China

394 readers
6 users here now

Genuine news and discussion about China

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
651
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17595490

In a significant political move on December 12, the Czech Chamber of Deputies' Foreign Affairs Committee adopted a resolution challenging China's interpretation of United Nations Resolution 2758. The resolution champions Taiwan's participation in international organizations, as per an official statement released by the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC).

The resolution, led by Czechia IPAC Co-Chair Rep. Eva Decroix and backed by key committee members, addresses Beijing's sovereignty claims over Taiwan derived from the UN resolution. It denounces China's military provocations in the Taiwan Strait and calls on the European Union to support Taiwan's inclusion in global forums.

This is the sixth parliamentary motion under IPAC's "Initiative 2758," aimed at countering China's influence and promoting Taiwanese representation on the world stage. Echoing initiatives from other regions like the EU and Canada, this resolution reaffirms a widening international consensus supporting Taiwan.

652
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17547361

Archived

Britain's financial regulator is taking longer than usual to approve fast-fashion retailer Shein's IPO [Initial Public Offering] because it is checking its supply chain oversight and assessing legal risks after an advocacy group for China's Uyghur population challenged the listing, according to two sources close to the matter.

Britain's Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner, a monitoring body of the interior ministry, has also raised concerns within government over a Shein IPO because of allegations about labour practices at its suppliers.

Singapore-headquartered Shein, which sells $5 tops and $10 dresses mostly made in China in 150 markets worldwide, filed confidentially with the Financial Conduct Authority in early June for a London listing.

[...]

The FCA (Financial Conduct Authority in the UK] is under no obligation to assess evidence presented by civil society groups, and will generally let investors take their own position, said Lorna Emson, partner at law firm Macfarlanes. If it did find compliance concerns, it would tend to address these confidentially with the company itself.

But NGO pressure is unlikely to fade.

"Regulators are being given more to think about – and are required to do so under the watchful scrutiny of the increasingly well-funded and litigious NGO and activist community," said Lucy Blake, partner at law firm Jenner & Block. NGOs are not alone in raising concern over Shein's IPO.

[...]

The Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner wrote to the Home Office and Department for Business in June about the IPO, according to previously unreported letters obtained by Reuters through a Freedom of Information request.

"Encouraging a company like Shein to float on the UK market inadvertently implies endorsement of poor labour practices and the prioritisation of attracting business to the UK over human rights abuses," Commissioner Eleanor Lyons wrote. The Home Office and Department for Business jointly replied that the FCA decides independently on listings and the UK has rules to guard against modern slavery.

Like other retailers, Shein must comply with incoming European Union regulations on forced labour and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act in the U.S., both of which are considered stronger than Britain's Modern Slavery Act.

[...]

Worker exploitation has been rife in supply chains of retailers and brands around the world, not just in low-cost fashion but also in luxury.

[...]

653
 
 

Archived

The term “revenge society,” or “revenge against society,” is used in China to refer to acts of violence against innocent civilians committed in blind desperation by those on the bottom rung of society to protest social and political injustices for which there seems no recourse. Emerging online in the early 2000s, the term has been applied in both mainstream (CCP-led) news coverage and online discourse to random attacks on unsuspecting victims, generally in cases where the perpetrators are thought to have disadvantaged and precarious positions economically and socially.

On November 11, 2024, dozens of Chinese were killed and many more injured as a 62-year-old driver unhappy about a divorce settlement plowed his car into a stadium in the southern city of Zhuhai, running down people on the sports track. Just five days later, eight people were killed and 17 wounded in a knife attack on the campus of a vocational school in Yixing, in Jiangsu province, a city famed since ancient times for its clay teapots. The suspect was reportedly enraged because he had failed an exam and not received his graduation certificate.

These cases were merely the latest in a string of brutal attacks in China killing scores of people in the fall of 2024. Collectively, they brought renewed discussion over a period of weeks of a phenomenon that has been a feature of Chinese media coverage of such cases since at least the 1990s — “social revenge” (报复社会). Not used in other Chinese-language contexts such as Taiwan and Hong Kong, “social revenge,” or “revenge against society,” is the idea that assailants, particularly from the disaffected ranks of society, have perpetrated attacks against innocent people in a desperate bid to air their grievances.

...

The term “revenge society” was regularly used through the 2000s. In August 2005, after a 42-year-old farmer with terminal lung cancer set off a homemade explosive on a bus in the city of Fuzhou, injuring 31 people, the magazine Lifeweekly (三联生活周刊) called the incident “individual terrorism” (一个人的恐怖主义), but noted that the incident did not clearly fit the pattern of “revenge against society.” People discussing the case, it noted, had been “unable to find the actual rationalization behind his social revenge” (却找不到他报复社会真实).

The term often seemed a way to frame or make sense of cases of incredible and sometimes mysterious brutality — particularly against the backdrop of a controlled media environment in which it was difficult to openly discuss many of the objective social factors behind these cases, including labor rights violations, forced demolition, and migrant discrimination.

