GenZedong

8 readers
1 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

Serious posts can be posted here and/or in /c/GenZhou.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
276
 
 
277
 
 

This is about the study that is currently pinned to the top of lemmygrad. I went a bit more in depth.

278
279
 
 
280
 
 

Singaporean diplomat, Professor Kishore Mahbubani recently traveled to Beijing. In this video, he explains why the 21st century will be an Asian century, and why the West is failing to understand Asia and legging behind horribly.

281
 
 

I know the two groups view post-Mao China in very different ways. MLM denounce everything, claiming that the entire party has succumbed to capitalist revision, that they were all pretend communists who truly believed in nothing.

Or the views of MLs who say that the CPC was right to open up like the NEP, to improve material conditions in order to develop to a higher stage of socialism. But how does this contradict anything from Mao?

How does this contradict New Democracy? Coalitions formed through the class system under the leadership of the CPC. That sounds like Deng propaganda!

Deng allowed for the creation of a new bourgeoisie that it nonetheless kept under the rule of the Party. Xi currently shows this best of all with the anti-corruption campaigns. If these billionaires lived in any other country they'd be the ruling class, but in China they're not. It still is a DotP.

How is the improvement of material conditions not a vitally Maoist position?

Regardless of your opinions on the Cultural Revolution, for most of Mao's life his theory was incredibly pragmatic. What mattered most was actually creating a proletarian state, and so most of his ideas comes from that war perspective.

And even the name Dengism, it's not a real -ism. Deng is right, he was a a committed Marxist, but his thought is really just a continuation of Mao and Lenin. As such modern China is not Dengist but are still committed to ML.

But again why is there this ideological split? It seems the only aspect of MLM that ML reject is a denunciation of the CPC. Because I don't think there's anything from Mao that contradicts or majorly reverses previously held ideas. (thus as ML inverting the idea of revolution in the imperial core to outside it in the periphery). In the same way I don't see much of the reform phase that is antithetical to anything from Mao.

282
 
 

Haverim ( Comrades ) !

A new Hakim video just dropped ! ☺️

283
284
 
 

I heard the meeting between Xi and Kissinger was to discuss ways to mitigate the fallout of a pending war.

285
 
 

I don't know if I'm being overly paranoid or what, but I can't tell if it's safe for me openly publish some spicy stuff under my legal name. Not to sound like I think I'm the most popular girl at school, but don't most prominent leaders go by pseudonyms the rest of their lives? Not saying I'm Lenin but...

EDIT: Alright comrades you've won me over. New name, new me.

286
 
 

Over the past two years I've been watching a lot of Bilibili to improve my mandarin, and I wanted to share some of the things I've noticed in no particular order.

Chinese social media has a LOT of high quality resources to study marxism and you can find in-depth analyses of various Marxist works such as das kapital. However, there is generally a greater interest in nationalism rather than marxism, which has been pointed out here before. There is also some general hostility towards Vietnam. One of the reasons for this dislike seems to be that Vietnam is supposedly cozying up to the US, and had apparently hosted an american navy ship. There isn't however much dislike towards the DPRK, and people tend to think of it as a generally happy country although perhaps a bit quirky and closed off. Of course, Chinese youth is much more interested in kpop and south korean culture overall.

There is a lot of content from Youtube that will be reuploaded directly to Bilibili. They tend to have a title prefaced with: "油管百万播放量" (Basically meaning: "this video has millions of views on Youtube"). Even some very political Youtube videos will be uploaded to Bilibili, for example, I saw someone who reuploaded a debate between Infrared haz and Vaush with Chinese subtitles. The comments pretty much said: "This is how americans debate politics? Why are they screaming so much? Why is this vaush guy pretending to be a leftist?". I've also seen some reuploaded low quality 'social credit' memes (you can find it by searching 社会信用 on Bilibili) as well as some discussion around how westerners obsess over the social credit system.

