chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
1951
 
 
1952
 
 

I get the sense the New York Times really doesn't like RFK Jr. very much.

https://archive.ph/MyGha

1953
1954
 
 

Best Interview Ever. Death to the Royal Family.

1955
 
 

feast-1feast-2

Sadly it seems they don't truly understand us (minimum 2 people required to order the Western Grill platter)

1956
 
 
1957
 
 
1958
 
 
1959
1960
 
 
1961
 
 
1962
 
 

I know it's spelled "minute". That was a typo and I am not going to fix it.

1963
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2441630

Definitely check this out.

I'm interested in their repository of data for Autistic people.

Thoughts on the interview?

Listen to it for an hour while you're doing other things.

1964
 
 
1965
 
 

I also recently learned this fact about the audio that really got to me. After the researchers recorded this, they played it back, then he excitedly flew over, thinking he just heard another ʻōʻō bird.

1966
 
 
1967
 
 
1968
 
 

monke-return Retvrn to tradition. santos-paparazzi

1969
 
 

It looks like Lee Fang is part of some kind of limited hangout thing where they turn this into a vaccine issue. Whenever something can't be omitted it's turned into a tug of war issue nobody wants to spend time thinking about because it's annoying discourse. Just my hypothesis. Still, he's the person I heard about this from first in my RSS feed.

The fact is none of us actually have a threat model for what the people coming at our communities from these orgs look like. All that is put into the code of conduct is a set of rules for slapfighting with whoever is put into the cage next to us. That's putting everyone right where these organizations want.

From the promotional material at least, we can glean security by obscurity is something they expect targets to seek out and something that clients are looking to pay to get past by default, as it harbors the fringes. While this extensive data collection could be said to result in a kind of informational overload in most interpretations, it looks like these low-level tendrils of the intelligence community either have taken their own initiative to groom kids to be terrorists, or it's working as intended, and there is in fact a lot of combing that happens of people's activity well before they're arrested for anything unrelated. I think it would be easy for one really effective data processing employee to keep tabs on dozens of people. We have to assume all these tactics are being used against union organizers obviously.

There's honestly got to be a shift to more secure communications to the point where Starbucks can't get close to pulling employee text records like judges will do for gangs. If it seems like I'm brewing up reasons to worry about this, it's because I remember all the Sbux labor litigation very clearly and how scared people I knew who'd been relying on insecure communications channels became when shit started to hit the fan. But all people tabled was hit like Signal which if not legally accessible seems obviously compromised.

1970
 
 

I know I just made two Seinfeld posts back to back but I thought people saying his wife funded pro-zionist counter protest thugs was just a joke. I finally googled it. I really should have known it was real.

1971
 
 
1972
 
 

Sorry

It was tasty

1973
1974
 
 

Claiming you want to see the downfall of the CPC is akin to wishing for the deaths of all 1.4 billion people:

Reverse uno card on all those “criticizing Israel is antisemitic” freaks.

1975
view more: ‹ prev next ›