...

The late 2000s was still a time of relative discursive space for China’s press, though always under the watchful eye of Chinese Communist Party “guidance.” In its own, indirect way, China Youth Daily was suggesting that more responsibility should be placed on the government in such cases, implying that poor governance, and failing rule of law, were factors behind issues of social injustice. “When revenge is committed against society, the government should understand that it can change society and transform it through good governance to achieve social justice at a higher level,” the newspaper wrote.

...

654
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17531122

Original version in German and behind paywall.

Buyers of solar modules from China may have to get used to higher prices. According to a report by the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), China’s solar companies have merged into a kind of cartel. The agreement aims to limit production in that there should be quotas based on the market share of the participating groups.

Exeprts says the initiative is similar to OPEC, the organization of oil exporting countries, just for solar modules.

A total of 33 companies, which account for around 90 percent of China’s production of solar modules, have agreed to reduce their production, the FAZ quoted by the Chinese business newspaper Yicai. Other reports also mentioned lower prices. The corporations apparently even agreed on an enforcement mechanism. The industry association will visit the factories to determine the exact capacities. Anyone who wants to start new factories in the future must shut down old ones.

In addition, penalties were agreed for breaches of contract. Companies that were among the early signatories of the pact would be favoured and receive higher production quotas. The German paper, however, also points out that the reports and industry rumours are currently not verifiable.

The move by China’s PV sector follows a similar move by its wind energy majors, who have also promised to collaborate to weed out ‘irrational pricing; from the market for the broader good of the industry, as per Business Times Singapore.

China’s solar majors dominate the global PV sector as well have faced a series of strong headwinds in the past 15 months, facing a perfect storm of overcapacity, followed by high inventory levels, price crashes and now, protective tariffs in many key markets, notably, India the US and possibly Europe soon.

655
 
 

The Presidential Office yesterday called on China to stop all “provocative acts,” saying ongoing Chinese military activity in the nearby waters of Taiwan was a “blatant disruption” of the “status quo” of security and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

Defense officials said they have detected Chinese ships since Monday, both off Taiwan and farther out along the first island chain. They described the formations as two walls designed to demonstrate that the waters belong to China.

[...]

Taiwan has been expecting drills following stops by President William Lai (賴清德) in Hawaii and the US territory of Guam during an overseas trip to diplomatic allies in the Pacific last week.

Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) in a statement said that China’s military actions were a “blatant disruption” of regional stability and Beijing should immediately stop all “provocative acts.”

She said that it is customary for presidents to go overseas and that “Taiwan’s normal international exchanges with other countries are not an excuse for China’s provocations.”

Meanwhile, the Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday demanded China cease its military intimidation and “irrational behavior” that endangers regional peace and stability.

[Edit typo.]

656
 
 

Cross posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17513531

Archived version

Researchers at the Lookout Threat Lab have discovered a surveillance family, dubbed EagleMsgSpy, used by law enforcement in China to collect extensive information from mobile devices. Lookout has acquired several variants of the Android-targeted tool; internal documents obtained from open directories on attacker infrastructure also allude to the existence of an iOS component that has not yet been uncovered.

  • EagleMsgSpy is a lawful intercept surveillance tool developed by a Chinese software development company with use by public security bureaus in mainland China.
  • Early samples indicate the surveillance tool has been operational since at least 2017, with development continued into late 2024.
  • The surveillanceware consists of two parts: an installer APK, and a surveillance client that runs headlessly on the device when installed.
  • EagleMsgSpy collects extensive data from the user: third-party chat messages, screen recording and screenshot capture, audio recordings, call logs, device contacts, SMS messages, location data, network activity.
  • Infrastructure overlap and artifacts from open command and control directories allow us to attribute the surveillanceware to Wuhan Chinasoft Token Information Technology Co., Ltd. (武汉中软通证信息技术有限公司) with high confidence.
  • EagleMsgSpy appears to require physical access to a target device in order to activate the information gathering operation by deploying an installer module that's then responsible for delivering the core payload.

Connections to other Chinese Surveillanceware Apps

Infrastructure sharing SSL certificates with EagleMsgSpy C2 servers was also used by known Chinese surveillance tools in earlier campaigns, the report says.

A sample of CarbonSteal - a surveillance tool discovered by Lookout and attributed to Chinese APTs - was observed communicating with another IP tied to the EagleMsgSpy SSL certificate, 119.36.193[.]210. This sample, created in July 2016, masquerades as a system application called “AutoUpdate”.

In a 2020 threat advisory, Lookout researchers detailed CarbonSteal activity in campaigns targeting minorities in China, including Uyghurs and Tibetans.

Significant overlap in signing certificates, infrastructure and code was observed between CarbonSteal and other known Chinese surveillance, including Silkbean, HenBox, DarthPusher, DoubleAgent and PluginPhantom.

