regulating carbon dioxide is well-supported by the text of the Clean Air Act — a fact that even the conservative Supreme Court has recognized in multiple cases, suggesting the court could rule against the administration if the repeal winds up on their docket. (A coalition of health groups has already announced its intent to sue.) And even if the court did affirm that the federal government can no longer regulate greenhouse gases under existing law, states and private parties would have an open lane to set their own greenhouse gas rules or sue over the harms caused by climate change, respectively, given that they would no longer be preempted by federal authority. That would create regulatory chaos, potentially forcing Congress to restore the EPA’s authority.

“I think this is where there is an incredible overreach from this administration, and I think that this is when they will be held to account in the courts,” said Rachel Cleetus, the senior policy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists, an environmental advocacy organization. “It’s just throwing spaghetti at a wall.”

The Clean Air Act requires the federal government to regulate “any air pollutant” that “endangers … public health or welfare.” In the landmark 2007 case Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that this mandate includes greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, even though those gases mix in with the global atmosphere rather than lingering in high concentrations at ground level, like most pollutants targeted by the law. Moreover, the Act specifically states that danger to public welfare could include effects on ”weather” and “climate.”

The late Justice Antonin Scalia dissented from the 2007 decision, and current conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have urged a reconsideration of the case, saying the Clean Air Act should only apply to “local” pollutants. Trump’s EPA revived that logic in its early proposals to repeal the endangerment finding.

Still, the Supreme Court has upheld its Massachusetts decision in several other cases. Even in 2022’s West Virginia v. EPA, when the current court overruled an ambitious program to phase out coal-fired power, the conservative justices did not argue that the EPA lacked the authority to regulate carbon. A few months later, when Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act, it amended the Clean Air Act to create grant programs “that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants,” a strong implication that the Act does cover those gases. The Supreme Court refused to hear a legal challenge to the endangerment finding as recently as late 2023.

“It seems to me unlikely that the Court would say that the EPA has no power to regulate carbon,” said Michael Lewyn, a professor of environmental law at Touro Law Center and critic of environmental regulations.

Read Next

EPA administrator Lee Zeldin at a podium

Trump’s EPA wants to demolish the bedrock of US climate regulation. It won’t be easy.

Naveena Sadasivam

Other legal experts expressed more uncertainty, noting that none of the members of the 2007majority are still on the court, and that at least one newer conservative justice, Brett Kavanaugh, has expressed skepticism about using the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases.

“Predicting the outcome of any Supreme Court case is difficult these days,” said Romany Webb, deputy director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. “I think it’s especially hard here.”

The EPA has delayed publication of its final repeal for months following the release of a draft proposal in July. In its draft repeal, the Trump administration cited a contrarian report drafted by its Department of Energy, which argued that responsibility for global warming isn’t certain and that its harmful effects may be overstated. A federal judge recently ruled that the report was drafted illegally, but did not strike it from the federal record, meaning the EPA could still cite the climate skeptics to argue that greenhouse gases don’t endanger public health.

“[The Obama administration] claimed new powers over the vehicles we drive, even though the best reading of the Clean Air Act clearly states otherwise,” said Zeldin at Thursday’s press conference. “The endangerment finding and the regulations that were based on it didn’t just regulate emissions, it regulated and targeted the American dream.” He condemned mileage improvements and efficient start-stop capabilities as “climate participation trophies.”

The agency chose to repeal the endangerment finding for “mobile sources” such as cars, but it did not repeal its separate endangerment findings for emissions from “stationary sources” like power plants and oil wells. Several groups representing polluting industries, including the American Petroleum Institute, or API, had urged the administration to focus on cars — likely because of the increased legal liability they’d face if carbon pollution is no longer subject to federal regulation. It’s unclear if this distinction holds water, though, since the other endangerment findings rely on the original 2009 finding for emissions from vehicles.

In response to questions from Grist about the consequences of the repeal, a spokesperson for the EPA defended the move as part of an effort to lower consumer costs.

“EPA is actively working to deliver a historic action for the American people,” the spokesperson said. “Sixteen years ago, the Obama Administration made one of the most damaging decisions in modern history…. In the intervening years, hardworking families and small businesses have paid the price as a result.”

