Collapse

3237 readers
9 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.


Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.


RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.


Related lemmys:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
276
277
278
279
280
281
 
 

Power density per unit of area is a wrong metric, unless you assume it is a proxy for physical infrastructure required to utilize the resource. EROEI does also not include the infrastructure, only assuming energy for extraction, refining etc. is also a proxy for it.

282
 
 

Carbon crediting is of course greenwashing, so nothing new there.

283
284
13
#269: How will “exorbitant privilege” end? (surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com)
submitted 2 years ago by eleitl@lemmy.ml to c/collapse@lemmy.ml
285
286
287
288
14
2025: A Civilizational Tipping Point (thehonestsorcerer.substack.com)
submitted 2 years ago by eleitl@lemmy.ml to c/collapse@lemmy.ml
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
4
Zero input agriculture (zeroinputagriculture.substack.com)
submitted 2 years ago by eleitl@lemmy.ml to c/collapse@lemmy.ml
298
2
The End of the Colombian Age (thehonestsorcerer.substack.com)
submitted 2 years ago by eleitl@lemmy.ml to c/collapse@lemmy.ml
299
 
 

Abstract Abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios (ASRS) following catastrophic events, such as a nuclear war, a large volcanic eruption or an asteroid strike, could prompt global agricultural collapse. There are low-cost foods that could be made available in an ASRS: resilient foods. Nutritionally adequate combinations of these resilient foods are investigated for different stages of a scenario with an effective response, based on existing technology. While macro- and micronutrient requirements were overall met, some-potentially chronic-deficiencies were identified (e.g., vitamins D, E and K). Resilient sources of micronutrients for mitigating these and other potential deficiencies are presented. The results of this analysis suggest that no life-threatening micronutrient deficiencies or excesses would necessarily be present given preparation to deploy resilient foods and an effective response. Careful preparedness and planning-such as stock management and resilient food production ramp-up-is indispensable for an effective response that not only allows for fulfilling people's energy requirements, but also prevents severe malnutrition.

300
 
 

Abstract To safeguard against meat supply shortages during pandemics or other catastrophes, this study analyzed the potential to provide the average household’s entire protein consumption using either soybean production or distributed meat production at the household level in the U.S. with: (1) pasture-fed rabbits, (2) pellet and hay-fed rabbits, or (3) pellet-fed chickens. Only using the average backyard resources, soybean cultivation can provide 80–160% of household protein and 0–50% of a household’s protein needs can be provided by pasture-fed rabbits using only the yard grass as feed. If external supplementation of feed is available, raising 52 chickens while also harvesting the concomitant eggs or alternately 107 grain-fed rabbits can meet 100% of an average household’s protein requirements. These results show that resilience to future pandemics and challenges associated with growing meat demands can be incrementally addressed through backyard distributed protein production. Backyard production of chicken meat, eggs, and rabbit meat reduces the environmental costs of protein due to savings in production, transportation, and refrigeration of meat products and even more so with soybeans. Generally, distributed production of protein was found to be economically competitive with centralized production of meat if distributed labor costs were ignored.

view more: ‹ prev next ›