657
 
 

Archived

Here is the full report (pdf, 28 pages)

China is rapidly advancing its global propaganda strategies through international communication centers (ICCs), with over 100 centers established since 2018 — most since 2023. These centers aim to amplify the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) voice on the international stage, targeting specific audiences with tailored messaging (a strategy known as “precise communication”). ICCs coordinate local, national, and international resources to build China's image, share political narratives, and promote economic partnerships.

By leveraging inauthentic social media amplification, foreign influencers, and collaborations with overseas media, ICCs advance China’s multi-layered propaganda approach. For instance, Fujian's ICC reportedly manages TikTok accounts targeting Taiwanese audiences, likely including a covert account that is highly critical of the Taiwan government called Two Tea Eggs. On YouTube, the same ICC promotes videos of Taiwanese individuals praising China. These centers are strategically positioned to promote China's interests during geopolitical crises, despite challenges like limited credibility and resource constraints.

[...]

ICCs employ various tactics to achieve their objectives. Social media operations form a core component of their strategy, with thousands of accounts active across platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok. Many of these accounts lack transparency about their state affiliations, enabling covert influence campaigns. Additionally, ICCs leverage foreign influencers and “communication officers” to amplify China’s narratives through user-generated content, vlogs, and experiential propaganda.

Collaboration with overseas media organizations further enhances ICCs' reach and legitimacy. Through actions like organizing foreign journalist visits to China, ICCs create an impression of organic coverage and offer an alternative to Western narratives. These partnerships — reportedly established in Australia, Brazil, Cambodia, Egypt, France, Japan, Russia, the United States, and elsewhere — are complemented by localized propaganda activities that align with China’s economic and geopolitical interests.

[...]

658
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17493220

Russia has imposed a 55.65% tariff on China-made furniture parts, a trade war salvo that has raised hard new questions about Moscow and Beijing’s “no limits” partnership, as per Asia Times, a media outlet owned by Asia Times Holdings Limited, a Hong Kong company holding multimedia and public relations company, which followed a story first reported by U.S. magazines Forbes. The Asia Times sees reason to suspect " the first salvo Russia-China trade war", as the paper writes.

Since autumn 2024, the customs department of Russia’s eastern city of Vladivostok has re-categorized furniture sliding rail components as bearing types, resulting in a drastic increase in tariffs from zero to 55.65%. The city now handles 90% of China’s furniture parts imports into Russia, the paper writes.

The Association of Furniture and Woodworking Enterprises of Russia (AMDPR) said the new tariff would bankrupt Russian importers of furniture components and create an additional 15% cost for local furniture makers.

AMDPR president Alexander Shestakov said importing a finished piece of furniture, which is only subject to a 9-12% tariff, is now more profitable than producing it domestically. He said the targeted components are currently not produced in Russia, which imports about US$1.3 billion of these furniture parts annually, mainly from China.

He added that furniture parts importers now must pay up to 2 to 2.5 million rubles ($19,969 to $24,962) worth of tariffs for each container, causing many to send them back to China rather than take delivery.

The move comes amid a troubling Chinese economy and slowing growth of the Asian country's exports which grew by 6.7% year-on-year in November 2024, missing market forecasts of 8.5% and sharply deteriorating from a more than two-year high of 12.7% surge in the previous month, reflecting ongoing trade tensions with the West.

659
 
 

Archived

The Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP) observes the fourth annual Uyghur Genocide Recognition Day, calling on governments, businesses, and civil society to strengthen accountability measures and deliver justice for the Uyghur people.

“Uyghur Genocide Recognition Day is a reminder of what is at stake—Uyghurs continue to face cultural erasure,” said Omer Kanat, UHRP Executive Director. “Words of recognition must be backed by concrete, enforceable policies to end complicity in these atrocities.”

The Chinese government’s ongoing repression includes mass arbitrary detention, forced labor, family separation, religious persecution, and the erasure of Uyghur identity and culture. Uyghur forced labor remains embedded in global supply chains, implicating major industries and corporations. Despite growing consumer awareness, transparency and enforcement efforts remain insufficient.

Global recognition of the Uyghur genocide has grown since the Uyghur Tribunal’s findings. Similar determinations have been made by the U.S. government and legislative bodies in Canada, the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Lithuania, Czechia, and Ireland.

The United Nations has also raised alarms. An assessment by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) found China may be committing crimes against humanity, while the UN Special Rapporteur on modern slavery found that some instances of forced labor may amount to enslavement as a crime against humanity. In 2021, UHRP led 50 genocide prevention organizations and experts in who said the treatment of Uyghurs “meet[s] the threshold of acts constitutive of genocide, core international crimes under the Genocide Convention.”

UHRP urges governments to enforce import bans on goods produced with forced Uyghur labor, and strengthen sanctions against Chinese officials responsible for human rights abuses. UHRP also calls on companies to conduct robust due diligence on supply chains and to end business relationships with entities linked to forced labor.