弹幕 (Dànmù) is a feature on Chinese social media that allows users to leave comments on the screen of the video itself (so you will see comments going across the screen while watching a video). At first I hated these, so I turned them off, but I've actually started to really like this feature and now I kind of wish it was on Youtube as well. (Yes I know it makes my attention span even worse, since besides just watching a heavily edited video, I'm also seeing people's reaction at the same time to keep me less bored)

I've been consuming a lot of content relating to China's space program, and I've noticed that there are a lot of people who seem to believe that the US moon landing was fake. You'll never see content creators themselves say that it was fake, but whenever the US moon landing comes up, there will always be dànmù talking about how it's faked. I do think this is a bit weird, since Chinese social media will usually remove stuff that's non-scientific, but to be fair, there has been some funny jokes coming out of this. In the comments of NASA's Chinese channel where they showed off their plans for the artemis program, the top comment was like: "This time the moon landing will feature next generation 4k photorealistic CG, with revolutionary new filming techniques and special effects that will make you truly believe that the US landed on the moon"

Criticism of the government is quite normal but it isn't comparable to the way we in the west criticize our governments. People will usually focus on criticizing specific policies or socioeconomic developments rather than the ruling government, since people are generally happy with the government as a whole. I've found people criticizing the Chinese education system, how the society is afraid of sexual education, how household debt is rising, how youth unemployment is rising, etc.

As for some of my favorite content to watch, I'll start by highlighting the building sphere of Bilibili, where people build lots of cool stuff. For example look at this sci-fi desk thing. I also found this great video that does a really great job of summarizing the science of language learning.

Also, there are so many amazing free university lectures accessible through Bilibili, covering things like Das Kapital, Machine Learning, PID control systems, and more. Maybe its just my recommended page, but Chinese social media seems to be much more obsessed with educational/science/news content rather than the cheap try not to laugh content which floods Youtube.

287
288
 
 

Excerpted with emphasis:

"In a 2014 report titled “The EU’s Energy Security Made Urgent by the Crimean Crisis,” the EU Parliament outlined the challenges that lay ahead of enforcing sanctions on Russia. An interesting aspect of this report conveys salient aspects of the bloc's decision-making. By contrasting both the short-term and long-term implications of anti-Russian sanctions on the bloc's economy, we may discern the rationale for the EU's decision: in the short-term, the EU would be faced with “several obstacles” linked to the construction of new import terminals, the conversion of electric plants to other energy sources, the substitution of Russian gas imports with those from Norway, Algeria, and Qatar which would result in external shocks and “recession effects” to the EU economy, while in the long-term, the sanctions promise to strengthen Europe’s security, forging trade alliances with “new countries,” increasing renewable energy production, and other means of reducing energy dependency to Russia.

The point remains that Europe restructures power balances by forcing countries into submission and drawing future resources for cheap costs. The principle governing the EU’s decision-making is that the temporary erosion of European welfare – the current security of Europe’s working classes -- is meant to strengthen the bloc’s autonomy and boost European working class and capital security in the long run. The European working class continues to partner with capital since its colonial wars and it benefits from the power generated imperialist dividends. That rationale is the very same one being applied in the context of the Ukrainian conflict -- that the temporary contraction of the Eurozone is meant to enhance Europe's security and economy in the long run.

... Knowing well the consequences that bear upon its economy, namely the decoupling from Russian gas and Russian investments, it is instinctive to assume that the EU has beaten a new record for the most irrational decision-making. But arithmetic imposed on processes is misleading and considering the dynamic picture, more power garnered by Europe will resituate it at the helm of the international order. Once in power, Europe dictates to the world its terms of trade. When we consider the social aspects involved in the price formation of commodities -- which in this particular context involves the sale of Russian gas for cheap prices, a decapitated Russia will sell its future gas for prices even lower than they were prior to the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict.

