Uplifting News

18126 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
97
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Aatube@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world
 
 

Recently, we merry mods have been noticing many-a-comments being in the report queue for perceived negativity (the aim of the community being to provide "a break from the incessant negativity and rage"). What actions should we do about these, if any? Do we need a newsome another-rule for this?

Here's what I think: Some skepticism and scrutiny is always quite needed knowledge—especially against information that's actually untrue/misleading—and any bars I can think of for removing negative comments would apply to reasonable skepticism as well. Thus, the mod team is asking y'all to drop some bars!

Edit

Assorted examples of reported comments

Actually, you’ve missed the mark. It’s not whining about an advancement, it’s legitimate criticism of the US health industry. He’s just saying what we all know to be true which is that regardless of technological improvements, lifesaving care will continue to be ruinously expensive for those that are able to access it and gatekept from many others.

If you have a problem with comments like these undermining celebration of scientific progress, then maybe you should think about the structural political issues that lead people to disillusionment and cynicism rather than labeling people as conspiracy theorists.

You know “big red“ voted for Trump. It’s a cute story, but I hope he gets what he voted for In the end

It’s too bad that curing patients is not a sustainable business model. Even if this did work we would only ever see it developed if you had to take it twice a month for the rest of your life in order to survive.

Edit: sorry, I just noticed this is in Uplifting News. So, let’s be optimistic. Maybe global capitalism will collapse and governments will start trying to take care of people.

Nobody said anything about ICE, we’re talking about the military known for bombing weddings in multiple middle eastern countries and then bombing ambulances when they respond.

If you have the money to commit atrocities in a dozen countries at once, you have money to spare.

That’s .world for you; complaining about Reddit while trying to recreate it exactly

It’s very sad to see hype like this. They only had 30 enrolled, this was just a safety study, and while the data looks promising, there is certainly not enough statistical power, which is why there is no approval yet.

Shame on the BBC. If you are going to quote invesigators, you should state that they have paid consultancy deals with UniQure. The same two people were equally excited about a Roche therapy years ago…

But UniCure stock went up 200% today, which is the point.

2
39
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago) by Aatube@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world
 
 

Since it's slightly less than easy to glean the rules from the sidebar, here's an itemized collection of rules. For example, the schadenfreude rule can be referred to as a)1.


a) Posts must be uplifting.

  1. This excludes schadenfreude.^[1]^
    Try !politicaloptimism@piefed.social instead if the subject is powerful people.

b) Posts must not overtly deal with toxic politics.^[1]^

c) Links must not be low-effort.^[1]^

  1. Links must not go to a copy of a copy of a copy.
    (Try finding the original source instead! Links do not have to be textual, so there's no need to find a content farm to post a video.)
  2. Posts must not be fake news.

d) Comments should foster open discussion.

  1. Negativity/spreading doom and gloom in comments is currently allowed.^[2]^
  2. Comments be civil and must not include personal attacks towards other commenters or non-public figures. (Swearing is allowed as long as it isn't directed towards those.) Please engage with others' points respectfully and fully.
    The rest of the lemmy.world instance rules apply here as well.

[1] https://lemmy.world/post/30918729
[2] https://lemmy.world/post/36475489

If there's something you think that should be on here but isn't, feel free to say so!

3
 
 

I know it's February already and many of use have long-abandoned our resolutions, but researchers have identified steps to not only help you keep them going for longer, but also build more meaning into your day-to-day life. The TL;DR:

  1. Look back before moving forward. Before setting goals, reflect on the previous year. Ask:
  • what am I proud of or grateful for?
  • what lifted my energy or sense of purpose?
  • what drained it?
  • what did I avoid that actually mattered?
  1. Pick two or three areas that matter to you
  2. Arrange your environment so the right behaviours are easy
4
 
 

From Somalis in Minneapolis to Nepalis in New York City, immigrant communities turn to trusted local news sources. Here’s our regular ranking of the top 25 nonprofit news sites in the United States.

5
6
7
8
 
 

“We were able to show through our hair samples what the lead concentrations are before and after the establishment of regulations by the EPA,” said demographer #link("https://profiles.faculty.utah.edu/u0030780")[Ken Smith];, a distinguished professor emeritus of family and consumer studies. “We have hair samples spanning about 100 years. And back when the regulations were absent, the lead levels were about 100 times higher than they are after the regulations.”

9
10
11
 
 

Editorialized title, because it makes no sense to focus on his three year celibacy. Also a four month old article, but I figured it was still good to see.

*edit
changed 'good' to 'fine' because that was just a huge missed opportunity.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
 
 

Thanks to the new drilling tech geothermal power becomes feasible in places that weren't fit for it before. Estimates suggest that cost wise, it can compete with fossil fuel and renewables in the near future

19
 
 

The move came as dozens of immigrants arrested in Minneapolis were shipped to the Torrance County Detention Facility, which is run by private prison operator CoreCivic, in New Mexico. One of them, 33-year-old Jorge Cordoba, told Source NM he lived in Minneapolis for more than 20 years and was in the country legally under protected Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival status.

Residents who spoke during public comment were overwhelmingly in favor of the bill, though Otero County Attorney R.B. Nichols spoke during a virtual public comment period to oppose the bill. He said it would disproportionately harm economies in regions like Otero or Torrance counties that rely on detention centers for jobs.

The bill’s supporters, though, contend that it would not force these facilities to shut down. Many detention centers contract with other law enforcement agencies, such as the U.S. Marshals, and would still detain people accused of crimes.

“We’re disentangling ourselves from the immigration industry that’s been…a money-making, for-profit machine off the backs of our neighbors and families and friends,” Chávez, one of the bill’s sponsors, told Source NM. “I think that it sends a message to the rest of the country.”

20
21
22
23
 
 

Currently, only lobbyists working more than 28 hours a month are required to publically register with the commissioner of the Commissioner of Lobbying.

https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/guest

A lot of lobbying in Canada is undisclosed.

Let's say you are a lobbyist for an AI company. The AI minister (yes, that's a real thing) wants to introduce a bill that you really don't like.

  • You write a letter to the AI minister to invite him for dinner. (1hour)

  • You spend one morning to prepare what you will talk about (3hours)

  • His office calls you to change the date (15 minutes)

  • You call back his office to confirm the date and location (15 minutes).

  • You go to the restaurant wisth the minister (3 hours)

  • He agrees to meet you one week later in his office to discuss changes to the bill (2 hours).

That's less than 9 hours and 30 minutes. It's below the 28 hours threshold so you don't have to disclose anything.

On January 19, 2026, Canada will become a slightly less corrupt country.

The threshold below which no registration is required will change from 28 hours to 8 hours over a four-week period. More people will be required to register.

The system is still a disaster, but at least it's an improvement.

24
25
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/56777651

view more: next ›