UHRP calls on governments to acknowledge their responsibilities under the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, and take all necessary steps to end the ongoing Uyghur genocide.

660
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17479535

Archived

China is urging colleges and universities to provide "love education" to emphasise positive views on marriage, love, fertility and family, in a bid to boost the country's flagging birth rate.

Beijing has been promoting various measures to try to make having children more attractive to young couples after China posted a second consecutive year of population decline in 2023.

China has the second-biggest population in the world at 1.4 billion, but it is ageing quickly, which will increase the demands on government spending in the future and put pressure on the economy.

College students will be the biggest driver of fertility but they have significantly changed their views on marriage and love, the Jiangsu Xinhua newspaper group said, citing China Population News, an official publication.

[...]

The measures would help create a "healthy and positive marriage and childbearing cultural atmosphere."

[...]

The state council, or cabinet, rallied local governments in November to direct resources towards fixing China's population decline and spread respect for childbearing and marriages "at the right age," although demographers said the moves were unlikely to resonate with young Chinese.

Around 57% of college students polled by China Population News said they did not want to fall in love, mainly because they did not know how to allocate time to balance the relationship between study and love, the publication said.

[...]

Universities could focus on teaching junior college students about population and national conditions, new marriage and childbearing concepts, it said.

Senior college students and graduate students could be taught through "case analysis, group discussion on maintaining intimate relationships and communication between the sexes."

The courses would be able to help them "improve their ability to correctly understand marriage and love and manage love relationships."

661
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17478245

Archived

It's no secret that President Xi Jinping's government uses technology companies to help maintain the nation's massive surveillance apparatus.

But in addition to forcing businesses operating in China to stockpile and hand over info about their users for censorship and state-snooping purposes, a black market for individuals' sensitive data is also booming. Corporate and government insiders have access to this harvested private info, and the financial incentives to sell the data to fraudsters and crooks to exploit.

...

"The data is being collected by rich and powerful people that control technology companies and work in the government, but it can also be used against them in all of these scams and fraud and other low-level crimes," [SpyCloud infosec researcher Aurora] Johnson says.

...

To get their hands on the personal info, Chinese data brokers often recruit shady insiders with wanted ads seeking "friends" working in government, and promise daily income of 20,000 to 70,000 yuan ($2,700 and $9,700) in exchange for harvested information. This data is then used to pull off scams, fraud, and suchlike.

Some of these data brokers also claim to have "signed formal contracts" with the big three Chinese telecom companies: China Mobile, China Unicom, and China Telecom. The brokers' marketing materials tout they are able to legally obtain and sell details of people's internet habits via the Chinese telcos' deep packet inspection systems, which monitor as well as manage and store network traffic. (The West has also seen this kind of thing.)

Crucially, this level of surveillance by the telcos gives their employees access to users' browsing data and other info, which workers can then swipe and then resell themselves through various brokers.

...

"There is a huge ecosystem of Chinese breached and leaked data, and I don't know that a lot of Western cybersecurity researchers are looking at this," Johnson continued. "It poses privacy risks to all Chinese people across all groups. And then it also gives us Western cybersecurity researchers a really interesting source to track some of these actors that have been targeting critical infrastructure."

662
 
 

Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense (MND) yesterday said China had nearly doubled the number of its warships operating around the nation in the previous 24 hours, ahead of what security sources expect would be a new round of war games.

China’s military activities come amid speculation Beijing might organize military drills around the nation in response to President William Lai’s (賴清德) recent visit to Pacific allies, including stops in Hawaii and Guam, a US territory. Lai returned from the week-long trip on Friday night.

Beijing has held two rounds of war games around Taiwan this year, and sends ships and military planes near the nation almost daily.

663
 
 

Archive

On November 28, 2024, China officially commenced operations at the newly constructed Kashgar Kargilik Mirdei General-Purpose Airport, a project described by Chinese authorities as a “pilot hub for integrated trunk and branch aviation networks.” While state media celebrated the launch as a step towards regional connectivity, Uyghur activists and analysts have criticized it as another tool of assimilation and control in East Turkistan [known also as Xinjiang].

...

Despite China’s claims of development, Uyghur activists have raised concerns that the airport serves Beijing’s broader strategy of cultural and demographic assimilation. “This airport is not designed to benefit Uyghurs but to further solidify China’s control over the region,” said an anonymous Uyghur rights advocate.

Critics argue that the infrastructure projects like this are often used to enhance the mobility of Han Chinese settlers and facilitate the extraction of resources from Uyghur lands. Additionally, they contend that such developments reinforce China’s efforts to centralize administrative control and expand military presence in East Turkistan. A Tool for Sinicization

Observers note that infrastructure projects in Uyghur-majority regions often align with policies aimed at Sinicizing the area. The airport’s emphasis on facilitating government and commercial activities suggests a focus on integrating the region more tightly into China’s national framework, rather than addressing the needs of its Uyghur population.