This is important to consider because price formation is relative to the structures of power, which emanates from the resultant of social or power relations. Market powers provide the social context in which people come to relate to one another, and thus, how the terms of exchange are legitimized. As a matter of fact, the reason why Russian gas became so cheap after the Soviet Union collapsed is owed to the ideological defeat of the Soviet ideology. The establishment of the petrodollar system in 1973 was a turning point in history which saw the US consolidate the dollar as the dominant global reserve currency, causing a severe drop in the Soviet Union's income and affecting the bloc's ability to sustain itself as a autonomous economy.

The history of Europe provides context to how the European working class relates to the capitalists of Europe. To a large extent, the working class of Europe has always been the soldiers of the Empire. By committing crimes against humanity, colonizing peoples, pillaging their resources, and carrying out genocides and ethnocides of immeasurable scale, the European working class reproduces itself by war just as capital does.

The EU has done well at washing the blood off its hands from centuries of looting and pillaging the South as it continues to vaunt its image of moral and cultural superiority and has done so by masterfully subjugating the discourse on human rights to serve its own ends. So much of Europe's wealth was in fact generated by the relation of looting the South. The European working class makes a living out of killing by increasing its power and partnership with capital. But the presence of a strong Russia has always posed a threat to Western interests, especially as it holds sway over Eurasia.

With the ideological defeat of the Soviet Union and the ongoing expansion of NATO, this pattern continues to take hold in the 21st century. But with the US bearing a leadership role within the alliance, many come to view the EU as being dragged into a war that is not theirs. Whether the US is exerting pressure on the EU or not, it is a certainty that whatever decisions being made are meant to safeguard the rules-based order -- an order characterized by the primacy of Western culture and civilization over that of the South, which in turn pays dividends to the European working class itself.

Simply put, it would be far off the mark to assume that the US bears full responsibility for a conflict that the EU has supposedly nothing to do with. Not only the Western alliance is all one and the same, but the imperialism-based order renders war as the only viable option against an autonomous Russia. Rivaling the primacy of the rules-based order is rivaling the terms of exchange as defined by the West, and rivaling the terms of exchange is rivaling US-EU military superiority.

The same applies in the context of waging a trade war with China. Reports have claimed that the US has been pressuring the EU to decouple from China. But neither the EU nor the US has thus far dared to initiate such a move. It is an indisputable certainty that doing so would wreak havoc on Western businesses that rely on Chinese supply chains and manufacturing power. But it is precisely this overreliance on China that the West is aiming to overturn.

Nevertheless, with resistance enacted by Russia and other global players, the prospects for a world where development would break off from waste accumulation -- the production sphere of global industries that drive the destruction of the Global South -- seem to be coming further in sight."

289
290
 
 

My thoughts on the Jonah Hill/Sarah Brady situation and how emotional abuse can be overlooked.

291
 
 

It's fascinating to me how the same people who like to do purity tests for China or Vietnam claiming they're not actually communist are also the ones who'll defend places like US or Canada saying yeah it's not perfect, but it's the ideal of the system that matters.

It's such an incredible example of cognitive dissonance. These people able to recognize that their own system doesn't live up to the ideal they have in their heads, but still treat it as a valid interpretation of the idea, but when it comes to a system they dislike then the same logic doesn't apply all of a sudden.

292
293
294
 
 

Wonder why.

I mean, I know why, but

295
 
 

Women were at the forefront of the socialist uprising that overthrew the US-backed Somoza dictatorship and made up a third of the Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional's combatants.

"The revolution cannot be done without the participation of women" – FSLN Commander Doris Tijerino

296
70
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml
 
 

PRC: publicly announces new Five Year Plan

Western newspapers: What Is China Planning? Experts Are Baffled

…five years later…

PRC: completes Five Year Plan

Western newspapers: The opacity of its system enables the country to routinely shock the rest of the world

297
 
 

this bit was the cherry on top

298
299
300
 
 

New eco socialist book which I intend to buy, and a related game.

view more: ‹ prev next ›