Read Next

photo of Donald Trump pointing, a photo of a satellite view of Earth, and graphics of charts on top

The consequences of Trump’s war on climate in 7 charts

Grist staff

If the Supreme Court upholds the EPA’s argument that it can’t regulate greenhouse gases, it would open a Pandora’s box of complications. The Clean Air Act requires states to seek a special waiver from the EPA in order to set emissions standards that are different from the federal government’s, which is why California needed special permission to impose its now-cancelled phaseout of gasoline-powered cars. But if the Clean Air Act no longer applied to carbon, states could theoretically set their own vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards without approval from the feds.

The EPA tried to write around this difficulty in its filing, arguing that the Clean Air Act both prevents it from regulating carbon and also gives it the authority to preempt states from doing the same.

“I think that that’s going to be hotly contested,” said Amanda Lineberry, a senior associate at the Georgetown Climate Center who briefed the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA while serving as a lawyer in the Department of Justice. “That’s a delicate needle to thread.”

State-led regulation of carbon pollution would mean regulatory chaos. Automakers could be required to sell electric vehicles in California, the nation’s largest car market, but would have freedom to sell gas-guzzling pickups in nearby Idaho. Trucks in Massachusetts might need to be ultra fuel-efficient, but neighboring New Hampshire might not. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an auto industry trade group, has already worried over this possibility. In official public comments on the draft of endangerment finding repeal, it said that the end of federal preemption “[raises] the risk that automakers would be subject to multiple inconsistent regulatory regimes.”

“California and others that have been acting to promote the transition to hybrid and fully electric transportation will not back down,” said Mary Nichols, an EPA official during the Clinton Administration and former chair of the California Air Resources Board, the state’s climate change regulator. “But this is the most significant official roadblock the feds can set up to protect the oil industry’s dominance of transportation.”

If the federal government does stop regulating carbon, it could unleash a barrage of lawsuits. The Supreme Court ruled in 2011’s American Electric Power v. Connecticut that the Clean Air Act bars climate-related lawsuits against corporations under federal common law. As long as EPA regulates greenhouse gases, individuals can’t sue oil companies and power plants over their contributions to climate change in federal court. That’s why most climate lawsuits from states and individuals have played out in state courts, and why oil companies have long sought to move them to federal courts. In a Supreme Court brief last year, the American Petroleum Institute cited “the inherently federal nature of emissions regulation,” invoking the liability shield provided by the Clean Air Act. The endangerment finding repeal could shatter that shield.

Nevertheless, API pioneered many of the arguments now wielded against the endangerment finding. In 1999, the group held a meeting of industry lobbyists who strategized challenges to an early EPA proposal to regulate greenhouse gases, according to documents first reported by DeSmog and compiled by Fieldnotes, a research group focused on the oil and gas industry. At the meeting, the API circulated a legal analysis noting that there is “no clear-cut, explicit answer in statute” on the greenhouse gas question, and that “CO2 does not endanger public health and welfare and there are no cost-effective systems of emission control.” In 2008, after the Massachusetts decision, the group argued that the EPA had not produced “sufficient evidence of potential effects and harm,” and it opposed reducing tailpipe emissions in the U.S. on the grounds that this would not end climate change on its own.

Trump’s EPA used many of these same arguments in its proposed endangerment finding repeal, demonstrating how much his deregulatory agenda owes to the oil industry’s work. But now the API is taking a different stance, seeking to protect itself from federal lawsuits. In its comments to the EPA last September, it stated that it “believes EPA has authority to regulate [greenhouse gases]” under the Clean Air Act.

“There’s a reason industry directly regulated by these rules hasn’t been clamoring for the ideological extremes,” said Hana Vizcarra, a senior climate attorney at the environmental nonprofit Earthjustice.

If the flood of lawsuits and state regulations does become a threat to the industry, Congress could resolve the entire debate with a single line of legislative text, affirming in unambiguous terms that the Clean Air Act gives the EPA the power to regulate greenhouse gases. Republican lawmakers have no incentive to do such a thing now, but the unintended consequences likely to follow from endangerment finding repeal could someday force the legislature’s hand.

“It’s going to be chaotic,” said Vizcarra.

Naveena Sadasivam and Zoya Teirstein contributed reporting to this story.

Editor’s note: Earthjustice is an advertiser with Grist. Advertisers have no role in Grist’s editorial decisions.

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Trump just killed the EPA’s ability to fight climate change. It may backfire. on Feb 12, 2026.


From Grist via This RSS Feed.