“This is part of Beijing’s systematic effort to dilute Uyghur identity and accelerate Sinicization,” said another activist. “While they tout development, the Uyghurs are left out, and their cultural heritage continues to be eroded.”

...

664
 
 

Archived

The rearrest comes just months after she completed a four-year prison sentence for her COVID-19 reporting. Zhang was detained again in August, and her lawyer was also held and intimidated by authorities soon after.

The rights organization 'Women Press Freedom' has closely followed Zhang’s case since her initial detention in 2020 and has consistently advocated for her release. Despite her brief freedom in May 2024, Zhang remained under surveillance and was summoned by police in June with threats of re-imprisonment for crossing vague “red lines.” Her latest arrest is a grave violation of human rights and part of a broader campaign to silence journalists.

Women Press Freedom demands Chinese authorities release Zhang Zhan immediately and end the persecution of journalists. "We also call on the international community to take decisive action in holding China accountable for these abuses and to demand the protection of press freedom, " the organization says.

665
 
 

Archived

Taiwanese rapper Chen Po-yuan (陳柏源) in a video showed how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) bribes Taiwanese online influencers in its “united front” efforts to shape Taiwanese opinions.

The video was made by YouTuber “Pa Chiung (八炯)” and published online on Friday.

Chen in the video said that China’s United Front Work Department provided him with several templates and materials — such as making news statements — with some mentioning Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politician Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and asking him to write a song criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party.

He said he had produced content for China as requested, but did not receive the royalties as promised by a Beijing-based management company for his song Chinese Bosses (中國老總), which is sung in an exaggerated Taiwanese accent with lyrics implying a pleasant life for businesspeople in China.

Chen said he also founded a company in China jointly with a business partner from the Jinjiang Taiwan Compatriots Friendship Association, who worked as his manager and later poached all his employees and capital invested in the company.

He was labeled as a fraud and a “Taiwanese independence separatist,” and attacked by Chinese Internet trolls, after he released an online video condemning his former business partner for betraying him.

“I finally realized the hard way that where I was staying [China] was not a place of democracy,” Chen said, adding that there is a huge difference between democratic Taiwan and autocratic China.

...

666
 
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17432212

Archived

Education is often viewed as the bedrock of critical thinking and intellectual freedom. Yet, in China, schools and universities serve a different purpose: indoctrination into the ideology of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). From the earliest stages of education to the halls of higher learning, the Chinese education system has been understood to systematically mould students to align with state narratives, enabling compliance and discouraging dissent.

In China, the education system is weaponized by the CCP to inculcate unwavering loyalty to its ideology. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Party’s narratives about Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan. Through manipulating curriculums and state-controlled pedagogy, Chinese schools and universities have transformed classrooms into arenas of political indoctrination, aiming to distort histories and suppress alternative perspectives.

This systematic indoctrination has not only entrenched authoritarian control but has also perpetuated harmful stereotypes and fuelled divisions that has hindered China’s relationship with the international community.

The CCP’s Narratives: A Manufactured Reality

From the earliest stages of education, Chinese students are taught that Tibet and Xinjiang are ‘inseparable parts’ of China and that Taiwan’s sovereignty is non-negotiable. School textbooks have known to whitewash histories of these regions, portraying them as historically Chinese territories and erasing the cultural and political autonomy they once held.

The CCP’s narrative on Tibet emphasizes its “peaceful liberation” in 1951, a euphemism for military invasion. Students are taught that Tibet continues to be backward, yet a feudal society rescued by Chinese intervention. The realities of Tibetan resistance, the destruction of monasteries, and the suppression of Tibetan Buddhism are unsurprisingly absent from these discourses. By presenting Tibet as a grateful beneficiary of Chinese governance, the CCP’s projection has attempted to reinforce its legitimacy while silencing the Tibetan struggle for self-determination.

Similarly, in the case of Xinjiang, elementary school textbooks have emphasized economic development and ethnic harmony, downplaying the harsh realities of mass detentions, cultural erosion, and systemic repression faced by the Uyghur population. These curriculums have projected narratives emphasising how Uyghurs have benefited benefit from Beijing’s policies, glossing over their lived experiences of surveillance and forced assimilation. Students are conditioned to see the CCP’s actions in Xinjiang as necessary measures to combat ‘extremism’, showcasing a nationalistic justification for human rights abuses.

The Limits of a Controlled Narrative

The CCP’s propaganda on Tibet, Xinjiang, and Taiwan, however also does more than distort history. It has for decades bred prejudice and suppressed critical inquiry, especially when it comes to the human rights abused the Party has conducted in these regions. By teaching students to view these regions through the lens of state ideology, the education system has entrenched harmful stereotypes and perpetuates systemic inequality.

For instance, Chinese students are been conditioned to see Tibetans and Uyghurs as ‘ungrateful’ or backward’ for resisting assimilation, reinforcing societal discrimination against these groups. Similarly, the vilification of Taiwan has bred undeniable hostility that has severely undermined the possibility of peaceful cross-strait dialogue.

However, perhaps the most concerning aspect of the CCP’s educational indoctrination is its suppression of dissent. Schools and universities have been equipped with surveillance systems to monitor student behaviour, and classmates are encouraged to report those who express ‘unpatriotic’ views, similar to practices that were exercised during the fateful ‘Cultural Revolution’. This has thus created an atmosphere of fear and conformity, where self-censorship has unfortunately become the norm.

The recent crackdown on students involved in labour movements and human rights advocacy illustrates the lengths to which the Party is prepared to go to silence dissent. These students, who dared to apply the Marxist principles they were taught to contemporary labour struggles, were met with arrests and expulsions, demonstrating the CCP’s hypocrisy in promoting ideology only when it serves its own interests.

The indoctrination of Chinese students has far-reaching consequences beyond China’s borders.

...

Moreover, the CCP’s education model serves as a blueprint for authoritarian regimes worldwide, demonstrating how control over education can be weaponized to sustain power and suppress dissent.

...

667
 
 

Archived

Corruption cases against village and town officials in China have soared in 2024, as a graft crackdown deepens in the world’s second-largest economy.

The number of cases against the directors of village committees, which run China’s smallest administrative areas, grew year on year by 31,000 – or 67.4 per cent – to 77,000 in the first nine months of 2024, according to official figures.

There were also a lot more graft cases involving township officials, which grew by 24,000 – or 36.9 per cent – to 89,000 between January and September, compared with the same period in 2023.

...

For the first nine months of 2024, China logged 642,000 corruption cases, higher than the 626,000 for the whole of 2023. The increase is seen at all five levels of the country’s administrative areas, which also include county, prefecture and province.

...

Fraudulent claims and embezzlement were the most common forms of corruption in villages in China, according to an analysis by Hunan University of 567 graft cases between 2015 and 2020 made public by the central authorities.

...

Experts have told local media that corruption in villages in China has been hard to root out due to weak oversight, a lack of staff trained in accounting and opaque financial disclosures.

668
 
 

Archived

The recent spate of murderous attacks shows the sickness of Communist China. Repression is only making the situation worse.

[...] The Communist Party’s reaction [to the recent mass killings in China] has been to censor news of incidents and prevent expressions of grief and mourning. These actions, by further bottling up emotions, are making a bad situation even worse.

Chinese society in the Communist period has always been volatile, and the Chinese people, who most of the time accept repression, periodically – and unexpectedly – explode. They did that, for instance, in October 2022 when thousands of workers suddenly fled a Chinese manufacturing complex making iPhones in Zhengzhou, in central China. “Something snapped over the weekend,” Bloomberg News reported at the time.

That incident quickly led to spontaneous protests across the country as workers, homeowners, students, the elderly, and others took to the streets for more than two months to complain about a variety of long-simmering grievances. In Shanghai in November of that year, protesters publicly shouted revolutionary slogans. “Step down, Xi Jinping!” they demanded. “Step down, Communist Party!”

Now, as the regime extends totalitarian controls over society, people are “trying to breathe”. They tried to breathe in June as four female college students in Zhengzhou decided to take an overnight 50-kilometre bike ride to Kaifeng for soup dumplings. The craze caught on, and in November 100,000 young were making the overnight treks. Authorities tried to limit the number of riders, and there were even reports that colleges and universities were restricting students from congregating and participating. For an insecure regime, everything is considered a threat to the ruling group.

...

The perception of unfairness has aggravated an already tense situation. “China’s economy is failing fast due to Xi Jinping’s policies of repression to preserve the power and privilege of the corrupt Chinese Communist elite,” Charles Burton, a former Canadian diplomat in Beijing, told me after the Zhuhai killing. “More and more people have lost their life savings in the collapse of the housing market. Young people suffer the soul-destroying impact of unemployment.”

669
 
 

Archived link

Summary

  • Deadly rampages are on the rise in China, including recent vehicle attacks and stabbings.
  • These assaults are seen as acts of personal revenge against an unjust society; social exclusion and lack of access to help mechanisms are considered as causes.
  • Growing economic hardships and a narrow definition of success contribute to discontent.

This November alone, at least three men carried out deadly attacks in China. A 62-year-old drove his SUV into a crowd, killing 35 people. A 21-year-old vocational student fatally stabbed eight women in his school’s female dormitory. Another driver plowed into a group of schoolchildren, leaving several injured. On Thursday, unverified reports and videos on social media pointed to yet another incident involving a truck, though official confirmation is still pending.

Such violent acts are becoming more frequent and more severe in China. But they are far from unprecedented. They carry a chilling familiarity, akin to how mass shootings are viewed in the United States. Yet, with China's strict gun laws, attackers often resort to knives, axes or vehicles as their weapons of choice. As is the case in the U.S., schools are a disturbingly common target, and the perpetrators are overwhelmingly male.