819
 
 

Scientists have identified a crucial mechanism that allows plants to shape their vascular systems, determining whether they grow soft edible storage organs or develop the rigid woody tissue characteristic of trees. Published in Science, research led by the University of Cambridge and University of Helsinki, reveals the regulatory dynamics that guide xylem formation, offering new insights into how plants build both structural and storage tissues.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

820
 
 

Some genetic mutations that are expected to completely stop a gene from working surprisingly cause only mild or even no symptoms. Researchers in previous studies have discovered one reason why: cells can ramp up the activity of other genes that perform similar functions to make up for the loss of an important gene's function. A new study from the lab of Whitehead Institute Member Jonathan Weissman now reveals insights into how cells can coordinate this compensation response. The findings are published in the journal Science.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

821
 
 

For more than a century, the American chestnut, once a dominant tree across eastern North American forests, has been devastated by an invasive fungal disease that killed billions of trees in the early 1900s. A study published in Science shows that modern genomic tools can dramatically accelerate restoration while preserving the species' ecological identity.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

822
 
 

A new study from an interdisciplinary German research collaboration, led by the Haptic Intelligence Department at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (MPI-IS), reveals the secret to the gentle dexterity of the elephant trunk. The 1,000 whiskers that cover an elephant's trunk have unusual material properties that highlight where contact happens along each whisker, giving elephants an amazing sense of touch that compensates for their thick skin and poor eyesight.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

823
 
 

February 12, 2026 – Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on Wednesday announced a plan to address an issue the Trump administration is calling “agricultural lawfare.”

Rollins made the announcement at an event with officials from other federal agencies and a group of farmers and ranchers, coinciding with the release of the Farmer and Rancher Freedom Framework. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines agricultural lawfare as “the use of administrative, legal, and legislative government systems to adversely impact farmers, ranchers, and agricultural producers.”

Farmers at the event described a range of situations, including the use of eminent domain by states and utilities to seize farmland and one case in which former President Joe Biden’s USDA filed criminal charges against a farm over a fenceline dispute. (The Trump administration dropped those charges in April.)

At the event, Rollins called the problem “systemic,” but could not say how many farms may be impacted.“We are looking into it right now,” she said.

Under the plan, the USDA plan will establish a senior advisor on agricultural lawfare in the Office of the Secretary and previously launched a portal where farmers can report problems. The plan lists a variety of deregulation efforts already underway, including the rollback of environmental permitting and water pollution rules and the repeal of a rule that prohibits road construction on National Forest lands.

Rollins said that one of her top priorities is getting the Supreme Court to overturn a 2005 ruling that established that governments can seize private property if it’s in the public interest.

As part of the plan, the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) will speed up applications for conservation easements. The easements currently help farmers preserve farmland by permanently restricting development on the land, but Rollins did not say how they relate to lawfare.

Instead, Rollins suggested the lawfare agenda would dismantle the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts of the Biden administration. “Instead of us supporting the people that we need to support, we were supporting an ideology that had nothing to do with agriculture,” she said.

The grant contracts the USDA cancelled last year served Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized groups and included land stewardship workshops for ranchers, projects to link consumers to small farms, and training for young and beginning farmers.

Rollins also labeled a California equity task force report as an example of lawfare. The framework states that the USDA “will continue to conduct oversight on agricultural land redistributions in the name of ‘equity.’” (Link to this post.)

The post USDA Debuts Plan to End ‘Agricultural Lawfare’ appeared first on Civil Eats.


From Civil Eats via This RSS Feed.

824
 
 

An international team of scientists has discovered that a small, low-abundance protein plays a surprisingly big role in assembling carboxysomes—specialized bacterial microcompartments that enable efficient carbon fixation and underpin much of life on Earth. The study, published in Nature Plants, reveals how the shell adaptor protein ApN (also known as CcmN), despite being present at very low abundance, is essential for orchestrating the early stages of carboxysome formation.


From Biology News - Evolution, Cell theory, Gene theory, Microbiology, Biotechnology via This RSS Feed.

825
 
 

It is well documented that the Gulf Stream plays a pivotal role in the climate system through its transfer of heat, which ultimately supplies warmth to northern latitudes in the North Atlantic. What remains less well understood is how the Gulf Stream influences the climate system by transporting nutrients and carbon. These materials stimulate plankton growth, which in turn plays a vital role in naturally absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.


From Earth News - Earth Science News, Earth Science, Climate Change via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›