[...]

According to a 2019 study by researchers Ma Ziqi and Zhao Yunting from Shanghai, most violent offenders experience some form of societal exclusion before committing their crimes – whether from the job market, the education system or other institutional frameworks. Many lack access to mechanisms that could help them address their grievances, such as legal aid, mediation bodies or public forums. Others are excluded from social benefits, such as unemployment insurance, health care or even the right to enroll their children in urban schools.

[...]

High unemployment rates, an issue identified in the 2019 study, is even more pressing today. Youth unemployment alone is estimated at around 20%. Mediation systems are poorly developed, public discourse is tightly censored, and the legal system often appears arbitrary. Migrant workers – numbering in the millions – face particularly stark challenges as they are treated as second-class citizens in urban areas, excluded from many social benefits.

When the economy is thriving, such systemic flaws often go unnoticed. Economic growth offers the promise of upward mobility, allowing people to improve their living standards through hard work. This implicit «social contract» between the people and the Communist Party – where the Party retains political control in exchange for year-on-year economic betterment – has kept dissent in check.

But the ongoing economic slowdown has left many feeling abandoned. Optimism has given way to a sense of powerlessness. A growing number of Chinese citizens are asking how, after a lifetime of hard work, they find themselves drowning in debt – losing their jobs, their homes and even their families.

[...]

670
 
 

It is the first time chief executive Tadashi Yanai has directly addressed the contentious issue. China is a crucial market for Uniqlo not just for customers but also as a major manufacturing hub.

Xinjiang cotton was once known as some of the best fabric in the world. But it has fallen out of favour after allegations that it is produced using forced labour by people from the Muslim Uyghur minority.

[...]

Many global brands removed products using Xinjiang cotton from their shelves, which led to fierce backlash in China. Brands such as H&M, Nike, Burberry, Esprit and Adidas were boycotted.

Sweden's H&M saw its clothing pulled from major e-commerce stores in China.

At the time, Mr Yanai - who is Japan's richest man - refused to confirm or deny whether Xinjiang cotton was used in Uniqlo clothing, saying he wanted "to be neutral between the US and China".

His decision not to take a side helped Uniqlo to remain popular in China's huge retail market.

But speaking to the BBC in Tokyo about the firm's measures to be more transparent about where the materials in its clothes come from and how they are made, he said: "We’re not using [cotton from Xinjiang]."

"By mentioning which cotton we’re using..." he continued, before pausing and ending his answer with "Actually, it gets too political if I say anymore so let's stop here".

[...]

Retailers like Uniqlo are also facing intense competition from ultra-fast fashion as brands like China's Shein and Temu gain popularity with price-conscious customers.

But Mr Yanai says “I don’t think there’s a future for fast fashion".

"They’re producing clothes without any careful consideration which you only wear for one season. That is a waste of the planet’s resources."

He adds that Uniqlo's strategy is to focus on essential items that can be worn for years.

[...]

671
 
 

A string of prominent sanitary pad brands in China have become embroiled in a scandal about the quality of their products. The controversy began in early November when consumers complained that that the advertised lengths of many sanitary pads were misleading.

Then, a few days later, customers discovered that many pads had pH levels similar to textiles such as curtains and tablecloths that do not come into frequent contact with skin, potentially causing irritation or harm to users.

The anger only intensified when ABC, one of the companies at the centre of the controversy, responded dismissively to concerned consumers. ABC emphasised that it was complying with national standards, and reportedly replied to a complaint with: “If you cannot accept it, then you can choose not to buy it”.

Chinese companies have since apologised for their sub-par products, and ABC has even said that it was “deeply sorry” for its “inappropriate” response. But for many women in China, this scandal is about more than just defective products. It is part of a troubling pattern in which women’s health and dignity is blatantly disregarded.

[...]

672
 
 

Cross posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17365348

Archived version

China is pushing a flawed peace process while deepening economic ties with Israel.

[...]

Eli Friedman, a Cornell University professor who focuses on labor and development in China, explained some of the dynamics between China and Palestine in a recent webinar. It must be understood, he said, that “China is not responsible for the genocide” in Gaza; responsibility lies with Israel and the U.S., followed by other European powers. “The idea, though, that China is interested in the liberation of Palestine is also extremely problematic,” he added. “China is Israel’s second biggest trading partner after the United States, and actually not too far behind.” In particular, Israel and China cooperate extensively in technology and military sectors. “When the U.S. after 1989 in Tiananmen Square was saying, we can’t sell military equipment to China, Israel kept selling [them] military equipment — Israel is kind of a back door, and they’ve had a lot of cooperation in that respect.”

“China wants economic influence in the region,” he continued. “They want the system to continue to function smoothly.” Israel is a key player in the region that China wants to be able to relate to, therefore China “want[s] Israel to be able to continue to persist more or less as it is. Now, they also want an end to the occupation. China’s official stated position on Israel is a two-state solution … but they’re not going to do anything to fundamentally disrupt” economic relations with Israel.

[...]

“Chinese state-owned companies operate the port of Haifa, and they’re leading a big expansion of the port in Ashdod, which is just to the north of Gaza. They’re building an expansion of the Tel Aviv light rail system. So Chinese state capital is heavily invested in the literal infrastructure of genocide. If tomorrow, the Chinese companies said, ‘We’re going to shut down the port of Haifa and we’re not going to allow any weapons or materials to support the genocide,’ that would have an enormous impact on the development of things in Gaza. And they are not doing that. I think it’s important to note that, because there’s not a genuine, solidaristic interest in the liberation of Palestine.”

[...]

673
 
 

Archived link

**China has been supporting Russia’s economy since the start of the Ukraine war by buying its oil while supplying it with everything from microelectronics to washing machines.

Meanwhile, Beijing has been getting its own strategic benefit: a real-world case study in how to circumvent Western sanctions.**

An interagency group, set up by China in the months following the full-scale invasion, has studied the impact of sanctions and produced reports regularly for the country’s leadership, according to people familiar with the matter. The goal is to draw lessons about how to mitigate them, particularly in case a conflict over Taiwan prompts the U.S. and its allies to impose similar penalties on China, the people said.

As part of the effort, Chinese officials periodically visit Moscow to meet with the Russian Central Bank, the Finance Ministry and other agencies involved in countering sanctions, the people said.

The Chinese study effort, which hasn’t previously been reported, is emblematic of the new age of economic warfare unleashed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, where the lines between economic policy and geopolitical strategy are increasingly blurred. That trend is only likely to be amplified by Donald Trump’s second presidential term, where he plans to turbocharge the use of tariffs as a tool for negotiation and coercion.

[...]

674
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/5291198

Archived version

“Instead of taking responsibility for peace and security in the world as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, China is opposing our core European interests with its economic and weapons aid to Russia,” German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said in an emailed statement before departing Berlin airport on Sunday for her two-day visit to Beijing.

Vladimir “Putin’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine is a direct threat to our peace. I will also speak in Beijing about the fact that we cannot simply ignore this in our relations with China.”

The European Union is proposing to sanction several Chinese firms that it claims helped Russian companies develop attack drones that were deployed against Ukraine. Baerbock will meet her Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing to address this issue, her spokesman said. Germany’s top diplomat will also discuss the humanitarian situation in China, as well as EU tariffs against Chinese electric vehicles that were introduced in October.

675
 
 

Archived version

TLDR:

The Twitter account @whyyoutouzhele has allegedly been shadow banned by X (formerly Twitter) in relation to the 2nd anniversary of the White Paper protests, the rights organization Article 19 says.

The account is run by a Chinese artist living in Europe. It has played a key role in disseminating information about protests and other sensitive topics in China which are subjected to strict censorship by the state.

[...]

Few online actors are more influential in skirting China’s censorship efforts than Li Ying (李颖) who established the @whyyoutouzhele, ‘Teacher Li Is Not Your Teacher’, account in April 2022. Having lived in Italy since 2015, he used to post actively on the Chinese platform Weibo. Because he lived beyond the Great Firewall, people in China would reach out asking him to post sensitive content on their behalf. His Weibo account was shut down at least 52 times for crossing the line into social issues, until he was finally purged from the platform altogether.

In April 2022 he switched to X and by November 2022 was gaining hundreds of thousands of followers a week, as he became a clearinghouse for sensitive content, especially for information about the White Paper Protests. As the account became a respected source for disseminating and accessing sensitive information beyond the reach of China’s censors, Li Ying faced increasing digital transnational repression.

[...]

On Wednesday, 27 November, the blue tick verified ‘Teacher Li is not Your Teacher’ (李老师不是你老师) X (formally Twitter) account posted to its 1.8 million followers that it believes it had been shadow banned on the platform. The post speculated that the ban was in relation to the two-year anniversary of the White Paper Movement, a protest wave that rocked through numerous cities in China in November 2022 and saw numerous anniversary protests around the world over the past weekend.

[...]

On 28 November, [the rights organization] ARTICLE 19 ran its own search on X, using the account’s username @whyyoutouzhele and its Chinese account name 李老师不是你老师. The search did not surface the authentic Teacher Li account in either case, however both searches revealed multiple impersonator accounts, with around 20 when searching for the username. The search for the Chinese account name returned over 900 impersonator account results, but not the authentic account.

[...]

Shadow banning occurs when a social media platform intentionally limits the reach of certain content to its users, although platforms often deny shadow banning takes place. In its post, the Teacher Li account shared a screenshot from the platform claiming it had been subjected to a ‘search suggestion ban’.

view more: ‹ prev next ›